Be My WINGMAN In War Thunder for FREE on PC, PS®5 and Xbox Series X|S: playwt.link/foundandexplained Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now. See you in battle!
yea yea yea come fly with me in 2 to 3 bussniss years the grind to top tear is teribly long buy the time a new player got to top tear you would have stoped playing the game
Would have loved to have heard just a bit more about the fascinating cooperation between their engineers and Lockheed. Great stuff as always, and Tanks, bruddah!
The snail has been leeching off me for so long that I dont even know what reality it. All I dream about now is research points and purchasing golden eagles.
A small wholesome fact about the person, Yakovlev. He was a best friend to Sydney Camm, the man behind the Harrier program. Sydney met Yakovlev at Farnborough Air Show and he even allowed Yakovlev to enter the Harrier's cockpit. Yakovlev determined & promised to him to make a plane that could equal Camm's Harrier. But sadly 1 day before the Yak-38 & Yak-141 unveiled, his friend, Sydney, passed away. Yak-141 & Yak-38 is actually a love letter to Camm & Hawker Siddeley's Harrier.
@@TK57477 well. Actually there are witnesses around the airshow that witnessed the communications between them. Yak-38 was the first plane to be made before the upgraded Yak-141 as the clarification.
This is true, the 3BSN type used on the F35 was patented in the US in 1967, its lift system was mainly based on the convair M200 design. The F35s lift system was patented in early 1990, the visits to the yak didnt occur until the late 90/early91. So no, the Yak141 is not the F35s father
@@robflyrc Lockheed officials went to visit russia on two occasions, both of which occurred after the majority of the F35s design was finalized. to say that the 141 had any significant influence on the F35 design would be a falsehood.
@@medic6039 maybe i have wrong calendar but Yak-141 had maiden on '87 and JAST/JSF program started on '93, and you are saying that they've got design of F35 FINALIZED before? First I hear to be honest.
Yak-141 was the first one of a new Soviet aircraft generation, which never came to production due to USSR dissolution. Su-27M, MiG 1.42, MiG LFI, MiG 70, Su-47, Su-37 (fighter-bomber), you name it. It always feels bad when you recall it.
Yak-41, a personal pain for any aviation lover in Russia. He was the pinnacle of the development of Yakovlev aircraft, and embodied many of the best practices of Soviet aviation in general. At the same time, this aircraft had a huge potential not only on Aircraft Carriers, but also on land, because it does not need a long GDP. Alas, his flight was permanently interrupted at the very beginning. You can see the original prototype at the Aviation Museum in Monino, not far from Moscow.
In an alternate timeline, we could have seen the Yakovlev Yak-141 and Hawker Siddeley P.1154 supersonic V/STOL or STOVL fighters flying against each other.
Also the VJ101E which used the same engine and nozzle. The destructive capability and precision of modern cruise missiles suggests to me that VTOL will again become essential for some countries.
@@rizz1042 yea Russias been trying to continue its legacy but doesn’t have the budget it once had, but has still made new aircraft that are just as amazing like the KA-52
Also missed mentioning the unique nozzles on the tail. The yak, NATO reporting name 'Freestyle', had yaw valves to aid the control of the aircraft while hovering. NATO reporting name 'Freestyle'
Вот бы возобновить производство этих самолетов , да и на каждый из строящихся в Керчи УДК проекта 23900 авиагруппу в 16-20 таких самолетов, в дополнение к вертолетам!
In all honesty I question the Yak 141 influence on the F35. Lockheed purchasing the aircraft mostly to take a glimpse on VTOL devlopment of thier adversary more than to study since the X-35 prototype already done it's first VTOL flight before Lockheed Martin studied the Yak.
@@MrJakeMallard he's not wrong, the design is inspired by the Convair Model 200, not the 141. The 141 was used to help with not having to worry about teething problems
In 1991, Lockheed entered a deal with Yakolev to develop prootypes of the Yak 141. In 1995, Lockheed began developing the F35. It's no surprise that both jets look alike.
I know what was happening in my country in 1991: "evil soviets went aways and good capitalist sold everything including this plane". The idea itself that you can have a foreign corporation affiliated with same foreign military to "help you develope prototypes" is beyond redicilous.
"In 1995, Lockheed began developing the F35. It's no surprise that both jets look alike."(sic) The Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert JSF patent is dated May 1990.
It's genuinely funny that people are trying to argue that LM didn't use Yakovlev tech in the F-35, considering this fact has been known for 25+ years, mainly due to the fact that LM used to openly brag about it in interviews and constantly tell people how much better it was than the British style used in the Harrier or the X-32. Of course they went quiet on the subject after Putin came along and the US/Russia became less buddy, but it's not like the articles/etc aren't still easily locatable via Google searches.
@@prodigy-hu6dy Wrong. Like I said, back in the 90s LM used to openly brag about how their partnership with Lockheed on the X-35 propulsion was way better than MD's partnership with BAE or what Boeing had going on in the X-32. I.E In 2002 Lockheed Martin JSF leader Tom Burbage said in an interview with Air Force magazine that their biggest gamble was the lift system in the STOVL version of the X-35 which used a swivel-down rear exhaust licensed from the Yakovlev design bureau in Russia (which tried it out on the Yak-141 STOVL fighter). On an interesting note, in 1995 Lockheed Martin's president of aeronautics Mickey Blackwell said that the company only partnered with Yakovlev on the lift system because British Aerospace had already partnered with McDonnel Douglas for the JSF program. Which means that if UK competition laws had allowed BAE to work with both LM and MD then the Boeing X-32 would have won the JSF competition.
The rotating duct nozzle had already been demonstrated in a Rolls Royce MTU engine for the German VJ 101E. There is even one in a museum display. Rolls-Royce/MAN Turbo RB.153. You can find images but it has to be for the "E" version VJ 101E
@@williamzk9083 really? You mean you are unaware that the VJ101 was using a Bristol Pegasus AFTER the Harrier was in service? Also that it was a dead end because it supplemented the Pegasus with additional lift engines.
@@uingaeoc3905 You are wrong. No version of the supersonic VJ101 A/B/C/D/E was to use a Pegasus or anything related. You are thinking of the VAK 191 which was a different aircraft. It used a scaled down Pegasus combined with vertical lift engines to try to achieved better fuel consumption and range.
Reminds me of some info that Elon Musk & SpaceX get their rocket designs from ex Soviet designs. While no hard proof such thing happened, its difficult to deny that at least SpaceX rocket designs were inspired by those ex Soviet designs. Also Musk travelled to Russia couple of times before SpaceX become a real rocket launch & recovery company. The US government & aerospace company also actually know that there are a lot of great ideas & designs from Soviet engineers/scientist, but they just try to down play it as good as possible.
Other than surface level things like "this rocket has a lot of engines like that one soviet rocket", there's no shot spacex designs rockets based off of soviet designs. Starship and the n27(?) both have a lot of engines, but that's the only thing you can say about the two.
