@@Wiintbunfortunately your mistaken. Krishna is the god head , and his abode is the highest planetary system of goloko vrindavaen. All other demigods and jiva-atmas are all expansions on Krishna. The Demigods like shiva are jiva-atmas , sending love to shiva , we are all servants of Krishna, to serve Krishna and make him happy... Hare Krishna. All glories to srilla prabupada... Hare Krishna 🙏
So true. When he says that- you show little bit of arrogance and you fall. I got very angry with my child and hit him and soon after that I felt like krishna has left me. I felt guilty and I lost the feeling of protection that I used to have. It took a week for me to come out of this feeling and get back to my prayers. But after showing remorse and regret and apologising to krishna he has taken me back to his fold. I can feel these.
Hare Krishna 🙏🏽 I absolutely loved this pod cast. The host is of course amazingly good and speaker is very knowledgeable and has explained it so beautifully 🙏🏽thank you
TAKE A BOW 🙏🙏HATS OFF TO PUNDIT VINAY JI WHAT AN AMAZING SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCE THIS PODCAST...HARE KRISHNA🙏.PLS DO A PODCAST WITH DUSHYANTH SRIDHAR JI LOOKING FORWARD TO MANG MORE LIKE THESE 🙏
Truest form of Sanskrit exist in the south not in the north. And also there is no definite way to pronounce a name. It changes from language to language, due to changes in anaswara(m). Samkritam: Krishna(ha) Malayalam: Krishna(n) Tamizh: Krishna(r) or Krishna(n) [informal] Telugu: Krishna or Krishn(udu) Kannada: Krishna English: Krishna Hindi: Krishn - (Schwa deletion due to Persian influence) Same for: Samskritam: Rāmāyana(m) Malayalam: Rāmāyana(m) Tamizh: Rāmāyana(m) Telugu: Rāmāyana(m) Kannada: Rāmāyana English: Rāmāyana Hindi: Rāmāyan [again schwa deletion due to Persian influence] One more example, Lord Rama Samskritam: Rāma(ha) Malayalam: Rāma(n) Tamizh: Rāma(r) or Rāma(n) [informal] Telugu: Rāma or Rām(udu) Kannada: Rāma English: Rāma Hindi: Rām (again due to Persian influence the Schwa deletion takes place)
One of the main reasons for Krishna's Avatara was to wipe out the Kshatriya race (barring some dharmic ones). Kshatriyas in the Dwapara were ferocious and fierce warriors. Had they lived on, they would have made the lives of common folks unbearable in the coming "Kalyuga". Of course there is the story of Bhudevi coming to Maha Vishnu crying that the burden on earth has become unbearable and so on but this may just be a metaphor.
19:14 If you see it as a normal human being, you will only think Krishna is a Psycho. He wanted Yudistar to tell lie and cry to his life time for doing a sin but the ultimate knowledge is required to understand that Yudistar himself need not to think he shouldn't say lie. What he is doing is not for himself. He just has to think he is part of the existence of world (Paramathma) and Paramathma always want us to do anything that is good for the wellness of the nature. Rather than being a proof of goodness itself. (Dronacharya knows this when he is asking for the thumb to Ekaleva. He know how much bad name it will bring to him but still did that because he has the knowledge about Bhramam(Paramam) This is a very hard lesson and a huge balance is required to understand else you may also end up being a terrorist or a dictator thinking what you do is what nature wanted. Life is ultimate and the reason why we are here is ultimate.
Beautiful understanding, very well explained and no words to appreciate . More so since Ranveer could not interrupt with his half baked knowledge like how he used to do for Rajasri Nandy and other important guests not allowing them to express what they came for. Tanveer please grow up, this show is not to show your knowledge it I to bring out the bestie others . Vinay could do that excellently.
Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ??
Krishn did not know until 16 yrs for what he has come and what is his essence actually as an avatar. It was his Guru Sandipani who touched him , told him to do tapasya and recall through his consciousness what purpose he has come for since he was born as Human. Such a major part is missed , where is this generation headed to...
