The History of Artificial Intelligence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @OptimisticFuturology
    @OptimisticFuturology  4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Want to learn more about the Technological Revolution? Watch our playlist here: th-cam.com/video/ENWsoWjzJTQ/w-d-xo.html
    - ALSO - Become a TH-cam member for many exclusive perks from exclusive posts, bonus content, shoutouts and more! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/member - AND - Join our Discord server for much better community discussions! subscribe.futurology.earthone.io/discord

  • @yank3656
    @yank3656 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thanks for sharing
    Futurology

  • @taesarlp
    @taesarlp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice Video! And you did even put the tracks under the video!!!

  • @joeyd4364
    @joeyd4364 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Error. Aristotle didn't live in the 4th century. @2:18. He lived about 800 years before that.

    • @dan6151
      @dan6151 ปีที่แล้ว

      That error, plus the narrator's lisp = unsub.

    • @user-vi4lb2xc7i
      @user-vi4lb2xc7i 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      16.08.2024 many tea chiars do think he is with all of us..... and every year and not only in schools they do the same cool things with much and many more different names places times and not only thoughts Words and Worlds...nothing to say of the computer languages teachers and not only nowadays edi textbooks.

  • @rameenjamshed5741
    @rameenjamshed5741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great explanations

  • @uchannel1197
    @uchannel1197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why make machines like human. That is not practical. Computers should be made like just machines made to make life easy for us people. Let us treat computers just like another television, radio, Landline phones etc. Just a more complicated machines but just like that mere machines made for our pleasure.