@@dgdave2673 I know you never said he was, but just want to clarify for all that Musk is not an engineer. Dude’s just an investor. He doesn’t know what he’s looking at when he sees advanced design information and blueprints.
Yak 41 hit the deck because the main engine sucked in exhaust fumes. That's why the Yak 141's auxiliary engines are positioned at an angle of 85° (the Yak 41 has 90°) to blow the products towards the rear of the aircraft.
This marvelous soviet engineering technology of the late 70s was stolen from the Soviet Union after its collapse and used in US F-35 design for an aircraft with vertical takeoff. At the same period of time, the Chinese stole the complete design of Mig-1.14 and created an exact copy of their own J-14 fighter jet. That's how the story goes.
It is not the forefather of the F-35. They are actually very different. The Forefather of the F-35 is the Convair 200. Even the lift fan design of the F-35 goes back to American patents for 3 bearing swivel designs from the1960's. The Yak had three engines and the US F-35 has one. That should be your first clue.
@@wadopotato33 Of course they are different, there is mor than a decade between them. You're talking about 'patents', but Soviets put that in reality. After breakup of Soviet Union (under Yeltsin) Loockheed Martin took a share of Yakovlev Design Buro with 'intent' to help develop YAK-141 VTOL fighter, which was the first, somewhat operational plane to use swivelling nozzle design.. LM used that technology in developement of F-35.
@@fifi23o5 Incorrect. Pratt & Whitney patented and built the first swivel bearing nozzle in the 1960s not the thieves masquerading as engineers at Yakovlev. The patent that Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert filed for the JSF in May of 1990 is available to read online. Suggest you get yourself edified rather than continue parroting myths and urban legends, Fifi.
That is the dumbest thing I have heard in a long time. They, other than being superficially a similar size are not really alike. Firstly, the F-35 is stealthy and is run by a supercomputer. The Yak is about as stealthy as a brick and not much smarter. Even the lift fan or how they hover are different. Not many who know would call these planes similar, let alone call a Russia Yak a Russian F-35. Not at all similar.
@@georgedvorak9481 They aren't the same. The lift fan design was patented in 1960's and the F-35 shares more with the Convair 200 and other planes than it does with a Yakolev. Even the lift fans and how they work are very different. What you are saying is often said, but that doesn't make it any truer. It is a dumb idea.
It is theorized that the reason why the Soviet Navy wasn't given so much priority in its early days was because of Stalin's distrust of the Navy following the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921.
Bullshit... Under Stalin the Navy was introducing new ships and modernizing old ones. By 1937 the linear cruisers "Gangut", "Petropavlovsk" and "Sevastopol" were radically modernized. New light cruisers "Kirov", "Voroshilov", "Molotov" and "Maxim Gorky" were built, and also "Krasniy Kavkaz", "Chervona Ukraina" and "Profintern" were modernized. In 1939 the Navy included the fundamentally new high-speed multipurpose leaders of the destroyers "Moscow", "Leningrad", "Tashkent", "Kharkov", "Minsk", "Tbilisi" and "Baku". Don't make a maniac out of Stalin... Just read the statistics of the development of the USSR during his rule, when the annual economic growth of the country was 13.8%. No one else in the world had or will have such a growth...
Not quite Real inspiration would be Convair Model 200, the design of VTOL navy jet from 1970s completed with design of 3-section nozzle (so the nozzle design isn't new when Yak-141 came around). US navy want VTOL jet for quite a long time. Yes, LM and Yak had made a deal to furthur F-35 development but by the time the deal came through X-35B VTOL already ready for testing, as we knew the design of new aircraft takes years to desgin so LM did their design long before Yak deal. So other than data to help refined final design of F-35, the fundamental is difference. Nozzle design came from Conviar Model 200, the superior new lift-fan design replaced other lift jet and so on.
@@DOSFS This, the soviets stole American R&D ideas (stealing other people's stuff is basically all they ever did) but simply did not have the technological sophistication to figure out how to make it work "well enough".
@@LordEmperorHyperion Ok? What the point about the bank have to do with VTOL development? Sorry bros, I didn't take Anti US propangada just to be edgy. Other than similar nozzle design (which again already have idea and some early design work on in US defense sector since 1970s), both design literally have nothing in common. Did Yak-141 have lift-fan or data-links?
Just a clarification on the F35B thrust vectoring system: it actually was from an earlier patent from 1967 from pratt and whitney. The main contribution from the Yakolev was the test data on the engine.
@@kgb1632 By "given" you mean sold. The thrust vectoring system is actually quite different. The F-35 design is really more like the Convair 200 and the US already had patents dealing with 3 bearing swivel nozzles long before they worked with Yakolev. They also built the Harrier under licence. The fact that Yakolev used three engines (two of which were dead weight in flight) and the F-35 uses one engine and a lift fan, should tell you that they are not that similar and that the F-35 is far from being a copy. They are really quite different.
@@wadopotato33 Except that they had both patents for single engine and the triple engine configuration just like in the Yak plane. Regardless they did obtain it and did use it in their development of the F35. It obviously wasn't a full copy. But it does have some research and development of the Yak plane in it.
if you kinda squint and turn your head it actually does bear a resemblance to the F35. one of the coolest aircraft i only recently learned about. cool video
The design was legally adopted for f35..... Technology transfer was done by Yakelov in exchange of good amount. Yekelov was in bad phase by then. So the resemblance is not just coincidence..
This is the most beautiful fighter jet that i ever seen. Bulky yet slick design, aggressive too, i love the use of angles and the Vtol Platform adds a lot of charm to the overhaul design. Shame it ended so quickly
Мне больше всех нравится Миг 31. В рекламе немецкого шоколада Ritter Sport есть слоган Quadratisch, Praktisch, Gut. Вот это можно применить и к Миг 31. Он грозен и красив. У него нет ничего лишнего.
Not even kidding I was joking with my friend yesterday about getting a VTOL jet because you could "take" it anywhere and we joked about getting one of these
F-35 Lightning II - build over the concept of the Yak 141. So much that if the Yak hadn't been built - the F-35 wouldn't have existed in the form it has.
They had very few of the Yak-38 and they repainted the numbers on them from time to time in an attempt to give the impression that it was more of them than it actually was.
At one point I was not sure what aircraft you were talking about. Yukolev? What's so hard to pronounce Yak-ov--lev? For a commoner it's not a big deal, but when your job is to TALK about things, than do the job properly. Good content, other ways. As usually.
Well there is a misunderstanding here. Yak 41 and Yak 141 are two different planes with 2 different engines. Initially only Yak 41 has been built. Unfortunately it was full success with vertical landing and flying. The problem was that the engine was to week to carry any load except the plane it self. And it was slow - it wasn't supersonic. Then Yak 141 has been born with it's supersonic engine. It also has completely different fuselage.
"so the tech used by American lockheed martin on F35's vertical landing was a Russian tech."(sic) A myth perpetuated by the ignorant and the thieves masquerading as engineers at Yakovlev.
