Karna was EVIL not बेचारा, BR Chopra's Mahabharat is wrong | Ami Ganatra
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Clip from संवाद # 15 with Ami Ganatra. Full video link: • संवाद # 15: Ami Ganatr...
Ami Ganatra is an alumna of Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIMA). A management professional, she is also a devout yoga practitioner, a certified yoga instructor, and a student of Sanskrit and Indian knowledge systems.
Iam so sad that people don't read Mahabharat and compare Karn with Arjun. There was nobody like Arjun and here Iam not saying about warriorship but as a whole personality. He is ardhnarayan himself
Kalyug hai bhai. Krishna ji ne kaha tha ki kalyug mai log asli dharm ko bhool jayenge
BR Mahabharata and other tv serials glorified Karna but in Vyas Mahabharata he was different.
यह तो देवी जी बड़ी ही शालीनता से यह बता रही हैं कि कर्ण कोई मुख्य भाग नही हैं महाभारत का । ऐसा भी कहने वाले अपने आप को बहुत ही ज्ञानी समझते हैं जब किसी इतिहासकार से पाला पड़ता हैं तो छूमंतर हो जाते हैं ।
mrutyunjay aur karnayan padh le samaj mein ayega karna kon thaa..
कर्न ने मित्र धर्म निभाने के लिए अधर्म का सात दिया और धर्म स्थापना करने के लिए स्वयं के प्राण अर्पण कर दिए .जिस माँ ने उसका त्याग कर दिया उनकी 5 पुत्रों को जीवित रखने के लिए स्वंय के प्राणों का दान किया.
Some brainwashed people think she is defaming Karna 😂 people please read Mahabharat and stop watching these fake TV serials.
Aapne padhi to ek debate ho jaye
Chalo Bhai source batao 😂😂
Yes u need this stop watching sonyputra
Ye defame hi kar Rahi hay ... Isko Ghanta kuch ni pata hay Karn ke bare may ... TV serial ka chodo ... Jo bolte hain na KARN acha ni tha ... Then prove it ... Kahan pe likha hay ...
Ek mic pakad ke sab apne appko vidwaan Maan lete hain ...
Abbe tum log Jo ake comments karte ho ?? Sach batao kabhi MAHABHARAT jesi MAHAPURAN ka Front page bhi dekha hay???
*_Half knowledge is always dangerous than no knowledge_* -
Knowledge is important ❌
Only Right Education is important ✅
Lets debate over karna if you think you have full knowledge..
@@Divine.mystical leta do
Yes. That's what happened in Abhimanyu's case.........
@@shikhasidney844 karn killed abhimamyu, not tortured him like others because he knew that he is Arjun son, Abhimanyu karn ka putra samaan hai, Duryodhan just want to just want to torture him thats the entire idea of chakravyuh. Karn gave him the peace by killing foremost
@@sganesh2958 Please don't believe in TV serials. Please read the granth. Karna, after running away from Abhimanyu twice in the Chakravyuha, ganged up on the boy and unfairly destroyed his weapons, armor, chariot and killed his charioteer. When Abhimanyu picked up a sword and a shield, they were also destroyed.
This was agreed to be a gross rejection of dharma by everyone else including Sri Hari.
Karna shows us the mirror....what most of us are in our lives... The learning here is to recognize such behavior in ourselves....
Well said.
😅kuch bhi? Karna was a castiest himself
Bhai aa gye padh kr 😂 an btao 2months m kuchh mila krna ke bare m btane yogya baate 😂 pahle serials dekh kr apni mansikta bna lo fir yha aa kr gandagi failao. Tell me one thing brother jisse m arjun ko hate kre bas ek chij bta de 🙏
People are so busy in judging karn was villain.. but not understanding his emotions turbulence..anyway it is upto them..onething I observed here is if you have all in your life that is birth status, caste status, money status they think that arjun was great..if they dont have all of that they feel like karn was great..
At the end they are forcing us judgemental and take stand who was right and who was wrong , if every one is good on earth how do you differentiate good and bad.
but krishna himself told that don't judge anyone in mahabharat but understand and adopt good deeds of it.now a days more intellectuals are becoming judges In youtubes..
@megha977 so him disrespecting women is okay? If tomorrow a child tapist says I have emotional trauma, that's why I did this with child, will it be okay?
Who's after the Kalki movie...
This was not kalki movie but Sonyputra karn in kaliyug movie
@@ItsVivi2007 same here bro this is kaliyug yaha villains ka jay jaykar hota h
I think this woman is presenting a very simplistic understanding of the characters of Mahabharata
@@ItsVivi2007 yes but the whole point of Mahabharata is to portray "dharmsankat" ie an issue where it's hard to tell what is the right thing and what is the wrong thing. In this podcast she never comes around to explaining why Yudhishthir is not to be judged negatively for literally gambling away his wife at the same time she's quick to paint Karna as an absolute villain
@@ItsVivi2007 is not on karna .... time laga but kalki hi lead karega
Karna wasn't Over Glorified in Dwapar Yugaa, but he is Over Glorified now, as today's people have much more deep understanding and wisdom of Karna's character than Dwapar Yugaa's - peoples, rishi-munis, brahmins, warriors like Drona and Bheeshma and Gods like Krishna and Hanuman etc. who always stood by the side of Pandavas🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.
I am seriously not getting this- How KARNA FANS have such a grave and profoundly deep understanding of someone’s character, far better than Lord Krishna?
Karan ye he ki sab khud ko Karn me dekhte he
@@someshwari_debi Then I should be on top of that list of those people due to my life conditions, but that's cheapness, because Hindu Dharma never support victimhoodness, rather one should always trying to be better person than blaming the society or destiny for his adversaries, and that's what real hero's nature is - which Arjuna had, that's why Shri krishna supported him. The irony is that Shri krishna himself had faced much suffering and hardships in his life, who would he complain to???
There is another term for victimhoodness - "Emotional Fool".
One of the core fundamentals of Bhagwat- Geeta teaches us how to be an Emotional Intelligent by standing and facing difficulties in any kind of adverse conditions, if they arrive, BUT SHOULD NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT IT (which Karna used to tell the most). That's what Shri krishna always used to teach Arjuna and other Pandavas. This fact is hard to digest for many people, but that's what makes a man a real hero.
@@gopalverma1689 Nahi bhai nahi chalaataa..
@@gopalverma1689 ...
sacred-texts.com/hin/maha/index.htm
logicastra.blogspot.com/2017/02/proof-that-bhima-conquered-karnas-anga.html?m=1
Bro I personally feel karn as more inspiring than any character...I accept he has done mistakes but jst think..the major mistake was kunti,s why did she not tell the truth tht karn was her son in the right moment..due to her he had to face lot of difficulty..when karn was in difficulty only duryodhan helped him so karn helped duryodhan and faught frm his side ..whts wrong in tht..on top of tht karn was a most cursed character and had to face lot of difficulty throughout his life.. becoming a warrior with so much problems is not easy..arjun had everything.. krishna was on his side ..he got all the education.. everything..so him being powerful is not tht big deal..karn inspite of so much obstacles faught arjuna and almost defeated him.. once krishna saved arjuna frm his one arrow..I beleive in reality karn was so much powerful than arjun but his curses made him weak..on top of tht karn was a biggest dhani..he even gave his kavach and kundal to Indra ..why wouldn't u love such character
Most people have not read the Texts, only serials.
Majority comments here are from ignorants who have not read a word of the Mahabharat.
- Both Krishna and Karna were set adrift in the river after birth. Krishna grew up in a simple, poor household, with a loving family but also lived in a perennial shadow of death from Kamsa. Krishna grew up as the most lovable child, whose childhood antics we fondly worship till this day. He realized his own self as Virat Vishwa Roopi Yogeshwar Paramatma at a young age, and yet despite all his powers remained the most humble and down to earth human being, who we worship today.
- Karna, on the other hand, grew up in semi royalty. His foster father Adirath was not any commoner, and most definitely not poor or vulnerable. Adirath was a powerful figure in the Kuru kingdom, a close confidante of King Dhritirashtra. A Sarathi was equivalent of a modern ship or aircraft captain. Adirath was himself a Kshatriya and a descendent of the royal family of Anga, which is also why Duryodhan later crowned Karna as the king of Anga. Despite growing up in royalty, Karna was full of arrogance and jealousy.
- In terms of age, Karna was older than all other Kauravas and Pandavas, and much older than little Arjun, who was far younger to him. Yet Karna always felt jealous of Arjun. Imagine in today's times when a 18 year old tries all dirty tricks over a 8 year old. Such a person would rightly be called a Bully.
Karna's skills as an archer are highly overrated by ignorant modern commentators.
- The most powerful warriors at Kurukshetra were Bheem, Arjun, Satyaki followed by Dhrishtadyumna, Abhimanyu. Even Yudhishthira, Nakul and Sahadeva were great warriors. On the Kaurava side it was Bheeshma, Drona, Ashwatthama, Shalya, Duryodhan and Kripacharya. Here too we see how vile and arrogant Karna was. He sulked when Bheeshma became the commander of the Kuru army instead of him. Bheeshma himself knew how vile Karna was and did not accord any importance to Karna. Karna entered the battle only on the 11th day after Bheeshma fell.
- Forget Arjun, who was far more powerful than Karna, Karna was not even a match for young Abhimanyu. Karna was one amongst many who ambushed and killed poor Abhimanyu in the chakravyuha. If Karna was so powerful why could he not defeat Abhimanyu one on one? Why was he part of the ambush? This was the turning point of the war. From this point on, Krishna removed all shackles from Bheem and Arjun, and they finished the war within 5 days.
- Modern commentators also wrongly think that Krishna pleaded with Karna before the war to save Arjun. Krishna only gave a last chance to Karna to salvage himself out of respect for Kunti. Krishna always knew how vile Karna was. There was not even a chance of Krishna thinking Karna was better than Arjun. Krishna knew that Karna's arrogance would lead him to his own end.
- When Karna's end came, Krishna's message to Arjun was that this vile character deserves no mercy. He is the one who insulted Draupadi on multiple occassions, who continuously coaxed Duryodhan into this war, who mercilessly ambushed and killed Abhimanyu. This is why Arjun finally slayed Karna.
@@anjaneyamarut868 oh shut up brihuchod. 🤣🤣
@@anjaneyamarut868 oh get lost arjun got his ass ripped by robbers in dwarika and abhimanyu was beaten in multiple group attacks.
@@anjaneyamarut868 i like how your bori ce ended and starplus started in the end of your comment.
Sister has personal issues with karna😂
Book bechni hai na, controversy to chaiye hi😂
Kalyug hai didi yaha sab Aisa hi hota hai 😂
Why do you think she has personal issues with Karna?
Yess she hates him bcz he called a whore as a whore 😂😂
Oh. Looks like you have personal issues with original Mahabharata written by vedavyasa
Karna was not so noble.
Karna was hand in glove with Duryodhan for insulting Droupadi and accused her by calling her "immoral" at the time of vastrapaharan.
@@nageswarasastry6150 tab unlogoko kya kehte hai jab unkey patni ka vastra nikalthey samay kuch nahi kiya, Galat karne valo se us galti ko na rokha bahut bada aparaadi hey usko kya bolenge aap. Ha karn galat kiya woh usko bhi pata hai, wohi krishna ko bola tha ki kaun kaun wus sabha mey anyay mei hei un sabhi ka dand nischay.
@@sganesh2958bewakuf saare unke Duryodhan k slave ban gaye the after losing.
Slave k saath aisa vyavhar bhi galat hai. Koi daasi hai matlab uske vastra utaro?
Koi rokega nahi toh yeh kaam sahi ho gaya?
Dimag hai tum log ka k doosre ki galati ko use karte ho to justify 1 bahut badi galti?
Bhagwan khud Pandav k saath the isliye! Dimag se paidal tumlog serial dekh k Karan, Duryodhan ko defend karne lage ho
@@RP-qs1tp wah bhai wah jab pandavo ka galtiya hai tho apko defend karney keliya sab kuch sahi hai woh daasi hai tho kya woh maanav hi hai na Aadmi hi hai na, koyi bhi Aadmi uska Aurat par yesa khaam khartha hai tho kamush koyi nahi hoga konsi paristhidi bhi ho daasi bi ho ya na, Aur kya bola bhagwan unkey saath hai ganta saath tha woh sirf draupadi ko raksha kiya kyunki draupadi ka saath anyay hua jo bhi pandav ka saath hua woh unka karm ka phal hai.