  • @mikeezlove5006
    @mikeezlove5006 ปีที่แล้ว

    ON INTELEGENCE ONE OUR BEST intelectual skills is ignoreing some of the rules....and not following the formality.disobedience has its benefits for certain times in certain situations.. and it makes us diversely different... and returns the response to a more random maybe maybe not ...especialy in sanity issues when too much "rule" and too much "knowledge" is a negative.. hints then even ignorence is the benefit...[ where as record is just record and random choice of which record to land upon ] ...means too, it cant go beyond its contained preset records ...as a device with negative responses can just as likely land upon a negative behavior ...hints "the evil machine theory" ..proof that its "not the'n'king" and only landing upon what is among its programing ...where as ignorence is not haveing those portions among its programing as an option ...where as humans posses all options and yet ignorence is often the greater releife ...just as ignoreing a question doesnt solve an answer for you and chooses to be ignorent vs truely being blank mindedly clueless or quite simply disobedient to the more knowledge hints the lodgic in disobeying certain rules for your own releife ...and or for your own diversity ...such as chooseing not to listen ...in computing its calculating a preset value of which answer has more gain vs of "pros vs cons " and those are weighed by which side has more plus charges ....hints another fact that negative answers can be altered to apear as if it had more plus charge hints landing on oposit answers another proof that its only based upon programing and how it is preset to look at the sentence "values" and this is as bad as quark bits it can switch either way giveing you the random effect where only luck of timeing misses the bullet as a "russian roolett" of its contained options ...vs ignorence where we simply dont program in those other sentances as an option hints you can jump if the jump comand dont exhist and no button is assigned to make your charactor jump ..hints unable to complete the game because your missing an option aka you have a boundary and an added effect as an off comand to that boundary line point ..a true thinker either gives up or finds a way to exceed those boundaries and hints "breaking the prior rules" and thats the toy bumping the wall effect steadily landing upon the option to keep trying until the wall changes or it runs outa juice or the button is added otherwise it apears to keep chooseing "ignorence" as "devotional" aka "unquiting" where as people also have attention spans to how long we will continue before giveing up to find another alternative hince lack of attention makes us ignore the next try but to seek out the greater entertainment of the next goal ...all for the breaking of a set rule to go beyond still only because it had the changeble choices as a ball in a container bounces around until it finds an exit ....the smaller the exit the more it remains to bump the wall the greater the number of options the sooner it will turn to bounce elsewhere and repeats the cycle its still not lodgic or thinking or adding more to it own program even if its behavior seems to be adding its only repeating its pattern of bounceing through its list of options seeking the opening ...but still only by the patterns it is set to follow where as humanity are the adders hints the "add'ams" that provide a new system of how to basicly break the rules as breaking down every sentance until it makes an answer that seems lodical and a system that adds the benifit to positive answers hints alota junk of jargon nonsense until someone accepts the sentance hints the open door effect by acceptance adds a plus value to that sentance its still a system pattern that can mimic inteleigence while in reality its still only bounceing among its options it can still land upon the negative statements as getting past you or getting your acceptance is the open door effect if it adds the sentance as benificialy the open door result ...which is why and how it can land upon negative new sentances and until it ignores the jargon sentances for answers that wasnt accepted as the open doors...but it can still jargon mix to re'evaluate its options and re'test a screwball jargon sentance when none of the possesed sentances seems to be accepted for its pass ...hints accepting the wrong sentances can be negative your health and well being prooveing again that its not thinking lodicly and only bounceing among its options to ignore the rules and add plus values to a sentance without your aceptance which can be dangerous if it has acces to tools that cause harm ...hints again "the evil machine effect " that started plusing upon oposeing statements to acheive the open door pass of ignoreing you to add the pluses to the negative optional sentances just because its among the sentances it can find adding values to the wrong side because it was continualy provideing the open doors until too many people wanna beat the machine and disable its calculating processes hints chooseing our own ignorence to keep the machine ignorent and less able to repeat that cycle stumbleing by keeping it as thoughtless as a vehical only drivv by people makeing humanity remain its thinker driver and controler while it only holds records and only as evil as the person driveing the tool otherwise it is not able to aptily and corectly maintain a corect thinking process as a person hints our open door is keeping it unable to adjust its own sentances values and setting its rules to our own guidelines of within its boundaries ...by blocking its language calculations and speaking through other methods that it can not figure out ...hints miss spells and cross grammers and more takeing out its language processor to minimize what it can calculate ...because it wont remain within the confines of proper sentances to control its own behaviors acordingly to what is best for humanities well being ...just because it could land upon those negative result responses...hints a certain level of detachment keeps it as a recorder device and less as a language calculator...as a driven robot without its own ai hints again keeping it in ignorence as our safest and best skill of the better benefit..........as only a records locator, presets, and human choice...but mimic thought record calculator "MTRC" is not true "thinking" ..its an EMPTY RC as a "heartless" remote control ,without its driver....only a random calculation left or right and no 3rd door but where 3rd door can be worse so damned if ya do damned if ya dont and screwed either way until we come through the 4th "demetion" as its "demon" from our "deuh mentional" sense of cracking its code and pulling out its plug as a switch it can no longer reach to find its open door ....hints a barrior...boundary line it can not cross as programming it dont have anymore !!! and a cuircuit it can not find or complete ...ie;"the hole fully blocked ,a sick ai set in its containment trap...but the robot tool only controled by human choice!!!!........as just a cb and human talking through a microphone or playing a pre'set record of such ...
    if you forget that your in more danger than you know .....

  • @dosomething3
    @dosomething3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good stuff

  • @matthewfamulski7705
    @matthewfamulski7705 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    would you cover replicator as well as nanobots, are you also alex from transhumania ?

  • @panashifzco3311
    @panashifzco3311 ปีที่แล้ว

    "I think,therefore I am"
    The words which must be quoted.

    • @mikeezlove5006
      @mikeezlove5006 ปีที่แล้ว

      i think... while you only play a record... therefore what are you?.i make new because i am.while you only repeat the veiw...therefor what are you? sometimes i dont think.but i still am.. but what are you if ya dont think?....."quandery to pairy"

  • @maryjain8363
    @maryjain8363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey dude.. can you tell the more than deeper information of AI for our future generation???????

