William Lane Craig and Peter Slezak | "Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?"

For more resources visit: www.reasonablef...
DISCLAIMER: Due to construction taking place outside the venue, the power goes off in the middle of the Q&A time and brings the recording to an end.
While Dr William Lane Craig was on his Australian speaking tour in August 2013, he joined Dr Peter Slezak in a dialogue on the question, "Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?" Both Dr Craig and Dr Slezak present short talks and then enter into a lengthy Q&A time.
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
www.reasonablef...
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel: / drcraigvideos
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
Add Reasonable Faith On Facebook: / reasonablefaithorg

[@AtamMardes]

♦"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool."
♦"Only a fool reveres the supernatural myths just bc a book claims itself to be the holy truth."
♦"The delusional religious fools are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt."
♦"The religious believe by the millions what only lunatics could believe on their own."
♦"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
♦"It's difficult to free fools from the chains they revere."

[@Cellkist]

zero comments nine years ago. Sure.

[@beforeiforgetballo]

What are you trying to say?

[@Cellkist]

@@beforeiforgetballo I'm trying to say bullshit

[@pepperachu]

​@@beforeiforgetballoif I had to guess, I'd assume he's talking about how TH-cam does censor comments and videos and he thinks the fact this good video is 9 years old has no comments so might have been censored. Could be true

[@NationalPK]

I don't think Peter did a good job

[@HarryNicNicholas]

quick answer is obviously no, nothing supernatural has ever happened ans after 50,000 years of gods not one has stopped by to say hello. give it rest fellas, why are we even discussing this tripe?

[@RealVision116]

Nah Craig cooked him

[@cogitoergosum3433]

@@RealVision116 Sounds like you have more than a touch of confirmation bias there.
I’ve seen Craig in many debates and in my view he was especially weak here. The laws of physics when it comes to atoms, the stuff we are all made of, are inviolable. There are no fields that can interact with them and no substrate on which atomic configurations can be preserved.
I’d dare Craig to define the laws of physics like this to a physicists.
Such excuses might pass muster with believers but carry zero weight with those for who this is their profession. This is nothing more than disingenuous dishonest special pleading and hand waving.