This is a useful rocket, especially when it is semi-automatically guided like this!!! We in Serbian 🇷🇸 army have new Malyutka 2T thermobaric 3000m and Malyutka 2T5 large cumulative ranges of 5000m, all sami-automatically guided and with termovision (night) capability launchers!!! She still destroys everything she needs!!!
@@javiergonzalez12138 it can be seen that you do not understand weapons, unlike the old ones, these are bigger, have a longer top, 8 matching motors instead of 4!!! The old ones are manually operated (by hand) while now they are semi automatic without any effort, you just place a cross where the rocket will hit!!! Many, many differences!!!🤌🙄😎😎😎
@@javiergonzalez12138 Javier my friend do you ever seen a regular Malyutka 1 Soviet anti tank rocket, and if you are then you will notice the differences in the rocket itself and in the way of guiding on!!!
@@Lee-sf1dvI guess they just don't get rid of anything and they're still using these more props to them if they can safely do it I just think there's more effective and modern atgms out there but if this is cheap and in mass quantities still around I guess no point in letting it go to waste it would be good for training use
These look awfully like the Malutka. Which is 60 years old. And I think I can see the cable unspooling at 1:02. Nothing wrong with cables, they are impossible to detect by the target, unlike beams for the beam guided missiles, but they are harder to control.
Wire guided ATGM’s are no harder to guide than beam riding ATGM’s as long as they are SACLOS guided. The original Malyutka is MCLOS guided so it would be harder to guide onto the target but the Chinese HJ-73 is an upgraded Malyutka with SACLOS guidance as well as a tandem warhead. Most online sources cite a penetration capability of 750+ mm RHA before ERA. This is comparable with many modern ATGM’s and is still very capable. The only downside is that the Malyutka is generally a lot slower than newer ATGM’s.
@@electroshock5501 You are right. And if the target can't easily detect the missile due to no beam (I suppose the strobe light is only visible from the rear), maybe the slow speed does not matter either. Still, the video has a wrong title. Some of the translations are suspect, like one of their other videos talking about a "marching speed" of a missile. Direct Chinese translations, I guess.
The HJ-73 was originally a copy of the Malyutka deployed on the Chinese “zbd86” which is a bmp-1 copy. This is just an upgraded, modernised version iirc, however still wire guided.
Yes but it is extremely cheap. One Javelin is probably over 100K,.This Malyutka is probably less then 10K. Many countries do not have huge military budgets and this Malyutka with all its shortcomings can be still usefully in Africa. It cannot penetrate newest tanks but there are a lot of T-55 around the world.
>new smart chinese ATGM
>SACLOS
>safer
>accurate
>deadly
>look inside box
>AT3 Sagger........
9m14 my beloved
Malyutka is a good weapon
@@avus-kw2f213 20y ago yes.Today no. Too slow (120 m/s), short range (3000m) and questionable penetration.
@@nextel1275 I think its biggest problem is the training required
以中國目前的綜合工業能力，武器裝備水平，軍事人員素質和科技研發水平，要用軍事手段徵服烏克蘭這樣的國家不用一年便可以搞掂。
For live missile firing training only, the AT3 no longer in frontline. These missiles can be deposed!
This is a useful rocket, especially when it is semi-automatically guided like this!!! We in Serbian 🇷🇸 army have new Malyutka 2T thermobaric 3000m and Malyutka 2T5 large cumulative ranges of 5000m, all sami-automatically guided and with termovision (night) capability launchers!!! She still destroys everything she needs!!!
@@danicao.6778this chinese missle looks like old maljutka not the modernized
@@javiergonzalez12138 it can be seen that you do not understand weapons, unlike the old ones, these are bigger, have a longer top, 8 matching motors instead of 4!!! The old ones are manually operated (by hand) while now they are semi automatic without any effort, you just place a cross where the rocket will hit!!! Many, many differences!!!🤌🙄😎😎😎
@@danicao.6778 im talking about the chinese missle lmao not the modernized serbian 😭 China has way better anti tank missles
@@javiergonzalez12138 Javier my friend do you ever seen a regular Malyutka 1 Soviet anti tank rocket, and if you are then you will notice the differences in the rocket itself and in the way of guiding on!!!
not beam guided. There's wire and flare.
This is about as old as they can get this is 1950s 1960s design
😂当年为了防止苏联入侵，造太多了，训练根本用不完
@@Lee-sf1dvI guess they just don't get rid of anything and they're still using these more props to them if they can safely do it I just think there's more effective and modern atgms out there but if this is cheap and in mass quantities still around I guess no point in letting it go to waste it would be good for training use
These look awfully like the Malutka. Which is 60 years old. And I think I can see the cable unspooling at 1:02. Nothing wrong with cables, they are impossible to detect by the target, unlike beams for the beam guided missiles, but they are harder to control.
Wire guided ATGM’s are no harder to guide than beam riding ATGM’s as long as they are SACLOS guided. The original Malyutka is MCLOS guided so it would be harder to guide onto the target but the Chinese HJ-73 is an upgraded Malyutka with SACLOS guidance as well as a tandem warhead. Most online sources cite a penetration capability of 750+ mm RHA before ERA. This is comparable with many modern ATGM’s and is still very capable. The only downside is that the Malyutka is generally a lot slower than newer ATGM’s.
@@electroshock5501 You are right. And if the target can't easily detect the missile due to no beam (I suppose the strobe light is only visible from the rear), maybe the slow speed does not matter either.
Still, the video has a wrong title. Some of the translations are suspect, like one of their other videos talking about a "marching speed" of a missile. Direct Chinese translations, I guess.
The HJ-73 was originally a copy of the Malyutka deployed on the Chinese “zbd86” which is a bmp-1 copy. This is just an upgraded, modernised version iirc, however still wire guided.
@@nikolatasev4948 It use a flare instead a strobe like TOW.
This is litterally a SACLOS Malyutka why are you calling it smart lmao
These would be useful in Ukraine
bros are 40 years late to the party
they actually using red arrow javelin copy
Yes but it is extremely cheap. One Javelin is probably over 100K,.This Malyutka is probably less then 10K. Many countries do not have huge military budgets and this Malyutka with all its shortcomings can be still usefully in Africa. It cannot penetrate newest tanks but there are a lot of T-55 around the world.
2024-1963=61.。。这个导弹叫做63式导弹
@@qianjinTV 61 years late to the party 😭
Gywmy yn afganistan 600000 many selim emini2710980420021 many swicerland ❤❤
GYWMY IN BOSNA 30000 IN SLOVENIA30000 IN HERVACKA 30000 IN KOSOVO 30000 IN MACEDONIA 10000 MANY SELIM EMINI 27101980420021