LOVE my 16! I was going to get something larger until I hauled 26 large paintings in the back. Now Im Fitting it for car camping. While it may be a little loud, it certainly isn't disturbingly so. Zippy, easy to park and great gas milage!
I don't usually make negative reviews, but back in the real world, I have this car and it's a wonderful car. Picky little comments: it's so loud, slow windows, oh my! In the real world, these have never troubled me. I am not the speediest driver but there is really enough pick up to pass someone I want to pass. I do not need to reach for ear plugs. I get 35 mpg city and 40+ highway. You can put a a ton of stuff in the magic seats or even sleep in it even if you were 6 ft tall. The seats move around for long or tall items. It's also reliable. My best cars have been Hondas. Compare this to Versa or a Yaris not a BWM.
Astrog8tr. Yes it has sufficient acceleration for any purpose and while go all day at 80 mph or more and loading the car with 850 pounds will not slow it down noticeably. I found it troubling loud though. The HVAC fan is also loud at maximum speed, and the AC is weak compared to most cars; takes longer to cool you down. The car could definitely benefit from more sound and heat insulation. I don't think mentioning these are picky. The rear seats have as much leg room as medium and full sized cars. However the bump for the gas tank intrudes into the driver's space for placing her feet. In most cars, to prevent your leg and foot from cramping up on a long drive, you can turn on cruise control, take your right foot off the throttle, move it back toward the seat, and rest it flat on the floor, poised to move toward the brake if need be. On this car, unless your legs are very short and you drive with your seat almost all the way forward, you can only bring you foot back a little bit before your heal bumps into the bump for the gas tank. You can't get your foot into a comfortable position. You have to leave it on the throttle pedal.Thus one of the main advantages of having cruise control is negated.
Never use econ mode. That is number one problem there. It greatly reduces throttle response and keeps revs to absolute minimum thus making you so much slower and sluggish. This car with a manual will do 8 to 8.5 seconds to 60 which frankly is about the same as my 2012 CRV and is more than adequate.
I bought mine new, and did lots of research beforehand. Knew about the cabin noise. That was never an issue with me. Small engine, yes, but car only weighs 1948 lbs, so the pickup is better than I expected on highways. I wanted a tiny car after years of owning big, 8 cylinder monsters that needed repair way too often. This car is Honda's smallest, but if they made an even smaller one, I'd buy it! Great little car!
I own one of these and it is pretty stinking fast with the CVT. It has a surprising amount of pulling power and feels peppy as long as it's going above 20mph (otherwise it feels like a tank). I don't get why people say it's so slow. I average 41 mpg combined city and highway with big hills.
I have a Honda Fit 2010. I still drive it and I definitely recommend it. Still looks and runs great. No mechanical issues whatsoever! I mainly do the basic maintenance items like replacing brakes, oil changes, transmission fluid, spark plugs, etc. You have to keep in mind when buying this car that it's still a small car with a small engine, so performance would not be similar to larger class cars. The fuel economy is great at 5.5 L/100 Km or (43 mpg) on the highway. For long term ownership, this car will get your money's worth.
I have a 2016. One major complaint I have is the suspension. Any passengers I’ve had in the back seat always make a comment about how rough it rides. Not as bad in the front, but I noticed it right from the start. Rougher than any car I’ve ever owned. Pretty much love everything else about it. Well, the windshield wipers need a variable intermittent on them, but now I’m just being picky. Would definitely recommend this car to others and would buy one again.
This car is brilliant in the twisties. It's no miata for sure, but it's surprisingly good for a stock setup. I take it on touge runs. If it was rwd and had a ton of HP I'd be scared to do spirited driving on the twisties, but in this car, it's relatively safe to push it to the limit.
