Is following particular madhab an obligation? Q&A Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- Sheik Uthman Ibn Farook UK tour: Visit Leicester
Questions and answers from lecture: Dawah of the early Salaf and its importance in modern society.
Problems with theory of evolution. Q&A Sheikh Uthman Ibn Farooq
Prophetic Dawah
Calling to the true Islam. Call of all the Prophets. Dawah Leicester UK worldwide. Distribution of Qur'an and materials in different languages.
www.propheticdawah.info
@prophetic_dawah Instagram.
@propheticdawa Facebook page.
@propheticdawahofficial TH-cam Chanel.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | นางเอกหมอลำเงินล้าน "อุ๋งอิ๋ง เพชรบ้านแพง" & ไฮโซสาวสุดฮอต "ลิลลี่ เหงียน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jPxQS_EgrJ4/mqdefault.jpg)
Amazingly said
I do agree with what Shaykh said
Honestly i respect sheikh Utthman.. But brother we are not mujtaheed.. We are layman so its important to follow 1 school of thought.. Abu Hanifa name is Nauman...
But it's not obligated
@@arfaatdesai6067 it's not obligated.. But are you gonna give education to your kids at home or ur gonna send them to top school so that they can get the best.. Likewise wen someone in ur family gets sick you don't open medicine book and cure them, you take them to hospital...
@@Azamkhan-yv5th that's why you should follow a Sheikh who gives you fatwa according to your situation. And you should follow it without wondering which madhab he follows. Because as a layman you don't have any madhab.
@@arfaatdesai6067 i have a madhab and i follow that madhab cuz my sheikh is also following thay madhab...
These words of him speaking show that he does not belong to madhhab. And what they hide is the madhhab leaders are mujtahids, we are mukalids. If we have to consider following Quran and the sunnah directly, then we are not suppose to have positions jn the society today such as "lawyers", "professors", "engineers" and so on. If everyone was able to learn and practice directly from the source, most of the high end professional will be of no use. Then why we have them?
So basically, at 5mins he his saying for ordinary people find scholar you trust and respect and follow his teachings but don't follow a Madhab. Essentially teaching that "go follow modern day man and his Madhab because he gives you daleel and evidence but don't follow the great Imams of Fiqh and the great Jurists of Islamic Jurisprudence. Uthman bin Farooq.... We say to you" no thank you brother " we would much rather follow a whole galaxy of scholars who have delved into the evidenfes of the Qur'an and Hadith to establish the methodology of practising Islam e.g. Salah
In order to understand the minhaj(Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the Salaf properly you must adhere to qualified scholarship and you will only find that in a school of Islamic jurisprudence
Wrong
@@FaizanQadri-rb6eu educate me by all means
@@FaizanQadri-rb6eu I’ll wait 🫤
@@Gog3453 maybe you weren’t clear enough. But firstly, theres no such things as qualification in Islamic knowledge, we know these things didnt exist in the time of the Prophet. Secondly, if we adhere to islamic school of thought we have already closed the gates to the wider access of knowledge out there. We have cancelled out 6 books of hadith and even more that cover every single topic in Islam.
@@FaizanQadri-rb6eu adherents to the minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the Salaf is what makes qualified scholarship. What in the Wahhabism are you talking about
Nothing wrong with following madahibs and sticking to their fiqhi opinions, they have their own Usuls and evidences(i.e adillahs) from the Quran and Sunnah.
It's all a question of USUL and extracting rulings from the text with them, salafis have their own and madahibs have their own. Nothing to do with "not following the dalil".
- An ex-salafi/dhahiri
Which madhab goes against the the quran and sunna?
none of the four madhabs
It's a neo-salafi rethoric against following a madahibs.
Each schools of thought have their own usuls when extracting rulings from the text, the same goes with the neo-salafi/dhahiri of today.
not every situation.
for example the issue nulifier wudu, the 3 mazhab (hanifi, maliki, syafie) says it is not nulify wudhu if someone eat camel meat but hanabilah said it is nulify due to hadith sahih. in this situation it is obligatary follow the sahih hadith of the prophet.
You spread misunderstanding about madhab ahle sunna, how it is possible for Common man to extract information from quran and sunna
So the madhahib don’t have evidences? Confusing to me
Salaam alaikum, so no he never said that, he said that if a madhab were to go against the Quran or Sunnah than to reject the information as the Quran and Sunnah come first. With that information he also said that it's really good to follow a madhab but all he said is that it's not obligatory to
@zackariahamideh which of the 4 madhahib go against the Qur'an and sunnah? In usul al-Fiqh, what are the 1st 2 primary sources do all these madhahib follow?
Madhab were established after the death of the prophet (s.a.w.) At the time of the 4 prominent imaams, not every authentic hadith was avaliable to them. So some of the rulings whitin these schools of thought aren't based on authentic hadith. Because when they lacked evidence from the hadith, they had to use logic and the information avaliable to them to make rulings.
Lets take the Hanafi madhab for example. It was formed 150 years after the death of our beloved prophet (s.a.w.). Abu Hanifa (RA) was one of the smartest people who has every lived. However, he didn't travel and he didn't have access to alot of authentic information. This means that Abu Hanifa (RA) had to use logic to form many of his opinions. This is also the reason why the Hanafi school of thought contradicts many authentic hadith. Abu Hanifa said to his followers; that whenever they heard an authentic hadith, his own opinion then becomes irrelevant.
The point is that some rulings within the schools of thought contradict the authentic Sunnah. This was simply because the scholars at the time were limited to the authentic information available to them at the time and place.
What the sheikh basically points out is that someone who is not a scholar should follow a madhab. But when they see an authentic hadith that contradicts the ruling of their madhab, they should follow the authentic Sunnah above their own madhab on this matter
@@tvp06i your information about the formation of the Hanafi madhab if factually incorrect. The imam of the school died 150 hijri, born 80 hijri. By the time of imam Abu Hanafa's death, the school was already established. That is the reason why he had more students than the remaining 3 mujtahid imams.
@thijn7358 give some examples of rulings that go against authentic ahadith. The science of hadith is such thst what was authentic during imam Abu Hanifa and imam Malik could become weak due to weak narrators.
Give us examples of Hanafi rulings thst are against hadith
He is not a sheikh where did he become a sheikh whoch madrasha scholar declared hom a sheikh no one
Yes he is a Sheikh. He's very knowledgeable Allahuma barik. If ur genuinely interested in knowing more about him and his qualifications than search his channel "One Message Foundation" or "Masjid Ribat" for his dawah videos.
He studied 15 years.... He has a masters of hadeeth from madina university. He is a student of knowledge not a sheikh though
Shaykh can also be a title given to someone elderly or someone of knowledge
The literal meaning is elder which is an honourable title
Being a sheik level and Ulemma level to different things bro.