Hello. I am an Iranian and I am proud that our specialists and engineers are fighting against difficult conditions and trying to build a jet. Can you build a fighter on your own even though you are under sanctions for 50 years? We let it go and look ahead. America once had nothing when Elman defeated them, which they had never seen before. Russia once learned the technology of making fighters from Russia from their father and from China, but to Iran. No one helps
Tbh as an aircraft designer the intakes on the top with no s ducts is not a huge issue. They will be mainly shielded by ground radar, the more concerning issue would be boundary layer ingestion into the engine. Considering this is an issue that still plagues nations with far bigger budgets I would have to pull the bs card on this design.
The plane must have literally no high alpha qualities other than dropping like a stone. That's speaking as an aero engineer (qualified as one, not working as one!) Overall, it's not a serious project and seems to be designed for its own domestic audience to feel proud about. What else could it be?
Something tells me the intakes look like that because it might not be a supersonic jet. The engines may still be the Iranian Owj turbojet with afterburners but just like the mig17, those afterburners are just there for some extra thrust for better payload capacity for take-off and climb rate. Not really for sustained supersonic flight.
You know whats most impressive about this video? That they made a CGI model where a pilot actually fits in the cockpit, unlike the "real" life version of this Iranian jet
...the small size of the cockpit makes me think this thing is actually a suicide bomber, manned by a child soldier... ...a stealthy "Martyr's Bomber" carrying a couple of suitcase nukes...
@@miklosernoehazy8678 Well thank you for that lovely image. I was worried I would sleep soundly tonight...... But yeah I really would not put it passed the Iranian government.
Sure I give props to Cuba's mechanics for keeping their cars going but that is mostly a testament to American car quality in the 60's. And I still wouldn't bet that Cuba can make a F1 car.
@@amazingmonkey886 Car and Jet technology have very different developments. A car from today will be in almost every way better than the ones from the 60s. An F35 and an F14, not so much- in fact, there are things that the F14 does much better than the F35 like speed and maneuverability. Even in terms of stealth, the US developed more stealthy jets in the 80s. Rocket, space, and aircraft engineering have not changed much since the 1950s when you compare it to automobile engineering. In 1969 the US landed on the moon, how much has the US space program developed since then?
Yes their Aircrafts didn't because human body is incapable of pulling more G force so that's limiting but their effiency to reach further destinations and most importantly the weapon systems surely hella did...by a lot @@hhaaddiizzffaarr
Iran's projects are always ridiculed, but when they are unveiled, the world goes into shock. Just like the hypersonic and intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Here’s the thing: if they go even further into the anhedral design, specifically making the wings hull wings, they’ll get a few advantages. Of those that I can remember off the top of my head: a) the ability to shield underwing external stores from radar and b) by using gull wings in conjunction with all-moving wing tips, one can eliminate the need for the vertical tail and rudders. Furthermore, all-moving wing tips can ease design complexity and reduce maintenance costs by moving all wing surface controls to the wingtips, which also has the added benefit of increased roll performance. In terms of the air intakes, they could theoretically could’ve put radar baffles in the air intakes and we just can’t see them, but this is just me spitballing at this point Requesting videos on the following: -switchblade aircraft designs such as the FA-37 Talon from the ‘05 movie “Stealth” or the X-02 Wyvern from the Ace Combat franchise -Super Tomcat-21 and ASF-14 -the NATF program as a whole -early ATF proposals -Sea Apache -F-20 Tigershark -Bae SABA -Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Bomber proposal
I'm Iranian. This thing is just a hoax. All of the budget is directed toward missiles and drones. Including stealth drones. And So far is working. I mean HIMARS is like our fateh missile and the drones are just ours!!! So... I can't fault them for not focusing on manned jets
The advantage of losing a fly-by-wire system is that in the event of an EMP, whether generated from a nuclear detonation or otherwise, means that the pilot could keep flying whereas the control might be knocked out for other pilots depending on the protection of their aircraft!
Not keep flying, but able to perform a controlled glide to the ground instead of uncontrolled tumbling out of the sky. Every other computer controlled system in the plane would be knocked out, but at least the stick will still move the control surfaces.
(Compare this with Automatic stick shift and Manual) 1-Anti EMP...(That means when EMP strikes, you can control your plane) 2-Cheaper to make , electronics are more expansive to make.
Exactly! EMP won't work on some of the planes making your tank , car , fully Electronic is kind of bad.. maybe a hybrid.. because EMP will take you out in a heart beat... hell even solar storm can devistate the society if unprepared.! @@Ryan_Winter If youre jet well equepped to reflect solar storm you will withstand some of emp but that's expansive! and idk if you can actually install it on your plane
@JZ's BFF I mean, canvas and plywood was used for the Horten Ho 229 which had a smaller radar cross section than a Spitfire or Mustang. The materials absorb radar waves instead of bouncing them back i think
@JZ's BFF dummy or fake vehicles are still being used for deception as of today. Like Ukrainians are using wooden mock ups of HIMARS launchers and inflatable tanks to deceive the Russians
@JZ's BFF you the one sitting up here pretending like Japan was this great deceiver they didn't even realize their codes had been broken just like Iran ain't got nowhere neat a stealth fighter
Hmm, when discussing the inlets for the engines, two things come to mind: First of all, yes, they are rather small, but so are the engines. And unless building am combination of RAM jet and conventional turbo jet/turbo fan with afterburner, small engines don´t require large intakes. Second, the hightend position of the intakes should be rather effective against ground based radar, since they can hardly be seen from below. Therefore, the designers might have had a higher interest in optimizing the stealth characteristics concerning ground radar compared to airbased radar systems. Finally, there was the question of why it might be wanted to be wanted to have a plane with the capability of using manual controls instead of a fly-by-wire system. First of all, this means that there is a high degree of redundancy and savety: A plane, that can be flow manually, will be more likely to survive once the electronics fail, e.g. when being hit by bullets or shrapnel or as a result of an EMP: not every country has EMP hardened electronics at hand. These two aspects of the design make me wonder, if the aircraft might be a ground attacker and/ or optimized of use in a conflict that includes nuclear weapons.
Again, the FBW system is only 1 of hundreds of systems in the jet. Unless this is just a reskinned pre-coldwar jet, an EMP will kill everything in the jet except the ability to control the glide to the ground. Not exactly helpful. But as you said, when the iranian electronics likely fail, the pilot would be able to still control what is left still functioning on the jet.
