Testing For Normality - Clearly Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this video, I will provide a clear overview of normality testing data. Testing for normality is an important procedure to determine if your data has been sampled from a normal (Gaussian) distribution.
    There are two main ways that are commonly used to deduce whether data have been sampled from a normal distribution: analysis of graphs (eg, Q-Q plots and frequency distributions) and performing normality tests (eg, Shapiro-Wilk test).
    HOW I CREATED THIS TUTORIAL (AFFILIATE LINKS)
    Laptop amzn.to/38bB7JG
    Microphone amzn.to/2OFn1sd
    Screen recorder & editor techsmith.z6rj...
    TH-cam SEO www.tubebuddy....
    Software (Microsoft PowerPoint 365 ProPlus)
    FOLLOW US
    Website toptipbio.com/
    Facebook / toptipbio
    Twitter / toptipbio
    AFFILIATE DISCLAIMER
    Top Tip Bio is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to www.amazon.com. We will earn a commission from Amazon if a purchase is made through the affiliate links.
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 88

  • @michalmokros
    @michalmokros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    When p-value is bigger than 0.05 we do not reject the alternative hypothesis. The only thing we are observing is whether or not we reject the null hypothesis, therefore only thing we can reject is the null hypothesis if p-value is below our significance level. Otherwise great vid.

    • @ShawnMorel
      @ShawnMorel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had the same reaction. We can't reject in both depending on the p-value, just reject the null or fail to reject the null because we don't have enough evidence to reject the null with that level of significance.

    • @ernesttafumanei5843
      @ernesttafumanei5843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I concur: we can either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

    • @learning_with_irving4266
      @learning_with_irving4266 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the end goal, is that what you mean? No pun intended

  • @texaspolygraph
    @texaspolygraph 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Once again you have found a way to simply describe something that can be difficult to comprehend. Your explanations and videos are truly first rate.

  • @user-yv7mb6vn3t
    @user-yv7mb6vn3t 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What a fantastic explanation, thank you so much, Steven!

  • @Plinktitioner
    @Plinktitioner 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for taking the time to publish such a helpful video. Much obliged.

  • @user-ey1es6fr1x
    @user-ey1es6fr1x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you so much for such an informative and useful guide. I write my bachelor thesis and try to find out if my data is normally distributed. Thanks to your clear explanations, now I know exactly how to test it!!👍🏼

  • @alirezasadeghi2975
    @alirezasadeghi2975 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I find it the best video currently available on TH-cam👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @pascalsigel
    @pascalsigel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    note: if p>0.05 you not accept the null hipothesis, just fails to reject it. it is not the same.

    • @sayantan.mukherjee
      @sayantan.mukherjee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what does that even mean ? if p < 0.05 we reject null hypothesis and if p > 0.05 we retain the null hypothesis statement. It's that simple, please don't confuse the world.

  • @michellecamacho5570
    @michellecamacho5570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great explanation it helped me a lot with my data interpretation, thank you so much . Parting from here, would be great to have something like how to chose the proper statistical analysis for the data we are interpreting. It is yet very confusing

  • @sayantan.mukherjee
    @sayantan.mukherjee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fantastic explanation. the entire normality confusion is cleared now. i wish this channel comes up with more statistical chapters.
    SUBSCRIBED !

  • @cvino0618
    @cvino0618 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video saving this for a reference point to anyone looking into BI Data Analysts prep kit I'm making

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Testing for normality? More like "Terrific video that you gotta see!" 👍
    Now I'm definitely curious about the specifics of the normality tests, but I bet they're rather complicated...

  • @nourjiheneagouf8780
    @nourjiheneagouf8780 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much for this explanation !!!

  • @LayneSadler
    @LayneSadler ปีที่แล้ว

    absolutely fantastic. really interesting point about power 8:40

  • @pel513
    @pel513 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice and easy to understand, thanks

  • @elmakkiamiri3912
    @elmakkiamiri3912 ปีที่แล้ว

    simply put, you are great. keep up the outstanding job man

  • @RicardoLopes121
    @RicardoLopes121 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very for your fantastic explanation!

  • @Vinit_Gambhir
    @Vinit_Gambhir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks ❤

  • @nis7184
    @nis7184 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks 🙏

  • @rajeshlenka5894
    @rajeshlenka5894 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderfully explained

  • @rizuri789
    @rizuri789 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, it's easy to understand

  • @merveekecan7687
    @merveekecan7687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That really helps.. thank you so much

  • @d.w.a8122
    @d.w.a8122 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank u

  • @juanjavierquinoluna3751
    @juanjavierquinoluna3751 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear, thnaks a lot

  • @fatemeh5084
    @fatemeh5084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good statistics course

  • @lavneetkaur3389
    @lavneetkaur3389 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation👍👍

  • @mdshafiulislamrion4069
    @mdshafiulislamrion4069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tremendous explanation. Thanks.

  • @loadedbylarry
    @loadedbylarry 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice vid! keep up the good work.

  • @sukursukur3617
    @sukursukur3617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why normality tests? Why dont we implement poissonity test? What makes normal distribution privileged among other distributions?

  • @alinecamargo7705
    @alinecamargo7705 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation, thank you so much!!

  • @adjoaintsiful2699
    @adjoaintsiful2699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful. Thank you

  • @Dr.UdaraSenarathne
    @Dr.UdaraSenarathne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much!

  • @tyronebishop4875
    @tyronebishop4875 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic explanation!