Tum jaise log bahut biased and partial hotey hai jab pandav ka bhi galti hai tho aap mantey nahi kuch bhi bakwas reason boldheye justify karney keliye. Mere pandav sa koyi nafrat ya dushman nahi hai mera favourite yudhishthir hai, Mai uska galatiya manjoor sachayi bhi manjoor.
Vaisey hi karn mai bhi achi hai aur burai, tum. Kya dhekna chahte ho usme hi tumhara jeevan ka dhekney ka nateeja hota, Aur kisi wor character ko hype karney keliye kisi aur ka character ka assasination karna bur hai
@@sganesh2958 khamoshi is the kamzori from situation. Uska matlab yeh nahi k koi takatvar kuch bhi kare. I think you have lost all common sense.
According to you British were right to rule us because we allowed it
Karn was a good man
Karna was a "token". This word can explain him a lot. He was neither good nor bad but simply a token or became a token due to Duryodhan offering him a small village to rule to make him a raj instead of sur-putra. Thus he became a token and acted accordingly.
Esa nhi h bhai, ye false narrative hai.... Sutputra was not any low position.. He was a very well respected & powerful person even before becoming king..
@@Vvk11vv1 "Shayla's initial response to Duryodhan when he was asked to be Karna's charioteer. "Knowing me, O monarch, to be so capable, of afflicting the foe, why dost thou appoint me to the office of driver in battle for such a low-born person as Adhiratha's son? It behoveth thee not, O king of kings, to set me to such mean tasks! Being so superior, I cannot make up my mind to obey the commands of a sinful person. He that causeth a superior person arrived of his own will and obedient from love, to yield to a sinful wight, certainly incurreth the sin of confusing the superior with the inferior. Brahman created the brahmanas from his mouth, and the kshatriyas from his arms. He created the Vaishyas from his thighs and the Shudras from his feet. In consequence of the intermixture of those four orders, O Bharata, from those four have sprung particular classes, viz., those born of men of superior classes wedding women of classes inferior to themselves, and vice versa. The kshatriyas have been described to be protectors (of the other classes) acquirers of wealth and givers of the same. The brahmanas have been established on the Earth for the sake of favouring its people by assisting at sacrifices, by teaching and acceptance of pure gifts. Agriculture and tending of cattle and gift are the occupations of the Vaishyas according to the scriptures. Shudras have been ordained to be the servants of the brahmanas, the kshatriyas, and the vaishyas. Similarly, the Sutas are the servants of kshatriyas, and not latter the servants of the former. Listen to these my words, O sinless one. As regards myself, I am one whose coronal locks have undergone the sacred bath. I am born in a race of royal sages. I am reckoned a great car-warrior. I deserve the worship and the praises that bards and eulogists render and sing. Being all this, O slayer of hostile troops, I cannot go to the extent of acting as the driver of the Suta's son in battle. I will never fight, undergoing an act of humiliation. "-- he considers it an act of humiliation to be the charioteer of a low-born Karna. What are you talking about.
Well for just information
The small village that you're talking about is not small as this village is called as karnal now the city where i am from and there are 144 villages that come under karnal
So its not a small village but quite a big land
@Miracle-gs8q bas itna? Ye tho bahut chotta hai.
When Lord Krishna has praised Karna in many occasions, we should not listen others. If Karna was so bad, after his death how he got place in Swarg?
Duryodhan also went to heaven, what are you smoking?
@@paxonite-7bd5 And what about the part where he was praised many times by the Lord himself?
PLEASE READ GRANTHAS
@@paxonite-7bd5 if you have read Mahabharat, then you haven't understood it's message. It's marma
Bro, you saw Karn in swarg? You were gardening there?
Lord ram and krishna fought against adharm and now people are idolizing them is such a shame
😂😂😂 aur aaj kal k non readers be like Karn hara nhi haraya gya tha😂😂😂
He was on side of adharma obviously he will lose...also Arjun was the greatest ever warrior accept it
Karana haraya hi gya tha be
@@learnforsurvival1208ye bewkuf ko kya pata😂
@@AmanKumar-dc4iybhai me itna hi bolunga ki me Mahabharata padh chuka hu or ye jhoot bhi nahi bol rhi or purn sach bhi nahi hai half knowledge hai bhai
agreed he was on adharm side.....khudka dimaag use kar na sri krishna the arjuna ke side aur jaake puran padh sri krishna mentioned the warrior infront of you arjun isnt a normal warrior
@@AmanKumar-dc4iy sabse bada bewkuf toh tum log ho jo yudhistir ko mahatma bolta he jo juwa khelta he
ARJUNA in kurukchetra - Guided by God, loved by enemys like PITAHMAH and DRONACHARIYA, with his Gandiv, with Agni Dev's chariot, protected by HANUMAN
KARNA in kurukchetra - Guided by enemy's uncle, hated by his own team members, without his Kavach🛡 coursed by PARSURAM, coursed by DHARTI MATA, he promised to KUNTI that he never kill PANDAV.
still killed by cheating👏👏👏👏👏.
Karna was good personality. In whole mahabhart he has done only one mistake in draupadi vatastrharan by not protecting a Lady in a royal court where only there were men. Same crime done by everyone who didn't not oppose including pandavas . Due to this crime every one's life became hell. Either they killed or live whole life in grief. While karna three setbacks first he live life in sorrow second killed third get nothing.
Reason that he wanted to marry Draupadi but failed. So his responsibity increased to protect her.
In whole mahabaht every one guided by their elders .only karna was not guided by any one.
But overall he was noble warrior with good heart. We salute him
Karna was not evil Son of Lord Surya and Kunti but only thing make him wrong is his accompaniment
Bhai padhlo kamse kam!!! Ye sab bakwas to nhi kroge!!
😅
@@adarshkulkarni182 DRON-VADH PARVA CHAPTER 1132(155) BORI CE©
Gita-press Mahabharat 180 ghatotkachaparv
"ब्राह्मण्य : सत्यवादी च तपस्वी नियतब्रत
रिपुष्यपि दयावंशाच्य तत्मात् कणों बृशः स्मृतः " ।। २४ ।।
• meaning : -
" कर्ण ब्राह्मण भक्त, सत्यवादी , तपस्वी , नियम और व्रत का पालक तथा शत्रुयो पर भी दया करने वाला है ; इसीलिए उसे बृशः ( धर्मात्मा ) कहा गया है " ।। २४ ।।
*• He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha*
Calling a queen veshya is itself a evil act during dwapar yuga..
@@Divine.mysticalas Sikh i read Mahabharata by Ved vyas and yes karna was not good but Pandavas were worse... Karna was treated ill due to discrimination that's also a fact and he was rejected by Draupadi by calling sutputra.. also Pandavas lusted for draupadi hence Kunti ordered them to marry her so that no fight happens between brothers. I seriously don't find any morale good amongst Pandava and even kauvaras
एक वाक्य है। मेरे पास जो मे अक्सर सुनता हूं और अपने मित्रो को बताता हू की । "नंदलाल तेरी ढाल साथ अंजनिये थे नियति कठोर थी जो दोनो वंदनीय थे। " आशा करता हूं कि इससे आपको असली महाभारत का ज्ञान हो गा।।।। जय श्री कृष्ण 🚩
I have read comments like “Arjun was nothing without Sri Krishna. Karna was the greatest. Jai ho karna”
Very simple question.
Why didn't Maa Kunti reveal that Karna was her eldest son?
War wouldn't have happened.
Bro never quesfion mythologies things happen for the storys purpose
You're asking this because you had the advantage of hindsight. Kunti mata never foresaw a disastrous war as a consequence of her silence. The first time she saw Karna after leaving him in the river was when he was displaying his skills, and she fainted. After that all she knew was he became a king and was living a great life. Why would she tarnish her and her family's reputation when all seemed well?
Those who valourize Karna have only a half baked understanding of Mahabharata. Karna is an extremely complicated character (which requires a lot of time and maturity to decipher) and Ved Vyas uses him very intelligently in the epic.
And u have put in full time and effort?
@@Wisdom_heritage I have , he was the real hero of mahabharat
@@vivekpadman5248 exactly. Even after krishna himself giving karna the highest admiration, these wanna be in spotlight freaks keep trying to come up with something
@@Wisdom_heritage bro sometimes I feel these arjun Bhakta are like muslims, very blind
@@vivekpadman5248- real hero of mahabharat my ass 😂😂😂
Karn andhbhakts are so funny 😂😂
my understanding of all characters in Mahabharat is that they are all grey no one is completely white or completely black, some have more white some have more black
A question: Why dronacharya ask eklavya his thumb? ask this question and you can imagine each one individually?
I thought drona was wrong there but amogh lila prabhu gave another perspective which might not be true but made sense.
Watch his video.
Dronacharya asks for eklavya thumb not because of Arjun but because of different reason
Eklavya was the son of general commander of magadha and was definitely gonna become next commander
At that time magadha and hastinapur were enemies
So if he taught eklavya and then his teaching would be used against hastinapur and that would be deshdroh
It sounds unfair to some but to dronacharya who was very loyal towards hastinapur it was the only way
@MidNightChill-xn7zm it was not a possibility
Magadha has always been a volatile kingdom
It's almost like India sending a weapon to Pakistan
There may not be a war but it's just a hopeful possibility
It may seem drona wronged eklavya (which he at certain level did) but it was definitely for greater good
@MidNightChill-xn7zmand again eklavya wasn't threat to drona but to whole hastinapur
He did it coz dornarcharya was loyal to hastinapur and eklavya was the commander of his enemies "magadha"
Before reading Mahabharata i was same like "KARNA KE SAATH ANYAAY HUA H😂" now i kn he was the bone of contention 😅
आखिर, बोले भगवान् सभी को देख व्याकुल हताश ।
'अर्जुन ! देखो, किस तरह कर्ण सारी सेना पर टूट रहा,
किस तरह पाण्डवों का पौरुष होकर अशङक वह लूट रहा ।
देखो जिस तरफ़, उधर उसके ही बाण दिखायी पडते हैं,
बस, जिधर सुनो, केवल उसके हुङकार सुनायी पडते हैं ।'
'कैसी करालता ! क्या लाघव ! कितना पौरुष ! कैसा प्रहार !
किस गौरव से यह वीर द्विरद कर रहा समर-वन में विहार !
व्यूहों पर व्यूह फटे जाते, संग्राम उजडता जाता है,
ऐसी तो नहीं कमल वन में भी कुञ्जर धूम मचाता है ।'
'इस पुरुष-सिंह का समर देख मेरे तो हुए निहाल नयन,
कुछ बुरा न मानो, कहता हूं, मैं आज एक चिर-गूढ वचन ।
कर्ण के साथ तेरा बल भी मैं खूब जानता आया हूं,
मन-ही-मन तुझसे बडा वीर, पर इसे मानता आया हूं ।'
औ' देख चरम वीरता आज तो यही सोचता हूं मन में,
है भी कोई, जो जीत सके, इस अतुल धनुर्धर को रण में ?
मैं चक्र सुदर्शन धरूं और गाण्डीव अगर तू तानेगा,
तब भी, शायद ही, आज कर्ण आतङक हमारा
Karna was a rakshash in his past life, belongs to rakshas community. he was supposed to be killed by nar and Narayan i.e Arjun and Srikrishna. In previous birth he was blessed with a boon ,he misused the boon then it was decided as he was a very powerful warrior of valour,he would be killed by the 100th arrow of Nar& Narayan after demonstrating his valour so that he dies with respect but cunningly he escaped the last arrow. That was the arrow which beheaded him in Mahabharat and he got mukti from rakshas kul. His jealousy, pride killed him.
Yeto iscon ki bakchodi hai Mahabharata kahi bhi nahi likha esa
@@tattvamasi2852 ok tab Arjun ka kya tha uska pehle janam, yudisthir ka bheem ka nakul sahadev ka sya yea sabhi log bhi devon ka Amsh they, yea kabhi bhi nahi bolenge aur kahi bhi nahi hoga kyunki koyi bhi lika nahi, just character assasination karney kelliye kuch bhi kichidi pakakey boldhetey, sirf karn ka pehle janam pata tha dusro ka nahi
@@sganesh2958 sahi kaha bhai character assassination ke liye kehte hai ki veshya bhi bola tha kaha hai proof ye sab aaj kal ke translations hai
Actually to sage ved vyasa ji agar koi aisi epic likhenge jisme ek Vishnu ji ke avtar ka bhi part hai to wo wahi side likhenge jo ki jeeta ho to yudh pandava jeete
Aur sage ved vyasa ji pandava aur Kauravas
Dono ke dada ji the
Fir harivamsa bhi unhi ke dwara rachit ek
text hai jisme unne Sri Krishna ke bare me
likha hai
Ho sakta hai ye poori Mahabharata Pandav ke prospective se likhi gyi ho jo ki jeevit the aur other side ka koi bacha hi nhi tha apni kahi batane
This was made up by ISKON, nar and Narayan were Maharishi so they never engaged in any war
I Cannot completely agree with this respectful lady.
