Anton has one of the best daily channels on YT. Watch almost everyone just b4 bed as his voice is calming me. Good dreams when I get his yt videos finished before I crash.😊
I watch frequently too, and admire that he researches everything he is truly interested in, to share with those who have similar intertests. Yes, pleasant voice. It projects his kindness and uplifting state of mind.
I enjoy this channel, and the way that Anton explain's things. He does not over explain nor over simplify, he is a natural teacher and it shows in his presentation
Anton, it’s my birthday today and all I want is for you to see me tell you that you are imho the most wonderful person for being a constant source of information in our science and physics through our journey in this cosmic dance. Thank you, sir.
There are millions of scientists and researchers around the world working in hundreds of fields on thousands of research projects every day. Finding one a day to talk about isn't that hard -- limiting it to just one that's more interesting than all the rest is where it gets difficult :)
Likely sites like Eureka Alert & Science Direct that keep up with the latest research in a variety of fields. They link to the paper in their articles, & that’s what Anton reads to get the details.
Still the only science communicator I know that is always truthful about what's possible, likely, or simply silly. I've never found something contridictory out after watching your breakdowns, and never feel lied to. Thanks, Anton, for being consistently honest & thorough
From the paper “Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers” The paper states: “Here we show that DM friction drives the binary infall provided that the DM spike is able to absorb the frictional energy without being disrupted.” “Researchers have proposed that, in the intermediate regime, when the black holes are about 0.3-3 light-years apart, the system could lose momentum through gravitational interactions with dark matter. They show that this can occur if the dark-matter particles can scatter off one another.” → Personally I find this interesting.
The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
If dark matter particles only interact gravitationally, can they attract each other & combine into larger particles, perhaps upto the size of sandgrains or even larger?
I'm glad you qualified the explanation at the end by saying this a hypothetical, based on what we know in July, 2024. I have to learn Einstein level tensors plus 100 years of theory, but this bringing in magnetism help, as my very preliminary argument from geometry suggests that the gravitational field near the event horizon goes asymptotically to zero at VERY close approach. Any of the other five (E-M strong, weak, dark gravity, dark energy) interactions/forces/fields could assist. Of course, large LIGO observations will break at least three branches of theories of everything, and then theoretical physicists will have some new data to explain.
The surrounding gas in the core region of a galaxy, especially near a binary pair of blackholes, should provide sufficient turbulence and friction to solve the final parsec problem. I've not seen a single study consider the surrounding effects, just simulations of the physics the primary bodies are exhibiting. When considering magnetism and gravity working together to form a black hole, you might also want to consider how thag magnetism can overcome the stability at 3 light-years. I think dark matter is a rather cheap solution when we dont even know what it is or how it specifically behaves. The accretion disk of a black hole is much larger than most sims show, and it would potential give the drag necessary to slow down the black holes and get them closer.
I think for the earlier universe, we should take into account the average temperature of dark matter as well. If that’s possible. It’s temperature relative to everything being closer together and its temperature in the center where these black holes are interacting.
I am busy today trying to stay wonderful, but this final parsec problem has been bothering me. Dark matter gives us a wonderful solution. Tuank you, Antonl
I kick myself every time i think that's probably not interesting he covers 3 more things I hadn't considered as being part. It's really the whole package every time. ❤❤❤
Precisely: when we put Leo S’s ER=EPR and we know the EM field extends beyond surface, it’s like QM is measuring the extended EM/gravitational effects (wave-like) but we can’t resolve small enough to find particle (smbh) thus finding proton is equivalent to smbh electron the disk of galaxy…
No, they were not. Electric Universe advocates categorically deny the existence of black holes. Like any pseudo-science they are against about anything proposed by the "mainstream" science short of what they can perceive with their own eyes. This is what happens when you let a bunch of electricians do cosmology.
@@prometheus010 I can't work out why you think that, but am sure you have justified it with your own understanding. I follow space issues quite a lot and listen to lectures, read and buy books, but some people ask questions and don't even read what is written, or even listen to the uploads. These people want to appear knowledgeable, but they are really trolling you. You carry on being you and enjoy your musing about our fascinating universe. Let the trolls wollow in their mire. Have a great day.