Ground attack? With two bombs of capacity and no internal guns? Nah. If anything it's an interceptor, but they didn't properly plan for decreasing the signature other aircraft's radar. But I'm leaning hard towards it being fake or nearly completely useless.
I would love to know what happens when you fly at increased angle of attack and the air stalls in the inlets. Be that is what will happen. You will suffocate the engines and stall them, then you stall and pancake into the desert at terminal (for you) velocity.
The rest of the world: We want our jets to be stealthy and be supermaneuverable so that it can do the Pugachev's Cobra and the falling leaf... Iran: I want a jet with funny angles Iran is built different
I was just coming into the comments to say that! It'll choke the engines out due to lack of air. So either this aircraft is BS or they plan to NEVER aggressively climb or dogfight. I'm going with the former. It's all nonsense with mockups to look like they're advanced without putting any money or effort into it. It worked for soviet Russia, but it's definitely not gonna work for them.
Manual control is an advantage since it is immune from electronic jamming. This fighter actually looks perfect for dog fights which is needed for defending a land rather than attacking as does the US. I remember the time people saying Iranian ballistic missiles were Photoshop.... Now Iran has one of the most diverse and biggest arsenals in the world. Same as the Iranian drone inventory.
I like how the Iranian airbase guards are so stupid they didn't think Maverick and Rooster were sus running around the tarmac in obvious American gear.
@@vindictivegrind9370 maybe not-I was thinking about this, and part of their MO is to copy us Americans, so perhaps their flight suits are similar and they color their helmets to look cool.
Hypothetically speaking, I think the reason why the Iranians probably went for manual controls is that they might be aware/afraid that they lack the sufficient means to counter advanced electronic warfare systems that many modern fighters are equipped with.
Their domestic missiles, drones and loitering munitions obviously have no manual controls as they lack pilots. Seems weird to trust missiles to not suffer from EW and then fear that electronic shielding is insufficient.
@@bluesnjax9134 this is a more likely scenario, but it seems like a really outdated way to handle the problem. However it would be an economical way to handle it. My question is, why would that be such a concern for the designers of this plane? Nuclear bombs are the only realistic source of an emp powerful enough to disrupt fly by wire. Is Iran developing a tiny short range stealth strategic bomber? This would match up well with the mechanical controls and air intake location.
@@Typexviiib I dont know shit about EMPS but wouldnt that fry the aircrafts APU and it would lose power supply for ignition of fuel? I would imagine all electronics would be useless making the fighter only good for landing or unguided gun runs and MAYBE un guided bombs or rockets if they also designed them to not need electronic control systems. Radar would fry i think too. IR and radar seeker heads in your missiles would be toast. But I guess if you can get the aircraft home safely it can be repaired and used again.
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 I have always been amazed by Iran's drone development but your questionable profile picture makes it hard for me to believe you are not a government bot. Seriously, are you that petty regarding Israel?
@@josephc.9520 they own the media thats why you think they are not bad its an old saying that a jew will hit you while crying and screaming like they are being hit they killed our scientists people snd still are attacking our country none stop they literally support separatists against my country why should i be a government bot to hate the enemy?! actually my profile is not even 1% of what i really feel about them
Just as Iranians didn't saw stealth drone RQ170 flying. OH WAIT? They did and they stole it from stupid overconfident Yanks, landed it in the middle of their air base and inspected the entire thing screw by screw. Now they spanking Ukraine so hard on it's arse, that type of red hot glow is sufficient to bake a cake. HAHA!
I'm certainly laughing at the silly premise of this video...Iran is now gonna go from 50 year old F-14's with no replacement parts to stealth? While under heavy sanctions... right, and I have a bridge to sell too. Silly stuff for idiots is what this channel produces.
@@michaelwheeler2275 Iran has tiny little plastic boats and a bunch of missiles, that's about it. I'm more afraid of my neighbors dog (he's a Chihuahua) than I am of anything Iran has in its military.
@@michaelfried3123 Iran does have its own locally made frigates and semi heavy submarines. They also made what seems to be a reverse engineered version of the Russian supercavitating torpedo. Something the US Navy doesn't have. U can underestimate them all u want, but it aint smart to underestimate someone that much.
Iran already sort of does have stealth jets, but they're unmanned, few in numbers, and fewer of them are actually armed with nothing more than air to ground weapons. Not to say they couldn't design a stealth fighter of their own, but it'll take a lot of resources and time to do so, even if they have technical assistance from China and Russia.
@@supermaster2012 No, like actual surveillance drones like the Shahed 171 Simorgh and Shahed Saegheh. They both come in armed and unarmed configurations and are both probably flying over Ukraine right now in support of Russian troops. Most military drones use a lot of off the shelf equipment to reduce costs, since most military drones are meant to be disposable anyway.
Absolutely. Just think what would happen to the US airfleet if our computers were hacked/infected or rendered inoperable via EMP. You could still fly the F4's and some Tomcats (we probably have quite a few that could be made flight capable relatively quickly) I think. Any others in the US fleet that are candidates?
I agree 100% with it cant be hacked but it can be broke visa vie physical damage. All of this is moot as Iran is not capable of building a gen 5 or 6 stealth fighter plane. They harvested more info on aeronautics from this very comments section than they ever did reverse engineering f-5s, f-14s, and some recent drones they have been able to capture.
Haha yea I doubt they are thinking about using their Mach shockwave to make travel more efficient lol. I would be surprised if that thing could even break the sound barrier.
@JZ's BFF yeah, XB-70 usually don’t drop the tip until passing supersonic. It don’t need be adjusted during wave riding like swing-wings. The reason for not droop the wingtip is for higher aspect ratio and improved low speed performance.
It's a start is what it is. I don't think it will fly but it is something for Iran to gain experience with. They will learn from it and come up with ideas to work within their means. I live in Canada and wish my government would have the balls to start a fighter program and build up an aviation industry from there instead of relying on everyone else.
who knows maybe that fighter jet is equipped with an emp weapon that disables their enemy and when that happens, it disorients their enemy long enough to eliminate them
They decided to power it with engines America designed in 1956 for the T-38 trainer,later becoming the F-5 tiger☺️probably the best part of the plane 😄
Lol amazing what you can do with an F5, some cardboard boxes and sticky tape, clearly a world beater…some would say the position of the intakes would cause some compressor stall issues during medium to high AOA manouvering, but clearly the genius behind this design took that into account.
