Rate Law for a Mechanism with a Fast Initial Step

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 140

  • @lawl3zz
    @lawl3zz 10 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    The world needs more teachers like you...love how you stated the conditions and explained it, such clarity is seriously lacking in schools today.

  • @domadew
    @domadew 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    A decade later, you're still making students feel much better about exam topics. Props to you!!!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thanks for your kind words, and thanks for watching! 😀

  • @username6333
    @username6333 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The world needs more people like you. Thanks for the videos.

  • @yessirrr4326
    @yessirrr4326 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Explained it waay better than my AP chem teacher...Thanks!

  • @kaansaroz8086
    @kaansaroz8086 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you are not a hero you are the hero. god bless you, my brother

  • @superjeans100
    @superjeans100 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    thank you so much! helped immensely. you don't even understand how much it did! You are very thorough with every step thank you again from the bottom of my heart!!!

  • @marisolbojalil7815
    @marisolbojalil7815 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explained way better than my chem prof... have an exam in 2 days!!! thank you so much!!!!

  • @fuegopunchlines1165
    @fuegopunchlines1165 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watched the entire chem kinetics playlist... understand it now great job and thanks

  • @adansilva6851
    @adansilva6851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wait why isn’t the [H2] squared in the final rate equation if the H2 in the overall equation has a 2 coefficient?

    • @potatoman6770
      @potatoman6770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That only applies to ELEMENTARY reactions (reactions with only one step). If you have a multi-step reaction, it is a different story.

  • @ashanpdw
    @ashanpdw 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even after 6 years, this is helpful. Thank you :)

  • @BensChemVideos
    @BensChemVideos  13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    @vegassDJ I just watched it. Although I generally don't like hearing the sound of my own voice, it sounds particularly awful here. I think i may have been sick that day. Thanks for the suggestion!

  • @Didelmaful
    @Didelmaful 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Are the steps always given? If not, how can you determine by yourself when the step is fast or slow? Thank you.

  • @eriknelson2559
    @eriknelson2559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Must a fast first elementary reaction be an equilibrium one? Could you have a full forward arrow on the first fast rxn?

  • @rpayne121
    @rpayne121 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, I just watched all the videos in your "Chemical Kinetics" playlist........Thank You! I understand this stuff waaaay more now! Thank you!!!!!!!!!

  • @potatoman6770
    @potatoman6770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this the pre-equilibrium method?

  • @alejandradiazruiz16
    @alejandradiazruiz16 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was so helpful! Thank you so much for your help. I love the step by step explanation. I can't thank you enough!! :D

  • @codys2640
    @codys2640 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    shouldn't the observes rate law be k [H2]^2 [NO]^2 ? If so, the derived rate law of
    k_2 [H2] [NO]^2 isn't consistent because the ^2 is absent from the [H] concentration

  • @gmunidos2003
    @gmunidos2003 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    great videos!!!! your videos should get wayyyy more views, trust me they are really helpful

  • @BonnieRowland
    @BonnieRowland 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! Very helpful and explained the concepts well. Thank you!

  • @angelaviducich2655
    @angelaviducich2655 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much! This was incredibly helpful

  • @darmoore8966
    @darmoore8966 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was very helpful! I wish my teacher had said this.

  • @christinarivera1610
    @christinarivera1610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very helpful, thank you!!!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome! Many thanks for watching and commenting 😀

  • @dance31115
    @dance31115 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you so much! i have a final coming up and this was so helpful

  • @forevalynn
    @forevalynn 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi! why is it that k-3 is usually ignored?

  • @biscuitmeowed
    @biscuitmeowed 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad I watched this before my university chem 2 final otherwise I don't think I would have ever learned it as well.

  • @mattmcguire5350
    @mattmcguire5350 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a genius bro. Keep up the good work

  • @gaberhunter
    @gaberhunter 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! You teach better than my AP Chem. teacher!

  • @luffymmh
    @luffymmh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this video helped me a lot. thanks

  • @shyannvaskevicius8621
    @shyannvaskevicius8621 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for helping me lessen my chances of failing my Chem 115 midterm tomorrow

  • @jamesdurham3279
    @jamesdurham3279 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the video and help! this video was very clear and went step by step!

