Christian Longo I’m not surprised tbh I’m glad Colin left his podcast is SO much better kf just hires their friends and chucks them on any podcast, so what they don’t actually do a good job their friends why not
24:00 Jill and carlos are actually much more fleshed out than leon and claire. What do you know about leon other than he’s a rookie cop and claire is chris sister? Jill’s apartment section alone in the beginning shows about jill much more than we ever got about leon or claire. The developing relationship also between jill and carlos was great and showed personality more than any cutscene for claire or leon in remake.
@@MysticMayne I thought that's why it's one of the greatest games. Everything re4 did, games still do. It still looks good and is still more repayable than most games released today
I find it difficult to play highly dated games w/ out nostalgia goggles. Some games age insanely well (Castlevania: SotN), while others- it's ok to leave those fond/biased memories in the past.
RE3 was always more action focused than RE2, it was a part of the original game so its not suprising that the remake is more action focused too. RE3 was also intended to be a side game during most of its development, Code Veronica is actually the proper sequel to RE2 so if they remake that game then you guys will probabaly like that more.
@@returnfreedom He's talking about the original RE3 not the remake. Nemesis was meant to be a side game and Code Veronica was the proper sequel. This was back in 1999-2000.
I don't really understand where Blessing is coming from considering I've played the original RE2 and RE3. I don't think anyone who knew Nemesis will be surprised by this remake. It's never been as amazing as RE2, and it's always been a bit more action focused and less robust as a whole. Plus, we've already had the huge overhaul on RE2 remake, so nobody should have expected much of a change from that game last year to this one now. It's less scary because it isn't trying to be as scary, it's that simple. If you're new to the series this is bound to be jarring.
Plenty of people think 3 is better. Only issue is it's shorter. 2 was my least favorite of the first 4 games. Didn't have many puzzles, Mr X was never that scary. G was okay but Nemesis was cooler. The second half was great with final forms and areas. But 3 was like nothing but the last half stretched out. Was great. Plus hunters better than lickers. Remake however, improved EVERYTHING making it the best overall even though It'll never be as unique as fixed camera. And so it's not quite as special. And 3 had to do way more but didn't. That's the issue.
Davide Borsatto but all four of these people should at the very least be able to provide coherent arguments and opinions is their fucking job like it’s unbelievable
Bless is awful as he's trying to hard and trying to flesh out a 5 min talk on something he could have done with a shirt paragraph and he gets lost in waht he's trying ito say. Imo. His game experience is poor and I'm sure he'll improve but I'm not feeling it atm
Dooka // Agreed. Blessing definitely feels like a “fake it till you make it” kinda guy. He has very surface level knowledge about gaming and is clearly hired for the sake of diversity instead of quality. Tim is just Tim. Sadly got used to him contradicting himself, a lot of Nintendo gamers are like that. I kinda shut my brain off most of the times that Tim talks, it doesn’t always work but you gotta do what you can.
Turan X I’m right there with you my dude kinda funny never puts people on a podcast because of their expertise it’s literally because there just friends, it’s frustrating the lack of people on podcast that actually know what to do. I would watch screencast if Kevin wasn’t hosting because he’s just not cut out for it with his cringy views on literally everything and Tim who compares everything to Fast n Furious and has zero charisma he’s so boring I’m sorry none of his jokes land
Why are y'all upset that REmake3 is more action than REmake2? That's literally the point lol. Jill is supposed to be the bad ass super cop compared to the nobodies that Clair and Leon were in re2.
As a huge RE fan and happy to say the original RE3:Nemesis is my favorite of the series, seeing the game early as I can't help myself when it comes to spoilers well... It looks great and I'm interested in seeing how I'll feel playing it myself, at the same time I am a little disappointed with what did get cut. Otherwise I can't wait for Friday to start playing this!
Because a lot of people feel that Resident Evil shouldnt be a more action focused series. Its should be a slow burn about trying to survive, not running ariund like a superhero. Thats why they scaled it back in RE7 after RE6.
Re2 had two different sides to play. That alone was more than 10hrs together. Also, A shit ton of replayability plus 4th survivor and Tofu. So yes, it was beefy.
@@IceKicker18 Yeah, most of the scenarios are the same. I liked RE2 a lot, but there really isnt much there. Didnt think it was a goty at all but I enjoyed it. Don't think I'll have a better or worse experience, but a second scenario would've been nice. Or they could've made the single campaign twice as long
Brett Austin yeah but there’s been many successful games in the past there were about 5 - 7 hours long. I got a copy early and the game is actually GREAT!! It’s just a little more action focus and that’s mainly due to the fact that the original RE3 was more action focused than the original RE2.
So i've been seeing a lot of hub bub about the length of Resident Evil 3 Remake, here's my opinion. Shorter Game length ≠ less value even if its $60. Longer Game length ≠ more value even if its $60.
quality over quantity, i loved re2 because for 12 hours it was a top quallity game all the way through, where as say something like AC Odyssey i enjoyed alot at first but grew to hate because of its padding and forced longevity. Tired of every game trying to be a 100 hour mega open world rpg
It depends really. Just so you can understand my point of view, where I live a minimum wage is 1200$ but because of taxes a game costs 250$. See where I'm at? I don't think RE3 is a problem because I'd replay a lot like RE2 but ignoring how short a game is isn't smart in some cases. I tend to over-analyse games, sometimes I spend a week going back and forth and gathering info on a game to know if it's really worth it. I want to spend on two games right now but there are 5 that I'm interested in. Nioh 2 (already got this one), Doom Eternal, RE3, Persona Royal and FFVIIR. Given the amount of games coming out and the amount of free time I have (because of the quarantine) I decided to wait a bit on Doom Eternal and went with Nioh 2, I love both games but Nioh 2 is more bang for my buck. Now I'm between RE3, Persona 5 Royal and FFVII. I have no doubt that RE3 is awesome but if I replay it 8 times it still doesn't compare to the amount of content P5 and FF has. If I look at RE3 and it's developers with empathy I see how it's a 60 dollar game but if I look at it as a consumer/gamer it's a bit too much for what it is. If there were absolutely no games that interest me releasing I'd definitely pull the trigger on it. I know I'll regret the purchase when I buy it and and when I finish the game after 6 hours even knowing that I'll be replaying it a lot.
The issue isnt neccesarily that its short but it feels like its missing content. All classic RE games are short but they dont feel like they're missing something.
I think its amazing, liked it just as much as Resident Evil 2 Remake. I've never played the og versions of either and people have said there's some new and cut content from RE3R.
