ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

How to Engineer Wood Diaphragms | Sheathing | Nailing | FULL EXAMPLE

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2022
  • Part 2 of our FULL BUILDING design example. We tackle the design and engineering of the wood diaphragm, including sheathing, nailing type and spacing. This is a full wood design example under seismic design criteria.
    Imagine what 5000 engineers can accomplish collectively... lets find out together.
    👇 SUBSCRIBE TO KESTÄVÄ ENGINEERING’S TH-cam CHANNEL 👇
    / @kestava_engineering
    For business inquiries email: kestavallc@gmail.com
    Connect with me on LinkedIn 👇
    / richard-racz-pe-620b1792
    Brave Browser 👇
    brave.com/
    (I am not affiliated or receive compensation from Brave)
    Music I Use 👇
    www.epidemicso...
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Disclaimers: Richard Racz, P.E. does not hold the title "structural engineer". Any claim of it in the videos or descriptions is unintentional and is superseded by the title "civil engineer" in the states of MA and OR.
    The Kestävä TH-cam page is intended for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in, or provided through, this TH-cam page is intended to constitute advice, or to serve as a substitute for the advice of an engineering professional. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.
    Under no circumstances will Kestävä be responsible or liable in any way for any content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of any content communicated on this TH-cam page.
    #wooddesign #structuralengineering #kestavaengineering

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @Kestava_Engineering
    @Kestava_Engineering  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We don't cover chord forces yet!

  • @stevenauyeung1410
    @stevenauyeung1410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    stuff they dont teach you in school, bless you

  • @sugv10
    @sugv10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello! where is the part 1? please

  • @Benata
    @Benata 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Been looking into plates and reading timoshenko and that famous monogram. What is your opinion? Rourke timoshenko monograms or fem analysis of shells.

  • @ehabaltimimi660
    @ehabaltimimi660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even I passed the exam, but I am still like your examples, good job my friend.

  • @alit250
    @alit250 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Richard, awesome video! I needed this while designing a diaphragm and shear wall. I didn't quite understand how you came up with the 48 ft "zone A" regions. I didn't get where the 48 ft number came from. Cheers

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you can break up your diaphragms into sections when you have a large enough diaphragm. as you get closer to vertical lateral elements (shear walls braced frames etc) your shear demand in the diaphragm increases, but the opposite is true as you get to the mid point of the diaphragm between vertical lateral elements. so at a point you can call out a lighter diaphragm to save on nailing and potentially sheathing thickness. take a look at your shear diagram to help you determine where you can create another "zone" cheers!

  • @stevielloyd9687
    @stevielloyd9687 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I'm loving your videos, super helpful! Maybe I am interpreting something incorrectly, but at 2:35 you say our W=256' and our L=120', but then you do the aspect ratio calculation (a=L/W), you do a=256'/120' which would be W/L according to how you defined your variables. I'm brand new to this so I want to make sure I'm understanding it correctly!

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  ปีที่แล้ว

      its always W/L in the direction your looking at. so if you have a rectangle, then in one direction your aspect ratio will be high and in the other direction your aspect ratio will be very low. think about if the diaphragm was a piece of soft foam and your trying to bend the foam. the direction that is harder to bend has the lower aspect ratio because its stiffer.

  • @SouthBayEngr
    @SouthBayEngr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What’s the title of the Part 1 video?

    • @b0bbydigital14
      @b0bbydigital14 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that's what I'm saying

  • @jin9724
    @jin9724 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, I just wonder where is part 1 of this example that you are referring to in this vid? Thank you!
    [Update] Nvm. I found it. Thank you for what you do and this is really great vids. Thanks!

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks for tuning in Jin and im glad you found it!

    • @sugv10
      @sugv10 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, where is part 1? i can't find it

    • @mpokharel2010
      @mpokharel2010 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sugv10 th-cam.com/video/3cddppsFMa0/w-d-xo.html

  • @SouthBayEngr
    @SouthBayEngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You said 256’ is the width. Isn’t that the length? And 120 is the width?

    • @SouthBayEngr
      @SouthBayEngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, what actually dictates which side is the length and which is the width? The NDS shows that the length is perpendicular to the lateral force.

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in short - the length and width swap with each other depending on the direction you are applying load!

  • @user-lc1md7pj9f
    @user-lc1md7pj9f 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where's the part one?

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      on my channel! check out the wood design collection

  • @samuelrobertson8354
    @samuelrobertson8354 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want to see pictures of the assemblies so bad