What is the dark area in the center of a ferrocell when a magnet, ring magnet or any shaped magnet is applied to the glass? Same goes for two magnets applied to the glass' no matter what poles are facing each other, again' but a third dark spot? The accretion disk at galactic plane of inertia (Spirals' side view) is also the plane of inertia of a magnetic field. Couldn't a galaxy of such manner as we look at them' run on the same old greek rules as an ordinary magnet within your hand?( 1/phi - 3 I heard somewhere.) The center dark area with magnet on ferrocell is 0 cartesian coordinates at center of the plane of inertia and dialectric (magnetic) centripetal infall to counter space or a state of rest. The 1/phi - 3 if I'm not mistaking is just N. - over S. - with the 3rd negative of 3 being the plane of inertia. 1 to phi or / over phi is just phase disparity difference. Could a barred spiral like the one pictured behind Anton towards the end of the video be two black holes on the periphery of the spiral with one being in the middle? Like two magnets on a ferrocell show a third dark spot in the middle? ✨
They don't even know if dark matter truly exists, hence the name, but it won't stop them from using it to explain a whole bunch of things. Truly, God of the gaps magic.
Getting closer. The truth is out there. Water boiling has heat bubbles passing through the pan up into the water that isn't absorbed as heat bubbles. Some bubbles join at the top of the water. Cold spheres joining as an expansion of void space itself is possible if the accretion disk is squeezed out between them and the force of pressure from cold repulsion to propulsion pushes them into a greater external magnetic field. Size is irrelevant to magnetism as equalization. Calculations of magnetism expansion equalization. Is there a book on the calculation of magnetic fields?
TO SEE IS TO KNOW? When Human vision is infinite, without TEMPORAL LAG, Humans will finally KNOW that the purpose of Vision is MERELY to SEE. Along the way, the NOTIONS of "Black Hole" and "Dark Matter" must be recognized as misapprehension, based on misperceptions consistent with a more-or-less stunted, fearful interpretation of Existence. In the Meantime Human prognostication will (and, perhaps, SHOULD) remain a Best Guess, but a GUESS nonetheless. This continues to be a most fervent HOPE.
Electromagnetism is the only force present in both the smallest order as well as the largest, we start to accept it plays a much larger role than previously believed. Also, I want to point out that we have never isolated “dark matter” and should reframe from speaking about it so mattarfactly as it is only theoretical
Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been discovered." A college student even built a small radio telescope and observed its effects. But exactly what is causing these effects remains unknown.
@@huanhoundofthevailinor2374 You have a very good point‼️ Considering that the whole point about one of the papers is self-interacting dark matter whose only influence on standard matter is via gravitational interaction (/force). The paper states: “Here we show that DM friction drives the binary infall provided that the DM spike is able to absorb the frictional energy without being disrupted.” “Researchers have proposed that, in the intermediate regime, when the black holes are about 0.3-3 light-years apart, the system could lose momentum through gravitational interactions with dark matter. They show that this can occur if the dark-matter particles can scatter off one another.”
Interesting hypothetical explanation. It would be more accurate to say that we don't see any closely orbiting SMBH binaries. It is known that some galaxies have more than one SMBH in their cores.
This was going so well before you got to dark matter particles. Here we go again, compound hypothesis. A theoretical solution to a problem using the interaction of one unproven hypothesis upon another. If we has some eggs, we could have some ham and eggs, if we had some ham.
it's the opposite. The tooth fairy is a concrete being used to explain a phenomenon (tooth goes and coin left behind) but with no evidence as to that actual concrete form. 'Dark matter' is a placeholder term - there is plenty of evidence that something is causing all these effects (e.g. galaxy rotation speeds), but scientists acknowledge we don't know what that is yet. Lots of research trying to find out but no definite answers so far. So unlike a 'Deus', nothing is taken on faith.
When Anton mentioned they act a little like a young forming sun I got the terrifying thought of a supermassive blackhole going 'supernova'. Could that actually be what our big bang was???? And if so, another could happen at any time
They are on the right track, but which came first, the chicken or the egg? Dark matter is the left over bits of our-of-phase fused matter/anti-matter reactions; and yes, a huge amount of energy is relased, but it is not total annihilation. Dark matter is out-of-phase mass that tends to clump, and is effected by gravity, but not magnetism, as is all other matter. Magnetism is the only force that defies gravity; in fact, their rate of growth and strength is proportional. But the real crux in understanding blackholes, and the mysteries of the universe, is flow of time. Time is not a constant, it is relative; in fact, time is moving at a crawl compared to its explosive pace in the early universe. Events that take millions of years happened in milliseconds, physics was chaos. Most of the galaxies we see were born of a single massive puffy star around a massive clump of dark matter, and it sucked. As swirling matter entered the dance, a magnetic field began to form organizing that matter. There is still enough free dark matter clumping about, that it could attract enough gas to form stars in the intergalactic void from time to time; but remeber, time is realtive. Be well and be Blessed!
