Why Cinestill made 400D? || Opinion

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
  • Support the channel:
    / nicosphotographyshow
    Donate here:
    www.paypal.com...
    Website:
    www.nicosphoto...
    Follow me on Instagram:
    / nicolasllasera
    Follow me on Twitter:
    / nicolasllasera
    Link to the film I use:
    Color film:
    Kodak Color Plus: amzn.to/2HKjJlC
    Kodak Gold: amzn.to/2Ovb1YT
    Kodak Ultramax: amzn.to/2CEN1hy
    Kodak Proimage 100: amzn.to/2uuSNxA
    Kodak Ektar:
    35mm: amzn.to/2WtufAW
    120: amzn.to/2JZD30n
    4x5: amzn.to/2Wvu2NL
    8x10: amzn.to/2WvtLdH
    Kodak Portra 160:
    35mm: amzn.to/2FJyzW3
    120: amzn.to/2U7gVpj
    4x5: amzn.to/2FGNG2B
    8x10: amzn.to/2FGOswD
    Kodak Portra 400:
    35mm: amzn.to/2WEQnZq
    120: amzn.to/2WEQKDi
    4x5: amzn.to/2WERckY
    8x10: amzn.to/2HQFdx9
    Kodak Portra 800:
    35mm: amzn.to/2HRwP0s
    120: amzn.to/2JYhjBZ
    Fuji C200 in 35mm: amzn.to/2HSskme
    Fuji Superia in 35mm: amzn.to/2JXbncb
    Fuji 400H:
    35mm: amzn.to/2U7rHMh
    120: amzn.to/2HR1Hy5
    Black and white film:
    Ilford Hp5:
    35mm: amzn.to/2JXC8NL
    120: amzn.to/2HRUJJm
    4x5: amzn.to/2WAPsJj
    Ilford Fp4:
    35mm: amzn.to/2WCZNob
    120: amzn.to/2WDQeVU
    4x5: amzn.to/2uADrYy
    Kodak Trix:
    35mm: amzn.to/2uBoOEg
    120: amzn.to/2WGI7Ip
    4x5: amzn.to/2HQY2As
    Kodak Tmax 400:
    35mm: amzn.to/2HOUNJX
    120: amzn.to/2JWgfyc
    4x5 50 sheets: amzn.to/2WEHuiA
    Kodak Tmax 100:
    35mm: amzn.to/2CJd8Uf
    120: amzn.to/2FQ6uhb
    4x5 50 sheets: amzn.to/2HSZLVK
    Kodak Tmax P3200: amzn.to/2WJ7p8R
    Developing gear:
    Developing tank: amzn.to/2HPw6Nj
    Changing Bag: amzn.to/2U9AQny
    My video gear:
    My "Store": www.amazon.com...
    Main Camera: amzn.to/2CMZJdS
    B Camera: amzn.to/2EM3wMa
    Good mic: amzn.to/2CHbKCD
    Small mic: amzn.to/2CEjOEa
    Lav mic: amzn.to/2CFGZ0J
    Recorder: amzn.to/2qf5CK9
    Disclaimer: This video contains affiliate links, which means if you click on one of the product links I may receive a small commission. This is a great way to support this TH-cam channel at no additional cost to you.
    #nicosphotographyshow #filmphotography #film

ความคิดเห็น • 77

  • @albacase
    @albacase 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    400D in 220 would be a dream and since it would be the only US option it would probably sell like crazy

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I miss the 220 days, it was so fun to shoot it on 6x7 and get 20 or 21 frames out of it.

  • @theangrymarmot8336
    @theangrymarmot8336 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I was so glad to see this get released. It is the cheapest color 4x5 (25 sheets for $109 vs ~75 for ten sheets in Kodak.) I have been only shooting B&W with my large format.

  • @MrBenjy2006
    @MrBenjy2006 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I would probably shoot more 800t if it was significantly less than Portra, as a fun alternative. But with prices as high as they are now, why would anyone not just buy Portra, or Gold 200 for that matter.
    Another cool thing Cinestill does is make accessories/developing accessible and easy to understand. I use their water heater and easy c41 chemistry and it’s great.
    I did get bummed with all the patent bully stuff going on, and I still think about that. I do think it has affected my buying of Cinestill product. But in the grand scheme I think there are far more egregious and unnecessary patents than a random film number. So meh.

  • @PalKrammer
    @PalKrammer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Thank you for your perspective - describing the "big picture" of the world of analog photography and film production.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks! I try to expand what we sometimes miss from our small niche.

  • @BrycePinson
    @BrycePinson 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A fast color film in 4x5 that is affordable is important. I just shot the first 4 sheets of my kickstarter box.
    My experience with it in 120 suggests that the halation won’t be a huge problem as you go up in format.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thats good to know, need to pick up a box when its back in stock.