1.Imagine someone who is a son of Surya Dev, then for a person of such vibrant energy, being called Suta is derogatory.
He may not know he is a Surya Putra. But he definitely has and can feel that vibrant energy and temper inside of him.
2.If Suta is not a derogatory remark compared to Kshatriya, then why Kripacharya stops Karna from competing against Kshatriya Arjun in the Rangamahal.
2b. If being Suta is not less than being a Kshatriya, then why Draupadi rejects Karna giving the narrative that he was a Sutaputra and not a Kshatriya.
2c. If Suta is not a lower class compared to Kshatriya, then why Drupad tells Duryodhana and Angaraj Karna that they should have known the rules of Swayamvar and Karna should not have participated in the first place becoz he was Sutaputra.
What do you mean when you say he gave away his kawach and kundal and got Shakti Astra in return?? So far I know, he just gave his kawach & kundal becoz he was asked to do so when he couldn't deny and received Shakti Astra as a gift. It was not an exchange offer like you are trying to portray.
3. It is said that after being killed Mahabharata, Karna achieves a position higher than anyone else in after life. Does that mean that the devine entity that awarded Karna this position was less knowledgeable and had a poor sense of justice compared to Miss Ganatra.
4. Krishna himself has praised Karna in Kurukshetra compared to Arjun during Arjun-Karna duel. Does that mean Miss Ganatra's interpretation is better than Krishna himself.
Sorry Madam, but such remarks against Karna in your podcasts and books will definitely benefit the views and sales. However, it is difficult to believe that Karna was a bad guy like you wish to portray.
Well said
1. Sutaputra is the child born to Brahman stree and Kshatriya mard according to Manusmriti. As both Brahmin and Kshatriya are considered so called high caste suta can’t be a very low caste in the hierarchy. If calling a suryaputra as Sutaputra is derogatory then shldnt it be the same level derogatory for calling vayuputra or indraputra as just a mere Kshatriya?
2. The rangmahal was meant for only the Kuru princes to exhibit their skills. Kripacharya for a lack of reasons chose that reason because he did not want the rangmahal to become a ranbhoomi. He’s well aware of the enemity between Kauravas and Pandavas. Now if a third person comes around challenging a Pandava, the Kauravas would definitely side with this new person and a fight will break out between the kuru princes at that moment itself. He tried to avoid the situation (not the best way, I agree)
2b. I feel it was her choice if she wanted to marry only a Kshatriya and doesn’t want to marry anybody outside that community. Suppose I’m a vaishya and I do not wish to marry a Brahmin or a Kshatriya or a suta then I think that’s my choice and I have the right to voice it when my marriage is being discussed in public.
2c. Maybe she didn’t want to marry anybody other than a Kshatriya or a Brahmin and hence invitations were sent out only to people of those communities 🤷♂️
3. I’m not sure if this is mentioned in BORI critical edition or Geeta press so I won’t comment on this.
4. The same Krishna also condemns the adharmas that Karna has done… (Abhimanyu’s death sequence, calling Draupadi vesya and suggesting vastrapaharan)
At the end of the day it’s not about good guy bad guy. It depends upon your actions and choices in certain testing situations. It is always easy to blame situations and play victim card. But in the end what matters is your choices and actions.
Hypothetical situation: let’s say yes Karna’s actions are all justified because he was forced into sad situations and was humiliated multiple times. Dhritarashtra was born blind and was humiliated for that. He was not made king even though he was the older one and Pandu became king. He was wronged here. So does it give him the right to call Kunti and madri names? Yes he definitely had that option. Did he choose to do so? No. He accepted his fate.
Bheem was poisoned. Did he poison Duryodhana in return? No. The Pandavas were plotted to be burnt alive in Laxyagarh. Luckily they escaped. Did they try to burn down Duryodhan? No.
So at the end of the it’s the choices that matter. Karna is a great warrior but his sad choices brought about his destruction. Is there something that we can learn from his life and do differently? Yes.
Dear friend, so you've watched the 2013 Mahabharat of Star Plus;
Do you exactly know that whatever you're saying is truly correct and happened years ago.
@@IamRajS if your message is directed at me then let me tell you yes I’ve watched both BR Chopra’s Mahabharat and Star Plus Mahabharat.
Do ik what happened years ago? No I don’t. My references are Geeta Press Mahabharat and BORI’s Mahabharata which are considered to be closest to the original Vyas Rachit Mahabharat. And also a little logical reasoning from plots in the story based on my understanding.
@@vishwaajithpemmasani1198 it was for the person who wrote the first comment as the facts stated by him/her are more similar to 2013 Mahabharat
Jo log karn ko pure evil/kayar /baleen kahte hain ye lo sabut
Aagaye padh ke Mahabharata 😂😂😂
Here are some lines from Vyasa's *Mahabharata* that highlight Karna's power and abilities, presented in Sanskrit along with Hindi translations.
### 1. **कर्ण की युद्ध कौशल और शक्ति:**
**महाभारत, भीष्म पर्व, अध्याय 4, श्लोक 3-4:**
**संस्कृत:**
```
कर्णोऽस्त्रेषु महाविद्वान् कृतास्त्र: सुतप: स्वयम्।
महेष्वासो महावीर्य: साक्षादिव हुताशन:॥ 3॥
न नूनं सत्त्वमस्यास्ति योऽस्य वीर्यमधीशयेत्।
न हि शक्तो रणे वायुरप्येनं सहसा हि॥ 4॥
```
**हिन्दी अनुवाद:**
"कर्ण अस्त्र-विद्या में महान विद्वान, तपस्या करके स्वयं दिव्य अस्त्र प्राप्त करने वाला, महान धनुर्धर और महावीर्यवान हैं, जैसे साक्षात अग्नि।"
"निस्संदेह ऐसा कोई नहीं है जो उनकी वीरता को चुनौती दे सके। युद्ध में वायु भी उन्हें तुरंत पराजित नहीं कर सकता।"
### 2. **कर्ण का दानशीलता:**
**महाभारत, वन पर्व, अध्याय 297, श्लोक 22-25:**
**संस्कृत:**
```
यस्य याच्ञां न विज्ञाय ददाति किल सुव्रत:।
कवचेन्द्रियुगं देवं तत्सर्वं साक्षिपुत्रवत्॥ 22॥
स वै विवसन: कर्णो याचितस्तेन धर्मवित्।
कवचं परमं दिव्यं वृत्तसारमहाव्रती॥ 23॥
स दत्त्वा तु तत: साक्षात्कवचं पार्थिवर्षभ:।
ददौ सुमहत: तस्य वृत्तं च न शशाक ताम्॥ 24॥
इन्द्राय च स वीरत्वात्प्रदाय कवचं पुन:।
अतुल्यं द्वादशस्यान्यं गतवांस्तस्य तेजसा॥ 25॥
```
**हिन्दी अनुवाद:**
"वह महाव्रती कर्ण, जो किसी की याचना को बिना सोचे-समझे कभी मना नहीं करता, इन्द्र द्वारा माँगे जाने पर अपने दिव्य कवच और कुंडल को भी दान में दे देता है।"
"कर्ण ने अपने दिव्य कवच को इन्द्र को दान में दिया, जिससे वह स्वयं की रक्षा के लिए बनाया गया था। इस तरह कर्ण ने अपनी दानशीलता का परिचय दिया और अत्यधिक तेज प्राप्त किया।"
### 3. **कर्ण का शक्ति और पराक्रम:**
**महाभारत, कर्ण पर्व, अध्याय 91, श्लोक 1-3:**
**संस्कृत:**
```
कर्णोऽपि धनुरादाय तिष्ठत्त्वरितविक्रम:।
दुर्योधनस्य सैन्यानि द्रावयामास पाण्डवात्॥ 1॥
स वै रथेन महता धवजेन च बृंहित:।
संजघान रणे शत्रून् सायकै: कनकच्छदै:॥ 2॥
न तत्र कश्चित् प्रत्यासीद्धि सन्नद्धं सुतमर्षिण:।
सर्वेषां हि बलं कर्ण: पाण्डवेषु व्ययोजयत्॥ 3॥
```
**हिन्दी अनुवाद:**
"कर्ण ने धनुष उठाकर युद्ध में त्वरित गति से खड़ा हुआ और दुर्योधन की सेना को पांडवों से बचाने लगा।"
"वह विशाल रथ और ध्वज के साथ, स्वर्ण आवरण से सुसज्जित बाणों से शत्रुओं को युद्ध में मारने लगा।"
"उस समय, कर्ण की शक्ति के सामने कोई भी शत्रु खड़ा नहीं हो सका, क्योंकि कर्ण ने पांडवों के विरुद्ध सभी की शक्ति को व्यर्थ कर दिया।"
### 4. **कर्ण का दिव्यास्त्र:**
**महाभारत, द्रोण पर्व, अध्याय 87, श्लोक 20:**
**संस्कृत:**
```
ततो दिव्यास्त्रमादाय कर्णो युद्धविनोदय:।
मुमोचास्त्रं महावेगं कृतवर्मा विनिह्नुवन्॥ 20॥
```
**हिन्दी अनुवाद:**
"तब कर्ण, युद्ध में आनंद लेने वाला, दिव्य अस्त्र का प्रयोग करते हुए, महान वेग से एक महाशक्तिशाली अस्त्र छोड़ता है, जो कृतवर्मा को ढंक देता है।"
इन उदाहरणों से स्पष्ट होता है कि कर्ण की शक्ति, पराक्रम, दानशीलता और अस्त्र-विद्या में निपुणता, महाभारत में विस्तृत रूप से वर्णित हैं।
@@ItsVivi2007 bhai khulla bol Raha houn chatgpt se likha houn
@@ItsVivi2007 ek chizz bta bhai aap kiske side ho debate mein
Aur aapne kaha se copy paste kiya ye dialect kisi manus ka toh ho ni shakta thoda aur mahnat kar slok bhi paste kr dete evidence toh hota etne bade paragraph ka lag ra man se thok ra hai parv likh ke woh chatgpt se copy paste kr ke
Mere mein toh slok bhi tha chapter, parv translation meaning (pure evidence)
Bolne se kuchh ni hota meine toh Mahabharata padhi duniyaa ki sabse badi poem ab vishwas kaise dilau koi toh Mahabharata padhe ga ni karta houn jisse sabse jyada fan hai karna ki beizzati kr dete hai viral bhi honge debate bhi chalegi bs khatma
@@SheelaBhardwaj-rl6cw bhai bolne hi ja ra tha gpt se likha hai par aapne khudi bta diya
Mujhe bhi gussa aata hai jab karn ko kuch log defame krte hai aur bolte hai
Ye wo log hai jo Sonyputra dekh ke aae hai
Maine bhi gpt se try karke nikale the
Aise shloka aur translation par ek cheez hai yahi shloka aap wapas uspe copy paste karke poochoge aur likhoge is it exactly from Mahabharata by ved vyasa
To wo doubt dikha dega
Maine to ye bhi notice Kiya ki actually me ved vyasa ji jo the wo pandava aur Kauravas ke dada ji ab koi bhi jab kuch kahani likhega to usi pe likhega jo Jeet gya hoga
Aur sabse badi cheez to ye hai ki pandava devtao se prapt putra the to jahir si baat hai bakiyo se ache to honge but karna bhi to Surya Dev ka Putra tha
Sarvashrest dhanurdhari keh dete hai Arjun ko but back story kya hai jab seekhne hi nhi diya jaega to kaise koi Arjun se acha ho jaega
Dronacharya ji ne Arjun ko wada kiya tha ki wo Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari banaenge to jab unko pta lga ekluvya Bina unki siksha ke unki pratima bna kr Arjun se aage nikal ra tha to uska anghutha maang liya
acha hua karn ne aage ki sikhsa parshuram ji se le li warna wo karn se uska jeevan maang lete aur wo de deta kyuki danveer karn se unke guru kya koi bhi kuch mangta tha to wo use Khali nhi Jane dete the
Arjun ke pass gandhiva tha jo ki unhe Agni dev se mila tha
Arjun aur karn ka samna Kai baar hua har baar Arjun bhari pade kyuki unke pass ek Divya dhanush tha
Par jab kurukshetra ki bari aai to karn Arjun pe bhari pade kyuki kurukshetra ke yudh me karn ke paas bhi Vijay dhanush tha jo ki ek Divya dhanush tha shiv ji ka parshuram ji ke dwara diya gya tha
Karn Arjun par bhari pad rhe the tabhi krisna ji ko chal chalni padi wo Arjun ke rath ko daldali jagah le gye jaha karn ka rath fas gya aur wo rath ka pahiya nikal rha tha us waqt ki marne ka aadesh diya
Kyuki jab tak wo Vijay dhanush karn ke hath me tha wo haar nhi sakta tha
@@technikdhanuk4773 Kripya granth padhiye aur serials par vishwaas mat keejiye.