  • @shayistamajeed9889
    @shayistamajeed9889 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video

  • @sunnyyoda5511
    @sunnyyoda5511 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your videos are absolutely amazing!! How do you prep your video? Do you do it in powerpoint, and do you use graphpad to make these graphs and figures? How do you also lay your graphs/figures on top of each other?

    • @StevenBradburn
      @StevenBradburn  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks very much :)
      For this I made the graphs using GraphPad Prism and present them in PowerPoint. I add and remove data sets from the Prism graphs to make different 'layers' and animate them in PowerPoint.
      You can see some links to software I use in the video description.
      Thanks!
      Steven

  • @asbinanceasbinance1473
    @asbinanceasbinance1473 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is nice, short and knackig :). Thanx!

  • @v.sakthivel4688
    @v.sakthivel4688 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi,process capability aim to achieve by consuming 50% tolerance
    When the dats are LSL to USL range we can get P value
    But we are fixing control limits how can get P value

  • @mouldingsimulationsplazolo3571
    @mouldingsimulationsplazolo3571 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @fabianromero9691
    @fabianromero9691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear...thank you!

  • @azmiansari
    @azmiansari 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the data lets say score of student is not normally distributed then what will we do? Will we use non parametric test like Mann-Whitney?

    • @StevenBradburn
      @StevenBradburn  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello. It depends on what you want to do. If you want to compare two sets of continuous data that are not normally distributed. You could try and transform your data (eg log transformation) to see if this improves the distribution. Or you could use a non-parametric test, in this case, a Mann-Whitney test

  • @aaronecelph.d9728
    @aaronecelph.d9728 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @domillima
    @domillima ปีที่แล้ว

    great video, thank you

  • @TheCW6969
    @TheCW6969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder what is the smallest number we can use the normality test.

  • @couragee1
    @couragee1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @davidjones5319
    @davidjones5319 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation! Thank you

  • @LuanNguyen-kb9zm
    @LuanNguyen-kb9zm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video sound is pretty good, beyond my imagination

  • @GoKu-bc8xr
    @GoKu-bc8xr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Memerlukan lebih ramai orang jadi sebarkan video ini lebih banyak

  • @lefentswemosupa8285
    @lefentswemosupa8285 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bosso!!!💪

  • @zrigchafia8648
    @zrigchafia8648 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Really i appreciate your video.
    I have a question!!!!!
    I have a negatív value in the X axis
    What shall I do please!!!

  • @mohammedghouse235
    @mohammedghouse235 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to calculate the p-value? Please could you make a short video on that?

    • @StevenBradburn
      @StevenBradburn  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mohammed,
      Why statistical software do you use?
      Thanks
      Steven

    • @mohammedghouse235
      @mohammedghouse235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StevenBradburn Hi, I don't use any software right now. I'm looking at the basics now. But will later be using in MATLAB.

  • @worldofinformation815
    @worldofinformation815 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Sir

  • @AlessandroZir
    @AlessandroZir 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks!

  • @PiduguVijay
    @PiduguVijay 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi can you please make a video on ROC Curve and AUC curves using Graphpad. I appreciate your efforts.

  • @justrainmath8881
    @justrainmath8881 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it safe to say that when the data are not normal, we use nonparametric tests? Thanks for reply.

    • @cinnaced
      @cinnaced 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah! Use nonparametric if it is not normal

  • @ernesttafumanei5843
    @ernesttafumanei5843 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation, easy to follow and understand

  • @amylockhart8496
    @amylockhart8496 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I.....finally....understand 😭

  • @james-jamalk2629
    @james-jamalk2629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Appreciate you videos a lot.
    Thank you!

  • @lgyqchen5074
    @lgyqchen5074 ปีที่แล้ว

    The so-called “normal distribution” is just a special case of all common unimodal distributions. It is not a big deal in the foundation of statistics.

  • @kantamana1
    @kantamana1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is not correct to either accept one or the other hypothesis! There is also the option that you can't conclude any correllation in the data.

  • @kierachen6438
    @kierachen6438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation! But I have a question. Suppose I am using likert scale to level of agreement in my study, can I use demographic variable to assess the normality of my data?

    • @StevenBradburn
      @StevenBradburn  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Kiera.
      That depends on the type of data you have. If the data is a continuous variable (e.g. age, height, weight etc), then yes you can assess the normality of this data.
      If the data is categorical (e.g. gender [male/female]), then no.
      Hope that helps,
      Steven

    • @kierachen6438
      @kierachen6438 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@StevenBradburn thanks.

  • @jannua1
    @jannua1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, what does it mean if the q-plot shows normality but skewness/kurtosis does not

    • @ernesttafumanei5843
      @ernesttafumanei5843 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It means the same. Because qq measures normality and skewness measures lack of normality.

  • @bentrayford6132
    @bentrayford6132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Analyses don't assume that the population is normally distributed though. Is that the argument you're making?

  • @jsbt4926
    @jsbt4926 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect

  • @johnfakester5527
    @johnfakester5527 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FUCK YEAH STEVEN THANK YOU BRO

  • @jurgenklopp1506
    @jurgenklopp1506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who knew Lee Dixon did statistics?

    • @StevenBradburn
      @StevenBradburn  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Jurgen. Hopefully my statistics is better than my Arsenal performances

  • @rosros2795
    @rosros2795 ปีที่แล้ว

    My answer to your quiestion are you normal or not is :if you have listened all these ramblings about normality - you are definitely not normal ,wich is not necessarililly a bad thing...

  • @rumanasanam9931
    @rumanasanam9931 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful thank you.

  • @o0omheano0o
    @o0omheano0o 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much!