  • @WesleyVerhoevePhotography
    @WesleyVerhoevePhotography 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    My least favorite thing about the world of analog film is people who have literally no idea about the complexity of running a business like this having all kinds of opinions on it. People questioning the motivations, saying things can be cheaper, etc. all without the burden of actual in-depth knowledge of what it takes to keep this field even going.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      True, if people knew how hard it is to make film photography a sustainable business they wouldnt say the same things. From cameras to repairs, chemicals, labs, etc... its not easy.

  • @AndrewJacksonSE
    @AndrewJacksonSE 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I would bet that most film shooters have no idea about the process of getting film produced and finished (noting that "finished" means cut, rolled and packaged), let alone the distribution. Cinestill isn't my style, but I went in on the 400D pre-order as we need to be supporting the whole production chain of film if we hope to keep it alive.

    • @WesleyVerhoevePhotography
      @WesleyVerhoevePhotography 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      facts

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree, its quite a complex situation. Maybe worth a cool video with graphics and such about how it all works.

  • @extremelydave
    @extremelydave 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Unlike everyone seeming to enjoy bashing people and knocking them down, I an glad to see a ray of light here. Nico has been around the block a TON of times and knows the ropes inside and out. I for one am very glad he is still here.

    • @TheKyleealy
      @TheKyleealy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think they deserve their flowers for their contribution to the industry, but people aren't bashing them for no reason.

    • @StymyParsley
      @StymyParsley 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheKyleealyyeah lol people are bashing them for trying to trademark 800T. It’s literally just a descriptive term for a specific type of film and they’re bullying smaller distributors. Of course they deserve hate.

  • @StarLightDotPhotos
    @StarLightDotPhotos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm new to film and I only know about them because they have the DF96 monobath. That was the first chemistry I used and I am glad they are around.

  • @briansegarra9312
    @briansegarra9312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Any " affordable " large format color film is always a great idea

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Saludos Brian!!

    • @briansegarra9312
      @briansegarra9312 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NicosPhotographyShow Saludos espero, que todo valla bien por alla !

  • @areallyrealisticguyd4333
    @areallyrealisticguyd4333 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I know more people shooting 4x5 than ever before, but we're talking YOUNG people like 16-30. we really do need some kind of cheaper options for color sheet film and while Cinestill and reflx lab did take a step forward in that aspect it would be nice if Kodak themselves supported that community more. If they released gold 200 in medium format, then obviously the next step up is 4x5.

  • @wearetrackclub
    @wearetrackclub 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Solid points! Really interesting to hear your perspective 👏

  • @jmguitarnavy
    @jmguitarnavy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry if it's a bit unrelated, but does anyone have any news about the Orwo NC200 film that's supposed to release this year? Nico mentioned it looked more normal than the others and I'd love to give it a go when/if it finally hits the shelves. Great content, love your videos.

  • @Co1eTr4in84
    @Co1eTr4in84 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Cinestil has been a great help in the film resurgence and should get praise for all that work,. We all make mistakes, key to to learn and move forward.

    • @jw48335
      @jw48335 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      If they had learned from their mistakes, they would relinquish their patent on 800T, an ill-gotten patent that should never have been granted on a technical term. Until they kill that patent, they obviously have not learned their lesson.

    • @Co1eTr4in84
      @Co1eTr4in84 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jw48335 its more complicated than just relinquishing the patent. I think it was not needed on all the patent stuff but its undeniable that they made 800T a thing to the an average film user.

  • @FredStoverink
    @FredStoverink 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’m biased, but I think CineStill is incredible.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They do good stuff, not my kind of film stock but they are a good option to have.

  • @CrispyFrenFry
    @CrispyFrenFry 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love shooting film, primarily in 35mm and 120 but Cinestill has never been a vendor whose products called to me. I’d be more than happy to see them go bust after they showed their greed by preventing others from accomplishing the same generic (not trade secret or proprietary) process to generate greater competition in the market.

  • @markwalkerphotography
    @markwalkerphotography 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great news and brings colour into the affordable (ish) bracket. Though, personally I've never developed colour at home!

  • @Zetaphotography
    @Zetaphotography 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is this the end for this channel?

  • @nev.catalyst7478
    @nev.catalyst7478 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    love cinestill, hate any angry mob. no one is perfect

  • @doozledumbler5393
    @doozledumbler5393 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did they try to trademark 400D yet?

  • @andrewbarnum5040
    @andrewbarnum5040 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We are still trying to figure out what 400D is exactly. It's base is purple like all ECN-2, most of us guess it's 250D except Cinestill says it's not 250D. So what is it if it's not 250D? There are not many options and they don't have the ability to make their own film. Personally I think they are flat out lying and it is 250D only because all other options seem very unlikely.