Their aircraft's lack of fly-by-wire computer control is not an advantage, no matter what they say. They haven't incorporated it into their jet because they don't have the expertise or (probably) the computer tech necessary to add it. Also, any claim of making the aircraft immune to EMP is ridiculous, because American combat vehicles reliant on computer control and netcentric warfare systems are hardened against EMP effect. If they're concerned about compromised operability due to EMP, it's only because, there too, their technology is lacking.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD The systems would be. Especially given how reliant platforms like F-35 and upwards are on datalinks...a repeat of that would sever the connection with wingmen and leave the whole formation vulnerable (F-35 is a worthless aerodynamic turd by itself and I've zero confidence in it's survivability if forced into a standalone engagement).
2:37 Not necessarily full manual flight, If autonomously managed while manually navigated command, in stealth mode, inertia sensors & memorized geo map, can offer a human pilot stealth free-fly. 7:33 a smaller intake wouldn't necessarily supress air, because it offers ramjet sonic flow advantage, unfortunately the speed potential of the engine purpulstion rate is not demonstrated.
@@supermaster2012 lol, cardboard... It's "literally" CGI no dought. Nobody out of 🇮🇷 flight base has seen it. Was it a comp generated of a cardboard plan? *maybe*
@@saeedfarmanali However, most nations wouldn't sell their military arms supply, unless it's already in the outdated model phase. So far, Iran is doing this in prototype rehearsal. Then again, *maybe* they have something much greater than this model.
Interesting, as an aeronautical engineer I am not entirely convinced by the overall design. There are some aspects to this concept in that it at least gives countries venturing into this area of aerial defence a platform from which to build on. Right now, I think they are a good few years away from service.
@@supermaster2012You have already given an opinion, what do you want now? An approval? don't dump your pent-up childhood trauma of rejection on us. We have shit to do.
Actually just about every US military aircraft will still be flying. And even a lot of consumer electronics and just about every car will also. You'd be surprised about just how much stuff has to be protected from electromagnetic interference.
About the only advantage i could think of not having fly by wire is that it becomes moderately less susceptible to EMPs (which currently can only be generated by high altitude nukes, so… i think you’d have other issues)
Could it be that the current version is just a new skin on an existing F-5 to make it a bit more lik F-14 but with some stealth? Yes, I know it's single tail vs twin tail, but it seems to make sense given what they have to work with, much like Taiwan's IDF looked like a weird mish-mash of F-5, F-16, and F/A-18 (with a dash of some Mirage jets in there) It's clear they don't have the avionics to make a true 5th gen stealth fighter, but can this this be even called 4.5gen? It's likely without radar as well, so it'd be CHEAP compared to a true 5th gen , much like F-5 vs F-14.
From personal experience manual flying is actually slightly better than computerised flying this is because the flying is more down to pilot skill and not AI. But for faster response in a battle situation computerised flying could or could not be delayed when a pilot inputs a manoeuvre this is because the competent has to translate it then input the move but with manual it’s done instantly
An aerodynamically stable design does make sense, if you are lacking the capacities to develop fly-by-wire software, the avionics suite etc. In that case, anyone would try to close the gap, best possible, leaving headaches to the next generation, more time to catch up, included.
2:50 Id argue direct control is always best. Obviously as a last resort back up which is why those features are here in this. Its a bit much but in the modern day of electronic warfare they might have worries about having their fighter's control paths blocked possibly by some electro jamming device. Hey I'm using my brain here. Think about it tho. Thats how drones have been taken out in the past. They jam the flight control or flat out take it over from drones. Why not use the same tech to swat fighters out of the sky.
Because jet fighters are not piloted remotely. Drones are hacked typically by spoofing GPS and telling the drone that it is landing in friendly territory. A pilot inside the aircraft that controls the aircraft will not land simply because the control logic tells him to.
I'm no expert but here goes. FBW and other systems may be beyond their design capability and daily serviceability. What real good is a hangar queen when you need a sortie now. Using parts/engines/weapons that you trust and are available might make sense for a country that changes allies and enemies occasionally. The desire to have a new wave F5/MIG21 I can understand but can they pull it off? That remains to be seen.
Long live Iran .the only 1 unique country which faced heavy western sanctions for almost 50 years and still is building new military technology and rising gradually! Iran 🇮🇷🇮🇷
That plane is tiny and isnt even that stealthy, not to mention that the engines are reverse enginnered (stolen) from the J85 turbojet, WHICH WAS MADE IN THE 1950s
Wow, this Qaher is not only stealthy but also invisible to human eyes and all kinds of radar, infrared, x-ray, gama, etc. The one we see in this video is the only one they make visible.
No fly by wire serves two main purposes: 1. They're sanctioned which makes it hard for them to get components 2. If facing an adversary that has greater technological means analog controls are the safer bet over digital controls systems. ///they probbly dont want to see the flying version of Stux-net.
Funny note, just after you made the comment about the manual control surfaces there was an animated shot of the plane taking off. In this shot a naca duct is clearly visible, these are theoretically low drag intake ducts(haven't seen a lot of experimentation). But why this is funny, particularly with manual controls is that these ducts don't work trans or supersonic. Which would limit the craft to about 600mph if that duct does anything important.
Iran has passed its test in ballistic missiles, drones, tanks, be sure that it will perform in the best way in fighter jets as well. Iran's F313 is very similar to China's FC31, I believe it is a Chinese fighter and Iran wants to assemble it. And China has given the technology of this fighter to Iran.
@@alihanaydogdu6158why? Because he sees through the Iranian government bullshit…? Literally millions of Iranians do , inside and outside Iran. Do you live under a rock or have you heard about all the protests…?
Found and explained! On another video you posted I asked if you wanted me to make a video about an aircraft, the sr71 blackbird, here is the finished product th-cam.com/video/reVoFnYNOTk/w-d-xo.html
Ghost of Iran is similar to what the Red Baron was about. Finding neat as well Tanks of Iran and Egypt. Their faith is fair game so far, much to admire.
The wingtip pointing down is the same as wingtip pointing up on F-4. And albatross wing has been a concept for a long time. They could have gotten it from boeing, or not, because there's multiple ways to come to that, you can't know untill you ask them.
Let me guess, it's even lightweight because there's no need for brakes either. A trap door opens up below the pilot and they drag their feet to slow the aircraft down.
Hello. I am an Iranian and I am proud that our specialists and engineers are fighting against difficult conditions and trying to build a jet. Can you build a fighter on your own even though you are under sanctions for 50 years? We let it go and look ahead. America once had nothing when Elman defeated them, which they had never seen before. Russia once learned the technology of making fighters from Russia from their father and from China, but to Iran. No one helps
I'd kinda like to agree with you. Like the struggles Iranian engineers went through to get this far is insane.
