Feel free to jump to any part of the video! 00:00 Start 02:44 Why I bought LX100 05:03 Pros of LX100 07:28 Cons of LX100 11:13 LX100 vs Mirrorless M43 Camera 13:13 Conclusion
i bought the LX100 II as a backup camera to my Fuji X-T3. I wanted something more portable than the Fuji X100 with some zoom range. I do not experience the focusing issue you describe with the LX100. I also bought a Megagear cover from B&H camera that fits like a glove and gives you a little extra grip. This protects the body and the top of the cover snaps off for shooting.. Occasionally I use a can of pressurized air to clear dust from around the camera body. So far so good. I'm very pleased with it. Thanks for the review
Wow! I am a xt3 owner and was looking for this camera as a side camera to tae with me while commuting. Are you happy with your results? I got told that it is a waste to buy this because i have a "phone". But I hate taking pictures with phones
@@seed157 I love the LX100. We just went to Europe in December. I brought the X-T3 and two small lenses and the LX100. 90% of the time, I grabbed the LX100. If you shoot RAW with it, the files have plenty of info for good post processing. Great colors and very versatile.
I have been using the LX100 for 7 years now, and just replaced it with the Leica D-LUX 7, which has the same base as the LX100 II. I think that this camera is more useful than you think, even for professional use it is really good compared to other compacts. The sensor in the LX100 II is the same as the 20 MP sensor in the GX8. I mostly use the camera for situations where I can or do not want to carry my big Lumix S1, and where my phone is not good enough. Professional shoots count too, my LX100 has done very well. I mostly agree with your pros and cons. The most important pro for me are image quality and operation, the most important con is the lack of a microphone jack and the lack of weather sealing. My camera has dust on the sensor as well, very annoying. I plan to fix it myself, it is difficult but should not be rocket science. The LX100 II (and my D-LUX 7) will still have the dust problem. It is a shame that Panasonic killed off the LX series, there will not be a successor...
@@ardhitorizky5290 I think the D-LUX 7 offers better colors, looks and resale value, while the LX100 II offers more value for money overall. If you can find either second hand for a good price, you will be happy with any of them.
Kill? Hence Leica will kill the Lux camera lineup too even Panasonic has new MFT sensor now? If I'm going to get Panasonic HC-X1500 camcorder for video, should I get Sony A7RV with 16-35mm F4 PZ and 70-200mm F4 OSS G MACRO II with 2X tele or RX100 VII/VIIA or D Lux 7 for photo? I do like to explore ultramacro and is there such adaptor or way for RX100 and D Lux 7? I will use for personal use like document life, travel, TH-cam and personal works and projects. Does it make sense to get a smaller D Lux 7 camera that can't put in pocket and still need to carry with a bag or hang on neck and not just get A7RV which still not that big and have better grip, EVF and performance?
Thanks for the video! I’ve seldom noticed any focusing problems, the LX100 is snappy and accurate for photography. I have a compact leather case designed for the LX100 which makes it very easy to bring the camera along on the shoulder. I suppose it will minimize the potential problem with dust entering the camera interior. Removing the camera from the leather case is done in two seconds. I also have Nikon and Fujifilm cameras (APS-C format) with prime lenses, but unless you make very large prints the sharpness is comparable.
I have the Leica version, the D lux typ 109. It's a great little camera and fun to use. I take it to cars and coffee or family outings and it produces nice images despite being older now. Get compliments every time I carry it!
Nice overview, thanks. I'm interested in the LX 100 for taking cycling and camping, but the dust issue rules it out for me. I've had that problem with my Ricoh GR, and it's ridiculously expensive to get it cleaned, and really quite frustrating. Not being able to stop down beyond f4 really isn't a satisfactory solution for me. To answer your question, I really want to get my GF-1 into regular use again. I took most of my favourite photos with that camera.
Graham thank you for the comment! Yes the dust issue is a shame. I currently use the LX100 for my carry around camera, and for more intense photography/video needs I will use my GX8 and G85. Cheers! 😊
Amazing you reviewed this I've been looking for a carry everywhere camera for city/street photog. My g9 is a little to big. I've heard of the dust issue. I don't think you can self clean ? Does it have a sensor clean option that helps knock the dust ?
