Turkish ATMACA VS Italian OTOMAT Anti Ship Cruise Missile

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 99

  • @TankerRanger22
    @TankerRanger22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Atmaca is the best antiship missle in his class and NATO for now !

    • @yazidmobarak7182
      @yazidmobarak7182 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank God

    • @Šajze
      @Šajze 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok .

    • @achubxx8487
      @achubxx8487 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Šajze and what do your country make? nothing of weapons only talking big 😂😂 looks like you are serbian or croatian LOL..

  • @nathanruben3372
    @nathanruben3372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Atmaca is the newest missile in NATO. It has all the bells and whisles of the modern guided missiles. It has 250+ km range, exact potential is not disclosed.

  • @military_power
    @military_power 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    kullandığın program nedir arkadaşım
    el yazı animasyonu

  • @ogedayolcayto682
    @ogedayolcayto682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Turkish Hawk bites hard. Hold on enemies.

    • @defencelearning2785
      @defencelearning2785  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      👍

    • @polonez611
      @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@defencelearning2785 iranian "shaheed-161" vs bayraktar tb2
      Please

  • @williamjeremiah6637
    @williamjeremiah6637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Bravo Great Italy 🇮🇹 👏.

  • @hilmisahin4520
    @hilmisahin4520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    30 km menzil farkı hayat kurtarır 😉

    • @hakanisik14
      @hakanisik14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      250+ olmasi lazim bildigim kadari ile 280 diye biliyorum ben

    • @hilmisahin4520
      @hilmisahin4520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hakanisik14 evet olabilir tam bilmiyorum. Özellikle ktj motorundan sonra menzil arttı diye biliyorum.

    • @teyforeiz
      @teyforeiz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@hilmisahin4520 ktj motorlar daha takılmadı. Ama takıldığında 350 km ve üstüne çıkacak diye biliyorum.

  • @flyblu80
    @flyblu80 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    good Italians who in the 70s produced a defensive missile for the navy and the coasts. They are defense missiles. A French and Italian collaboration, the French provide the fundamental engine. The French have never been very interested in the missile but the electronics had two different final attack modes. The Italian side preferred a ground sea parallel attack missile, the French preferred a swoop attack on the ground. There was an idea of ​​providing new stealth specifications and improvements in the 1980s but the US preferred another missile Harpoon. What about the fairly recent Turkish missile, French engine TRI-40 and indigene KTJ-3200 good all’s.

  • @bilalbozkurt249
    @bilalbozkurt249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    MaşAllah Türkiyem 🇹🇷

  • @kentony7672
    @kentony7672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    US navy tested its air defense system with otomat and got penetrated,which left them shocked.

  • @sabahattinbey
    @sabahattinbey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Adam Türklerin bagını bulmuş bayrağı koyunca geliyoz ağaa
    bunu biri çevirsin yazsın uğraşamam şimdi uykum geldi

  • @Salah-qm5me
    @Salah-qm5me 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Price ?

  • @ekasaputra8036
    @ekasaputra8036 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤❤the best opsional ATMACA

  • @zleyici7250
    @zleyici7250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bizim medyadan daha iyi tanıtıyor valla helal olsun 👏👏🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @kirkloren8686
    @kirkloren8686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ATMACA 👍

  • @Alis-hq1xy
    @Alis-hq1xy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Atmaca 🇹🇷🇹🇷💪💪

  • @tounsi925
    @tounsi925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ATMACA got a longer range

  • @seferuzan3163
    @seferuzan3163 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷👏👏👏

  • @fatihalmirais3739
    @fatihalmirais3739 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TURKIYE💪👍

  • @flyblu80
    @flyblu80 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    for Turkish friends who read, Italy lost World War II and repudiates war. having said that, among the three forces, the naval force is the one with the most Italian prestige. This missile has been updated by mbda but it is not of much interest, but it is sufficient for the purpose. The defense of the Italian sea. Italy prefers defensive rather than offensive attitudes. Since the collapse of the Berlin Wall, something has begun to change, Italy participates in international missions. It seems that it is the idea of ​​arming our drones and developing or acquiring cruise missiles but there are no funds for the latter. To be put on submarines and frigate fremm. So a change, the drones are there but for reconnaissance and defense, the ships as well but for a defensive attitude, now the acquisition of the cruise weapon system 🚢 could change the vision.

    • @kentony7672
      @kentony7672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I heard Otomat shocked US Navy by penertrating their air defense system in a test,which means they detected it within a very short range and failed to intercept due to its terminal manuever ability.

  • @selamidundar4482
    @selamidundar4482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Atmaca super sea skimming ... atmaca's flight altitude < 3m

  • @korkutuk2584
    @korkutuk2584 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Obviously ATMACA is a better system.

