There's a debate about whether the type of system that existed in the Eastern republics was similar to that of Western Republics. We don't know. Panini's point could also be meant for the Kshatriyas alone i.e there was complete equality within the Kshatriyas. Also, there's no evidence to suggest that caste didn't exist in the western part of the Subcontinent. Most evidence I've come across does point to the fact that caste also existed in Western India. Panini calls the republics of western India Kshatriya sangha. So clearly, Varna was there in western India as well.
Congratulations for your first 10000 subscribers..!! Aulikaras fought successfully with Huns & defeated them. Malava rulers Aulikaras from eastern Rajasthan are descendants of early Malavas or Malav,present Ravi areas of Mulsthan or Multan. Multan is still called as land of Aulias& wheather this name relates to Aulikaras ?
in some versions of the inscription we find this name but in some scholars interpret it as meaning "enemy". So there's a debate about who this second power was.
The 7 greatest empires in Indian history are 1.Maurya empire(5 million sq km) 2.Gupta empire(3.5 million sq km) 3.Karkota empire(3 million sq km) 4.Aulikara empire(2.8 million sq km) 5.Maratha empire(2.5 million sq km) 6.Kushan empire(2.5 million sq km) 7.Chola empire(2 million sq km)
Hi Jay, I’m wondering if you have listened to the Hellenistic age podcast on TH-cam. The presenter goes with real scholarly passion comprehensively into Greek history - of particular interest would be his lectures on the indo Greeks and graeco bactrians.
The script was used particularly in Eastern UP and Bihar region. I belong to eastern UP so I thought it would be nice to use it here. It is hard to trace the rise and fall of Kaithi scirpt. We know it originated from Nagari but when it comes to the decline, there's no one reason. Standardisation of a common Devanagri script and other political factors were behind the decline of this script.
Hi , I recently discovered your channel. I have a general question regarding ancient history. And you seem to be a very knowledgable person. What are your views on Puranic Chronology and how our currently established timeline may not be accurate and have a error of 600-1300 years. Acc to this theory, Alexander and Chandragupta Maurya are not contemporaries, Many events have been dated from Parikshit's crowning (Abhimanyu's son) and do not fit at all according to the current timeline. Even for Magadha rulers there is complete list from Jarasandha to Brihadartha dynasty, which was then overthrown by Bimbisara. DR Mankad wrote a book in 1952 on the same, And Vedveer Arya is building upon it in the recent times.
I don't think there's an error of 600-1300 years. Would request you to go through Hem Chandra Raychaudhuri's the Political History of Ancient India, From the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty.
No, there's no conclusive proof. But we have names of the Malava Raja who claims to belong to a gotra similar to the gotra of an early Aulikara king. Then both ruled the same region and were present during the same period. From all this, it is generally believed that the Aulikaras belonged to the Malava gana.
Malwa in Rajasthan!! well known Mewar... Most of the places sounds Maarwaadi ( Rajasthani language) n all kings follow Lord Shiva!! Mahaakal !! or his family members!!
Is there any relation between Aulikar dynasty and Holkar dynasty of Marathas? I mean, are Holkars descendants of Aulikaras? They are quite similar sounding.
Holkars were small time farmers from up-mp before being lifted with generational loyalty under Maratha and becoming small time rules of Malwa Their main leader lost to Afghans I don't remember his name but he was Ahilyabai holkars father in law
Singh sahab they are Aulakh not the Aulikaras.'Aulikaras' is used to confuse the reality of this dynasty.The ' Aulakhs'are powerful gotra of Jutts in Punjab region of India.The Huns invaded India after the peak of Gupta Empire.
Source ??? Aur jaat pahali baar kaha kaise mention hai ye bhi bhej dena par jaatland ki site nahi honi chhahiye kuvh accha source. Aulakh aur alakh bhi same hoga phir to aur ese na jane kitne similar word ko tum same bata doge kahi mention hai kya ki vo aulikara jaat the
They are said to be kshatriyas and jatts were never given kshatriya status. More closely related group of jats would be western kshatraps of Gujrat. And many sakas also took indian last names so dna study would be only way to find the identity. A marker of jatts and rors is R1a z2124.
