NASA & Lockheed Martin's supersonic aircraft PT. 3 ✈️

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
  • NASA and Lockheed Martin are collaborating on the X-59, a demonstrator aircraft designed to change the future of supersonic aviation. This initiative, led by NASA and Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works division, renowned for the SR-71 Blackbird, aims to overcome the sonic disturbances that resulted in a 1973 FAA ban on supersonic commercial aircraft over land. The innovative approach of the X-59 lies in the aircraft's unique design.
    Advancements in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have enabled NASA and Skunk Works to iteratively model numerous aircraft designs. Their goal is to minimize shock waves, particularly those reaching the ground, by shaping the aircraft to reduce the intensity of the shock waves and strategically placing the largest shock waves on the aircraft's top. This would result in a ground-level noise impact similar to a car door slam as heard from across the street - something they call a 'sonic thud.'
    If successful, the 'sonic thud' could persuade the FAA to lift the long-standing ban, potentially revolutionizing the commercial airline industry by reintroducing supersonic travel over land and dramatically reducing travel times. #NASA #LockheedMartin #Supersonic #Aircraft #Aviation #SR71 #CFD #ComputationalFluidDynamics #AircraftDesign #WindTunnels

ความคิดเห็น • 3K

  • @tillablem1876
    @tillablem1876 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26522

    We’re getting Concorde 2 before gta 6 bruh 💀

    • @geog26
      @geog26 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

      Rlyyy❤???😂

    • @NeverAsked1996
      @NeverAsked1996 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      😂😂😂

    • @alexp6013
      @alexp6013 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +481

      Seems to be an American design. Probably should call it "discord" instead

    • @theblacksplit
      @theblacksplit 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      nice pfp lol😂

    • @tillablem1876
      @tillablem1876 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      @@theblacksplit ain’t no way 💀

  • @Dadsworld_
    @Dadsworld_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1726

    The air traffic controllers will sound like auctioneers trying to coordinate all the fast incoming/outgoing traffic.

    • @wayando
      @wayando 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      That job is already mostly done by computers.

    • @thedoc9062
      @thedoc9062 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

    • @RepubliKING
      @RepubliKING 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey got 45 A brm2 dbhnnnuhvgjjzjjsdjjxjkddjnrbiiijjxsbsb jisjx d d idis. DIsidiidjxjxjxjxjdjxnxjdd
      You get that? 😂

    • @BirchByteWanderer
      @BirchByteWanderer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Computers are becoming more advanced day after day. Wouldn’t be surprised if big name airports decided to purchase quantum computers for this sort of thing a couple decades from now.

    • @jsan6967
      @jsan6967 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The number of near misses has gone up the last 10 yrs cus the air traffic controllers are inept

  • @n.goul.216
    @n.goul.216 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Let's offer a little prayer to the Concorde, the OG supersonic commercial airplane ❤

    • @lua-nya
      @lua-nya 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah the Concorde.

  • @sepg5084
    @sepg5084 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    It's not just a question of sonic booms when it comes to commercial supersonic flights, it's also a question of profitability.

    • @nicolaspeigne1429
      @nicolaspeigne1429 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Some people are willing to pay, we probably won't see the return of Concorde-like aircrafts.
      But smaller jets is more probable.

    • @supercoach6544
      @supercoach6544 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If it's NOT profitable, the industry would NOT do it... DUuuuHhh!!!😅😅😂

    • @rfichokeofdestiny
      @rfichokeofdestiny 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@supercoach6544Not in a world where they’re responsible to customers and shareholders. But we haven’t lived in that world since government got involved. Now they can get bailed out, get taxpayer subsidies, and have their less politically-connected competition regulated out of business.

    • @outkast937
      @outkast937 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@rfichokeofdestinyyou know why commercial airliners fly at 30,000-35,000 feet and slightly below mach? Its the most efficient speed and altitude for a plane like that to fly at. To go faster at that altitude, they need alot more thrust, to increase in altitude to go faster, they need more thrust because right above 35,000 feet is a density barrier, which means just to fly at the same speed as they do at 30,000-35,000 feet, and they need much more thrust to actually go faster. They could actually fly faster without breaking mach or violating the federal ban, they dont do it because its not profitable. Every pound of extra thrust cuts into their margins, same reason why flights on the Concorde were more expensive than the same flight in a submach airliner. Your point is invalid friend, doesnt matter who they answer to, its still about the money.

    • @rfichokeofdestiny
      @rfichokeofdestiny 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@outkast937 Nothing you’ve said here has anything to do with my point.

  • @gabedarrett1301
    @gabedarrett1301 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +519

    Thank you for mentioning that it'll sound as loud as a car door _from across the street_

    • @alimanski7941
      @alimanski7941 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Is it an american street,55 feet wide, or a normal street, 20 feet wide?