What if dark mayter is just gravity spread out over time. Like what if gravity 8d so weak because its energy is spread out across our 4th dimension instead of being concentrated in our normal 3?
@@wendellwilke721 Actually, I'm beginning to suspect that gravity and EM are the same forces, just bent and twisted by a singularity. Gravity appears weak in comparison, due the the fact that we see the temporal portion of the spacetime field through the lens of the singularity's pole (i.e. we only see time , and thus temporal EM 'end on). It's the hypothesis I'm playing around with right now anyways.
Very interesting discussion, though I am leery of invoking a dark matter explanation for much of anything because its properties and even existence are unproven. Also, does this current accretion hypothesis also work for what is known of very young galaxies in the early universe?
Мы научились далеко смотреть через Хаббл, Джеймс Уэбб, Спектр РГ и почему то все "деревья да дерево". Пора и на «лес» посмотреть - через «лазерную цифровую рулетку с опорным импульсом *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м». Опыт Майкельсона Морли (1887 г) популярен, а нам нужно его улучшить с помощью «лазерной рулетки *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м» что позволяет уйти от большого шума (мусора). так возможно и определим; скорость в самолете; 200, 300, 400, 500 м/с. Вопрос к Вам; что изменится в БОЛЬШОЙ НАУКЕ?
The magnetic wind part made the most sense, but still contemplating about Dark Matter part though🤔. Lots of unknowns and the way their filling in the blanks here with this hypothesis chain😑
Naturalist in the 16th century facing any unexplained astrophysical phenomenon: Magick! Astrophysicist in the 21st century facing any unexplained astrophysical phenomenon: Dark matter/Dark energy! Bah!!
@@KnightspaceORG 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Ah, a troll! So interesting to meet a troll! So, troll, what kind of a troll are you? A cave troll? A tree troll? A bridge troll? Or, just a random, generic internet troll? Well, regardless, begone! Ply your trade elsewhere, troll! I banish thee! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 GTFOH!!!
It shouldn't be surprising that gravity and magnetism work together, they are whole-making forces and thus highly complementary. As for self-interacting dark matter, how would it compare to the dark matter particle predicted by Penrose's CCC theory, the erebon?
When reading books from the 1800s and I see the word "Humbug" my brain quickly switches it to "bull shxx". It works every time. Since our eyes are the most forward on our faces, it means seeing is our most important sense. When watching any videos about astronomy and i hear about anything "black" or "dark" my brain quickly switches it to mean "we don't know squat". So we figured out the paradox of how super massive "we don't know squat" holes collide when close is because a "we don't know squat" energy. I got it.
@@KnightspaceORG Interesting. This year will be my 44th consecutive archery season so I think of senses as a practicality for leverage. (I love Jane Goodall but chimps aren't predators.) Technically,though, I wouldn't get far without what the lion wanted in the wizard of oz.
I still say hypothetically that we weee sucked through a super massive black hole or even wilder a white hole, billion years ago and hence why we are moving apart and nothing makes sense. We are just the remnants of things sucked through the hole.
Dark matter can also interact with itself, cancelling each other out or turning into something else. Truly a mystery. Maybe in the early early universe when it was rich with dark matter, it helped grow stars quickly and super massive. And also after a while the super massive star “runs out” of dark matter, all that mass has no stability and collapses on itself, creating super massive black holes. Amazing.
@@nexomelian8577Or perhaps in the early early universe, the fabric of spacetime itself was so compact that it behaved like self-interacting dark matter but also scattered (or expanded) as the universe cooled. That is, where there is curvature there is expansion.
@@hankscorpio42069 What if high concentrations of dark matter interacts and shrinks the fabric of space and time itself causing this illusion of gravitation 🧐🤯
Here is a question. Could there be an antimatter blackhole, one which primarily absorbed antimatter when the first blackholes were formed. And what would happen if an antimatter blackhole and a normal matter blackhole collide?
Nothing. Even if the matter and antimatter were able to annihilate each other, the energy cannot leave the event horizon, so the combined mass doesn't change. You just end up with a bigger black hole.
They don't collide well b/c they have such huge gravity. Things that come near them go into an orbit around it. And if they're both black holes they orbit each other slowly growing closer to each other until nearly all the colliding energy has been negated & they collide with the least amount of head on collision energy, allowing them to absorb one another. Otherwise black holes wouldn't stay together when they collide. They could break apart, & into what?
