Nice work as always Aaron! Flip Dixon did get the start and had a couple tackles, and Fonseca did say Powell looked to be moving well in pregame drills. Hopefully they continue recovery into VA Tech!
@@gregseroka1500 thanks Greg appreciate the kinds words. And I totally goofed. Had it in my notes he played 31 snaps and then got lost when talking about the players missed was a late record. Will get better from this. Thanks again.
The Hokies weren't all that last weekend. We'll have to clamp down on Drones, but if Rutgers' O can continue to function efficiently,, we can limit his opportunities. We'll be rested and healthier. We should win.
Oregon doesn't look great. Nor does Michigan. But you're right, Notre Dame lost to N. Illinois. I think Maryland and USC pose the most problems. By the way Gavin Wimsatt looked not just awful, but woefully awful.
"Dremel has been obsolete this year" ????????? What are you talking about? He has been injured and has not played from the line of scrimmage. Just caught a few punts so be a little more accurate.
@@tomm4733 I said that he is returning punts. He also wasn’t on the availability report on Saturday. I know he has battled an injury but he is also behind in the depth chart.
@@Carlucci4380 Yes, absolutely great to have multiple options., Just to hear Aaron say "Dremel has been obsolete" is not the right thing to say about someone who is battling an injury and still has the coach's trust to field punts.
@@johnpatti3560 from a talent evaluation standpoint, it’s not close based on recruiting metrics. That’s not an insult, that’s just citing statistical data. USC hasn’t had an average player grade below 90 in any of its last four classes. Rutgers hasn’t ever been over 87. It’s a major difference. Again I said I think Rutgers could win regardless so not sure why you think it’s an insult.
I would say at the skilled positions usc has superior athletes. With the exception at running back. However, if you were going to grade players for where they are at now. I would take Rutgers O line over USC's as a whole. Rutgers needs to shorten game, play like they did last year on offense and generate a pass rush, which is the missing piece. Our linebacker room is also equivalent to there's.
What's wild is that Monangai has only played about 5-6 full quarters and is still one of the leading rushers in the nation.
Nice work as always Aaron! Flip Dixon did get the start and had a couple tackles, and Fonseca did say Powell looked to be moving well in pregame drills. Hopefully they continue recovery into VA Tech!
@@gregseroka1500 thanks Greg appreciate the kinds words. And I totally goofed. Had it in my notes he played 31 snaps and then got lost when talking about the players missed was a late record. Will get better from this. Thanks again.
The Hokies weren't all that last weekend. We'll have to clamp down on Drones, but if Rutgers' O can continue to function efficiently,, we can limit his opportunities. We'll be rested and healthier. We should win.
Oregon doesn't look great. Nor does Michigan. But you're right, Notre Dame lost to N. Illinois. I think Maryland and USC pose the most problems.
By the way Gavin Wimsatt looked not just awful, but woefully awful.
"Dremel has been obsolete this year" ????????? What are you talking about? He has been injured and has not played from the line of scrimmage. Just caught a few punts so be a little more accurate.
@@tomm4733 I said that he is returning punts. He also wasn’t on the availability report on Saturday. I know he has battled an injury but he is also behind in the depth chart.
Isn’t it great to have multiple options that are better than last years leader in rec yards!!!
@@Carlucci4380 Yes, absolutely great to have multiple options., Just to hear Aaron say "Dremel has been obsolete" is not the right thing to say about someone who is battling an injury and still has the coach's trust to field punts.
@@tomm4733yes indeed a bad comment.
I wouldn’t say USC has far superior athletes than Rutgers. That’s an insult.
RU 12-0.
@@johnpatti3560 from a talent evaluation standpoint, it’s not close based on recruiting metrics. That’s not an insult, that’s just citing statistical data. USC hasn’t had an average player grade below 90 in any of its last four classes. Rutgers hasn’t ever been over 87. It’s a major difference. Again I said I think Rutgers could win regardless so not sure why you think it’s an insult.
I would say at the skilled positions usc has superior athletes. With the exception at running back. However, if you were going to grade players for where they are at now. I would take Rutgers O line over USC's as a whole. Rutgers needs to shorten game, play like they did last year on offense and generate a pass rush, which is the missing piece. Our linebacker room is also equivalent to there's.
🪓