The original RE3 was intended to be a spin off, but was fleshed out into a full sequel. The original RE2 had like 5 times as much content as RE3. But even the RE2 remake was truncated from its original version. No B campaigns. Very few Raccoon City street environments. Including Mr. X as a prominent part of both campaigns distracted for William Birkin's role in the story line. So when you reduce the Resident Evil 3 content, you have a reduced version of what was always sort of the third Resident Evil 2 campaign, and it can't sustain a $60 release. Labyrinthian level design (the mansion, the police station) is truly the essence of the Resident Evil franchise, and it is what distinguishes it from other game series. This is what made the Resident Evil 2 remake special. The reason Mr. X works better than Nemesis, is that he's stalking you through that environment, and you have to be strategic about what path you take to avoid him and other enemies. Resident Evil 3 was always more linear (not as many interconnected hallways etc) but it maintained the randomness of the fights by having a set of variable actions the player could take that would trigger a Nemesis appearance. People who recall late 90s gaming, will remember that shortly after Resident Evil 3, Silent Hill 2 introduced its own spin on the stalker horror trope in the form of Pyramid Head. Despite not having tank controls and being fully 3D, Silent Hill has never been given the expectation of playing like Devil May Cry or Gears of War. In fact people were effusive of th4 Hideo Kojima Silent Hills demo that consisted solely of a character walking down a hallway. It was Clocktower that pioneered the stalker trope and survival horror, via a slasher villain with giant hedge trimmers. Clocktower didn't have any combat whatsoever, let alone tank controls vs action mechanics. The entire mechanic was evasion, paired with haunted house story telling. This same gameplay paradigm was explored more recently in Amnesia on the PC, where it was received as some kind of artistic innovation. But in fact, survival horror has always had its roots in Adventure Games, not in action titles. People have been unable to appreciate survival horror, because so much analysis of games is steeped in a zero-sum mentality of, what is 'the best' game mechanic, or what are the 'correct' controls. This habitual mentality of critics homogenizes video games as a whole. it fails to appreciate the intricacies of design that make any experience more than the sum if its parts. We are able to appreciate how iconic the nurses are in Silent Hill games for instance. But we don't translate that recognition to a broader analysis of criteria for "quality" in general. A Resident Evil 4 remake would not work because it has none of this DNA that makes a Resident Evil game greater than the sum of its parts. It is just a shooter. Really it was a late gen technical showpiece for the Gamecube, that betrayed loyal fans of the franchise, and was quickly supplanted by the likes of Gears of War and Uncharted, and so forth. Not because those franchises are better than Resident Evil. But because they're more sophisticated action games. They are more advanced software. If you don't engage a higher level of analysis, all games will ever be is a series of technical advancements.
@@buttertoast1146 re2 4 different stories? Claire and leon are the same and I know you have the two mini challenges with hunk/ tofu but they ain't stories
The reason RE3make wasn't as expanded or content-rich as RE2 remake is because, Blessing's hunch is 100% correct, they were developed concurrently. They began development at roughly the same time with the intention of releasing them fairly close together.Just look at the credits, As Imran said, a satellite studio is mostly responsible for RE3, and the team was way smaller than RE2's (which was developed internally).
Re3 remake was never going to be better than Remake 2, because the original wasn't better than 2 either. Here's hoping we get Code Veronica after re8. Since CV is the true sequel to 2.
@@TheNaughtyBiscotti I think we'd get a CV remake before 4. Dont think they'd let all that Claire hype, built from re2 remake, go to waste on a really good story for her. It would sell a ton. That said, we'll probably get re8 next Also doing cv after 8 would give re4 more time to age and more of a want for a remake.
From a pure gameplay perspective and not counting story, I am one of the gamers, who actually felt the original RE3 was better than RE2. My biggest issue with the original RE2 was how the boss battles and enemy variety were not implemented in a way that I found challenging, for the variety of weapons offered. For me, this was a major problem that kept me from viewing RE2 as a personal Survival Horror classic, although I did think that it had a great story, atmosphere, and campaign structure. When I played RE3, I felt like I was experiencing the intended gameplay of RE2, if the basic controls were touched up a bit, the boss battles in general were tougher, Mr. X was no longer a pushover, and the enemy variety forced me to be more strategic with the different weapons. The more action-oriented nature was incidental to me. My only points of criticism for RE3’s gameplay were the “dodgy” dodge system, lack of a non-Nemesis boss besides the two Gravediggers, and me not enjoying Mercenaries as much as other players did. But once the RE2 Remake was released, for all its shortcomings and cut content, it did fix the original RE2’s biggest problem for me. Now, depending on how problematic the RE3 Remake’s cuts are, I might end up enjoying the RE2 Remake more than the new RE3.
I wish you guys would try out showing gameplay footage under you all with your 4 cameras on top while talking about a game. You could even just have it in a small box in the corner or in the center or something. It's so much more engaging and helpful for those of us who watch the vods of the podcast. The co-optional podcast did this, dropped frames does this, roundtable did this, as well as others and it is so much more engaging and helpful to the 4 people just sitting talking format you guys have always done. Even just showing it for a minute is better than not at all. I've commented this before, and I think it's something the vod dudes and ladies would love.
32:00 RE3 is primarily a 1P game just like RE2. RE2 now goes on sale for $20 normally after a year of being out. Early adopters pay full or near full price, then the deep sale cuts come sooner than many of games would. RE2 had no DLC expansions that drove up the cost BTW, just cosmetics.
The whole RE2/RE3 is better comes down to nostalgia and which one did you play first. I played RE3 first and I am MUCH more pumped on RE3 than i was with 2. Don’t get me wrong, i love both but i feel like i like RE3 more than others because that’s the first Resident Evil i ever played back in the day. I think that has a lot to do with it.
Same I comepletely see where you are coming from, I played 2 first and it’s my favorite game of all time and I was super pumped, I like the original three and I’m looking forward to 3 remake but I’m not super excited because In my opinion I think that 3 is nowhere as good as 2 and I never thought that a remake of 3 would be better then 2.
I feel thats how it is with all RE games. Like I dont think 4 is as good of a game as people say because RE2 is the gold standard for an RE game, in my opinion, because it was the first one I really invested time into.
He's outta place at KF imo. He's like a regular gaming dude that I would hang out with like Tim, but Tim is usually relagated to hosting lol. We need C-Dawg back or Fran on everyday
This guy sticks out like a sore thumb and his complaints don't even make any sense, ane that goes for everybody else also. The game is more or less the same as Resident Evil 2 what more could you want.
@@melko1408 what's happened to fran? KF has really fallen imo, still love the E3 reactions and predictions stuff but lately they read the article out you've already read like 2 days before and they don't go into the gaming topic enough.
Except that's now how switching over to different engines work. You don't just port a game over, dial up the graphics and call it a day. Lmao. Just about everything would have to be redone. As it's so outdated, probably a large portion of the programming as well
@@tiernanstevens117 I know it's not about flicking a switch and the ports done but like blue point did with shadow . Even if it takes 3/4 years for resi 4 in this new engine would be worth it
as someone who has RE4 as one of his favorite games ever, I am okay with you losing your shit. LOL. I'm kinda kidding, i wouldn't be mad but while i have no attachment to code veronica, i consider the dreamcast an abomination, and RE 4 is clearly superior i would like a remake of Veronica. My last sentence is slightly long but i wanted to get my jabs in on Veronica and Dreamcast (yes I know there was a ps2 version later)
@@boochtron RE4 is a phenomenal game and one of the best games ever made, but I'm willing to say Code Veronica is a better Resident Evil game if that makes sense.
My only criticism is what they removed. They shouldn't have cut anything, major mess up. Perhaps there are easter eggs but why reduce memorable plot points to just that?
Its a little longer than RE3r given you are playing it normally. Most RE games can technically be beaten in 2 or 3 hours so it depends. But Re2r technically does have the B scenerio with a different character and different story/cutscenes, the 4th survivor, tofu survivor, and the ghost survivors.
