The Ratel and the T-72

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
  • The South African Ratel Armoured Fighting Vehicle and the Russian T-72 Tank are put through their paces on Sandstone Estates. These vehicles were adversaries in South Africa's war with Angola from the 1990's.

ความคิดเห็น • 74

  • @TheKilroyman
    @TheKilroyman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I've seen this exact T-72 in person. It is currently on display at the South African Armour Museum inside a special hangar.

    • @colinm2056
      @colinm2056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was at the show on the day this was filmed, Sandstone Estates, situated between Ficksburg & Fouriesburg in the eastern free state. Pretty inpressive things when seen up close, & fun when you score a ride on it! The ratel's painted in a pretty zany sand yellow though...

  • @guywiththepixelatedface1260
    @guywiththepixelatedface1260 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My uncle worked for a company that built the gearboxes for the ratels in the 80s. Every gearbox was tested to the equivalent (swinging a heavy flywheel), to the equivalent of throwing it into reverse at 100km/h. And the gearbox had to pass, and remain 100% operational.

  • @jonathanlu274
    @jonathanlu274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That's my baby..The was a magnificent IFV

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The world's first wheeled IFM. In the seventies the world laughed at it. In the eighties the world copied it.

  • @robert-trading-as-Bob69
    @robert-trading-as-Bob69 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I was at School of Armour in about March of 1989 when a MAN truck arrived with a tank covered by a tarpaulin. We were told it was top secret Russian acquired tank.
    Two corporals, who were best friends, snuck our 2 troops into the Tank Vehicle Park to have a look at the tank.
    They had the keys for the hanger.
    I seem to recall that it was a T-72, and if so, it might have been an upgraded version of the T-72.
    Or it was a T-80.
    Does anyone know what it was we peered at in the dark of that hanger?

  • @drossouw2218
    @drossouw2218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The two T72s at School of Armour were procured in the early nineties, not early seventies.

  • @videogutz
    @videogutz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Favourite quote "It's got a 125mm smooth bore gun, which is a European choice."

  • @drossouw2218
    @drossouw2218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The differences between the T54 and T55 are a bit more than just one machine gun. For example, the T55 is equipped with a somewhat different turret, NBC protection and a gun fume extractor.

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Ratel apcv is a good fighting vehicle for its time but the Rooikat f.v. are my favourite choice. If only it can be upgraded with a 120 mm calibre smooth bore gun. and some anti tank missile launchers plus all state of the art laser target finders and night seeing tech.

  • @keanur6541
    @keanur6541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Where was this filmed in SA,would love to see a ratel in action.

    • @colinm2056
      @colinm2056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sandstone estates, situated between the towns of Ficksburg & Fouriesburg in the eastern part of the Free State province. It, as well as sandstone estates, borders the kingdom of Lesotho.

    • @TheKilroyman
      @TheKilroyman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The T-72 is usually on display at the South African Armour Museum in Bloemfontein. I saw it there last year.

  • @Craigs_Veritas_Bullet1n
    @Craigs_Veritas_Bullet1n ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Major should build his own tank, the Scherman II....

    • @Witput
      @Witput  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha ha ha! Never thought of that!

  • @zackbarrow1927
    @zackbarrow1927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The tank driver probably means he's driven a Leopard tank not a Tiger tank?

    • @Witput
      @Witput  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think you must be right. As far as I know there are only two Tigers in operating order in the world, one in the U.K and one in France.

    • @etenebrislux
      @etenebrislux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The name "Tiger" is also used in an SA modernization of the T-72.

    • @luizf.351
      @luizf.351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Witput yes and no, there's only one tiger(UK) 1 operational and one tiger 2(FRANCE) operacional

    • @johnsmith-ht3sy
      @johnsmith-ht3sy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      German Leopard tank along with U.K Challenger easily eliminated in Ukraine by Drone bombs. Plenty of Drone videos showing how easy it is to drop shit on a tank.

  • @CareldeBeer-oj5xb
    @CareldeBeer-oj5xb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wwhay a vehcle i was the drover of one of them ln ops modoler from 2ssb to 32 batalioin

  • @TOKOLOSHE100
    @TOKOLOSHE100 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How does one get to go for a ride in the Ratel?

    • @Witput
      @Witput  ปีที่แล้ว

      You go to one of the regular events held at Sandstone where you will be able to ride in or on many fascinating machines.

    • @TOKOLOSHE100
      @TOKOLOSHE100 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Witput TY, look forward to checking it out.

  • @nlomas
    @nlomas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This T-72 apparently has a 125mm European gun and sub machine guns according to this 'expert'.

  • @tituspullo9210
    @tituspullo9210 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How could the T72 be purchased in the 1970s by the SANDF? Doos.

  • @mauriceouellette7514
    @mauriceouellette7514 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bonjour a tous du Canada I think the T- 72 need a orange triangle back to the Tank north america
    all farm equipement need this orange triangle

    • @Witput
      @Witput  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your comment. The Sandstone Heritage Trust does not actually have a T-72 but the Military have brought one to their events from time-to-time. We are aware that in the USA these triangles are mandatory but they are not necessarily compulsory in South Africa. Sandstone also does not take any of their Military vehicles on the road other than by big low loaders.