    • @eatfrog
      @eatfrog 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It 100% is 250D. Cinestill marketing is just saying marketing stuff.

    • @andrewbarnum5040
      @andrewbarnum5040 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@eatfrog until someone who knows for sure what it is, I don't think anyone can say 100% so let's just say there is a 99% chance it's 250D.

    • @hkleinespel
      @hkleinespel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think they are using the same emulsion as 250d, but Kodak sells them master rolls without any Remjet applied to the back of the film. So technically it’s not 250d where they remove the Remjet, because it just wasn’t added to begin with.

    • @andrewbarnum5040
      @andrewbarnum5040 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@hkleinespel Remjet does not define a film stock. It's 250D with or without Remjet

    • @heatonize
      @heatonize 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's not "re-spooled" 250D. They cut the film and spool it themselves from a giant 250D wholesale roll. the emulsion is 250D but it was never branded or cut by kodak as such, so cinestill takes the credit.

  • @MarcS4R
    @MarcS4R 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i tried 400d but i did not like the color rendering in natural light.

  • @moot6794
    @moot6794 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    (Money. They made it for money.)

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought we are all into film for the passion, who wants to pay bills, not me!

  • @andydreadsbmx
    @andydreadsbmx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good to hear some history and insight along with overall being optimistic about the film industry. Mistakes happen and not everything that companies do is going to be the right choice. Complaining about prices up and down is not going to fix anything, yes it could be cheaper but then that is less money to build upon getting more film created (yes it could be going into the pockets of those making it but we don't know). Overall I buy Cinestill film and I enjoy the results. From a professional standpoint, getting perfectly clean results from film is almost pointless if you ask me. High end professional work can be shot digitally and emulated while leaving film for a more artistic result.

  • @markmoodywv
    @markmoodywv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love cinestill! Id be curious to see what else they have in the pipeline.

    • @heatonize
      @heatonize 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      waiting for the E100 sales

  • @erichstocker8358
    @erichstocker8358 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I prefer the Refxlab 4x5 because it is aerocolor which I greatly prefer for look and no halation. I do not think that any company can own a designation like 800T. That isn't a trademark but a ISO and color designation

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hope to one day make a proper video on that situation.

  • @JamieMPhoto
    @JamieMPhoto 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    The amount of willful ignorance and determined hate for Cinestill is absurd. I'm pretty over it, even if they're definitely not perfect.

    • @theangrymarmot8336
      @theangrymarmot8336 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, I didn't see it as that big of a deal. People these days will get their thongs tangled for anything. I have been buying from cinestill for years - and it has always been a good experience, and I bought some of this 4x5 soon as it came out.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed!! Hope all is well Jamie!

    • @Mrpunkluv
      @Mrpunkluv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They sent out cease and desists to small film production companies selling the exact same product… cuz they didn’t like the use of “800 Tungsten” when both films are just washed vision 3 kodak film stocks. Not to mention cinestill handled the situation awfully n practically mocked these small companies. They are scum dude.

    • @ToyStoryNBarneyFan
      @ToyStoryNBarneyFan 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’m gonna say this, yes, I agree that Cinestill has made a bad decision in regard to that situation that happened months ago and I understand the frustrations people have with them. At the same time though, I’ll play devil’s advocate and say from a business standpoint, I’d understand why Cinestill sent the letters, and this isn’t saying what they did morally was good but legally, they can. In my personal opinion, while I’m not gonna forget what they did, I still plan on buying their products in the future

    • @adrianemikko
      @adrianemikko 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah the hate they get is too much. After all they have given a lot to the film photography world. But I really think they should not do the trademark thing ever again. It’s not good for the availability of the already dwindling films out there. That said, I’m buying all my 800T and 400D from reflx lab just because they are cheaper. I mean that’s one of the reasons why motion film re-spooling existed right? To be a cheaper alternative.

  • @MakersTeleMark
    @MakersTeleMark 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Cinestill is purely a marketing company. They hire other firms to produce, modify, and finish the film they sell. Plain and simple. Glad 4x5 has another option, but it's a really crappy one at that, even if it is comparatively cheap. It's not as bad a Phoenix, but it's close.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Most companies today (in other industries apart from film) do the same. Most manufacturing companies fail at marketing and its best they stay behind the lines in that case. But Cinestill has done a great job at making a different product available for still photography, even if the main ingredient is not cooked in their kitchen.

  • @NiGauBech7
    @NiGauBech7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yeah… I’m still not supporting CinesShit

  • @mikestanavech7858
    @mikestanavech7858 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Nothing perfected about 800t. Still hot garbage. Garbage company too.

    • @NicosPhotographyShow
      @NicosPhotographyShow  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good to hear your perspective, I havent really shot it myself so cant speak much about the properties of the film.