One of the fascinating things I love about watching these videos with Brady and a guest mathematician Is the questions Brady asks, usually something in the viewer's head as well, but it leads to a back and forth between Brady and the guest mathematician My schooling and college has aways been a "you should've already known this, these are obvious questions" vibe, and totally killed the learning process of Math but these videos and the conversations bring back the spark, of just being curious about math, asking questions, and even better, finding the answers by exploring the math even further!
That paragraph with the "you should've already known this" part is very familiar unfortunately, and stopped me from asking questions and for help when i didn't understand something, felt like i was gonna be shamed
Here's some Goku math for you: The square root of 1 googol is 100 goku. And doing a little googling, the DB nerds who BS power levels for Super haven't pegged anyone at anywhere close to 1 Goku best I can tell
21:50 those red numbers are the ones generated by the broken seam of the previously joined hexagon and quadrilateral, what in the octagon used to be the arch combinations of 5,6,7,8 in the now hexagon, to 2,3 in the now quadrilateral. And the overlapping 1's is the connection [1 4], now appearing twice rather than once.
@@lonestarr1490 I don't see why not, for a strictly convex polyhedron you can take any 4 points and form a tetrahedron, or choose any two points and form a line. Although I wonder if you need to consider the planes defined by any three points in the shape for this problem since we're jumping up one dimension...
@@lonestarr1490 They don't have to be Platonic solids. Any convex polyhedron would do, doesn't have to be regular. Polyhedrons with concavities might cause extra complications, so let's leave that case until later.
@@k0pstl939 Maybe, but considering that most views happen right after a video goes live, that means that most viewers wouldn't be able to have any subtitles at all.
It seems that at the end of the video, it is described as building blocks for more complicated proofs. I would not be surprised if those are used to improve performance of categorizations in Machine Learning.
Numberphile at the beginning: “and that’s how you know there are infinite primes?” Numberphile now: “first we invent a Frieze, then we invent this rule, then we write an infinite number of ‘1’s and then if you do this another thing happens!”
because there are only so many things that are simple but still engaging, but still abstract math has it's use in developing ways to solve complex problems
If you don't have curiosity in the fringes of math, you're free to watch all their number-titled videos. After all, there would never be fringe applications in numbers, right? Everyone knows what a number is.
Would you like to see an interesting relationship? If I replace the variable of any polynomial with a prime number and obtain the remainder of the division by certain small numbers, I can obtain several series of combined results that are specific to each prime number. If I do the same with integers and consider only the series obtained by a particular prime number, for example 104729, I can verify that the counting of prime numbers with the same sequence occurs in such a way that if I count how many primes there are up to the given prime number among the integers... the quantity found will be exactly equal to how many times this series of remainders is true among the series of primes that are also equal to this specific series, and consider that the position with which these series of remainders have as a position among the series counted among the primes is completely random and yet when I count the number of times that the series of remainders appears in the group of integers, it gives exactly the position of the position of the prime number in particular
I challenge you as tenth grader to solve it.Construct a equilateral triangle whose height is larger than its side(note:triangle is not mandatory to be constructed geometrically) it seems like impossible but think outside the box ok my name is hareeshvar
Fries-zes pronounced like 🍟 French ‘Fries(es)’ The polygon arcs look like fries, each Friezes looks like a box of McDonalds 🍟 when outlined, it is spell the same way Fries is pronounced in American Frie(z)… You can’t fool me 🤨 😁 😉
Based on context I'm assuming you mean intern(al) IP(v4) (address)? I didn't see where in the video that was, but in any case I'm curious how a malicious actor would exploit this information? I'm also assuming there's some angle I've missed so I'm eager to hear your thoughts.
Your videos fall into 2 diametrically opposed categories for me - interesting as historical matter, and totally incomprehensible. So, apologies for unsubbing and resubbing so many times.
Small Error at 6:23 : The frieze pattern was correct on the hexagon till one fame back but then it got rotated by one vertex. So instead of 313131 it became 131313 which incorrectly represents the number of triangles at that vertex. But as always I love all numberphile videos so kudos to all of you 🤍🤍🤍🙏🙏🙏
One of the fascinating things I love about watching these videos with Brady and a guest mathematician
Is the questions Brady asks, usually something in the viewer's head as well, but it leads to a back and forth between Brady and the guest mathematician
My schooling and college has aways been a "you should've already known this, these are obvious questions" vibe, and totally killed the learning process of Math
but these videos and the conversations bring back the spark, of just being curious about math, asking questions, and even better, finding the answers by exploring the math even further!
That paragraph with the "you should've already known this" part is very familiar unfortunately, and stopped me from asking questions and for help when i didn't understand something, felt like i was gonna be shamed
Watching this while knitting a klein-bottle-shaped hat with stripes representing the digits of pi.
Living the dream
Excuse me?!
I need to see a photo of this if real
@@carltonleboss you can watch her work in a previous video
That’s amazing
I have a fascination with fractured Friezas too. (If I ever change my profile picture to not be Future Trunks this joke won't work anymore)
Now that you've provided us Frieza Maths, it's time for Goku Maths.
I immediately opened the comments to make some dbz joke, but saw that a lot of people were already Cooler than me
@@tremapar Honestly it's hard to Cell me on jokes like this. I just want to Buu them.
Here's some Goku math for you:
The square root of 1 googol is 100 goku.
And doing a little googling, the DB nerds who BS power levels for Super haven't pegged anyone at anywhere close to 1 Goku best I can tell
Brady - once again - makes a great interview.
