What is Higgs Boson? The God Particle Explained! | The World Of Science

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
  • In 2012, a new discovery shocked the world. In the biggest machinery ever built on the planet Earth that is the Large Hadron Collider where two protons are made to collide at a speed near to the speed of light, a new particle pops up. This particle was in the mass range of a hypothetical particle proposed by physicist Peter Higgs in 1964 and thus it was named after him as Higgs Boson. The particle was dubbed as the God particle and soon a new discussion among scientists, theologians and philosophers started. Unexpectedly, we got to know something that was unknown to humanity for thousands of years, and it was this strange particle that provided us mass. What is this Higgs boson? Is it really a manifestation of God on Earth? Let’s understand it in this video.
    Check out our new Hindi Channel- openinapp.co/youtube/woshindi
    Time Stamps-
    00:00 Shocking Discovery in 2012
    01:16 Why “God Particle”?
    02:09 Why Higgs Boson provide mass?
    04:13 Symmetry Breaking Types
    04:43 Cooper Pairs & Copper Field
    05:53 Missing Parameter
    07:25 Summary
    More by The World Of Science- bit.ly/wosbio
    Life of astronauts in space- openinapp.co/youtube/astronaut
    History of space exploration- openinapp.co/youtube/history-...
    Check out our Magazine which is India’s First Astronomy Magazine- thecosmosnow.com/shop/
    Script Writer: Ankit Dhar Dubey (bit.ly/ankitdhar)
    Video Editor: Team 121 Creators (bit.ly/team121x)
    Narration: Siddharth Viyyapu (bit.ly/sidvoice)
    ©2021, World Of Science (WOS) Media. All Rights Reserved.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 104

  • @Mick-ho8zi
    @Mick-ho8zi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Me nodding my head occasionally not knowing a single thing they're talking about.

  • @mainquest_official
    @mainquest_official 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I feel like I understood 1% of the video. This stuff is incredible. But it is so hard to understsnd to me, that I can't even imagine there are humans that do know this stuff very well! Amazing

    • @karthikchand
      @karthikchand ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same problem here. These things are literally impossible to understand.

  • @jaytime3435
    @jaytime3435 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Finally!!! A video on higgs bosons That I can finally understand!!! You guys did a great job on this one

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much! I’m glad we could be of some help 🤍

  • @anishashee8511
    @anishashee8511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Higgs boson is not responsible for all mass. It's Higgs field which is responsible for only 2% of mass. And 98% of mass is due to nuclear binding energy of strong nuclear force.

    • @akashkatiyar8054
      @akashkatiyar8054 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Finally found a girl who's intrested in cosmos

    • @anusree.m3657
      @anusree.m3657 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@akashkatiyar8054 same here

    • @AshokKumar-ez2sz
      @AshokKumar-ez2sz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree with you Anisha. Even if the Higgs or God particle is discovered , the entire concept is hypothetically evaluated on the basis of assumed mathematical values. Such discoveries as in the past have been utilised either for theorotic advancement but far away from the fundamentals of reality or for some destructive misuse. No clues of realty but good for an intellectual excercise.

    • @AshokKumar-ez2sz
      @AshokKumar-ez2sz ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for your reply. I do know about the discovery of Higgs Boson / God particle in 2012. But my contention in this regard was primarily to focus that almost the entire concepts of quantum physics / quantum mechanics are based on hypothetical and assumed mathematical values and therefore can't go beyond the perpetual understanding of the mind. This by itself leads to a contradictory definition of matter according to the basics of visualization of quantum matter. My view was also to indicate the technological misuse of the discovery as also warned by the great scientist Stephen Hawking. I shall welcome your opinion on the subject.

    • @anishashee8511
      @anishashee8511 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AshokKumar-ez2sz Quantum mechanics is not just mathematical model as you think. It's basically an underlying reality of our nature. And quantum subatomic particles are the building block of our universe. It also plays an important role in medical science for example PET scan which is used to detect tumors on several organs. Quantum mechanics can also apply for this. And if you are talking about AI then I will say Hawking is quite right, it can cause a danger for human beings. But AI also help us in several ways tho.