  • @KingKing-sj1zi
    @KingKing-sj1zi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Turkey better

  • @Idk_what_name_to_put_
    @Idk_what_name_to_put_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the Atmaca is the best anti-ship missile,but the Italian navy is stronger,and then Italy after losing WW2 repudiates the war (repudiates it as an offensive means)

  • @failmehdiyev8229
    @failmehdiyev8229 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Atmacaa

  • @guneyh
    @guneyh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unmanned surface vehicle! That matters..

  • @newottomanempire5847
    @newottomanempire5847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ATMACA 400 km with new engine

  • @LoneWolf21672
    @LoneWolf21672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you compare BRAHMOS 🇮🇳🇷🇺 VS ATMACA 🇹🇷

    • @LoneWolf21672
      @LoneWolf21672 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @TURKİC HUN KHANETE what?

    • @ersa1991
      @ersa1991 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brahmos hisdistan ve rus yapımı sesten 2.8 kat daha hızlı menzili 300km avantajı hem menzili fazla hemde hızlı ama bu ona dezavantaj sağlıyor radarda kolaylıkla görülür atmaca denize yakın gidiyor ve tubojet kullanıyor bu ona avantaj sağlıyor radar da kolay görülmüyor

    • @mohammedazarudeen7944
      @mohammedazarudeen7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro , Brahmos is far superior, Atmaca is a subsonic missile, Brahmos is 3 time more faster

    • @LoneWolf21672
      @LoneWolf21672 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mohammedazarudeen7944 he also compared sheyna with orca torpedo. Orca is far superior than sheyna. Let's see their their reaction after comparing brahmos with atacama

    • @mohammedazarudeen7944
      @mohammedazarudeen7944 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LoneWolf21672 they won't, no no correct answer is" they can't "😎😎😎😎

  • @polonez611
    @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇮🇷Shaheed 129 vs anka s🇹🇷
    .

  • @tayfund5202
    @tayfund5202 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @otkancalik6397
    @otkancalik6397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @heyfitzpablum
    @heyfitzpablum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ATMACA has weak EW defense capability, it's not in the same class as EXOCET or HARPOON. It's guidance system is not as sophisticated, either. Outside of Turkey only Algeria has ordered ATMACA.

  • @doodleydoo
    @doodleydoo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Atmaca is much better.

  • @memduhciloglan6744
    @memduhciloglan6744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Meiyding Türkiye Atmaca

  • @floraafrin6330
    @floraafrin6330 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bangladesh should buy Atmaca anti ship cruise missile from Turkey.

  • @williamjeremiah6637
    @williamjeremiah6637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Italy Technology much higher than Turkey ,Italy is part of G7 .

    • @magnificentmoberley2333
      @magnificentmoberley2333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Developed on 1977 , no upgrade, case dismissed

    • @williamjeremiah6637
      @williamjeremiah6637 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@magnificentmoberley2333 it doesn't matter, even in Russia and America still using some old equipment and is working as a ex military expert I know what I am talking, case is not dismissed and continues.

    • @magnificentmoberley2333
      @magnificentmoberley2333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@williamjeremiah6637 well even you are so called “expert” you can not claim “Italian Superiority “ which is in history books and nonsense.By the way; are you the one who had been surprised within recent proxy wars with high tech Turkish military equipments? I can assure you , you’re going to have more surprises with 750 ongoing defence projects off Turkey, better learn some Turkish if you wanna gain some knowledge !

    • @titfortat5727
      @titfortat5727 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@magnificentmoberley2333 yes it as being many upgrades since the early otomat

    • @CriscCiaddu
      @CriscCiaddu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi @Magnificent Moberley
      What you said in your first comment is not correct.
      Italy has been producing OTOMAT since 1977 but we update them.
      The 1970s version was called OTOMAT mk.I(first generation cruise missile) with a range of 60km.
      Then we moved on to the OTOMAT mk.2 Block 1, Block 2 and Block 3.
      After we were developing the OTOMAT mk.3 Ulisse with the USA but the latter abandoned the project(but italy gained experience).
      So in the 90s we switched to the Teseo OTOMAT Mk.2 Block IV or also called OTOMAT Mk.2/A.
      Now we are switching to dual use OTOMAT mk.2 EVO or also called mk.2/E with more powerful electronic systems and range of 360km+(unspecified) for ASuW and 500km range tasks in deep strike mode.

  • @Kultiginkhan
    @Kultiginkhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🖕👍💪

  • @beyalbay8969
    @beyalbay8969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    😂 🇹🇷

  • @anarosmanov6536
    @anarosmanov6536 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷👍👍👍

  • @polonez611
    @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇮🇷Shaheed 129 vs anka s🇹🇷
    .

  • @polonez611
    @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇮🇷Shaheed 129 vs anka s🇹🇷
    .

    • @defencelearning2785
      @defencelearning2785  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait for tomorrow

    • @polonez611
      @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@defencelearning2785 bro, where are u from ?

  • @polonez611
    @polonez611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇮🇷Shaheed 129 vs anka s🇹🇷
    .