Lets clarify here, guy built a park that is open to the public. It has picnic tables, garbage cans etc. Ironically its on park property and he is maintaining it. He doesnt call it his property, he says its the neighborhoods. There is no issue here and why is the news station pushing the issue. Go down the street and find the lots where people fenced it off as private property.
Both are in the wrong because its not their land to do what they want. Thats likengoing in some woods you don't own and cutting down trees, and planting a food plot for hunting because "no one is using it". That doesn't matter its not his property
Let’s clarify your statement here: he also built a driveway and fences around the space. This isn’t so altruistic move. He wanted a nice spot he could have to himself or probably rent out to friends and relatives. For parties or get togethers, things like that. Dude didn’t spend 25k to get nothing back from it lmao he had to of known this would be called in eventually.
Help me understand: a squatter can take over your vacant house/property, and within a short amount of time has full rights over that property, but when actual property owners do the same thing and invest their own money, the city can “enforce” some type of removal and or violation fees? Sounds like BS to me
Has nothing to do with people extending their yard on Easements Having no city parks is no reason for crime Lack of Tax base the reason we are in this mess
So if you abandon your property and someone squats on it they can take it over in the name of preventing blight. But if the city abandons property and you try to keep it from becoming squalor it's against the law. But then again, no point enforcing it when they get free upkeep.
@@johnnynephrite6147😂 maintain my arse that bike trail is dangerous dirty and full of tents tweakers & trash ALL except where these folks don't allow it the leadership does NOTHING !!
I used to walk down the path there. George had closed gates on the public space for the longest time. He must have started to take out the fencing when he was formally notified about it being public space. Why is he playing the altruism card now?
I think DavidGutierrez-kh3qs may have made a error and admitted that George has enjoyed his illegal extended backyard for “at least 15 years”. most likely the $25,000 (minus any revenue he may have incurred when he invited friends/family/? to enjoy the activities he illegally installed on city property) extended to installed equipment for activities; the cost may have included all the supplies for the bat cage, basketball court that just disappeared (when it became public knowledge that home owners near the parkway have been illegally extending their backyards. His property should only be est 10000 sq ft
DavidGutierrez-kh3qs just admitted George has enjoyed the “community” space for at least 15 years. lol if George as so transparent, he should admit where his real property ends with real evidence and not just his “word” as an altruistic “community” member
This is crazy I got 2 $54 parking tickets for parking in front of my house on the curb because people drive extremely fast down my street. the city doesn't hold Speeders or property theives accountable they don't install speed bumps I get $109.00 worth of tickets for parking in front of my house but these people can extend their backyards into city property and no problem.
Not really sure why this is such a problem. It’s not there land and they are keeping it up and the city wasn’t doing anything.Find something else to complain about.
Don’t forget the legal term “adverse possession”. That homeowner maintains that piece of encroached land for 10 years and he can claim it as his unless the city takes legal action now. Seen several court cases in Missouri exactly like this. One of them the homeowner built a detached double car garage back there, waited his 10 years, took the city to court and won. Don’t believe the homeowners are doing this to enrich the community, they are playing the long game to enrich their wealth.
A whole tent city will be there soon. Temporary housing for drug addicts. This man is TAKING that space from them. Who do these property owners think they are cleaning up and maintaining their communities?!?!
It’s under the high voltage power lines. This isn’t prime real estate. What’s the harm here? As long as they don’t build a garage on it, or put in a pool and a fence. 🤨
Did you really make this comment without knowing how big the area is and how many families are doing it? This guy is just 1…. There are some who section it off for their own property… and there are others who literally turned it into a public park with picnic tables and a basketball court…. Get your facts right brother. Laughable
@@meanmachine99999 - Well I see why your name is Mean machine. Because your comment is mean spirited. I don’t know the entire story… I just watched the video. So yeah… I don’t know all the facts. And I clearly state “as long as they’re not building fences or garages, or pools”, so the people you are referring to are Not the ones I’m talking about. Maybe read others comments more thoroughly in the future… 🙄 Laughable…
@@valiant360420 if you see the last part of my sentence you can clearly see it was geared towards the one other guy who commented and not you specifically... i used his tag line and everything... idk why it didnt tag him hope this clears up the misunderstanding
Man leave that man alone! He ain't hurting anyone & it's not like he's claiming the property is his private property it's open to the community! Plus he maintains it on his own dime & time, what's really the problem here?!? If not for him that area would either be full of homeless people, a tent city or a fire hazard or all of the above! Again leave that man alone he ain't hurting anyone, if anything he's making his part of that neighborhood safer by keeping all the homeless out.