Hello Steve! This LX100 is a good solution for city/street photography in my experience! Unfortunately it doesn't have strong enough sensor cleaning mechanism, I tried cleaning the sensor using vacuum cleaner on the front element of the lens, but it doesn't work as well as I thought, and I'm afraid it could damage the lens parts in the long run. As long as you don't shoot anything smaller than f/4 the dust won't be noticeable.
Hello, I shoot RAW then I edit in Lightroom. Most of the time I just add a bit of shadow (+20ish), reduce a bit of highlight (-10 ish), add a bit of white, reduce a bit of black, add just a touch of clarity, and do a bit of noise reduction if needed. Hope this helps!
I do have a gimbal and I did use it occasionally with the LX100, but it's way too much hassle to travel with a gimbal. I still prefer the DJI Pocket 3 for smooth steady shots, and use the LX100 for additional B rolls that doesn't require too much movement.
Its time to retire my LX100 and need your advice for best replacement... I just like to take quality travel photos and I was happy so many years with the LX100. So I need something similar in size/weight, same zoom, and blurry background.... what do you recommend
Honestly, the LX100 is one of a kind, I still use mine right now because it's just a very convenient camera to have with a comparable image quality to my other M4/3 cameras.
Hi Gary! I really like your video. You lead me into the M43 world. I want to buy my first camera, and I really like Lumix lx100, can I buy this camera from you?
Great video! So glad we cross paths, because since last week I started looking for a good camera for Vlogging, and for my B roll. One with good stabilization without using a gimbal, and has good weather seal, and probably with a monitor side screen or something like that. But one that's not over the $2,000 price range. Presently, I have been using the GoPro Hero 9 black, but I cannot zoom and with low light outdoor, not as bright and crisp. And my DJI OM 4 stabilizer has some issues too. I just watch this video from start to finish, and I will be watching more. Thank you.
Thank you very much for the comment! I have a few recommendations for your need, I am currently using my Panasonic G85, it is weather sealed, has good in body stabilization, and it will perform very well for both vlogging and B roll. It is way under $2000, and there are many good lenses that are also more affordable. I recommend the Panasonic 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 if you need the ultimate zoom range, but if you need low light then you can consider Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8. You are very welcome, and once again thank you 😊
@@Gary_W thank you so much for this much needed information. Since you are well equip with the good camera gear, you will definitely get amazing photos and videos of the Aurora Borealis in Iceland.
If I'm going to get Panasonic HC-X1500 camcorder for video, should I get Sony A7RV with 16-35mm F4 PZ and 70-200mm F4 OSS G MACRO II with 2X tele or RX100 VII/VIIA or D Lux 7 for photo? I do like to explore ultramacro and is there such adaptor or way for RX100 and D Lux 7? I will use for personal use like document life, travel, TH-cam and personal works and projects. Does it make sense to get a smaller D Lux 7 camera that can't put in pocket and still need to carry with a bag or hang on neck and not just get A7RV which still not that big and have better grip, EVF and performance?
All of what you mentioned are valid options, they might even replace the HC-X1500 for video if you don't need the ultra-telephoto zoom, because frankly speaking they will produce more "cinematic" footages compared to the HC-X1500. I always opt for smaller but capable camera for my everyday camera, so I personally think either the RX100 or D Lux 7 will do the job while also do great for video as well. However, the A7RV will definitely give you the flexibility of interchangeable lens should you need it, but it's much larger than either RX100 or D Lux 7.
Hi Gary, some questions for you, I'm currently using Fujifilm X-A7 with the XC 15-45mm kit lens+hood as my main camera (which is not so compact and portable), and looking for seconday camera that's compact and portable for me to bring inside my crossbody sling bag, is the Lumix LX100 still good for 2023 onwards? since i found the used LX100 around my budget, is it compact enough that i can use it to replace my smartphone to take photo during travels, and how's the image quality performs versus nowdays smartphone computational photography? not to be used for something professional, just for some instagram feeds use
ISpeaking of image quality really think the LX100 is still a good camera in 2023, definitely I really enjoy the ability to change settings easily on the camera. The camera is quite lightweight and small, and it performed really well for travel photography. However I want to emphasize is the "tactility" of using a real camera, the LX100 will give you that tactility, not just good result. Smartphones may give you good photos with those computational photography, but the actual process of doing photography i.e setting the camera, choosing the right aperture, shutter speed, focusing, framing the shots carefully, is much more enjoyable if you are using a dedicated camera.