  • @DebuMazumder
    @DebuMazumder ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I know the thing is hard! But you should have been able to interpret it in a easier way. That's the art of teaching

  • @mrtun121
    @mrtun121 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Such an amazing explanation! Phenomenal job by the script writers.. Really appreciate the effort that you're trying to induce in the Science community.

  • @saqib..
    @saqib.. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Quality video keep growing

  • @gopikavenkatesh7587
    @gopikavenkatesh7587 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliant explanation sir

  • @tatianna
    @tatianna 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One of the best explanations!

  • @debanjanbhaduri2622
    @debanjanbhaduri2622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent explanation 👍👍👍. Thank you so much 👍👍👍. Go ahead...

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So nice of you. Thank you so much ❤️

  • @prasannaweeratunga6158
    @prasannaweeratunga6158 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice clear simple explanation. Thumbs up guys....

  • @shahriamahmudaupo1230
    @shahriamahmudaupo1230 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The Name "Boson" Named After a Bengali Sceintist " Satyendranath Bose"

  • @Sir_Newkirk
    @Sir_Newkirk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow what a gem of a channel!

  • @vanshverma1117
    @vanshverma1117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The research u guys do⚡

  • @baddadgaming8935
    @baddadgaming8935 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Absolutely amazing

  • @saivarungajula6870
    @saivarungajula6870 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Absolutely loved it

  • @andrechenier2828
    @andrechenier2828 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Couldn't finish because the music was much too loud and distracting. No need at all for music in this type of tutorial video. Words require our full concentration.

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sorry for the inconvenience. We’ll improvise in the upcoming videos. Thanks!

  • @mrcubonic4164
    @mrcubonic4164 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Such a beautiful theory
    I can understand every letter u said and it's AMAZING I mean the qunlantui mechanics associated with double slit and again gives info about the proton colliding to give a whole other particle who provides mass calculating. The binding energy and theass defect it's too much to take holy crap I Love it ❤❤

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you ❤️

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's Monad (first emanation of God), from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together with the Strong Nuclear Force:
      1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the Strong Nuclear Force.
      2) Interconnectedness: In the Monadology, monads are interconnected in a vast network. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
      3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
      4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the Strong Nuclear Force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
      5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
      6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
      7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
      em·a·na·tion
      noun
      an abstract but perceptible thing that issues or originates from a source.