I was thinking so what, people are planting lettuce on city property whats the big deal. Boy was I surprised. The gall of this fool to say he put in a driveway and a fence "for the community". Clearly a liar.
The homeowners who made the extended improvements are doing it for themselves. If you walk down the path George’s efforts is the biggest, but he had it fenced off private use probably until he got a formal notification from the government. It’s great he’s saying what he is saying but consider the historical proof, he benefited from the improvements more because he fenced it off for a long time for personal benefits. He has a b-ball court, but why’d he take it down? Did he take it down around the same time he took down the fencing of the space he developed?
The people that think this is ok, go to some city owned land and poured cement and put up a fence and basket ball court. Does that make sense because "they are not using it".
@@maxhauler I played football in a yard the size of a park, between houses in the 70s. The fascination with fencing off every square acre to call your own, and demanding that noone ever touch your precious yard is a trend from the fascist 80s, and suburban sprawl that just never died.
Adverse Possession: If they come onto the property, and maintain it long enough, it becomes theirs. The city needs to draft encroachment agreements with the neighbors, and then allow them to enter city property.
They would have to possess, maintain, and pay property taxes on the property for a minimum of five years before any judge would consider an adverse possession claim.
This whole time I thought the home owners were just building wider fencing, furthering thier acres of land on city property - or perhaps building too high of a shed or something. Seems like the guy who spent 25k to help the city was doing it out of his own heart.
It is not their property, plain and simple. They do not have the legal right to build anything on it. It is an easement, it is not part of their backyard.
I'm not a person who is reflexively anti-government. However, this is a great example of government idiocy. These people are doing no harm. In fact, they're actually doing the city and the citizens a favor. Leave them alone.
What was the easement for originally? Usually there is something buried that you can't build permanent structures over, like piped canals, maybe an old rail line, etc.
The railroad and utilities Its zoned for that Laws are not optional We have new arrivals that think its like their old country where they can build without permits etc
He is breaking the law. What if he goes to a public park your family frequents and fences off space for his own private use. Letting this slide or having legislation to support private citizens to claim public space as their own will open a can of worms for future criminals to claim public space.
Seems like neighbors just made a park to me. If they are taking responsibility for their neighborhood without attempting to take ownership of the land, what's the problem? They've objectively improved the space.
Note: in 10 years they can claim the land as theirs as they improved and maintained it, not the city. They haven’t prevented the city from maintaining it because they are so their claim will win. Adverse Possession of land, google it.
$50 says the city has never maintained the property and let the weeds grow tall right next to his house, so he had to clean it up because of the fire hazard.
The news just wants to start things... if the news didn't say anything it would be left alon... it looks nice there I would like to see more places like it..
In Tracy western pacific rd off corral hollow rd the people who live in there extended there fence in to the train tracks looks horrible lots of trash and random cars and rvs parked along the road
funny. i hear sac and think newsom...i hear this story and go now you care where the walls and fences are...maybe care about a wall on the southern border...
Vacant lots, not garden plots. Thanks for nothing Heather Fargo. And the trees you planted in the roads died. Great planing and a waste of money for your vanity projects that lasted just long enough.
It looks great. It’s a nice thing to do and if you guys go and try and make them stop it it’s gonna look like garbage way to go politicians way to go and news.
The creek and river and coast and park and forests and abandoned houses or vacant property has a several million property that the federal courts and banks are trying to clear after court orders and the more difficult sheriff clandestine county claims and welfare institutions groupings etc. Armed conflicts and fences and gates and walls have been stolen etc.
What does anyone care? As long as its beautifully maintain, shared with public, no fences or gates. If you are one of those whining you can always have the homeless move in with trash, drugs and poop.
There are fences, gates, and anyone walking past would assume it is private property. His sharing it with the public means his next door neighbors only. He would have a conniption fit if you and your buddies showed up for a picnic.
Dang the city should give him a maintenance budget and thank him for taking care of it cheaper than their own staff. Plus it's a heck of a lot better than a drug encampment so who cares
I used to walk down the road. He had that space all fenced up for personal use. He must have put the fencing down when he was formally notified of his error.
So it’s ok for the homeless, mentally ill, and drug addicted to trash the area but not ok for the tax-payer (whose taxes go partly to support the homeless) to use their own money to improve and maintain the area that cannot be properly maintained by government due to diversion of funding?
