Indiana has never been ranked #1 in the nation for 3 straight seasons...whether Gary believes in it or not doesn't matter. This isn't the Easter Bunny. (and by the way, Indiana WAS a blue blood program. They haven't been anything since Knight RIP))
Parrish is such an idiot. He hates Purdue. Indiana just has never been ranked #1 in the nation for 3 straight seasons. So Parrish gotta admit Purdue is a blue blood, or Indiana never a blue blood.
I would venture to say Purdue is the most storied, winningest program in the country to not win a modern championship. Once they do, they should jump into the blueblood conversation.
@@sergiomacias5145 wrong they played in the 1969 national championship game against UCLA and the 1980 final four beating Iowa in the 3rd place game after losing against UCLA in the final four semis.
to quote Gary -- "you can't be a blue blood if other schools in your state are doing great things you have never done". it appears you need to revisit your view of blue blood + IU based on your quote
Purdue is not a blue blood they’ve never won anything. More high seed early knockouts in the NCAA tournament than any other team I could possibly think of.
I just went over the wikipedia data. It seems the following schools have been ranked #1 in 3 consecutive seasons, some of these more than one such streak. UCLA. North Carolina, Duke, Kentucky, and just in recent years, Gonzaga and Villanova. Then this year, Purdue. I might have missed one but I think that is it.
He said "only B1G team" dude: Listen much? UCLA, NC, Dukies, and 'tucky are NOT in the B1G....Didn't you hear all the vitriol from Mr Clean there; cryin' about Indiana? "IU's still a blueblood: STILL a blueblood!!!! WAAAAH!!!"
I thought that stat couldn't be right either, and figured for sure at least one of IU/UM/MSU would have achieved that in fairly recent memory, but I think it's actually correct. We're talking 3 straight seasons of #1 ranking (which plus $0.50 doesn't even get you a can of coke anymore), not 3 straight seasons of being in the top 3.
Purdue has beaten more ranked teams, so they deserve to be #1! Purdue are champions of November the past 2 years. Indiana lost their Blueblood card. In the meantime Uconn has won 23 consecutive non-conference games by double digits.
Growing up in Indiana with all those Hoosier homers was nauseating. Sometimes I wish for a return to the 70s, 80s or 90s when IU was competitive, but ultimately not 😅 go Boilers 💪
Im a Uconn fan and even i think Purdue is the clear #1. No hate here. I think its Purdue, Arizona and Uconn. If Uconn beats Carolina, Kansas and Gonzaga then i think a case can be made for them especially if theyre all double digit wins. Outside of that unless Purdue loses there is no way they should not remain #1.
All 3 teams will have some brutal December games, I think there will be a clear number 1 resume-wise but it could be hard to determine who is truly the best at the end of it, especially if a couple teams come out unscathed, and I hope it leads to an absolute bloodbath in the elite 8/final 4 in the future
Nebraska at 7 - 0 is the only other team in the B1G at this point that is undefeated. They defeated Creighton by 10 at Creighton last year. Huskers have them at home next week. Should tell us if NU has made the step up they look to have made.
I give Purdue credit they look impressive this year. So does Arizona. And also so does the team that hasn’t lost since the big East championship last year. UConn. UConn beat a ranked Texas and Indiana team without lottery pick stephon castle. Who’s the best? We will see
Beware of Creighton Blue Jays this year......Their offense as well big D is enjoyable to watch....And they have one the best HC's in the land leading them. He is among the top five.. And guess what, there is another two coaches in the Big East that would be among this ranking..
Yes, but every team will have a couple of games in which the ball does not go in the "Hole". Do you remember Notre Dame knocking off Wooden's great team many years ago. I think UCLA had won like 70 plus games in row (???) but for the game against ND, UCLA struggled with ball not going in....Happens to all teams., Mike. As for Purdue, I believe they are not number one right now..Again time will see.@@michaelventuarelle6737
Blue bloods don't storm the court either! Indiana stormed the court two years ago at Assembly and carried Rob Phinese around on their shoulders like he was freaking Rudy or something! It was freaking hilarious!!!
Now does anyone know how many times any team from any conference has been ranked #1 in 3 straight seasons? UCLA seems obvious. Probably Duke, UNC, UK and KU. But who else?
Iu was a blue blood. They are not one anymore as it has been over 30 years since their last natty and they have struggled to make the tournament a few times in the last decade Iu is a thing of the past
You SAY IU, but pick the seasons. MSU and IU are elite programs. But neither has reached #1 for 3 straight seasons. And the addition of Lance Jones has taken this team to another level.