Self help is the best help. God helps those who help themselves
@@professional_cynic98 self-proclaimed.
It’s so stealthy, in fact, that no one will ever see one in the air.
funny
Noone will see it at air bases either
Iranian military guy on TV "BUT BUT its there, you just cant see it thats how good it is DEATH TO AMERICA!"
just like alasad trump of headace nothing else
Just like they said Iran cant make drones?😚
Tbh as an aircraft designer the intakes on the top with no s ducts is not a huge issue. They will be mainly shielded by ground radar, the more concerning issue would be boundary layer ingestion into the engine. Considering this is an issue that still plagues nations with far bigger budgets I would have to pull the bs card on this design.
another thing i think is angle of attack the engines will bo stalled
The plane must have literally no high alpha qualities other than dropping like a stone. That's speaking as an aero engineer (qualified as one, not working as one!) Overall, it's not a serious project and seems to be designed for its own domestic audience to feel proud about. What else could it be?
Something tells me the intakes look like that because it might not be a supersonic jet. The engines may still be the Iranian Owj turbojet with afterburners but just like the mig17, those afterburners are just there for some extra thrust for better payload capacity for take-off and climb rate. Not really for sustained supersonic flight.
Where can we check out your work? Or should I pull the BS card on you?
Much like the rivet problem of the SU-57.....
After this week's hypersonic demonstration I'd take Iranian claims very seriously.
The hypersonic missiles from russia not iran
@@ihar9862 No they are not. There's no evidence indicating these are Russian models.
@@TraianoLiberatore “there is no evidence “ lmfaooo check the news buddy everyone know that it’s russian missiles
@@TraianoLiberatoreBut they are buyers of Russian weapons.
Yeah, people laugh at them but they shattered your kindergarten Glass dome, David bling 💍, ate your Aero chocolate on their wish ! 😂😂😅
This tiny thingy looks more like a drone where someone decided to put a pilot inside.
It is that. Just a mock-up using the drone they were able to steal.
@@jaanikaapa6925 Naw, they just built it based on a model they found from SketchUp
It looks like a finch
Is the more likely scenario! Trying to build an air industry around a sole crashed U.S drone tech perhaps?
@@jaanikaapa6925 Yup :)
_'we don't need fly-by-wire'_
So, you don't _have_ fly-by-wire?
...
Yup most probably because they can't source one i think
The Russian method:
"It's not a bug, it's a feature! "
"Hey, why would you pull wires instead of using a stick and a hotas like everyone to pilot this thing anyway?"
pretty hard to make one out of cardboard and Fiver 3D models.
What america x36 do😂
You know whats most impressive about this video? That they made a CGI model where a pilot actually fits in the cockpit, unlike the "real" life version of this Iranian jet
...the small size of the cockpit makes me think this thing is actually a suicide bomber, manned by a child soldier...
...a stealthy "Martyr's Bomber" carrying a couple of suitcase nukes...
Just like the drones it used :)
🤣🤣
@@miklosernoehazy8678 Well thank you for that lovely image. I was worried I would sleep soundly tonight......
But yeah I really would not put it passed the Iranian government.
Sure but those Iranian Drones that blew up Himars in Ukraine were CGI too ? 😂
We might laugh at them, but i will give their engineers and mechanics props for keeping the oldies flying till now
Sure I give props to Cuba's mechanics for keeping their cars going but that is mostly a testament to American car quality in the 60's. And I still wouldn't bet that Cuba can make a F1 car.
@@amazingmonkey886 Car and Jet technology have very different developments. A car from today will be in almost every way better than the ones from the 60s. An F35 and an F14, not so much- in fact, there are things that the F14 does much better than the F35 like speed and maneuverability. Even in terms of stealth, the US developed more stealthy jets in the 80s. Rocket, space, and aircraft engineering have not changed much since the 1950s when you compare it to automobile engineering. In 1969 the US landed on the moon, how much has the US space program developed since then?
you can't say that when you vote for Biden 😂
Yes their Aircrafts didn't because human body is incapable of pulling more G force so that's limiting but their effiency to reach further destinations and most importantly the weapon systems surely hella did...by a lot @@hhaaddiizzffaarr
Iran manufacturers there own cars the whole cou try drives there brand
Iran's projects are always ridiculed, but when they are unveiled, the world goes into shock. Just like the hypersonic and intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Here’s the thing: if they go even further into the anhedral design, specifically making the wings hull wings, they’ll get a few advantages. Of those that I can remember off the top of my head: a) the ability to shield underwing external stores from radar and b) by using gull wings in conjunction with all-moving wing tips, one can eliminate the need for the vertical tail and rudders. Furthermore, all-moving wing tips can ease design complexity and reduce maintenance costs by moving all wing surface controls to the wingtips, which also has the added benefit of increased roll performance. In terms of the air intakes, they could theoretically could’ve put radar baffles in the air intakes and we just can’t see them, but this is just me spitballing at this point
Requesting videos on the following:
-switchblade aircraft designs such as the FA-37 Talon from the ‘05 movie “Stealth” or the X-02 Wyvern from the Ace Combat franchise
-Super Tomcat-21 and ASF-14
-the NATF program as a whole
-early ATF proposals
-Sea Apache
-F-20 Tigershark
-Bae SABA
-Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Technology Bomber proposal
It's a very stealthy aircraft, because it will stay on the runway doing taxi tests all day long!
Not even that. It just is there. Made of cardboard.
People are so mean to non superpower countries
@@bobman36 bear in mind, this machine is designed to kill people, too
@@bobman36 just be a superpower, stoopid
As their kamikaze drones?😜
It honestly looks like the Sukhoi Su47 (the plane with backward wings) except they made the wings normal
the SU47 had forward swept wings
only similar thing is the color
I'm Iranian. This thing is just a hoax.
All of the budget is directed toward missiles and drones. Including stealth drones.
And So far is working. I mean HIMARS is like our fateh missile and the drones are just ours!!! So... I can't fault them for not focusing on manned jets
@Toni Dinh I can't wait to see it in the rain
Itu bukani Sukhoi Su47
The advantage of losing a fly-by-wire system is that in the event of an EMP, whether generated from a nuclear detonation or otherwise, means that the pilot could keep flying whereas the control might be knocked out for other pilots depending on the protection of their aircraft!