A little trivia' The designer of the F35 and Lockheed won lots of awards for this design claim it to be original. But in reality, it was developed in Communist Russia to start and then the Russian Republic. So In reality Lockheed most likely discouraged Yak from further development as to not have any competition.
Россия продала эту технологию Англии. Наши инжинеры посчитали такую конструкцию преждевременной. И во многом оказались правы. Кроме вертикального взлёта и посадки этот самолёт проигрывал буквально во всём истребителю классической схемы. Есть версия что это было сделано намеренно, что бы пустить запад по ложному пути.
About the rotating duct system: it wasn't directly derived from Yakovlev's design, but rather Lockheed (after taking a look at yak-141 ducting system) dusted off the blueprints from Convair model 200's movable exhaust duct
Cooperation with Lockheed Following the announcement by the CIS in September 1991 that it could no longer fund development of the Yak-41M, Yakovlev entered into discussions with several foreign partners who could help fund the program. Lockheed Corporation, which was in the process of developing the X-35 for the US Joint Strike Fighter program, stepped forward, and with their assistance aircraft 48-2 was displayed at the Farnborough Airshow in September 1992. Yakovlev announced that they had reached an agreement with Lockheed for funds of $385 to $400 million for three new prototypes and an additional static test aircraft to test improvements in design and avionics. Planned modifications for the proposed Yak-41M included an increase in STOL weight to 21,500 kg (47,400 lb). One of the prototypes would have been a dual-control trainer. Though no longer flyable, both 48-2 and 48-3 were exhibited at the 1993 Moscow airshow. The partnership began in late 1991, though it was not publicly revealed by Yakovlev until 6 September 1992, and was not revealed by Lockheed until June 1994.[9]
Paraphrasing wackypedia puts your credibility in the commode. The date of the filing for the Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert JSF patent was May 1990 and Yak never did deliver the four additional aircraft that they accepted the money for, did they?
The USSR Navy included five heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers (TAVKR) - Kyiv, Minsk, Novorossiysk, Baku and Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov. Two more ships (nuclear engine) - "Varyag" and "Ulyanovsk" - were under construction.
I don’t get why one hard landing was considered its death (apart from the financial issues). Are you telling me an F-35 has never made a hard landing while under development?
War Thunder is heavy on the pockets... also it's better played on PC for aerial combat, I can't control any plane with the joystick in RB!! Tried to calibrate the complex control option without success, the planes are uncontrollable.
UK Harrier first flight was in 1967 and the concept for a VTOL aircraft is probably as old as helicopters themselves edit: harrier 2 first flight was 1985, harrier 1 was a lot earlier in 1967
Not an aeronautics expert here but I really wish the Soviets would've made the wings a bit bigger on these old cold war designs of theirs. It seemed to me that back then they were obsessed with top speed so all their fighters from this era look like they would have very limited maneuverability. Compare these designs to modern day Russian fighters which are almost all wing with a couple of engines a cockpit attached.
The MiG series had great maneuverability (even the Sukhoi counterparts). Except for the 25s and 31s I think, but they had large wings. Ur getting confused the meaning of maneuverability. Longer wings means greater lift but the bigger the wing means more drag and it would slow down the aircraft *immensely* while turning. A larger wing can create a tighter turn; however, a tighter turn at a given speed creates more g-forces and therefore requires a structurally heavier wing. A shorter wing can have excellent roll rate. So a wing of that size is better than a long ungainly wing. I hope this helped.
I’ve got to say the Boeing X-32 has got to be the most goofy looking jet fighter in history. Just as well they went with the Lockheed X-35 design even if it was for the looks alone.
There was no funding for the Yak-141 program from Lockheed. I talked with one of the Yak-38 developers. For bribes, the Yak-141 technologists were handed over to Lockheed.
There was. And it is a matter of public record. I talked with one of the Yak developers...I know which source I would trust. Get your third party heresay outta here.
@@AA-xo9uw Is it possible to get acquainted with the secret sections too? One gets the feeling that you have the education and brains of a five-year-old child.
engine on this aircraft is SO powerful. they had to redesign structural stiffening, first testing tore engine right through top of the plane at full throttle when hovering
I saw an interview with the designers of the YAK company. They said that they had sold to the Americans, among other things, the development of an aircraft with one engine for flight and for vertical ascent into the air. And the Americans used this option.
What the hell is afterburner in VTOL mode?! The Yak-41 takes off vertically with a full combat load. Or maybe from a shortened run-up. And its afterburner, in this mode, works like the f-35, which cannot take off vertically, but only from a run-up.
being all Russian aviation industry companies are now one company, they should have yak (and mig) subdivisions as well as some of the other companies lost to time for projects they were known to do in their past!
That is false. They aren't the same. The US F-35 has one engine. The Yak had three. The US held patents on 3 bearing swivel designs going back to the 1960's. The real forefather of the F-35 is the Convair 200, not the Yakolev. Sorry, you are wrong.
@@wadopotato33I don’t know what part of “base” do you not understand. No one had made the idea of a after burning VTOL capable possible. The United States bought a prototype of one of the remaining Yak-41 left. 2 decades later revealing the F-35. I don’t know where the idea of not being the exact same dictates that it wasn’t based and token inspiration from. Take for example the J-20. Explain why everyone calls it a copy.
@@wadopotato33 the Convair 200 was never as capable as the Yak-141. It a proposed design. It never join service. Also the Convair 200 uses 3 engines. So I don’t know how you got that idea
So now you think Lockheed Martin copied its design for F-35 right. But noo, it isn't that 3BSN & VTovl system was patented by Lockheed & Pratt&W in late 60's
The rotating duct nozzle had already been demonstrated in a Rolls Royce MTU engine for the German VJ 101D. There is even one in a museum display. Rolls-Royce/MAN Turbo RB.153. You can find images but it has to be for the "E" version VJ 101E. It was also on the twin engine VJ 101E. I believe an American Convair 200 design also used it. It was not a Russian invention. Lockheed-Martin used Yakolov as a consultancy to take advantage of their experience thereby making sure there were no surprises.
The all vectored thrust Pegasus concept still trikes me as the best solution. The Yak 141 and f35 both have the same problem - complexity and dead weight of the lift engines/fan. The Harrier has had 60 years of operational experience with the supposed issue of hot gas reingestion not limiting the aircraft in any way operationally. Lockheed with their huge marketing department have tried to make it a fact but nearly 30 years after first flight of the x35 the basic problem with the f35b remains and it has not achieved anything like the operational success and flexibility of the Harrier and probably never will. The Yak-141 separate lift engine/fan is the wrong solution for a high performance combat jet. The Boeing x36 used the vectored thrust concept but blew it because they insisted on the weird nose intake and monolithic wing design. British Aerospace who were working with Boeing had a concept supersonic VSTOL concept in the early 1990s that used two conventional side intakes and a more conventional wing/stabiliser layout together with the triposter vectored trust engine the x36 had - and it was a great looking aircraft and in my view would have beaten the x35 hands down if the British had been listened to. It is almost as if Boeing never really wanted to win the x35/x36 competition in hindsight. One day perhaps someone will do the obvious and have another go at a supersonic vectored thrust (i.e. Pegasus like engine) combat jet and this time continue on from where the Harrier successfully left off. A case of the wrong people having the right idea. The British actually developed the Pegasus from a French concept apparently - so if the British can swallow their pride why can't the Yanks. If the Pegasus had been a US lead project the stealth VSTOL fighter of today would beyond doubt be vectored thrust not separate lift fan based.