@@parvathivaidyanathan6195 tenth cando reads of sons of Kuver who were shameless and nude...under a curse... The story of Yashoda seeing the universe is also transformed , if you read carefully it's the love of the mother who with her best knowledge is relating stars and black space as teeth and hollow of mouth... Srimad Bhagavatam is a Mahakavya or a book of poetry to be read with Ras , swad.
@@ds86496 Not sure if Sadhguru has said this but Srimad Bhagavatam and Vishnu Puran both state about Guru Sandipani who moved knowledge in him mentally... Krishna did sadhna on Govardhan for 6 years until he came back transformed and never played flute again...
All he had to do was to fall at Shiva’s feet who is only God. He would have finished things in 2 minutes. Krishna was a child that Shiva let play. By the way which version of Krishna and Rama are you talking about?
Just for clarity For every ones understanding here Kamsa = Kans, Hence, ppl should use actual name than the fancy English version. Krishn not Krishna Ved vyas = not Vyasa Pandav = not pandavas Vaikunth = not vaikuntha Krodh= not Krodha And so ON, We as indian should understand soft modified version of West. Stop following blindly, be original and proud to be sanatani
I don’t think that it was jaya and vijayas last choice , who will kalki come for? Their should be someone? This kalyuga has happened so many times still none of us are capable of remembering what happened and what will happen, no one knows that how great is the strategy of vishnu bhagwan.
So, let me get this straight so yudishtra gambling his wife and brothers is considered to be on the right side, karna is placed in the bad side for one instance after all his insults throughout his life.
Yudhishthira's reputation is largely preserved because he accepts the consequences of his actions, takes responsibility for his missteps, and spends the rest of his life atoning for this and other mistakes. His genuine commitment to dharma (moral duty) and his humility redeem him in the eyes of many. Karna, on the other hand, is a tragic hero. Though he is immensely skilled, loyal, and generous, Karna's association with Duryodhana and his unwavering loyalty to him are seen as major flaws. He actively participates in humiliating Draupadi after the dice game, and his role in the war includes actions that are seen as dishonorable (such as killing Abhimanyu, a young warrior). Karna's decisions often stem from a deep sense of resentment due to his upbringing and the injustices he faced, but his loyalty to a morally questionable cause (Duryodhana's) tarnishes his legacy. The different societal perceptions of Yudhishthira and Karna come from the moral positions they represent. Yudhishthira's mistakes are seen as moments of personal weakness, while Karna, despite his virtues, is aligned with Duryodhana's adharma (unrighteousness). Thus, Karna's otherwise redeeming qualities are overshadowed by his support for an unjust cause. In essence, while Yudhishthira's single act of gambling Draupadi is considered a moral lapse, his overall adherence to dharma and penance for his mistakes allow him to be seen as a flawed but virtuous leader. Karna, despite his personal virtues, is judged more harshly due to his alliance with Duryodhana and his involvement in morally ambiguous actions throughout the epic.
@@navinnathan7015 Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ???
@@manannaik1341he is shown more powerful than arjuna.. which is an utmost lie... everytime duel happened between arjuna and karna.. even when arjuna had no krishna or his hanuman rath by him, then also he defeated karna...
13:25 Sorry this a very wrong perspective to note. Krishna says to Karna that he had all chances to be on the side of Right. You are telling wrong things. If you say what Karna said is wrong then How come Dhrobathi can discriminate people and reject Karna for his cast. Please understand neither Dhrobathi nor Karna had a peaceful life. There is nothing like Krishna being part of their own (one's own) actions.
Karna is a demon who got a benediction that he can't be killed until someone kills him 1000 times. That's why nara- narayana risis fought with him 999 times and killed him. Finally that very demon took birth as karna n got killed by arjuna.
The interesting thing is that karna also did alot of good deeds like charity and other stuffs, that's because sahashra kavacha (who got defeated 999 times by nara-narayana rishis) asked for refuge to Surya Dev when nara and Narayana where after him,(where Surya Dev kept sahasra kavacha inside him). Surya Dev after a very very long long time, gave sahasra kavacha to kunti who was devoting for a son to Surya Dev. As sahasra kavacha was inside Surya Dev for so many long years, when he got out, he had some good personalities of Aaditya.