  • @nycs9738
    @nycs9738 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    BLESS YOUR SOUL. SAVED MY LIFE

  • @xxanimefanxx11
    @xxanimefanxx11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    for my problem I had to find the overall chemical equation and a rate was given to me. How would I determine if the reaction mechanism is scientifically valid? Or is there a vid I can watch?

  • @sabaal-yafie5529
    @sabaal-yafie5529 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you alot :) It really helped me, I have asked a question but there is no one could answer me clealy which is " Whats does K rate constant exactly represent??" I hope Yours or any one answer me. And thank you in advance .

  • @bennelson2789
    @bennelson2789 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude this is amazing thank you so much brother!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome! Thanks for your kind words 😀

  • @pmvillers
    @pmvillers ปีที่แล้ว

    An amazing explanation, thank you.

  • @user-pi2nl6iu2n
    @user-pi2nl6iu2n 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're a boss. 'Meek Mill - I'm a Boss (Ft. Rick Ross)' Is now the theme tune to your life.

  • @DyingWillofTheUchiha
    @DyingWillofTheUchiha 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped a lot. Thank you very much.

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're very welcome! Many thanks for watching and commenting 😀

  • @nuhanuha5206
    @nuhanuha5206 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am here in may 25 2024.......from Ethiopia

  • @mohammednassar4148
    @mohammednassar4148 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much it was so confusing but it's clear now to me

  • @heidiblack01
    @heidiblack01 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a mechanism that is Cl2(g) (equilibrium arrows) 2Cl(g) (and other steps) I need Cl by itself as the intermediate for another step... i end up with k1/k-1[Cl2]=[Cl]^2 .... How can I get Cl by itself to put it into rate2=k3[Cl][CHCl] where Cl is the intermediate in the equation

  • @lilycollins385
    @lilycollins385 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, it helped me a lot👍👍👍👍

  • @_colourway
    @_colourway 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm really grateful for the help. Thank you!

  • @muhammadericali
    @muhammadericali 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    REALLY helpful! Thanks a lot, brother. Best wishes and God bless :)

  • @singoyl
    @singoyl 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is called the steady-state approximation, right? thank you so much for your videos!! keep them going because they really help me. you teach way better than my professors :)

  • @romagnolirojas10
    @romagnolirojas10 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    But since k1 is equal to k-1, since equilibrium can't you just cancel the division since it would be equal to one???

  • @alexawermuth558
    @alexawermuth558 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Since k is equal and opposite k-1 can't you just simplify (k1/k-1) to a negative sign?

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In that first step, k_1 is not equal to k_-1. Rather k_1 * [NO]^2 = k_-1 * [N_2O_2].

    • @alexawermuth558
      @alexawermuth558 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BensChemVideos Thanks!

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexawermuth558 you bet! Thank you for watching and asking a question!

  • @ddhchannel6565
    @ddhchannel6565 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how we will come to know that which reaction is fast or slow

    • @gretawilliams8799
      @gretawilliams8799 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      DDH channel
      Give your Mom for the answer

    • @lukesurey975
      @lukesurey975 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think they are usually given to you during the test or quiz. If its not, you probably have to determine it experimentally.

  • @HazulMin
    @HazulMin 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you explain more in detail why the [NO] is squared?

  • @jferro96
    @jferro96 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, great video dude.

  • @jamesjames-cy7bp
    @jamesjames-cy7bp 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much...very usefull videos !

  • @Hasko-j9t
    @Hasko-j9t 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much. you are awesome teacher.

  • @bombasticbrian.
    @bombasticbrian. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was beautifully done. Thank you

  • @noahpritchard4214
    @noahpritchard4214 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was an amazing vid dude. thanks

  • @xXsoulcatcher
    @xXsoulcatcher 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi ! Your video really helped a lot (:
    However I was hoping you could clarify a question I have - why is it that for the intermediate steps , the powers of the reactants are the same as the coefficients, but when we are looking at the overall balanced equation the powers for the initial reactants are not necessarily the same as the coefficients . I hope my question doesn't confuse you ! ): sorry and thanks a bunch (:

  • @alicema3851
    @alicema3851 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was a great help, thx!