@@lazynow1 you can never take someone’s word sometimes just because it’s on camera, there are beaches that are supposed to be open to the public that some property owners try to close to the public
Thats not how it works We are turning into Latin America where legality relative Hence food vendors ignoring health laws and taxes Hence people building unpermitted structures You might think its great but try to sue and collect from those folks
But you can put up a tent on the sidewalk, with trash, sleep there and eat there. Glad Sacramento city is doing their job……
Where else do you want homeless to go lol
@@LegitnessCenter you’re okay with them being out?
@@jonsutubechannel i just mind my buisness all they can do is have more security’s/ police patrolling
@@LegitnessCenter if you don’t mind them being out then what do you want security or police to do? Lol
@@jonsutubechannel patrol lol have them do there job
Lets clarify here, guy built a park that is open to the public. It has picnic tables, garbage cans etc. Ironically its on park property and he is maintaining it. He doesnt call it his property, he says its the neighborhoods. There is no issue here and why is the news station pushing the issue. Go down the street and find the lots where people fenced it off as private property.
I went to that "park" with some friends to play soccer and he ran us off saying it was his property.
Both are in the wrong because its not their land to do what they want. Thats likengoing in some woods you don't own and cutting down trees, and planting a food plot for hunting because "no one is using it". That doesn't matter its not his property
It is not their land and if you want to be a fool and spend $20k on it you are a even bigger fool.
Let’s clarify your statement here: he also built a driveway and fences around the space.
This isn’t so altruistic move. He wanted a nice spot he could have to himself or probably rent out to friends and relatives. For parties or get togethers, things like that.
Dude didn’t spend 25k to get nothing back from it lmao he had to of known this would be called in eventually.
You can throw as much dust in the air as you want but it is not his property period. Can I build on your property and maintaining it and call it mine?
Help me understand: a squatter can take over your vacant house/property, and within a short amount of time has full rights over that property, but when actual property owners do the same thing and invest their own money, the city can “enforce” some type of removal and or violation fees? Sounds like BS to me
Why don't the City put effort to make South Natomas more family friendly like they do for the North! Fix and update our parks.
Has nothing to do with people extending their yard on Easements
Having no city parks is no reason for crime
Lack of Tax base the reason we are in this mess
UPDATE PARKS..? WHAT ABOUT MORE ENDLESS WASTEFUL WARS??
So if you abandon your property and someone squats on it they can take it over in the name of preventing blight. But if the city abandons property and you try to keep it from becoming squalor it's against the law. But then again, no point enforcing it when they get free upkeep.
City never abandoned it. In fact they maintain the bike path that runs through it. Get a clue.
@@johnnynephrite6147😂 maintain my arse that bike trail is dangerous dirty and full of tents tweakers & trash ALL except where these folks don't allow it the leadership does NOTHING !!
I used to walk down the path there. George had closed gates on the public space for the longest time. He must have started to take out the fencing when he was formally notified about it being public space. Why is he playing the altruism card now?
Facts I always thought it was their property
Never been gated, at least for the past 15 years
@@DavidGutierrez-kh3qs yes it was and not too long ago they removed it
I think DavidGutierrez-kh3qs may have made a error and admitted that George has enjoyed his illegal extended backyard for “at least 15 years”. most likely the $25,000 (minus any revenue he may have incurred when he invited friends/family/? to enjoy the activities he illegally installed on city property) extended to installed equipment for activities; the cost may have included all the supplies for the bat cage, basketball court that just disappeared (when it became public knowledge that home owners near the parkway have been illegally extending their backyards. His property should only be est 10000 sq ft
DavidGutierrez-kh3qs just admitted George has enjoyed the “community” space for at least 15 years. lol if George as so transparent, he should admit where his real property ends with real evidence and not just his “word” as an altruistic “community” member
This is crazy I got 2 $54 parking tickets for parking in front of my house on the curb because people drive extremely fast down my street. the city doesn't hold Speeders or property theives accountable they don't install speed bumps I get $109.00 worth of tickets for parking in front of my house but these people can extend their backyards into city property and no problem.
I got 2 tickets for parking in my driveway because my truck was halfway into the sidewalk 💀
Totally different issue
@@galaxiax3284 thats your own fault dude. obey the rules.
@@johnnynephrite6147 what rule that I can’t park in my own driveway?
@@galaxiax3284😅 if you're parking in your driveway and your truck is still partly into the sidewalk, there's some other issues there.