In Samskritam, HE is named कृष्णः krishNaH When you address (पुकार्) HIM,you say कृष्ण (krishNa) Note that this is without the : or H This word means that one who is dark. Since Lord KrishnaH was dark in complexion, he was named thus. This is a masculine word. The feminine form of this word is कृष्णा (krishNaa) When you address such a girl, you say कृष्णे (krishNe) In Mahabharat, since Draupadi was dark in complexion, कृष्णा (krishNaa) was the name given to her. In BR Chopra's mahabharatham, you will hear Lord KrishnaH address Draupadi as कृष्णे (krishNe) So, you are right that, an extra "a" changes the masculine (Lord KrishnaH) to feminine (Draupadi) The meaning though, remains the same.. both are dark in complexion. And in Samskritam, you would name him रणवीरः and when addressing him you would call हे रणवीर
No, he's right there is no Krishna it's Krishn and Shukl ... Those who use this are still not able to understand. It seems they hear more and read less the scriptures
In different languages we pronounce differently, in tamil we sat kamsan n krishnan . By finding out these silly things without knowing actuals you are missing the real essence. If you feel you are that knowledgeable you try to givea counter podcast
Half knowledge.. It's Krishna who is God and Krishnaa who is draupadi. Open sanskrit books and make an attempt to read, don't go by how you pronounce in your own language..
The Gita is proof that Kris is not God. Imagine being so powerful and your best friend calls bullshit on your casual request to kill his uncle. If god has to reveal himself with so many words, then clearly he is not the creator
Shocking to me that you did not know who Ugrasena was - that is the problem with education today in India that you probably know the length of Abraham Lincolns beard but you do not even know somebody as important as Kansa's father! What a shocking state of affairs.
@@devarajn8744 Completely agree but I still found it shocking. Live in the US, my daughter is educated here but she still knows who all the main characters in the Mahabharata are! It was not meant as a "negative" comment - but a sad reflection of the education system in India which is not the fault of the host. Hopefully India will come back into its own again - soon! 🙏🏼 JSK
Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ??
@@pratikgoradia6440 Getting their kids from outside sources, Having five husbands are justified In Sanadhan.... That's where the cultural differences arise.
This guy is steeped in knowledge and Bhakti.
A pleasure to listen to him.
I hope you can address him more respectfully instead of saying this guy!
Radhe radhe❤.. ranveer brother, he is a living granth over here. I bow down to him
Hare Krishna so mesmerizing , thank you, explained very well
What a day to come a cross this clip ❤ Just 53 minutes left for Krishna janma 🎉
Krishna is everything.
Shiva is the only Truth and Only God.
@@Wiintbunfortunately your mistaken. Krishna is the god head , and his abode is the highest planetary system of goloko vrindavaen. All other demigods and jiva-atmas are all expansions on Krishna. The Demigods like shiva are jiva-atmas , sending love to shiva , we are all servants of Krishna, to serve Krishna and make him happy... Hare Krishna. All glories to srilla prabupada... Hare Krishna 🙏
So true. When he says that- you show little bit of arrogance and you fall. I got very angry with my child and hit him and soon after that I felt like krishna has left me. I felt guilty and I lost the feeling of protection that I used to have. It took a week for me to come out of this feeling and get back to my prayers. But after showing remorse and regret and apologising to krishna he has taken me back to his fold. I can feel these.
Goosebumps.....goosebumps...goosebumps......tears.....tears......tears......❤❤❤Thank you thankyou thankyou
Wow. What a divine experience through this podcast.