@@Gary_W Thanks for your feedback Gary, the process is enjoyable part like you said, im now on hunt for either the Lumix 100 or some similiar compact camera 🤓
Hi there. Which would you recommend? Second hand G16 at 148usd or lx100 at 222usd or sony rx100m4 at 333usd? Have a olympus epl2 with manual lens but need too much of tweaking. wanna get something more versatile for short trip
Thanks, great informative video on the LX100. I saw it going ‘cheap’ and looked a great portable / pocketable walkabout camera, but after watching yr video I decided against it… I’ve never liked moving / extending zooms anyway. Thanks mate, ‘hv sub’d
I wouldn't say phone is better or LX100 is better, I will say they are great but for different purposes. If you need good image quality and easy to access manual controls in a form of a compact camera, then LX100 is a really good choice, but if you value convenience and just want to point and shoot then phones will be better. Speaking of image quality alone, LX100 will provide you with better "actual" image quality both in terms of photo and video compared to phone, but phones with computational photography capabilities can give you "enhanced" image quality that will look good also i.e. night mode on Pixel or Samsung, portrait mode on iPhone, etc.
@@Gary_W but all cellphones at night produce horrible glare & green reflection dots because of there lenses….making most dedicated cameras almost 100% better than cellphones in this regard
There has been enormous progress done in mobile photography over the past one year. I'm not sure if cropped micro4/3 is even worth it anymore. Top phones that use 1-inch sensor with multiple exposure image stacking is coming at micro 4/3 real soon.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. I agree if we are strictly speaking in terms of image quality. However, from the perspective of the actual process of doing photography, the "enjoyment" factor is much higher on dedicated camera vs on smartphone. The tactility, the form factor, the ergonomics, the ability to set manual settings on a dedicated camera can't be easily replicated using a smartphone.
@@Gary_W You're right. The joy of using a real camera is different and cannot be replicated. If I am on a holiday, I would prefer a real camera too. But for every day use, I simply don't have the time to post process camera's photos. A smart phone would be a lot more convenient.
@davidletterboyz I agree with what you said, for everyday casual stuff, I also don't like to bother with offloading the images from a dedicated camera, so I prefer smartphone for that purpose too.
![TEEDEE TADA - DIAMOND NARAKORN X LEGO LYKN [Special Dance Performance]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QgtZedFeumA/mqdefault.jpg)
Feel free to jump to any part of the video!
00:00 Start
02:44 Why I bought LX100
05:03 Pros of LX100
07:28 Cons of LX100
11:13 LX100 vs Mirrorless M43 Camera
13:13 Conclusion
i bought the LX100 II as a backup camera to my Fuji X-T3. I wanted something more portable than the Fuji X100 with some zoom range. I do not experience the focusing issue you describe with the LX100. I also bought a Megagear cover from B&H camera that fits like a glove and gives you a little extra grip. This protects the body and the top of the cover snaps off for shooting.. Occasionally I use a can of pressurized air to clear dust from around the camera body. So far so good. I'm very pleased with it. Thanks for the review
Wow! I am a xt3 owner and was looking for this camera as a side camera to tae with me while commuting. Are you happy with your results? I got told that it is a waste to buy this because i have a "phone". But I hate taking pictures with phones
@@seed157 I love the LX100. We just went to Europe in December. I brought the X-T3 and two small lenses and the LX100. 90% of the time, I grabbed the LX100. If you shoot RAW with it, the files have plenty of info for good post processing. Great colors and very versatile.
@@seed157I also have an xt3 and I am watching this video to get it as a second camera😂😂
I have been using the LX100 for 7 years now, and just replaced it with the Leica D-LUX 7, which has the same base as the LX100 II. I think that this camera is more useful than you think, even for professional use it is really good compared to other compacts. The sensor in the LX100 II is the same as the 20 MP sensor in the GX8. I mostly use the camera for situations where I can or do not want to carry my big Lumix S1, and where my phone is not good enough. Professional shoots count too, my LX100 has done very well.
