Readability of code that human writes is far more important to converting it for machines. Thanks for sharing what is offered but its like spreading the butter with your folk lifter is not needed but can be done.
Not using new syntax while lew devs will most likely use them because you think it wouldn't be readable sounds very wrong. Especially with such a simple and common pattern. It just looks that way on a lot of other languages, especially more on functional programming ones.
Readability of code that human writes is far more important to converting it for machines. Thanks for sharing what is offered but its like spreading the butter with your folk lifter is not needed but can be done.
"spreading the butter with your folk lifter" 😂
Noooo, it just needed the one liner func syntax with '=>' at the second line to be perfect 😢
Oh well...
While switch expressions does make code more consice, it comes with readability price.
Is it not readable?
Great 👍
Thank you! Cheers!
👍
👍
not readable
Ok
Why _F only for f finally??
It's how you write the default case
I would not advice this. Codes should be readable for the future people
But this is readable
@@JollyGiant19 my take is that code should be in a way that junior devs or intern devs can understand
Future people would thank you when you don’t use (then) outdated constructs. 😉
Not using new syntax while lew devs will most likely use them because you think it wouldn't be readable sounds very wrong. Especially with such a simple and common pattern.
It just looks that way on a lot of other languages, especially more on functional programming ones.
@@WDGKuurama it alswys starts with the simple patterns untill someone cooks technical dept