Honest question, How many layers of theory do you need to have before something stops being science and instead becomes fantasy? Like if I base a theory on a theory that is based on a theory of another theory is that still science or is it fantasy? is 4 layers too many? 2? 11? Or is it all science? Or all fantasy?
@@Darth_Insidiouskind of like the ocean is blue so all water is blue. An observation is only as good as the observer is smart. Theory is far from truth
I hate being correct all the time, thanks Anton. Have a great day buddy. Peace ✌️ 😎. Except for the dark matter part. I said My peace on that matter lol.
Black hole collisions may be possible because the magnetic fields of the two accretion disks interact, obviating the need for yet another magic dark matter particle.
Anton has one of the best daily channels on YT. Watch almost everyone just b4 bed as his voice is calming me. Good dreams when I get his yt videos finished before I crash.😊
He made a video on techtonic plates being a bipruduct of a by product of life
I watch frequently too, and admire that he researches everything he is truly interested in, to share with those who have similar intertests.
Yes, pleasant voice. It projects his kindness and uplifting state of mind.
I'm on the other side of the world and I watch him as I get up from bed.
I get a ton from the osmosis methods. Falling asleep with it on auto play.
Lol yes i was just telling my girlfriend that i like to watch anton before bed. It is calming
This channel is truly brilliant. I also love that there isn’t the constant background music that so many documentary style channels have these days
Or a deluge of AI generated voiceovers...
I enjoy this channel, and the way that Anton explain's things. He does not over explain nor over simplify, he is a natural teacher and it shows in his presentation
same here, I dont know what I will do one day when videos stop appearing on this chanel ;/
I remember him saying he teaches computer classes in South Korea, where he currently lives.
Anton, it’s my birthday today and all I want is for you to see me tell you that you are imho the most wonderful person for being a constant source of information in our science and physics through our journey in this cosmic dance. Thank you, sir.
happy birthday!
@@StraightOuttaPaddock thank youu🙂↔️
Happy birthday!!
Simp much, bro?🤣🤣
@@shantanusapru I beat cancer last month - your little taunt is peanuts compared to, little bro.😎
Rock on Anton!
...as a man who loves to learn about space and sciences, I applaud you.
You are mighty, you are gracious, you are lauded.
No, Anton on rock
I watch Anton’s channel religiously before bed and anytime I have spare time. Thank you for the awesome content and presentations! ❤
How in the heck do you find something interesting every day?!?
There are millions of scientists and researchers around the world working in hundreds of fields on thousands of research projects every day. Finding one a day to talk about isn't that hard -- limiting it to just one that's more interesting than all the rest is where it gets difficult :)
Likely sites like Eureka Alert & Science Direct that keep up with the latest research in a variety of fields. They link to the paper in their articles, & that’s what Anton reads to get the details.
Look a the sources Anton uses by following the links in the description.
The wonderful thing about the universe, is that it is so large that there is always something, going on somewhere, that is interesting!
Just open your eyes. Even toast is interesting if you look hard enough
Still the only science communicator I know that is always truthful about what's possible, likely, or simply silly.
I've never found something contridictory out after watching your breakdowns, and never feel lied to. Thanks, Anton, for being consistently honest & thorough
Epic as always. Thank you Anton.
From the paper “Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers”
The paper states:
“Here we show that DM friction drives the binary infall provided that the DM spike is able to absorb the frictional energy without being disrupted.”
“Researchers have proposed that, in the intermediate regime, when the black holes are about 0.3-3 light-years apart, the system could lose momentum through gravitational interactions with dark matter. They show that this can occur if the dark-matter particles can scatter off one another.”
→ Personally I find this interesting.
Would that imply that there must be some nongravitational interaction force between dark matter particles? Fascinating if so.
Why haven't those so-called DM particles ever been detected? Answer: Because Dark Matter is a figment of someone's imagination and doesn't exist.
@@Darth_Insidiousyes, magnetism. Too funny, you don't even need dark matter 😂 which leaves you with... Magnetism
The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
Not to underestimate the mass of the surrounding universe.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ✌️😎
If dark matter particles only interact gravitationally, can they attract each other & combine into larger particles, perhaps upto the size of sandgrains or even larger?
Thanks Anton ... These videos are fantastic.
Awsome ! I like so much videos about blackholes🖤 Thank you 😃
Anton is a super hero. Thank you for being, Anton.