I mostly agree with your pros and cons. The most important pro for me are image quality and operation, the most important con is the lack of a microphone jack and the lack of weather sealing.
My camera has dust on the sensor as well, very annoying. I plan to fix it myself, it is difficult but should not be rocket science. The LX100 II (and my D-LUX 7) will still have the dust problem.
It is a shame that Panasonic killed off the LX series, there will not be a successor...
Thank you for sharing and for the comment. Indeed the LX100 is a great camera and it has really nice benefits!
From your experience wich one is better LX100 or leica d-lux 7?
@@ardhitorizky5290 I think the D-LUX 7 offers better colors, looks and resale value, while the LX100 II offers more value for money overall. If you can find either second hand for a good price, you will be happy with any of them.
Kill? Hence Leica will kill the Lux camera lineup too even Panasonic has new MFT sensor now?
If I'm going to get Panasonic HC-X1500 camcorder for video, should I get Sony A7RV with 16-35mm F4 PZ and 70-200mm F4 OSS G MACRO II with 2X tele or RX100 VII/VIIA or D Lux 7 for photo? I do like to explore ultramacro and is there such adaptor or way for RX100 and D Lux 7? I will use for personal use like document life, travel, TH-cam and personal works and projects. Does it make sense to get a smaller D Lux 7 camera that can't put in pocket and still need to carry with a bag or hang on neck and not just get A7RV which still not that big and have better grip, EVF and performance?
so, how do you take out dust from your LX100 or DLUX 7? Is it just using a blower?
Thanks for the video! I’ve seldom noticed any focusing problems, the LX100 is snappy and accurate for photography. I have a compact leather case designed for the LX100 which makes it very easy to bring the camera along on the shoulder. I suppose it will minimize the potential problem with dust entering the camera interior. Removing the camera from the leather case is done in two seconds. I also have Nikon and Fujifilm cameras (APS-C format) with prime lenses, but unless you make very large prints the sharpness is comparable.
dude! Thanks for the autofocus macro tip, used this camera for a while and just used to manual focus most of the time, will try!
The electronic viewfinder is genius
eyyyy a pedal geek and camera geek in one. subscribed!
I have the Leica version, the D lux typ 109. It's a great little camera and fun to use. I take it to cars and coffee or family outings and it produces nice images despite being older now. Get compliments every time I carry it!
Yes, I remember the Leica version of the LX100, that is a sweet camera! Thank you for sharing 😊
@@Gary_W yes it is! Produces some nice colors that's for sure
Nice overview, thanks. I'm interested in the LX 100 for taking cycling and camping, but the dust issue rules it out for me. I've had that problem with my Ricoh GR, and it's ridiculously expensive to get it cleaned, and really quite frustrating. Not being able to stop down beyond f4 really isn't a satisfactory solution for me. To answer your question, I really want to get my GF-1 into regular use again. I took most of my favourite photos with that camera.
Graham thank you for the comment! Yes the dust issue is a shame. I currently use the LX100 for my carry around camera, and for more intense photography/video needs I will use my GX8 and G85. Cheers! 😊
I also rediscovered my Samsung EX-1 camera.
Amazing you reviewed this I've been looking for a carry everywhere camera for city/street photog. My g9 is a little to big. I've heard of the dust issue. I don't think you can self clean ? Does it have a sensor clean option that helps knock the dust ?
Hello Steve! This LX100 is a good solution for city/street photography in my experience! Unfortunately it doesn't have strong enough sensor cleaning mechanism, I tried cleaning the sensor using vacuum cleaner on the front element of the lens, but it doesn't work as well as I thought, and I'm afraid it could damage the lens parts in the long run. As long as you don't shoot anything smaller than f/4 the dust won't be noticeable.
how did you edit those pictures ?
they look amazing
are they straight out of the camera ?
Hello, I shoot RAW then I edit in Lightroom. Most of the time I just add a bit of shadow (+20ish), reduce a bit of highlight (-10 ish), add a bit of white, reduce a bit of black, add just a touch of clarity, and do a bit of noise reduction if needed. Hope this helps!