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Metaphysics
      Context
      The monad, the word and the idea, belongs to the Western philosophical tradition and has been used by various authors. Leibniz, who was exceptionally well-read, could not have ignored this, but he did not use it himself until mid-1696 when he was sending for print his New System.
      Apparently he found with it a convenient way to expound his own philosophy as it was elaborated in this period. What he proposed can be seen as a modification of occasionalism developed by latter-day Cartesians. Leibniz surmised that there are indefinitely many substances individually 'programmed' to act in a predetermined way, each substance being coordinated with all the others.
      This is the pre-established harmony which solved the mind-body problem, but at the cost of declaring any interaction between substances a mere appearance.
      Summary
      The rhetorical strategy adopted by Leibniz in The Monadology is fairly obvious as the text begins with a description of monads (proceeding from simple to complicated instances),
      then it turns to their principle or creator and
      finishes by using both to explain the world.
      (I) As far as Leibniz allows just one type of element in the building of the universe his system is monistic. The unique element has been 'given the general name monad or entelechy' and described as 'a simple substance' (§§1, 19). When Leibniz says that monads are 'simple,' he means that "which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible".
      Relying on the Greek etymology of the word entelechie (§18), Leibniz posits quantitative differences in perfection between monads which leads to a hierarchical ordering. The basic order is three-tiered:
      (1) entelechies or created monads (§48),
      (2) souls or entelechies with perception and memory (§19), and
      (3) spirits or rational souls (§82).
      Whatever is said about the lower ones (entelechies) is valid for the higher (souls and spirits) but not vice versa. As none of them is without a body (§72), there is a corresponding hierarchy of
      (1) living beings and animals
      (2), the latter being either non-reasonable or reasonable.
      The degree of perfection in each case corresponds to cognitive abilities and only spirits or reasonable animals are able to grasp the ideas of both the world and its creator. Some monads have power over others because they can perceive with greater clarity, but primarily, one monad is said to dominate another if it contains the reasons for the actions of other(s). Leibniz believed that any body, such as the body of an animal or man, has one dominant monad which controls the others within it. This dominant monad is often referred to as the soul.
      (II) God is also said to be a simple substance (§47) but it is the only one necessary (§§38-9) and without a body attached (§72). Monads perceive others "with varying degrees of clarity, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity". God could take any and all perspectives, knowing of both potentiality and actuality. As well as that God in all his power would know the universe from each of the infinite perspectives at the same time, and so his perspectives-his thoughts-"simply are monads". Creation is a permanent state, thus "[monads] are generated, so to speak, by continual fulgurations of the Divinity" (§47). Any perfection comes from being created while imperfection is a limitation of nature (§42). The monads are unaffected by each other, but each have a unique way of expressing themselves in the universe, in accordance with God's infinite will.
      (III) Composite substances or matter are "actually sub-divided without end" and have the properties of their infinitesimal parts (§65). A notorious passage (§67) explains that "each portion of matter can be conceived as like a garden full of plants, or like a pond full of fish. But each branch of a plant, each organ of an animal, each drop of its bodily fluids is also a similar garden or a similar pond". There are no interactions between different monads nor between entelechies and their bodies but everything is regulated by the pre-established harmony (§§78-9). Much like how one clock may be in synchronicity with another, but the first clock is not caused by the second (or vice versa), rather they are only keeping the same time because the last person to wind them set them to the same time. So it is with monads; they may seem to cause each other, but rather they are, in a sense, "wound" by God's pre-established harmony, and thus appear to be in synchronicity. Leibniz concludes that "if we could understand the order of the universe well enough, we would find that it surpasses all the wishes of the wisest people, and that it is impossible to make it better than it is-not merely in respect of the whole in general, but also in respect of ourselves in particular" (§90).
      In his day, atoms were proposed to be the smallest division of matter. Within Leibniz's theory, however, substances are not technically real, so monads are not the smallest part of matter, rather they are the only things which are, in fact, real. To Leibniz, space and time were an illusion, and likewise substance itself. The only things that could be called real were utterly simple beings of psychic activity "endowed with perception and appetite."
      The other objects, which we call matter, are merely phenomena of these simple perceivers. "Leibniz says, 'I don't really eliminate body, but reduce [revoco] it to what it is. For I show that corporeal mass [massa], which is thought to have something over and above simple substances, is not a substance, but a phenomenon resulting from simple substances, which alone have unity and absolute reality.' (G II 275/AG 181)" Leibniz's philosophy is sometimes called "'panpsychic idealism' because these substances are psychic rather than material". That is to say, they are mind-like substances, not possessing spatial reality. "In other words, in the Leibnizian monadology, simple substances are mind-like entities that do not, strictly speaking, exist in space but that represent the universe from a unique perspective." It is the harmony between the perceptions of the monads which creates what we call substances, but that does not mean the substances are real in and of themselves.
      (IV) Leibniz uses his theory of Monads to support his argument that we live in the best of all possible worlds. He uses his basis of perception but not interaction among monads to explain that all monads must draw their essence from one ultimate monad. He then claims that this ultimate monad would be God because a monad is a “simple substance” and God is simplest of all substances, He cannot be broken down any further. This means that all monads perceive “with varying degrees of perception, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity”.
      This superior perception of God then would apply in much the same way that he says a dominant monad controls our soul, all other monads associated with it would, essentially, shade themselves towards Him. With all monads being created by the ultimate monad and shading themselves in the image of this ultimate monad, Leibniz argues that it would be impossible to conceive of a more perfect world because all things in the world are created by and imitating the best possible monad.

  • @callum4796
    @callum4796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's not the higgs boson that will be the god particle. The graviton is if we can ever detect it. Being able to study a graviton could unlock us the ability to manipulate gravity which would allow feats such as interstellar travel or possibly even reversed time travel

    • @1973vanguard
      @1973vanguard 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. I believe that our gravitational field only seems like it is weak because it is interacting not just with our three spatial dimensions, but other dimensions as well. I think the Graviton may be the answer to not just time travel, but also parallel universes.