I’m a year late to the game, but I got 8 hours first play through. I also picked the game up on ps5 for $20 lol. But I was constantly impressed by the presentation & story mostly but had a blast playing this one. Sometimes even more than re2 remake
I gotta disagree heavily with KF on this one. As someone who never played the original, RE3 was excellent. It's excellent in its own way compared to RE2, but still excellent. I think like all things it's all about expectation. I expected an RE2 that was more frenetic, open, and action-oriented... And that's exactly what we got. It's obviously going to use the same mechanics and UI as RE2 bevause it's literally the same time frame. RE2 and RE3 are happening in virtually the same environments and same events. Its basically like the other side of RE2 imo and I loved that. Going to the mansion as Carlos and literally making the hole I used to get into the hallway with the S.T.A.R.S. office was awesome. The setpieces with Nemisis were incredible and the openness of Racoon City was fun to roam around. Jill kicked ass and Carlos, while relatively one note, served his purpose. I really don't get some of these criticisms. "I didn't care about the characters because I needed more back-story", yea well it's the 3rd freaking game, Jill's bsckstory has its own damn game, go play that then you can care. "The game is too short, lacks content, and isn't worth 60 bucks", oh yea because RE2 is soooo much longer right? I love RE2 and have played through all the campaigns multiple times, it's not that long. If you combine both stories and add up what's actually new you'd probably get a game that's a bit longer than RE3 overall. But let's break that down shall we... The sewer area is straight up not that fun, and mansion is most of the game. Comparatively, RE3 feels more varied and "globe-trotting" if you will. As Jill I felt like I was exploring most of Raccoon City rather than just RPD. Oh and don't come at me with 4th survivor and other survivor modes bevause those were just glorified shooting galleries that were incredibly frustrating due to abundance of enemies and lack of checkpoints. Both games are great in their own ways, RE3 was exactly what it was supposed to be so love it, or hate it, what were you expecting?
Wish they fucked off with Resistance and just made a Carlos scenario separately tbh. Resistance will be played for a month tops and people will move on. Or better yet, a Outbreak remake.
It does upset me that they didnt really grasp that RE3 original is more action style than any other RE game. And yet they complained about it but contradicted themselves. My complaints are yes it's short as fuck, I wish they wouldve kept the graveyard in this new one and improved on it. Also it feels like DLC because it feels like you thrown into a game that you're suppose to care about these people and we do but NEW Guys to RE dont because they have no idea about Jill's backstory because it hasnt come out within the last 5 years. It feels like you're thrown into the middle of something but you don't know what that something is.
I think the problem here is burnout.. They are saying it's short but RE2make was just as short...my brother finished that shit in one sitting.... I think it's the fact that just a year has passed so RE2MAKE is still fresh in everyone's mind and RE3make kept most of what made RE2 good.. And people expected a bigger change.. For them to say RE3 isn't worth 60 bucks but RE2 is..... is pretty stupid because RE2 was just as short... That whole Sewer section in RE2 was fucking trash in my opinion, I hated it
Sewer is trash but at least RE2 has different campaigns and side stories. If there's no free dlc coming for 3 and they focus all on that bad multiplayer mode then yes it's a far inferior game
@@Blitzburgh17 RE3 was always inferior to RE2.. But not bad... As for the different campaigns sure but aside from a few different outcomes it's almost the identical playthrough.
As they are saying we know the story of re2 remake and now re3 but theres missing sumthin. a remake of RE1 could make an end to this Series and mayb a REzero for make the “new story” makes sense. Bc everythin in the remakes change a bit or alot in the story.
He meant in the game itself, not just the series. Like he mentions he barely knows anything about Nikoli or Carlos and they're first introduced in RE3.
Both RE2 original and RE3 original are better than the new ones. There's much more content in both the originals. What the fuck is Tim getting on with? They did NOT add more at all.
just like Tim wants the bezel to be smaller in the Switch, i too want the bezel to be smaller for this Gamescast xD, i get the Orioto background is going and all , maybe theres a different way
What is the reason they didnt remake RE1, regarding new players who have no idea what Jill's background is and this game does kind've feel like it was thrown in here and story wise as well like to the fact that you should know more of what's going on. Like why is Jill so fucked up in the intro psychologically? And then throws you into the game that strays away from that. It's a shame because we all know Jill is the OG of the series and I wish they would've remade Re1 and made this like a Lost Legacy dlc of it. Nemmy should be more like Mr. X too. Which is a letdown.
WTF is going on? I haven't watched a KF TH-cam video in a while(podcasts only) and I come back and see Bless with a fucked up hairline and Imran is bold 😔
you felt powerful in resident evil 3 play on the hardest difficulty but anyway re3 was always a action based survival horror resident evil was never meant to be scary the fixed camera and tank controls and music sound effects made the game scary lol
@tjrage6168 The context is they were complaining about it, you said that's how it's suppose to be because of the original, and I said that's not an excuse, they could have made it better
I mean RE3 is RE2 just from jill's perspective, so it would do the same. I can't knock it for that plus it's the 3rd in the series, you should know who jill is.
My first run through Sekiro took about 30 hours but now I can beat it in 5 hours does that make it a bsd game?? No, and and also Mr. X only really pursues you in the first third of the game and scripted sequences in the end so how can you bash Re3 for the same thing?? Also my biggest criticism with Re2 was the major lack of different enemy types which Re3 doesn't have that same issue at all!!! Not to mention it's a better looking AND playing game than Re2 which is insanity!!! Love both games for different reasons though, both are great. Also think Re7 is a better HORROR game than 2 or 3 just my opinion!!!
Please like most people can beat Sekiro in 5 hours. This game is 5 hours first try from an average gamer. I am sure it's amazing but it's short and no defending that
Sekiro took most people 20 hours to beat it but if you literally master the combat and memorize most enemey attack animations you can beat it in 5 hours. Also have to know which items to use at certain times, not to mention knowing where to go to progress the story. You try to beat Sekiro and get the platnium trophy and complete it in 5 hours lmfao. RE7 is a great game played normally but VR cranks it up to ten. I'm not hating on RE2 I just beat Leon's campaign in one sitting so chill.