This has been the best clip from a mahabharata segment ever. Gave me so many clearances and foresights
Hare Krishna 🙏🏽
I absolutely loved this pod cast. The host is of course amazingly good and speaker is very knowledgeable and has explained it so beautifully 🙏🏽thank you
I connect to the charioteer part as he is the consciousness that helps me. I get inspiration from Bhagavad Geeta
Radhe Radhe ❤
What a Mind-blowing podcast...so much points to take away.eagerly waiting for many more like this 😊🙏🏻
Radhe Radhe
His English 🙏
What a great video, I love it
beautifully explained by Pundit Vinay Varanasi.
Supreme lord shree Vishnu ❤
So beautifully narrated and makes you feel it deeply. Thank you 🙏🏼 Hare Krishna
Wow just want to say 🙏 lovely explained❤
Amazing!!!!!
TAKE A BOW 🙏🙏HATS OFF TO PUNDIT VINAY JI WHAT AN AMAZING SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCE THIS PODCAST...HARE KRISHNA🙏.PLS DO A PODCAST WITH DUSHYANTH SRIDHAR JI LOOKING FORWARD TO MANG MORE LIKE THESE 🙏
Nice interpretation. Please make more such videos
Super knowledgeable and amazing.
Beautiful to listen to this 🙏
Beautiful podcast
For me it is the best one
Thankyou Ranveer Bhaiya 😊😊
Please do such podcasts in Hindi also. So many people will miss this important podcast. Learnt so much from this one. Need more people like him.
Then go to a hindi channel. We don't want hindi everywhere
awesome work@TRS Clips its needed actually
Wow.. Beautiful.. Jai Shri Krishn ❤🥰
Ranveer, Take a break if you have to absorb what Vinay is talking about. He gave the energy for a lifetime to absorb ❤
love from TRIPURA!!!!!!!!!!
Radhey Radhey 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Truest form of Sanskrit exist in the south not in the north. And also there is no definite way to pronounce a name. It changes from language to language, due to changes in anaswara(m).
Samkritam: Krishna(ha)
Malayalam: Krishna(n)
Tamizh: Krishna(r) or Krishna(n) [informal]
Telugu: Krishna or Krishn(udu)
Kannada: Krishna
English: Krishna
Hindi: Krishn - (Schwa deletion due to Persian influence)
Same for:
Samskritam: Rāmāyana(m)
Malayalam: Rāmāyana(m)
Tamizh: Rāmāyana(m)
Telugu: Rāmāyana(m)
Kannada: Rāmāyana
English: Rāmāyana
Hindi: Rāmāyan [again schwa deletion due to Persian influence]
One more example, Lord Rama
Samskritam: Rāma(ha)
Malayalam: Rāma(n)
Tamizh: Rāma(r) or Rāma(n) [informal]
Telugu: Rāma or Rām(udu)
Kannada: Rāma
English: Rāma
Hindi: Rām (again due to Persian influence the Schwa deletion takes place)
Its Tamil not Tamizh
Absolutely not. Sanskrit pronunciation of words is 100% strict. Every localized regional variation is a corruption of original Sanskrit words.
@@rudra3354 Please ..... It's Tamizh only. It's shown as "Tamil" just to make others understand easier
@@hareeshkrishnaa5642 of course not. It is written in IaST. There is a dot below l. But most of the people ignored it.
Jai shree Radhe krishna 🙏
Unbelievable!❤
Fantastic ❤
Great. Dhanyavadh!
Super one
One of the main reasons for Krishna's Avatara was to wipe out the Kshatriya race (barring some dharmic ones). Kshatriyas in the Dwapara were ferocious and fierce warriors. Had they lived on, they would have made the lives of common folks unbearable in the coming "Kalyuga". Of course there is the story of Bhudevi coming to Maha Vishnu crying that the burden on earth has become unbearable and so on but this may just be a metaphor.
goosebumps 😮
I'm a female, and I'm in love with Kanha, for his charoteer aspect as it shows how to deal with life.
Jai Shree RadhaKrishna❤
Jai Shri Krishna!
Radhe radhe
finally. a person who speaks about Karna's reality.