What defines a blueblood? Can you lose that moniker? If so, who are the bluebloods? And does it matter if ur #1 in nov if you dont end up #1 in April? boiler fan here, but a nov #1 ranking does not impress given their history of failure in march.
I agree they should be ranked number 1 but I don't believe they are the best team in the country. I'm not sure who is but I know it isn't them. I actually like Tennessee's chances against them if they ever play again. The refs in that game were atrocious.
Y’all have given NO love to Villanova in preseason or in-season. They are up on Memphis 44-16 at the half!! Will y’all show this blue-blood school some love? GP has bias because Nova beat Memphis St in the Final Four of 1985.
Do not agree, Folks. First, no offense but Edey is way over-rated. Would like to see Edey go up against Creighton's Rick Kalbrenner who is much quicker on his feet and a better rebounder and shot blocker. Furthermore Purdue is not number one. Yes, in the top five right now.....Of course, at the end of the season we will see......
Also fool Purdue has always been a blue blood ,I think if you check Purdue hold the series lead over every steam 🚂 n the country,IU had the bob knight era and that was a he only time in history they came close to Purdue
Not every team in the country. Just in the Big Ten. They’re the best program is history with out a tournament title. Notre Dame and a few others could also make that argument such as Illinois.
@@DaleC1980I said almost every team I n the country,and I am talking basketball, of course I Irish have Purdue in football,,But Purdue does hold the series lead over Illnoise 105--90,And Noter Dame is Closer Purdue 14 -13 , Actually The only team I can find that holds an all-time lead in Purdue is North Carolina 7-6 in 13 meetings
For your information,That blue bloods program,you say is Indiana,Purdue holds the series lead over every team yes even Indiana , Purdue has more bug ten titles ,more big ten wins,holds the the record,you bane it Indiana have more NCAA champion hips ,But Purdue beats them in everything else ,and I nean everything,I even think Purdue has won like 11 of the last 13 games ,So as I gave always believe you know nothing ,You just got lucky getting this job
here is the link on IU.. reached the #1 rank, 2 years in a row, but never 3 years in a row en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Hoosiers_men%27s_basketball#Rankings kinda a meaningless stat, but since it was discussed there you are
Indiana has never been ranked #1 in the nation for 3 straight seasons...whether Gary believes in it or not doesn't matter. This isn't the Easter Bunny. (and by the way, Indiana WAS a blue blood program. They haven't been anything since Knight RIP))
Parrish is such an idiot. He hates Purdue. Indiana just has never been ranked #1 in the nation for 3 straight seasons. So Parrish gotta admit Purdue is a blue blood, or Indiana never a blue blood.
IU hasn't been blue blood in 2 decades
I wouldn’t trade that stat for those 5 dusty banners.
Garry is being funny. He’s joking. Feigning disbelief that Purdue is better.
40… 53… 76… 81 and 87 so no consistency like what Purdue is doing
I would venture to say Purdue is the most storied, winningest program in the country to not win a modern championship. Once they do, they should jump into the blueblood conversation.
I was totally with you till that whole "blueblood" part 😂
No lol they have never been to a final 4
@@sergiomacias5145 yes they have 1980.
@@sergiomacias5145 wrong they played in the 1969 national championship game against UCLA and the 1980 final four beating Iowa in the 3rd place game after losing against UCLA in the final four semis.
You are absolutely right
to quote Gary -- "you can't be a blue blood if other schools in your state are doing great things you have never done".
it appears you need to revisit your view of blue blood + IU based on your quote
Purdue is not a blue blood they’ve never won anything. More high seed early knockouts in the NCAA tournament than any other team I could possibly think of.
@@matthewbeck1824 my comment was on IU .. never made any comment about Purdue being a blue blood because they obviously don't have that resume
Purdue also leads the Big Ten in conference titles over IU, which is second.
@@DaleC1980 The Big Ten’s high seeds lead the universe in historically ugly first round NCAA tournament losses so congrats on that
I just went over the wikipedia data. It seems the following schools have been ranked #1 in 3 consecutive seasons, some of these more than one such streak. UCLA. North Carolina, Duke, Kentucky, and just in recent years, Gonzaga and Villanova. Then this year, Purdue. I might have missed one but I think that is it.
The only Big Ten team to ever be ranked #1 three straight years.
Arizona has been also, but they had a couple seasons vacated
He said "only B1G team" dude: Listen much?
UCLA, NC, Dukies, and 'tucky are NOT in the B1G....Didn't you hear all the vitriol from Mr Clean there; cryin' about Indiana? "IU's still a blueblood: STILL a blueblood!!!! WAAAAH!!!"