My 2011 Sport has 230K.... and going strong. It will out handle virtually any car on the road. Fast? ... well once you are moving, it will stay at that speed all day. Love my "micro van". PS: CVT's suck, get a stick...
i have the 2010 exclusive model, and it’s pretty quick i would say. it weights next to nothing, so it gets up to speed pretty easily. at least by european standards
I got an EX with a manual last year, but the fuel economy is supposed to be better with the CVT. Im in Kentucky, so it's all mpg here. I'm routinely getting 42, or 5.6L/100km. The overall economy has been around 37.6/6.25 over 28,000 miles/45km. So don't settle for the CVT drone and lack of driver involvement because of the economy, unless the CVT owners are also getting 15-25% better than rated. When you were showing the rear seat comfort, don't forget the release allows the seat back to recline to a second stop a few degrees further rearward. Nice review.
Car reviews....guy number one,....the engine is a racket. Review guy number two,...the engine has a pleasing tone. Car reviewer number three,...this car, I don't recommend, but it's the manufacturer top seller. Car reviewer number four, I recommend that car, (nevermind that after 50,000 miles, it burns oil) Folks,....they know nothing.
Frank E I agree that SOME reviewers know very little. Also, It is obvious that some "reviewers" are really salesmen trying to sell that car, and are only pretending to do a review. Many reviewers are not pretending to KNOW which car is better; instead it is clear they are simply describing the car and stating personal preference, as is the current reviewer regarding the HVAC control knobs. He isn't saying clunky knobs are better; he is saying that is what the car has, and that he LIKES them better. I think he's crazy, but in most of the countries of the "free world," that level of craziness is legal and socially acceptable; you will neither get arrested or brought to a mental ward, for stating it. So I am not going to complain about him to the authorities. Unfortunately though, in many countries you could legally be placed in a mental ward simply on the OPINION of 2 physicians, without any substantiation beyond "the patient had a peculiar way of laughing that made me uneasy." France is notorious for locking up people simply because they seem a bit peculiar. The US is not far behind France. The sound of an engine is to a great extent a matter of personal preference. Yes you can measure sound level in decibels and provide a graph of what the decibel levels are at every audible frequency, for each of several different engine speeds, but from seeing that data it would be very hard to tell whether you would be pleased by that engine.
Fit with CVT has plenty of pickup for merging onto highway, passing. Yes, it makes a racket, but it's not the engine making a racket, it's the CVT. Despite the racket, it does a great job. You put the throttle pedal to the floor, the engine rapidly gets up to near redline, where it has the most horsepower, stays put at that RPM, and the CVT does all the work for you of getting the wheels to catch up with engine. It smoothly changes pulley ratios until the car is going as fast as you want. SMOOTHLY - \tThe car doesn't jerk you around like in an old fashioned planetary gear automatic, or a manual. You do not get a "sensation" of accelerating - but you are indeed accelerating. Before you know it, you have reached the speed you want. As far as the big clunky buttons for the HVAC you have to constantly fiddle with them to maintain a comfortable temperature. Why would anyone prefer that over a set-and-forget thermostat? - what is called digital "climate control" in motor vehicle marketing terminology. These thermistor based thermostats are fantastic, and inexpensive. Yes, they often charge a lot extra to upgrade to the climate control, even though the digital systems are probably actually cheaper to implement than the big clunky buttons. The headlights on this car are really bad. No side-light when turning onto side-streets. Inadequate light in both lowbeam and high beam.