  • @shanwickramasinghe3778
    @shanwickramasinghe3778 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @Se7en00
    @Se7en00 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explanation

  • @kingabdallah1858
    @kingabdallah1858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The holy trinity, positive, negative and neutral (God particle) 3 persons as one God head, father son and holy spirit. Connect the dots. Physics quantifies all that is spiritual putting God in "human terms" making it easier for us to understand

    • @shmokey59
      @shmokey59 ปีที่แล้ว

      pos neg netural has to do with waves though. im confused.

    • @ready1fire1aim1
      @ready1fire1aim1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's Monad (first emanation of God), from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together with the Strong Nuclear Force:
      1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the Strong Nuclear Force.
      2) Interconnectedness: In the Monadology, monads are interconnected in a vast network. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
      3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
      4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the Strong Nuclear Force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
      5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
      6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
      7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
      em·a·na·tion
      noun
      an abstract but perceptible thing that issues or originates from a source.

  • @livfreediehrrdinall824
    @livfreediehrrdinall824 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Some it all for me best Video 🎉🎉🎉

  • @karthikchand
    @karthikchand ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man I din't understand even a single thing in this whole concept. It's very hard to understand science for people like me.

  • @harshavardhan850
    @harshavardhan850 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Aa very amazing video it is. but I want to know about barmuda triangle, what is that exactly......

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We have already made a video on the Science behind Bermuda Triangle, please check it out here - th-cam.com/video/ocgepkxyMBE/w-d-xo.html

  • @Victoriathebookworm91
    @Victoriathebookworm91 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ok but what created the Higgs boson , that question will just keep lingering

    • @karthikchand
      @karthikchand ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what I also have in my head all the time.

    • @swarnabharat2715
      @swarnabharat2715 ปีที่แล้ว

      Higs boson is field present everywhere in the universe

  • @TejasNarvekar1
    @TejasNarvekar1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you altogether exclude Satyendranath Bose from the discussion?! It’s called a Boson for a reason!

  • @osaonline9540
    @osaonline9540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Could you do a video of what we could theoretically achieve if we can control this?

  • @junevandermark952
    @junevandermark952 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why is the Higgs boson called the God Particle?
    The Higgs boson's nickname "the God Particle" was solidified upon its discovery, namely as a result of the popular media. The origin of this is often connected to Nobel Prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman referring to the Higgs boson as the "Goddamn Particle" in frustration with regards to how difficult it was to detect.

    • @adaptercrash
      @adaptercrash ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum isolated stars in within spacetime within a micro verse? There's a whole bunch of them.

    • @junevandermark952
      @junevandermark952 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adaptercrash The point to my post, is that it was not called the God particle, except by those in religion, who in turn wanted to imply that a god was involved.
      Science is the study of what is perceived as being natural. Religious claims are of there being a "super"-natural.

    • @adaptercrash
      @adaptercrash ปีที่แล้ว

      @@junevandermark952 no it's really an isolated star within its own quantum field within spacetime

  • @thegriffin5556
    @thegriffin5556 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video

  • @mattclement6974
    @mattclement6974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So it lools like I'm in over my head again..

    • @RK_peace
      @RK_peace 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here 🙋🏽‍♂️

    • @mainquest_official
      @mainquest_official 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup, I am all the way with you ^

  • @sundareshvenugopal6575
    @sundareshvenugopal6575 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without the atom there is no universe. The origin of this complex universe is always the most elementary of its particles. Without the one there is no many.

  • @janakrajpathak1405
    @janakrajpathak1405 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Greenwhite clothe and ego are waiting for 7 god particles in Random access memory.

  • @user-wx4lq1sh5t
    @user-wx4lq1sh5t 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats fine up to, higgosboson .

  • @RajkumarDgupta
    @RajkumarDgupta ปีที่แล้ว

    do you know from where the name "boson" come from?

