Diversity Calculation - Shannon diversity index and equitability in Excel

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • Step-by-step instruction for calculating Shannon diversity and equitability indices in Microsoft Excel. For another example that might display in HD, I've recently uploaded a similar video using data on freshwater mussels. • Shannon Diversity and ...

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @pierrebeaurang8955
    @pierrebeaurang8955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for explaining this! Excel is my least favorite part of any study but it's so important nowadays, and you made this very simple and easy to understand. I wish you had been the one to teach my environmental statistics course!

  • @finomans
    @finomans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you just helped me with a major hurdle in my thesis, thank you so much!

  • @gasfals
    @gasfals ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I LOVE YOU!!!! THANK YOU!!! YOU SAVED MY LIFE

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahaha -- YES, this is why I've put this out to TH-cam. I want people to find it and see how easy it can be. Congratulations!

  • @vidiaarmstrong8603
    @vidiaarmstrong8603 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for uploading this. Understanding the formula within the textbook took way longer. Excel for the win!

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Plain old Microsoft Excel is a vastly underappreciated resource. I'm glad you found the video useful!

  • @laurynmargarit65
    @laurynmargarit65 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video just saved my life!! Thank you for this!

  • @walterakeyo9828
    @walterakeyo9828 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WONDERFUL!!! You have helped me a lot

  • @sasasur
    @sasasur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for sharing this on TH-cam, it si really helpfull. Regards from Buenos Aires Argentina 🇦🇷❤️

  • @ethanbrough5492
    @ethanbrough5492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped IMMENSELY, thank you!!! This was really well detailed and quick!!

  • @xx5788
    @xx5788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect, very informative. Thank you so much for your effort

  • @Unknownrach_5260
    @Unknownrach_5260 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This was very helpful. Thank you so much sir!

    • @rhettkeagan7560
      @rhettkeagan7560 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess I am quite randomly asking but do anyone know of a good website to stream newly released movies online?

    • @alvarofletcher4548
      @alvarofletcher4548 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rhett Keagan I would suggest flixzone. You can find it by googling :)

    • @jaxenkarter4038
      @jaxenkarter4038 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alvaro Fletcher yup, I have been watching on FlixZone for years myself :)

    • @rhettkeagan7560
      @rhettkeagan7560 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Alvaro Fletcher thanks, I signed up and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :) I appreciate it !!

    • @alvarofletcher4548
      @alvarofletcher4548 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rhett Keagan you are welcome :)

  • @michellejohn7253
    @michellejohn7253 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless you, sir. Best video I've found of this.

  • @marvinarancibia9571
    @marvinarancibia9571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Saludos, mi ingles no es perfecto pero entendí y fue fenomenal escucharlo, gracias por enseñarnos!

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gracias por su opinión. Me alegra saber que esto es útil. También he grabado uno nuevo que debería mostrarse en HD, si eso ayuda. (Y mi español es rudimentario, así que estoy usando DeepL como ayuda para la traducción.)

    • @marvinarancibia9571
      @marvinarancibia9571 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timoconnell2206 Gracias por responder en mi idioma y pueda entenderlo, valoro mucho eso, me suscribo para estar pendiente de mas videos

  • @esthercochrane5712
    @esthercochrane5712 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this- you are a great teacher! 🙏🏻

  • @xavierhinojosa4698
    @xavierhinojosa4698 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video thank you!

  • @naturelover7040
    @naturelover7040 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir i need guidance regarding spatial structure of forest by nearest neighbor method

  • @fatennaseha2465
    @fatennaseha2465 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for your excellent explanation!

  • @sangeetasunar5502
    @sangeetasunar5502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well explained

  • @nuthawutsabsombat6128
    @nuthawutsabsombat6128 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for this video. May I ask you about missing data? If we actually know that there are 18 species in the sample, but we can find (collect) only 15 species from this. How should we calculate the Shannon diversity index? We can use only 15 species that we have, or we cannot use this sample anymore. Thanks.

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you're comparing among sites then you wouldn't want to add species to one sample from sources outside your standardized surveys. If you used multiple sources of information to generate a species list that's fine, so long as you do it the same way across all of your sites. The point is just to make sure that you're comparing among sites for which there has been similar sampling effort, but what that effort is can be up to you.
      One issue might be that you know a species occurs at a site and you want to include it but you have no abundance estimate for it. You could just count each species like that as a 1 and you could still run the calculation. The math would work, but you'd need to be careful about how you interpret the results you got.

  • @lynnresler8588
    @lynnresler8588 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can this be used with percent cover of each species instead of total abundance?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematically it should work so long as the individual per cent covers sum to 100 - be sure you're clear about percent (100) vs proportion (1.00) in calculations. BUT, be very clear in your application that you're not specifically comparing the same thing with percent cover as you are with abundance of individuals. One big leaf could cover a lot of area in a small plot. Conversely, entire individuals of various seedlings might occupy a really small area. I'd say percent cover is at best analogous to abundance. With those caveats, why not?!