I thought that stat couldn't be right either, and figured for sure at least one of IU/UM/MSU would have achieved that in fairly recent memory, but I think it's actually correct. We're talking 3 straight seasons of #1 ranking (which plus $0.50 doesn't even get you a can of coke anymore), not 3 straight seasons of being in the top 3.
Agreed.
Purdue has beaten more ranked teams, so they deserve to be #1! Purdue are champions of November the past 2 years. Indiana lost their Blueblood card. In the meantime Uconn has won 23 consecutive non-conference games by double digits.
Hasn’t been 100 years since Purdue was #1 when Purdue won the natty in the 1930’s with John Wooden on the squad
There were no AP rankings in 1939. AP polls are just over 65 years of existence. The quote was first to be 3 years in a row in AP rankings.
Purdue is the only Big Ten team to have a winning record against every other big ten team.
IU was ranked #1 for two consecutive season twice, 52/53 - 53/54 and 74/75 - 75/76.
It was the 74-76 where I thought IU might have achieved it.
So did I, but from the info I found, IU was ranked was #1 in the Coaches Poll in 74-75 but only got to #3 in the AP poll. How is that even possible?
Did Google cease to exist during this broadcast?
Growing up in Indiana with all those Hoosier homers was nauseating. Sometimes I wish for a return to the 70s, 80s or 90s when IU was competitive, but ultimately not 😅 go Boilers 💪
IU was ranked #1 twice in consecutive years. 74-75, 75-76, and also 52-53, 53-54.
Im a Uconn fan and even i think Purdue is the clear #1. No hate here. I think its Purdue, Arizona and Uconn. If Uconn beats Carolina, Kansas and Gonzaga then i think a case can be made for them especially if theyre all double digit wins. Outside of that unless Purdue loses there is no way they should not remain #1.
All 3 teams will have some brutal December games, I think there will be a clear number 1 resume-wise but it could be hard to determine who is truly the best at the end of it, especially if a couple teams come out unscathed, and I hope it leads to an absolute bloodbath in the elite 8/final 4 in the future
Nebraska at 7 - 0 is the only other team in the B1G at this point that is undefeated. They defeated Creighton by 10 at Creighton last year. Huskers have them at home next week. Should tell us if NU has made the step up they look to have made.
This guy
I give Purdue credit they look impressive this year. So does Arizona. And also so does the team that hasn’t lost since the big East championship last year. UConn. UConn beat a ranked Texas and Indiana team without lottery pick stephon castle. Who’s the best? We will see
Beware of Creighton Blue Jays this year......Their offense as well big D is enjoyable to watch....And they have one the best HC's in the land leading them. He is among the top five.. And guess what, there is another two coaches in the Big East that would be among this ranking..
@@fromthefuture9353 creighton is good even though they just had an embarrassing loss
Yes, but every team will have a couple of games in which the ball does not go in the "Hole". Do you remember Notre Dame knocking off Wooden's great team many years ago. I think UCLA had won like 70 plus games in row (???) but for the game against ND, UCLA struggled with ball not going in....Happens to all teams., Mike. As for Purdue, I believe they are not number one right now..Again time will see.@@michaelventuarelle6737
Purdue and Michigan State are the Big10 Royalty now. IU isn’t even on the radar.
Blue bloods don't storm the court either! Indiana stormed the court two years ago at Assembly and carried Rob Phinese around on their shoulders like he was freaking Rudy or something! It was freaking hilarious!!!
Now does anyone know how many times any team from any conference has been ranked #1 in 3 straight seasons? UCLA seems obvious. Probably Duke, UNC, UK and KU. But who else?
Was Florida? I know they were both years they repeated as champs around 2005-07 but am not sure if they were the year before at all of after?
How bad, and for how long, does IU need to be before we stop calling them a blue blood?
Apparently 35 years isn't long enough
Iu was a blue blood. They are not one anymore as it has been over 30 years since their last natty and they have struggled to make the tournament a few times in the last decade
Iu is a thing of the past
You SAY IU, but pick the seasons. MSU and IU are elite programs. But neither has reached #1 for 3 straight seasons. And the addition of Lance Jones has taken this team to another level.
There is no way you can not rank purdue #1, end of story, we have a big meeting coming up in Indianapolis that im sure will be a home game for purdue
Fact
3 straight seasons.
Understand
OK so Purdue has a massive Win advantage over IU head to head therefore IU can't be a blue blood according to Gary...
To bad, Purdue is the FIRST AND ONLY B1G team to be ranked #1 in three consecutive years! Boiler up!