the digital climate control ones require a slew of motors and servos to control the different flaps to adjust air temperature. On this new fit the manual climate control is still fully cable operated. No motors or servos to go wrong! Not even a recirc button. It's also a cable operated slider
One could design a simplified climate control where, for cooling, the thermostat controls nothing more than a relay to turn the compressor on and off. No cable, just an electrical wire. Adding fan speed control does not need a cable either, only an electrical connection. You could switch between outside air and recirc manually, the way it is done now. No need for it to be tied into the thermostat. For heating, you could switch to heating mode manually. The way the heat is controlled now is by turning a knob to move a flap to mix cool air with hot air. So for heat you might need a servo to move the flap, but not for AC, I don't think. I suppose the heat might also be controlled. Not sure how heat works exactly. The hot engine coolant - does it flow though the same fins that the coolant flows through (the evaporator fins)? And is there already a servo to control the flow of coolant - circulate it through the engine only, or open a valve to send the flow of liquid to the car's passenger cabin before it goes back to the engine. I think this is ALREADY a servo, is it not, or is the coolant ALWAYS directed into and out of the passenger cabin, and only the flow of air is changed, to flow over the fins in the passenger cabin, is changed - with a simple cable-operated flap - instead of the air bypassing the fins? Any way I pretty sure you don't need any additional servos to control the AC thermostatically. OK, I looked it up, generally there is a valve to direct the engine coolant through the "heater core" when heat is called for. The valve is operated by an electric relay? If so, operating this valve themostatically would only require wiring electricity to it - no cables. Perhaps some cars have servos to operate the mixing flap, to mix cool air with hot air, but such an arrangement wouldn't seem to be absolutely necessary to have thermostatically controlled heat.
I have a 2009 Honda Fit, and I agree about the headlights- except I find the brights to be bright enough... but of course I can’t drive around with them on constantly.
Theodore Zuckerman no servos. Water thermostat is used to regulate flow through radiator. The temperature control knob controls how much air flows over the heater matrix (a flap that forces air through it, called a blend flap). The AC compressor is already regulated by a thermistor on the cold side to stop it freezing (below 2c and it turns off, comes on again as it warms up). So on minimum fan speed it bounces off this minimum temperature limit. The fan speeds chosen at the factory are well chosen
I love how the tire pressure sensor light is already on 😂 You really nitpicked some weird shit... it’s like you were expecting a Ferrari or something... and the window speed?? Honestly? 😂
12 months in; 2018 EX w/6-SPEED manual IS THE ONLY WAY to enjoy this ride. I personally think the Sport Edition looks slightly more pleasing to the eye cosmetically. But the EX gives more bang (features) for the buck. And I believe this model is the last of the V-TEC's without the turbo. (which is important to me) Thanks for reading.
4:40 And remember the best feature of this car is that you can pick up lots of hitchhikers andhaveplentyofroomfortheir backpacks and sleeping bags with room to spare.
Hello Max. I've been unemployed for 10 months now and am about to lose my home to foreclosure, so I've been looking at this car at our local dealership and thinking about getting it to live in until I'm back on my feet. When I looked at it several weeks ago I didn't think to check out the USB and 9V ports; does it have more than one of each in the 2020 version, do you know? I was hoping that I'd be able to power not only my phone but my laptop as well as a kettle for heating water.
I own the 2017 model and I can confirm everything the guy said. Not fast enough. A little too noisy (speaking of engine and wind too). I can tell you evry review tells you while the cvt is shit the manual shift is state of the art. But I also think the magic seat features haven't been properly shown. First one shoul show the "tall mode" on both seat. Second, the "relax-refresh mode" allows you to lower the seatback completely, creating a perfectly flat surface. You just have to push it or raise the backseat and put it in position again after you lowered the frontseat seatback)
The "Sport trim" of the CVTy comes with a 7 speed manual mode and paddle shifters. I would be curious if that would make that 130 HP CVT a bit more fun and less annoying on the freeway.
As would I, there has only been on CVT that I liked, that was the 2018 Honda Accord. Hopefully, some of that software and programming would carry over from the Accord to the Fit Sport
Update on that: I testdrove the EX CVT, and it was buckets of fun.. in fact, I actually bought the Sport. When it is just in drive, it's a little less than peppy, especially with the Eco Mode on, but in sport mode, the the noisy engine becomes less annoying, and more of a throwback to that old-school Honda fun.
The cvt is quite responsive. And peddle certainly useful. It can be used on normal D mode. So very handy to shift when you want pass car. But the cvt is quite responsive. What I do not like is the sound of the cvt. Very depressing. I might try to buy a aftermarket intake to make it sound better.