  • @dismasmacha9409
    @dismasmacha9409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if there is somebody who can interpret the evenness result (value) versus Shannon Wiener index (H) value and what is the relationship?

  • @CORVA1000
    @CORVA1000 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot, you explain so well this bioestadistic problem, cheers.

  • @scott-chegg1194
    @scott-chegg1194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it the same process when using percentage cover? You simply swap the percentage cover for number of species?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, a mathematician or a more quantitative ecologist might have a different opinion but yes, it still works.

  • @mariacamilavelezgonzalez621
    @mariacamilavelezgonzalez621 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much!!!!!!!!❤

  • @atifmuneer6761
    @atifmuneer6761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Respected Sir, Thank you so much for your incredible video .....stay blessed

    • @injhs
      @injhs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you get all the answer of In(pi) and pi[In(pi)] please !!!! I'm dying now ....
      Species. / ni
      A. / 3
      B. / 6
      C. / 5
      D. / 8
      E. / 2

  • @jackwarren4519
    @jackwarren4519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was wondering if you could help me. I've been told to calculate shannon diversity index but we have all percentages and have been told to convert this percentage into proportions of the sample catch size (Pi).so say if we had a total of 50% and only 3 species present would I just need to divide 50 by 3?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The information you need includes the total number of species captured - that's species richness - the total number of individuals of ALL species captured, and the total number of individuals of EACH species captured.
      In your case I'd begin with acknowledging that if you only have 3 species as your S then you certainly don't need a biodiversity index to help you make sense of the data. Calculating a biodiversity index even for the 10 species in my example is pushing the bounds of relevance anyway. A biodiversity index is something we use to help us make sense of otherwise confusing data on many different species - say dozens to hundreds. For example, imagine you were comparing among 5 different sites with respective species richness of 32, 29, 40, 27, and 33. Shannon's index could be helpful in illuminating which if any of those sites were significantly more diverse than others, irrespective of their species richness. The site with 27 species could be more diverse than the site with 40.
      Now if you already have percentages/proportions of the different species in your capture data (and 50% is just 0.50), the important thing is to be sure what that 0.50 is a proportion of. For this calculation you can NOT use the 0.50 of the 3 total species, it must be a proportion of all *individuals* of all species. If you caught 200 individuals of 3 different species and 100 of those individuals came from 1 species --> that's what you need here.

    • @jackwarren4519
      @jackwarren4519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timoconnell2206 Thank you so much for getting back to me! So the data we have it only has percentage cover for each site and then at each site we have given a percentage of each species that is present so we do not have individual counts of each species. If i wanted to compare the percentage cover between these sites, theres a total of 8, what kind of statsistics would I be able to use? I have been trying to work it out all day but there is nothing thats like use this for percentage cover. Do you have any ideas?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jackwarren4519 sorry for my confusion, but are you saying that you have 8 sites and at each you have proportional LAND cover? You can calculate Shannon's diversity index as "landscape diversity" within a defined area, but only with raster data for your land cover. If each pixel is coded as a particular cover type (e.g., "forest", "crop field", "open water") then you can treat the number of pixels of each type as the number of "individuals" of each "species". Computationally, it's the same as in my example. You'll get an index score that you can compare among all your sites.

    • @jackwarren4519
      @jackwarren4519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timoconnell2206 no it’s fine. I’m very confused with this too. So what we have is 8 sites and at each site we have a structure in which we did a total percentage cover on each structure and then noted how much of a species covered that. So e.g. structure 1 80% bare mud and 10% Salicorna perennis and 10% spartina anglica. I’m not too sure if that is land cover. Also what do you mean by pixel and how to work that out?
      Because what I tried I just had my percentage say 10% and just used the value 10 as my count number using your example but I don’t think that’s right. Thank you for helping me! I haven’t been able to nm find much help else where

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jackwarren4519 Aha, you want to know something about proportional cover of vegetation by species in a salt marsh. Sounds like you visually estimated percent cover by species in a standardized sampling area, e.g., a Daubenmire frame. You have two species - three if you count bare mud as a "species".
      Now, what do you want to *do* with those 8 sites, rank them by "diversity" or something?
      You can't calculate Shannon index with the data you describe but the good news is that you wouldn't want to. It'd be a silly way to try to make sense of your system with so few species to work with.
      What you *should* do depends on your objective. That will determine your method.

  • @atifmuneer6761
    @atifmuneer6761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Respected Sir, more the value of H, indicates the more species diversity , is directly propotional?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      H' is an estimate index of species diversity that includes abundance of each species in the estimate. Yes, H' increases if the number of species increases, but those gains can be offset if there is great unevenness in abundance among the species. My example illustrates this with simulated data.

