Student Learns His “Prestigious Education” Is Nothing But PURE BRAINWASHING
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- ___________________________
--ROAD TO 400K!--
0:10 - Beginning
0:17 - Would you be accepted and given opportunities in America?
3:30 - Our own identity
4:32 -Progressivism is an American value
6:30 - Where is the democracy in America?
10:50 - These students are brainwashed
LFR JOJO REACTION
VIDEOS USED WHEN EDITING:
------------------
MY BROTHERS FIRST NOVEL!: The Tragedy of Madeline the Demon: Gluttony (Part I) (The Tragedy of Madeline the Demon Saga)
MERCHANDISE: lfr-jojo-merch...-spring...
LFR FAMILY: / lfrfamily
Like and subscribe!
Business Email: Jovaneconom@gmail.com
Follow Me On Instagram: LfrJojo
Follow Me On Twitter: TRNLVAN
THE PO BOX:
LFR JOJO
P.O. Box 262
Lothian, MD 20711
Cashapp: $JovanHall01
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
[Beat Prod. by YoungBerry Beats]
Hashtags:
I was once told buy a Hispanic woman,living here in the US for 20+ years and couldn’t speak English, that out of respect for her is needed to learn Spanish! I had a friend with me who spoke Spanish and translated what she said for me. (Because my Spanish is very limited) So I in turn told my fiend to tell her that out of respect for our country that she has chose to live in, she should have learned English! And before someone jumps on me, I am Hispanic, born and raised here. My parents taught us that we lived in America and we speak English here.
America doesn't have an official language, and a huge chunk of America used to quite literally be Spanish, so trying to enforce English is just (another) cultural genocide, doesn't matter whether you're Hispanic or not.
@@CKwoi oh please! Another cultural genocide?!! I wasn’t forcing her to do anything. As she was trying to get me to speak Spanish. Go pound sand. America has an official language and it is English. You don’t like it here LEAVE!
@@CKwoi I respect your views, but the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution was written in colonial English. I would default back to our founding documents for any debate on America.
@@CKwoiEnglish is our language! Go support and illegal if you are all for this invasion! Trump 2024!!!
@@Dedncide Unless you can point out where in your founding documents there was any mention of an official language, you just killed your own argument. Also, you don't speak anything even remotely close to colonial English anymore. Not to mention that you amended your constitution a ton of times, so it's not like it's some beacon of unchangeable truth.
What Charlie forgot to mention, the Italians the Jews the Irish they decided to become Americans they change their lives; they became English speaking people and became American Charlie should have mentioned that !
My Italian grandfather made sure his children spoke perfect English...so much so that one of his children went on to be an English Professor. In my house growing up, we were always corrected if we had poor grammar.
English is the language in Ireland
@@flo6956it is nowadays. But it's possible that some of those Irish who came over in the mid 1800's still spoke the original Gaelic, as English was imposed on them by the British.
@@flo6956 English was imposed by England...smh Official business is also in Gael.
No one ever told them to speak English. They learned on their own
I don't know where this young man is getting his assimilation facts from. Our daughter in law's parents have been in the US for 30+ years and still can't communicate in English. The offspring assimilate because they are raised here, but the parents stay in their communities from the examples I've seen.
Borders, language and culture define the term "country."
For a count'ry to exist, then everything being carefully count'ed is a big part of that.
I totally agree with what you said about feeling sorry for these students. They are paying large amounts of money, or going into a large amounts of debt, and in large part aren’t getting an actual meaningful education. They often aren’t even offered the full knowledge of social or historical subjects- especially these days. They are just indoctrinated with one set of ideals and trained to regurgitate those ideals. You can’t be truly “educated” if you aren’t receiving all of the information, and being allowed to think for yourself, form your own opinions, and challenge or question things you disagree with in a civil manner.
I think the very idea of a utopia is a bad thing. The very existence of the idea denigrates societies that are not perfect. Perfection is not obtainable. An ideology that promotes perfection is bad. Argue why it is good?