Great review! I own a 2015 version of this vehicle and you highlighted all the pros and cons I have about it. However, that “if I were a woman” and vibration commentary was completely unnecessary and probably disrespectful to your viewers. Great background scenery 👌🏼
Agreed. The face is not exactly handsome, but, if I ever do buy one, I think that simply painting the front "bumper" cross-section in the body color could improve the looks a lot! I think that the Yaris iA is likely to be more fun to drive (but probably no faster) than the Fit, but can't match the practicality/utility of the hatchback Fit, especially with its "Magic" seats. Finally, I guess the price would be thousands cheaper too.
Steven James DeBlasi toyota yaris is way behind the Fit in every category.. You can Google the two comparison Fit has the highest rating in every level compare to yaris and compare to the other small cars Fit is the best small car... Yaris don't come near to that.. Google it 😊
LOVE my 16! I was going to get something larger until I hauled 26 large paintings in the back. Now Im Fitting it for car camping. While it may be a little loud, it certainly isn't disturbingly so. Zippy, easy to park and great gas milage!
I don't usually make negative reviews, but back in the real world, I have this car and it's a wonderful car. Picky little comments: it's so loud, slow windows, oh my! In the real world, these have never troubled me. I am not the speediest driver but there is really enough pick up to pass someone I want to pass. I do not need to reach for ear plugs. I get 35 mpg city and 40+ highway. You can put a a ton of stuff in the magic seats or even sleep in it even if you were 6 ft tall. The seats move around for long or tall items. It's also reliable. My best cars have been Hondas. Compare this to Versa or a Yaris not a BWM.
Astrog8tr. Yes it has sufficient acceleration for any purpose and while go all day at 80 mph or more and loading the car with 850 pounds will not slow it down noticeably.
I found it troubling loud though. The HVAC fan is also loud at maximum speed, and the AC is weak compared to most cars; takes longer to cool you down. The car could definitely benefit from more sound and heat insulation. I don't think mentioning these are picky.
The rear seats have as much leg room as medium and full sized cars. However the bump for the gas tank intrudes into the driver's space for placing her feet. In most cars, to prevent your leg and foot from cramping up on a long drive, you can turn on cruise control, take your right foot off the throttle, move it back toward the seat, and rest it flat on the floor, poised to move toward the brake if need be. On this car, unless your legs are very short and you drive with your seat almost all the way forward, you can only bring you foot back a little bit before your heal bumps into the bump for the gas tank. You can't get your foot into a comfortable position. You have to leave it on the throttle pedal.Thus one of the main advantages of having cruise control is negated.
I have this car, and the engine isn't loud at all. And it's amazing what I can get into it.
The lift up back seat is wonderful. Perfect for hauling my rottweiler to the vet without ruining the upholstery.
Never use econ mode. That is number one problem there. It greatly reduces throttle response and keeps revs to absolute minimum thus making you so much slower and sluggish. This car with a manual will do 8 to 8.5 seconds to 60 which frankly is about the same as my 2012 CRV and is more than adequate.
That's why it's called "Econ" mode...
I bought mine new, and did lots of research beforehand. Knew about the cabin noise. That was never an issue with me. Small engine, yes, but car only weighs 1948 lbs, so the pickup is better than I expected on highways. I wanted a tiny car after years of owning big, 8 cylinder monsters that needed repair way too often. This car is Honda's smallest, but if they made an even smaller one, I'd buy it! Great little car!
they do!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Brio
I have a 2013 fit with a manual transmission, it’s a much more enjoyable ride. It’s reminiscent of my crx days!
Just got a 2017 manual. I freaking love it. It does remind me of mid 90's Honda fun.
I own one of these and it is pretty stinking fast with the CVT. It has a surprising amount of pulling power and feels peppy as long as it's going above 20mph (otherwise it feels like a tank). I don't get why people say it's so slow. I average 41 mpg combined city and highway with big hills.
I have a Honda Fit 2010. I still drive it and I definitely recommend it. Still looks and runs great. No mechanical issues whatsoever! I mainly do the basic maintenance items like replacing brakes, oil changes, transmission fluid, spark plugs, etc.