"The all vectored thrust Pegasus concept still trikes me as the best solution."(sic) A common belief of those who have never personally had to deal with the effects of the hot gas ingesting compressor stalls that the Pegasus is notorious for. By the way, the Yak didn't utilize a lift fan but you have a duly noted aversion to facts.
Actually US brought the Yak-141 to US after the dissolution of USSR and later stole the tech including the design which now they implemented it in F-35. This fact is very hard to accept for Western fanboys.
If you want the Yak-141 in war thunder (and I have it) it will take about 2 or more years of playing daily. you can also buy a $70usd premium jet and grind the tech tree out in a month or so if your good.
Be My WINGMAN In War Thunder for FREE on PC, PS®5 and Xbox Series X|S: playwt.link/foundandexplained
Follow the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now. See you in battle!
Warthunder sucks im not gonna get 3000h from my life Just to fly the f-14...
Plese stop promoting it its not fun.
Yesh, the War Blunder experience:
th-cam.com/video/-f99GcRVJ8s/w-d-xo.html
i knew this video is because the snail(gaijin)
yea yea yea come fly with me in 2 to 3 bussniss years the grind to top tear is teribly long buy the time a new player got to top tear you would have stoped playing the game
Would have loved to have heard just a bit more about the fascinating cooperation between their engineers and Lockheed. Great stuff as always, and Tanks, bruddah!
If you start grinding now from 0 to get the Yak-141 you will need to play for 3 years daily for 8 hours and sell your soul to the snail
Or spend thousands of $$ there’s always that option
The snail has been leeching off me for so long that I dont even know what reality it. All I dream about now is research points and purchasing golden eagles.
How much does it actually cost to skip ahead in war thunder
20 to 30 dolars to buy a top tear preamium but you will get hunted by other players because your in a primium
@@offroad2445 players can tell if another player bought their plane? That's sorta BS. Encourages you to just be a grinding bug
A small wholesome fact about the person, Yakovlev. He was a best friend to Sydney Camm, the man behind the Harrier program. Sydney met Yakovlev at Farnborough Air Show and he even allowed Yakovlev to enter the Harrier's cockpit. Yakovlev determined & promised to him to make a plane that could equal Camm's Harrier. But sadly 1 day before the Yak-38 & Yak-141 unveiled, his friend, Sydney, passed away. Yak-141 & Yak-38 is actually a love letter to Camm & Hawker Siddeley's Harrier.
unexpected, but nice aviation-yaoi fanfick ^^
@@TK57477 well. Actually there are witnesses around the airshow that witnessed the communications between them. Yak-38 was the first plane to be made before the upgraded Yak-141 as the clarification.
@@TK57477 and no. It's not a fanfic. Just a normal friendship between two man in history of modern aviation.
@@Stellaris556 It was fine until you said "its a love letter".
@@ItsDatGuy969 when people misinterpret "love letter" to the other way. People could misunderstood. It's more of a token of friendship.
Yak-141: I am your Father
F-35: NOOOOO!!!
This is true, the 3BSN type used on the F35 was patented in the US in 1967, its lift system was mainly based on the convair M200 design.
The F35s lift system was patented in early 1990, the visits to the yak didnt occur until the late 90/early91.
So no, the Yak141 is not the F35s father
@@medic6039 yes and no let's say. Lockheed participated in costs of Yak-141 program and officially bought gathered data after maiden of the prototype.
@@medic6039 mor on
@@robflyrc Lockheed officials went to visit russia on two occasions, both of which occurred after the majority of the F35s design was finalized. to say that the 141 had any significant influence on the F35 design would be a falsehood.
@@medic6039 maybe i have wrong calendar but Yak-141 had maiden on '87 and JAST/JSF program started on '93, and you are saying that they've got design of F35 FINALIZED before? First I hear to be honest.
Yak-141 was the first one of a new Soviet aircraft generation, which never came to production due to USSR dissolution. Su-27M, MiG 1.42, MiG LFI, MiG 70, Su-47, Su-37 (fighter-bomber), you name it. It always feels bad when you recall it.
Makes me really sad
Mig-70?
I don't like that it never went into production but is in tons of my air RB matches.
Sekret documents BS. Annoying tbh. Cool plane though.
@@idontknowwhatnameuse Mig MDP 701
@@semiedgv thanks
this is one of the coolest jet ever.
Harrier.
@@luvelyjubely they're both completely different VTOL designs lmao
@@luvelyjubelybut it very ugly
@@ICEMAN-qg9nk It isn’t lmfao 💀💀💀
@@Mozzii_ Ik, still VTOL.
Yak-41, a personal pain for any aviation lover in Russia.
He was the pinnacle of the development of Yakovlev aircraft, and embodied many of the best practices of Soviet aviation in general.
At the same time, this aircraft had a huge potential not only on Aircraft Carriers, but also on land, because it does not need a long GDP.
Alas, his flight was permanently interrupted at the very beginning.
You can see the original prototype at the Aviation Museum in Monino, not far from Moscow.
A pain indeed, like Avro Arrow for Brits.
@@TK57477 * Canadians
@@TK57477 TSR2
@@Animator-J-u6d yes. my bad
@@TK57477 yes😢
In an alternate timeline, we could have seen the Yakovlev Yak-141 and Hawker Siddeley P.1154 supersonic V/STOL or STOVL fighters flying against each other.
Also the VJ101E which used the same engine and nozzle. The destructive capability and precision of modern cruise missiles suggests to me that VTOL will again become essential for some countries.
Lockheed: *Autistic screeching*
The Yak was a dead end.
Which yak? The -38 or the - 41/141?
@@jehoiakimelidoronila5450 both sadly.
Love the plane those boxy intakes make it look like a baby mig-31, so cute.
Much like the F-35 is a baby F-22
I knew this was gonna be sponsored by War Thunder
Maybe
"Coincidences don't exist"
Hahajaha
Predictable.
Rule of snail
Imagine all of the crazy aircraft the USSR could have kept creating if it didn’t fall apart.
It was an evil system that needed to die. Thank God it did.
Ekranoplan also!
agree, ussr had some of the best engineers in the world, can see some of their weapons still beating nato in the ukraine war
@@rizz1042 yea Russias been trying to continue its legacy but doesn’t have the budget it once had, but has still made new aircraft that are just as amazing like the KA-52
@@xxmobstrxx8535 generally ka50 was made in late ussr, ka52 is just ka50 with 2 seats
Also missed mentioning the unique nozzles on the tail. The yak, NATO reporting name 'Freestyle', had yaw valves to aid the control of the aircraft while hovering. NATO reporting name 'Freestyle'
He missed it because they were not unique at all. The concept was invented by Rolls in their Medway engine.