  • @Abish_
    @Abish_ ปีที่แล้ว

    🤯

  • @MrM8KITHAPPEN
    @MrM8KITHAPPEN 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m confused, is it the field or the particle that gives mass? I thought coming into contact with the Higgs field is what gives the particle mass🥴🤔

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's the Higgs field that gives particles mass, rather than the Higgs boson particle itself. The Higgs field is an invisible energy field that permeates all of space. When particles interact with this field, they acquire mass. This interaction is "mediated" by Higgs boson particles.
      In simple terms, imagine the Higgs field as a vast ocean and particles as swimmers. As they move through the ocean, they experience resistance, which we interpret as mass. The Higgs boson particles are like the waves generated in the ocean. They are the "excitations" of the Higgs field that give other particles mass by interacting with them.

  • @foster5676
    @foster5676 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vigyaan TV india intro 🙂

    • @TheWorldOfScienceCo
      @TheWorldOfScienceCo  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No it isn’t of any such channel. It’s partly custom made and partly a “licensed” footage “purchased” by World Of Science Media.

  • @anonimofied
    @anonimofied ปีที่แล้ว +1

    more like the demon particle

  • @sasasa1369
    @sasasa1369 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look to this my strangest analyses....
    Its as follow :-
    The god is hard wear & soft wear....
    He is like huge computer....
    Any thing is a material you see or not see it is hard wear like stars, sun, plant, human, animals, sea, rever, mounts, moon trees, galaxies, black hole, atom & its partical all this is hard wear......
    In this hard wear theres soft wear......
    The soft wear this arranged scincelly to artifcial intelligance...
    This artificial intelligance
    Lead armies consists of dead humman....
    This dead humman is more types, theres operators, sciencerests, leaders snd masters.
    All those do all things by more types of powers by theire digital devices..

  • @Soesanto45.13
    @Soesanto45.13 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pada makrokosmos ada atom yang bermuatan proton neutron dan elektron.. Yang pada-nya ada sifat zatKu. Dan pada mikrokosmos ada qalb yang bermuatan fuad syaghofa dan lubb.. Yang pada-nya ada sirr dan didalam sirr itu ada Aku(Wahdatulwujud)😔#

  • @elecomize
    @elecomize 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    huh??

  • @kamleshsable21
    @kamleshsable21 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are arvin ash of India

  • @hqs9585
    @hqs9585 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Time frame 8:27, "without Higgs particle we humans would not have any mass..." WRONG statement. Higs particle makes up for very little percent of our mass, more of our mass is from other elementary particles i.e., electrons about 25 grams, and so on.

  • @sourabhsharma9404
    @sourabhsharma9404 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unable to understand 😑😑😑

  • @rajeevsharma4644
    @rajeevsharma4644 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God particle change which any substances and he produce whic type or enargy it matter to our habitats and human can cantrol it are not cantrol its changes mare English tode kamjor h lakin aap smaj jao gye Mera mtlab ya human is ko cantrol kar skta h ki nhi ager is m change hota h to ya kya kar skta h or is sa ham ko kya Dak ne ko mil skta h kyo ki ya big bang m be hota h

  • @rondeneef
    @rondeneef ปีที่แล้ว

    zwart gat... infinity hole. the portal....

    • @rondeneef
      @rondeneef ปีที่แล้ว

      mag. 34002300gauss/vb 158,569 hz

    • @rondeneef
      @rondeneef ปีที่แล้ว

      NO i can not tell you the lotto nrz

  • @rondeneef
    @rondeneef ปีที่แล้ว

    grav-mag

  • @paulacaulk5491
    @paulacaulk5491 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    AB RH NEG Golden intelligence shall not tolerate Evils mistakes he does not understand Principle without partners WILL
    SHE KNOWS

  • @scottwalker3404
    @scottwalker3404 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You have to re-learn what you have learned. WHOLE SHIT

  • @rondeneef
    @rondeneef ปีที่แล้ว

    the thing is' world of sciense'. we all died when..............2800 eos. 3000. the.

  • @FortyBlack
    @FortyBlack 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can't explain anything like that , let God explain it then , duhhh if God didn't think or speak how could anyone else achieve it , 😂😂😂 you can't create anything from thin air ok

  • @ronsen7119
    @ronsen7119 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is just wikipedia talking with pictures!
    Try explaining slowly with relevant simple analogies ....everyone listening out here is not a quantum geek!
    hope you would implement the suggestion❤