You have to keep in mind when buying this car that it's still a small car with a small engine, so performance would not be similar to larger class cars. The fuel economy is great at 5.5 L/100 Km or (43 mpg) on the highway. For long term ownership, this car will get your money's worth.
Thanks for your experienced insight !
I have a 2016. One major complaint I have is the suspension. Any passengers I’ve had in the back seat always make a comment about how rough it rides. Not as bad in the front, but I noticed it right from the start. Rougher than any car I’ve ever owned. Pretty much love everything else about it. Well, the windshield wipers need a variable intermittent on them, but now I’m just being picky. Would definitely recommend this car to others and would buy one again.
I got a fit as a commuter car after ownining a wrangler jku for 5 years.
I always laugh when people comment that this car has some road noise.
ammre ulrich Ha, too true. Test drove a 2020 wrangler 2-door with soft top. The new Fit is definitely quiet in comparison.
This car is brilliant in the twisties. It's no miata for sure, but it's surprisingly good for a stock setup. I take it on touge runs. If it was rwd and had a ton of HP I'd be scared to do spirited driving on the twisties, but in this car, it's relatively safe to push it to the limit.
My 2011 Sport has 230K.... and going strong. It will out handle virtually any car on the road. Fast? ... well once you are moving, it will stay at that speed all day. Love my "micro van". PS: CVT's suck, get a stick...
i have the 2010 exclusive model, and it’s pretty quick i would say. it weights next to nothing, so it gets up to speed pretty easily. at least by european standards
I got an EX with a manual last year, but the fuel economy is supposed to be better with the CVT. Im in Kentucky, so it's all mpg here. I'm routinely getting 42, or 5.6L/100km. The overall economy has been around 37.6/6.25 over 28,000 miles/45km. So don't settle for the CVT drone and lack of driver involvement because of the economy, unless the CVT owners are also getting 15-25% better than rated.
When you were showing the rear seat comfort, don't forget the release allows the seat back to recline to a second stop a few degrees further rearward. Nice review.
Car reviews....guy number one,....the engine is a racket. Review guy number two,...the engine has a pleasing tone. Car reviewer number three,...this car, I don't recommend, but it's the manufacturer top seller. Car reviewer number four, I recommend that car, (nevermind that after 50,000 miles, it burns oil)
Folks,....they know nothing.
Frank E I agree that SOME reviewers know very little. Also, It is obvious that some "reviewers" are really salesmen trying to sell that car, and are only pretending to do a review.
Many reviewers are not pretending to KNOW which car is better; instead it is clear they are simply describing the car and stating personal preference, as is the current reviewer regarding the HVAC control knobs. He isn't saying clunky knobs are better; he is saying that is what the car has, and that he LIKES them better. I think he's crazy, but in most of the countries of the "free world," that level of craziness is legal and socially acceptable; you will neither get arrested or brought to a mental ward, for stating it. So I am not going to complain about him to the authorities. Unfortunately though, in many countries you could legally be placed in a mental ward simply on the OPINION of 2 physicians, without any substantiation beyond "the patient had a peculiar way of laughing that made me uneasy." France is notorious for locking up people simply because they seem a bit peculiar. The US is not far behind France.
The sound of an engine is to a great extent a matter of personal preference. Yes you can measure sound level in decibels and provide a graph of what the decibel levels are at every audible frequency, for each of several different engine speeds, but from seeing that data it would be very hard to tell whether you would be pleased by that engine.
Fit with CVT has plenty of pickup for merging onto highway, passing. Yes, it makes a racket, but it's not the engine making a racket, it's the CVT. Despite the racket, it does a great job. You put the throttle pedal to the floor, the engine rapidly gets up to near redline, where it has the most horsepower, stays put at that RPM, and the CVT does all the work for you of getting the wheels to catch up with engine. It smoothly changes pulley ratios until the car is going as fast as you want. SMOOTHLY - \tThe car doesn't jerk you around like in an old fashioned planetary gear automatic, or a manual. You do not get a "sensation" of accelerating - but you are indeed accelerating. Before you know it, you have reached the speed you want.