@@lizafrench8455 I totally agree with that statement. I never said anything remotely utopic. I said people should receive all sides of the story and be able to think for themselves as an individual. Most academia these days only present one side of the argument as true or correct and seek to condemn any different views. Of course perfection is unobtainable, because no one or thing is perfect. But there would be a lot less hate and division if people could learn to put their emotions aside in a lot of situations and actually use their logical brain, as well as being open to listening to other ideas, and acknowledging that your ideas alone are not necessarily the only or best option
@@ericglass8592 "To form a more perfect union" imo is lost on people today. This very statement means let's take the best ideas to be the best nation. Today, tomorrow, and the future...
@@lizafrench8455 agreed. I believe there are a lot of ideas and ideals the founding fathers laid out for us that are lost on most people. IMO they really did try to cover as many potential foreseeable situations as they could to ensure a fair and balanced nation, and to attempt to keep the power in the hands of the people- not the government or monarchy as they had just fought to separate from. There are a lot of powerful and profound statements written in those documents. Sadly many have no clue as to what those words mean, let alone what was sacrificed to achieve the founding of this nation.
I don't feel bad for people who take courses on useless things like gender studies and expect to get a job
I like diversity in my dinner but we still have a common culture in the United States that immigrants need to assimilate into for their own benefit.
The US used to be called a melting pot, where immigrants would come in but become true Americans where we were all equal. Now they come in wanting to keep their diversity and get special privileges because of it. That's not equality.
Schools have failed us...
Obviously.
But when George Washington was mentioned, the student said, "You can't go all the way back to 19..."
Bruh...
Who else remembers the term "democratic republic?"
I remember Constitutional Representative Republic, and Ben Franklin's quote of "A republic, if you can keep it."
Yeah, even "democratic republic" is inaccurate. It's a representative republic, if anything, but more officially a constitutional republic.
We are a Republic, with democratic ideals. But we were founded with a deep distrust in "Democracy", because it can so easily become a "tyranny of the majority".
It's constitutional republic. It was the democratic party that has pushed the wording to change to democratic republic, then to a democracy.
@@tokamara8795 actually constitutional republic with democratic representation.
@2:20 "...they can learn..."
The student literally defeated his own argument for diversity, by saying people can learn the language and culture... which means becoming less diverse.
This is why Charlie said diversity CAN be bad. There are limits. As with most things, extreme values are not desirable. You don't want an extremely homogenous population, nor do you want an overly diverse one.
If the US had better law and order, I would love to have an increase in legal immigration. What we have now won't last for long.
💯
I have mixed feelings on that. The annual legal rate went from 350k/year in the 1960s to 900k/year in the 1970s. Wages have been stagnant since then, and we've also had explosive increases in the costs of housing.
When you import 900k people per year, it puts downward pressure on wages and upwards pressure on the cost of housing.
Why? Do you need more legal immigration?
I'd argue the US is in a bad spot and can't really afford migration, and won't be able to for a long time.
@Mallard942 He was saying if the US hadn't put itself into the toilet, we would be in a position where accepting more legal immigration wouldn't hurt us overmuch. Of course we need less immigration right now. His statement had that premise implied just from the "wasn't in the toilet then we could have more" idea.
Be careful when thinking that paying taxes is an American value. Nobody paid income taxes before 1933. Sales tax, but nothing else. And we were booming.
Yep, that's for the Federal and the first State income taxes were implemented in the 1960s.
Thankyou, we need the strong support. Can’t let murders anymore. My bother and sister in Texas were a case. Brother in the oil field supported my sister who was in nursing school and was shot and robbed by and illegal. Definitely made me never to vote democrat. U fired for Biden and where u love of San Francisco gotten worste
Sorry for your loss…🙏
Nobody walks up to the table agreeing with Charlie Kirk. He just fields bullshit all day. I give the guy credit for having so much patience.
He only argues with college kids because he's scared of adults.
@@MoonshineHhe debates with adults all the time. You might not agree with him but he does debate adults. He just had a debate with the black lady that got fired from the hill, and does that all the time. He goes to college because they have so much of only one side thinking he tries to give a different perspective. Those kids are the ones that get easily influenced and are the main ones that need to hear a different side.