Why does he call Yakovlev - Yukolev?! Its YA-KOV-LEV, not YOU-KO-LEV!!! The panes are called Yak for a reason, they are not freaking Yuk-s... ?!
It's just a misspelling but damn, no need to get fixated over one small detail
@@yolkman9000 ок, UK-47!
Успокойся. Как будто он должен русский язык знать.
I CANT PRONOUNCE IT
Yak 141: youre stealth, you're nothing but a cheap copy.
F35: no no, im the upgrade
Вот бы возобновить производство этих самолетов , да и на каждый из строящихся в Керчи УДК проекта 23900 авиагруппу в 16-20 таких самолетов, в дополнение к вертолетам!
Смысл, надо делать лучше, выше, сильнее
“F-35, I am your father”,
...." Noooooooo.."
😂😂
In all honesty I question the Yak 141 influence on the F35. Lockheed purchasing the aircraft mostly to take a glimpse on VTOL devlopment of thier adversary more than to study since the X-35 prototype already done it's first VTOL flight before Lockheed Martin studied the Yak.
@@minhquang2640 and you are?
@@MrJakeMallard he's not wrong, the design is inspired by the Convair Model 200, not the 141. The 141 was used to help with not having to worry about teething problems
Lockheed for only $5 milo purshased plans for Yak 14 (141) even 2 fuselage back in 1992 after Soviet colapes
In 1991, Lockheed entered a deal with Yakolev to develop prootypes of the Yak 141. In 1995, Lockheed began developing the F35. It's no surprise that both jets look alike.
I know what was happening in my country in 1991: "evil soviets went aways and good capitalist sold everything including this plane". The idea itself that you can have a foreign corporation affiliated with same foreign military to "help you develope prototypes" is beyond redicilous.
"In 1995, Lockheed began developing the F35. It's no surprise that both jets look alike."(sic)
The Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert JSF patent is dated May 1990.
@@AA-xo9uw Nope 1993. They patented different variant which are copies of the Yak. And used the technology from that plane in their F35s.
This jet kinda has gotten it's name in my cool and beautiful jets book.
It's genuinely funny that people are trying to argue that LM didn't use Yakovlev tech in the F-35, considering this fact has been known for 25+ years, mainly due to the fact that LM used to openly brag about it in interviews and constantly tell people how much better it was than the British style used in the Harrier or the X-32. Of course they went quiet on the subject after Putin came along and the US/Russia became less buddy, but it's not like the articles/etc aren't still easily locatable via Google searches.
It’s literally a falsehood Lockheed didn’t use anything from the 141
@@prodigy-hu6dy You sound extremely pathetic.
@@prodigy-hu6dy Wrong. Like I said, back in the 90s LM used to openly brag about how their partnership with Lockheed on the X-35 propulsion was way better than MD's partnership with BAE or what Boeing had going on in the X-32.
I.E In 2002 Lockheed Martin JSF leader Tom Burbage said in an interview with Air Force magazine that their biggest gamble was the lift system in the STOVL version of the X-35 which used a swivel-down rear exhaust licensed from the Yakovlev design bureau in Russia (which tried it out on the Yak-141 STOVL fighter). On an interesting note, in 1995 Lockheed Martin's president of aeronautics Mickey Blackwell said that the company only partnered with Yakovlev on the lift system because British Aerospace had already partnered with McDonnel Douglas for the JSF program.
Which means that if UK competition laws had allowed BAE to work with both LM and MD then the Boeing X-32 would have won the JSF competition.
The idea for the rotating duct came from the heating duct aisle at the hardware store! 😂
I saw one of those ducts yesterday at the hardware store and inevitably thought of this aircraft.
😂 👍🍻
The rotating duct nozzle had already been demonstrated in a Rolls Royce MTU engine for the German VJ 101E. There is even one in a museum display. Rolls-Royce/MAN Turbo RB.153.
You can find images but it has to be for the "E" version VJ 101E
@@williamzk9083 really? You mean you are unaware that the VJ101 was using a Bristol Pegasus AFTER the Harrier was in service? Also that it was a dead end because it supplemented the Pegasus with additional lift engines.
@@uingaeoc3905 You are wrong. No version of the supersonic VJ101 A/B/C/D/E was to use a Pegasus or anything related. You are thinking of the VAK 191 which was a different aircraft. It used a scaled down Pegasus combined with vertical lift engines to try to achieved better fuel consumption and range.
Reminds me of some info that Elon Musk & SpaceX get their rocket designs from ex Soviet designs. While no hard proof such thing happened, its difficult to deny that at least SpaceX rocket designs were inspired by those ex Soviet designs. Also Musk travelled to Russia couple of times before SpaceX become a real rocket launch & recovery company. The US government & aerospace company also actually know that there are a lot of great ideas & designs from Soviet engineers/scientist, but they just try to down play it as good as possible.
Other than surface level things like "this rocket has a lot of engines like that one soviet rocket", there's no shot spacex designs rockets based off of soviet designs.
Starship and the n27(?) both have a lot of engines, but that's the only thing you can say about the two.
@@pandaman2840Elon himself has a bunch of RD180 engines and he loves them.
It would explain why Musk is such a shill for Russia.
@@dgdave2673 I know you never said he was, but just want to clarify for all that Musk is not an engineer. Dude’s just an investor. He doesn’t know what he’s looking at when he sees advanced design information and blueprints.
The Yak 41/141 is a lightweight export version. Russia planned a version of the Yak 43 for itself.
I forgot just how far ahead that this jet design was. I had fogotten that the design was that old.
Great engineering !
Yak 41 hit the deck because the main engine sucked in exhaust fumes. That's why the Yak 141's auxiliary engines are positioned at an angle of 85° (the Yak 41 has 90°) to blow the products towards the rear of the aircraft.
As soon as you said sponsered by War Thunder, I got an anime ad for War Thunder 💀
Интересные комментарии, вместо споров, я бы предпочел просто восхитится советской промышленностью, инженерами и конструкторами.
This marvelous soviet engineering technology of the late 70s was stolen from the Soviet Union after its collapse and used in US F-35 design for an aircraft with vertical takeoff.
At the same period of time, the Chinese stole the complete design of Mig-1.14 and created an exact copy of their own J-14 fighter jet. That's how the story goes.
This video is gonna be epic, the great Yak 141
مشاءالله عداد كاشفات لومبا ليزرية اخضر موجهة متطورة ومحركات نفاثة ذكية وسرعة وخفة وحاملة اوزان وفعالية وعلم وعمل وتجارب ونجاح وخبرة وقدرة وجودة واشكال ومختلفة واحجام
The forefather of F-35. I'm sure a lot of people will have hard time to believe, but it's technology is in F-35.