As far as the big clunky buttons for the HVAC you have to constantly fiddle with them to maintain a comfortable temperature. Why would anyone prefer that over a set-and-forget thermostat? - what is called digital "climate control" in motor vehicle marketing terminology. These thermistor based thermostats are fantastic, and inexpensive. Yes, they often charge a lot extra to upgrade to the climate control, even though the digital systems are probably actually cheaper to implement than the big clunky buttons.
The headlights on this car are really bad. No side-light when turning onto side-streets. Inadequate light in both lowbeam and high beam.
Theodore Zuckerman this is a very well review you just did!
the digital climate control ones require a slew of motors and servos to control the different flaps to adjust air temperature. On this new fit the manual climate control is still fully cable operated. No motors or servos to go wrong! Not even a recirc button. It's also a cable operated slider
One could design a simplified climate control where, for cooling, the thermostat controls nothing more than a relay to turn the compressor on and off. No cable, just an electrical wire. Adding fan speed control does not need a cable either, only an electrical connection. You could switch between outside air and recirc manually, the way it is done now. No need for it to be tied into the thermostat. For heating, you could switch to heating mode manually. The way the heat is controlled now is by turning a knob to move a flap to mix cool air with hot air. So for heat you might need a servo to move the flap, but not for AC, I don't think. I suppose the heat might also be controlled. Not sure how heat works exactly. The hot engine coolant - does it flow though the same fins that the coolant flows through (the evaporator fins)? And is there already a servo to control the flow of coolant - circulate it through the engine only, or open a valve to send the flow of liquid to the car's passenger cabin before it goes back to the engine. I think this is ALREADY a servo, is it not, or is the coolant ALWAYS directed into and out of the passenger cabin, and only the flow of air is changed, to flow over the fins in the passenger cabin, is changed - with a simple cable-operated flap - instead of the air bypassing the fins? Any way I pretty sure you don't need any additional servos to control the AC thermostatically. OK, I looked it up, generally there is a valve to direct the engine coolant through the "heater core" when heat is called for. The valve is operated by an electric relay? If so, operating this valve themostatically would only require wiring electricity to it - no cables. Perhaps some cars have servos to operate the mixing flap, to mix cool air with hot air, but such an arrangement wouldn't seem to be absolutely necessary to have thermostatically controlled heat.
I have a 2009 Honda Fit, and I agree about the headlights- except I find the brights to be bright enough... but of course I can’t drive around with them on constantly.
Theodore Zuckerman no servos. Water thermostat is used to regulate flow through radiator. The temperature control knob controls how much air flows over the heater matrix (a flap that forces air through it, called a blend flap).
The AC compressor is already regulated by a thermistor on the cold side to stop it freezing (below 2c and it turns off, comes on again as it warms up). So on minimum fan speed it bounces off this minimum temperature limit. The fan speeds chosen at the factory are well chosen
I love how the tire pressure sensor light is already on 😂
You really nitpicked some weird shit... it’s like you were expecting a Ferrari or something... and the window speed?? Honestly? 😂
12 months in; 2018 EX w/6-SPEED manual IS THE ONLY WAY to enjoy this ride. I personally think the Sport Edition looks slightly more pleasing to the eye cosmetically. But the EX gives more bang (features) for the buck. And I believe this model is the last of the V-TEC's without the turbo. (which is important to me) Thanks for reading.
Manual transmission makes this car fun to drive. Practical and fun = win. I would only get CVT if I didn't know how to drive a stick.
Guess my wife should stop mocking me for calling it a baby minivan.
4:40 And remember the best feature of this car is that you can pick up lots of hitchhikers andhaveplentyofroomfortheir backpacks and sleeping bags with room to spare.
