Building the World Trade Center (PANYNJ, 1983)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2019
- Construction of the World Trade Center complex between 1965 and 1973 from an image film produced in 1983 by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ).
Source: www.pbs.org/video/american-ex...
File: World Trade Center Construction Footage American Experience .mp4 (58 MB)
Frame size upscaled to 1440 x 1080 px and video has been sharpened, frame rate doubled (15 to 30 fps). Mono audio converted to stereo and audio gain has been increased.
![[FULL EP.69] #เอิร์นจิรวรรณ เปิดบ้านหมื่นล้านทุกมุม ครั้งแรก! l เคหสถานบานปลาย l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_J4_nw8c64o/mqdefault.jpg)
Replacement upload for the video previously published by "WTCClips" on Dec. 20, 2013, because TH-cam has messed up the video quality by an additional recompression happened within the past years. There are now nasty looking block artifacts throughout the video. Link: th-cam.com/video/aPxqR8SNSCU/w-d-xo.html
@5:21 and @5:49 are familiar visuals which unfortunately would be re-seen years later. Also bless the Slurry Wall and the Workers who created it as it held and kept water out.
The slurry wall and dirt taken was put into the Hudson to give other buildings life like the Wfc while the twins were very disliked when they opened the made a huge impact during their short runs and are very missed these days.
Your work archiving WTC footage is very commendable! Thank you for preserving these important relics, and for enduring the several conspiracy theorists around here
Are you saying there wasn't a conspiracy, you absolute clown?
@Wes Fox mountains of it. Jackass.
@Wes Fox you can figure it out if you care to. Nothing I can say that you'll listen to.
@Wes Fox sure bud
@Wes Fox no
It is unimaginable that something of this magnitude would just collapse to dust in less than 2 hours
TruthandjusticeXXL no they weren’t you moron, there was people hanging out and the center column was crushed under all of the weight. No they were not empty
@@garfield8972 the only moron I can see here, is just you.
A lot of preparation was involved. Not just planestrikes
@@davepowell7168 i don’t believe in that crap
@@davepowell7168 they cut corners to save $$$. Greed & corruption kill
Who would dislike this?
hoya03 may I ask what you’d need imagination for?
Juuz
Thanks for reposting!
So much work, for so little time!
They took years to born, but seconds to die.... :(
@rj zander it imploded because two jumbo jet hit them and burned the shit out of the support beams. truther crap
@@davidkruse4030 the support beams in the top quarter of the building? Lmao you have no clue what you're even saying.
@@Profile.4Enjoying your delusions?
@@Christophernorbits you're a joke. I don't care what anyone like you thinks. This world is pathetic. I'll be enjoying my life 👍🏻
They seemed like truly amazing buildings! I wish I was alive when they were around.
Built with cranes imported from Australia :-)
Kangaroo cranes, if you want to be technical
They should have built them exactly how they were but double in size with two gigantic middle fingers on top of each tower instead of antennas
Tim R no.
😂😂😂😂😂
Personally I found the towers to be an eyesore. I prefer neoclassical architecture
2:35 Exterior column welding
Podran decir que era de acero y una mole, pero en sus dimensiones era de carton corrugado, por algo se hiso polvo cuando cayeron.
Wheres dis video come in?
Does anyone have any idea of the *piece of music used at **4:06** and **6:06* is called? (& who is it by) I know this question has already been posted by other viewers on other uploads of this documentary film. But the mystery is still yet to be solved!
We’ve been looking for years! No luck! One day maybe ahah
No music credits on the Building the World Trade Center 1983 IMDB page.
PANYNJ 1968
look how things use to be i was just. a new born when they started building
LaserDisc?
they were not completed till 1983?
Year 1973
The elevator cores were not made of concrete ?!
6:23 construction worker smoking !
13:43 Brookfield Place and the buildings south of it weren't even constructed back then !
14:15 what camera is that ?
how can be destroyed this huge building at once in a moment. It is very strange.
A lot of those floor pans were damaged at the ends then when installed they put concrete over it to make the flooring. I understand that the ends had to be shaped to fit in with the other ends of the building. But they are certain area's that are clearly damaged.
You are suggesting that this made the towers liable to collapse from a single planestrike?
@@davepowell7168 awwww you think you are soooooo important don't you. Poor little thing.
@@aktchungrabanio6467 Being honest is of no importance to you?
@jameswheeler5025 No. The structural damage would be considerable and asymmetric. The resulting fire would travel upwards consuming fuel and the structure beneath would cool again. Any catastrophic failures would be local and asymmetric.