19:14 If you see it as a normal human being, you will only think Krishna is a Psycho. He wanted Yudistar to tell lie and cry to his life time for doing a sin but the ultimate knowledge is required to understand that Yudistar himself need not to think he shouldn't say lie. What he is doing is not for himself. He just has to think he is part of the existence of world (Paramathma) and Paramathma always want us to do anything that is good for the wellness of the nature. Rather than being a proof of goodness itself. (Dronacharya knows this when he is asking for the thumb to Ekaleva. He know how much bad name it will bring to him but still did that because he has the knowledge about Bhramam(Paramam)
This is a very hard lesson and a huge balance is required to understand else you may also end up being a terrorist or a dictator thinking what you do is what nature wanted. Life is ultimate and the reason why we are here is ultimate.
The Mahabharata TV show doesn't do justice to all these concepts about pitting all the evils against the dharma.
Beautiful understanding, very well explained and no words to appreciate . More so since Ranveer could not interrupt with his half baked knowledge like how he used to do for Rajasri Nandy and other important guests not allowing them to express what they came for. Tanveer please grow up, this show is not to show your knowledge it I to bring out the bestie others . Vinay could do that excellently.
I don't think we should make such comments. Yes he does interrupt but he is making such beautiful podcasts. We should appreciate this
Plz repost the vedio about krishna which is of 2hrs appox plzz
Why is the full video private? Can open it 😮
😢yes , why
Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances
Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible
Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ??
Krishn did not know until 16 yrs for what he has come and what is his essence actually as an avatar.
It was his Guru Sandipani who touched him , told him to do tapasya and recall through his consciousness what purpose he has come for since he was born as Human.
Such a major part is missed , where is this generation headed to...
He knew HiS life’s purpose. Read SRIMAD Bhagavatam. Tenth Skanda ..tenth Canto. When he shows his Universal Form to Yashoda.
sadhguru's ganja story??
read real text bhagavatam rather than listening from an hinduism distorter like jaggi..
@@parvathivaidyanathan6195 tenth cando reads of sons of Kuver who were shameless and nude...under a curse...
The story of Yashoda seeing the universe is also transformed , if you read carefully it's the love of the mother who with her best knowledge is relating stars and black space as teeth and hollow of mouth...
Srimad Bhagavatam is a Mahakavya or a book of poetry to be read with Ras , swad.
@@ds86496 Not sure if Sadhguru has said this but Srimad Bhagavatam and Vishnu Puran both state about Guru Sandipani who moved knowledge in him mentally...
Krishna did sadhna on Govardhan for 6 years until he came back transformed and never played flute again...
Makhan bhot khaaliya
Murli bhot bajali
Leelaye bhot karli
Ab wo karya karo jiske lie prithvi pe aaye ho>>>>>>>>>>>>
can you get him to talk about the govardhan leela and the nathdwara temple
Right at timestamp @01:57 , Ranveer asks 'who's ugrasena!' :).. ROFL
❣
All he had to do was to fall at Shiva’s feet who is only God. He would have finished things in 2 minutes.
Krishna was a child that Shiva let play.
By the way which version of Krishna and Rama are you talking about?
Can anybody help me with finding Bhagavat Katha in English/kannada .
Just for clarity For every ones understanding here Kamsa = Kans,
Hence, ppl should use actual name than the fancy English version.
Krishn not Krishna
Ved vyas = not Vyasa
Pandav = not pandavas
Vaikunth = not vaikuntha
Krodh= not Krodha
And so ON, We as indian should understand soft modified version of West. Stop following blindly, be original and proud to be sanatani
Plz repost the full vedio...i have watched half of the vedio n now madly m searching for it.. Plz post it again.. We need to knie about krishna
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
I don’t think that it was jaya and vijayas last choice , who will kalki come for? Their should be someone? This kalyuga has happened so many times still none of us are capable of remembering what happened and what will happen, no one knows that how great is the strategy of vishnu bhagwan.
🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏🙏👌👌👌
So, let me get this straight so yudishtra gambling his wife and brothers is considered to be on the right side, karna is placed in the bad side for one instance after all his insults throughout his life.