@@gravewalker34are u mad jatts don't have Y haplotype,they have l,J but not R1A don't spread wrong information some ethnic groups in India have R1A Brahmins (72%, khatri, yadav (67%), saharia,lohana etc jatts and ror don't have Y haplotype
The internal power that threatened Guptas & Aulikaras were probably Nāɡās or Vākāṭakas or could be both. Skanda Gupta claims victory over Nāgās in his Junāgaḍh inscription
Means without any evidence just on the basis of your thinking you named aulikaras Gujjars even after evidences are available that the aulikaras were Aulakh jats
öncesi hariç 3000 yıl yazılı tarih boyunca biz hunlar her istediğimizde bütün hindistanı aynı çin ülkesini kullandığımız gibi aynı persler ve romalılar gibi kullandık ve faydalandık tıpkı kurtların koyun sürülerine saldırması gibi istediğimiz ne varsa aldık. topraklarınız hiç bir işimize yaramazki neden istila edelim ? baharat tarımını en iyi hintliler icra ediyor.. pirinç ve ipeği çinlilerin, sirke ,tuz ,şarap, tahıl, kadın ve et ihtiyacımızı karşılamayı roma ve farsların icra ettiği gibi. zaten atlarımızın boynundaki kayışları bağladığımız tahta kazıkları çaktığımız her toprak parçası bizim oldu tüm tarih boyunca..karşımızdaki ordu çok kalabalık ise geri çekiliriz, bizim amacımız koyun eti yemek çoban eti değil
"Your lands are of no use to us, why should we invade? " yay the huns just happened to leave behind there coins in India. And all those kings just made up a story about reclaiming territorry lost to hunas. The huna invasion of India was also mentioned in chinese and indian sources and it almost singlehandedly led to fall of guptas and rise of pushyabhutis. There are multiple Rajput clans that are descended from hunas. "our aim is to eat mutton, not shepherd's meat" apparently also destroying buddha stupas and monstaries "we" no one knows if hunas were turks, mongols or any other altaic group.
To know more about the Kshatriya republics like the Malavas. Do watch this video also.
th-cam.com/video/O4YhgFHf6co/w-d-xo.html
There's a debate about whether the type of system that existed in the Eastern republics was similar to that of Western Republics. We don't know. Panini's point could also be meant for the Kshatriyas alone i.e there was complete equality within the Kshatriyas.
Also, there's no evidence to suggest that caste didn't exist in the western part of the Subcontinent. Most evidence I've come across does point to the fact that caste also existed in Western India. Panini calls the republics of western India Kshatriya sangha. So clearly, Varna was there in western India as well.
@@JayVardhanSingh sir hindi me samjhaeye
Congratulations for your first 10000 subscribers..!!
Aulikaras fought successfully with Huns & defeated them.
Malava rulers Aulikaras from eastern Rajasthan are descendants of early Malavas or Malav,present Ravi areas of Mulsthan or Multan.
Multan is still called as land of Aulias& wheather this name relates to Aulikaras ?
Thank you!
I don't think there is any relation between Auliya and Aulikara.
Great initiative
The power that threatened guptas and aulikaras was Pushyamitras/Yudhmitras?
in some versions of the inscription we find this name but in some scholars interpret it as meaning "enemy". So there's a debate about who this second power was.
@@JayVardhanSingh thanks, btw congrats on 10k 🤝🏻
thanks bhai
The 7 greatest empires in Indian history are
1.Maurya empire(5 million sq km)
2.Gupta empire(3.5 million sq km)
3.Karkota empire(3 million sq km)
4.Aulikara empire(2.8 million sq km)
5.Maratha empire(2.5 million sq km)
6.Kushan empire(2.5 million sq km)
7.Chola empire(2 million sq km)
Congratulations bro for ur 10,000 subscribers 🔥
Thank you
Congrats for 10k
Thank you!
Hi Jay, I’m wondering if you have listened to the Hellenistic age podcast on TH-cam. The presenter goes with real scholarly passion comprehensively into Greek history - of particular interest would be his lectures on the indo Greeks and graeco bactrians.
Yes, have listened to him and I am great fan of his work.
