Universal Audio SD-1 Review / Test (vs. SM7b, RE20, Dynacaster and More)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 254

  • @RothrockGaming
    @RothrockGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +198

    If I was Shure, I'd release a white SM7b just to watch the internet break.

    • @makucevich
      @makucevich ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Good one.

    • @theericmclaren
      @theericmclaren ปีที่แล้ว +9

      SM7BW

    • @JamesWolfsbane
      @JamesWolfsbane ปีที่แล้ว +1

      UAD better than shure… everything from UAD is really good, even the LUNA program so great. Love it

    • @kiba488
      @kiba488 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      if they did watch them charge an extra 50 since white always costs more when it comes to gear

  • @keithgendler8727
    @keithgendler8727 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I loved the idea that this mic would somehow magically work with my computer, eliminating the need for audio hardware (other than an interface), and the need for 3rd party plugins. Thank you, Bandrino, for splashing cold water in my face and the needed sharp slap on each cheek. Your review was great, and the conclusion was right on the money, I think. It's a decent mic, and there is no audio Santa Clause. 🎅

  • @Sedeerah
    @Sedeerah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Since this is obviously designed to compete with the SM7b, I would have loved to see a more in-depth comparison about what exactly is different between them soundwise and where which mic shines or if it's all taste

    • @TessaAnderson
      @TessaAnderson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m guessing there are other videos
      I do like that he follows a consistent format instead .

    • @alexandre7634
      @alexandre7634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The uad is way brighter, it's an aesthetic copy but they don't sound the same

    • @peterm3964
      @peterm3964 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both are good .

    • @teriyakichicken775
      @teriyakichicken775 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is not designed to compete with the SM7b, unsless you are one of those stoopid that chooses mic based on their look.

  • @jamestheradioman
    @jamestheradioman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    RE20 is my favorite dynamic mic. I used RE20"s for nearly 20 years in my radio broadcast days.

  • @icestorm_rb9057
    @icestorm_rb9057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I actually prefer the SD-1's sound over the SM7b's on Bandrew's voice. It doesnt have that resonant stuff in the mids compared to the SM7b. A good alternative to the SM7b imho.

    • @lande.r1
      @lande.r1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree

    • @ryan_454
      @ryan_454 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree 100%

  • @drewwebsteraudio
    @drewwebsteraudio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is by far the best and most thorough review of this microphone yet. Thank you.

  • @bardenhick2121
    @bardenhick2121 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    For $300 I personally think it would be hard to justify getting this when the sE Dynacaster exists… that mic just has way too much functionality for the money

  • @sergigahr
    @sergigahr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'll give you some inside baseball. Internal Shockmounting is kinda a keystone to SM7b's take apart any of them and you'll see the rubber doughnut. every company does it slightly different of course. Shure has a whole AES paper on the topic and sells the shockmount mechanism as a stand alone shockmount. a big part of the tone of the mic has to do with the capsule membranes relation to the metal body. A microphone is an electro-acoustical mechanical device. we had to get that right and consistent. Don't forget UA purchased Bock Audio. This didn't go out before it passed through our hands for input and we had a list. I can't go into it in detail but I assure you its different than the mics rebranded under different company names. the changes we made are proprietary to UA.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you very much for the input. You may find a video coming out today comparing the UA SD-1 to Music Villa MV-3 so people can hear how they compare. The sound is significantly different to me so it doesn't seem like a simple rebrand. I think there will continue to be pushback on it though because people will just assume it's the same $80 Thomann or $175 MV3 with the price cranked up.
      Some kind of explainer from UA discussing how you have done everything would probably help the perception a bit, because I imagine some people are thinking that there's not an additional $220 or $125 value added. That's just my take as a reviewer on youtube after looking at the comments.
      Best of luck.