I'm glad you qualified the explanation at the end by saying this a hypothetical, based on what we know in July, 2024. I have to learn Einstein level tensors plus 100 years of theory, but this bringing in magnetism help, as my very preliminary argument from geometry suggests that the gravitational field near the event horizon goes asymptotically to zero at VERY close approach. Any of the other five (E-M strong, weak, dark gravity, dark energy) interactions/forces/fields could assist. Of course, large LIGO observations will break at least three branches of theories of everything, and then theoretical physicists will have some new data to explain.
The surrounding gas in the core region of a galaxy, especially near a binary pair of blackholes, should provide sufficient turbulence and friction to solve the final parsec problem. I've not seen a single study consider the surrounding effects, just simulations of the physics the primary bodies are exhibiting. When considering magnetism and gravity working together to form a black hole, you might also want to consider how thag magnetism can overcome the stability at 3 light-years. I think dark matter is a rather cheap solution when we dont even know what it is or how it specifically behaves.
The accretion disk of a black hole is much larger than most sims show, and it would potential give the drag necessary to slow down the black holes and get them closer.
Try light, time, magnetism, and gravity to form your black hole.
The further we look into the night, the darker it gets...
So the combination of magnetic fields with matter in the disk might carry angular momentum away? Such a neat idea.
Stay wonderful, Anton.
That smile at the end is priceless, you made my day 😀
Han Solo laughs at the Final Parsec problem!😝🤣
I think for the earlier universe, we should take into account the average temperature of dark matter as well. If that’s possible. It’s temperature relative to everything being closer together and its temperature in the center where these black holes are interacting.
I am busy today trying to stay wonderful, but this final parsec problem has been bothering me. Dark matter gives us a wonderful solution. Tuank you, Antonl
So happy I found this channel, and if it was only for the incredible stock videos in the background ;)
FYI : water makes things wet !
Maybe the black holes just align north and south magnetic poles and pull towards each other like magnets do.😊
Thank you once again Anton ❤
Awesome. Really good to see. 💯
thank you for making these educational videos perpetuating scientific literacy instead of ignorance. ✌🖖
I kick myself every time i think that's probably not interesting he covers 3 more things I hadn't considered as being part. It's really the whole package every time. ❤❤❤
Just imagine how interesting and inspiring science could be taught at school = Anton.
Magnetism was my guess! :)
Seems like an attractive theory.
Precisely: when we put Leo S’s ER=EPR and we know the EM field extends beyond surface, it’s like QM is measuring the extended EM/gravitational effects (wave-like) but we can’t resolve small enough to find particle (smbh) thus finding proton is equivalent to smbh electron the disk of galaxy…
In time this powerful magnetism will explain away dark matter!
Don’t hold your breath
It won't
Dumb question: do black holes have north and south magnetic poles?
Dude that’s a great question
Wow the electric universe people were right about black hole formation after all!
shocking?
:o
😂yes, they are getting there. Ofc they still have to insert some dark voodoo matter..
No, they were not. Electric Universe advocates categorically deny the existence of black holes. Like any pseudo-science they are against about anything proposed by the "mainstream" science short of what they can perceive with their own eyes. This is what happens when you let a bunch of electricians do cosmology.
They don’t even believe in black holes 😂
Wow, the quality of this video seems to be much better than the previous ones. Maybe it’s the lighting, or higher resolution? I don’t know what it is.
Just as I hypothesized myself: black holes are going to be key in figuring out dark matter. Thanks for the vid! Keep up the good work! ❤
The black hole singularity and the inner region of the event horizon might very well be dark matter
@@prometheus010What is the source for this hypothesis?
@@douglaswilkinson5700
Quit asking people to justify their existence. What are you? The internet police? Judgemental tool.
@@prometheus010
I can't work out why you think that, but am sure you have justified it with your own understanding.
I follow space issues quite a lot and listen to lectures, read and buy books, but some people ask questions and don't even read what is written, or even listen to the uploads.
These people want to appear knowledgeable, but they are really trolling you.
You carry on being you and enjoy your musing about our fascinating universe. Let the trolls wollow in their mire.
Have a great day.
@@noelstarchild He made a very interesting comment. I just want to learn more about it.
What is the dark area in the center of a ferrocell when a magnet, ring magnet or any shaped magnet is applied to the glass? Same goes for two magnets applied to the glass' no matter what poles are facing each other, again' but a third dark spot? The accretion disk at galactic plane of inertia (Spirals' side view) is also the plane of inertia of a magnetic field. Couldn't a galaxy of such manner as we look at them' run on the same old greek rules as an ordinary magnet within your hand?( 1/phi - 3 I heard somewhere.) The center dark area with magnet on ferrocell is 0 cartesian coordinates at center of the plane of inertia and dialectric (magnetic) centripetal infall to counter space or a state of rest. The 1/phi - 3 if I'm not mistaking is just N. - over S. - with the 3rd negative of 3 being the plane of inertia. 1 to phi or / over phi is just phase disparity difference. Could a barred spiral like the one pictured behind Anton towards the end of the video be two black holes on the periphery of the spiral with one being in the middle? Like two magnets on a ferrocell show a third dark spot in the middle? ✨
They don't even know if dark matter truly exists, hence the name, but it won't stop them from using it to explain a whole bunch of things.
