Vedanta Sutra 1.1.1 (Part 1) - Edwin Bryant

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • Welcome to the first part of our lecture series on the Vedanta Sutra, presented by the distinguished scholar Edwin Bryant! In this session, we delve into Vedanta Sutra 1.1.1, the opening aphorism of this foundational text, which sets the stage for the exploration of the ultimate reality in the Vedanta school of Indian philosophy.
    In this lecture, Edwin Bryant covers:
    • Introduction to Vedanta: Understanding the historical and philosophical context of the Vedanta Sutra.
    • Aphorism 1.1.1: Analyzing the meaning and significance of the first aphorism, "Athato Brahma Jijnasa" (Now, therefore, the inquiry into Brahman).
    • Philosophical Implications: Exploring the call to investigate the nature of Brahman (the ultimate reality) and the purpose of life.
    • Key Concepts: Discussing essential Vedantic concepts such as Brahman, Atman (self), and Moksha (liberation).
    • Commentaries and Interpretations: Reviewing various interpretations by major Vedantic scholars, including Shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya, and Madhvacharya.
    • Practical Applications: Reflecting on how the inquiry into Brahman can be applied in modern spiritual practice and daily life.
    Join us as we embark on this profound journey into the depths of Vedanta philosophy, gaining a deeper understanding of its metaphysical and epistemological insights through the expert guidance of Edwin Bryant.
    🔔 Don’t forget to subscribe and hit the notification bell to stay updated on our future lectures!
    📚 Recommended Reading:
    Vedanta Sutra by Badarayana
    Commentaries on the Vedanta Sutra
    Works by Edwin Bryant on Indian Philosophy
    👍 Like, comment, and share to support our channel and help spread knowledge.
    #VedantaSutra #Vedanta #IndianPhilosophy #Brahman #Atman #Moksha #EdwinBryant #AncientWisdom #PhilosophicalLecture #Shankaracharya #Ramanujacharya #Madhvacharya
    For further exploration, check out our playlist on classical Indian philosophies and stay tuned for more in-depth discussions!

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @sourabhnphadke
    @sourabhnphadke หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thank you very much. I am eternally grateful to you.

  • @avi2125
    @avi2125 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What an honor to find this channel. Bryant ji is such a wonderful scholar 🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @Kriyavas1
    @Kriyavas1 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Absolutely spellbinding!

  • @kenjones102
    @kenjones102 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm so grateful that I didn't study scriptures before the experiences I had in meditation.

  • @akumar7366
    @akumar7366 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Iam Hindu by birth but my practice and knowledge is limited although I feel naturally inclined in my thoughts and actions compatible with Dharmic values.
    I really enjoyed watching this lesson and will carefully view all the lessons , to improve my life.

  • @technologypoet
    @technologypoet 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This was a wonderful lecture thank you!
    I’d love to see an exploration of Madhva’s commentary as well to understand dvaita perspective deeply.

  • @EdwinBryantOfficial
    @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    One small detail. Professor says that Saccidānanda is a later idea, post-Śankara but that doesn't seem to be so. Tejobindu Upaniṣada (3.11) clearly mentions the word saccidānanda, describing it to be Brahman's attributes. So it's definitely way before Śankara.
    Now as to why the commentators don't use this term, that's a discussion for another day.
    - Mayank

    • @avi2125
      @avi2125 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is it just about the composite term _saccidānanda_ or the concepts of Sat, Cid and Ānanda appearing as lakṣaṇa-s of bráhman? Because afaik the upaniṣads routinely "characterise" bráhman as Caitanya, Sat etc. I don't remember offhand about ānanda but doesn't Taittīriya U. have the ānanda-mīmāṃsā section?

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@avi2125 The professor was talking about the composite term.
      The concepts are quite common in the upaniṣadas but not mentioned explicitly together as a whole in the major ones.

    • @Shri
      @Shri หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      > Now as to why the commentators don't use this term, that's a discussion for another day.
      Madhvacharya did explain it in his Tatva Prakashika. He said that all infinite attributes of Brahman can be brought under 4 leading ones for meditation (Sat, Cit, Ananda and Atma). The relevant quote:
      सर्वगुणानामपि गुणचतुष्टयविशेषत्वस्य वक्तुं शक्यत्वात्। TP iii.3.13
      You can refer to Philosophy of Madhvacharya by Dr BNK Sarma page 364 for the explanation.

    • @Shri
      @Shri หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EdwinBryantOfficial Also the term Saccidananada is provided in Pancharaatra.
      सच्चिदानन्द रूपाय वेणवे नमो नमः
      Madhvacharya provides this reference in context of extolling the Supremacy of Vishnu as the Brahman of the Vedas in his Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya.

  • @Hermann100
    @Hermann100 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for sharing such great knowledge and insights (OM TAT SAT)

  • @gk856
    @gk856 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. Thank you so much. And a small request, if possible. I make mp3 audio files of your lectures using an online converter, there are issues if the record is longer than 3 hr, so please if you could make your future records shorter than 3 hours. /Pardon my non-native English./

  • @vijaytellslinesevergreen2086
    @vijaytellslinesevergreen2086 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think you guys should try to teach kundalini shakti as part of human biology in science books,nobody can prove it wrong.❤❤❤I can tell you to a certain point because nobody should miss it

  • @aanakrukavi
    @aanakrukavi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mr Edwin, what us u r thought on Swami Satchidanandendra Saraswathi book called Mulavidya Nirasa where he has mentioned that the term MAYA is a later invention by Adi Shankara successors.

  • @sridharkaushik9290
    @sridharkaushik9290 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is not Brahmān (ब्रह्मान्) but Brahman (ब्रह्मन्).
    I am amazed such an accomplished person as Edwin Bryant should make this mistake.

  • @kenjones102
    @kenjones102 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy chit. I was just watching Swami Medhananda talking on Bryant's treatment of the Yoga Sutras by Patanjali.

  • @sridharkaushik9290
    @sridharkaushik9290 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sorry but some words are being mispronounced.
    It is Samādhāna (समाधान), not Samadhana (समधान).

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Professor is not reading Vedic Mantras and is not an Indian. Pronunciation does not matter much here imho.
      - Mayank

    • @chantharekrishna8398
      @chantharekrishna8398 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Doesn't matter

    • @akumar7366
      @akumar7366 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you have a Vlog you would like us all to watch?

  • @gat3010
    @gat3010 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hello, will you continue on patanjali's mystical powers?

  • @ShyamSunder-gt4uq
    @ShyamSunder-gt4uq หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where can i get these pdfs that you are referring? Would you be able to provide any link ?

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unfortunately not as this is copyright material.
      The books are from Swami Vireswarnanda and Swami Adidevananda
      - Mayank

  • @me-ou8rf
    @me-ou8rf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How similar Advaita is to Eleatic Philosophy ?
    Advaita Brahman sounds similar to Eleatic Being
    Eleatics also tried to deal with illusion thing with Zeno's Paradox and stuff

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Quite similar, but I'd say Advaita has more groundwork since it can refer to Upaniṣadas. Eleatic philosophy is trying to use Nyāya more it seems, while Vedānta is about confirming something that's already there.
      - Mayank

  • @beauforda.stenberg1280
    @beauforda.stenberg1280 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are the specific works that are being read from?

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Vedānta Sūtras of Śankara and Rāmānuja.

    • @Dual-Universe
      @Dual-Universe หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EdwinBryantOfficial who translated them from sanskrit to english

    • @EdwinBryantOfficial
      @EdwinBryantOfficial  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dual-Universe Swami Vireswarnanda & Swai Adidevananda