@@TheNightWolf-WildCraft can't speak on vr that's different and not how most played. Can't compare as 2 ain't vr. Still wouldn't say that's the average playtime of Sekiro
I think RE7 holds up well normally too but I prefer the gameplay and style of RE2 or RE3 but the baker plantation is a great setting and the Bakers were interesting antagonist more so than Mr. X or G Birkin. The dlc for RE7 is so much better than 2 it's not even close it was a ripoff of Ethan must die in third person and a bunch of shitty new enememy types except the paleheads I liked those.
it's a shame none of these guys have played the original. i respect their opinions and i can see where their coming from, but it feels like they were looking for a brand spanking new game when that's not what RE3 was originally? i think they put a lot of stake in how amazing RE2 remake was but i have my own theory about that. Remake 2 wasn't this amazing new experience, it was a return to something from the 90's that worked well but the industry just decided not to make any more of. It was a faithful remake and the amazing reviews it got weren't because it was new, they were because generally we have forgotten how good survival horror was back then. RE3 remake just seems like the exact same thing but because we've already experienced the return to form, its coming off as underwhelming. It seems like exactly what i want from the RE3 remake tbh.
are you new or didn't watch the video? Tim has played all the original RE games (3 he didn't finish but played most of) Imran played all of them to completion. so don't say NONE of them. also are we going to pretend like the original RE 3 was some kinda of great game? cause it wasn't
@@buttertoast1146 not so much laziness, the devs work hard, but on the publishing side this was some tactical business bs. Makes sense why it was planned originally as dlc for re2 remake
So it seems like it really is RE3, it was always a smaller game and it never interested me that much. It seems way short for $60 and I have no interest in the MP portion so I can wait them out on the price.
releasing RE every year would be a massive mistake imo. They need to give the series time to breathe. 2 years per game would be ideal with a switch between remake and new titles. So maybe RE8 next, then RE4 remake, RE9 etc. If they continue with first person that would mean only getting a simillar game once every 4 years
My only complaint of RE2 remake is that it was only 12-13 hours.. this being 6 hours and none of the other add on stuff is a BIG bummer to me. Gamexplain said they beat it in 4 1/2 hours...I can’t pay 60$ for that. If they do a RE4 and it under 10 hours that would suck.. for me at least
News flash everyone, RE2remake is also linear, you have to get certain items at certain times, also that game was also short idk why people pretend like that game was some 60 hour rpg
Re3 is the little brother that will never live up to its older brothers accolades. It's lacking novelty. Much like the annualized assassins creed games did.
@@jean-alexandrethibault3892 You didn't do the second scenario? RE2 is made to feel long because they put you in the constant feeling of being cautious. RE3 is action oriented with ammo management. Minor differences that can feel massive.
@@jean-alexandrethibault3892 The second scenario has different scenes and characters you meet. If you play the game from the beginning with the opposite character. The dialogue you have with Marvin and how you react to stuff you find is different.
Blessing just constantly talks shit, no idea how he works in the industry ‘never played the original RE3, so I’m just treating it is a sequel to RE2’ wow..
Animal crossing has 1 save file so if a family member wants to play they need to buy another 300$ switch for the 2nd save file. These mindless idiots playing animal crossing never mention this which is why it's getting 10/10s proving the Nintendo bias these man children have.
God... Blessing says so much nonsense he can't even keep up with it in a 1 hour talk session. Keeps contradicting himself over & over again. You drunk bro? Lol
@Visal Ky "35 hour game" oh you poor thing... First time buying a square enix game? They lie about that shit ALL the time. They get the worst player in the world to play the game from start to finish- then add 20 hours to however long it took them.
Re2make = x gonna give it to ya
Re3make = just for a bit il give it to ya
instablaster.
KF: RE 3 remake, it's good but not as good as RE 2 remake.
Everyone 12 years ago: RE 3 Nemesis, its good but not as good as RE2.
Precisely
Everyone except me
more like 20 years ago
Shouldn't a remake just be overall a better experience, though? That just sounds like a copout.
@@frickthefuckoff what's the copout?
Blessing Adeoye JR complaining he isnt familiar w characters in a trilogy he didnt play the original of is peak Blessing Adeoye JR😂😂😂
GUAPZILLA watch out they might delete this comment cause it isn’t complimenting them
@@beggar_nugs I double Dog Dare Em!!!!
Christian Longo I’m not surprised tbh I’m glad Colin left his podcast is SO much better kf just hires their friends and chucks them on any podcast, so what they don’t actually do a good job their friends why not
Dooka Bro...quality of podcasts aside...Colin is 1000% worse at taking criticism lol.
Nelson Hamilton he literally did a whole podcast dedicated to things he has got wrong
24:00 Jill and carlos are actually much more fleshed out than leon and claire.
What do you know about leon other than he’s a rookie cop and claire is chris sister? Jill’s apartment section alone in the beginning shows about jill much more than we ever got about leon or claire.
The developing relationship also between jill and carlos was great and showed personality more than any cutscene for claire or leon in remake.
'I stopped playing re4 because it didn't age well.' that's what Blessing said. I can't...
I'm starting to not be able to take what he says Seriously anymore
Andreas Kleanthous RE4 doesn’t age
@@MysticMayne I thought that's why it's one of the greatest games. Everything re4 did, games still do. It still looks good and is still more repayable than most games released today
He even discredited the Wii version with motion controls lol when that was one of the best additions to that game they ever did
Yeah i dont like his video game opinions.
Review starts at 6:10
Thank you kind sir.
You da real MVP
Personally, I hope Capcom releases an RE Classics package that is the original RE 1-3 in one game.
I wouldn't play that with all 3 remade. No point. Especially original 1. I'll never play that again
I would rather get added content and a fixed camera mode
I love that idea.
I find it difficult to play highly dated games w/ out nostalgia goggles. Some games age insanely well (Castlevania: SotN), while others- it's ok to leave those fond/biased memories in the past.
Code Veronica should be the next title to get the remake treatment... it has that horror feeling like RE and RE2.🙏🏼🤞
I like the twist where Alex was Alexia as well, never seen that in a game before. It’ll be amazing in the RE engine.
RE3 was always more action focused than RE2, it was a part of the original game so its not suprising that the remake is more action focused too. RE3 was also intended to be a side game during most of its development, Code Veronica is actually the proper sequel to RE2 so if they remake that game then you guys will probabaly like that more.
Dude Code Veronica remake would be a completely new ball park and I am so down for it! Billy! Lol
Yeah a side game costing 60 dollars with a multiplayer no one wanted.
@@returnfreedom He's talking about the original RE3 not the remake. Nemesis was meant to be a side game and Code Veronica was the proper sequel. This was back in 1999-2000.
I don't really understand where Blessing is coming from considering I've played the original RE2 and RE3. I don't think anyone who knew Nemesis will be surprised by this remake. It's never been as amazing as RE2, and it's always been a bit more action focused and less robust as a whole. Plus, we've already had the huge overhaul on RE2 remake, so nobody should have expected much of a change from that game last year to this one now. It's less scary because it isn't trying to be as scary, it's that simple. If you're new to the series this is bound to be jarring.
We dont really listen to blessing
Plenty of people think 3 is better. Only issue is it's shorter. 2 was my least favorite of the first 4 games. Didn't have many puzzles, Mr X was never that scary. G was okay but Nemesis was cooler. The second half was great with final forms and areas. But 3 was like nothing but the last half stretched out. Was great. Plus hunters better than lickers. Remake however, improved EVERYTHING making it the best overall even though It'll never be as unique as fixed camera. And so it's not quite as special. And 3 had to do way more but didn't. That's the issue.
Imran and Greg are the only ones here that can actually collect their thoughts and provide an opinion that they stick to and don’t contradict later
To be fair they are the two actual jounalists in there, and you can see it.
Davide Borsatto but all four of these people should at the very least be able to provide coherent arguments and opinions is their fucking job like it’s unbelievable
Bless is awful as he's trying to hard and trying to flesh out a 5 min talk on something he could have done with a shirt paragraph and he gets lost in waht he's trying ito say. Imo.