Truly, God of the gaps magic.
Is it possible there are longer and/or shorter wavelengths that we haven't discovered yet?
Getting closer. The truth is out there. Water boiling has heat bubbles passing through the pan up into the water that isn't absorbed as heat bubbles. Some bubbles join at the top of the water. Cold spheres joining as an expansion of void space itself is possible if the accretion disk is squeezed out between them and the force of pressure from cold repulsion to propulsion pushes them into a greater external magnetic field. Size is irrelevant to magnetism as equalization. Calculations of magnetism expansion equalization. Is there a book on the calculation of magnetic fields?
Goodie, goodie another black hole update Are they sticking parsec's into the black holes? Those black holes are pretty sneaky.
Anything is possible.
TO SEE IS TO KNOW?
When Human vision is infinite, without TEMPORAL LAG, Humans will finally KNOW that the purpose of Vision is MERELY to SEE. Along the way, the NOTIONS of "Black Hole" and "Dark Matter" must be recognized as misapprehension, based on misperceptions consistent with a more-or-less stunted, fearful interpretation of Existence.
In the Meantime Human prognostication will (and, perhaps, SHOULD) remain a Best Guess, but a GUESS nonetheless.
This continues to be a most fervent HOPE.
Electromagnetism is the only force present in both the smallest order as well as the largest, we start to accept it plays a much larger role than previously believed.
Also, I want to point out that we have never isolated “dark matter” and should reframe from speaking about it so mattarfactly as it is only theoretical
Yep
So is gravity only a theory just saying
@@huanhoundofthevailinor2374it's a theory in the scientific sense
Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been discovered." A college student even built a small radio telescope and observed its effects. But exactly what is causing these effects remains unknown.
@@huanhoundofthevailinor2374
You have a very good point‼️
Considering that the whole point about one of the papers is self-interacting dark matter whose only influence on standard matter is via gravitational interaction (/force).
The paper states:
“Here we show that DM friction drives the binary infall provided that the DM spike is able to absorb the frictional energy without being disrupted.”
“Researchers have proposed that, in the intermediate regime, when the black holes are about 0.3-3 light-years apart, the system could lose momentum through gravitational interactions with dark matter. They show that this can occur if the dark-matter particles can scatter off one another.”
Anton!! Anton!! Anton!!!
Interesting hypothetical explanation. It would be more accurate to say that we don't see any closely orbiting SMBH binaries. It is known that some galaxies have more than one SMBH in their cores.
This was going so well before you got to dark matter particles. Here we go again, compound hypothesis. A theoretical solution to a problem using the interaction of one unproven hypothesis upon another. If we has some eggs, we could have some ham and eggs, if we had some ham.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation. So, yeah, they're unproven by definition. It's not exactly rocket science.
Now we just need to figure out how they become Ultra Massive
Dark matter always sounds like Deus Ex Machina or the tooth fairy.
it's the opposite. The tooth fairy is a concrete being used to explain a phenomenon (tooth goes and coin left behind) but with no evidence as to that actual concrete form. 'Dark matter' is a placeholder term - there is plenty of evidence that something is causing all these effects (e.g. galaxy rotation speeds), but scientists acknowledge we don't know what that is yet. Lots of research trying to find out but no definite answers so far. So unlike a 'Deus', nothing is taken on faith.
Once upon a time, there was a princess living in a castle, in a land far far away...
When Anton mentioned they act a little like a young forming sun I got the terrifying thought of a supermassive blackhole going 'supernova'. Could that actually be what our big bang was???? And if so, another could happen at any time
🙋♀️💖anton & his info
Hello, wonderful self-interacting dark matter!
They are on the right track, but which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Dark matter is the left over bits of our-of-phase fused matter/anti-matter reactions; and yes, a huge amount of energy is relased, but it is not total annihilation.
Dark matter is out-of-phase mass that tends to clump, and is effected by gravity, but not magnetism, as is all other matter.
Magnetism is the only force that defies gravity; in fact, their rate of growth and strength is proportional.