I've been using this camera for 10 years and never had a dust problem, I'm a little messy too, lol
Good to hear, mine kept getting worse, but I can still get around the dust problem so far.
i have both the LX5 and the GX7 with the Leica Lenses. i just grab the LX5 more often. hoping Panasonic will release a new LX
You should consider purchasing a gimbal camera for LX100. They have become an excellent action camera and are better than the DJI Pocket 3.
I do have a gimbal and I did use it occasionally with the LX100, but it's way too much hassle to travel with a gimbal. I still prefer the DJI Pocket 3 for smooth steady shots, and use the LX100 for additional B rolls that doesn't require too much movement.
Its time to retire my LX100 and need your advice for best replacement... I just like to take quality travel photos and I was happy so many years with the LX100.
So I need something similar in size/weight, same zoom, and blurry background.... what do you recommend
Honestly, the LX100 is one of a kind, I still use mine right now because it's just a very convenient camera to have with a comparable image quality to my other M4/3 cameras.
Hi Gary! I really like your video. You lead me into the M43 world. I want to buy my first camera, and I really like Lumix lx100, can I buy this camera from you?
Unfortunately it is not for sale, thank you!
@@Gary_W 😀😀😀
Love this camera, I wish it had more bokeh tho
I'm new and enjoy already...🙂
Great video! So glad we cross paths, because since last week I started looking for a good camera for Vlogging, and for my B roll. One with good stabilization without using a gimbal, and has good weather seal, and probably with a monitor side screen or something like that. But one that's not over the $2,000 price range. Presently, I have been using the GoPro Hero 9 black, but I cannot zoom and with low light outdoor, not as bright and crisp. And my DJI OM 4 stabilizer has some issues too. I just watch this video from start to finish, and I will be watching more. Thank you.
Thank you very much for the comment! I have a few recommendations for your need, I am currently using my Panasonic G85, it is weather sealed, has good in body stabilization, and it will perform very well for both vlogging and B roll. It is way under $2000, and there are many good lenses that are also more affordable. I recommend the Panasonic 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 if you need the ultimate zoom range, but if you need low light then you can consider Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8. You are very welcome, and once again thank you 😊
@@Gary_W thank you so much for this much needed information. Since you are well equip with the good camera gear, you will definitely get amazing photos and videos of the Aurora Borealis in Iceland.
Does this camera support memory cards larger than 64GB? For example, 128 GB or 256 GB.
If I'm going to get Panasonic HC-X1500 camcorder for video, should I get Sony A7RV with 16-35mm F4 PZ and 70-200mm F4 OSS G MACRO II with 2X tele or RX100 VII/VIIA or D Lux 7 for photo? I do like to explore ultramacro and is there such adaptor or way for RX100 and D Lux 7? I will use for personal use like document life, travel, TH-cam and personal works and projects. Does it make sense to get a smaller D Lux 7 camera that can't put in pocket and still need to carry with a bag or hang on neck and not just get A7RV which still not that big and have better grip, EVF and performance?
All of what you mentioned are valid options, they might even replace the HC-X1500 for video if you don't need the ultra-telephoto zoom, because frankly speaking they will produce more "cinematic" footages compared to the HC-X1500. I always opt for smaller but capable camera for my everyday camera, so I personally think either the RX100 or D Lux 7 will do the job while also do great for video as well. However, the A7RV will definitely give you the flexibility of interchangeable lens should you need it, but it's much larger than either RX100 or D Lux 7.
THANKS BROTHER FOR THIS VIDEO
You are very welcome!
Hi Gary, some questions for you, I'm currently using Fujifilm X-A7 with the XC 15-45mm kit lens+hood as my main camera (which is not so compact and portable), and looking for seconday camera that's compact and portable for me to bring inside my crossbody sling bag, is the Lumix LX100 still good for 2023 onwards? since i found the used LX100 around my budget, is it compact enough that i can use it to replace my smartphone to take photo during travels, and how's the image quality performs versus nowdays smartphone computational photography? not to be used for something professional, just for some instagram feeds use
ISpeaking of image quality really think the LX100 is still a good camera in 2023, definitely I really enjoy the ability to change settings easily on the camera. The camera is quite lightweight and small, and it performed really well for travel photography.