@jameswheeler5025 John Skilliing '93 after the bombing. " The towers were designed to lose 61 columns and still stand a 'storm of the century' hurricane, although the fire would cause horrible loss of life" (paraphrased)
DC8 or Boeing 707 being the largest planes of the time.
The hull bore 70% of the load (244 columns)and the core 30% (47columns )
I bet these buildings are indistractable
They Should!.
Look At Those Massive Steel And Beam.
It Should Hold Damages From Boeing-707 Yes!.
They were, in a modern marvels WTC episode filmed in Dec 2000 to Jan 2001, engineer Frank DeMartini stated that the buildings were designed to withstand multiple plane impacts, as the exterior wall and core were designed to be a dense grid
@@AluminumOxide They did survive plane impacts.
Not to shaped charges and other methods of disintegration.
@jameswheeler5025 So you leave 'other types of disintegration'.
Сентября.или или лайне севн'тяня. Тани. Лайнер в сентябре. Элохим мигоил лайнер.
Эсфирь сферот торфес евфрот ефрот торф ев флот
It just doesn't make sense... I can accept as a "differing/new design" compared to past tall buildings, there may have been some unknowns in the extreme outcomes expected... but, to dismantle this whole structure in minimal time, seems near on impossible? What happened to basic physics on that day, that said "...there is a shit-load of mass/structure below... you will have to wait your time in falling to the ground as all this effort is pushing back up against you rouge floors above!"... ?
Exactly. The laws of physics are NOT theory. They are what they are and the symmetrical free-fall collapse of three buildings, as on 9/11, is literally an impossibility. Period. The "whodunnit" is where conspiracy theory comes in to play but as for the physics aspect, only a fool would dispute Newton's immutable laws. One-one-thousand, two-one-thousand....in the time it took to say those two phrases is how much longer it took for the top of those towers to reach the ground than it would a brick dropped from the same height with nothing but air to impede it's descent to the ground.
Why have the pyramids lasted for 4,500 years?
They are a solid mass of granite blocks stacked on top of each other...they are not HOLLOW like modern buildings.
The towers were 95% air by volume.
Only 5% was structural steel and concrete !!
''...there is a shit-load of mass/structure below... ''
...And in between all those steel beams and columns is a $hiT load of air space, where falling rubble can accelerate and continue its momentum.
The steel structure is only designed for dead and live loads.
It is NOT designed for kinetic energy.
In physics, the kinetic energy (KE) of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion.
It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity.
Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.
The same amount of work is done by the body when decelerating from its current speed to a state of rest.
The standard unit of kinetic energy is the joule, while the imperial unit of kinetic energy is the foot-pound.
he kinetic energy is equal to 1/2 the product of the mass and the square of the speed.
Since the kinetic energy increases with the square of the speed, an object doubling its speed has four times as much kinetic energy.
For example, a car traveling twice as fast as another requires four times as much distance to stop, assuming a constant braking force.
As a consequence of this quadrupling, it takes four times the work to double the speed.
@@johnm5230
The TT's did not collapse symmetrically.... and only the outer shells of all three towers had a moment of free fall.
All three buildings collapsed a lot slower than free fall.
An object has reflectional symmetry (line or mirror symmetry) if there is a line (or in 3D a plane) going through it which divides it into two pieces that are mirror images of each other.
@@Sildenafil_Damages_Eye_Retina OK, but why was thermite residue found in the debris? www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lawyers-and-911-victim-family-members-file-doj-petition-demanding-911-grand-jury-investigation-of-new-evidence-300625964.html
Load bearing walls. Structural integrity gone. You could hear the shit cracking before it went. This video is great insight🤘
Some of the terrorists weren't even born yet.
And they want us to believe a plane brought all that steel crashing down . Dont make me laugh
@@snakeoiler1292 what the fuck you on about
Exactly. That's because the planes didn't bring the Towers down. High grade explosives did. Think about it. What the hell happened to core and floors of the Towers? There was barely anything left, just rubble and pieces of the perimeter columns, which there should have been a lot more of by the way. I don't care what any Government official says with all their BS.
@Bartholomew Beauregard III Not even by them. Good ol' Controlled Demolition Inc. was responsible for the planting of the explosives. All the elevator modernization "renovations" gave them direct access to the core columns so any cover story like that would have given them ample opportunity to place the bombs prior to 9/11 without office workers noticing. Most of the elements inside the Towers disintegrated.
@Bartholomew Beauregard III
The art students were from Austria......truthers are idiots.
The 767 had a larger wing span than the 707....so it was able to destroy more columns.
The towers were not designed for boeing 767s to impact them.