Karna gurudakshina yudh me Drupada se parasth hokar bhag gaye the. Tab Phalguna ne Drupada ko bandhi banaya tha. Tab Phalguna ke paas Gandiva nahi thi.
Gandiva kabhi Phalguna ko koyi vishesh shakti nahi deti thi. Phalguna itne mahabahu the ki yudh me puri kshamta ke saath sara sandhaan karte samay sadharan dhanush toot jati thi. Iss liye unhe atoot Gandiva diya gaya tha. Gandiva ki tankaar sunkar shatru bhaybheet iss liye hote the kyuki uss dhanush ko chalane wala koyi aagaya tha. Gandiva ko uthakar uspar pratyancha chadana bhi kathin tha.
Kya aapko gyaat hai ki 'Vijay dhanush' ke bare me kitne logo ne kaha tha? Keval ek. karna. Wo bhi unhone 17th din Suyodhana se yeh baat kaha tha.
Jab swayam Sri Parashurama Kuru sabha gaye aur raja Dhritrashtra ko yudh ke virudh salah di, tab bhi unhone keval Nara Narayana avatara Phalguna, Sri Hari, aur Gandiva ke bareme hi kaha.
Lol, She just gave the Shukhni position to Karna.😂👌
she only spoke the truth
@@ankeetabose2059 who knows which version of Karna she is speaking off. It is said Mahabharat happened many times on our earth and different versions of earth in different times lines and in each timeline different versions of same character are present.😮💨
@kvsingh9678
Sach bata tu loki dekh Aa rha hai na
@@rutwikkulkarni39 not for know but when season will end I will watch it. And Search about (Kakabhushundi) on youtube, I am just talking about what some hindu religious scriptures written about theory of multiverse and how 4 yugas repeats after time to time on earth. There was once an incident regarding Lord Ram and Hunuman ji when Lord Ram enlightened Hunuman ji about theory of multiverse. Well I can't do anything, if Hindus themself don't believe in their religious scriptures and have a habit to question Spirituality from ancient times,from the point of view of today's time period.
@@rutwikkulkarni39bhai Loki ka pata nhi ... but yahi mana jata hai.... mahabharat ke bhut sare adhaye hai
Me yeah nhi janta ki karan bura tha yaha axha... Me bus itna janta hu ki karn ek daanveer tha.. is liye mujhe karn ka charcter axha laga..❤️
Kounsa danveer bhai? Tuje pata bhi hai ek parv ata hai mahabharat mai tb karn bolta hai ki pandav mere se kai jyada daan dharm karte hai aur muje bhi karna chahiye arjun ko harane ke liye !! Tab se bhaisahab ne daan karna shuru kiya!! Aur baadme hugg bhi diya jab indra dev aye 😂
@@adarshkulkarni182 ch***yanand jab indra ne khud brahman ka bhesh tyag aur guilty feel karne lage to swayam bole ki meri galti ke liye tumhe kuch dena chahta hu.. aur age ka to tumne padha hi hai... Mahabaharart me kahi bhi dharm nahi.. dono side se adharm hi hua hai.. 🤣
@@adarshkulkarni182 murkh admi mere kai jyada karte hai... mere se ... matlab vo pehle se hi karta tha... basics me gadbadi tumhare bhai🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@leo_leo_leo_leo_leo366 kaha padha? Batana to jra!! Ya dekha serial mai?
@@adarshkulkarni182I've never read it in Mahabharata pls tell me chapter and verse no.?
Karn bhagoda thaa .. aur jinko jhut lg raha toh padho aur comment karo
Ami Ganatra ji 🙏 for a Nice Presentation . One Situation is confusing in Mahabharat . Why Arjun could not kill Karn in the last battle till he was armed if he was superior ? Why only when he was armless ?
Arjun was a very compassionate man, even as a warrior. The entire gist of the Bhagawad Geeta is because of Arjun's compassion and emotions towards his opponents. It shows the heart of a kind and good human who stayed kind towards even his enemies in the most adverse situations. Only once Arjun lost his temper, this was at Jayadratha, who was responsible for Abhimanyu's death.
Arjun had single handedly defeated the entire Kuru army, that included Bheeshma, Drona, Karna, Ashwathama etc. in the battle of Virata. Arjun's ability was far superior than all others, with the only exception of his elder brother Bheem. Arjun and Bheem towered over all other warriors at Kurukshetra and the Kauravas never stood any chance, especially after Bheeshma fell.
In the final battle with Karna, Arjun showed the same compassion. Arjun was far stronger and yet stayed defensive. One should interpret these only as war tactics. There are dialogues between Arjun, Krishna and Bheem during his battle with Karna. Both ask Arjun to not show compassion and vanquish Karna. Krishna even tells Arjun to use his Sudarshan chakra if he wants but Arjun refuses. Bheem tells Arjun that if he is feeling compassionate, he himself will vanquish Karna. All these events lead eventually to the chariot wheel episode where Karna begins lecturing about fairness to Krishna and Arjun, and Krishna finally reminds Karna of all his evil acts, and tells Arjun that such a person deserves no further compassion from him. 🙏
@@anjaneyamarut868Well put man !! 🙏🙏
@@anjaneyamarut868If Bheem was so strong, then why was he defeated by Karn in the Mahabharat war and Karn had to spare him for keeping the promise he had made to Mata Kunti.
@@munniupadhyay6392 Come out of these fictional TV serials. What is this fiction about Karna defeating Bheem? I have the Sanskrit Mahabharat in front of me and I can read Sanskrit. Please quote me the shloka where this happened. Bheem was focused on the Kaurava siblings, he had no inclination to get involved with Karna. Karna was one of many who ambushed and killed young Abhimanyu. If he was so great why could he not defeat even a kid like Abhimanyu? Forget Arjun and Bheem, they were far more powerful, Karna was no match even for Abhimanyu.
Please understand that Karna was not unarmed. He was cursed to die after losing his knowledge of Bhargavastra and became niradhara (no chariot). Even after his chariot wheel was stuck in mud, Karna continued fighting with Phalguna while on the ground. For example, he fired Brahmastra on Phalguna who countered it with his own Brahmastra. Phalguna fired Agneyastra on him, which he countered with Varunastra. At the end, he was unable to stop Phalguna's Anjalikastra, which beheaded him.
Everyone who is complaining. Why don't you read Vyas ji's Mahabharat, the original text. I have not read it myself and I have only see B R Chopra's Mahabharat. But I am not stupid to fight and call someone names if I have not done my homework. We know text is seldom translated as is from text to screen, they make a lot of changes, they also try to keep the common narrative in public when making epics like this.
For example Lakshman Rekha is not in the original Valmiki Ramayan, but its widely believed to be true so it was there in Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan. Personally I love the sequence but I not going to fight someone if they tell me its not in Valmiki Ramayan. Its fine its not in the original, its good that I know it now but I can still appreciate a bhakt's version or interpretation of this sequence.
So stop calling people delusional if you have not done the reading on your part. First read, then you have bullet points to argue else it's like shooting blank rounds of a pistol.
Lakshman Rekha is first mentioned in Bengali Ramayana
No I don't think I will
In Mahabharat nobody was ultimate hero or villain including Karna. But here Karna is being interpreted as villain. That is the problem. Yudh in Mahabharat didn't happend because of Karn, but yes, Duryadhan believed as he has Karn with him, so he will win. Karna for sure had big mouth, but he still was bir, neither Karna could defeat Arjun, nor Arjun could defeat Karna. Being Sut was not bad, it was not gaali, if we think it is gaali, then it is our fault, not Karna's. And yes, specifically Arjun used to call him Sut/Sutputra which hurt Karna a lot. If we think Karna was being discriminated for being "neech jati", again it is our fault, not Karna's. If we think Karna was hero, it is also our fault, not Karna's. He didn't came to us and begged to call him "hay bechara" saying all these drama.
@@ciaray5432not true. Karna himself called his charioteer as sutputra. Sutputra was a Nobel term. The narration of mahabharata starts with suta ugrashava sauti & when he is narrating the story everyone is calling him suta.
To ami madam. Was karna not being treated rudely by the contemprary society still then duryodhan was loving him taking aside caste and creed. Krishna did not marry radha because she was belonged to peasant.
This is why i must say films are tool to make public opinion.
Actually if you go through Mahabharat you see karna always shows victim card. Even today.
Without getting into how good or bad Karna was, one thing i found unacceptable was that he promised Kunti that he wouldn't kill 4 of her sons - He did not have that right as he had already promised his friend Dhuryodan that he would do whatever it took to win the battle for him. Even if you are the greatest Daanveer, you can only give something you have - when Kunti was begging for her sons' safety, Karna gave away something which he did not have
Bro miss ami ganatra missed many things in this podcast streaming about karna. There are Several facts about karna is greatest Archer among all of them in the battlefield. Second point lord Krishna committed that karna is a greatest Archer and also has that capability to defend Arjuna. So my request if you telling about untold facts about karna than you should mention about his plus points there are Several things you missed up mam 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@@rhitickdas1790 Karna is nowhere close to the greatest archer in the battlefield. This is just fiction created by some modern writers. Karna is one of the principal villains of the Mahabharat. There is a teaching why the eldest son of Kunti, Karna, is the villain and follower of Adharma whereas the five younger ones are upright and followers of Dharma.
The greatest warriors in the Mahabharat are clearly mentioned by Krishna in the Geeta. Nowhere Krishna acknowledges Karna as better than Arjun. Arjun and Bheem tower over all others in the battlefield. Next are their sons Abhimanyu and Ghatotkacha. The only warrior on the Kaurava side who could match them was Bheeshma. This is why when Bheeshma was commander, the battle was somewhat even for 11 days. After Bheeshma fell, Karna came into the battle because until this time his ego was sulking. Satyaki, Drishtadyumna were also stronger than Karna. Arjun was way ahead, Karna was no match even for young Abhimanyu. Karna was one amongst many who ambushed and killed young Abhimanyu in the chakravyuha. If Karna was so great, why could he not defeat Abhimanyu one on one? Why did he have to be part of the ambush?
Abhimanyu fell on the 13th day and this incensed Krishna and the Pandavas so much, that the Pandavas vanquished all others within the next 5 days.
@@anjaneyamarut868 It's just your opinion .
You read Bori CE Mahabharat
And then definitely you realised both dark and glittering sides of Karna
Fact is Mam just telling about his dark side .
And to know Krishna's opinion on Karana you read Drona Parva ( Ghottotkacha Vadh)
okkk
@@anjaneyamarut868And yes in Bori you will find the exact same phrase " Karna supreme among those who upheld Dharma " okk ( in Debroy version )
Remember Bori - considered most researched Mahabharat which clarify Karna being Drona's disciple , many times instigated Duryodhana and all these things mam had told
but apart from many good things about him also mentioned in Bori .
@@rhitickdas1790krishna only says that Karn is better so that Arjun doesn't get arrogant. If krishna really believed so then why did he not says that anywhere else. Infact when karn tells Arjun to follow dharm and not attack him, krishn immediately shuts him up about how much of an adharmi he was and he has no right to ask Arjun to follow dharm. Krishna proceeds to order Arjun to kill Karn. About danveer, Karn was already warned about Indra asking for kavach kundal, he knew his kavach can only help save him but won't help in killing Arjun so in return he asks an Astra that would kill Arjun. If he was so capable why did he ask for a specific weapon to kill Arjun. Not to forget Arjun has defeated him twice alone.
If karna was not a good person
Then why he would spared his brother life
He could have been killed any of pandavas any other than arjuna?????
Suyodhana also loved his own brothers and mourned their deaths in Kurukshetra. Rather a low bar, wouldn't you say?
Lol
Mahabharata Granth read koru... Bhim aur Yudhishtir ne bhi Karn ko jivan dan dia tha... Bhim ne toh bht bar use hara kar chor dia tha Arjun ki Protigya ki man rakhne ke lie
Proof - (4th Khand Vyas rachit Mahabharata)
Because he promised to mother kunti that he will only kill arjuna
@@mintubora5991bhim ka samajh gaya par karn ne kyon vardan diya...agar wo evil tha to maar deta bhim ko....