  • @juicy_oranges5529
    @juicy_oranges5529 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    ...it actually sounds great
    Like, I'd take it over an SM7B personally for less money.
    The SM7B sounds a little more cozy and dark, the SD-1 a bit more condensery.
    I'd take a guess and say that the SD-1 might be a little better for people, who are not only using the microphone for broadcasting, but also singing, which seems like a pretty common combination.

    • @makucevich
      @makucevich ปีที่แล้ว

      I never liked the SM7 as a voiceover mic. Cozy and dark is a nice description for its sound but it comes across to me as muffled sounding in the mids and boomy due to a strong proximity effect. RE20's are much better to my ears.

  • @krakenjm6877
    @krakenjm6877 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The SM7B had very washed out high end/Mid frequencies, the UA SD-1 Was FAR more clear, the only comparison I could make is the RE20, which did have better response all around, but I believe the SD-1 beats it when you bring price into the mix. $120~ cheaper is a significant difference.

  • @jennyandtyler
    @jennyandtyler 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for being so comprehensive and deliberate about standardizing your reviews. I really appreciate it. - T

  • @ItsuneTunes
    @ItsuneTunes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm glad it's a lot more clean sounding than the SM7B. I never found a use for it on any of the projects I did during my college courses for audio work, it was just too muddy for me

  • @RiffsAndBeards
    @RiffsAndBeards 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This sounds real good

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You sound real good!

  • @MattStevens9824
    @MattStevens9824 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Having used the Shure SM7b for a long time, I think I can use this mic to supplement a group of Sm7Bs. I can use it solo too for broadcast and recordings. I agree with Bandrew, the neutral setting's where you should stay at.

    • @jmclane27
      @jmclane27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I got it a week ago. Definitely a great supplement.... And for $100 less

  • @Boojakascha
    @Boojakascha 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For anybody interested: There was a UA mic before :D it was just sold in kit form and doesn't even seem to have a proper name! It's labeled with "volt"

  • @thelovebat
    @thelovebat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This seems like a great microphone for people looking to play acoustic guitar and record albums with a home setup. Not as good as the competition as a podcast type microphone IMO, but for musicians looking to play some non-electric guitars and maybe do some vocals with them it seems to be quite great.

  • @ghanssperling9890
    @ghanssperling9890 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'lll listen to this again before I buy. But you really got into it and analyzed the sound, which I really appreciate. Thanks.

  • @XxDarklexX
    @XxDarklexX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I was waiting for this video since day 1 it was announced.
    About the windscreen, I think there is some difference in the top end. Not a big deal, like the SM7b
    And in the comparison, the Behringer sounds so cool to be that cheap. But the SM7b and the RE20 beat the SD-1. The mic is not bad but it definitely doesn''t sound better that the one it tries to beat.

    • @jcap8391
      @jcap8391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The dynacaster with the windscreen also sounds better. I had both at one point

  • @andidrogynous7347
    @andidrogynous7347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, as always. The first thing I noticed is that it doesn’t look quite as pleasing as the sm7b and other mics. I think the white finish would work in an empty space or a studio designed with looks more prominently in mind (such as Sanjay C’s video where he discusses this mic.) i personally like your studio better, as I think a more “cluttered” )for lack of better words) environment makes for easier productivity. However, if I were designing a microphone I would want it to look right in any camera frame and in any room. I think it looks very pleasing, it just sticks out too much for my liking.

  • @Kwaician
    @Kwaician ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God bless you dude. Always love the reviews. Fully engaged the entire time lol

  • @jkf9167
    @jkf9167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It sounds good, but the Dynacaster seems more flexible at the same price point, and I prefer the Dynacaster's spoken word sound.

  • @noahmirotta6503
    @noahmirotta6503 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow what a great review. you covered all the little things most people don’t that are important to me!

  • @timfenton4943
    @timfenton4943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So my question remains, is it just a rebadged DM7? Are they using the same capsule? I'd like to see a head to head comparison.