What exactly makes a blue blood? Why is IU considered a blue blood?
These two dumbbells said that they didn't believe in Purdue they were all in on Kansas ...
This guy needs to get his facts straight. IU was a blue blood. Is Army still a blue blood football program?
IU hasn't been a blueblood for a long time,
IU never had a #1 ranking for more than 2 consecutive years.
I agree but let’s keep in mind that the difference in the Marquette win was a 70’ 3 point shot.
Doesn’t matter. There are dozens of things in every game that could have gone either way.
IU is not a blue blood. Lol. Gene Keady had a winning record against Bob Knight
Gary seems incredibly hung up on the term “blue blood “……..
"but muh banners bro!"
What defines a blueblood? Can you lose that moniker? If so, who are the bluebloods? And does it matter if ur #1 in nov if you dont end up #1 in April? boiler fan here, but a nov #1 ranking does not impress given their history of failure in march.
IU are not blue bloods, its the year 2023
IU is no longer a blue blood. They were 20 years ago…
I agree they should be ranked number 1 but I don't believe they are the best team in the country. I'm not sure who is but I know it isn't them. I actually like Tennessee's chances against them if they ever play again. The refs in that game were atrocious.
Y’all have given NO love to Villanova in preseason or in-season. They are up on Memphis 44-16 at the half!! Will y’all show this blue-blood school some love? GP has bias because Nova beat Memphis St in the Final Four of 1985.
Purdue is 33-3 in the last 3 season in non-conference. the 3 are all bad losses
Still lost to St.Peters last year. Means shit
Well they lost to St. Peters two seasons ago not last year. Last year they lost to Fairleigh Dickinson.
Guy on the left does not know ball
refs gave that game against marquette to them. Ticky tack foul calls first half for edey combined with a half court heave won the game for them.
Oh they lost at Arkansas js
Wrong. Arizona will smack them in Indy
Since you seem to know the future, do you make a lot on sports betting? Or the lottery?
until March
Pin this...gonna be a freezing cold take. Time will prove...
hahah!
Geeeezzz blue blood hangover, no Indiana hasn't, apologize for being an idiot
And they haven’t done nothing in the tournament
Why does the dude on the left just look it up then Jesus this shit is unwatchable
It is not that easy
Maybe they can get out of the first round this year. Biggest chokers in the NCAA.
Just wait till they play University of Arizona.
Yep. That game is scheduled in the future. Therefore, we all are waiting for it.
First view
Arizona is the best, so far. Get it right so-called experts
Looking forward to the AZ Purdue game in three weeks.
right, because arizona has 3 top ten wins already
Not even close and Purdue will get them on Dec 16 so talk better walk.
Purdue has a better resume. But this debate can be settled in a few weeks
To quote your 7th math teacher... Please show proof of your work.
Do not agree, Folks. First, no offense but Edey is way over-rated. Would like to see Edey go up against Creighton's Rick Kalbrenner who is much quicker on his feet and a better rebounder and shot blocker. Furthermore Purdue is not number one. Yes, in the top five right now.....Of course, at the end of the season we will see......
This aged well lmao
NORTHWESTERN
AGAIN
Also fool Purdue has always been a blue blood ,I think if you check Purdue hold the series lead over every steam 🚂 n the country,IU had the bob knight era and that was a he only time in history they came close to Purdue
Not every team in the country. Just in the Big Ten. They’re the best program is history with out a tournament title. Notre Dame and a few others could also make that argument such as Illinois.
@@DaleC1980I said almost every team I n the country,and I am talking basketball, of course I Irish have Purdue in football,,But Purdue does hold the series lead over Illnoise 105--90,And Noter Dame is Closer Purdue 14 -13 , Actually The only team I can find that holds an all-time lead in Purdue is North Carolina 7-6 in 13 meetings
For your information,That blue bloods program,you say is Indiana,Purdue holds the series lead over every team yes even Indiana , Purdue has more bug ten titles ,more big ten wins,holds the the record,you bane it Indiana have more NCAA champion hips ,But Purdue beats them in everything else ,and I nean everything,I even think Purdue has won like 11 of the last 13 games ,So as I gave always believe you know nothing ,You just got lucky getting this job
I could do a better job on this pod than jackass on the left. Dude thinks IU still a Blue Blood and is doubting statistical facts lmao.
here is the link on IU.. reached the #1 rank, 2 years in a row, but never 3 years in a row
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Hoosiers_men%27s_basketball#Rankings
kinda a meaningless stat, but since it was discussed there you are