Bossk Green - swudb.com/deck/IWqyYBaPjGLd Become a Patron - patreon.com/VeiledShot Use my TCGPLAYER Link! - tcgplayer.pxf.io/9gYPK0 👍Like what you see? SUB! 👍- bit.ly/3VAFHfY 👊Join my Discord! 👊 - bit.ly/3NMDib7 ⚔ Follow my Twitter ⚔ - bit.ly/3TmUo1p
A video format I’d love to see is you playing community submitted decks for the first time, learning the deck and finding the creators synergies almost as you play. Then end the video with a review and notes
I get that the healing is nice from the starviper, but with bounties/client actions/leader actions it feels like taking initiative will be a rarity, where you can get alot of value out of untapping punishing one
Was playing with a Bossk deck last night, but mine is more bounty hunter focussed. Thanks mainly to Toro Calican equipped with armed to the teeth and wielding a darksaber, I did 18 damage to my opponents base on turn 4! Will definitely sneak the client into my deck after watching this vid though! 😁
Same. But I've been focusing on using ecl on Jango or Trandoshan to get a 4 cost 6/5 or a 5 cost 7/5. If you have a bounty on board it just removes anything your opponent can get out that early save tarkin leader. Seeing this though, I also think I'll be slipping the client in
That's what I do in my Bossk. Plus guild target. 9/10 times, drawing Bossk plus guild target plus BHQ kills their turn 2 drop and puts me up 2 units to 0 going into turn 2
It's funny how my natural instinct has been to go towards building two main counter decks, 1 specifically for counter-Boba, 1 specifically for counter-sabine. Feels only right to be focusing on building decks that disrupt the popular meta ones more so than working to refine tester decks or meta.
The rules do not state that you cannot play multiple copies of a unique card. The rules state that you cannot control multiple copies. So what happens rules wise, is that you play one, play the second(resolving any on played abilities), immediately defeat a copy (resolving on defeat abilities) and then repeat for the third copy.
That first match wanted me to rip my hair out, you could've OB the walker and killed both units and still had the walker around to hit for 8 and heal, plus you would've been able to use the combo again next turn if they didnt kill it
@VeiledShotSWU that's just how I am lol, I don't like to leave anything to chance, I'm a control player and I'd rather clear board, heal, and keep all my units on the field than let any glimmer of hope shine through 😅
Apparently yes. Mismatched aspect does not count toward the “cost” of the card for other card effects. And then the rest of the text of the card effect is to make the Client “free”
The main part is the "play it for free". Both Vader and BHQ let you search for 3 cost or less and play for free. In this case it only cares about the unit's printed cost. Aspect penalty affects the amount needed to pay the cost of playing an out of aspect card, but doesn't change the printed cost of the card. For example, triple dark raid doesn't let you play a 5 cost or less for free, but rather lets you play a card for 5 less of the total (so you must account for aspect penalty).
46:56 when double claiming BHQ with Bossk, shouldn't it be search 10, then search another 10? It seems like Karabast may be bugged because the 9 remaining cards after the first pick stayed up
30:38 is Overwhelm bugged on Karabast? I believe Wrecker should have done 5 to base here. In the first game I believe some overwhelm from K2SO was missed too
Bossk Green - swudb.com/deck/IWqyYBaPjGLd
Become a Patron - patreon.com/VeiledShot
Use my TCGPLAYER Link! - tcgplayer.pxf.io/9gYPK0
👍Like what you see? SUB! 👍- bit.ly/3VAFHfY
👊Join my Discord! 👊 - bit.ly/3NMDib7
⚔ Follow my Twitter ⚔ - bit.ly/3TmUo1p
A video format I’d love to see is you playing community submitted decks for the first time, learning the deck and finding the creators synergies almost as you play.
Then end the video with a review and notes
I get that the healing is nice from the starviper, but with bounties/client actions/leader actions it feels like taking initiative will be a rarity, where you can get alot of value out of untapping punishing one
Yeah. I feel the same way. I feel like Bossk doesn't have initiative very often.
@@JKSSubstandardwhat would you swap in ?
Was playing with a Bossk deck last night, but mine is more bounty hunter focussed. Thanks mainly to Toro Calican equipped with armed to the teeth and wielding a darksaber, I did 18 damage to my opponents base on turn 4! Will definitely sneak the client into my deck after watching this vid though! 😁
Same. But I've been focusing on using ecl on Jango or Trandoshan to get a 4 cost 6/5 or a 5 cost 7/5. If you have a bounty on board it just removes anything your opponent can get out that early save tarkin leader. Seeing this though, I also think I'll be slipping the client in
@@JKSSubstandard Likewise, ECL with Jango or Tradoshan or even Krrsantan is so useful that I'm now trying to sneak a timely intervention in too!
Any suggestions on substitute if I don't have Vader? Was thinking Maul for ambush maybe.
Having a hard time beating any of the meta decks besides Sabine with this deck. Real hard lol
With all the bounties, why not run Dengar instead of Death Star Stormtrooper?
That's what I do in my Bossk. Plus guild target. 9/10 times, drawing Bossk plus guild target plus BHQ kills their turn 2 drop and puts me up 2 units to 0 going into turn 2
It's funny how my natural instinct has been to go towards building two main counter decks, 1 specifically for counter-Boba, 1 specifically for counter-sabine. Feels only right to be focusing on building decks that disrupt the popular meta ones more so than working to refine tester decks or meta.
You have some swudb lists?
How is he able to play double salacious crumb if crumb is unique?
The rules do not state that you cannot play multiple copies of a unique card. The rules state that you cannot control multiple copies. So what happens rules wise, is that you play one, play the second(resolving any on played abilities), immediately defeat a copy (resolving on defeat abilities) and then repeat for the third copy.
That first match wanted me to rip my hair out, you could've OB the walker and killed both units and still had the walker around to hit for 8 and heal, plus you would've been able to use the combo again next turn if they didnt kill it
Seeing as the game was by far over I'm surprised that play made you want to rip your hair out, haha.
@VeiledShotSWU that's just how I am lol, I don't like to leave anything to chance, I'm a control player and I'd rather clear board, heal, and keep all my units on the field than let any glimmer of hope shine through 😅
Can someone explain how he is able to play the client for 3 and ignore the aspect penalty do Vader ability and bounties just let that happen?
Apparently yes. Mismatched aspect does not count toward the “cost” of the card for other card effects. And then the rest of the text of the card effect is to make the Client “free”
Yes, just like Uwing.
The main part is the "play it for free". Both Vader and BHQ let you search for 3 cost or less and play for free. In this case it only cares about the unit's printed cost. Aspect penalty affects the amount needed to pay the cost of playing an out of aspect card, but doesn't change the printed cost of the card. For example, triple dark raid doesn't let you play a 5 cost or less for free, but rather lets you play a card for 5 less of the total (so you must account for aspect penalty).
46:56 when double claiming BHQ with Bossk, shouldn't it be search 10, then search another 10? It seems like Karabast may be bugged because the 9 remaining cards after the first pick stayed up
Yes
How do u beat a deck that heals constantly?
Keep the pressure up, or use Wolffe if playing red.
Wolffe sideboard would go hard
30:38 is Overwhelm bugged on Karabast? I believe Wrecker should have done 5 to base here. In the first game I believe some overwhelm from K2SO was missed too
lmao this deck is hilarious
I have the feeling I could give you 5 packs and you would beat most folks constructed decks.. :)
First comment?