  • @7171jay
    @7171jay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Bandrew After the presence boost test and before the UA preamp you should have done another bit with the mic in "normal mode". This would help give a better idea of the presence mode setting and also help show the difference between the Scarlett preamp and the UA.
    Being super picky here but as you are normally so incredibly amazing with every aspect of how you compare things I thought I would mention.
    Thanks for all the great work and being consistantly and annoyingly detailed about it.

  • @BasicFilmmaker
    @BasicFilmmaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "And now because I'm annoying..." LOL! Love it.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kevin! I love you bro! Happy to see you again!

    • @pingpongowo
      @pingpongowo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Woah, is that a Kevin? :o

    • @BasicFilmmaker
      @BasicFilmmaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@pingpongowo It is! :)

    • @BasicFilmmaker
      @BasicFilmmaker 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Podcastage It is! Slowly geeting there . Thanks!

    • @masse64
      @masse64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Podcastage Please make a review of the Sennheiser e965, that would be interesting in comparison to the e945 etc.

  • @henriquenicolau
    @henriquenicolau 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Universal Audio going full Behringer with this one

  • @BigDuckEnergyTM
    @BigDuckEnergyTM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Agree with your conclusions 100%. I thought it sounded great on the acoustic.

  • @mixanyar2742
    @mixanyar2742 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the review bandrew i appreciate it❤️❤️
    i've noticed that in the last few months you've been reviewing the newest product on the market
    and this making me sad a little bit
    there are a lot of GOOD things that i wish you reviewed
    like LEWITT microphones
    especialy the LCT 540 SUBZERO

  • @austinbridge
    @austinbridge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your commitment and I love your commentary and I love you

  • @Savantjazzcollective
    @Savantjazzcollective 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sounds great, sounded really similar to the RE320

  • @Burgoyne1777
    @Burgoyne1777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very good competitor to SM7! As a musician and former Radio Master Control Room Operator, I can say that the majority of these mics would suffice if the pricing was under budget --- except for the MXL: That was pure rubbish!!! In fact it was so bad I have to ask if the mic is not in damaged condition. I have 2 of their mics; 990 and V67G and especially the latter is a first class act.

    • @jmclane27
      @jmclane27 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wonder if we should stop using the word "competitor"? Cuz I've noticed especially with the release of this mic the recording community tends to get unnecessarily Territorial and competitive about these things lol(not saying you).
      Really it's no competition for us, just a new option! As all these mics will perform slightly differently from the other, but I fully agree with you, the MXL stood out as a terrible sound amidst all the rest of these especially at the price point that they're asking

  • @KayVgKatTV
    @KayVgKatTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful comparison ! Wow. Time to save up. Thanks. Sounds better than Sm7b. just a little. Does it sound good on electric and Acoustic guitar too?

  • @ribizly
    @ribizly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am not convinced why should I change from my SM57. And still in love with the SM7B's sound.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      If you like your Sm57, you shouldn’t change from that mic.

  • @asirus
    @asirus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the best!! Informative and fun. Much love to you.

  • @AlonsoGonzalez
    @AlonsoGonzalez ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, just bought the UAD mic, and i really like the sound more on it than SM7B.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Fantastic! Glad you found a microphone that you enjoy the sound of. Happy recording Alonso.

  • @DapperDanLovesYou
    @DapperDanLovesYou 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The largest difference I noticed with the windscreen off is bump in the mids. The top-end seems to do alright with the windscreen on, though it doesn't stop plosives as well as other windscreens.

  • @jimhowell7479
    @jimhowell7479 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the mic model plugins are now available as native plugins (not running on UA interfaces) and it's quite a bit cheaper street price - so much cheaper than SM7s or RE20s

  • @TheAudioCzar
    @TheAudioCzar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This had more clarity then the SM7B IMO

  • @emilemarcotte2782
    @emilemarcotte2782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been waiting for this video!!! I want to buy a SM7B but I was curious to know if it would be worth saving 100$ by buying the SD-1. But in my opinion, the SM7B sounded much better 😉 Thanks for another great review so that I can buy more wisely 😁

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Emile, thank you for checking it out and happy to know the video helped you focus in further on the right mic for you. Best of luck!