...still there are at least 200 orher vital systems in that jet that are very susceptible to EMP.
Don't make comments with common sense &impartial logic.. it's not allowed around here
Not keep flying, but able to perform a controlled glide to the ground instead of uncontrolled tumbling out of the sky. Every other computer controlled system in the plane would be knocked out, but at least the stick will still move the control surfaces.
This was my idea as well. Makes total sense.
Today people Jam UAV controls and signals, make drons to land untouched, tomorow maybe planes fly by wire...who knows.
(Compare this with Automatic stick shift and Manual)
1-Anti EMP...(That means when EMP strikes, you can control your plane)
2-Cheaper to make , electronics are more expansive to make.
This was also my guess. Electronic warfare could be an issue for a fly-by-wire system. If it's "old-school" it's immune to that sort of attack.
Exactly! EMP won't work on some of the planes making your tank , car , fully Electronic is kind of bad.. maybe a hybrid.. because EMP will take you out in a heart beat... hell even solar storm can devistate the society if unprepared.! @@Ryan_Winter
If youre jet well equepped to reflect solar storm you will withstand some of emp but that's expansive! and idk if you can actually install it on your plane
It's so stealthy that we haven't even seen it at all (other than the taxiing tests from mock ups)
@JZ's BFF I mean, canvas and plywood was used for the Horten Ho 229 which had a smaller radar cross section than a Spitfire or Mustang. The materials absorb radar waves instead of bouncing them back i think
@JZ's BFF dummy or fake vehicles are still being used for deception as of today. Like Ukrainians are using wooden mock ups of HIMARS launchers and inflatable tanks to deceive the Russians
@JZ's BFF Japan lost terribly
@JZ's BFF you the one sitting up here pretending like Japan was this great deceiver they didn't even realize their codes had been broken just like Iran ain't got nowhere neat a stealth fighter
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
Hmm, when discussing the inlets for the engines, two things come to mind:
First of all, yes, they are rather small, but so are the engines. And unless building am combination of RAM jet and conventional turbo jet/turbo fan with afterburner, small engines don´t require large intakes.
Second, the hightend position of the intakes should be rather effective against ground based radar, since they can hardly be seen from below. Therefore, the designers might have had a higher interest in optimizing the stealth characteristics concerning ground radar compared to airbased radar systems.
Finally, there was the question of why it might be wanted to be wanted to have a plane with the capability of using manual controls instead of a fly-by-wire system.
First of all, this means that there is a high degree of redundancy and savety: A plane, that can be flow manually, will be more likely to survive once the electronics fail, e.g. when being hit by bullets or shrapnel or as a result of an EMP: not every country has EMP hardened electronics at hand.
These two aspects of the design make me wonder, if the aircraft might be a ground attacker and/ or optimized of use in a conflict that includes nuclear weapons.
Again, the FBW system is only 1 of hundreds of systems in the jet. Unless this is just a reskinned pre-coldwar jet, an EMP will kill everything in the jet except the ability to control the glide to the ground. Not exactly helpful. But as you said, when the iranian electronics likely fail, the pilot would be able to still control what is left still functioning on the jet.
your comment is actually very funny. the only way this piece of junk will ever get off the ground is if you push it off a cliff
Ground attack? With two bombs of capacity and no internal guns? Nah. If anything it's an interceptor, but they didn't properly plan for decreasing the signature other aircraft's radar. But I'm leaning hard towards it being fake or nearly completely useless.
I would love to know what happens when you fly at increased angle of attack and the air stalls in the inlets. Be that is what will happen. You will suffocate the engines and stall them, then you stall and pancake into the desert at terminal (for you) velocity.
Ahh, the boundary layer effect. The nemesis of aircraft designers the world over!
Come on Man never mind angle of attack. The thing doesn’t exist and it was made of potty’s And even Potty fell apart after 6 months
The rest of the world: We want our jets to be stealthy and be supermaneuverable so that it can do the Pugachev's Cobra and the falling leaf...
Iran: I want a jet with funny angles
Iran is built different
what if it climbs backwards? Like upside down? Like the space shuttle?
I was just coming into the comments to say that! It'll choke the engines out due to lack of air. So either this aircraft is BS or they plan to NEVER aggressively climb or dogfight. I'm going with the former. It's all nonsense with mockups to look like they're advanced without putting any money or effort into it. It worked for soviet Russia, but it's definitely not gonna work for them.
Manual control is an advantage since it is immune from electronic jamming.
This fighter actually looks perfect for dog fights which is needed for defending a land rather than attacking as does the US.
I remember the time people saying Iranian ballistic missiles were Photoshop.... Now Iran has one of the most diverse and biggest arsenals in the world. Same as the Iranian drone inventory.
Absolutely finally and unbiased comment
And Iraq had the 4th largest military in the world lol
The Iranians have cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs of cheap knock offs.
From the days of F-16, planes become impossible to control by a human anymore, since you need surgically accurate inputs to get things done.
@@AIMI4U f16 is designed to be unstable by choice
Your answer about all manual control: extreme sanction levels cause the high shortage in any kind of hightech gadgets.
Confiança é tudo. se você não acredita, jamais conquistará, Nós acreditamos nos irmãos iranianos!🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
tanks man .respect from iran this american are really arrogance
🇮🇷🇮🇷🙏
🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks,but terrorist sepah whit this shit and so much things like that becomes a shame for our nation 😂
This thing looks like it came out of a Kinder Surprise.
You're a hater
IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
Don’t forget that Iran lost one F-14 in the hands of Tom Cruise 😂😂
Mf just strolled up and was like “Hey who left the keys in here”
And the rest were taken out by cruise missiles!
I like how the Iranian airbase guards are so stupid they didn't think Maverick and Rooster were sus running around the tarmac in obvious American gear.
@@vindictivegrind9370 maybe not-I was thinking about this, and part of their MO is to copy us Americans, so perhaps their flight suits are similar and they color their helmets to look cool.
In American propaganda movies, the enemy is always an idiot and the keys are always in the ignition.
Alhamdulillah. Wonderful News.... May the almighty ALLAH bless Iran, bless the Muslim Umma....
❤❤❤ from Bangladesh.
Iranian gov: Our country needs a new stealth fighter jet!
Engineer right after complition any of Ace Combat games: I've got an idea!
Some Iranian who downloaded some 3D plane models from SketchUp: *_"Hold muh hookah!"_*
Hypothetically speaking, I think the reason why the Iranians probably went for manual controls is that they might be aware/afraid that they lack the sufficient means to counter advanced electronic warfare systems that many modern fighters are equipped with.