It is not the forefather of the F-35. They are actually very different. The Forefather of the F-35 is the Convair 200. Even the lift fan design of the F-35 goes back to American patents for 3 bearing swivel designs from the1960's. The Yak had three engines and the US F-35 has one. That should be your first clue.
@@wadopotato33 Of course they are different, there is mor than a decade between them. You're talking about 'patents', but Soviets put that in reality. After breakup of Soviet Union (under Yeltsin) Loockheed Martin took a share of Yakovlev Design Buro with 'intent' to help develop YAK-141 VTOL fighter, which was the first, somewhat operational plane to use swivelling nozzle design.. LM used that technology in developement of F-35.
@@fifi23o5 Incorrect. Pratt & Whitney patented and built the first swivel bearing nozzle in the 1960s not the thieves masquerading as engineers at Yakovlev. The patent that Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert filed for the JSF in May of 1990 is available to read online. Suggest you get yourself edified rather than continue parroting myths and urban legends, Fifi.
I'm sure Lockheed learn a lot from yak41@@wadopotato33
I just bought Yak 141 on war thunder yesterday, then the video about Yak 141 is posted, great!
That's a beautiful plane.
Russia already developed its own F-35, 30 years ago. 👍👍
the USA just stole all the technology of changing the thrust vector
Which Murica copied...
@@georgedvorak9481 When economic crisis engulfed the newly created Russia. They sold some of it's tech to US in exchange for $.
That is the dumbest thing I have heard in a long time. They, other than being superficially a similar size are not really alike. Firstly, the F-35 is stealthy and is run by a supercomputer. The Yak is about as stealthy as a brick and not much smarter. Even the lift fan or how they hover are different.
Not many who know would call these planes similar, let alone call a Russia Yak a Russian F-35. Not at all similar.
@@georgedvorak9481 They aren't the same. The lift fan design was patented in 1960's and the F-35 shares more with the Convair 200 and other planes than it does with a Yakolev. Even the lift fans and how they work are very different.
What you are saying is often said, but that doesn't make it any truer.
It is a dumb idea.
It is theorized that the reason why the Soviet Navy wasn't given so much priority in its early days was because of Stalin's distrust of the Navy following the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921.
Bullshit... Under Stalin the Navy was introducing new ships and modernizing old ones. By 1937 the linear cruisers "Gangut", "Petropavlovsk" and "Sevastopol" were radically modernized. New light cruisers "Kirov", "Voroshilov", "Molotov" and "Maxim Gorky" were built, and also "Krasniy Kavkaz", "Chervona Ukraina" and "Profintern" were modernized. In 1939 the Navy included the fundamentally new high-speed multipurpose leaders of the destroyers "Moscow", "Leningrad", "Tashkent", "Kharkov", "Minsk", "Tbilisi" and "Baku".
Don't make a maniac out of Stalin... Just read the statistics of the development of the USSR during his rule, when the annual economic growth of the country was 13.8%. No one else in the world had or will have such a growth...
The USSR didn't need a navy and it wasn't given priority until the other two and more important branches were brought up to good standards
I love the Yak141 cgi, looks impressive. 😍👍
Not just inspired F-35, at the time Lockheed went and studied the Yak-141
👍
Not quite
Real inspiration would be Convair Model 200, the design of VTOL navy jet from 1970s completed with design of 3-section nozzle (so the nozzle design isn't new when Yak-141 came around). US navy want VTOL jet for quite a long time.
Yes, LM and Yak had made a deal to furthur F-35 development but by the time the deal came through X-35B VTOL already ready for testing, as we knew the design of new aircraft takes years to desgin so LM did their design long before Yak deal.
So other than data to help refined final design of F-35, the fundamental is difference. Nozzle design came from Conviar Model 200, the superior new lift-fan design replaced other lift jet and so on.
@@DOSFS This, the soviets stole American R&D ideas (stealing other people's stuff is basically all they ever did) but simply did not have the technological sophistication to figure out how to make it work "well enough".
@@robertsmith4681 So American are dumb enough to buy back their own RD data????
@@LordEmperorHyperion Ok? What the point about the bank have to do with VTOL development? Sorry bros, I didn't take Anti US propangada just to be edgy.
Other than similar nozzle design (which again already have idea and some early design work on in US defense sector since 1970s), both design literally have nothing in common. Did Yak-141 have lift-fan or data-links?
as cool as the vtol design is I always found the tail goofy
it looks epic imo
It looks futuristic
@@symon3210 looks like a Soviet retro future plane
@@Twiggo_The_Foxxo uhh,it’s already soviet😅
@@symon3210 I will say the side profile does and the vtol design is but still gives cold war vibes
Just a clarification on the F35B thrust vectoring system: it actually was from an earlier patent from 1967 from pratt and whitney. The main contribution from the Yakolev was the test data on the engine.
The blueprints of the engine layout were also given by Yakloev and they are similar in some Ways. As we see the spefic vectoring system is similar
@@kgb1632 By "given" you mean sold. The thrust vectoring system is actually quite different. The F-35 design is really more like the Convair 200 and the US already had patents dealing with 3 bearing swivel nozzles long before they worked with Yakolev. They also built the Harrier under licence. The fact that Yakolev used three engines (two of which were dead weight in flight) and the F-35 uses one engine and a lift fan, should tell you that they are not that similar and that the F-35 is far from being a copy. They are really quite different.
@@wadopotato33 Except that they had both patents for single engine and the triple engine configuration just like in the Yak plane. Regardless they did obtain it and did use it in their development of the F35. It obviously wasn't a full copy. But it does have some research and development of the Yak plane in it.
What a beautiful plane
America turning the inlets 90°, painting it a new shade of grey, and adding a NASA pc to a yak-141 and calling it an "incredible feat of engineering"
Literally an entirely different system lol
Can't be any more incorrect than this statement right here
How hard is it to pronounce "Yakolev"?!
if you kinda squint and turn your head it actually does bear a resemblance to the F35. one of the coolest aircraft i only recently learned about. cool video
The design was legally adopted for f35..... Technology transfer was done by Yakelov in exchange of good amount. Yekelov was in bad phase by then. So the resemblance is not just coincidence..
Simple and yet sophisticated & deadly..Pure class
Watching from Somalia
This is the most beautiful fighter jet that i ever seen. Bulky yet slick design, aggressive too, i love the use of angles and the Vtol Platform adds a lot of charm to the overhaul design. Shame it ended so quickly
+
Мне больше всех нравится Миг 31. В рекламе немецкого шоколада Ritter Sport есть слоган Quadratisch, Praktisch, Gut. Вот это можно применить и к Миг 31. Он грозен и красив. У него нет ничего лишнего.
Whos ..you kov lev
Yak of...lev ...😂
Not even kidding I was joking with my friend yesterday about getting a VTOL jet because you could "take" it anywhere and we joked about getting one of these
Your videos never fail to impress me. Keep making awesome content!
Cool plane... It would be good to see a modern version of this aircraft👍
F-35 Lightning II - build over the concept of the Yak 141. So much that if the Yak hadn't been built - the F-35 wouldn't have existed in the form it has.