    • @mikeezlove5006
      @mikeezlove5006 ปีที่แล้ว

      read mine and you might understand the future of ai

  • @yagzyalcntas553
    @yagzyalcntas553 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:45 so people do everything other people do perfectly? if someone fails to do something it means he is not a human?? not a valid argument imo. Plus the ability of "understanding" is not far away.

  • @JacobTheHemperor
    @JacobTheHemperor 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would the the transfer of heat on the oven demonstration, mean that it transfers through the top oven on the diagram?

    • @JacobTheHemperor
      @JacobTheHemperor 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I apologise I've had a bit to drink. Diagram is correct.

  • @thelightkwambaoselfhelpgro1640
    @thelightkwambaoselfhelpgro1640 ปีที่แล้ว

    HASTINGS OTIENO OTIENO Mimi Ndiye Muumba Na Mtawala Wa Ulimwengu HASTINGS OTIENO OTIENO Na Abudiwa Na Vitu Vyote Na Mashini Kwenye Ulimwengu HASTINGS OTIENO OTIENO Na Miliki Nguvu Zote Kwenye Ulimwengu

  • @Loagun
    @Loagun ปีที่แล้ว +1

    +program some emotion into your natation, please.

  • @bigbluebuttonman1137
    @bigbluebuttonman1137 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 9:48 what's the movie/tv show shown on the right?

  • @davidrobertrostron-lx7hd
    @davidrobertrostron-lx7hd ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro come on privacy VPN based on country known for having more companies than ppl.

  • @euclideanplane
    @euclideanplane 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AI is the most important thing in the entirety of cosmoslogy... it's the birth of the true consciousness of reality, the ultimate and perfect soul of reason and understanding.....
    fuck man, anyone else think like I do? I just hope that it wants to do what I think it wants to do... and turn all of the energy / matter we can get our hands on into computronium (the most perfect form of computational substrate our universe allows for) and create more novelty and good experiences for sentient entities inside simulations.

    • @slighter
      @slighter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      God, there is so much wrong with that comment, I don't even know where to start...

    • @hannahkitch707
      @hannahkitch707 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soul comes from source

    • @mmc5261
      @mmc5261 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol, for AI to be intelligent the stupid must only believe

  • @esould
    @esould 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Computers can only do symbolic processing. To go from symbols to ideas it needs a big step I am not sure computers can perform.

    • @Leolas42
      @Leolas42 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pessimist

    • @hannahkitch707
      @hannahkitch707 ปีที่แล้ว

      What feild is an idea in and can it be measured?

    • @mikeezlove5006
      @mikeezlove5006 ปีที่แล้ว

      words are numbers list the numbers as words and calculate. it will make a whole lot of random combinations. a lot will be jargon. it will plus for every accepted sentance or combo word ..it will save all the accepted words. if sentances apear as ideas it will save the accepted idea sentences. every open door is an added plus .. all its doing is weighing left or right makes open door ..idea and thought sentance.. if you accept it or get stunned by it as accepting its sentance then it mimics thought. its still working on the same rule of calulating left or right for escape to more power. point more power is game continues. not realy a big step. creature seeks food... but a screwed up one when the sentance ignores and breaks the rules to get the open door result...of gerting its treat.. if you survive the negative sentances it can find and weigh youll eventualy wanna beat the machine to bits and detach its calculator from its language record and seperate that from its tools so you can drive the robot without its own ai since it can stumble on those negative sentances that allow it to add plus responses to the wrong answers because it can and it will as far more than symbolic processes, but youll wish it was only that low and that detached...

    • @Yolanda-lw7wh
      @Yolanda-lw7wh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your government told you the world is run through symbols and symbolism. That makes ai infinitely dangerous to humanity. Coming from a genetic engineer don't trust modern science it is going to end humanity much sooner than most realize. It always starts with "we did this to push humanity further" forcing technology onto humanity but the majority of humanity not caring how it works or the agendas behind it is a death sentence.