His game experience is poor and I'm sure he'll improve but I'm not feeling it atm
Dooka // Agreed. Blessing definitely feels like a “fake it till you make it” kinda guy. He has very surface level knowledge about gaming and is clearly hired for the sake of diversity instead of quality. Tim is just Tim. Sadly got used to him contradicting himself, a lot of Nintendo gamers are like that. I kinda shut my brain off most of the times that Tim talks, it doesn’t always work but you gotta do what you can.
Turan X I’m right there with you my dude kinda funny never puts people on a podcast because of their expertise it’s literally because there just friends, it’s frustrating the lack of people on podcast that actually know what to do. I would watch screencast if Kevin wasn’t hosting because he’s just not cut out for it with his cringy views on literally everything and Tim who compares everything to Fast n Furious and has zero charisma he’s so boring I’m sorry none of his jokes land
Wow they deleted a comment that pointed out Tim contradicting himself, good job KF.
#game journalists
Why are y'all upset that REmake3 is more action than REmake2? That's literally the point lol. Jill is supposed to be the bad ass super cop compared to the nobodies that Clair and Leon were in re2.
Puffen 0 ikr
As a huge RE fan and happy to say the original RE3:Nemesis is my favorite of the series, seeing the game early as I can't help myself when it comes to spoilers well... It looks great and I'm interested in seeing how I'll feel playing it myself, at the same time I am a little disappointed with what did get cut. Otherwise I can't wait for Friday to start playing this!
Because a lot of people feel that Resident Evil shouldnt be a more action focused series. Its should be a slow burn about trying to survive, not running ariund like a superhero. Thats why they scaled it back in RE7 after RE6.
Everyone acting like RE2 was some beefy 10 hr game...lol
Re2 had two different sides to play. That alone was more than 10hrs together. Also, A shit ton of replayability plus 4th survivor and Tofu. So yes, it was beefy.
@@PlagueJ retread ground with hardly no differences and two modes that aren't fun unless you are into them.
@@IceKicker18 Yeah, most of the scenarios are the same. I liked RE2 a lot, but there really isnt much there. Didnt think it was a goty at all but I enjoyed it. Don't think I'll have a better or worse experience, but a second scenario would've been nice. Or they could've made the single campaign twice as long
@@IceKicker18 Hardly no difference? There's different cutscene and route for god sake.
Brett Austin yeah but there’s been many successful games in the past there were about 5 - 7 hours long. I got a copy early and the game is actually GREAT!! It’s just a little more action focus and that’s mainly due to the fact that the original RE3 was more action focused than the original RE2.
Wasn’t there a report came out that said Re2 remake and RE3 remake were originally gonna be packaged together
So i've been seeing a lot of hub bub about the length of Resident Evil 3 Remake, here's my opinion.
Shorter Game length ≠ less value even if its $60.
Longer Game length ≠ more value even if its $60.
What about when a game is too long and outstays its welcome and drags the quality of the game down? That isnt adding value.
yes i agree, thats what my second sentence was about.
quality over quantity, i loved re2 because for 12 hours it was a top quallity game all the way through, where as say something like AC Odyssey i enjoyed alot at first but grew to hate because of its padding and forced longevity. Tired of every game trying to be a 100 hour mega open world rpg
It depends really. Just so you can understand my point of view, where I live a minimum wage is 1200$ but because of taxes a game costs 250$. See where I'm at? I don't think RE3 is a problem because I'd replay a lot like RE2 but ignoring how short a game is isn't smart in some cases. I tend to over-analyse games, sometimes I spend a week going back and forth and gathering info on a game to know if it's really worth it.
I want to spend on two games right now but there are 5 that I'm interested in. Nioh 2 (already got this one), Doom Eternal, RE3, Persona Royal and FFVIIR. Given the amount of games coming out and the amount of free time I have (because of the quarantine) I decided to wait a bit on Doom Eternal and went with Nioh 2, I love both games but Nioh 2 is more bang for my buck.
Now I'm between RE3, Persona 5 Royal and FFVII. I have no doubt that RE3 is awesome but if I replay it 8 times it still doesn't compare to the amount of content P5 and FF has.
If I look at RE3 and it's developers with empathy I see how it's a 60 dollar game but if I look at it as a consumer/gamer it's a bit too much for what it is. If there were absolutely no games that interest me releasing I'd definitely pull the trigger on it. I know I'll regret the purchase when I buy it and and when I finish the game after 6 hours even knowing that I'll be replaying it a lot.
The issue isnt neccesarily that its short but it feels like its missing content. All classic RE games are short but they dont feel like they're missing something.
This is actually good news for me. I was thinking in the demo that Nemesis is so over powered that the game won't be fun
I think the problem is not that he isn't overpowered but that he isn't a factor in the game like Mr X was in 2.
Not to detract from the RE3 convo, but can't get over whatever that theater room is that Tim is recording in. Looks so dope.
Once you put in your head nemesis is just a mechanic and not a thing there to ruin all your plans the fear is gone.
I think its amazing, liked it just as much as Resident Evil 2 Remake. I've never played the og versions of either and people have said there's some new and cut content from RE3R.
The original RE3 was intended to be a spin off, but was fleshed out into a full sequel. The original RE2 had like 5 times as much content as RE3. But even the RE2 remake was truncated from its original version. No B campaigns. Very few Raccoon City street environments. Including Mr. X as a prominent part of both campaigns distracted for William Birkin's role in the story line. So when you reduce the Resident Evil 3 content, you have a reduced version of what was always sort of the third Resident Evil 2 campaign, and it can't sustain a $60 release.
Labyrinthian level design (the mansion, the police station) is truly the essence of the Resident Evil franchise, and it is what distinguishes it from other game series. This is what made the Resident Evil 2 remake special. The reason Mr. X works better than Nemesis, is that he's stalking you through that environment, and you have to be strategic about what path you take to avoid him and other enemies. Resident Evil 3 was always more linear (not as many interconnected hallways etc) but it maintained the randomness of the fights by having a set of variable actions the player could take that would trigger a Nemesis appearance.
People who recall late 90s gaming, will remember that shortly after Resident Evil 3, Silent Hill 2 introduced its own spin on the stalker horror trope in the form of Pyramid Head. Despite not having tank controls and being fully 3D, Silent Hill has never been given the expectation of playing like Devil May Cry or Gears of War. In fact people were effusive of th4 Hideo Kojima Silent Hills demo that consisted solely of a character walking down a hallway.
It was Clocktower that pioneered the stalker trope and survival horror, via a slasher villain with giant hedge trimmers. Clocktower didn't have any combat whatsoever, let alone tank controls vs action mechanics. The entire mechanic was evasion, paired with haunted house story telling. This same gameplay paradigm was explored more recently in Amnesia on the PC, where it was received as some kind of artistic innovation. But in fact, survival horror has always had its roots in Adventure Games, not in action titles.
People have been unable to appreciate survival horror, because so much analysis of games is steeped in a zero-sum mentality of, what is 'the best' game mechanic, or what are the 'correct' controls. This habitual mentality of critics homogenizes video games as a whole. it fails to appreciate the intricacies of design that make any experience more than the sum if its parts. We are able to appreciate how iconic the nurses are in Silent Hill games for instance. But we don't translate that recognition to a broader analysis of criteria for "quality" in general.