  • @ajayrana7718
    @ajayrana7718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir how to find correlation and significance value between environmental variables and diversity indices

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A diversity index should function like any other continuous variable. You would consider the index value as your response variable and environmental variables as your predictors.

  • @danielkrupah
    @danielkrupah 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear sir and everyone, Please i want to create an index for a panel data using PCA. can someone help me, please

  • @sarahle5304
    @sarahle5304 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Useful, thank you so much!

  • @isuekegrayham
    @isuekegrayham 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. super helpful

  • @vaclavkovalsky9686
    @vaclavkovalsky9686 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much, helped a lot!

  • @cleizianebispo
    @cleizianebispo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good! Thanks a lot!

  • @s2100c
    @s2100c 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if you have a count of 0 for some species at site a and then a count for that species as 1 or more etc a site b? i cant do LN on a count of 0

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Correct. The Shannon diversity index tells you only something about the number of species and the abundance of species at a site. You can compare among sites using equitability, but if you want to compare abundance of the same species among multiple sites (including sites where the species does not occur at all), then you are better served with some kind of index of community similarity. Good explanation of different methods here: cals.arizona.edu/classes/rnr555/lecnotes/10.html

  • @riwarchannel321
    @riwarchannel321 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    well can u upload ivi value calculation which are related to forestry standard as im forestry student

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, I'm not familiar with that. If your data are stem counts by species that would work. If basal area or canopy coverage by species then the process would be similar in that the "abundance" of different species is considered. So long as you were clear that you'd be basing the calculations on an abundance estimate that was not the number of individuals, then you should be okay to use Shannon Diversity Index.

  • @vikfratou7554
    @vikfratou7554 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanations ! thanks !

  • @a.e.mahamedi4721
    @a.e.mahamedi4721 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much.

  • @Abhisheksinghwii
    @Abhisheksinghwii ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting 😍

  • @kaiyumkbm
    @kaiyumkbm 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you a lot sir...nice and easy :-)

  • @RecogniseMySkillz
    @RecogniseMySkillz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you!

  • @lizethjimenez6135
    @lizethjimenez6135 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!!

  • @atifmuneer6761
    @atifmuneer6761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The value of H= 1.64 and Hmax= 0.6, dont understand to to fix this problem

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Proportion of Hmax (equitability) ranges 0.00-1.00. If you calculated a Shannon Diversity Index score of 1.64 with an equitability of 0.60, then that is not a problem. One (admittedly simplistic) interpretation is that the diversity in your sample is ~60% of the maximum it could possibly be for the number of species considered.

  • @kullatmuangkhum4344
    @kullatmuangkhum4344 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot

  • @annberry8149
    @annberry8149 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    then how do you do a graph?

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You would like to make a graph of Shannon Index values?

    • @annberry8149
      @annberry8149 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timoconnell2206 I tried to make a graph of the results. The paper I had to write, has already been handed it. If I funk it's your fault but don't worry because I was already funking the horrible, nightmare ornithology class anyway. It was awfully hard to resist saying in the paper that stinking birds aren't being very good canaries in the coal mine for us these days. At least 50% of the American people have some kind of chronic disease (like cancer, autoimmune disease, diabetes) ... I think I remember reading somewhere that 7 million people a year, world wide die from pollution.. 7,000,000 a year. Why are there any bird left at all? Evident we've switched places. The canaries are watching humans die and leaving the coal mines that our gov't has turned our country into...by failing to regulate for our health and safety. Well, that was fun... I should be studying for the Ornithology final exam... dang birds. Actually, a lot of bird species have gone extinct in a short period of time ...far more birds are dying than human... but humans are too busy watching Fox and their smart cancer screens to notice. How much longer can I procrastinate from studying...

    • @injhs
      @injhs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you get all the answer of In(pi) and pi[In(pi)] please !!!! I'm dying now ....
      Species. / ni
      A. / 3
      B. / 6
      C. / 5
      D. / 8
      E. / 2

  • @mmakifighter
    @mmakifighter 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great.... Job

  • @leandroblunk
    @leandroblunk 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tnk u

  • @injhs
    @injhs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you get all the answer of In(pi) and pi[In(pi)] please !!!! I'm dying now ....
    Species. / ni
    A. / 3
    B. / 6
    C. / 5
    D. / 8
    E. / 2

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, I'm not sure I understand your question. Are you plugging in your numbers but something isn't working?

  • @evaofori369
    @evaofori369 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too blur

    • @timoconnell2206
      @timoconnell2206  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry for that, but you might be able to adjust your settings to play it back at higher resolution.

  • @melanysoria6942
    @melanysoria6942 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot. Very helpful