However I want to emphasize is the "tactility" of using a real camera, the LX100 will give you that tactility, not just good result. Smartphones may give you good photos with those computational photography, but the actual process of doing photography i.e setting the camera, choosing the right aperture, shutter speed, focusing, framing the shots carefully, is much more enjoyable if you are using a dedicated camera.
@@Gary_W Thanks for your feedback Gary, the process is enjoyable part like you said, im now on hunt for either the Lumix 100 or some similiar compact camera 🤓
Hi there. Which would you recommend? Second hand G16 at 148usd or lx100 at 222usd or sony rx100m4 at 333usd? Have a olympus epl2 with manual lens but need too much of tweaking. wanna get something more versatile for short trip
G16 if you need longer zoom, LX100 if you want more blurry background, RX100 sits in between LX100 and G16.
Is 12 megapixels enough? My only reservation.
More than enough for everyday needs for sure. Unless you need to print big. 😊
I regret selling mine. It was so fast to grab and get family video or photos.
It definitely is an amazing little camera!
Thanks, great informative video on the LX100. I saw it going ‘cheap’ and looked a great portable / pocketable walkabout camera, but after watching yr video I decided against it… I’ve never liked moving / extending zooms anyway. Thanks mate, ‘hv sub’d
Thank you William for the comment, yes the extending zoom is a bit of a weakness I must say. Cheers!
Very nice video. Thank you and keep on going.
Thank you very much for the kind comment!
Is lx100 better than the latest phone cameras ? what would you say ?
I wouldn't say phone is better or LX100 is better, I will say they are great but for different purposes. If you need good image quality and easy to access manual controls in a form of a compact camera, then LX100 is a really good choice, but if you value convenience and just want to point and shoot then phones will be better.
Speaking of image quality alone, LX100 will provide you with better "actual" image quality both in terms of photo and video compared to phone, but phones with computational photography capabilities can give you "enhanced" image quality that will look good also i.e. night mode on Pixel or Samsung, portrait mode on iPhone, etc.
@@Gary_W but all cellphones at night produce horrible glare & green reflection dots because of there lenses….making most dedicated cameras almost 100% better than cellphones in this regard
the sincronicity speed is up to 1/1000 sec. ?
Yes it does if you use mechanical/leaf shutter, not the electronic shutter.
There has been enormous progress done in mobile photography over the past one year. I'm not sure if cropped micro4/3 is even worth it anymore. Top phones that use 1-inch sensor with multiple exposure image stacking is coming at micro 4/3 real soon.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. I agree if we are strictly speaking in terms of image quality. However, from the perspective of the actual process of doing photography, the "enjoyment" factor is much higher on dedicated camera vs on smartphone. The tactility, the form factor, the ergonomics, the ability to set manual settings on a dedicated camera can't be easily replicated using a smartphone.
@@Gary_W You're right. The joy of using a real camera is different and cannot be replicated. If I am on a holiday, I would prefer a real camera too. But for every day use, I simply don't have the time to post process camera's photos. A smart phone would be a lot more convenient.
@davidletterboyz I agree with what you said, for everyday casual stuff, I also don't like to bother with offloading the images from a dedicated camera, so I prefer smartphone for that purpose too.
Shame cant purchase them now anywhere
There is the newer LX100II, or the Leica D Lux 8 but it's much more expensive compared to the original LX100
@@Gary_W again cant purchase them anymore, difficult in uk to get hold of one, got myself Sony a6500 instead
@mpw2081 enjoy the a6500, I used a6400, the older version of the 6500, many years ago in a project. Seems like a solid camera. Cheers 👍👍
Gary have you ever seen an ibanez js3 around?
Sorry I have never seen a JS3 before in real life. It's not so easy to find high-end Ibanez here, both new or used.
Is lx100 support electronic shutter?
Yes it does have electronic shutter mode
ial biginner i wante camera for content TH-cam.ho is better lx100 or lx15
Both are great choices, LX100 has better manual control, LX15 is easier if you don't need manual control. Image quality not too different.
@@Gary_W thnx lot for u request,i wante lumix for vedio not pic i dont care about manual bur for me the qualite for vedio plz chose me 1 lol .thnx lot
Never sell it! Put it out to pasture. Like an old horse.
agak medhok ya
😅