Their domestic missiles, drones and loitering munitions obviously have no manual controls as they lack pilots. Seems weird to trust missiles to not suffer from EW and then fear that electronic shielding is insufficient.
I think it's more the recognition that they lack software engineers capable of designing the system. Ew isnt much of a threat to fly by wire.
I wonder if it is to allow them to fly through an EMP?
@@bluesnjax9134 this is a more likely scenario, but it seems like a really outdated way to handle the problem. However it would be an economical way to handle it. My question is, why would that be such a concern for the designers of this plane? Nuclear bombs are the only realistic source of an emp powerful enough to disrupt fly by wire. Is Iran developing a tiny short range stealth strategic bomber? This would match up well with the mechanical controls and air intake location.
@@Typexviiib I dont know shit about EMPS but wouldnt that fry the aircrafts APU and it would lose power supply for ignition of fuel? I would imagine all electronics would be useless making the fighter only good for landing or unguided gun runs and MAYBE un guided bombs or rockets if they also designed them to not need electronic control systems. Radar would fry i think too. IR and radar seeker heads in your missiles would be toast. But I guess if you can get the aircraft home safely it can be repaired and used again.
It’s so stealthy and “homemade” that you won’t even see it in real life! Woah!!!
I’m loving these comments
yeah
they said our drones are Photoshop and toys ten yrs ago
you keep taking we keep building
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 I have always been amazed by Iran's drone development but your questionable profile picture makes it hard for me to believe you are not a government bot. Seriously, are you that petty regarding Israel?
@@josephc.9520 they own the media thats why you think they are not bad
its an old saying that a jew will hit you while crying and screaming like they are being hit
they killed our scientists people snd still are attacking our country none stop they literally support separatists against my country
why should i be a government bot to hate the enemy?!
actually my profile is not even 1% of what i really feel about them
@@ranginkamoonebirang1009 Building 10 thousand dollar drones are different then building stealth aircrafts my guy 😂
The Conqueror F313 is so stealthy, nobody will ever see one flying.
Just as Iranians didn't saw stealth drone RQ170 flying.
OH WAIT?
They did and they stole it from stupid overconfident Yanks, landed it in the middle of their air base and inspected the entire thing screw by screw.
Now they spanking Ukraine so hard on it's arse, that type of red hot glow is sufficient to bake a cake. HAHA!
Just like you said about shaheed drone
@@based_asian.2119 damn
O K, guys. We could call it "conqueror, or P.O.S. Mark VI.
You will see its (as a stealth drone) flying over some EU countries soon. ☺️🇮🇷💌
After reading it, I want to say that this is a bluffing😅 fighter, which is more suitable for drones.
Call it: Iron Dome Breaker.
Probably the only jet that was laughed out of existance.
Its so stealthy, ot has not been seen in almost a decade 😁
I'm certainly laughing at the silly premise of this video...Iran is now gonna go from 50 year old F-14's with no replacement parts to stealth? While under heavy sanctions... right, and I have a bridge to sell too. Silly stuff for idiots is what this channel produces.
LOL! North Korea's military projects are more believable than this Iranian crap.
Listen, if Iran has that jet, it will create the most deadly surprise attack after 9/11 😟
@@michaelwheeler2275 Iran has tiny little plastic boats and a bunch of missiles, that's about it. I'm more afraid of my neighbors dog (he's a Chihuahua) than I am of anything Iran has in its military.
@@michaelfried3123 Iran does have its own locally made frigates and semi heavy submarines. They also made what seems to be a reverse engineered version of the Russian supercavitating torpedo. Something the US Navy doesn't have.
U can underestimate them all u want, but it aint smart to underestimate someone that much.
You mean the thing (not plane) that taxis around with the pilots knees above the canopy rail?
Yeah this dude will do anything to make a video
This wasn't even a jet
That pilot was part of the Iranian Revolutionary Basketball Team
Iran Air force should stick to Drones.
IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
Iran already sort of does have stealth jets, but they're unmanned, few in numbers, and fewer of them are actually armed with nothing more than air to ground weapons.
Not to say they couldn't design a stealth fighter of their own, but it'll take a lot of resources and time to do so, even if they have technical assistance from China and Russia.
you mean the Ali Express flying suicide roombas?
@@supermaster2012 No, like actual surveillance drones like the Shahed 171 Simorgh and Shahed Saegheh. They both come in armed and unarmed configurations and are both probably flying over Ukraine right now in support of Russian troops. Most military drones use a lot of off the shelf equipment to reduce costs, since most military drones are meant to be disposable anyway.
@@dave_riots aka terrorist renamed Ali Express drones.
@@dave_riots You're too smart to be down here.
Looks like something I would draw...when I was 8 years old.
Fly by wire has low survivsbility in an EMP event, for instance.
I'm very impressed with the stealth design of this plane. Because I don't see it leaving the ground.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
The stealth design prevents you from getting a speeding ticket when driving on the highway.
you saw it in the air, didn't you? typical westerner, you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
Because iran had not taken the flying shot
Open your eyes
The manual control thing is easy to explain, it's to be able to use the aircraft even when computer equipment is at risk of being hacked
It would also be cheaper and les complex, yeah?
Absolutely. Just think what would happen to the US airfleet if our computers were hacked/infected or rendered inoperable via EMP.
You could still fly the F4's and some Tomcats (we probably have quite a few that could be made flight capable relatively quickly) I think. Any others in the US fleet that are candidates?
The cocpit they showed off is litterally instruments from a cessna.
Or simply "don't have any".
I agree 100% with it cant be hacked but it can be broke visa vie physical damage. All of this is moot as Iran is not capable of building a gen 5 or 6 stealth fighter plane. They harvested more info on aeronautics from this very comments section than they ever did reverse engineering f-5s, f-14s, and some recent drones they have been able to capture.
The drooped wing tip can be used for “wave riding”, similar to what used on XB-70
Haha yea I doubt they are thinking about using their Mach shockwave to make travel more efficient lol. I would be surprised if that thing could even break the sound barrier.
@JZ's BFF yeah, XB-70 usually don’t drop the tip until passing supersonic. It don’t need be adjusted during wave riding like swing-wings. The reason for not droop the wingtip is for higher aspect ratio and improved low speed performance.