  • @mib5633
    @mib5633 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    jesus taht presence boost is so powerful

  • @pooyamoradi8009
    @pooyamoradi8009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a kind of comparison video i love to see thanks 👍👍👍👍

  • @nikolayew
    @nikolayew 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It sounds good, but sm7b midrange is just so pleasing!

  • @miguelmikemigs
    @miguelmikemigs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish the telefunken m81 was in the mix. Awesome demo tho! really helpful as always.

  • @andrewcamagay6255
    @andrewcamagay6255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is an amazing review as always! Thanks for always being so thorough :) If possible could you please make a review on the sE X1-R, I'm looking to buy it, but I haven't been able to find any in-depth reviews like yours on it. Thanks! 😄

  • @fgtw4756
    @fgtw4756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is not lead vocals, on presets, this is lead vox amp for guitar. Nice review!

  • @ConsumerTeamPete
    @ConsumerTeamPete 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bandrew....thank you for your well researched reviews. I especially appreciate your consistent formatting which allows us non-musician types to skip to your conclusions. Here are several questions I would love to hear you answer, from your perspective: First, is this mic simply a T-Bone BC500 with a couple of new features? And secondly, for a person on a limited budget, would it not make more sense to just buy the T-Bone for under $100? By the way, your point regarding the need for a UA interface in order to use the SD-1 Presets is another 'red flag' that conveniently is not clearly stated in the UA promotional material for this mic. In closing I should say that I'm a huge fan of UA gear. Even though it's expensive, it delivers exceptional value. I use the Apollo Twin for VO work and love it. And I've always thought of UA as an innovator. And that's precisely why I'm so disappointed in this microphone offering. Corporately, this microphone appears to be the result of the sales department making product decisions, instead of R&D. Thanks again, for your hard work. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have no idea about the T-Bone BC500. I haven’t used one, so I can’t say that. UA did post on gear sluts about it though saying it’s the same factory and factory as the Music Villa MV3 and Advanced Audio DM7 but they have made changes to it. I don’t have either of those mics yet so I’m unable to do any kind of direct side by side comparison.
      To address the point of a person on a budget…if the mic were to sound the same as the T-Bone, then absolutely it would make sene to get the mic that is under $100 instead of paying $300. Unfortunately I don’t have it so I can’t speak to that at this time though.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Just ordered the BC500 and MV3 so in 3 months when they both arrive, and no one cares about it anymore, I’ll be able to do a side by side comparison.

    • @ConsumerTeamPete
      @ConsumerTeamPete 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Podcastage that's funny! Thanks for the 'white glove service'!

    • @RothrockGaming
      @RothrockGaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Podcastage Mic locker? More like mic storage locker!

    • @kurtralske4026
      @kurtralske4026 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Merciful heavens! It’s “Gearspace” in this new era

  • @timmackinnon
    @timmackinnon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have hands down the best reviews on mics my dude. I want to get a simple USB mic and I'm looking at the Samson C10U Pro from your best under $100 video but my main hesitation is the lack of controls on the Mic. Do you have a review or any thoughts on the Samson Satellite? Otherise, I might go with something like the Mackie EM-USB.

  • @logangamble1890
    @logangamble1890 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I sometimes like to imagine that there is just a giant pile of boxes in the hallway.

  • @selw0nk
    @selw0nk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I read somewhere these were Chinese mics rebranded.

  • @donandmaracapili1384
    @donandmaracapili1384 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey man thanks for the review. Im not sure if I missed it, but did you make a conclusion on the ambient rejection of the mic?

  • @MusicChannel-rf5zz
    @MusicChannel-rf5zz ปีที่แล้ว

    Will trade my SM7B . Love the crisp highs & clarity. SM sounds more vintage.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you've found a mic that fits your preferred sound profile. Happy recording.