Yudhishthira's reputation is largely preserved because he accepts the consequences of his actions, takes responsibility for his missteps, and spends the rest of his life atoning for this and other mistakes. His genuine commitment to dharma (moral duty) and his humility redeem him in the eyes of many.
Karna, on the other hand, is a tragic hero. Though he is immensely skilled, loyal, and generous, Karna's association with Duryodhana and his unwavering loyalty to him are seen as major flaws. He actively participates in humiliating Draupadi after the dice game, and his role in the war includes actions that are seen as dishonorable (such as killing Abhimanyu, a young warrior). Karna's decisions often stem from a deep sense of resentment due to his upbringing and the injustices he faced, but his loyalty to a morally questionable cause (Duryodhana's) tarnishes his legacy.
The different societal perceptions of Yudhishthira and Karna come from the moral positions they represent. Yudhishthira's mistakes are seen as moments of personal weakness, while Karna, despite his virtues, is aligned with Duryodhana's adharma (unrighteousness). Thus, Karna's otherwise redeeming qualities are overshadowed by his support for an unjust cause.
In essence, while Yudhishthira's single act of gambling Draupadi is considered a moral lapse, his overall adherence to dharma and penance for his mistakes allow him to be seen as a flawed but virtuous leader. Karna, despite his personal virtues, is judged more harshly due to his alliance with Duryodhana and his involvement in morally ambiguous actions throughout the epic.
@@navinnathan7015
Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances
Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible
Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ???
I hope kalki director watches this video. Who is trying to glorify karna
How did he glorify?
Lol let him do whatever he wants if you have a problem you can just avoid watching it
I think that since the movie didnt comment on the morality of karna, just saying that he was a great warrior who could match arjun is okay.
Karna is victim card player in today's bharata lot of victim card players available do adharma
@@manannaik1341he is shown more powerful than arjuna.. which is an utmost lie... everytime duel happened between arjuna and karna.. even when arjuna had no krishna or his hanuman rath by him, then also he defeated karna...
13:25 Sorry this a very wrong perspective to note. Krishna says to Karna that he had all chances to be on the side of Right. You are telling wrong things. If you say what Karna said is wrong then How come Dhrobathi can discriminate people and reject Karna for his cast.
Please understand neither Dhrobathi nor Karna had a peaceful life. There is nothing like Krishna being part of their own (one's own) actions.
Mantram , podcastum , idiotum , karnam , Ranveeram …
Why are the rishis always cursing people?🤣
It's the fastest way to remove the sin committed by the cursed.
@@ChidVanhi well said
No they r not. Its just all the time they have cursed have had huge repercussions. Hence highlighted. Statistically ur statement would be wrong.
ranveer why did u , kept the full podcast video in private , then what the purpose of interview , very very pathetic
Yeah , yesterday I saw 1 hr and I thought to see it today but it was not there 😭 I am upset 😔
Me too😢
bacha ke rakho channel kahi ye bhi hack na ho jaye
😂Kans not Kamsaa
Learn how to read Sanskrit. In Sanskrit it is Kaṁsa
Karna is a demon who got a benediction that he can't be killed until someone kills him 1000 times. That's why nara- narayana risis fought with him 999 times and killed him. Finally that very demon took birth as karna n got killed by arjuna.
The interesting thing is that karna also did alot of good deeds like charity and other stuffs, that's because sahashra kavacha (who got defeated 999 times by nara-narayana rishis) asked for refuge to Surya Dev when nara and Narayana where after him,(where Surya Dev kept sahasra kavacha inside him). Surya Dev after a very very long long time, gave sahasra kavacha to kunti who was devoting for a son to Surya Dev. As sahasra kavacha was inside Surya Dev for so many long years, when he got out, he had some good personalities of Aaditya.
There is enough evidence of the Pandavas being evil.
Why they call kim KRISHNAAA and not Krishn . Without A . His actual name is Krishn and not Krishn . How about calling Ranveera instead of Ranveer 😂
The very meaning changes when you add extra alphabet . No ?