Evil log Daani nahi hota bahen...
Aise to ravan bhi shiv bhakt tha , to kya wo acha tha ? Anpadh
bhai kya bol raha he , sun bolte he na bade bade 2 number ke kam karne vale log kafi dan dharam karte he kyoki unka pap chupaya ja sake or unhe lage ham punya kama rahe he or ham punishment se bach jayenge, to please apne jo grantha he oh padho tumko har ek sawal ka jawab milega
Mai v pdha hu Mahabharata yai kuch v bolrhi iske chacha the lgta h vedvyas hrr kuch kaan me btaye h
During Virat Yudh no one was sure they were facing Arjun as Vrihanala. But Arjun was aware of whom he was facing. Hence, he used appropriate weapons against each of those warriors. Hence Arjun had an upper hand. And while fighting Gandharva's Kaurava's were drunk heavily. Not in a state to fight with their might. Hence got defeated easily.
She thinks she knows more than Tulsi Das
Tulsidas wrote Ramcharitramanas not mahabharata😂
Bro the lady is 100% right
Just read the real mahabharat history than argue on this topic
Long Story Short- No Caste System existed in Hinduism. 😅😅
You can look at dna data. Caste is only 2000 year old. And mahabharat is 1400 bce event as per archaeologists. UK still practices caste hierarchy. Its present and was present in all societies. Without hierarchy there is no functioning. A general cant perform duty of president. Similarly a laborer cant be treated as president.
If u say mahabhart is 1400 bce. And if u believe that everything is present in the puranas. Can u please elaborate about why there is no description of dinosaurs ?
@@peacedmind9300 dinosaurs in puranas? 🤣
Your Karma determines your Varna - Focus on Education - Brahmin, Focus on Strength and Fighting - Kshatriya. Focus on Business - Vaishya. Focus on Services and Small business - Shudra. Nothing is permanent.
Caste is not our word. We have Kul (Family), Jati (Ethnicity), Varna (Education and Occupation).
Ab kuch colours par Mahabharata dekhne vale didi ko gali denge
Some how I don't agree with the views expressed by her . Karna was the most complex character of Mahabharata and you can't just paint him in black and white. I don't claim to have precise knowledge of scriptures but let as look into it fact wise according to the books.
1) Like other pandavas he was also the son of a God then is it not natural that he also possesed extraordinary physical and mental capabilities like his other brothers.
2) He was taught by Lord Parsuram himself, there was gurukul system back in those days and Gurus did test capabilities of their students as we know from the texts so doesn't it imply that lord Parsuram found him capable enough to make him his student.
3) When he came to know that he was the eldest Kuntiputra he could have had the whole world at his feet . Lord Krishna had also advised him to break the news and go to pandavas in a last attempt to avoid conflict . What a sly and purely wicked fellow as portrayed in the podcast could have done in such a situation if he only had a craving for recognition and power.
There are several other facts also but I leave you with these three.
I am not interested in who was stronger because it's a wrong way to look at our scriptures . Infact we should learn from them. (One thing that has been rightly observed is the fact of friendship of doom. ) Exactly in what sense is quite debatable. 🙏
Karna was not at all complex, it's simple - he was as cruel and wicked just like duryodhana.. That's why they were best friends.
Indeed he was powerful as he was a demon named Sahasrakavacha in his previous life.
@Alien-user Dear sir I don't know what brings you to that opinion because as far as I know he was also referred as daanveer and is revered for his acts of giving away which is a act of kindness, infact he gave away his single kawach knowing that the Brahman asking for it is Indra. Sahasrakawach had already lost his 999 kawach in previous birth he had only one in this birth given by his father sun God in form of kawach and kundal.
2nd point is that a purely cruel person would have killed 3 of his brothers when he had the opportunity to do so on the battlefield. Leave alone Arjuna and Bheema if you consider them to be stronger.
There are other other events also that reflects his kindness but anyway its pointless to debate on that because as I said that we should learn from our scriptures. My only conclusion is whoever stands against Dharma falls may it be pious people like Bhisma and Drona also.
So choose your side and friends very carefully and belive me it's a very difficult choice to make. 🙏
Jab aap samne hi baithe ho toh headphones kyu laga rakhe hai😂
Arjun was the great warrior but karna is karna
Ami Ganatra ji... Just wanted to bring to your notice that the only three warriors who could ever kill Kichak are Bhimasena, Balarama and Shalya (not Karna as you mentioned in this video). Ref: Mahabharata, Virata, 29.19
I think that was a slip of tongue because she was talking about karn. She also said karn instead of arjun in the video once. This podcast setup might be new for her. Her knowledge is so in depth and complex in comparison to the very basic questions the host is asking that she wants to say all the things that she has in her mind to clear out these outrageous misconceptions which probably led to this tiny slip up.
@@dr.anaB777 she don't know anything she was a bussinesswoman
@@niveditamishraji3338 lol she is way more knowledgeable than you. Keep hating. The only person that hate would affect is you.
@@dr.anaB777 Perhaps you are right. Being a follower of Veer Bhimasena and an adherent researcher of Mahabharata myself, I really admire her knowledge.
Even Karna was the person who suggested Duryodhan to strip Draupadi... Written in Mahabharata
Bro I don't know you have read which Mahabharata but according to my knowledge it was Dhuryodhan's brother dushshasan who asked for it🤦🏻🤦🏻
Read the real Mahabharat written by vedvyas @@RishabSharma6969
@@RishabSharma6969 no it was karna himself who insulted draupadi + suggested duryodhan to disrobe drauapdi
@@AradhyaMalhotra-wb4tn Bro it was Dhuryodhan himself who asked striping draupati and although I agree that karna insulted draupadi and called her a prostitute he didn't suggest anyone to strip her down ...Please clear your doubts as soon as possible!!
@@RishabSharma6969. No, it was karna.
Sun is a gana debata. He is equal to bishnu with his identity. If the sun and kunti is good how there son is bad. Inadra is a henpecked do arjun was also a henpecked. He killed bhurishraba from the behind.
Arjun always used divine bow "Gandhiv" but Karna always used ordinary bow.
When Karna used "Vijay Dhanush" on the last day, Arjun realised that Karna was as great as he was.
Krishna saved Arjuna from certain death from Karna three times.
I have never mentioned Karna 's kavach kundal
show me any proof from any authentic version of mahabharat
Aur tu bc karn ka sarathi tha sb pata hai padh Jake Mahabharata
Arjun had pashupatastr of Lord Shiva just read about it what Pashupatastr could do. No weapon was even near to it. And Arjun himself was an incarnation of lord. So how can Karn could defeat him.
Before the ultimate war, Arjun and Karn had many face offs and competitions where Arjun emerged winner
Also arjun took a oath that he never use divine weapons by his own side.
@@saumyavigaya4441 hahaha all rubbish, inspired by tv serial lies, Karna was not even 10℅ of what Arjuna was,
Arjuna was called Vijay, Dhanjay, he always defeated Karna one on one or in group, never ever in original ved vyasa Mahabharata Arjuna defeat mentioned .
In all Bramahand except Lord Shiva no dev , rakash, aur manager could defeat Arjuna,
U may sympathy karn as tragic hero but he was more evil than duryodhana
U can not change the facts
Excellent video.
I think Karna and Dduryodhana were both victims of a self imposed, never ending, victim mentality. Karna had been dealt and unfortunate hand by providence during birth. He did overcome it rising to becoming a warrior and a king. But he continued to wallow in self pity.
If we compare Karna to Krishna we see the difference. Krishna too was raised as a non royal, called names, had insults hurled at him for his lowly status, but he never wallowed in self pity, he took it all with a smile.
Duryodhana is the typical "bechara", rich kid, spoilt with high aspirations, a huge ego and an inability to accept defeat sportingly. His ego is bolstered by his parents' inability.
The friendship of karna and Duryodhana is indeed a friendship of doom.
At the end of it, there is no black and white character in the Mahabharat, they are all full of shades of grey. It's the most fantastic mindblowing, blockbuster magnum opus ever.
Friendship of karna and duryodhana was doom 😂😂😂
You can't compare krishna with karna. Because krishna is Avatar of God and he is free from jealous, selfishness and other thought complexities. But karna is not like that he is human just like us with many shades of emotions. May be they had went through same situations but their thought processing was different.
@@naturaleza9816 krishna is supreme truth i agree with you ❤
This lady needs to talk about why the Pandavas ended up in hell.
Krishna himself chosen to be the sarathi!! The historical facts can be interpretted in multiple ways so who is right or wrong is not a big deal! But the path Karna chose was wrong and he should have rectified it through his karma! But what happened with Karna is also not right hence all those people who were directly or indirectly a part of his fate also suffered and that is KARMA...KARMA is the ULTIMATE DHARMA!!
Everybody has their own narration and perspectives . Nothing is black nothing is white. Everything is grey.
Yes both Pandava and Kauravas were equally adhramiks
Abe padh le Karan ka gooh khane wale uske fan
A gaye centrist
Then tell me HOW SURYAPUTRA CAN BECOME A EVIL!!!
Karna was never responsible for mahabharat war. He was only loyal to duryodhana. While karna wanted respect, acknowledgement and fame, duryodhana took advantage of opportunity and made karna king of Ang desh.
Gandharva Yudh mein Bhaag Gaya tha.
Virat Yudh mein Bhaag Gaya Tha
Duryodhan Best Friend😂😂😂😂
Please read the books. Karna didn't need respect because he already had it. He was simply jealous of Phalguna and wanted to show his off skills.
@@SomeoneOfficialRealabsolutely but ye sonyputra tv seriel dekhne wale logon ko kaun samjhaye
@@SomeoneOfficialRealaakhri yudh m jab Arjun marne wala toh krishna n bacha liya 😂😂 usko kya bolega bhai😂😂
@@tushardahlan5196 Kripya granth padhiye aur serials par vishwaas mat keejiye.
Karan danvir tha.. Sbse bada danvir aur daan se bada kch nhi hota.
Ese to ravan bhi mha gyani tha mha pandit tha ramji se hr chij m shresth tha lekin tha to charitr ka gira hua or adharmi isliye har gya tha same chij karn k sth hua usne bhi adharm ka sth diya isliye vo bhi hara
@@rohitchaudhary3709 ravan shri ram se shreshth tha har chiz me?
Lol 😹 get some brain kiddo.
@@mohitraj9237 Phle dang se pad mere reply ko mene bola charitr or dharm m ramji hi bde the uske alawa to hr chij m ravan jyada bdiya tha chahe vo knowledge m ho bhakti m ho ya rajya m sb ravan k pas jyada tha lekin fir bhi vo hara kyunki vo tha adharmi hi
Aisa kya daan de diya Karn ne zara bataiye to
No he was as bad as Duryodhana, his character is whitewashed in TV series. He wasn't a Shudra. His foster father was a Kshatriya and third son of King of Kashi, his mother was a Brahmin. They were rich landlords not someone living in a hut. That's a fake narrative of TV serials. He desired Draupadi too so incited Duryodhana to assault her. He was like a one sided lover taking revenge. Yes he was daani etc n had good qualities too but then no one is 💯 black or white in Mahabharat. All have shades of grey, but he was certainly not the victim like he is portrayed.
करण के पीछे हाथ धो कर पड़ गई है अम्मी बहिन।😅
Karna was brave . But he just kept poteaying himself as a victim . Again and again. Despite the fact that Duryodhan kept him besides him Gave him a kingdom. Made him ruler. Always took his side against hisnown family members. Still Karna kept his,"Iam a victim" mentality alive.
karna was not brave. he had tried to save his life and escape when the gandharvas attacked them in the forest. infact he left duryodhan at their mercy! what kind of bravery is this? he was a coward
@@ankeetabose2059 This never happened.