  • @CEGryphon
    @CEGryphon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Normally I really like UA stuff, but it's too similar to the Music Villa MV-3. Same specs, almost the same body and enclosure besides the grill. I want to hear an AB test between the two before I'm convinced they're not the same mic.

  • @theoutsiderjess1869
    @theoutsiderjess1869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I honestly thought this was the beacn mic for a second and breathe a sigh of relief when I realize it wasnt

  • @karlbeats707
    @karlbeats707 ปีที่แล้ว

    would you recommend this mic for voiceovers? My room is not sound-treated so I'm having a hard time using a condenser mic but my worry is having to turn up the gain for this dynamic mic so it can pick up my voice ( I've noticed in some reviews that the SD-1 has a low hiss). Thank you! I appreciate this review.

  • @yihbiowyap4718
    @yihbiowyap4718 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review! Thanks!

  • @kennethbailey7105
    @kennethbailey7105 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *still waiting for the Telefunken TF47 and TF51 mic reviews*

  • @10minutemurder29
    @10minutemurder29 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That MXL might be useful as a doorstop. Yikes.

  • @lucasjuniorproducer
    @lucasjuniorproducer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now you can use it with any interface. Cause UAD Spark Native plugins. Get the Hemisphere and voila. No need Apollos anymore. So its even a better deal this SD1 and sounds great!.

  • @muriax
    @muriax 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This mic sounds awesome. I've been looking for a mic for recording my paino while I stream, only issue is I'm not very familiar with mics. Would this be a good mic for beginners? And would it be good for streaming?

  • @graemedouglas4279
    @graemedouglas4279 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Technically, you could use UA satellites to get at the presets. Still an expensive way to get at features the manufacturer intends you to use...

  • @QuantumGamingUploads
    @QuantumGamingUploads 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That looks exactly like the Shure SM7B lol but a very nice Mic nonetheless. I like the Software that comes with it. I see Shure going after these guys If it gets popular due to the similarities.

    • @GenosGlory
      @GenosGlory 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I say it's crazy for a respectable company to make their product so close to another product. I mean you can see it a mile away. Shure can win anything they will demand if it came to that but I hope not.

  • @rylandweet7750
    @rylandweet7750 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it sounds musically exciting on singing vocals… was surprised by that!

  • @iEngineerAudio
    @iEngineerAudio ปีที่แล้ว

    The Shure SM7B & that Electro Voice RE320 was the best to my ears

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts on it. Great to hear which mics people like best.

    • @iEngineerAudio
      @iEngineerAudio ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Podcastage No problem

  • @JohnDoe-fu4qd
    @JohnDoe-fu4qd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I surprised how great this mic sounds. I like it better then the procaster and mv7(x), as well as the podmic. Looks like this is the smb7 killer, for $100 less. Better the most mics in that price range.

  • @illangelo.
    @illangelo. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work!

  • @ewesley1
    @ewesley1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see that Bandrew’s got that chakka wow wow 70’s adult film mustache! Far out! Groovy!

  • @WolfMan01
    @WolfMan01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please make a video of the recommended microphones for nasally voices please? 🙏 Been searching which dynamic mics could handle those kinds of issues my nasally voice is facing in audio.

  • @BUCKSHOTSTV
    @BUCKSHOTSTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For me this mic sounds much better than the sm7b for voice work. I hate how the sm7b makes my voice sound thin and nasally. Not sure I’d get it because I have the icon pro too, but it sounds pretty good.
    I’d do a custom paint job on it though because the white is not for me at all.

  • @SgtStevePH
    @SgtStevePH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sometimes wonder if those that make an SM7B-like microphone has at least one person involved in making the SM7B itself

    • @theoutsiderjess1869
      @theoutsiderjess1869 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doubt it because even though it looks like it definitely doesn't sound like it

  • @littlemissgoodwish4185
    @littlemissgoodwish4185 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looking to get my first dynamic mic, and I was looking at something with really good shock rejection, and this seemed great. But I don't have UA interface :( But do I actually need to have it though? Or would you recommend another mic?