  • @21DangerousDave
    @21DangerousDave 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    how about the 2 h2? why didn't you account for k3?

  • @juicyballsok
    @juicyballsok 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellant video thank you!
    -Khalissi

  • @megludlam6288
    @megludlam6288 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful, thank you so much!

  • @uzezistar7407
    @uzezistar7407 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    why Didn't you write k3 and k2 in the expression?

  • @roshanshaji5170
    @roshanshaji5170 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot!!!! Really helpful

  • @ilovemyprs
    @ilovemyprs 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    That helped me SO much omg!
    Thanks alot!!!

  • @madisontapia7771
    @madisontapia7771 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    why isnt k3 used?

  • @fudge918
    @fudge918 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is exactly what I needed! thanks! :-D

  • @dotway
    @dotway 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful!! Thanks so much!

  • @TheSilversimon
    @TheSilversimon 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You didn't account for the consumption of N2O2 in step 2...

  • @Passcase2
    @Passcase2 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you determine which is K1 K2 K3?

  • @mechatech9873
    @mechatech9873 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks from nepal!!!!

  • @jugglingmaster647
    @jugglingmaster647 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful thank you

  • @mattcousins6456
    @mattcousins6456 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video, thanks

  • @helo7996
    @helo7996 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this!

  • @loveyou10131
    @loveyou10131 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Reviewing for my AP chem test lol thank you so much

  • @zhenccc
    @zhenccc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you! amazing!

  • @MaddieSilverstone
    @MaddieSilverstone 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was amazing.

  • @Mrwowhobbs
    @Mrwowhobbs 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u very much helped a ton

  • @tev.8525
    @tev.8525 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love you man

  • @kickbuttowskiii
    @kickbuttowskiii 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 3:18, how did you know that the k was k2??

  • @HeavenWolfGaming
    @HeavenWolfGaming ปีที่แล้ว

    10 billion % helpful

  • @johngattone3515
    @johngattone3515 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful

  • @hiranyamalla1648
    @hiranyamalla1648 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    what about third step???

  • @jhmasoud
    @jhmasoud 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for explaining this. It was the exact example from the ebbing book and was having issues with it. They really can't explain shit in that book. I think they try to make it seem complex for job security... this is just high school algebra with elements, at best.
    Cheers.

  • @dudet116
    @dudet116 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just made something that put me on my ass yesterday seem so simple in 10 minutes. You are a God.

  • @gator746
    @gator746 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Life-saver!!!!!!!!!

  • @aayushlamsal7249
    @aayushlamsal7249 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless you

  • @shrihannalamati7234
    @shrihannalamati7234 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks twin

  • @daynasaur11
    @daynasaur11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SO MUCH

  • @geniusgene
    @geniusgene 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much!

  • @megafan2453
    @megafan2453 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank. You. Very. Much.

  • @1111thalamus
    @1111thalamus 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing thanks

  • @manishshah6385
    @manishshah6385 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you ben

  • @AK-di4rv
    @AK-di4rv 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent!!!

  • @notsaif7
    @notsaif7 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    helpful, thanks

  • @venushagovender1681
    @venushagovender1681 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    :) Great help

  • @SamuelHuang-q8x
    @SamuelHuang-q8x วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  วันที่ผ่านมา

      @SamuelHuang-q8x you're very welcome. Merry Christmas 🎄!

  • @manmeetkaur8450
    @manmeetkaur8450 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankyou so much :))

  • @shoryasirohi8724
    @shoryasirohi8724 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir

  • @semerekidane9094
    @semerekidane9094 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @pablocardella5930
    @pablocardella5930 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    AWESOME!

  • @eileen02
    @eileen02 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastisch!

  • @kaneki1018
    @kaneki1018 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks bruv

    • @BensChemVideos
      @BensChemVideos  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're very welcome! Thanks for watching! 😀

  • @codys2640
    @codys2640 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    nevermind, i see what i did wrong. i used the coefficient of a non-elementary reaction as an exponent. H2 is unimolecular, so its exponent should be 1, not 2 (its coefficient)