    • @richard--s
      @richard--s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Too loud anyways, except for big cities. But many people don't live in big cities.

    • @Mileal76
      @Mileal76 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Yeah but it's not just one boom, it will be around a dozen per square mile

    • @NoOneToNoOne89
      @NoOneToNoOne89 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Look up a live feed of aircraft traffic. Do you know how annoying all of the car door slamming would be?

    • @Hazed64
      @Hazed64 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@Mileal76do you know how sonic booms work

  • @simpletube11
    @simpletube11 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It’s not just sound that is the problem. It’s full efficiency for commercial airliners!

    • @comedyshortsinc
      @comedyshortsinc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Surely faster means more efficient, no?

    • @snack881
      @snack881 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@comedyshortsincit's absolutely the opposite.

    • @bpg5530
      @bpg5530 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@comedyshortsinc More energy lost to air resistance

    • @steren700
      @steren700 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Above current cruising speed, fuel consumption skyrockets, thats why Concorde flights were so expensive. There is a clear and tested physical limitation to what airplanes can do while being affordable, so we may never see affordable supersonic flights. In order for that to happen, some discovery or technolody related the source of energy would have to be resolved.

  • @uwo5786
    @uwo5786 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “I need to be in Paris by lunch” “say less”

  • @iceneet336
    @iceneet336 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can hear regular planes in the sky that would be cool

  • @StarOnCheek
    @StarOnCheek 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Supersonic travel was stopped primarily because of it's inefficiency and ridiculous cost, not the sonic boom. They could always just slow down when traveling over land and speed up over ocean

  • @-Heartz
    @-Heartz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Natives:I'm pretty sure Red Arrow made one of those

  • @topaz2821
    @topaz2821 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thing about sonic booms is they’re constant for people on the ground. If you were to hear this “sonic thud” it would persist for the entire duration of its flight with your hearing range.

  • @CapeSIX
    @CapeSIX 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I fly from Hawaii to Boston every year… if they could make that a 4hr flight for $3000 I’d be buyer. But I’ve got a feeling they will want more

    • @Aegis4521
      @Aegis4521 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      L money waster

    • @supermaster2012
      @supermaster2012 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Aegis4521you're the only L here soy boy kid

    • @pokemans9753
      @pokemans9753 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Aegis4521L brokie

    • @Imadog989
      @Imadog989 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@Aegis4521sounds like a person with no money

    • @MistBestWaifu
      @MistBestWaifu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Imadog989he's got that broke mentality

  • @rogerlimoseth4790
    @rogerlimoseth4790 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Depends which airlines are building them because a couple haven't been doing too well in that department lately.

  • @Mattvokes
    @Mattvokes 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve got a feeling that this is not just about “travelling to destinations quicker for business men”

  • @mounirsaidi5358
    @mounirsaidi5358 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Commercial pilots when this will be normalized: "I'm fast af boiii!"

  • @thepunisher9928
    @thepunisher9928 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Airports now hiring retired auctioneers to control the comms 😅

  • @delsinhays6421
    @delsinhays6421 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So....imagine youre outside or something and just suddenly hear a car door slam but its omni directional.

  • @behemoth.7186
    @behemoth.7186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought it was my neighbour dropped piano on the floor, when i heard sonic boom for the first time in my life

  • @GrimmShadow2005
    @GrimmShadow2005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would name it the Arrowhead.

  • @Sovereign_54
    @Sovereign_54 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Getting there faster is awesome, but imagine how expensive these tickets will be. 😔

  • @Keyaneth2
    @Keyaneth2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool idea. I'm glad the tech is being developed. I would rather see airship tech being developed.

  • @MrDanielbly91
    @MrDanielbly91 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now that would be a fun place to work

  • @jthablaidd
    @jthablaidd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s still gonna cost 9 gold bars, 2 blood diamonds, and your first born child to ride a supersonic jet compared to the current ones

  • @TheMessengerB
    @TheMessengerB 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is so dope I hope they get it.

  • @slusha8795
    @slusha8795 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Taylor swift trying to get across the couch is listening

  • @subjectc7505
    @subjectc7505 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the FAA allow fighter jets to do crazy things at their bases, i don't think the FAA needs to be convinced.

  • @causeimbatmaaan
    @causeimbatmaaan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Might work strategically in no budget situation but might not be economical for commercial.

  • @sleepyboi6681
    @sleepyboi6681 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know a former pilot that could’ve flown concord and has talked about wishing to see supersonic airliners so I hope within a few years his dream could be achieved

  • @sawyerbarnes7439
    @sawyerbarnes7439 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great. They are already so safe

  • @Redmist.65
    @Redmist.65 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We dont need a concorde 2 because we can sleep overnight now on flights and arrive in comfort instead of a crampt seat which costs twice as much.
    This only has military applications.

