Dear Karen, As always a great tip and suggestion for further reflections. From a literary perspective I am surprised at how boring a scientific writing may be. A scientist publishes its work only after results. This means that a scientist should start from a simple fact to a new way of seeing the same fact. Thus, a scientific presentation should start from the descriptive comparison of the simple fact, prior to the analysis, and after; while this last description should be on the same descriptional level of the former. Then the actual development of the talk will explore why this new description was obtained, in a more technical way. It's the equivalent of reading the beginning and the ending of a story to decide if we are interested in how these two are connected. Thanks for your work! Best regards 🌞😊
Hi Karen. First of all I want to thank you for creating these videos. These are invaluable for people who might not have access to mentorship or those who work in relative isolation (for instance in countries with small to non-existent scientific communities). MIght I also make a request/suggestion about a possible topic to cover? Sometimes, one needs to appeal a journal rejection, specially those that involve a single review. Could you cover how to go about doing this when needed?
![[Watch Party] RoV Pro League 2024 Winter | with Moowan ( Bacon Time Vs Talon )](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CCEDhu6dPN8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you. This was a nice way to look at increasing connection with the audience.
Dear Karen,
As always a great tip and suggestion for further reflections.
From a literary perspective I am surprised at how boring a scientific writing may be.
A scientist publishes its work only after results. This means that a scientist should start from a simple fact to a new way of seeing the same fact.
Thus, a scientific presentation should start from the descriptive comparison of the simple fact, prior to the analysis, and after; while this last description should be on the same descriptional level of the former.
Then the actual development of the talk will explore why this new description was obtained, in a more technical way.
It's the equivalent of reading the beginning and the ending of a story to decide if we are interested in how these two are connected.
Thanks for your work!
Best regards 🌞😊
Ullinta, thanks for sharing your thoughts on presentations.
Thank you for the video! And thank you for introducing your another channel, subscribed.
Thanks for subscribing!
thank you very much for you videos! Do you have suggestion for 3 min power pitchs?
Hi Karen. First of all I want to thank you for creating these videos. These are invaluable for people who might not have access to mentorship or those who work in relative isolation (for instance in countries with small to non-existent scientific communities).
MIght I also make a request/suggestion about a possible topic to cover? Sometimes, one needs to appeal a journal rejection, specially those that involve a single review. Could you cover how to go about doing this when needed?
Thanks for the comment and suggestion. I’ll put it on my list.