Leave these folks alone.
Yet , the homeless can have it to destroy it and trash 🗑️ it !
Not really sure why this is such a problem. It’s not there land and they are keeping it up and the city wasn’t doing anything.Find something else to complain about.
Imminent domain uno reverse card!
Typical, focusing on a non-issue! How about they report on the drug infested homeless encampments!
Don’t forget the legal term “adverse possession”. That homeowner maintains that piece of encroached land for 10 years and he can claim it as his unless the city takes legal action now. Seen several court cases in Missouri exactly like this. One of them the homeowner built a detached double car garage back there, waited his 10 years, took the city to court and won. Don’t believe the homeowners are doing this to enrich the community, they are playing the long game to enrich their wealth.
A whole tent city will be there soon. Temporary housing for drug addicts.
This man is TAKING that space from them. Who do these property owners think they are cleaning up and maintaining their communities?!?!
This man is TAKING property that isn't his to take, period.
It’s under the high voltage power lines. This isn’t prime real estate. What’s the harm here?
As long as they don’t build a garage on it, or put in a pool and a fence. 🤨
he build a driveway on it to his garage. do you really believe him when he says its for public use? laughable.
Did you really make this comment without knowing how big the area is and how many families are doing it? This guy is just 1…. There are some who section it off for their own property… and there are others who literally turned it into a public park with picnic tables and a basketball court…. Get your facts right brother. Laughable
@@meanmachine99999 - Well I see why your name is Mean machine. Because your comment is mean spirited.
I don’t know the entire story… I just watched the video. So yeah… I don’t know all the facts.
And I clearly state “as long as they’re not building fences or garages, or pools”, so the people you are referring to are Not the ones I’m talking about.
Maybe read others comments more thoroughly in the future… 🙄
Laughable…
@@valiant360420 if you see the last part of my sentence you can clearly see it was geared towards the one other guy who commented and not you specifically... i used his tag line and everything... idk why it didnt tag him hope this clears up the misunderstanding
@@valiant360420 oh come one everyone can't be snowflakes lmao damn Gen z😂😂
Man leave that man alone! He ain't hurting anyone & it's not like he's claiming the property is his private property it's open to the community! Plus he maintains it on his own dime & time, what's really the problem here?!? If not for him that area would either be full of homeless people, a tent city or a fire hazard or all of the above! Again leave that man alone he ain't hurting anyone, if anything he's making his part of that neighborhood safer by keeping all the homeless out.
The audacity of this man.
I was thinking so what, people are planting lettuce on city property whats the big deal. Boy was I surprised. The gall of this fool to say he put in a driveway and a fence "for the community". Clearly a liar.
He should send them an invoice for improvements, maintenance, and labor
They should send him an invoice for taking the property as his own
they are maintaining the property better then the city is...
The homeowners who made the extended improvements are doing it for themselves. If you walk down the path George’s efforts is the biggest, but he had it fenced off private use probably until he got a formal notification from the government. It’s great he’s saying what he is saying but consider the historical proof, he benefited from the improvements more because he fenced it off for a long time for personal benefits.
He has a b-ball court, but why’d he take it down? Did he take it down around the same time he took down the fencing of the space he developed?
Its an easement DUH
@@sirloxleymendoza972what does that mean? That’s a lame excuse.
@@TiredAmerican247 It is a lame excuse. And the home owners may have an easement but that gives them no right take it over or alter it.
@@johnnynephrite6147 the way they altered is it for the worse or better?
The owners do not have the community's best interests at heart; their intention is purely to take over.
The people that think this is ok, go to some city owned land and poured cement and put up a fence and basket ball court. Does that make sense because "they are not using it".
Nobody ask him to do it. And cause he decided to do it, now he thinks he deserves to own that piece of land? Trippen lol
EWB
For real. You don’t just get to say it’s my land because I spent money. I wouldn’t have spent a nickel b
@@EmptiedPocketsHomless doing it all the time
Did you watch the whole thing? He never said he owns it.
He didn’t say anything about owning it.
I desperately miss a world without fences.
@@maxhauler I played football in a yard the size of a park, between houses in the 70s. The fascination with fencing off every square acre to call your own, and demanding that noone ever touch your precious yard is a trend from the fascist 80s, and suburban sprawl that just never died.
um then like whats the driveway to your garage for?
the neighborhood making it look wayyyyy better... beautiful
And eminent domain over your property is illegal period
Property lines is Property lines & city Property is city property.. sucks but gotta get push back
I like this little spot the guy built back there that everybody could use. Don’t worry about the letter. The city is as lazy as a sloth.😂
Adverse Possession: If they come onto the property, and maintain it long enough, it becomes theirs. The city needs to draft encroachment agreements with the neighbors, and then allow them to enter city property.