Yeah, this tiny jet with those massive intakes wouldn't break the sound barrier on a good day with a tailwind
@@theussmirage "with a tailwind "?
the hot glue couldn't keep the cardboard together so it bent in the direction of gravity,
As always very well explained thank you.😊
The IAIO Qaher-313 looks so freaking Awesome
FREAKING!
And thats all
Looks ugly ngl
@@xenos7583 They probably stole some kid's 3D plane model from SketchUp
It's a start is what it is. I don't think it will fly but it is something for Iran to gain experience with. They will learn from it and come up with ideas to work within their means. I live in Canada and wish my government would have the balls to start a fighter program and build up an aviation industry from there instead of relying on everyone else.
Wow, the only positive comment about Iran in this entire comment section
Props to you 👍
😂😂😂
My guess is that the 313 is body kit for the F5. Much like how Pontiac Fieros were turned into Ferraris.
I second this,
usa did similar with f117 and it was a (basically )succes
Then they painted it black so they could call it stealth. They may actually think black paint is all it takes!!
@James Iran made a lot of advancements in nanotechnology, so they might have developed an actual stealth coating
@@James-rn7dx so imma half stealth okay
who knows maybe that fighter jet is equipped with an emp weapon that disables their enemy and when that happens, it disorients their enemy long enough to eliminate them
Someone in the design team was obviously playing Ace Combat...
They decided to power it with engines America designed in 1956 for the T-38 trainer,later becoming the F-5 tiger☺️probably the best part of the plane 😄
Hey at least it will probably emit less IR signature. Now concealing it is another story.
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously--thats why u cn;t see the fact of the matter
Despite all its flaws must admit it's a pretty badass design 😎
The design look badass. But has never actually flown.
@@colincampbell767 IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
Lol amazing what you can do with an F5, some cardboard boxes and sticky tape, clearly a world beater…some would say the position of the intakes would cause some compressor stall issues during medium to high AOA manouvering, but clearly the genius behind this design took that into account.
be lucky that they didn't make it goat shaped.
It's amazing what plywood, Elmer's glue, and duct tape can produce!
Usually an analog control is meant to provide necessary cueing and feedback to the pilot.
Looks like the XFA-36 from Ace Combat 3!
Their aircraft's lack of fly-by-wire computer control is not an advantage, no matter what they say. They haven't incorporated it into their jet because they don't have the expertise or (probably) the computer tech necessary to add it. Also, any claim of making the aircraft immune to EMP is ridiculous, because American combat vehicles reliant on computer control and netcentric warfare systems are hardened against EMP effect. If they're concerned about compromised operability due to EMP, it's only because, there too, their technology is lacking.
I can see how hardened the RQ-170 was against EW...they downed it in mint condition.
@@swedhgemoni8092 It's a drone. A pilot inside wouldn't be fooled by spoofing.
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD The systems would be. Especially given how reliant platforms like F-35 and upwards are on datalinks...a repeat of that would sever the connection with wingmen and leave the whole formation vulnerable (F-35 is a worthless aerodynamic turd by itself and I've zero confidence in it's survivability if forced into a standalone engagement).
I think fiber optic cables are more harder to EMP, just slap that on your fighter like the Koreans.
@@yestermonth Nah man, too expensive.
The "I want to believe" of stealth fighters
That's also the Su-57
@@SeSmokki at least SU-57 can fly not like the crap in this video 😂
IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
YUP!! I also made a stealth aircraft which flys at the Hypersonic speed and I keep it in my latrine.
The fact after the end of WT ad it became the most replayed. everyone skipping ads
2:37 Not necessarily full manual flight, If autonomously managed while manually navigated command, in stealth mode, inertia sensors & memorized geo map, can offer a human pilot stealth free-fly. 7:33 a smaller intake wouldn't necessarily supress air, because it offers ramjet sonic flow advantage, unfortunately the speed potential of the engine purpulstion rate is not demonstrated.
it's literally a cardboard mockup, this thing doesn't and will never exist.
@@supermaster2012 lol, cardboard... It's "literally" CGI no dought. Nobody out of 🇮🇷 flight base has seen it. Was it a comp generated of a cardboard plan? *maybe*
@@rolflandale2565 may be soon they will be spotted in Ukraine
@@saeedfarmanali However, most nations wouldn't sell their military arms supply, unless it's already in the outdated model phase. So far, Iran is doing this in prototype rehearsal. Then again, *maybe* they have something much greater than this model.
A mechanical aircraft will help against EMP style attacks.. or they simply do not have the tech to have a fully electronically controlled plan
Caution they have a new flying carpet
You realize that EMP defenses became standard in all military hardware during the 1950's - right?
Also computers and their cases are heavy. Small aircraft can get away with manual control.
if iran can control missiles then they can control a plane
Interesting, as an aeronautical engineer I am not entirely convinced by the overall design. There are some aspects to this concept in that it at least gives countries venturing into this area of aerial defence a platform from which to build on. Right now, I think they are a good few years away from service.
As an aeronautical engineer, what is your hot take on this thing being a bunch of cardboat ductapped to an F5? Because that's what it is...
@@supermaster2012You have already given an opinion, what do you want now? An approval? don't dump your pent-up childhood trauma of rejection on us. We have shit to do.
Cartoons and mock ups can't hang with a piper cub
This IS...only the beginning...more sophisticated military weapons are yet to come....😊😊😊
For high altitude nuke EMP, it would be the most advanced operational fighter jet in the air in such a case.
Actually just about every US military aircraft will still be flying. And even a lot of consumer electronics and just about every car will also. You'd be surprised about just how much stuff has to be protected from electromagnetic interference.
Except every other electrical system, like the fuel pumps etc woukd still go down, guess itll be a pretty cool glider though 😅
I laughed so hard my belly started to laugh too 😂😂😂.
IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
Now what? Iron doomed?
Love your work !!!, hopefully one day the Indian aircrafts get the stage too 😁!
India can actually build real planes not toys like these guys make
@@vinrico6704 yet can't build a functioning toilet.
@@supermaster2012 everyone has strengths and weakness...
Less electronics=less complication.
Every time I saw the segment of the jet taxiing, the voice in the back of my head yelled "RC model!"
About the only advantage i could think of not having fly by wire is that it becomes moderately less susceptible to EMPs (which currently can only be generated by high altitude nukes, so… i think you’d have other issues)
you're forgetting the obvious advantage, that you can't make a fly by wire system out of cardboard.
It's due to sanctioned computer chips. It's really not that hard to understand.