Just because you pronounce it as Krishn it doesn't become his name. Check any Samskrutam texts for the actual pronunciation of Sri Krishna's name
In south he is called as Krishna , krishnan etc
In Samskritam,
HE is named कृष्णः krishNaH
When you address (पुकार्) HIM,you say कृष्ण (krishNa)
Note that this is without the : or H
This word means that one who is dark.
Since Lord KrishnaH was dark in complexion, he was named thus.
This is a masculine word.
The feminine form of this word is कृष्णा (krishNaa)
When you address such a girl, you say कृष्णे (krishNe)
In Mahabharat, since Draupadi was dark in complexion, कृष्णा (krishNaa) was the name given to her.
In BR Chopra's mahabharatham, you will hear Lord KrishnaH address Draupadi as कृष्णे (krishNe)
So, you are right that, an extra "a" changes the masculine (Lord KrishnaH) to feminine (Draupadi)
The meaning though, remains the same.. both are dark in complexion.
And in Samskritam, you would name him रणवीरः and when addressing him you would call हे रणवीर
Similarly, शिवः (shivaH) is the 3 eyed Lord Shiva.
शिवा (shivaa) is Parvatii.
Wtf is कंसा...it's कंस, it's क्रिष्ण......what has happened to this generation, this is modern day slavery
My friend he's using sanskrutam pronounciation,we add a in Sanskrit.
No, he's right there is no Krishna it's Krishn and Shukl ...
Those who use this are still not able to understand.
It seems they hear more and read less the scriptures
Didn't u read my comment😅@@shredder2cop
In different languages we pronounce differently, in tamil we sat kamsan n krishnan . By finding out these silly things without knowing actuals you are missing the real essence. If you feel you are that knowledgeable you try to givea counter podcast
@@santhirajagopal9371ur right,btw hi
KRISHNA = DRAPADI , KRISHN = GOD
RAMA = Dont know who , it is RAM
GOPALA = Dont know who it is GOPAL
Half knowledge.. It's Krishna who is God and Krishnaa who is draupadi. Open sanskrit books and make an attempt to read, don't go by how you pronounce in your own language..
Learn how to read Sanskrit. In ORIGINAL Sanskrit language, it is Krishna, Rāma, Kaṁsa, Mahābhārataṁ, Rāmāyaṇaṁ
The Gita is proof that Kris is not God. Imagine being so powerful and your best friend calls bullshit on your casual request to kill his uncle. If god has to reveal himself with so many words, then clearly he is not the creator
Shocking to me that you did not know who Ugrasena was - that is the problem with education today in India that you probably know the length of Abraham Lincolns beard but you do not even know somebody as important as Kansa's father! What a shocking state of affairs.
Let's not be so nasty. It's ok. He is doing a great job hosting such speakers. Let's appreciate the positives
@@devarajn8744 Completely agree but I still found it shocking. Live in the US, my daughter is educated here but she still knows who all the main characters in the Mahabharata are! It was not meant as a "negative" comment - but a sad reflection of the education system in India which is not the fault of the host. Hopefully India will come back into its own again - soon! 🙏🏼 JSK
पटर पटर कर रहा । नाम ढंग से लेने नहीं आते । कंस को कमसा और कृष्ण को कृष्णा कह रहा है।
Krishna ki jai❤
Prabhu ki lila❤
Mahabharat criticises villains for unethical deeds and glorify heros for doing the same. That's the beauty of Sanadhan..
Though we can't judge but can't take sides until full knowledge of the circumstances
Which action causes which reaction and what should be the true extent of the reaction against the previous action it is something that is incomprehensible
Karn incited kauravas for draupadi vastraharan against the insult meted to him during swayamvar while duryodhana faced insult from draupadi during his visit to Khandprast. Draupadi was born because King Drupad wanted vegnance ..... so how to comprehend what leads to what and finally what was dharma and adharma ??
@@pratikgoradia6440 Getting their kids from outside sources, Having five husbands are justified
In Sanadhan.... That's where the cultural differences arise.
Radhe Radhe