    • @iHelpSolveIt
      @iHelpSolveIt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Witput if memory serves you're correct, no military vehicles that are unregistered can drive on the road. They have to comply with civilian laws before they can but once registered and safety compliant they can but do not require any specific markings as they're not available for civilian registered use.

  • @tdm5100
    @tdm5100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He was driving Tiger Pz-VI ???!!! Funny guy-))

    • @vvr881
      @vvr881 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He probably got confused with the Leopard Or he was helping at the British museum...Tiger 131 me thinks

    • @markwillies7666
      @markwillies7666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He shouldn't have confused a Tiger with a Leopard.......one has stripes the other, has spots

  • @wrenchtheroo6557
    @wrenchtheroo6557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where can i buy one

    • @riantoo
      @riantoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      in war thunder

    • @user-gx6tu3mf4k
      @user-gx6tu3mf4k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@riantoo good answer

    • @osherabrgel5122
      @osherabrgel5122 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@riantoo nice answer

    • @Niggashiwa
      @Niggashiwa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Smart answer

    • @splashafrica
      @splashafrica ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Contact the manufacturer maybe they can make 1 without the turret if you flash enough cash

  • @albertoambrosio3060
    @albertoambrosio3060 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦 Sudafrica Recce

  • @Getouttahere78
    @Getouttahere78 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder if he will still be as impressed with the T72 if you look at what's happening to Russian tanks in Ukraine 🤔

    • @diagatjl6096
      @diagatjl6096 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Idiot crews and commanders will make any tank be worthless, just look at Saudis and their Abrams.

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And you get your information from CNN?

    • @davemccombs
      @davemccombs ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Deontjie oh god, edgelord incoming
      go seat yourself

    • @johnsmith-ht3sy
      @johnsmith-ht3sy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      NATO supplied Bradley and German Leopard tanks have all been easily destroyed. Modern drone warfare has made tanks obsolete. Plenty of videos of Ukraine tanks being eliminated by a drone dropping a shell above the turret.
      Dont fall for controlled CNN and BBC lies.

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davemccombsEight months later, and Ukraine has completely destroyed Russia, as US media predicted?

  • @devilishwolfie6975
    @devilishwolfie6975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gib gaijin

  • @WillWoods-qg5pu
    @WillWoods-qg5pu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I never did understand all the love for the T72. The US Army completely obliterated them with DU rounds from IFVs during the Gulf War and that was 30 years ago. They seem more like logistics hogs in this day of drones, smart weapons and extremely fast moving wheeled combat vehicles. The SADF shot up Soviet tanks during the Border War with 90 mm armed Elands and I don’t see heavy tracked vehicles being a good long term investment. Even the US Marines are doing away with their M1 Abrams as they transition to more distributed warfare.

    • @a.t6066
      @a.t6066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Look at Syrians using m1s or Iraq during the gulf war or north Korean t-34s or coalition is3s against the israelis. A soviet tank is not anything the same as a soviet operated tank. Each of those vehicle definitely demonstrated their worth in conflicts when used by their home nations. The effectiveness of a vehicle boils down to the quality of the generals at the table and operators of the machine

    • @a.t6066
      @a.t6066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Also us marines are getting rid of their tanks not because they aren't useful, but because of cuts. They would keep them if they could

    • @Vidic236
      @Vidic236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      T-72 is a world class tank which was superior to any Western counterpart for a decade and later versions being on par with newer western counterparts.
      T-72 was “obliterated “ because those were export T-72 tanks given to poorly trained crews.
      Same thing happened to export Abrams and Leopard2 tanks, they did awfully
      So why do you refuse to acknowledge that? Is it only to suit your narrative?
      Secondly, IFV rounds did not penetrate T-72 on front they simply lack the penetration
      It was their missiles

    • @mazambane286
      @mazambane286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Vidic236 So in your opinion the Russians, Cubans and other Eastern Block tank crews were poorly trained?
      Because it was them who mostly crewed the tanks in Angola after fapla had failed.

    • @Vidic236
      @Vidic236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mazambane286 If you had any knowledge whatsoever you would know that T-72s weren’t used in Angola…..

  • @jamaicasysbm2580
    @jamaicasysbm2580 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A Hilux with a Russian anti tank rocket can take out that Ratel

    • @splashafrica
      @splashafrica ปีที่แล้ว

      Most things would die to a anti tank rocket ratel is 44 years in service and the Russians are still building T60s it remains a relevant piece of equipment the incoming bager doesn't inspire confidence that it's gonna be that much better if at all than the outgoing ratel

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie ปีที่แล้ว

      Strange that hundreds of shot out Russian T-38 and T-55 tank still litters the southern Angola. Somehow 99% of Ratels survived.

    • @PhansiKhongoloza
      @PhansiKhongoloza 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's what the Cuban's thought too. And look what happened

    • @lastmanstanding9389
      @lastmanstanding9389 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in the Angolan bush, you must be an idiot.