@@byronrobinson8633 Lol BJG is a grifter that doesn't count. Rightwing figures would never, ever put themselves in a position where they debate someone who actually knows what they're talking about. Also, college kids are NOT helped at all by Charlie. Think college kids are wrong all you want, it doesn't make Charlie correct.
Liberals and Democrats argue or debate using feelings and emotions. Conservatives and Republicans, argue and debate, using facts (truths), logic, and common sense. That's how you know who are liberals and Democrats, and who are conservatives and Republicans.
I cannot even guess how many times I have heard liberals give "I don't know" and "I don't remember" as answers to why they vote for the left. It's common and scary.
Conservatives have never argued with facts in all of history and you know it.
Nah, political types of all denominations trigger, manipulate and leverage emotions in order to achieve their agendas. Don't be overly naive about power seekers, dude.
@@MoonshineH:Okay......keep drinking that Jim Jones Juice.
@@johnmcjunkin4613 Ooooh, hurts to be reminded of the truth doesn't it? Ooooh
cletus doesn't even know what he actually knows.
I heard this analogy once and thought it was great. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner. 😂
Liberty is a well armed sheep contesting the vote.
I'll give you a problem and a specific example. Some people question why do we have sports in school? Why was Title IX important so the school girls play sports? The reason is that sports are legitimized aggression. They teach how the national culture considers the gray line of cheating. Now the specific example. American baseball is "hard ball". Coming close to cheating and the brush back pitch (known in the 1950s as the "bean ball"). Growing thru the 1700s in England was a rejection of such an attitude. "It's not cricket" became an saying. Cricket had to embody English attitudes of fair play.
That's why we have sports in school. A girl who plays sports is ready to be a woman in management.
Nah, both are oversimplifying. While illegal immigration and not integrating absolutely is a big problem (even with morals in mind, it's just logistically crippling any economy), the US absolutely was build to its modern success by immigrants, not settlers. Most of its modern prosperity is built with imported brains (physics, engineering disciplines, computing, medicine etc.). The matter of WHY they moved to the US instead of staying in their countries is a different (and valid) point, but let's not pretend that the US was made strictly by some ideologically united settlers and not in a major part by opportunistic immigrants. It had a massive Civil War overt its internal disagreements, for god's sake. Having to change over time (the pace of that change can be, of course, rightfully questioned) with people coming in and bringing in their viewpoints bit by bit is a price you pay for building your country's success on their labor.
Plus the very term "settlers". They were not settlers, they were invaders (not that their descendants should be ashamed of the fact as they had nothing to so with it), those lands were already inhabited.
I can respect Kirk but in terms of nazigermany he is wrong. Yes A.H. was elected in the first german democracy, the Weimarer Republic, but after he came in power it was a dictatorship not a democracy.
Jojo….we need you for president in 20 years when you’re old enough 😊to
Diversity is fine if there's established parameters. If we agree on being a country, being moral being upright, acting righteously, then we can have disagreements on things like taxes, military conscription, how to create jobs that are more environmentally friendly but will not put us back to pre-industrial revolutionary standards. But diversity in thought in America today is, America's awful America's terrible there is no such thing as gender, truth is whatever you think it is and we can all have our own truth, we can all have our own set of morals even if it means hurting another person. That's the type of diversity that we have right now and that's destructive and its planned. Cloward and piven wrote on how to destroy this country from within, and it's being carried out flawlessly.
Most of the world, including the USA, lives under the umbrella of democracy, but differ on how they operate due to hard and fast rules and specific safeguards such as the constitution and the 'Bill of Rights'.
This isn't quite right. Take America. We use democratic principles on voting for some stuff. But in no way are we a democracy at the federal level. We are a republic who uses in some cases democratic style voting to choose for our representatives. There are many types of republics.
"Some type of Disney Dreamland...Frolicking"
Haha you made me laugh.
I like how you call things straight.
The more I watch these the more I realize how modern philosophical thinking has fooled everyone into embracing relativism.
This guy don't know words or grammar
He's slingin facts...
Speak the truth and you will find your enemies and friends. And you decide who or what to choose what is right
And to the REPUBLIC for which it stands one nation under GOD indivisible with Liberty and Justice for All.