But the real crux in understanding blackholes, and the mysteries of the universe, is flow of time.
Time is not a constant, it is relative; in fact, time is moving at a crawl compared to its explosive pace in the early universe.
Events that take millions of years happened in milliseconds, physics was chaos.
Most of the galaxies we see were born of a single massive puffy star around a massive clump of dark matter, and it sucked.
As swirling matter entered the dance, a magnetic field began to form organizing that matter.
There is still enough free dark matter clumping about, that it could attract enough gas to form stars in the intergalactic void from time to time; but remeber, time is realtive.
Be well and be Blessed!
Gravity is a result of electro magnetism obviously. You don't need the b.s. made up dark matter.😅
Very interesting to iearn about this,thanks👍😊
Whaaaaaaat? Oh man Dude….you fried my brain again. Thanks!
What if dark mayter is just gravity spread out over time. Like what if gravity 8d so weak because its energy is spread out across our 4th dimension instead of being concentrated in our normal 3?
Dark matter is temporal particles.
🖖👍
Or simply magnetic fields
@@wendellwilke721 Actually, I'm beginning to suspect that gravity and EM are the same forces, just bent and twisted by a singularity. Gravity appears weak in comparison, due the the fact that we see the temporal portion of the spacetime field through the lens of the singularity's pole (i.e. we only see time , and thus temporal EM 'end on).
It's the hypothesis I'm playing around with right now anyways.
@@thomasgoodwin2648gravity is the result of em
Anton for president
Prime Minister
President of South Korea?
Mate he lives in South Korea, and he’s Canadian.
Back in the early universe there was not only a lot of gas but much much less space, as it is still expanding to this day
As one of a few, favorite content creators, I must suggest you find alternatives to "actually" within your lexicon...
Very interesting discussion, though I am leery of invoking a dark matter explanation for much of anything because its properties and even existence are unproven. Also, does this current accretion hypothesis also work for what is known of very young galaxies in the early universe?
Мы научились далеко смотреть через Хаббл, Джеймс Уэбб, Спектр РГ и почему то все "деревья да дерево". Пора и на «лес» посмотреть - через «лазерную цифровую рулетку с опорным импульсом *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м».
Опыт Майкельсона Морли (1887 г) популярен, а нам нужно его улучшить с помощью «лазерной рулетки *+опорное расстояние* в 1000000 м» что позволяет уйти от большого шума (мусора). так возможно и определим; скорость в самолете; 200, 300, 400, 500 м/с. Вопрос к Вам; что изменится в БОЛЬШОЙ НАУКЕ?
The magnetic wind part made the most sense, but still contemplating about Dark Matter part though🤔. Lots of unknowns and the way their filling in the blanks here with this hypothesis chain😑
Yeah just forget about the dark matter. Magnetism is all you need
@@patriciasmart1682 …said no scientist ever.
So wait, is accretion caused by magnetic fields mostly? Or is it most when the field is weak
Naturalist in the 16th century facing any unexplained astrophysical phenomenon: Magick!
Astrophysicist in the 21st century facing any unexplained astrophysical phenomenon: Dark matter/Dark energy!
Bah!!
Nope, go back to being a bad bot
@@KnightspaceORG 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ah, a troll!
So interesting to meet a troll!
So, troll, what kind of a troll are you?
A cave troll? A tree troll? A bridge troll?
Or, just a random, generic internet troll?
Well, regardless, begone! Ply your trade elsewhere, troll!
I banish thee!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
GTFOH!!!
Wait a minute "The Final Parsec" is a song by Blasteroid...
It shouldn't be surprising that gravity and magnetism work together, they are whole-making forces and thus highly complementary. As for self-interacting dark matter, how would it compare to the dark matter particle predicted by Penrose's CCC theory, the erebon?
It is possible 🤔 that photonic light can build up into matter ? When being affected by gravity and the distortion of space?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ link one buzzword with another buzzword with another buzz word……… how refreshing
😂
Is it possible that a planetary position between Venus and Earth makes them temporarily tidally locked?
What percentage of stars & planets that we see now have already been assimilated by black holes?
I sure wish my winds were magnetic too...
Once again, electromagnetism rears its head, having been severely ovelooked for a generation with a myopic fixation on gravity.
That is because we know very little about gravity.Electromagnetism is so well understood we can create nanometer sized structures with it.
@@naamadossantossilva4736 We know very little 'bout fairydust too.
I think in the rare case your subject is a "turning"/spinning one, a wheel, a car, you'd need to say "becoming"..
Trying to find any description of a Black Hole that doesn't end up sounding more and more like a Plasmoid. Hasn't happened yet.
