Will this train cost the Alaskan pollock industry $350 million?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 พ.ค. 2024
  • The train ride taken by Alaskan pollock at Kloosterboer's Bayside facility.

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @Chrnan6710
    @Chrnan6710 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hysterical. Gonna be so sad to see this freak of nature go if the lawsuits end up that way :(

  • @mbfanz
    @mbfanz ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The Drive brought me here lol

    • @happycampertahoe
      @happycampertahoe ปีที่แล้ว

      Same...

    • @EnviroSteward
      @EnviroSteward ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mee too

    • @EnviroSteward
      @EnviroSteward ปีที่แล้ว

      Look at the stupid wasteful BS, our bureaucrats induce with their drivel...clown isht

  • @steve66oh
    @steve66oh ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought a 10 meter boat from Uncle Sam at a government auction. The boat was built in Norway for the U.S. Navy.
    Under Jones Act, to use this boat in "coastwise trade" (say.. a dive charter boat..), it must be U.S. built. There are exceptions though.. foreign-builds which are captured as war prize or seized/forfeit for smuggling or other lawbreaking... and then sold from U.S. federal custody at auction, qualify for these exceptions. My boat (like those..) was sold from Federal possession.. but mine LACKS THE CRIMINAL HISTORY necessary to qualify her for the exceptions which would make her eligible for coastwise trade.
    Instead of smuggling crap into the U.S., my boat spent 35 years SERVING the U.S. Navy.. and Jones Act puts the ex-smuggler boat ahead of mine in priority. STUPID law!

  • @user-uc8xb8lm5h
    @user-uc8xb8lm5h ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They should be ashamed of themselves of what a waste of money to build and tear down

  • @shelbynamels973
    @shelbynamels973 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is what you get when you make laws, and people find a way of (non)-complying.
    PS: Judge Sharon Gleason waived the $360 million dollar fined assessed by US Customs, but declared the shipping company non-compliant with the Jones Act. The train operation ceased and the tracks were removed.

    • @AtGnat8
      @AtGnat8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Just another company circumventing the law and never getting punished for it. What a useless judge.

    • @berrytharp1334
      @berrytharp1334 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@AtGnat8 They followed the letter of the law. The law should have been written better. I promise you the statute is voluminous enough to have not allowed this. They simply needed to add a few words.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AtGnat8 There is no such thing as 'circumventing' a law. You are either in compliance or in violation.

    • @koriko88
      @koriko88 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shelbynamels973Apparently not because people find all kinds of ways to technically comply with laws while violating the spirit of the law.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@koriko88 Perhaps. But all there is to go by are the words printed in the books.
      Law makers may have had an intent, but that is not what is on the page.

  • @mired914
    @mired914 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Very cool!

  • @nunyabusiness5275
    @nunyabusiness5275 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Absurd laws