🤦♂️ Charlie plays such silly semantic games. He knows good and well that yankville is a democracy. The word does not explicitly appear in the text of the constitution, however the text of the constitution is regularly talking about a democracy.
It's like buying a fridge and claiming it isn't a fridge because the user manual never explicitly uses the word fridge, but describes all the functions, operations and limitations of one.
It's such a silly argument.
InB4 someone with the limitation of a yankvillian education pipes up about republics. The word republic refers only to who the head of state is and how they come to be. That is, a republic is not a monarchy. Being a republic does not automatically mean democratic systems however. China and "north korea" (DPRK) are both republics for example, and yet both are dictatorships. They just have a head of state who isn't a monarch.
If you have a representative system it is by definition a democracy.
Jefferson specifically stated that the country was formed as a Republic to avoid "the tyranny of the majority."
Absolutely with your statement in regards starting around 7:35 seconds. I am a Constitutionalist myself. Why? Because without the Declaration of Independence there could be no Constitution as it is and it began and stood then as it should stand today, unanimous, undivided, no Democrats, no Republicans. As it stands, began, and should end as "WE THE PEOPLE".
Here’s the harsh truth: Diversity can not and will never bring about a cohesive society. Assimilation works maybe 2/10 times and most people want to be around people that look like them, act like them, speak like them, and think like them. This why we have ethnic based enclaves in every major city in America. It’s simply human to be around your own kin. This is also why bringing in third world people brings in the third world to your home. Those 2/10 immigrants don’t have enough sway to influence the other 8/10 into embracing the host culture. Rome expanded outward and embraced diversity, only to steadily decline and eventually collapse. The only type of diversity that should be embraced is the diversity of thought.
I wish I could have emotional situations like people in the 16th century could.
Everything about this one is on point.. Not a huge fan of Charlie and I don't agree with him on everything, but this was 100% perfect. His delivery made it so much easier for this young man to hear. Not a single attack or so much lapse in manners. He educated this guy and that is how a culture war is won.
This kid is wasting his money going to college, he has NO critical thinking skills.
To say that legal imigration is bad is the most nonsensical things that you can say.
The legal imigration is incredibly beneficial for the economy and the prosperity of every country. This, to be said by an american is even more funny, this is one of the countries that benefited tremendously of imigration of competent people.
And the people did not change since 1700s :) hahahahah, what? Didnt we change? How can someone seriously say this BS?
Ask anyone if their children or their neighbor's children are a higher priority. That should be your political beliefs.
I’m army, he said be was a marine….just give him some time…them Marines are a little slow…lol. But proud of him for come legally…we do need more people like him.
This guy uses the Modern Day logic fallacy where he assumes anything more modern is automatically better than anything in the past. Also typically under this assumption is that humanity was stupider in the past. Now on a whole, society in the past was not as learned as we are today. However, individuals of the past were as smart or maybe some cases smarter than anyone alive today. Also when it comes to concepts of knowledge about societies, governments, human dynamics, and other social knowledge, there isn't anything we know today that wasn't known in the 1780s. We have a greater knowledge of physics, math, and hard sciences today than the past, but when it comes to things like social orders and such we are the same. Humans at their base have not changed at all.
if anything we base our arguments MORE on how we feel than on logical arguments now adays than we did in the past
Can I just vote for you ? 😂. A normal thinking person.
So I understand where all this is coming from and I largely agree but the interviewer seems misguided about what political liberalism is. It l’s a political theory based on strict individualism protected from government coercion. It is one of our most fundamental values as Americans. It is one if many American values that should be protected at all costs
You give me hope for the future. Your critical thinking and outlook on both sides. It's quite nice to see a younger person think for themselves.
I don't like him, but I can't really argue with him.
This poor guy. Can’t even string a sentence together, but will be up to his ears in student debt. And this is the level of graduates that USA is getting in return? Oh my…
I wouldn't call them "educated" students.....just students.
I have an example: When I shop at Kroger, some of the food ingredients are in Spanish. I don't know Spanish. Yes, I can learn, but our native tongue is English. Will they try to change that, too, when there aren't enough english-speaking people here?
