ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Conducting a literature search using PubMed.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ส.ค. 2024
- This video demonstrates the search process, starting with finding keywords and ending with executing the search and accessing the literature. Topics covered include advanced searching techniques, using filters in PubMed, and accessing literature through open access websites like PubMed Central.
1. Steps of the literature search process, 0:37
2. Gathering Keywords on the Internet, 1:16
3. Understanding MeSH, 4:20
4. Review the search terms, 6:23
5. Database search techniques and Boolean operators, 7:23
6. Searching PubMed and using Advanced search, 11:55
7. Using PubMed filters, 15:08
8. PubMed Central, 16:28
9. MyNCBI, 18:23
10. Accessing the literature, 19:30
11. Additional resources, 20:17
This video ROCKS. I only have 5 weeks to do a literature review for my masters. I've never done one before, so I ended up here to see how to do a literature search.
Same but I only have 2 weeks lol
Thank you so much! I am a medical student working on a literature search and possible meta-analysis - this video is perfect!
This video taught me all I desperately needed to know. Thank you so much for sharing.
The Best video i have seen So far. Thanks alot. You Are my hero. Finally i can research in an organised way. God bless you.
This has put an end to all the struggles that i experience in carrying out a scholarly work. Thank you.
Thank you for a great and informative video. I am glad I watched now at the start of my master thesis :)
Thank you Elizabeth. Excellent presentation.
You have made my search for articles much easier, thanks you so much❤
thank you this is a really useful video for a radiologist who needs to do a literature search on a specific topic.
Appreciate your informative presentation. Thank you.
Thanks for your helpful and simple explanations.
Thank you so much, because I have learnt so many new things from this video
Thank you very much for this tutorial!
This is such an informative video.
this was very helpful. thank you
Really informative video!
This is very helpful. Thank You!
good informative literature search topic, well narrated
Quite Informative, Thanks!
Thank you for such an informative content.Great job.
Very helpful thanks
Many queries resolved...Thank you!!
Thank you! This video is very helpful!
Thank you so much!
Excellent!!! Awesome explanation. Thanks a lot, Elizabeth S.
Thanks, this helped me put a presentation together
Wonderful work. Thank you
great information video ! thanks a lot
Thank you. This indeed is very helpful.
thank you!
thank you for information
Thanks a lot ...very helpful
Very useful. Thanks
Very helpful!
2 questions related to truncation. Why do you use "Intubation OR intubat*" at 10:00 ? Isn't intubation included in intubat*?
Also, why do I get less results with a search for "Hemodynamic*" than for "Hemodynamics"?
Both questions can be answered by knowing more about automatic term mapping that is used in PubMed. www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/pubmedtutorial/020_040.html If you search a MeSH heading like intubation or Hemodynamics, you will find more records than doing a keyword search using the asterisk.
terrific video. Thanks alot.
how would you approach searching literature regarding a particular area:
for example I would like to limit my search on otitis media to publications that took place in the country of Israel.
thanks
Thank you 😇
)how to extrect data in cvs (ecel) file from pubmed
Very useful
Thank you
very helpful
Thanks a lot
great
Awsome
good
BTW professionals in the field all suggest not to use pubmed for systematic reviews. And, suggesting to use Wikipedia is unprofessional
Thanks for the comment! If you notice, we recommend using Wikipedia to get familiar with a concept. We don't recommend relying solely on this resource for information.
Also, this video is NOT for systematic reviews. We don't market it in that way.
Wikipedia!!?? No way, that's really bad advice. I've seen absolutely wrong statements, especially when it comes to research
Wikipedia for MSc and PhD research is absolutely wrong. Sorry I don't understand why including such an unreliable source of information
Thank you so much!