    • @BUCKSHOTSTV
      @BUCKSHOTSTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It will work with any interface, but you just won’t get the presets as those are only with the UA interfaces.

  • @PiriyaSambandaraksa
    @PiriyaSambandaraksa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like it, it's either this or the Dynacaster right now.
    But I just got the RE20 yesterday because I got bored with how dark the SM7b is... dang

  • @ee1yd
    @ee1yd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not sure what to think of this thing

  • @LikeCarvingACake
    @LikeCarvingACake 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this the Thomann mic just repackaged tho? Should do a side by side. The thomann tbone is like $100 usd I think

  • @josephmoser8564
    @josephmoser8564 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hmm. I was actually surprised. I have all condensers and 1 sm58. I actually thought the sd1 sounded better than all of them (besides the Neumann of course).
    I want a dynamic and am between the sm7 and this one. I actually didn’t think the sm7 sounded great here. The uad maybe sounded a bit more thin but I thought the clarity was much better.

  • @Dre_Fitness
    @Dre_Fitness 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a fair comparison indeed hahaha that Neuman is so beautiful but all in all for the price that SD-1 isnt bad though I think for the price the Warm Audio WA47jr is a better deal.

  • @SuspiciousPixels
    @SuspiciousPixels ปีที่แล้ว

    Please include the Ethos in the comparison tests

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the suggestion .

  • @nicktayloriv310
    @nicktayloriv310 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah there's a wee bit more top end when you take the windscreen off but I can only hear it when I'm wearing headphones. Not liking the MXL one bit...

  • @vonnevallon574
    @vonnevallon574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please do a review of the inexpensive Tascam tm82 dynamic mic!

  • @dustymax56
    @dustymax56 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the stache, it looks good on you.

  • @YumeBasil
    @YumeBasil 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kind of hope the name SD-1 doesn't get them in trouble. Since Boss already kind of owns that name

  • @caseyholford
    @caseyholford 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😂😂😂😂the music break killed me! Nice playing!

  • @techmed-rainer
    @techmed-rainer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Danke!

  • @nikolakatanic
    @nikolakatanic ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this a better deal then AT2035? I'm wondering what to do... I like it because it's dynamic but not sure about the overall quality. Price is pretty similar in my country.

  • @sarmadahmad9021
    @sarmadahmad9021 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do a comparison / review of this mic now that it's got Hemisphere modelling. Especially since it tries to model the SM7b and the RE20? I'm curious how good or bad that modelling is in your opinion.
    Thanks for this!

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had not realized this got an upgrade to do modeling. Very very interesting. I'll have to look into that. Thanks for the heads up.

    • @sarmadahmad9021
      @sarmadahmad9021 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Podcastage - Ya they just released a new condenser that comes with modelling but thanks to that, they're upgrading the SD-1 with some models as well. I tried it out and its not bad, but I have nowhere near the knowledge and time into mics as you have. So would really love some technical thoughts on how close the modelling is and what the cons are over having the real mic

  • @clunt2548
    @clunt2548 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You rule Bandrew!

  • @JonathanDano
    @JonathanDano 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am severely attracted to myself in cat ears help

  •  ปีที่แล้ว

    To my ears, Shure SM7B sounds classier, very pleasant to listen to.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I too would pick the SM7b every time over this. It's just one of my all time favorite mics. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on it as well.

  • @dirkschwarze7478
    @dirkschwarze7478 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It looks a bit like the t.bone bc500 from Thomann., which is quite a bit cheaper

  • @S.T.G.
    @S.T.G. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to know whether the mic capsule is recessed by the same amount as in the SM7B.

  • @1laaj
    @1laaj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey podcastage! I’m gonna be ordering a rode nt1 mic, my question is I’m gonna be in a open area, will the rode nt1 microphone be good in a open area, (with a kaotica eyeball or acoustic reflection panel?) I’m an 12 yro artist and producer btw!