The US is also one of the very few countries on the planet with an official national language.
@@Mallard942 Where did we note an official language within the US?
In fairness do some of the ingredients have an English word? Consider this. While not an ingredient if you wanted to get sushi you would have to use the Japanese word sushi to find it. There is no word for it in English, we just use the Japanese word.
@@kristheobserver I don't think that's the case. Next time I go to this particular store, I will take a picture of the food ingredients and look it up. I'm just saying, I've been shopping for food for a lot of years, and I've never encountered this. Maybe it's just because of where I live now (in the south) versus where I lived before (in the north). However, I have lived all over the country, and I have never seen ingredients in Spanish.
@@Mallard942 I just had to note this: This is incorrect for the US as a country. The US does not have an official national language at the federal level. I'm not sure if this was a typo or the person was just assuming they did because, admittedly, there are official languages at the state level for over half of the states, if I remember correctly, but it is not a federal government implication.
a nation cannot be unified unless they share a common language, cultural norms, laws, and borders. people of any number of races or ethnicities can come under one banner as long as they share those four things.
if rooster fighting, communism, or FGM is acceptable in your home country, and you want to live here, you have to understand that you must leave that part of your culture behind and conform to our legal and cultural norms.
any american would be expected to do the same if he went to live in your country.
Democracy is two wolves and one sheep voting on whats for dinner.
Bro look like rufus from kim possible....like the videos tho
Integration into a society is the key to immigration. With uncontrolled mass immigration there is no integration.
We would get diversity via meritocracy automatically if ppl were not treated as if they were lesser by the ppl speaking for them.
I love how Charlie makes student think and hopefully question their beliefs. This is what college is supposed to be about.
What happened to letting the best of the best into the country a bad thing? It isnt a bad thing. The problem is more bad people are let in than good people with good moral values
It's a bad thing for the places they have left behind and potentially dooms those places. Places that desperately need bright people and problem solvers.
@@TheChurlishBoorYou can also make the other argument though. Why should we condem bright people who don't want to stay in their countries of origin to lives of signifigantly less success under a probably corrupt government that just wants to use it's citizens for their own gain, even more than the US gov does to Americans? There isn't exactly a right answer here. You can prioritize the wellbeing of the individual immigrant and their desired country, or you can prioritize the wellbeing the the immigrant's country of origin.
I say pick whichever side benefits you more. So the US and immigrants should want 'good' immigrants from poorer countries, and poorer countries and their citizens should want to keep their talent. And then both sides offer a deal to those who desire to immigrate and the. the immigrant picks whichever deal appeals to them more.
I don't believe immigrants should be forced to pick the welfare of their origin country, that probably doesn't care about them in the first place, over their own individual wellbeing.
Hey Jojo! Can you add ten second to the end of your videos so I have time to hit the like button before it loads an ad or another video?
that was an interesting conversation thank you.
He knows he's already lost the debate that's why he's playing dumb
I honestly don’t know😓
He isn’t playing,dumb, he is dumb.
He isn’t playing.
You're giving him way too much credit.
How tf did he make it into college?😅
This was a good one. Hadn't seen it til now.
We are a nation of settlers not immigrants
And dude's in college...
Please don't axe me.
How did he get into college?
soo many times over the years I’ve noticed that people migrate here, legally and illegally. I understand why they come here, but why do we as a country have to adopt their customs as our new norm?
Democratic society definitely wants to take our rights away. They’re actively trying to take our guns, they’re actively trying to pass punitive legislation for speaking against the alphabet squad, they’re trying to eliminate their political opponents via the judicial system, they’re trying to blame straight white men for all the problems in the world… the Democratic Party is literally a hair’s breadth from socialism
Right on jojo
LFR Jojo love your videos, but please stop using the name of Jesus in a frivolous fashion. As a man of God you know the power in the name
On one side of the spectrum is Utopia, the other side Dystopia. Unfortunately, we are going the wrong direction.