Could it be that the current version is just a new skin on an existing F-5 to make it a bit more lik F-14 but with some stealth? Yes, I know it's single tail vs twin tail, but it seems to make sense given what they have to work with, much like Taiwan's IDF looked like a weird mish-mash of F-5, F-16, and F/A-18 (with a dash of some Mirage jets in there) It's clear they don't have the avionics to make a true 5th gen stealth fighter, but can this this be even called 4.5gen? It's likely without radar as well, so it'd be CHEAP compared to a true 5th gen , much like F-5 vs F-14.
it's a coardboard mockup made from a 3D model they got from Fiver.
From personal experience manual flying is actually slightly better than computerised flying this is because the flying is more down to pilot skill and not AI. But for faster response in a battle situation computerised flying could or could not be delayed when a pilot inputs a manoeuvre this is because the competent has to translate it then input the move but with manual it’s done instantly
That's literally not a thing, most modern fighters are impossible to fly without fly by wire.
Touch grass
I think the Iranian swap the idea from the mig-31 in fire fox movie 🤣
i love the design and it is simple and functional
An aerodynamically stable design does make sense, if you are lacking the capacities to develop fly-by-wire software, the avionics suite etc.
In that case, anyone would try to close the gap, best possible, leaving headaches to the next generation, more time to catch up, included.
it's kinda hard to made avionics suites out of cardboard.
That is not, what I meant.
@@MonsieurPhilippe1 okay, here have a baguette and a white flag.
Capitulation accepted.
2:50 Id argue direct control is always best. Obviously as a last resort back up which is why those features are here in this. Its a bit much but in the modern day of electronic warfare they might have worries about having their fighter's control paths blocked possibly by some electro jamming device. Hey I'm using my brain here. Think about it tho. Thats how drones have been taken out in the past. They jam the flight control or flat out take it over from drones. Why not use the same tech to swat fighters out of the sky.
Im referring to drones being taken over. Not actual fighters but why not.
Because jet fighters are not piloted remotely.
Drones are hacked typically by spoofing GPS and telling the drone that it is landing in friendly territory. A pilot inside the aircraft that controls the aircraft will not land simply because the control logic tells him to.
Iran and stealth fighter..lol..100 years away
Can u build a toilet street 💩💩😂😂
I'm so glad u mentioned that drone...gift from #44..just gave it to them
This terrifying plain is amazingly fit for CGI wars
I'm no expert but here goes. FBW and other systems may be beyond their design capability and daily serviceability. What real good is a hangar queen when you need a sortie now. Using parts/engines/weapons that you trust and are available might make sense for a country that changes allies and enemies occasionally. The desire to have a new wave F5/MIG21 I can understand but can they pull it off? That remains to be seen.
This jet looks like it was designed by sci fi artists who have no idea how planes actually work
so stealthy, that not even its pilotes have seen it yet.❤
Manual controls are immune to emp.
Love this guy video great job mate keep it up 👍👌
Keep thinking like this….. it is good for Iran….. they will improve day by day
Yes I have stealthy $1 million in my bank account from Stealthy Iran.
Long live Iran .the only 1 unique country which faced heavy western sanctions for almost 50 years and still is building new military technology and rising gradually! Iran 🇮🇷🇮🇷
That plane is tiny and isnt even that stealthy, not to mention that the engines are reverse enginnered (stolen) from the J85 turbojet, WHICH WAS MADE IN THE 1950s
i wanna know what type of drug you on .cuz i need it 🤣
@@snipohyper285 common logic
Wow, this Qaher is not only stealthy but also invisible to human eyes and all kinds of radar, infrared, x-ray, gama, etc. The one we see in this video is the only one they make visible.
The reason for broken wings is use of ground effect , its makes the fighter be able to fly stably fly at very low altitude
No fly by wire serves two main purposes: 1. They're sanctioned which makes it hard for them to get components 2. If facing an adversary that has greater technological means analog controls are the safer bet over digital controls systems. ///they probbly dont want to see the flying version of Stux-net.
Funny note, just after you made the comment about the manual control surfaces there was an animated shot of the plane taking off.
In this shot a naca duct is clearly visible, these are theoretically low drag intake ducts(haven't seen a lot of experimentation).
But why this is funny, particularly with manual controls is that these ducts don't work trans or supersonic. Which would limit the craft to about 600mph if that duct does anything important.
you only see what u want to see, quite obviously
@@randyeduo brother what?
Iran has passed its test in ballistic missiles, drones, tanks, be sure that it will perform in the best way in fighter jets as well.
Iran's F313 is very similar to China's FC31, I believe it is a Chinese fighter and Iran wants to assemble it. And China has given the technology of this fighter to Iran.
As a iranian I have to say Bro that fighter jet was a lie😂
Our government always talks about building fantastic military stuff but 90% of them was lie
Telling me without tell YOUR jew From Iran 😂😂😂
You are the only intelligent iranian 😂
When they take rq170 you say same think but even dont know whwere is it for 6 months until iran self telling your😂s@alihanaydogdu6158
@@alihanaydogdu6158why? Because he sees through the Iranian government bullshit…? Literally millions of Iranians do , inside and outside Iran. Do you live under a rock or have you heard about all the protests…?
Xavier is indian
Found and explained! On another video you posted I asked if you wanted me to make a video about an aircraft, the sr71 blackbird, here is the finished product th-cam.com/video/reVoFnYNOTk/w-d-xo.html
Its so stealthy that even Iranian pilots dont see it...😂😂😂
IRAN (2024): hi US, how are you?
Ah yes, an aircraft that doesn’t actually exist or ever had a chance of existing
Will it still function if I take the hijab off?
lol
based
Not gonna lie, this is a very genuine sponsor.
We try.
I think manual would be an advantage because its not gonna get hacked
Ghost of Iran is similar to what the Red Baron was about. Finding neat as well Tanks of Iran and Egypt. Their faith is fair game so far, much to admire.
If you don't have fly by wire, your adversary cannot take it over electonically.
The wingtip pointing down is the same as wingtip pointing up on F-4. And albatross wing has been a concept for a long time. They could have gotten it from boeing, or not, because there's multiple ways to come to that, you can't know untill you ask them.
That bump under cabine belong to the nightingale ,while the pilot sitting in the jet the birds will singing for he
Are y friggin' kiddin' me ?
Oh it's fun getting things sketched on to paper 😆😆😆
Well done you Iran 😁
Let me guess, it's even lightweight because there's no need for brakes either. A trap door opens up below the pilot and they drag their feet to slow the aircraft down.