  • @saturatedodin476
    @saturatedodin476 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That thing be crazy

  • @shawns2321
    @shawns2321 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome so now I'm going to think there's tweakers outside of my house at 2 am shutting their car door, or mine.

  • @pogninja2
    @pogninja2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ofc it’s Lockheed Martin. Blud made the first supersonic aircraft and he ain’t quitting now.

  • @AlessioSangalli
    @AlessioSangalli 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FAA should not have the power to stop supersonic flight. They should be at the service of the industry, not the ones that can ban stuff or that need to be convinced as long as it safe.

  • @piratees
    @piratees 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Boeing can’t even keep a 787 in circulation

  • @checktec9582
    @checktec9582 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If those aircraft also utilize the potential of oblique wings, then were a lot closer to the pinnacle of aviation.

  • @divingfalconfpv4602
    @divingfalconfpv4602 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn plane tickets r going to be so expensive

  • @ethribin4188
    @ethribin4188 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The problem with super sonic passanger aircrafts is not realy the sonic blast.
    Its the fuel cost.
    Flying at super sonic speed needs not just more fuel, but an entire consumption level higher then conventional jet airliners.
    No passanger will pay tickets that expensive.
    Especially not these days where people can't even afford houses.

  • @VoltskkiGaming
    @VoltskkiGaming 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can just imagine the g forces when this is finally allowed

  • @ionpopescu9514
    @ionpopescu9514 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    IMPLOSION ENGINE - VIKTOR SCHAUBERGER.

  • @OnamissionTWO
    @OnamissionTWO 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hyperloop has the best underground faster option 😊

  • @Suzukkk
    @Suzukkk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We would just have to deal with doors shutting constantly💀😂

  • @grantfoley5414
    @grantfoley5414 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With airfares costing 10x more. Most people can’t even afford business class

  • @MrMturko44
    @MrMturko44 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We had those, we don't need them for nothing.

  • @pfkproduces8505
    @pfkproduces8505 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30% more speed / 200% more fuel for the same distance... oh we're a clever bunch

  • @EcoBlase
    @EcoBlase 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So I am going to hear a car door slaming all day and night

  • @RedesCat
    @RedesCat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i just want my groceries to cost less than $180

  • @skullthrower8904
    @skullthrower8904 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now the parts will fall out faster and hit things full speed cant wait

  • @corbinray7030
    @corbinray7030 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They had supersonic passenger Jets in the 80s…

  • @E-Brightvoid
    @E-Brightvoid 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NFL teams in Europe is all I’m thinking

  • @clintonwashington8609
    @clintonwashington8609 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So we can plummet from the sky faster. Noice.

  • @rivencraft1734
    @rivencraft1734 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There's a chance that economics of volume can make this cheaper than standard flight. The question will be how much it costs to fly per km.
    I imagine this will only be cheap for long flights meaning that plane flights will start to cost the same regardless of distance.

  • @greenredblue
    @greenredblue 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This way the door plugs can rip off even faster.

  • @chocolatnoir1108
    @chocolatnoir1108 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    planes can go faster but remember you will still have to travel on roads, bad traffic etc. so, at SOME points, faster trains is better especially most train stations are located downtown.

  • @Battle_Beard
    @Battle_Beard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    News headline 2044: “Research suggests that Sonic Thuds increase the risk of cancer by 23%!!”
    💀

    • @maximusasauluk7359
      @maximusasauluk7359 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That makes no biological sense. One thing is to have effects that are unknown and another is to have effects that are impossible.

  • @SuitlandsStrongest09
    @SuitlandsStrongest09 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But it also has to be safer. With advancement comes risk, but not at any cost.

  • @gearsofMEAT
    @gearsofMEAT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The last thing we need is Boeing making supersonic airliners.

  • @WarHackz123
    @WarHackz123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The wings give me mig 21 vibes

  • @xmax9297
    @xmax9297 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if this didn’t just apply to flying machines? What if we could adapt it to ground vehicles? What if we were even able to somehow engineer this technology into animals. What if we even went so far as to experiment on hedgehogs and the experiments turned them blue, and then we called it Sonic the Hedgehog. And then we made video games out of it. And then we made a movie starring Jim Carey. I think this could make serious money.

  • @tylerkinley268
    @tylerkinley268 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So it makes less noise supersonic than it does when it crashes? Cool.

  • @MausDart
    @MausDart 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fastest 911 in the sky

  • @LordHolley
    @LordHolley 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Supersonic commercial airliners with their new PC hiring guidelines.... It sounds like a recipe for disaster.

  • @booker9816
    @booker9816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    now we can have a window blowout above the speed of sound

  • @sayasasamiya4058
    @sayasasamiya4058 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think anyone is looking for faster commercial jets. I think they want quieter and cheaper ones.

  • @raidonperdue
    @raidonperdue 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is not going to be as big as they make it out to be. There's a reason they discontinued the concord. It takes so much damn fuel to go hypersonic its crazy. Airliners specifically chose sub sonic because it uses less fuel.