Ya that guy is wrong when he says people are trying to assimilate. I have lived ij both fl and az. And the major latino communities cater to spanish speakers even when they are still a minority and allow them to live without ever learning english
What I think he was talking about with Neuroscience “changing” and people not being able to handle emotional situations isn’t people changing or Neuroscience changing.
What I think actually caused those changes was recent technological and Social changes, not social changes.
There are so many people that should be wearing floaties just to eat soup yet they get the same vote you and I do; these people aren't smart enough to manage their own finances, they shouldn't have a say in how the country is managed.
Well! The OG people were conquerors not settlers. Not saying today people are guilty but that needs corrected.
conquered what? the nomadic natives that were already killing each other for land for a hundred years? I dont think you know what conquered means
@@pabloscobar958 So if you're fighting with your wife's family on your homestead you move tents around on I can take it?
@@pabloscobar958 Preface: I come from a pro-prepper mindset.
Conqueror apologist: We dragged them into running water and electricity kicking and screaming. 🤣
Also conqueror apologist: Well I got me a few acres. Gonna get off the grid and live off the land as people are meant to. ☝️😑
the world is primed the man of the hour should be along any time now then the big show begins last 7 years of history.
oh was gonna say i sure like your channel.. subbed
Virtue and Victim math Jojo
Hi
There are countries literally called the Republic of, {Congo} for example, so there are other successful republics in the world. Dunno wtf dude was tryna say with that one lol. Plus, how do Amerikkkans decide their leaders? A republicratic vote, or a democratic one? It's a fucking democracy lmao.
careful your dumb is showing
The only noticable change since the 1780's is average height we have gotten taller
More often than not, he has good gotchas, but this time, he's completely missed the point.
The US *is* a democracy. It's *also* a republic. Those two aren't in opposition to each other or even on the same spectrum. This "America isn't a democracy, it's a republic" is the dumbest possible sentence out there. It's like saying "This chicken isn't cold, it's spicy." Nothing to do with each other.
I... disagree. A "democracy" is a direct democracy. A "republic" can't be a direct democracy.
The word "democracy" got weirded to mean any country with a voting system. But that's people stretching the word, not its proper/honest meaning.
@@Tzizenorec A democracy just means that people decide. A direct democracy is a type of democracy, specifically one where there are no representatives. An alternative to a direct democracy would be, e.g., a representative democracy, which could be parliamentary, presidential, etc.
@@CKwoi It _definitely_ doesn't mean that "people decide". Because that description would also include _anarchy,_ which is just silly.
careful your dumb is showing, settle down tex lmao
@@Tzizenorec Democracy literally means the rule of the people. Anarchy literally means the absence of a rule. The moment you have a bunch of people coming together and deciding rules, it's not an anarchy anymore by any definition that doesn't completely bastardize the actual meanings of the words. This is also why anarchy is de facto impossible, because someone is going to take control either via force or democratically. But that's a separate topic.
In any case, the origin of the word democracy is the Greek combo of demos (people) + kratia (power, rule). The origin of the word republic is Latin, res (affair) + publica (of the people, public). The original meanings make them almost interchangeable, but in modern times, democracy's counterpoint is autocracy and a republic's counterpoint is a monarchy. And you know how we know that that's the case? Because you can have a democratic monarchy, where people elect a monarch, and you could have a republic with a dictator running it. You can then add extra modifiers, such as a democratic constitutional monarchy vs a democratic absolutist monarchy, a republic with direct democracy or a republic with a representative democracy. Etc.
I really don't know why it's so hard for Americans to use words relating to politics properly. You call European governments socialist, you call socialists communists, you don't seem to realize what your own system of government would be defined as... How about you just stop making up your own language and use the existing terminology properly?
we pledged the flag, signed up for the draft, and had to memorize the bill of rights in 5th grade, now ask college kids how many amendments their are and they don't know how many, or what they they are
and God said they will tear down the tower of babel and confuse the tongues, no longer speaking the same language, and he said woe unto them for they are now diverse
These kids are so easily taken advantage of... Crazy
THERE IS OVER 30 MILLION LIVING IN CALIFORNIA
Nno identity that's what is happening to Canada
STOP THE ANCHOR BABYS