AP doesn’t exist against public land and the encroachers are not paying the taxes.
They would have to possess, maintain, and pay property taxes on the property for a minimum of five years before any judge would consider an adverse possession claim.
There is no adverse possession in government property. SMH.
This whole time I thought the home owners were just building wider fencing, furthering thier acres of land on city property - or perhaps building too high of a shed or something.
Seems like the guy who spent 25k to help the city was doing it out of his own heart.
It is not their property, plain and simple. They do not have the legal right to build anything on it. It is an easement, it is not part of their backyard.
White men are entitled steal anything that isn’t nailed down. What if it isn’t nailed down? They just plant a flag and claim ownership anyway!
None of this damn land is anybody in that case
@@stevens.4125 What?
an easement in my neighborhood is getting smaller, because homeowners are increasing there backyards..
It looks like a perfect place for Sac to set up emergency shelters and tens for those struggling to find housing.
Leave these people alone..!they like thier neighborhood looking clean.
I'm not a person who is reflexively anti-government. However, this is a great example of government idiocy. These people are doing no harm. In fact, they're actually doing the city and the citizens a favor. Leave them alone.
So, who gets sued when someone gets injured or hurt or whatever on this property?
What was the easement for originally? Usually there is something buried that you can't build permanent structures over, like piped canals, maybe an old rail line, etc.
The railroad and utilities Its zoned for that
Laws are not optional We have new arrivals that think its like their old country where they can build without permits etc
@@sirloxleymendoza972this has nothing to do with immigrants, illegal or otherwise, ya fvckin racist.
The easement is most likely for the overhead powerlines.
Yes, we need to address this now....while others, freely relieve themselves on city sidewalks.
So what is the problem..????...and why does CBS care....with all the crime....????
Right?! Such a stupid story
He is breaking the law. What if he goes to a public park your family frequents and fences off space for his own private use. Letting this slide or having legislation to support private citizens to claim public space as their own will open a can of worms for future criminals to claim public space.
You obviously don't understand what is an Easement
Its land set aside for utilities or railroad It must be accessible Its not yours to take
@@sirloxleymendoza972 They can access it at any time...did you see any walls..???..you might want to get your eyes checked...
CBS is a rabble rouser and enemy of the American people.
Why is this news station so outraged about this?
Seems like neighbors just made a park to me.
If they are taking responsibility for their neighborhood without attempting to take ownership of the land, what's the problem? They've objectively improved the space.
Note: in 10 years they can claim the land as theirs as they improved and maintained it, not the city. They haven’t prevented the city from maintaining it because they are so their claim will win. Adverse Possession of land, google it.
Who is this bothering? It looks like a beautiful little community park!
If the citizens want to keep up the yard for everyone to enjoy, then let them.
$50 says the city has never maintained the property and let the weeds grow tall right next to his house, so he had to clean it up because of the fire hazard.
they're doing what the city is neglecting to do. they should be allowed to do so as long as it is public access
Lol these areas are otherwise unkept areas of dry weeds. What a joke, of all things for them to be concerned with…
If there are utilities there they must have access
But will he get a Reimbursement for his time and money on maintaining their property?
Nobody ever said where the issue was at
They can claim the property if they improve it even a little adverse acquisition it's in the laws folks
Looks like Sacramento can eat our shorts!
NOW if you do that then your taxes should be double correct???? 🤔🤔🤔
They should offer to sell the property exclusively and divided to the adjacent property owners. Or shared property by all of those adjacent
Jealous people complaining. Who are the complainers!?
Who does the city represent?
A waste of time and money when you have to deal local tyrants!!😂😂😂😂😂
The news just wants to start things... if the news didn't say anything it would be left alon... it looks nice there I would like to see more places like it..
In Tracy western pacific rd off corral hollow rd the people who live in there extended there fence in to the train tracks looks horrible lots of trash and random cars and rvs parked along the road
Sounds like he needs to send the city a bill for upkeeping the city property.
Seems like the news ch has the issue smh
thank god i live in northwest natomas
funny. i hear sac and think newsom...i hear this story and go now you care where the walls and fences are...maybe care about a wall on the southern border...