A Resident Evil 4 remake would not work because it has none of this DNA that makes a Resident Evil game greater than the sum of its parts. It is just a shooter. Really it was a late gen technical showpiece for the Gamecube, that betrayed loyal fans of the franchise, and was quickly supplanted by the likes of Gears of War and Uncharted, and so forth. Not because those franchises are better than Resident Evil. But because they're more sophisticated action games. They are more advanced software. If you don't engage a higher level of analysis, all games will ever be is a series of technical advancements.
Kinda funny, Kinda awesome
I'm still excited for the game but the RE3 demo screamed of a different creation team that did not discuss what made RE2 pop. I'm hoping I'll love it.
Re3 has always been more action based than 2
Also re2 was not that long either . I beat leon I think in 6 hours and Claire's in 4 hours.
It also has 4 different stories, and new game plus
@@buttertoast1146 plus the free dlc
RE3 remake has a new game plus, RE2 remake isn’t 4 different stories, scenario B is pretty much the same as A.
@@buttertoast1146 re2 4 different stories? Claire and leon are the same and I know you have the two mini challenges with hunk/ tofu but they ain't stories
@Christian Longo any need for the aggression 🤣
Capcom please make a dedicated REengine developer team dedicated to pumping out remakes: code veronica, dino crisis, re4, etc
This is KFG Vol. 2 Episode 14 (Episode 266 overall)
Resident Evil 3 Remake feels like it is only worth $40 rather than a full game price due to so many reused elements
The reason RE3make wasn't as expanded or content-rich as RE2 remake is because, Blessing's hunch is 100% correct, they were developed concurrently. They began development at roughly the same time with the intention of releasing them fairly close together.Just look at the credits, As Imran said, a satellite studio is mostly responsible for RE3, and the team was way smaller than RE2's (which was developed internally).
Re3 remake was never going to be better than Remake 2, because the original wasn't better than 2 either. Here's hoping we get Code Veronica after re8. Since CV is the true sequel to 2.
Yeah. Code Veronica is a way better game than RE3.
@@BasketCase-rr7tx Only issue with it really was the awful voice acting lol which would obviously be fixed in a remake
Agreed. I think people don't give CV enough credit because 3 wasn't that great. I hope we get CV before 4 remake
@@TheNaughtyBiscotti I think we'd get a CV remake before 4. Dont think they'd let all that Claire hype, built from re2 remake, go to waste on a really good story for her. It would sell a ton. That said, we'll probably get re8 next Also doing cv after 8 would give re4 more time to age and more of a want for a remake.
From a pure gameplay perspective and not counting story, I am one of the gamers, who actually felt the original RE3 was better than RE2.
My biggest issue with the original RE2 was how the boss battles and enemy variety were not implemented in a way that I found challenging, for the variety of weapons offered. For me, this was a major problem that kept me from viewing RE2 as a personal Survival Horror classic, although I did think that it had a great story, atmosphere, and campaign structure.
When I played RE3, I felt like I was experiencing the intended gameplay of RE2, if the basic controls were touched up a bit, the boss battles in general were tougher, Mr. X was no longer a pushover, and the enemy variety forced me to be more strategic with the different weapons. The more action-oriented nature was incidental to me. My only points of criticism for RE3’s gameplay were the “dodgy” dodge system, lack of a non-Nemesis boss besides the two Gravediggers, and me not enjoying Mercenaries as much as other players did.
But once the RE2 Remake was released, for all its shortcomings and cut content, it did fix the original RE2’s biggest problem for me. Now, depending on how problematic the RE3 Remake’s cuts are, I might end up enjoying the RE2 Remake more than the new RE3.
I think hardcore should have been the normal difficulty of this game to make Nemesis more intimidating
Code Veronica is long right? I remember at least taking longer than 3?
It's been a while since I've played it, but I remember it being one of the longest RE games. While 3 is one of the shortest.
15 to 20 hours says How Long to Beat site.
It's basically two Resident Evil campaign lengths.
I wish you guys would try out showing gameplay footage under you all with your 4 cameras on top while talking about a game. You could even just have it in a small box in the corner or in the center or something. It's so much more engaging and helpful for those of us who watch the vods of the podcast. The co-optional podcast did this, dropped frames does this, roundtable did this, as well as others and it is so much more engaging and helpful to the 4 people just sitting talking format you guys have always done. Even just showing it for a minute is better than not at all. I've commented this before, and I think it's something the vod dudes and ladies would love.
32:00 RE3 is primarily a 1P game just like RE2. RE2 now goes on sale for $20 normally after a year of being out. Early adopters pay full or near full price, then the deep sale cuts come sooner than many of games would. RE2 had no DLC expansions that drove up the cost BTW, just cosmetics.
RE2 had the 4th Survivor, Tofu Survivor, and the Ghost Survivors.
The whole RE2/RE3 is better comes down to nostalgia and which one did you play first. I played RE3 first and I am MUCH more pumped on RE3 than i was with 2. Don’t get me wrong, i love both but i feel like i like RE3 more than others because that’s the first Resident Evil i ever played back in the day. I think that has a lot to do with it.
Same I comepletely see where you are coming from, I played 2 first and it’s my favorite game of all time and I was super pumped, I like the original three and I’m looking forward to 3 remake but I’m not super excited because In my opinion I think that 3 is nowhere as good as 2 and I never thought that a remake of 3 would be better then 2.
I feel thats how it is with all RE games. Like I dont think 4 is as good of a game as people say because RE2 is the gold standard for an RE game, in my opinion, because it was the first one I really invested time into.
Bless rambles about all sorts again to the point your like wtf he going in about yet again
He's outta place at KF imo. He's like a regular gaming dude that I would hang out with like Tim, but Tim is usually relagated to hosting lol. We need C-Dawg back or Fran on everyday
This guy sticks out like a sore thumb and his complaints don't even make any sense, ane that goes for everybody else also. The game is more or less the same as Resident Evil 2 what more could you want.
Is that even English?
@@SadisticOtters my phone screen is cracked m, it was the best I could do
@@melko1408 what's happened to fran? KF has really fallen imo, still love the E3 reactions and predictions stuff but lately they read the article out you've already read like 2 days before and they don't go into the gaming topic enough.
RE3 = 5 hours. RE4 = 20 hours. Not comparable.
Dumbest comment of the year
Already seen two 9s and a 8.5 from major review sites so I think people are just vibing with it differently than Kinda Funny this time around
The problem with major review sites is that every game is a 9
@@guilhermeguarnieri did you guys see gamespots score? lol it's pretty mixed actually. higher than i expected
Blessing irritates me im not sure why though.....not a bad guy though im sure but i never agree with him ill keep trying
Resident Evil 3 has a way better mode in Nightmare Difficulty than a play through as a 2nd character for me
They need to take their time with re4. Tbh they could just give it the new engine / graphics and leave it as it is
Except that's now how switching over to different engines work. You don't just port a game over, dial up the graphics and call it a day. Lmao. Just about everything would have to be redone. As it's so outdated, probably a large portion of the programming as well
@@tiernanstevens117 I know it's not about flicking a switch and the ports done but like blue point did with shadow . Even if it takes 3/4 years for resi 4 in this new engine would be worth it
I think they were meant to release re2 and 3
Do you think they're ever gunna go full crazy and remake the spinoffs? Revelations 1? Survivor? Outbreak?