I read about artillery being used during mahajanapadas period
It hurled stone , i think it was Ajatashatru
yes the term in the text is Mahashilakantaka
Which app / website you use to make maps ?
I use photoshop and for animation I use after effects
Can you mail this picture in shown in youtube suggestion ?
Make a video on vardhan dynasty plz
Yes will do so soon
I just noticed that you have signed your name in kaithi script at bottom right corner. Can you give history of rise and fall of kaithi script
The script was used particularly in Eastern UP and Bihar region. I belong to eastern UP so I thought it would be nice to use it here.
It is hard to trace the rise and fall of Kaithi scirpt. We know it originated from Nagari but when it comes to the decline, there's no one reason. Standardisation of a common Devanagri script and other political factors were behind the decline of this script.
@@JayVardhanSingh accent to Delhi side ka hai aapka
Please make video on guhil dynasty
Please make videos on imperial palas
Yes would do so soon.
10k ! Congratulations sir ❤
Many many thanks
Beautiful information
Congratulations for 10 k subscribers
Thank you
Hi , I recently discovered your channel. I have a general question regarding ancient history. And you seem to be a very knowledgable person.
What are your views on Puranic Chronology and how our currently established timeline may not be accurate and have a error of 600-1300 years. Acc to this theory, Alexander and Chandragupta Maurya are not contemporaries, Many events have been dated from Parikshit's crowning (Abhimanyu's son) and do not fit at all according to the current timeline. Even for Magadha rulers there is complete list from Jarasandha to Brihadartha dynasty, which was then overthrown by Bimbisara. DR Mankad wrote a book in 1952 on the same, And Vedveer Arya is building upon it in the recent times.
I don't think there's an error of 600-1300 years.
Would request you to go through Hem Chandra Raychaudhuri's the Political History of Ancient India, From the Accession of Parikshit to the Extinction of the Gupta Dynasty.
Brother what does the phrase "Ajay Jarto Hunan" actually means ?
I don't know. Haven't come across this phrase before.
Majbut saktishli huns jinko haraya na ja sake (jarto means majbut ,jo saririk rup se bhut majbut thy ase huns)
Ajay mtlb win, jarto mtlb exhaust, hunan mtlb huns. This is the actual meaning of this sanskrit phrase. Do check it if u don't believe
Iska Hindi video kab aayega
Make vedio on cholas conquest
Yes would do so soon
Very informative video
Xuanzang also mentioned yashodharman defeating hunas with narashima baaladitya.
great information sir 👍
Do we find conclusive evidence of Aulikaras bruh from Malavas?
No, there's no conclusive proof. But we have names of the Malava Raja who claims to belong to a gotra similar to the gotra of an early Aulikara king. Then both ruled the same region and were present during the same period. From all this, it is generally believed that the Aulikaras belonged to the Malava gana.
@@JayVardhanSingh what was the gotra of Aulikara kings?
Malwa in Rajasthan!! well known Mewar... Most of the places sounds Maarwaadi ( Rajasthani language) n all kings follow Lord Shiva!! Mahaakal !! or his family members!!
@@sonichug3372 Haan to?
It will be great to thtough light on RAI DYNESTY OF SIND
Ye channel ek vardaan haii
Nice
Aulikara are today's Aulakh Jatts. Only the jatts had the power to defeat the Huns.
Fake
Again idiotic claim
Your videos are very educative, & informative. But you can reduce your speed.
Bhai ,aap podcast bhi shuru karo
bhai mera second channel h usme meri podcast h, ye rhaa link
www.youtube.com/@HistoricallySpeakingPodcast
@@JayVardhanSingh i mean Google podcast
Haan Bhai Google podcast aur Spotify pr bhi h.aap type karoge historically speaking to aaega
Is there any relation between Aulikar dynasty and Holkar dynasty of Marathas? I mean, are Holkars descendants of Aulikaras? They are quite similar sounding.
I don't think there's any relation between the two.
Holkars were small time farmers from up-mp before being lifted with generational loyalty under Maratha and becoming small time rules of Malwa
Their main leader lost to Afghans I don't remember his name but he was Ahilyabai holkars father in law
@@JayVardhanSinghaulikaras most probably were parmar rajputs I think or a branch of parmar rajputs.