  • @Melports
    @Melports 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The carbon footpring though.

  • @ArgDu
    @ArgDu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome engineering but if it uses even a drop more fuel than our current subsonic designs I don't think a single airline will adopt it.
    Maybe billionaires would purchase personal models to flex on each other.

  • @CynthiaWalter-k6r
    @CynthiaWalter-k6r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lockheed I'm pretty sure you may see this but the engineering is good but about 40-50 years old. Contact me if you like, there is one way I think that can work and deals with frequency not technically tested on an aircraft that is public. The frequency experiment has been testing though multiple time even through history.

  • @JMWexperience
    @JMWexperience 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just don’t let Boeing build them because they will forget to install all of the bolts . . .

  • @goldeneagle2066
    @goldeneagle2066 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At an extreme cost of fuel. You'd be at $2000 for the "cheap" seats

  • @johnbarber7952
    @johnbarber7952 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aren't panels falling off the current subsonic passenger aircraft? So the remedy is go faster... I loved the clip of DEI king himself bootyjuice. That tied it all together.

  • @TackerTacker
    @TackerTacker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool tech but the opposite of what the world needs right now. A fuel guzzling toy for rich people to save a little bit of time.

  • @randyrivera7218
    @randyrivera7218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro is just another tragedy just waiting to happen again like the early 2000 super sonic aircraft

  • @JulianBeiYoutube
    @JulianBeiYoutube 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonderfull than you can skip the time flying over all the barren land climat change has left behind.

  • @ashgonza92
    @ashgonza92 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They should fix the planes falling out of the sky first

  • @kiunthmo
    @kiunthmo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You think we could lift this ban while Boeing is still around??

  • @TheWormsEquals
    @TheWormsEquals 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make this real!

  • @Getsomeandestchili
    @Getsomeandestchili 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think operating costs are what killed the Concorde, not supersonic noise abatement, yes?

  • @Redstorm1220
    @Redstorm1220 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    May wanna build a normal plane where the doors can’t fly off themselves before trying to commercially break the sound barrier

  • @JerryDSM
    @JerryDSM 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just as long as Boeing isn’t involved in anyway.

  • @nihilisticadventure
    @nihilisticadventure 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm glad no one remembers why we got rid of the Concorde. It's the tires, stupid.

  • @ns8013
    @ns8013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, just think how much more efficiently parts will be able to fly off the Boeing planes at supersonic speeds!

  • @jcold007
    @jcold007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Discounted Boeing supersonic flights. $50 bucks first class. Doors are taped shut, double sided tape too. Buttered croissants are complimentary. Any takers?

  • @CarlosLopez-ft2hs
    @CarlosLopez-ft2hs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chances of surviving remain zero and damage increases by 1000%

  • @famlrnamemssng
    @famlrnamemssng 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey this means first class seats will probably be removed from subsonic jetliners so there will be more seats for us peasants to fly in when this gets stashed

  • @TurboFrieza
    @TurboFrieza 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just don’t let Boeing build it

  • @chaniem.5422
    @chaniem.5422 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine the emissions, but try to force me to drive an EV 😂

  • @IlikepoolsYT
    @IlikepoolsYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That would produce a LOT of pollution so don’t let Taylor see this video💀

  • @martinsb1221
    @martinsb1221 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whats the fuel consumption diference by going super sonic?

  • @smittywarbenyagermangensen4860
    @smittywarbenyagermangensen4860 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    whatever who will be the pilots? there just aren't enough competent people for that these days. the flights will probably never cost less than a few thousand dollars

  • @TheSteviebobevie
    @TheSteviebobevie 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Boeing can’t keep the doors on right now and we’re talking commercial supersonic flights??

  • @andreypopov3400
    @andreypopov3400 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not economically viable. The most efficient way of fuel consumption is below the speed of sound. That’s why we don’t have concord anymore - too expensive, no one would pay 20.000$ for a ticket.

  • @JFORCEuk
    @JFORCEuk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait wait I've seen this one before

  • @cameronphin7028
    @cameronphin7028 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aren't supersonic aircraft really inefficient though, I think I saw hank green talk about it but I could easily be wrong

  • @harrymehta8148
    @harrymehta8148 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reduce time in airport... instead of time in flight

  • @MrDasfried
    @MrDasfried 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Becouse thats what we need, getting nowhere even faster 🎉

  • @scottfrank5903
    @scottfrank5903 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So we're going to be Supersonic when the DOORS Blow Off Now 🤡👍?

  • @cool7654321
    @cool7654321 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it takes a lot more fuel to do this though

  • @xz9855
    @xz9855 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But what about the birds above???😢😢😢

  • @jamesw9223
    @jamesw9223 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah, this tech gonna be used on missles not planes bruh