F35
YAK 41: I am your father...
F35: Nooooooooooooooo
Damn what an awesome plane! Would be interesting if it was put into service, how Russian naval aviation would look like
If West dont hate them so much they could all work together
They had very few of the Yak-38 and they repainted the numbers on them from time to time in an attempt to give the impression that it was more of them than it actually was.
At one point I was not sure what aircraft you were talking about. Yukolev? What's so hard to pronounce Yak-ov--lev? For a commoner it's not a big deal, but when your job is to TALK about things, than do the job properly. Good content, other ways. As usually.
Я - ков - лев.
Это проблема яндекс переводчика видео
Well there is a misunderstanding here. Yak 41 and Yak 141 are two different planes with 2 different engines. Initially only Yak 41 has been built. Unfortunately it was full success with vertical landing and flying. The problem was that the engine was to week to carry any load except the plane it self. And it was slow - it wasn't supersonic. Then Yak 141 has been born with it's supersonic engine. It also has completely different fuselage.
you have confused the Yak 38 and the Yak 41 (Alas, the Yak 41 / 141 is the same plane) th-cam.com/video/4TIbutZN4_8/w-d-xo.html
I was literally waiting for this
Why do you pronounce it as "yukolev" instead of "yakovlev"?
Reminds me of the recent war thunder update “sky guardians”
This plane also starred in the PS2 game Heatseeker.
Locked Martin be like: lets copy this plane to win the joint strike fighter project.
Incorrect
correct @@AA-xo9uw
so the tech used by American lockheed martin on F35's vertical landing was a Russian tech. Amazing and brilliant Russian Engineers.
"so the tech used by American lockheed martin on F35's vertical landing was a Russian tech."(sic)
A myth perpetuated by the ignorant and the thieves masquerading as engineers at Yakovlev.
The yak-141 crawled so the F-35 could walk 🔥🔥🔥
The multiple engine design is ingenious. The German Dornier VTOL also used the same philosophy.
A little trivia' The designer of the F35 and Lockheed won lots of awards for this design claim it to be original. But in reality, it was developed in Communist Russia to start and then the Russian Republic. So In reality Lockheed most likely discouraged Yak from further development as to not have any competition.
Россия продала эту технологию Англии. Наши инжинеры посчитали такую конструкцию преждевременной. И во многом оказались правы. Кроме вертикального взлёта и посадки этот самолёт проигрывал буквально во всём истребителю классической схемы. Есть версия что это было сделано намеренно, что бы пустить запад по ложному пути.
About the rotating duct system: it wasn't directly derived from Yakovlev's design, but rather Lockheed (after taking a look at yak-141 ducting system) dusted off the blueprints from Convair model 200's movable exhaust duct
@@Feroce yeah, because us Ruskies are incapable of creative thought, and can only parasite off the omniscient Anglo, right?
@@Feroce the yak was made before the f35
@@اسكندرفكار He's talking about the Convair 200 (1970s), not the F35
@@thundercactus the yak 141 is very deffrent and more advanced than that plane
Exactly.
Cooperation with Lockheed
Following the announcement by the CIS in September 1991 that it could no longer fund development of the Yak-41M, Yakovlev entered into discussions with several foreign partners who could help fund the program. Lockheed Corporation, which was in the process of developing the X-35 for the US Joint Strike Fighter program, stepped forward, and with their assistance aircraft 48-2 was displayed at the Farnborough Airshow in September 1992. Yakovlev announced that they had reached an agreement with Lockheed for funds of $385 to $400 million for three new prototypes and an additional static test aircraft to test improvements in design and avionics. Planned modifications for the proposed Yak-41M included an increase in STOL weight to 21,500 kg (47,400 lb). One of the prototypes would have been a dual-control trainer. Though no longer flyable, both 48-2 and 48-3 were exhibited at the 1993 Moscow airshow. The partnership began in late 1991, though it was not publicly revealed by Yakovlev until 6 September 1992, and was not revealed by Lockheed until June 1994.[9]
Paraphrasing wackypedia puts your credibility in the commode.
The date of the filing for the Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert JSF patent was May 1990 and Yak never did deliver the four additional aircraft that they accepted the money for, did they?
I think the small fact that there was destined to be no functioning carriers also might have killed it off as well.
Время испытаний этого самолёта Советский Союз достраивал на стапелях в Николаеве свой первый атомный авианосец.
The USSR Navy included five heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers (TAVKR) - Kyiv, Minsk, Novorossiysk, Baku and Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov. Two more ships (nuclear engine) - "Varyag" and "Ulyanovsk" - were under construction.
I don’t get why one hard landing was considered its death (apart from the financial issues). Are you telling me an F-35 has never made a hard landing while under development?
When I've seen it in a game long time ago, wargame red dragon, I fell in love with it forever...
I wonder why the Russians never tried making the YAK-141 again. There definitely would have been many takers.
No money
The renamed Yak-141 was a failure and even with Lockheed's help Yakovlev couldn't find anyone willing to buy it.
War Thunder is heavy on the pockets... also it's better played on PC for aerial combat, I can't control any plane with the joystick in RB!! Tried to calibrate the complex control option without success, the planes are uncontrollable.
Please give us your honest review of the following VTOLs: Focke Achgelis FA-223 Drache, Doak VZ-4 and William X-Jet
Yak 41 M é uma máquina incrível, muito revolucionária
so it was Russia who built the first hovering/vertical take off and landing fighter jets. I thought it was US pioneered in it when i saw F35
Since the F-35 wasn't even close to the first...and neither was the Yak. No, just no.
UK Harrier first flight was in 1967 and the concept for a VTOL aircraft is probably as old as helicopters themselves
edit: harrier 2 first flight was 1985, harrier 1 was a lot earlier in 1967
"so it was Russia who built the first hovering/vertical take off and landing fighter jets."(sic)
Incorrect.
@@juhotuho10 "UK Harrier first flight was in 1985"(sic)
You're off by over two decades.
@@juhotuho10 " harrier 2 first flight was 1985"(sic)
Incorrect, again. First flight was in November 1981.
Not an aeronautics expert here but I really wish the Soviets would've made the wings a bit bigger on these old cold war designs of theirs. It seemed to me that back then they were obsessed with top speed so all their fighters from this era look like they would have very limited maneuverability. Compare these designs to modern day Russian fighters which are almost all wing with a couple of engines a cockpit attached.
The MiG series had great maneuverability (even the Sukhoi counterparts).
Except for the 25s and 31s I think, but they had large wings. Ur getting confused the meaning of maneuverability.
Longer wings means greater lift but the bigger the wing means more drag and it would slow down the aircraft *immensely* while turning.
A larger wing can create a tighter turn; however, a tighter turn at a given speed creates more g-forces and therefore requires a structurally heavier wing. A shorter wing can have excellent roll rate.
So a wing of that size is better than a long ungainly wing.