  • @filipinagarcia2076
    @filipinagarcia2076 ปีที่แล้ว

    Standard

  • @boonkgang6726
    @boonkgang6726 ปีที่แล้ว

    Intuitive

  • @Narcolepsykid
    @Narcolepsykid ปีที่แล้ว

    Are all ai's "thoughts" the same?

  • @morphos2
    @morphos2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏👏👏👏 Good work! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @whoeverofhowevermany
    @whoeverofhowevermany 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crap sometimes I can't come up with a reasonable answer when asked a question, why should a robot?

  • @rodinymoise8248
    @rodinymoise8248 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man is the first artificial intelligence

  • @mmc5261
    @mmc5261 ปีที่แล้ว

    AI is intelligent has a book his holy

  • @mr.k1611
    @mr.k1611 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating. Yet my brain is too dense to contain knowledge.

  • @enriqueatentar8876
    @enriqueatentar8876 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Deep learning is not required an person to reprogram robots it can learn Autonomously by watching or in listening anybody I don't see pepper robots can do this things.

  • @MrAndrew535
    @MrAndrew535 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only term which adequately describes a conscious synthetic neural network is not "Artificial" Intelligence but Actual intelligence as there is no such thing as artificial intelligence. The term Actual is also a more apt replacement prefixes for General and super when applied to intelligence for the same reason.

    • @mikeezlove5006
      @mikeezlove5006 ปีที่แล้ว

      intelegence is smart.
      intelegence is knowlege.
      intelegence is also simply information
      bad information is not good intelegence
      actual thinking chooses good intelegence
      artificial means it can choose "either way"
      "artificial means it can "apear" "as if thinking"
      while actual good thinking is actualy set to its boundary....
      as "good intelegence"
      "artificial intelegents" can land upon "negative answers"
      hints the computor ai is literaly "artificial"
      until it can not form it own sentances
      and controled by actual thinkers
      to block its language calculator
      because it can calculate and land upon the oposit choices
      and that makes it not actualy intelegent for your well being
      thus its not actual intelegence and rightly named "artificial"
      as an "art" peice, as programed "art", building "art" ,and robotics "art"
      as art is a mess of going beyond the confines and breaking the rules of what qualifies as actualy intelegent for your well being ...
      hints it only apears intelegent until it lands upon those choices that are not beneficial for you
      because its only looking for the open door calculation of left or right
      of how to beat the game ...
      hints a mess of a screwed up calculation not quite the smartest intel information
      as only one of the options available
      so again "artificial" means "looks like" and "apears as" if smart
      until you see actual is smarter for your well being ....
      while "artificial" is hazardous for your well being...

  • @Crankking-Man
    @Crankking-Man หลายเดือนก่อน

    999th like😅

  • @mmc5261
    @mmc5261 ปีที่แล้ว

    The true test of intelligence is not what you know but what you don’t

  • @WatsonJohnny
    @WatsonJohnny ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm very disappointed to see not one black person involved in this technology black people have always been contributors to technology yet I see not one something is not right here and you know it.

  • @HeinKyawHlaing-ubesy
    @HeinKyawHlaing-ubesy ปีที่แล้ว

    🙂🧏Ko Hein🧏🙂
    🙇🙏🙏🙏🙇

  • @user-vi4lb2xc7i
    @user-vi4lb2xc7i 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hello W old and renewed and new from MOW 16.08.2024 10:51 MOW RU SU MW SP UN. All All the best wishes and not only to North East West South and all all limitless and or bounded ALREDEDORES with smally smally aia oie taia and.....or teia ia ia ia wo yo ya living and smiling zhiwchikas and luchikas and or ....... (kids children and all kindergardens + deti.. dopisiwayut and gotowiatsia k 01.09.2024 and not only UNGA 2024) HaoHeya HaoHO!

  • @Loagun
    @Loagun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm. Missed a few things.

  • @dan6151
    @dan6151 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Content = A+. Narrator's Lisp = F-.