He always asks the best questions. He is a gift to science and science education
21:50 those red numbers are the ones generated by the broken seam of the previously joined hexagon and quadrilateral, what in the octagon used to be the arch combinations of 5,6,7,8 in the now hexagon, to 2,3 in the now quadrilateral. And the overlapping 1's is the connection [1 4], now appearing twice rather than once.
Great video! 🤗
Does this work in higher dimentions?
That's your homework assignment!
You mean if you tetrahedronulate the Platonian solids?
(Wait, is the even possible?)
@@lonestarr1490 I don't see why not, for a strictly convex polyhedron you can take any 4 points and form a tetrahedron, or choose any two points and form a line. Although I wonder if you need to consider the planes defined by any three points in the shape for this problem since we're jumping up one dimension...
You might need a three-dimensional frieze...?
@@lonestarr1490 They don't have to be Platonic solids. Any convex polyhedron would do, doesn't have to be regular. Polyhedrons with concavities might cause extra complications, so let's leave that case until later.
I particularly enjoyed the shot at 17:50 of intense concentration :)
Frieze patterns are cool!
Best left handed penmanship I've ever seen.
so this tool should be pretty useful in topology to check equivalence between shapes
Do you happen to know why the captions are disabled?
Probably waiting on official subtitles and not wanting auto-generated ones
@@k0pstl939 Maybe, but considering that most views happen right after a video goes live, that means that most viewers wouldn't be able to have any subtitles at all.
@delecti I'm not saying that that's what they should do, just guessing what they may have done
It has become so weird to me to see people start counting from 1 instead of 0
Frieza?
Is there any concrete application of the friezes?
NO
I suppose you could make a concrete frieze.
It seems that at the end of the video, it is described as building blocks for more complicated proofs.
I would not be surprised if those are used to improve performance of categorizations in Machine Learning.
who cares
GPU tricks waaaay above your paygrade
Was there another video in which you cited Cluster Algebras?
Numberphile at the beginning: “and that’s how you know there are infinite primes?”
Numberphile now: “first we invent a Frieze, then we invent this rule, then we write an infinite number of ‘1’s and then if you do this another thing happens!”
because there are only so many things that are simple but still engaging, but still abstract math has it's use in developing ways to solve complex problems
If you don't have curiosity in the fringes of math, you're free to watch all their number-titled videos. After all, there would never be fringe applications in numbers, right? Everyone knows what a number is.
please turn on subtitles :(
Deb Morgan is alive! 😃
Great Coxeter!
Not to be confused with freeze fracture.
Does this have anything to do with frieze groups (symmetry groups of repeating patterns in infinite strips)?
This def feels like an isomorphism and it's Conway so I don't doubt the paper is related with group theory
Would you like to see an interesting relationship? If I replace the variable of any
polynomial with a prime number and obtain the remainder of the division by certain small
numbers, I can obtain several series of combined results that are specific to each prime number.
If I do the same with integers and consider only the series obtained by a particular prime
number, for example 104729, I can verify that the counting of prime numbers with the same
sequence occurs in such a way that if I count how many primes there are up to the given prime
number among the integers... the quantity found will be exactly equal to how many times this
series of remainders is true among the series of primes that are also equal to this specific series,
and consider that the position with which these series of remainders have as a position among
the series counted among the primes is completely random and yet when I count the number
of times that the series of remainders appears in the group of integers, it gives exactly the
position of the position of the prime number in particular
"subtiles / closes captions unavailable"?!
Not only that, she can do them left-handed.
Looks like the Roofed Subdivided Poligons (RSP) of Norman J. Wildberger that he uses to derive the formula for ANY polinomial equation! 🤔
How do you make your animations?
Frieze is Goku’s archenemy.
Seems very usefull for computing how a surface represented by a mesh can be teared...
Reminds me of langlands for some reason
at 2:17 - never confuse mathematics with arithmetic!
😊
👍🏻👍🏻
I challenge you as tenth grader to solve it.Construct a equilateral triangle whose height is larger than its side(note:triangle is not mandatory to be constructed geometrically) it seems like impossible but think outside the box ok my name is hareeshvar
Use non-euclidian geometry?
@filipsperl no its not that advanced
Help me
Fries-zes pronounced like 🍟 French ‘Fries(es)’
The polygon arcs look like fries, each Friezes looks like a box of McDonalds 🍟 when outlined, it is spell the same way Fries is pronounced in American Frie(z)…
You can’t fool me 🤨
😁
😉
Hahahaha
Where would we be without neurodivergent minds
Not on a phone connected to the internet, that's for sure!
Illegal to be this early
I mean it's not really doxxing, but showing some intern IP from the university machines is a bit sketchy.
Based on context I'm assuming you mean intern(al) IP(v4) (address)? I didn't see where in the video that was, but in any case I'm curious how a malicious actor would exploit this information?
I'm also assuming there's some angle I've missed so I'm eager to hear your thoughts.
Your videos fall into 2 diametrically opposed categories for me - interesting as historical matter, and totally incomprehensible. So, apologies for unsubbing and resubbing so many times.
Same here.
🫰🏿 mississippi
this was a 5am upload
But it was uploaded at 10
They're in Europe
It's always 5:00 a.m. somewhere.
3am here
7am here
Small Error at 6:23 : The frieze pattern was correct on the hexagon till one fame back but then it got rotated by one vertex. So instead of 313131 it became 131313 which incorrectly represents the number of triangles at that vertex. But as always I love all numberphile videos so kudos to all of you 🤍🤍🤍🙏🙏🙏