In fact BR Chopra himself said that he had introduced this of his own imagination (or creativity) to show Duryodhan as villain and Pandavas as the good guys
i am very sorry, but this wasnt introduced by b r chopra ji. he had never said anything like that. i'm not talking about the serial . i am talking about the real mahabharata, from where this story was taken. and gandharvas werent tribals like they showed in the serial. they were celestials, and their king was maharaj chitrasen, who was the arjun's best friend and had taught him dance and music. they had come to attack duryodhan because they knew why duryodhan had gone there, to mentally torture the pandavas.
this si the real story, not what they showed in b r chopra ji's mahabharat. kindly read the mahabharat first. this is part of the epic. karna was a coward, its proven hence@@satishkamtikar958
@@ankeetabose2059if he was not brave he would have never gave his karnakundala to devendra since he knew it was there for his protection. Despite being in a Warfield with a huge pressure of jay parajay he gave his karnakundala.
i think we should stop taking sides.........every individual in mahabharata had its flaws....and that is the whole point of mahabharata..........we need to learn from the ethical dilemmas of every character and improve our life...instead of debating who was good, evil, loyal or strong. As far as over-glorification is considered, tv shows and movies will NEVER be able to do justice to epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana. Its impossible to show everything, and some facts would be missed, which can give skewed perspective. Best is to read from original text whenever you get time. The guest in this podcast has done exactly this. More people should do this.
Who is watching after bhartwanshi sir video💫❤️
She has good data to make sense...
Inhone ne to ye bhi bol diya tha hanumanji ke pass gada nahi thi tab galiya de rahe the 😂...aur karn ke bare me negative bol do to waah waah 😂
@@pragneshkumar2517unhone ye nahi bola ki gadha nahi hai, but ramayan main gadha nahi thi badmain kuber ne gift kri thi. Aur Hanuman ji ne khud kaha ki unki sabse badi Shakti Ram naam hai, unhe aur kisi shastra ki zarurat nahi
Lady go recheck your facts. Just talking bs on mic won't help. Here's some facts:
1. Consider a scenario where your family is traveling in a car, and your father is driving it. Compare this to a situation where you have hired a driver. Is the role of the driver and your father the same? Does this imply that your father and the hired driver deserve the same respect? Similarly, Karna's father was a charioteer, while Krishna was part of the royal family.
2. Dronacharya refused to teach Karna, stating that he had sworn to teach only the royal families of the Pandavas and Kauravas. Consequently, Karna had to seek instruction elsewhere. Given that Drona took Eklavya's thumb to ensure Arjuna remained the best, it was fortunate for Karna that he found a different teacher.
3. Karna was the epitome of dharma. He promised Kunti that she would have five sons alive at the end of the war. He defeated all the Pandavas except Arjuna and spared their lives, keeping his word.
4. A Arjun fan like you, who killed Karna behind the backs 13:33 13:33 wouldn't understand what is dharm, being man of your words etc which was more important to real Kshatriyas. That's why karna gives away his kawach, spares 4 pandavs, etc.
Lastly, it is important to note that history was written under the supervision of the Pandavas.
1) कर्ण अर्जुनसे कम से कम 10 साल बडा था | कुंती ने कर्ण को जन्म देने के बाद 2-3 साल बाद शादी की | 3-4 साल राजा पांडू के साथ अरण्यविहार हुआ | उसके बाद पांडू को शाप मिला | उसके बाद 2-3 साल बाद पुत्रकामना में कुंती ने यमधर्म का आवाहन किया | पहला पुत्र धर्मराज, दुसरा पुत्र भीम और तिसरा पुत्र अर्जुन |
अब बताओ की एक 10 वी का बच्चा अगर प्रथम कक्षा की बच्चे से द्वेष करता हैं तो क्या उसका दिमाग ठीक होगा?
2) अगर तब ड्रायव्हर को कम समझा जाता तो क्या राजा शल्य कर्ण के सारथी बनते? क्या विराट पुत्र अर्जुन का सारथी बनता? क्या श्रीकृष्ण अर्जुन के सारथी बनते?
3) कर्ण बचपनसेही हमेशा दुर्योधन के साथ रहता था | इसका प्रमाण महाभारत में आदिपर्व में मिलता हैं | जब भीम को कालकुट नाम का विष पिलाकर दुर्योधन, कर्ण, शकुनी आदी लोगोने गंगा में बहा दिया था |
4) ऐसी ही चाटुकारीता से उसे अंगदेश का राज्य मिला | जिसके प्रधान उसके पिताजी थे |
@deepak__k No. Bori has removed Karna's name from this incident.
Now people use this statement and say that Karna tried to kill pandavas.
Then Duryodhana, Karna and Subala’s son Shakuni tried many other means to kill the Pandavas.
First, there were just kauravas and Pandavas and then suddenly Karna appears in just one sentence. Strange!!
It's written that Karna tried to kill pandavas by many other means! Do we have any cross reference about it? Bheem poisoning and lakshagrih has cross references but this many other means have no cross reference. Strange!!
An outsider (Karna) is trying to kill pandavas (many times) and still the elders of hastinapur like bheeshma, Vidura etc.. are silent!! Strange!!
If Karna would have tried to kill pandavas then bheeshma would have never let him learn with Pandavas from drona. Forget about learning, he would have never let Karna enter in hastinapur again.
So this statement is clearly an interpolation. I don't care if it's in kmg or bori or any other version but this is logically impossible.
And also there was no direct mention of karna in both the cases
Although I'm not a fan of karna your last words intrigued me.
"History is written by Victors".
@ayushagarwal3307
1. First of all please don’t compare driving a warrior’s chariot in a battle to that of driving a car on a road in our modern world. A sarthi is supposed to have knowledge of warfare, ranneeti and excellent chariot steering skills. It’s the sarthi’s duty to ensure that the warrior fighting from the chariot is shielded from enemy attacks while at the same time has an advantageous position to attack enemies. Also, apart from just being Bhishma’s charioteer, Adhirath was a chieftain of the Anga rajya which was a suta community ka rajya that owed allegiance to Hastinapur. So please don’t compare a rath sarthi to a car driver 🙏
2. Karna learnt initial education from Dronacharya this is mentioned in Adi parva 131.10 to 131.12 please check for yourself. He was never denied education because he was a Sutaputra. When he asked Drona for brahmastra and Drona refused he went to Parashuram.
3. Please don’t say Karna was epitome of dharma. An epitome of dharma would never lose control of his tongue and call the daughter in law if a royal kingdom a whore and would not suggest disrobing. Yes he defeated other Pandavas but we should not forget that he was also defeated by Bheema and Satyaki during the same war.
It’s always said that history is a victor’s tale. But I have a logic for this. So I hope uk that as Vichitravirya died heirless, Vyas was called for niyoga and Dhritarashtra and Pandu were born. Practically speaking, he was the biological father of Dhritarashtra and Pandu. The Kauravas were Dhritarashtra’s own blood while on the other hand, the Pandavas were not Pandu’s own blood. So ideally the Kauravas were Vyas ke apne khoon. But he still says Kauravas were adharmi and Pandavas dharmi isliye pandavon ki jeet hui. So it’s basically Vyas Maharshi ke vanshajon ki kahani
@vishwaajithpemmasani1198 In the text it was written that there were two reasons for the refusal of dronachariya.
Here it is:
one day approached Drona in private and said these words unto him, 'I desire to be acquainted with the Brahma weapon, with all its mantras and the power of withdrawing it, for I desire to fight Arjuna. Without doubt, the affection thou bearest to every one of thy pupils is equal to what thou bearest to thy own son. I pray that all the masters of the science of weapons may, through thy grace, regard me as one accomplished in weapons!' Thus addressed by him, Drona, from partiality for Phalguna, as also from his knowledge of the wickedness of Karna, said, 'None but a Brahmana, who has duly observed all vows, should be acquainted with the Brahma weapon, or a Kshatriya that has practised austere penances, and no other.'
Obviously Drona refused to offer him Brahmastra..
In Narada’s view the reasons for Drona’s refusal
His partiality for Arjuna
Karna's mindset
And yeah, I agree with your other points.
Yudhisthra is main culprit, who treated his wife as property, whether you are a woman & you shall treat yourself as property.
You are talking in negative perspective,
Why you not talk about bhishma, who committed the offence of kidnapping of three women.
How pandav are good, who are powerful, but can't fight for saving their wife.
You are showing negative prespective just to be famous.
It was Karna, who raises the issue of cast discrimination,
He saved the life of pandavs,
He donated his kavach & last if
Karan is not powerful, why he was killed armless.
bhai mahabharat padh le, kam se kam gita toh padle bak ne se pehle. you will find every answer.
Padh le Mahabharata gawar
@@rukmini_shyamBhai dhusro ko bolney sey pehle tum padkar unko samjana , har koi aapkey jaisey na hotana 😂😂 Har vyakti apkey jaisa Arjun Andra bhakth hotey nahi na jo log karn ko apna manthey hei vo log unka jeevan se manthey hai na aapkey jaisey sir virata hi nahi dhektey maanvatha bi dhektey
@@sganesh2958 bhai aap kya hi bol rahe hain? Yudhishtr ka vrat tha ki woh dyut ko kabhi asweekar nahi kar sakte. Agar mein Arjun ki support na bhi karti tab bhi mein Karn ki koi mahanta ko nahi manti. Usske karan hi inta kaand hua tha
@@rukmini_shyam kuch bi pandavao kiya vah subkuch ka ek kaaran hota jab kaurav kiya ya karn kiya uske piche kuch karan nahi hota aur aap manthey bhi nahi, kya bola aapney yudistir ka vrat tha dyut ko asweekar nahi kar saktha woh galat hai, yudisthir ko as a guest hastinapur mei aaney ko bola tha usi nimantran ko vo asweekar nahi karsakta kyunki wah nimantran unkey bado ney dhiya tha unka apmaan nahi karsakta, unko pata bhi nahi vaha dyut khel honei vala hai jab pata chala woh inkar karsakta kyunki woh Adharm khel hei, khela tho bhi casual sa bhi khel sakta dhav laganey ka kya jarurat hai.
Aap karn ki coin ki ek tharaf dekar hi judgment pass kardhetey, aap sahi mei pada tho har ek ka acha hai bura bhi esa dhekato atleast aapko karan key tharaf pity feel karthey hatered nahi. Aap bias hona chahte hai
JAI SHREE KARNA 🧡🚩
galat logo se inspiration sab hamesha dusro ko dosh dena victim card khelna
@@agentravi00007 Teri kyu jali bhai 🤣
@@vivekpadman5248 Muje kuch nahi wo tum apne consequence khud bhugato jis tarah bhugata tha
@@vivekpadman5248 mein jalti karna ko jyada dikhya jata galat narrative mein bolunga
@@agentravi00007 kuch nahi samjha?
The simplest conclusion is - Anything can happen during a war. Every war is unpredictable. Wars can't judge anyone's Superiority or Inferiority.
Both Karna & Arjuna were very capable warriors. We just can't judge who was better depending on wars, a war can go either way.
& guess what, the fanbases of both Karna & Arjuna already have their own readymade excuses like -
Pashupatastra can destroy the existence only when launched by Lord Shiva himself, not by Arjuna. Pashupatastra is overrated.
Karna had a normal bow while Arjuna had his Gandiva during Virat war, Arjuna also used illusionary weapons which were forbidden.
Karna was drunk that's why he had to retreat from Gandharvas.
Karna was too far away to save his son in time.
Without Sri Krishna, Arjuna was a flop, he couldn't even save Sri Krishna's wives from robbers.
Now wait, the opposite party also has plenty of excuses -
Sri Krishna lied to Arjuna about Karna's armor in order to inspire him, Karna's armor is overrated.
Arjuna could have countered Nagastra, the saving of Arjuna by Sri Krishna was just a matter of precaution.
Arjuna could have countered Bhagadatta's Vaishnavastra, but he didn't, just to show respect to the weapon.
Arjuna was not retreating from Bhargavastra, he was going to meet Yudhistir.
Karna was a flop, he was defeated by Bhima, he was defeated by Satyaki etc etc.
Guess what? at any moment from now, those two great fanbases will start bombarding my comment section with these huge lists of excuses & even with their own justifications.
Ahh, I guess I just have to ignore those comments.
Thanks for reading.
He wasn’t evil. But he became bitter and invested in bitterness because of caste discrimination, because of his low birth status, and that’s why he went on becoming Meaner n meaner and instead of becoming a better version of himself he became bitter and made wrong alliances and that trapped him and led to his downfall in the Kurukshetra war
🤡🤡 tv serial
Karna was a complete Villain .
Every body use popular names for self benefit. Madam is also doing the same, nothing else
But why Krishna cried and respect karn if he was evil 😐
He didn't
@@jyothiradithya2000 read Mahabharata dude
@@vinodnaik7002Read. That's why saying.
Who told u Kaaye serial mein dekhaa
@@jyothiradithya2000 Padha hai to bta de karna death ke baad swarg gya tha ya Nark ??
