London by Samuel Johnson | Part 2 | Complete Analysis

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @sayan23majumder
    @sayan23majumder 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for helping us with this explanation

    • @ValesAndTales
      @ValesAndTales  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My pleasure

    • @sayan23majumder
      @sayan23majumder 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ValesAndTales as you mention and as it's a Dramatic Monologue then as per one of the characteristics of this genre the narrator should not associated with the poet or the author then I can emphasize that It is by no means possible that Thales and Samuel Johnson are the same person as it would then violate its own characteristic.

    • @ValesAndTales
      @ValesAndTales  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sayan23majumder good observation Sayan.
      There are few points to be considered
      1. London is not a dramatic monologue in the strictest sense although it has few characteristics of D.M.
      2. D.M delves into the in-depth exploration of individual psyche like my last duchess but here the primary focus is social critique
      3. Thales does not represent Johnson but Richard Savage, friend of Johnson who left London to travel to Wales.
      Hope it helps!

    • @sayan23majumder
      @sayan23majumder 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ValesAndTales thank you ma'am

  • @pavleenkour3705
    @pavleenkour3705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The explanation is genial 🎉

  • @ValesAndTales
    @ValesAndTales  ปีที่แล้ว +2

    King Henry V not IV
    Supple Gaul is for Frenchman

    • @sayan23majumder
      @sayan23majumder 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yah what I'm also thinking about