    • @SoulFood99
      @SoulFood99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Condenser microphones pick up more of the room. I think a dynamic microphone would suit you better (if I understand "open area" correctly). Good luck!

    • @1laaj
      @1laaj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SoulFood99 yeah! By open area it’s my living room lol.

    • @JeremyHalterman
      @JeremyHalterman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Totally agree with Borut above-dynamic is the way to go!
      What are you going to be recording? That might help determine which dynamic mics would be best for you.

    • @saladassreal4040
      @saladassreal4040 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't get a condenser mic if youre going to record in your living room

    • @rainy2299219
      @rainy2299219 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Personally I don’t recommend any studio condenser in an open area even nt1 even with any “portable” studio even it might looks like u are professional. For use in open area, stage performer is always the one to go for, if u really want a condenser try to get a handheld condenser, otherwise podcasting dynamic is an option as well, go to check Brandrew’s SE Dynacaster review maybe that's ur go for if u want something looks more professional than those handheld ones... Even I don't think that should be a concern...

  • @southpau
    @southpau 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I KNEW IT WAS COMING

  • @Sarsour_
    @Sarsour_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @asianbrooo
    @asianbrooo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please review the beacn mic?

  • @Gholdwayne
    @Gholdwayne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about the PreSonus Revelator Dynamic, sir?

  • @agambhasin
    @agambhasin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Brother! As always great review and a very wholesome opinion, I would just want to state that this is a kinda nice sounding microphone, definitely has that shine to it, which personally I am not a fan of, but a lot of people are, but I still feel that the handhelds gave this guy some very nice competition, infact the 8500 & the V7 sounded very nice, my favourite out of the broadcast form factor mic comparisons was definitely the Shure SM7B very closely followed by the Procaster which is a great value for money tbh and it continues doing that time and again. I have had this complaint with UA for some time now that they make most stuff compatible with just their high end interfaces which many beginners or podcasters can’t even afford, so that makes it utterly pointless, also I think most manufacturers these days just bring out broadcast mics claiming their product is an alternative/killer of the SM7B, but they somehow discount the fact that there already exists a worthy alternative and that is the RE20, all these just look like rip-offs and that sometimes makes me laugh, infact paint this guy black & most won’t be able to even tell which one is the SM7B, lol. Overall I think its a fine mic, has the UA branding and an acceptable sound, but it doesn’t get me too interested, however your videos are as always super amazing and I love you, please take care and you have my best wishes and warm regards as always🙏🏻😁

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much AB. That’s some great insight and I always appreciate hearing from you. Stay well and go forth and kick butt!

    • @agambhasin
      @agambhasin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Podcastage Much Love brother❤️, I consider myself really lucky to be appreciated by you🙏🏻🙏🏻 You are an inspiration and more power to you always❤️❤️

  • @reverse_6167
    @reverse_6167 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Bandrew how ya doing!

  • @michaelreed649
    @michaelreed649 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would love to see Presonus Revelator Dynamic usb compared to these new dynamic microphones.

  • @kleinmediacrew
    @kleinmediacrew ปีที่แล้ว

    for the programm with the plugins, i need the universal audio interface? or its for free download?

  • @ZachariahConnor
    @ZachariahConnor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wanted to dislike it because it’s such a derivative design of the SM7b. But man, it sounds more natural on VO than the SM7b

  • @TheMultimaxfm
    @TheMultimaxfm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey,man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! please compare your old PROCASTER with the new one!!!! Seems like RODE changed it and placed into PROCASTER podmic capsule. I bought 3 pieces 6 month ago and was shocked. Please, please, find the new one and make comparison!!!!! Rode answered me by email that they did not changed anything, but i made 1 to 1 test and the sound of all 3 mics are DEFINITELY not the same as the old one. The old one sounded very close to SM7B.