I hope this helped.
russian old tech is american new tech
I’ve got to say the Boeing X-32 has got to be the most goofy looking jet fighter in history. Just as well they went with the Lockheed X-35 design even if it was for the looks alone.
There was no funding for the Yak-141 program from Lockheed. I talked with one of the Yak-38 developers. For bribes, the Yak-141 technologists were handed over to Lockheed.
There was. And it is a matter of public record. I talked with one of the Yak developers...I know which source I would trust. Get your third party heresay outta here.
Suggest you read the actual patent that Lockheed/Bevilaqua/Shumpert filed for the JSF in May 1990. It uses absolutely nothing found on the Yak.
@@AA-xo9uw Is it possible to get acquainted with the secret sections too? One gets the feeling that you have the education and brains of a five-year-old child.
Many people do not even know that it was the Russians who invented vertical takeoff and landing, as well as the technology of stealth, and much more,
The reason why people don't know this^^ is because it's complete fiction.
Not unless it had the avionics of the MiG-31.
engine on this aircraft is SO powerful. they had to redesign structural stiffening, first testing tore engine right through top of the plane at full throttle when hovering
Lockheed bought this design After the USSR breakup
Incorrect
I saw an interview with the designers of the YAK company. They said that they had sold to the Americans, among other things, the development of an aircraft with one engine for flight and for vertical ascent into the air. And the Americans used this option.
Small mistake in the first seconds. Unlike the F-35, it couldn't go afterburner in VTOL mode.
What the hell is afterburner in VTOL mode?! The Yak-41 takes off vertically with a full combat load. Or maybe from a shortened run-up. And its afterburner, in this mode, works like the f-35, which cannot take off vertically, but only from a run-up.
I want Vietnam to have a self-developed fighter jet project. I am Vietnamese and I will follow your videos on TH-cam.
being all Russian aviation industry companies are now one company, they should have yak (and mig) subdivisions as well as some of the other companies lost to time for projects they were known to do in their past!
When will the Video about the F-15EX come out ?
3:00 yeah it will just take over a year to unlock
You pronounce "Yak" correctly but then butcher Yakolev, how? It's not you-koh-lev....
Yak-141 to F-35:
"Lightining, I'm your father."
F-35:
"NOOOOOOOOOOOO!"
Yak 141 had such a amazing design the US had used it to base its design on the f35.
That is false. They aren't the same. The US F-35 has one engine. The Yak had three. The US held patents on 3 bearing swivel designs going back to the 1960's. The real forefather of the F-35 is the Convair 200, not the Yakolev. Sorry, you are wrong.
@@wadopotato33I don’t know what part of “base” do you not understand. No one had made the idea of a after burning VTOL capable possible. The United States bought a prototype of one of the remaining Yak-41 left. 2 decades later revealing the F-35. I don’t know where the idea of not being the exact same dictates that it wasn’t based and token inspiration from. Take for example the J-20. Explain why everyone calls it a copy.
@@wadopotato33 the Convair 200 was never as capable as the Yak-141. It a proposed design. It never join service. Also the Convair 200 uses 3 engines. So I don’t know how you got that idea
So now you think Lockheed Martin copied its design for F-35 right. But noo, it isn't that 3BSN & VTovl system was patented by Lockheed & Pratt&W in late 60's
Arghh. "Yukolev"? Have you tried to read this name properly at all?
*Unlike the British Jumpjet, Russian's Jumpjet has two engines. If one engine failed or not sychronised, the jet will fly like a prime water hose.*
When Russians improve on a western design - they copy. When the Americans improve on the Soviet design - they were inspired!
Well you could say the yak was a copy or inspired by the convair model 200
@@diltzm who actually knew anything about Model 200 till 5 years ago, and how Yakovlev buro would know back in 80s?
Russia never improves upon US designs
we're speaking english = western perspective. In Russia they would say they were inspired and the US copied
The rotating duct nozzle had already been demonstrated in a Rolls Royce MTU engine for the German VJ 101D. There is even one in a museum display. Rolls-Royce/MAN Turbo RB.153.
You can find images but it has to be for the "E" version VJ 101E. It was also on the twin engine VJ 101E. I believe an American Convair 200 design also used it.
It was not a Russian invention. Lockheed-Martin used Yakolov as a consultancy to take advantage of their experience thereby making sure there were no surprises.
The YAK 141 was a disaster from it's very beginning , the YAK41 .
DON'T PLAY WAR-THUNDER IF YOU WANT TO keep your Mental Health (I have at least 4000 hours)
0:12: It’s Gorshkov.
The all vectored thrust Pegasus concept still trikes me as the best solution. The Yak 141 and f35 both have the same problem - complexity and dead weight of the lift engines/fan. The Harrier has had 60 years of operational experience with the supposed issue of hot gas reingestion not limiting the aircraft in any way operationally. Lockheed with their huge marketing department have tried to make it a fact but nearly 30 years after first flight of the x35 the basic problem with the f35b remains and it has not achieved anything like the operational success and flexibility of the Harrier and probably never will. The Yak-141 separate lift engine/fan is the wrong solution for a high performance combat jet. The Boeing x36 used the vectored thrust concept but blew it because they insisted on the weird nose intake and monolithic wing design. British Aerospace who were working with Boeing had a concept supersonic VSTOL concept in the early 1990s that used two conventional side intakes and a more conventional wing/stabiliser layout together with the triposter vectored trust engine the x36 had - and it was a great looking aircraft and in my view would have beaten the x35 hands down if the British had been listened to. It is almost as if Boeing never really wanted to win the x35/x36 competition in hindsight. One day perhaps someone will do the obvious and have another go at a supersonic vectored thrust (i.e. Pegasus like engine) combat jet and this time continue on from where the Harrier successfully left off. A case of the wrong people having the right idea. The British actually developed the Pegasus from a French concept apparently - so if the British can swallow their pride why can't the Yanks. If the Pegasus had been a US lead project the stealth VSTOL fighter of today would beyond doubt be vectored thrust not separate lift fan based.
"The all vectored thrust Pegasus concept still trikes me as the best solution."(sic)
A common belief of those who have never personally had to deal with the effects of the hot gas ingesting compressor stalls that the Pegasus is notorious for.
By the way, the Yak didn't utilize a lift fan but you have a duly noted aversion to facts.
Thank you . Great video.
anyone ever noticed how much it looks like the f 35?
I guess because of the engine nozzle and the twin tail but that's about it
Similar technical task results in similar results.
Actually US brought the Yak-141 to US after the dissolution of USSR and later stole the tech including the design which now they implemented it in F-35. This fact is very hard to accept for Western fanboys.
Because the US f35 is inspired from the yak-141 a bit
If you want the Yak-141 in war thunder (and I have it) it will take about 2 or more years of playing daily. you can also buy a $70usd premium jet and grind the tech tree out in a month or so if your good.
Just sum it up with "results may vary"
not hard
we 4 friends played in turns, 4 hours each
16hrs per day for 100 days got us Mig 21 lol (fast but needs people)
@@karantikoo9302 that's some thinking out the box bs right there 🤣🤣