Why does everyone want re4 remake to be next?? Code veronica should be next. wtf people.
If they skip Code Veronica to remake RE4 I will lose my shit.
as someone who has RE4 as one of his favorite games ever, I am okay with you losing your shit. LOL. I'm kinda kidding, i wouldn't be mad but while i have no attachment to code veronica, i consider the dreamcast an abomination, and RE 4 is clearly superior i would like a remake of Veronica. My last sentence is slightly long but i wanted to get my jabs in on Veronica and Dreamcast (yes I know there was a ps2 version later)
@@boochtron RE4 is a phenomenal game and one of the best games ever made, but I'm willing to say Code Veronica is a better Resident Evil game if that makes sense.
My only criticism is what they removed. They shouldn't have cut anything, major mess up. Perhaps there are easter eggs but why reduce memorable plot points to just that?
wasnt re2r the same length as re3r, re2r wasnt that long plus the other campaigns didnt add much.
Its a little longer than RE3r given you are playing it normally. Most RE games can technically be beaten in 2 or 3 hours so it depends. But Re2r technically does have the B scenerio with a different character and different story/cutscenes, the 4th survivor, tofu survivor, and the ghost survivors.
DAM! You guys are off! RE3 was amazing! Loved every second of it! 9 outs 10
I must be wrong cos I absolutely loved everything about it. 9 hours total game time for me.
I’m a year late to the game, but I got 8 hours first play through. I also picked the game up on ps5 for $20 lol. But I was constantly impressed by the presentation & story mostly but had a blast playing this one. Sometimes even more than re2 remake
I gotta disagree heavily with KF on this one. As someone who never played the original, RE3 was excellent. It's excellent in its own way compared to RE2, but still excellent. I think like all things it's all about expectation. I expected an RE2 that was more frenetic, open, and action-oriented... And that's exactly what we got. It's obviously going to use the same mechanics and UI as RE2 bevause it's literally the same time frame. RE2 and RE3 are happening in virtually the same environments and same events. Its basically like the other side of RE2 imo and I loved that. Going to the mansion as Carlos and literally making the hole I used to get into the hallway with the S.T.A.R.S. office was awesome. The setpieces with Nemisis were incredible and the openness of Racoon City was fun to roam around. Jill kicked ass and Carlos, while relatively one note, served his purpose.
I really don't get some of these criticisms. "I didn't care about the characters because I needed more back-story", yea well it's the 3rd freaking game, Jill's bsckstory has its own damn game, go play that then you can care. "The game is too short, lacks content, and isn't worth 60 bucks", oh yea because RE2 is soooo much longer right? I love RE2 and have played through all the campaigns multiple times, it's not that long. If you combine both stories and add up what's actually new you'd probably get a game that's a bit longer than RE3 overall. But let's break that down shall we... The sewer area is straight up not that fun, and mansion is most of the game. Comparatively, RE3 feels more varied and "globe-trotting" if you will. As Jill I felt like I was exploring most of Raccoon City rather than just RPD. Oh and don't come at me with 4th survivor and other survivor modes bevause those were just glorified shooting galleries that were incredibly frustrating due to abundance of enemies and lack of checkpoints. Both games are great in their own ways, RE3 was exactly what it was supposed to be so love it, or hate it, what were you expecting?
With the exception of Imran, I'm positive the rest of them just ran through the game on casual, which defeats the purpose of resident evil.
Blessing "That's my thing" Junior
Loved it. Felt like James Cameron made an epic Resident Evil game.
Wish they fucked off with Resistance and just made a Carlos scenario separately tbh. Resistance will be played for a month tops and people will move on. Or better yet, a Outbreak remake.
actual review starts at 5:53. You're welcome
It does upset me that they didnt really grasp that RE3 original is more action style than any other RE game. And yet they complained about it but contradicted themselves. My complaints are yes it's short as fuck, I wish they wouldve kept the graveyard in this new one and improved on it. Also it feels like DLC because it feels like you thrown into a game that you're suppose to care about these people and we do but NEW Guys to RE dont because they have no idea about Jill's backstory because it hasnt come out within the last 5 years. It feels like you're thrown into the middle of something but you don't know what that something is.
I think the problem here is burnout..
They are saying it's short but RE2make was just as short...my brother finished that shit in one sitting....
I think it's the fact that just a year has passed so RE2MAKE is still fresh in everyone's mind and RE3make kept most of what made RE2 good..
And people expected a bigger change..
For them to say RE3 isn't worth 60 bucks but RE2 is..... is pretty stupid because RE2 was just as short...
That whole Sewer section in RE2 was fucking trash in my opinion, I hated it
Sewer is trash but at least RE2 has different campaigns and side stories. If there's no free dlc coming for 3 and they focus all on that bad multiplayer mode then yes it's a far inferior game
@@Blitzburgh17 RE3 was always inferior to RE2..
But not bad...
As for the different campaigns sure but aside from a few different outcomes it's almost the identical playthrough.
As they are saying we know the story of re2 remake and now re3 but theres missing sumthin. a remake of RE1 could make an end to this Series and mayb a REzero for make the “new story” makes sense. Bc everythin in the remakes change a bit or alot in the story.
This game feels like it’s part way through the story (does 3 not give it away?)
He meant in the game itself, not just the series. Like he mentions he barely knows anything about Nikoli or Carlos and they're first introduced in RE3.
Is nick still on the show?
Thanks for info guys sounds way to short for me to spend £50 for it. Will wait for a price drop.
I already took the plunge and regret it.... SINCERELY LOL!
Sounds like a good game but a medocre remake
REmake forever the best remake
Glad I held out in the game as the demo did nothing for me either
Both RE2 original and RE3 original are better than the new ones. There's much more content in both the originals. What the fuck is Tim getting on with? They did NOT add more at all.
just like Tim wants the bezel to be smaller in the Switch, i too want the bezel to be smaller for this Gamescast xD, i get the Orioto background is going and all , maybe theres a different way
They keep complaining about the price that they didnt even have to pay because they're "game journalists" lol
I always find it funny when people rush to a game's defense without actually having played said unreleased game.
The sad thing is that it’s already bundled with Resident evil 2 for 77.99 USD so it even feels like this is DLC.. enjoyed the game but way too short
What is the reason they didnt remake RE1, regarding new players who have no idea what Jill's background is and this game does kind've feel like it was thrown in here and story wise as well like to the fact that you should know more of what's going on. Like why is Jill so fucked up in the intro psychologically? And then throws you into the game that strays away from that. It's a shame because we all know Jill is the OG of the series and I wish they would've remade Re1 and made this like a Lost Legacy dlc of it. Nemmy should be more like Mr. X too. Which is a letdown.
Tm whats wrong with puzzles?
Imran should really fix his grill bruh
Why? Is it cooking his steaks unevenly?
WTF is going on? I haven't watched a KF TH-cam video in a while(podcasts only) and I come back and see Bless with a fucked up hairline and Imran is bold 😔
Re4 and re2 both came with a bunch single player content after you finish the main story bummed it doesn’t sound like we’re getting that
you felt powerful in resident evil 3 play on the hardest difficulty but anyway re3 was always a action based survival horror resident evil was never meant to be scary the fixed camera and tank controls and music sound effects made the game scary lol
Yo. RE 3 is SUPPOSED to be an action style spinoff. That’s how the originals were. Also, I just revisited RE1 remake and it was dope
Just because the original was action focused doesnt mean it was a good decision back then or now.