FIR BHI KARNA MUJHE PRIY HAI
Haan kalyug hai 😂Ram ji or krishna ji predicted that
@@DivyanshYadav-ti9eb किसी महापुरुष ने कहा हैं दान से बड़ा कोई दान नहीं और कर्ण हमेशा से ही दान देता आया है।
@@the___root__user143 uss yuga me kayi log daan dete the. Jarasandha bhi bade daani the, jiske karan Sri Hari ne unse Vrikodara ke saath ‘malla yuddha’ ka daan manga tha.
Aur Kavacha Kundala dena daan nahi tha, vyapaar tha.
Britishers ki Divide and Rule policy se bahar aao.
Achi baat ek aurat ko ko vesya bolne wala aur bole ki isse nanga bhi kr doge tho koi frkh nhi padega esa insan jarur priy hoga bagwan kre koi apko maa bhen ko esa na bole bs aur khi tb aap bole muje wo priy hai
People who learn Mahabharat by watching TV serial:-Karna is hero
People who learn Mahabharat by reading original vyasa Mahabharat:-Arjun is great
Wah waaahhh behen ji apne to pura mahavarat hea badak diya 😂😂😂
Sister I agree with ur every point, but who can tell me k vaasu dev da zayada attachment Arjun to zayada karan naal c??
Ofcourse Arjun ye bi koi puchne vali bt h Mahabharat chodho bhagwat Geeta me hi Krishna ji ne kaha h ki jo Arjun ka shatru h vo mera bi shatru h kyuki ma or Arjun ek hi hain kbi alg ni ho skte
Ye dekho draupadi ka punarjanm 🤡
Karan ke paas kundal kavach tha kya?
No ... 😂😂😂😂😂 Karna ek bcha tha Jo Chahta usko hra kr chla jata tha .. according to BkL group
Joot nahi bolte toh kya parashuram sikhate ? .... Yaad rakhna , jab joot kaha tha , tab parashuram karn ke guru nahi the ....
Aur ye sahi baat hai , dronacharya ne kaha ab tum brahmastra seekne ke layak nahi ho ? Aur jab karn , parashuram ke paas jaate hai , woh sikha dete hai karn ko 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Karna was a morally grey. It is hard to classify him as good or evil. He has many good qualities and some bad qualities as well. Which is what makes him one of the best written characters in Mahabharat
How can someone tell the exact line and in exact sequence about any topic given to him, if he/she is telling from her inner knowledge and not on any rattafication ?...
Bcoz if i ask any priest sant and gyaani even theh cannot tell me the exact thing and in exact sequence...then how can she able to tell all these things in exact manner in multiple podcasts...??
Coz usni padhi hi hein .. damn it.. usne isi topic research Kiya.. toh tumko kya lgta hei ki wo ESI hi bolingi kya... Thora sa yukti se baat Kiya Karo bhai
Rattafication lol bhai unhone utna time Diya hai tab itna yad hai ok na jab ved vyas ka Mahabharat padhoge na to tumhe bhi knowledge hoga
@@haripriyagohainboruah7292 LOL KOUNSA RESEARCH MAINE PADHA HAI UNKA BOOK SABSE GATIYA HAI NIYOG KO GLORIFICATION KARTA HAI.
Priest lougo ko aajkal sirf Mantr padhna aata hain lekin Bhagawad Gita ya Mahabharat unhe bhi yaad nahi aur reason bhi yeh hain ki unhe time nahi milta ye sab padhne ka kyunki Puja mein busy rehte hain.
Actual gyan humein researchers se hi milega
Because archaeologist have find it out by carbon dating in kurukshetra
Pandvo ko acha kehne waalo bas ek jawab do- yudhishthir kaisa dharmraj jo apne bhai aur biwi ko juwe mai khele😂😂
Arjun ko mahaan bolne waalo-sri krishna swayam keh gaye agar wey aur bajrangbaliji n hote toh arjun kab ka haar gaya hota.
Dronacharya ko acha bolne waale- ye batao usne eklavya ka angootha aur karn ko siksha dene se kyu mana kiya.
Dhongiyo k paskh lene waale dhongi hote hai.
Karn arjun se mahan tha jaise veer savarkar gandhi se, sachai nahi badalti, koi kuch bhi bole
Yudhishthira ka mati bhram ho gaya tha lekin Kaurav aur Karna ka toh dimag sahi jagah pe tha toh kyun Karn ne Draupadi ko Vaishya kaha aur usko sabke beech nagn karne ka baat kahan, kyun Karna ne Duryodhan ke saath milkar Bheem ko zeher dia itna mahan agar Karn tha hi, dosti itni acchi thhi toh Gandharvo ke saath jab ladayi Hui thhi toh Duryodhan ko kyun chhod ke bhaga tha Karn ?
Aisi dosti ?
Vo juwa wala scene sabak lene k liye hi h aj k kalyugi manushya k liye ki chahe koi yudhishthira jesa mhan dharmraj hi kyu na ho jua khelne jese adharmik kary krne se buddhi bhrast ho jati h fir manushya ko acche bure ka gyan nhi rhta h or ye kha likha h ki krishnji ne bola ki agr vo or hanuman ji na hote to arjun har jata yudh samapt hone pr arjun ne ye pucha tha ki uska rath abhi tk bilkul shi kese h tb krishn ji ne btaya tha ki ispe swayam hanuman ji virajman the isliye iska koi kch bigad nhi paya tha or tmhre hisab se to fir virat k yudh m bhi krishn ji or hanuman ji honge arjun k sth jb usne akele hi pure kaurwo or guruo ko hra diya tha 😂
Gandhi ji ko savarkar se compare karke tumhari mansikta pta chl gyi . Isliye karn ka favour le rhe ho . Achhhai aur dharm ka sath tum logon ne kabhi nhi dena .
Ramdhari Singh Dinkar ji ne kitna sundar likha hai...
If karna is weak then she is saying only three people can kill kichaka it is Karna, Balaram and Bheema then what about Arjun? If he is so storng just a question so if anybody know answer then plz tell me🙏🙏
Bhai ye log views badhane ke liye apna khudka mahabharat likh rahe
@@manikandaniyer8570she sites examples from the original texts. So please counter with the texts from original text if u want to disprove her
Bro usna karna ko weak nhi kaha unsa karna ko evil kaha joki wo ha just like bhisma na kaha tha despite his skills I won't consider him a maharathi because of his evil nature
She is talking about maal yudh and she had taken wrongly name of Karan here might be she want to say duroydan
She said mistakly bro...if you had watched original 1 and half hour video of hers then she had mistake her words 2 and 3 times
Haa karna hi buraa thaa.... baki sab sidhee....kunti achi thi jisnee karna koo ganaga mee bahaa diyaa, Dronacharya achee thee Eklavya kaa anguthaa kaataa, Bhisham achataa joo kashi ki 3 ladki bhagaa layaa, Yudhishthir achaa thaa joo juvee mee sab haar gayaa bibi koo bhi, Sab achee thee karna hi khraab thaa....
Bhaiya har karya ka Karan hota hai, angraj ne akele sangharsh nhi kiya pandavo ne bhi kiya,
Toh Karn kaise aacha tha jo ek women ko N@ked dekhna chahta tha 🤢
@@yug4883 Abey oh woh draupadi ke upper garments disrobe karne ko kaha tha kyuki draupadi ab dasi ban chuki thi. Dasiya upper garments nahi pehenti thi tab ke time me.
@@AashishKumar-su7og Padva koo sab facility mili education mili, Karna koo education kee liyee zhut bolnaa padaa yee uski mazburi thi , Voo sirf Dharnurdhr hi nahi thaa malla udhay bhi kar saktaa thaa, krisna nahi hotee too Arjun bhi karnaa koo haraa nahi paataa
@@abhisheknahar7363 pata hai Mulle 😂 He said if she comes n@ked then also he have no problem
12 saal se dance sikha rha dholak bja rha arjun without krishna ,without any devine weapon Vs karn preparing fr 12 years fr war with the greatest kaurav army . Result you all know
Nritya Agyaatwash mein shikhaya tha.
इन देवी ने को भी कहा है वह वास्तव में उचित ही कहा है 🙏
अच्छा लगा यह जान कर ली अभी भी लोग सच्चाई से अवगत है
Good or evil is dependent on the observer and obeys the laws of Relativity.
1. Genotype
2. Phenotype
3. Psychotype
4. Avatar.
Projection of avatar is Maya.
Sahi khela hai madam , agar karn apna kavach kundal nahi dete toh aap kehti ki kaha ka dhanveer ... Karna ke achayi ko bhi aapne galat tehra diya , jiske karan aap karn ke against ho .... Arjun sahi banda tha koi doubt nahi ... Lekin mahabharat ke baad wo adivasiyon ke saath bhi nahi jeet saka , uska kya 😂😂
Arjun konse adivasiyo se haar gya bhai ???
@@Abhir_12 bhai jab mahabharat ka yudh katam hogaya .... Uske baad krishna yadhavo se lad raha tha .... Us samay Arjun par sudden attack adivasiyon me saath hua , tab Arjun haar gaya .... Aur usko pata chal gaya , wo mahabharat me itne asaani se isliye jeeta kyuki krishna uske saath tha ....
Uske baad hi toh ,shree krishna ne apna deh chod diya jab bali ka punar janam lene waale , hunter ne shree Krishna ke pairon par ban chala Diya aur krishna avatar katam hogaya
Karan = Son of Surya☀️ & Devi Kunti
Adhirath & Radha ne ☀️Karan🏹 ko Paala tha.
Par wo ek bura insaan tha
Even Krishna mentioned he is the great Archer so he is not evil okay
@@rhitickdas1790 says a 13 year random kid on yt
@@Divine_Vibes_ please clear it properly. I'm not understanding
Ye didi ko mahabharat samjh nhi aayi .
Sut Putra ka ek counter hai mere pass karna ko pata hi nhi tha jb parsuram ne bola tha sut putra aur shrap diye phir apna dhanush diya . To kaise kshatriya aur brahmn ka pata chala didi ko .
Karna ke soft corner hai kyunki wo suryaputra hai unko hamesha chhal se haraya gya .
Duryodhan ko ladne ke karna motivate krta the waah 😂😂
Karna maidaan chhor ke bhag gaya 😂😂😂
Band kro inlogon ko
Sale TV serial ke Mahabharat dekh ke khud ko gyaani samajh raha hai usne padhi hai Mahabharata ved vyas ki ... chup rah tu
Your Karma determines your Varna - Focus on Education - Brahmin, Focus on Strength and Fighting - Kshatriya. Focus on Business - Vaishya. Focus on Services and Small business - Shudra. Nothing is permanent.
आज देख लिया लड़कियों के दिमाग घुटनो पे होता हे आज देख लिया 😂😂
Mere ko anpad gawar dekhna tha. Tera comment padke wo vi dekh liya.
Kyu life mein pehli baar mirror dekh liya kya😂😂😂
Five thousanda back the women were not using saree it was fake story. To defame karna andduryodhan duryodha the plot had been added. Is it proper to gamble woman on a bate. Is it proper to have a wo man among five hubands. If duryodhan had kept draupadi as amaid what would have happened. Karna was noble one. He was a kind hearted man. You have to read jangyaseni by pratibha Roy.
Arjun ne kaha na ki brahman darpok toh isme karan ka kasoor ....
Aap kya jaanengi , kavach kundal dena kitna bada hota .... Kavach kundal ke saamne , ek baar brahmastra use kitna difference hai .... Aur dhaan dena mahaanta ka kaam hi hai , jisse parakne ke liye dil chahiye madam
Abe pagli , jab pitamaha ne keh diya ki woh rati nahi , toh wo kyu war karne aayega ... Arjun ko toh krishna ne bacha liya tha , jab krishna ne apna rath ko jukha diya ... Agar parashuram ka shraab nahi hota toh different hota situation ....
Karn ne gadodgaj ko haraya tha ... Karn haar iske vajah se jaata kyuki uske paas vijay dhanush nahi tha wo samay
Paashupatastra kya hai pata hai? Woh ek aisa astra hai jisme sangsar ke saare entities ka strength jor ke banta hai....Saare entities....Us astra ke ahvahan se, saare devtaon ko apni shakti deni padti hai...saare manushya ko apni shakti, saare jeevon ko apni shakti deni padti hai....Mahadev ke is astra mein, Brahmastra, Brhamashirastra, Brahmandastra, Narayanastra, Gandharvastra, Vaishnavastra...plus plus saare baaki astra ki shakti hoti hai, kyunki saare devtaaon ko, deviyon ko apni shakti deni hota hai Paashupatastra mein aisa agreement (lol) hai....Yeh astra Mahadev ne Karna ko nehi diya.....Arjun ko diya....