Hello Max. I've been unemployed for 10 months now and am about to lose my home to foreclosure, so I've been looking at this car at our local dealership and thinking about getting it to live in until I'm back on my feet. When I looked at it several weeks ago I didn't think to check out the USB and 9V ports; does it have more than one of each in the 2020 version, do you know? I was hoping that I'd be able to power not only my phone but my laptop as well as a kettle for heating water.
the manual makes it more engaging
The manual is for car enthusiasts who still want the novelty and close connection with their cars. Cvt's do just fine for regular drivers.
I HAVE A 09 AND IT IS AN EXCELLENT CAR.
Nice car. Reliable as all hek.
I own the 2017 model and I can confirm everything the guy said. Not fast enough. A little too noisy (speaking of engine and wind too). I can tell you evry review tells you while the cvt is shit the manual shift is state of the art. But I also think the magic seat features haven't been properly shown. First one shoul show the "tall mode" on both seat. Second, the "relax-refresh mode" allows you to lower the seatback completely, creating a perfectly flat surface. You just have to push it or raise the backseat and put it in position again after you lowered the frontseat seatback)
And fun to drive
This guy is awesome!! Love the background music.
The "Sport trim" of the CVTy comes with a 7 speed manual mode and paddle shifters. I would be curious if that would make that 130 HP CVT a bit more fun and less annoying on the freeway.
As would I, there has only been on CVT that I liked, that was the 2018 Honda Accord. Hopefully, some of that software and programming would carry over from the Accord to the Fit Sport
Update on that: I testdrove the EX CVT, and it was buckets of fun.. in fact, I actually bought the Sport. When it is just in drive, it's a little less than peppy, especially with the Eco Mode on, but in sport mode, the the noisy engine becomes less annoying, and more of a throwback to that old-school Honda fun.
The cvt is quite responsive. And peddle certainly useful. It can be used on normal D mode. So very handy to shift when you want pass car. But the cvt is quite responsive. What I do not like is the sound of the cvt. Very depressing. I might try to buy a aftermarket intake to make it sound better.
that transmission logic has been on the fit's CVT since the first gen!
Are you in Jasper? Nice background for review.
+Lucius Wong the bow valley! Not too far away from jasper, probably a 3 hour drive.
Mines quiet.
Great review! I own a 2015 version of this vehicle and you highlighted all the pros and cons I have about it. However, that “if I were a woman” and vibration commentary was completely unnecessary and probably disrespectful to your viewers. Great background scenery 👌🏼
Jose F. R. Ren. Yes..gotta watch those kind of references these days...!
IDGAF what other people think if it get what I need done i'll use it
Lighten Up ! The comment will probably boost sales for this fine little/big car.
I'd be really curious to see what you think of the Toyota (Mazda) Yaris iA, especially as compared to the Fit.
I would like to try out that car too, certainly isn’t an attractive car, but I’m interested to see what a Toyota badged Mazda is like to drive!
Agreed. The face is not exactly handsome, but, if I ever do buy one, I think that simply painting the front "bumper" cross-section in the body color could improve the looks a lot!
I think that the Yaris iA is likely to be more fun to drive (but probably no faster) than the Fit, but can't match the practicality/utility of the hatchback Fit, especially with its "Magic" seats.
Finally, I guess the price would be thousands cheaper too.
Steven James DeBlasi toyota yaris is way behind the Fit in every category.. You can Google the two comparison Fit has the highest rating in every level compare to yaris and compare to the other small cars Fit is the best small car... Yaris don't come near to that.. Google it 😊
Nice 👍🏼
Minivan wtf, hatchback fr
Quit making up stuff. Its a sub compact with extra space.
Not looking forward to cleaning the windows
Don't know what the econ button does ?????
Should have gotten the 6 speed. Much more zippy.
i hateeeee my cvt i never buy another car with cvt
nice review but eww :\ i dont understand why people would actually get base model cars
snowwolfx97 money. Duh.
snowwolfx97 too busy filling up bank accounts and building real net worth.
Pilotx86 it's only about 2k more for top model 😴
snowwolfx97 Base model has no sunroof, and no GPS. Never needed either one.
Frank Lamagna is all about the open experience more glass more the car feels open wish they make a fully glass top fit would be amazing