Axiom: if you don’t understand a quantum phenomenon, you can always blame magnetism.
These gigantic magnetic fields need gigantic electric current to exist. That is the key to investigating what is actually going on.
I love how Anton always looks like he just came out of bed after a rough night of drinking 😂
When reading books from the 1800s and I see the word "Humbug" my brain quickly switches it to "bull shxx". It works every time.
Since our eyes are the most forward on our faces, it means seeing is our most important sense.
When watching any videos about astronomy and i hear about anything "black" or "dark" my brain quickly switches it to mean "we don't know squat".
So we figured out the paradox of how super massive "we don't know squat" holes collide when close is because a "we don't know squat" energy.
I got it.
You sir, are a god-tier humbug artist. 😉
Would you be more comfortable if it was called White Matter? How about Caucasian Matter? Aryan Matter?
@@Deletirium Thank you thank you. Dont give up on your dreams.
Seeing isn't even the most important sense in most of the cases.
@@KnightspaceORG Interesting. This year will be my 44th consecutive archery season so I think of senses as a practicality for leverage. (I love Jane Goodall but chimps aren't predators.) Technically,though, I wouldn't get far without what the lion wanted in the wizard of oz.
I still say hypothetically that we weee sucked through a super massive black hole or even wilder a white hole, billion years ago and hence why we are moving apart and nothing makes sense. We are just the remnants of things sucked through the hole.
If Dark Matter only interacts with gravity, it should love Black Holes best.
Dark matter can also interact with itself, cancelling each other out or turning into something else. Truly a mystery. Maybe in the early early universe when it was rich with dark matter, it helped grow stars quickly and super massive. And also after a while the super massive star “runs out” of dark matter, all that mass has no stability and collapses on itself, creating super massive black holes. Amazing.
Yeah cause it's fake. So what's left? Magnetism... Enjoy the magnetism
@@nexomelian8577Or perhaps in the early early universe, the fabric of spacetime itself was so compact that it behaved like self-interacting dark matter but also scattered (or expanded) as the universe cooled. That is, where there is curvature there is expansion.
@@hankscorpio42069 What if high concentrations of dark matter interacts and shrinks the fabric of space and time itself causing this illusion of gravitation 🧐🤯
@@nexomelian8577 What if 1 + 1 = 2?
Here is a question. Could there be an antimatter blackhole, one which primarily absorbed antimatter when the first blackholes were formed. And what would happen if an antimatter blackhole and a normal matter blackhole collide?
Nothing. Even if the matter and antimatter were able to annihilate each other, the energy cannot leave the event horizon, so the combined mass doesn't change. You just end up with a bigger black hole.
Do black holes absorb dark matter?
Dark matter i believe is made in the extreme magnetic fields around super massive black holes.
They don't collide well b/c they have such huge gravity. Things that come near them go into an orbit around it. And if they're both black holes they orbit each other slowly growing closer to each other until nearly all the colliding energy has been negated & they collide with the least amount of head on collision energy, allowing them to absorb one another. Otherwise black holes wouldn't stay together when they collide. They could break apart, & into what?
Hello Anton haha i never see anyone say that back
Macroscopic magnetics!!
Wasn't the universe more dense in the past? giving nascent black holes opportunity to engoge faster.
Interplay of magn fields an mass with jets.seem origin of grow rate of both black holes.
Give him Nobel. Or better 3 right away. Dr. Seems Possibly 🤣
Honest question, How many layers of theory do you need to have before something stops being science and instead becomes fantasy? Like if I base a theory on a theory that is based on a theory of another theory is that still science or is it fantasy? is 4 layers too many? 2? 11? Or is it all science? Or all fantasy?
A theory without supporting observations is just a hypothesis.
@@Darth_Insidiouskind of like the ocean is blue so all water is blue. An observation is only as good as the observer is smart. Theory is far from truth
Exactly most astronomy is just layers of guessing by egotistical people trying to out do their peers.
@@MrBigdaddy2ya The ocean is not blue.
@@robertsteele474 exactly an observation can be wrong
I hate being correct all the time, thanks Anton. Have a great day buddy. Peace ✌️ 😎. Except for the dark matter part. I said My peace on that matter lol.
So you are incorrect again
Nice
Black hole collisions may be possible because the magnetic fields of the two accretion disks interact, obviating the need for yet another magic dark matter particle.
I think I've generated some super massive black holes when I've had a lot of gas...
If the study is correct then the simple solution prevails...good old Occam's razor
❤❤❤