Vacant lots, not garden plots. Thanks for nothing Heather Fargo. And the trees you planted in the roads died. Great planing and a waste of money for your vanity projects that lasted just long enough.
Whats the problem again... ?
Neighbors are beautifying the walkway....
Something the city wont do ....
Bad Bad reporting !!!!
ITS NOT YOUR PROPERTY!!
We the people... Do not forget that....
@@timg2973
We the people shall pitch a.tent on your lawn…or does that not apply now?
@@timg2973 ALLIGATOR FARM INBOUND ON YOUR NEIGHBORS DRIVEWAY LOLZ
It’s taxpayer property..not city property…remember the government has no money of their own
Neighbors are willing maintain city land at their own expense, saving city tax payers money and not restrict access....where's the problem??
The government isn't get paid
So their stilling land ... its not theirs .... it belongs to the city
Leave them alone. Go find something else that’s actually important to deal with. Go help the homeless or something.
what is there to be concerned about here?
It looks great. It’s a nice thing to do and if you guys go and try and make them stop it it’s gonna look like garbage way to go politicians way to go and news.
They just want their taxes
Haters get a better story to report instead of community members making the community better !
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡
Why does cbs care
The creek and river and coast and park and forests and abandoned houses or vacant property has a several million property that the federal courts and banks are trying to clear after court orders and the more difficult sheriff clandestine county claims and welfare institutions groupings etc.
Armed conflicts and fences and gates and walls have been stolen etc.
What does anyone care? As long as its beautifully maintain, shared with public, no fences or gates. If you are one of those whining you can always have the homeless move in with trash, drugs and poop.
There are fences, gates, and anyone walking past would assume it is private property. His sharing it with the public means his next door neighbors only. He would have a conniption fit if you and your buddies showed up for a picnic.
Dang the city should give him a maintenance budget and thank him for taking care of it cheaper than their own staff. Plus it's a heck of a lot better than a drug encampment so who cares
I used to walk down the road. He had that space all fenced up for personal use. He must have put the fencing down when he was formally notified of his error.
💯💯💯
Looks like a park😊
Every property owner in Sacramento has a parcel with accurate parameters of their property. What y’all are doing is squatting on public property! 😆
Oh quit your crying... It's beautifully maintained
It takes more time working from home... 🤣 maybe when they get back to the office fulltime it will get taken care of.
Just make it a park
So it’s ok for the homeless, mentally ill, and drug addicted to trash the area but not ok for the tax-payer (whose taxes go partly to support the homeless) to use their own money to improve and maintain the area that cannot be properly maintained by government due to diversion of funding?
Folks bureaucracy at its finest,remove a clean,maintained and efficient space and leave homeless encampments to flourish,that’s not okay,come on man
The City, Home owners & Insurance will pay a lot of lawyers if someone gets injured in a mess like this -
Government busy bodies.
If these spaces are public then I would say ok but if any of these extensions are private then take it down
watch the video...they said anyone can use it........or did you hit your head...???
@@lazynow1 you can never take someone’s word sometimes just because it’s on camera, there are beaches that are supposed to be open to the public that some property owners try to close to the public
@@andytang04 go test it out since you have all the time in the world...dillhole...
ITS FREE REAL ESTATE
Why the hell do you care!?
Because that land is an easement there so railroad or utilities have access
@@silentmajority8365 let’s be real areas where the city drops the ball and doesn’t maintain. The city should compensate
Thats not how it works
We are turning into Latin America where legality relative
Hence food vendors ignoring health laws and taxes
Hence people building unpermitted structures
You might think its great but try to sue and collect from those folks
Lets be real city does not owe you zip City parks come from a tax base
a lack of a park does not justify building on Easements
@@mrtahoe By that logic if they have no funds to repair a sidewalk you can build a house there
Wait till they start having party's till dark see if it's for everyone lol bet they will be calling the cops saying get off my property lol
Only Californiaians can do such thing
Illegal backyard ?
Lol
bruh kept is nice...go report on something else
They said hey if the US govt and settlers can do it to Native Americans why can't we do the same thing to the government.
Sound like bunch of haters 😂😂
Please come out and Vote Blue Democrats care about your problems
So………..
Dude needs to mind his own business. He didn't pay for this land. Get over your ego sir. It's not yours to make changes to.
😂😂😂
You guys have been asking the city for MONTHS?? JESUS CHRIST HOW ABOUT YOU GUYS GET A LIFE.