The Hun invasion took place before the origin of Rajput word.
@@VimalKumar-xt3vn that doesn't mean there were no rajputs clans before.
👍👍👍👍
Singh sahab they are Aulakh not the Aulikaras.'Aulikaras' is used to confuse the reality of this dynasty.The ' Aulakhs'are powerful gotra of Jutts in Punjab region of India.The Huns invaded India after the peak of Gupta Empire.
Jutts are descendants of hunas
Source ??? Aur jaat pahali baar kaha kaise mention hai ye bhi bhej dena par jaatland ki site nahi honi chhahiye kuvh accha source. Aulakh aur alakh bhi same hoga phir to aur ese na jane kitne similar word ko tum same bata doge kahi mention hai kya ki vo aulikara jaat the
They are said to be kshatriyas and jatts were never given kshatriya status. More closely related group of jats would be western kshatraps of Gujrat. And many sakas also took indian last names so dna study would be only way to find the identity. A marker of jatts and rors is R1a z2124.
@@gravewalker34are u mad jatts don't have Y haplotype,they have l,J but not R1A don't spread wrong information some ethnic groups in India have R1A Brahmins (72%, khatri, yadav (67%), saharia,lohana etc jatts and ror don't have Y haplotype
@@purukumargudheniya-ri7gr jatts pashtuns are 75% R1aZ2124
The internal power that threatened Guptas & Aulikaras were probably Nāɡās or Vākāṭakas or could be both.
Skanda Gupta claims victory over Nāgās in his Junāgaḍh inscription
You mean not the huns but south part of some huns...not the whole empire.
You are missing on a wider audiance by not making videos in Hindi. Should do that too.
Olinker king one have .award of jai janendra.
You tell us what you believe ...We believe you....
Why are you saying scholars believed / historians believed... Etc ?!! You are a scholar too
It is important to differentiate between my views and views of other scholars. I can't use their argument and say that it is mine.
It is what makes him a reliable presenter of views because he cites his sources and doesn’t make things up
Ajayat Jarto Huna
Mand sour
Not mondsour
मंदसौर
Dhanyavaad aapka sahi ucchaaran btane ke liye, aage see dhyaan rakhunga 🙏
@@JayVardhanSingh आभार, इस पर ध्यान देने व इसे सही spirit में लेने के लिए।
First comment
Jnu muslims words must be removed
I think Aulikara were the Gujjars.
Bro torman and mihirkul was gujjar 😂
What you saying
Gujjar will fight each other
Never possible
Means without any evidence just on the basis of your thinking you named aulikaras Gujjars even after evidences are available that the aulikaras were Aulakh jats
Great thumbnail
Cheat
öncesi hariç 3000 yıl yazılı tarih boyunca biz hunlar her istediğimizde bütün hindistanı aynı çin ülkesini kullandığımız gibi aynı persler ve romalılar gibi kullandık ve faydalandık tıpkı kurtların koyun sürülerine saldırması gibi istediğimiz ne varsa aldık. topraklarınız hiç bir işimize yaramazki neden istila edelim ? baharat tarımını en iyi hintliler icra ediyor.. pirinç ve ipeği çinlilerin, sirke ,tuz ,şarap, tahıl, kadın ve et ihtiyacımızı karşılamayı roma ve farsların icra ettiği gibi. zaten atlarımızın boynundaki kayışları bağladığımız tahta kazıkları çaktığımız her toprak parçası bizim oldu tüm tarih boyunca..karşımızdaki ordu çok kalabalık ise geri çekiliriz, bizim amacımız koyun eti yemek çoban eti değil
"Your lands are of no use to us, why should we invade? "
yay the huns just happened to leave behind there coins in India. And all those kings just made up a story about reclaiming territorry lost to hunas. The huna invasion of India was also mentioned in chinese and indian sources and it almost singlehandedly led to fall of guptas and rise of pushyabhutis. There are multiple Rajput clans that are descended from hunas.
"our aim is to eat mutton, not shepherd's meat"
apparently also destroying buddha stupas and monstaries
"we"
no one knows if hunas were turks, mongols or any other altaic group.
Typical edgy Turk