@@tylerrichardson3034 thank you captain obvious
@@tjrage6168 If it was that obvious then you wouldn't have made your comment.
@@tylerrichardson3034 sweetheart you misunderstand the context of my comment go to school
@tjrage6168 The context is they were complaining about it, you said that's how it's suppose to be because of the original, and I said that's not an excuse, they could have made it better
I mean RE3 is RE2 just from jill's perspective, so it would do the same. I can't knock it for that plus it's the 3rd in the series, you should know who jill is.
Interesting thing is that RE3 was supposed to be a spin off and Code Veronica X was supposed to be the true RE3.
@@drakenfist true story
Is this game worth $60?
My first run through Sekiro took about 30 hours but now I can beat it in 5 hours does that make it a bsd game?? No, and and also Mr. X only really pursues you in the first third of the game and scripted sequences in the end so how can you bash Re3 for the same thing?? Also my biggest criticism with Re2 was the major lack of different enemy types which Re3 doesn't have that same issue at all!!! Not to mention it's a better looking AND playing game than Re2 which is insanity!!! Love both games for different reasons though, both are great. Also think Re7 is a better HORROR game than 2 or 3 just my opinion!!!
Please like most people can beat Sekiro in 5 hours. This game is 5 hours first try from an average gamer. I am sure it's amazing but it's short and no defending that
Also as none are that scary, I consider 7 being the least scary, I'll go by gameplay and story and say it's not the best horror game of the 3 lol
Sekiro took most people 20 hours to beat it but if you literally master the combat and memorize most enemey attack animations you can beat it in 5 hours. Also have to know which items to use at certain times, not to mention knowing where to go to progress the story. You try to beat Sekiro and get the platnium trophy and complete it in 5 hours lmfao. RE7 is a great game played normally but VR cranks it up to ten. I'm not hating on RE2 I just beat Leon's campaign in one sitting so chill.
@@TheNightWolf-WildCraft can't speak on vr that's different and not how most played. Can't compare as 2 ain't vr. Still wouldn't say that's the average playtime of Sekiro
I think RE7 holds up well normally too but I prefer the gameplay and style of RE2 or RE3 but the baker plantation is a great setting and the Bakers were interesting antagonist more so than Mr. X or G Birkin. The dlc for RE7 is so much better than 2 it's not even close it was a ripoff of Ethan must die in third person and a bunch of shitty new enememy types except the paleheads I liked those.
it's a shame none of these guys have played the original. i respect their opinions and i can see where their coming from, but it feels like they were looking for a brand spanking new game when that's not what RE3 was originally?
i think they put a lot of stake in how amazing RE2 remake was but i have my own theory about that. Remake 2 wasn't this amazing new experience, it was a return to something from the 90's that worked well but the industry just decided not to make any more of. It was a faithful remake and the amazing reviews it got weren't because it was new, they were because generally we have forgotten how good survival horror was back then. RE3 remake just seems like the exact same thing but because we've already experienced the return to form, its coming off as underwhelming.
It seems like exactly what i want from the RE3 remake tbh.
are you new or didn't watch the video? Tim has played all the original RE games (3 he didn't finish but played most of) Imran played all of them to completion. so don't say NONE of them. also are we going to pretend like the original RE 3 was some kinda of great game? cause it wasn't
bruh 5-7 hours is suuuper short
It's laziness
@@buttertoast1146 ahaha. No. It isn't.
@@buttertoast1146 not so much laziness, the devs work hard, but on the publishing side this was some tactical business bs. Makes sense why it was planned originally as dlc for re2 remake
@@AllThatJuice- your right greed is a more appropriate term
So it seems like it really is RE3, it was always a smaller game and it never interested me that much. It seems way short for $60 and I have no interest in the MP portion so I can wait them out on the price.
releasing RE every year would be a massive mistake imo. They need to give the series time to breathe. 2 years per game would be ideal with a switch between remake and new titles. So maybe RE8 next, then RE4 remake, RE9 etc. If they continue with first person that would mean only getting a simillar game once every 4 years
Re 4 next year or 2022
My only complaint of RE2 remake is that it was only 12-13 hours.. this being 6 hours and none of the other add on stuff is a BIG bummer to me. Gamexplain said they beat it in 4 1/2 hours...I can’t pay 60$ for that. If they do a RE4 and it under 10 hours that would suck.. for me at least
News flash everyone, RE2remake is also linear, you have to get certain items at certain times, also that game was also short idk why people pretend like that game was some 60 hour rpg
Really had to do a double take on Imran! Could have sworn he was hording toilet roll on his couch! 😂🚻
Re3 is the little brother that will never live up to its older brothers accolades. It's lacking novelty. Much like the annualized assassins creed games did.
Why hasn't Tim played Animal Crossing yet? Just do it!!
These games are meant to be played multiple times what is this guy talking about that’s why they time your runs
5-6 hour campaign for 79.99 (CND) .... hilariously bad deal.
RE2 was about that long too.
@@Therandomguy RE2 took me 10 hours. And I didn't even do the second run ... Just checked. Average time for RE2 was 8.7 hours. For one playthrough.
@@jean-alexandrethibault3892 You didn't do the second scenario?
RE2 is made to feel long because they put you in the constant feeling of being cautious. RE3 is action oriented with ammo management. Minor differences that can feel massive.
@@Therandomguy I really should do that second run. Worth it in your opinion? Enough differences?
@@jean-alexandrethibault3892 The second scenario has different scenes and characters you meet. If you play the game from the beginning with the opposite character. The dialogue you have with Marvin and how you react to stuff you find is different.
Him saying Mr X is scarier than Nemesis...... Lol man that's unsubscribe level bs right there 😂
Blessing just constantly talks shit, no idea how he works in the industry ‘never played the original RE3, so I’m just treating it is a sequel to RE2’ wow..
Crazy that he's treating a sequel to RE2 as a sequel to RE2.
Should’ve seen this coming RE2 remake was just a year ago.
It's a decent enough game, but it isn't worth sixty dollars.
These guys definitely played on casual.
Keyword REMAKE 3 and RE2 original was better
Hi ow can yall act like animal crossing is worth $60 but this game isn't
Animal crossing has 1 save file so if a family member wants to play they need to buy another 300$ switch for the 2nd save file. These mindless idiots playing animal crossing never mention this which is why it's getting 10/10s proving the Nintendo bias these man children have.
Animal Crossing is a great game. If it doesn’t interest you.... then just don’t buy it.
Blessing shouldn't be on this panel
God... Blessing says so much nonsense he can't even keep up with it in a 1 hour talk session. Keeps contradicting himself over & over again. You drunk bro? Lol
It was obvious from the first trailer that this game seemed rush.
Waiting for a similar review of FF7:Remake 🤣😂😅
@Visal Ky because the length of a game actually makes a game good.. right... dont be stupid
@Visal Ky "35 hour game" oh you poor thing... First time buying a square enix game?
They lie about that shit ALL the time. They get the worst player in the world to play the game from start to finish- then add 20 hours to however long it took them.