Kavach kundal diya par return mein Indrastra/Vasav Shaktiastra maang liya....Arjun ne nehi maanga koi astra....kyunki woh sarvottam NAR hain...jise Narayan ne chuna gyan ke liye....Nar Narayan ka concept samjho ....aur Karn ke naam pe mooth marna band karo....
@@Arajokota Passhupatashtra can not harm vijay dhanush.
@@Arajokota he never ask for indrastra in return after doing donation because it will spoil the integrety of the donation...it was when Indra himself offer him Indrastra as vardan. Kavach Kunal can not break by any astra. He was ajay...Even if you have thrown indrasta on Kavach kundal karn it wont harm him at all. It was absoulute defense. Even Shri Krishna's Sudarshana Chakra can not break his kavach. So first read carefully about mahabharat. then form your opinion. there are lot of loop holes in the stories.
@@adityarajaram3124 Mahadev came and told you this? Personally? And Pashupatastra was to be shot at Vijay Dhanush? Or weilder of Vijay Dhanush....Does logic say that astras can be nullified by the means from which astras are shot? Pashupatastra is the astra of Pinaak Pani...Pinaak is the first dhanush in the world that PinaakPaani created and gave weapons education to the world. Then Pinaak Paani used Pinaak to his hearts content and fucked the shit out of Tripur. No one can match the ultimate or penultimate weapons of the Holy Trinity. Pashupatastra is the penultimate weapon of Pinaak Paani. You really think, Kavach Kundal or Vijay Dhanush would have stopped Sudarshan or Trishul? Is there any boon energy or astra that the Holy Trinity cannot nullify? Krishna himself said it didn't he, that there is no boon, no astra, no energy that he can't fuck the shit out of. Krishna was drunk? Do you know which Kavach Shankhachur had? Even Veerbhadra's Trishul put a hole in in it.
Who are Nar Narayan? Who were they in previous birth? Why didn't Krishna choose Karna?
Nar is Narayan and Narayan is Nar. Arjun is Krishna, and Krishna is Arjun. Arjun's weapons could have become Sudarshan if Krishna wanted. They are inseparable. Didn't Arjun vent out his frustration towards Indradev saying he could have killed Karna even with the Kavach Kundal? Do you think Arjun was drunk to make a claim so big? Have Pandavas ever made a claim that would be over and above their capabilities? The serials glorified Karna, everyone started masturbation in Karna's name. Yet he was destined to die like a pig after all his adharmas...the prime one being calling Draupadi a ****.
You are a Nar, behave like a Nar. Stay on Krishna's side. I know more than you can imagine. I have by hearted KMG Mahabharat...Go and find out who is KMG and what his contribution is towards Mahabharat as we know it today.
@@adityarajaram3124 Do you know about the fight between Vishwamitra and Vasishtha? Problem is the explosion when something strong is match with an equally strong weapon. How can an infallible weapon not break a kavach? It will, but the explosion will be too much too handle. Or else, Indra would not had taken the Kavach. Similar or slightly less powerful Kavach Drona also had, Brahma Kavach. Why didn't Indra take it?
Shankhachur's Kavach was infallible. And PinaakPaani was going to strike it with his Trishul, Narayan did what he had to and took a curse on himself just so that the destruction resulting from an infallible weapon striking an indestructible shield doesn't destroy the universe.
He convinced himself that he is a victim.
People used to call him Sut putta. But that was right.
He was a charioteers son. Just because Duryodhan gave him a seat next to him, gave him so much respect more than his brothers , Karna let it go to his head.
He was a narcissist. He just wanted to be the best. His personal ambitions were more than the requirements of the kingdom
Even Arjun and yudhisthira had ambitions and they also gone to bad extent for it
Well, wasn't he a victim of society's dirt-ridden mind? Wasn't he robbed of all opportunities because of his caste? Well, then he was a victim. But yes, of course, one can't consider him a hero per se. He's done his share of sins due to spite and revenge...and because of his worst decision of partnering with Duryodhana. But I don't believe he was a narcissist. He did things for the sake of DUryodhana..a narcissist may not be able to do that...a narcissist rarely feel indebted to another person...for a narcissist the world revolves around him. For me Karna was neither a villain nor a hero, he was human. A complex character...from whatever I know.
@@ath5978 No, Karna was never 'robbed' of any opportunity in his life. The only time he was stopped was when he tried to enter a presentation area meant for Hastinapura princes. Not being a prince or king isn't discrimination.
Whether he was a full on narcissist or not, , he definitely showed narcissistic tendencies in life. He always boasted that he would kill Phalguna, displaying his jealousy. During Kurukshetra war, he announced several times he would kill both Krishnas (Phalguna and Sri Hari).
बहुत बढ़िया गनात्रा जी।
महाभारत में दोनों बुड्ढे भीष्म पितामह और द्रोणाचार्य एवं कर्ण की दोगलापंती के कारण ही दुर्योधन को हार का सामना करना पड़ा। अंत में दुर्योधन थक हार कर सरोवर में छुप गया।
@@ath5978 No he was as bad as Duryodhana, his character is whitewashed in TV series. He wasn't a Shudra. His foster father was a Kshatriya and third son of King of Kashi, his mother was a Brahmin. They were rich landlords not someone living in a hut. That's a fake narrative of TV serials. He desired Draupadi too so incited Duryodhana to assault her. He was like a one sided lover taking revenge. Yes he was daani etc n had good qualities too but then no one is 💯 black or white in Mahabharat. All have shades of grey, but he was certainly not the victim like he is portrayed.
1.) Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE)
2.) Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana
3.) Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada
4.) At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated.
5.) Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for
Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer Drona parva)
.
Who is better:
1.)Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle.
2.) Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon
3.) Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night
4.) Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna
5.) Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery(fifth one is the ability to give back life)
6.) Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna
7.) Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat
8.) Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself.
.
Now coming to the last mentioned arguments:
1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor (kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection (which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also Karna exchanged Kavach for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not daan, it is a Trade
2.) Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda
interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got
into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna
saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him.
3.) Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his
mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more.
Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona (just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself.
.
Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness,
kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, Arjun entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew
that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in
various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himself to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhagvad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to
increase their rating. Karna was a good
warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma
and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor
gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And
finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak,
walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true
light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...
तुम्ही वाचलेले महाभारत कशावरुन खरं आहे ती original copy आहे का?
pls correct
mam ne galti se 10:44 pe Arjun bol diya Karna ki jagah
bhai tum bhi hmm hmm kr rhe ho
shi se sun lete
Aur edit bhi nahi kia
1.) Virat war: Arjuna singlehandedly defeated all kaurava warriors including Karna (thrice), Bhishma and Drona and destroyed the entire kuru army alone to save the Matsya kingdom (refer Virata Parvam in Authentic Mahabharat eg: BORI CE)
2.) Fight with Gandharvas: Karna was defeated by Gandharva king Chithrasena, captured Duryodhana and Karna fled away. But Arjuna alone defeated Chithrasena and released Duryodhana
3.) Panchal war: Karna was defeated along with other Kauravas by Drupada; Arjun defeated and captured Drupada
4.) At Draupadi Swayamvar: Karna fought with Arjun but was defeated by Arjun and Karna retreated.
5.) Mahabharat war day 14: Arjuna slaughtered the Kaurava army and defeated Karna and Drona while hunting for
Jayadratha. Nobody could stand against him on that day. He destroyed 7 akshauhinis that day (refer Drona parva)
.
Who is better:
1.)Abhimanyu's death: Abhimanyu defeated Karna many times during the war and he was invincible for anyone so he along with 7 other warriors through betrayal jointly attacked him like a coward. But on 17th day Arjun challenged the entire army to protect Karna's son Vrishsena and killed him in front of Karna in one-to-one battle.
2.) Arjuna was ambidextrous: He was the only warrior who could use both right and left hand for using weapon
3.) Arjuna could aim and shoot upto many kilometers even during night
4.) Arjuna was the only warrior to wield the mighty Pashupatastra in dwapara yuga, which could destroy the entire cosmos; the only warrior to fight Lord Shiva and impress him. If you read Kirata parva, Lord Shiva said, that no one except him and lord Vishnu from all the three worlds could defeat Arjuna
5.) Arjuna was the only warrior who knew all the five tatvas of Archery(fifth one is the ability to give back life)
6.) Dhanur Veda, the holy scripture of archery starts by praising lord Shiva, lord Rama and Arjuna
7.) Arjuna singlehandedly killed 30 million Nivatakavachas and Kalakeyas whom even Ravan couldn't defeat
8.) Arjuna was Nara, the partial incarnation of lord Vishnu himself.
.
Now coming to the last mentioned arguments:
1. Indra could have given and equally powerful armor (kavach) to Arjuna as he is also a demigod like Surya. He knew the power of his son but wanted to ensure a fair battle as Karna has a divine protection (which ofcourse, is obtained not because of his skill but as a boon). This would make the battle completely based on skills and weapons and not on boons. Just think, many demons got boons by which they could not be killed easily, eg: Hiranyakashipu, Madhu and Kaitab etc. But does that make them more powerful than lord Vishnu, never... just loopholes to escape death. Also Karna exchanged Kavach for an even more powerful weapon that puts Arjun in more danger. Exchanging one for another is not daan, it is a Trade
2.) Nagastra has many counter weapons like Garudastra and Arjun had around 130 celestial weapons in his arsenal. According to BORI CE Mahabharat, KMG and Mridananda
interpretation of Mahabharat, it was Ashwasena, a snake who lived in Khandava forest in order to take revenge on Arjuna got
into Karna's arrow without Karna's knowledge. It was in this situation Krishna
saved Arjuna. But when Ashwasena came face to face with Arjuna on the same day, Arjun killed him.
3.) Krishna told Arjuna to fire at the time Karna's chariot sunk in soil in order to give respect to curses and make Karna realize his
mistake and to remind him of the situation Abhimanyu was in. Krishna used to praise Karna in front of Arjun to make Arjun more aggressive and vengeful and also for not having any head weight so that he can continue sharping his skills even more.
Also, it is clearly mentioned in Mahabharat that Drona taught Karna along with Kauravas and Pandavas. Yes, Karna was a student of Drona (just google for yourself). But he was always jealous of Arjuna's skills so he decided to study alone under Parashurama. Also Arjun never got anything with ease, he struggled a lot, he never wanted to be better than Karna, but better than himself.
.
Also Arjun was an epitome of humbleness,
kindness and wisdom. He was morally far far greater than anyone else. Remember, it was Karna who ordered the disrobing of Draupadi. For saving the cattle of Brahmins from Thakshak, Arjun entered Draupadi's room to take his bow eventhough he knew
that he would have to go for exile, this shows that he was a selfless hero. Also, Karna surrendered himself to Duryodhana the personification of adharma and took part in
various evil activities but Arjun surrendered himself to Krishna, the supreme lord who gave him the purest of purest the highest knowledge- Bhagvad Gita. Please don't misunderstand me. I am not being biased. I was also a Karna fan, but after studying authentic Mahabharat like BORI CE(most accurate one till known), KMG and Swami Mrudananda interpretation and Srimad Bhagavatham, I got to know the real essence of Mahabharat. Please don't believe in TV serials, they create fake stories to
increase their rating. Karna was a good
warrior no doubt, but he ended up being a good mango gone bad. Pandavas suffered worst but the had complete faith in dharma
and Krishna and followed the right path. But, when society started teasing Karna, he had two ways but he chose the wrong path and got a tragic ending all his skills and valor
gone without any use to the society or nation, just he surrendered everything to Duryodhana...and that is the difference. And
finally, for those who says Arjuna is nothing without Krishna, we all are nothing without Krishna. He is giving us the power to speak,
walk, work and live and without him we are nothing. Krishna was there for everyone including Karna but only Arjun saw the true
light of wisdom of Krishna. It is so sad that we live in a society which considers the presence of the supreme lord as a demerit. If we understand Krishna we understand everything including Arjuna...
भाई मत सुनो चक्कर आ जायेगा
We are listening to her version only, before making any opinion ,everyone should read Mahabharat by oneself.
Khud parke dekhna chahiae.naki duaro ki bast sunna chahiae.
She did not mention about Raja Dhupad and Dronacharya s' equation....
Even Sakunis charecter
Mahabharat is very complicated .
All characters have flaws.
सूर्य पुत्र हमेशा राजा होता है. उसको उसका अधिकार नहीं मिलेगा तो वो युद्ध करेगा तो करण कैसे गलत है.
Karn ke fan comment ko like karo. Karn🏹🏹🏹🏹🏹🎯🏹🏹🏹🏹