Well done. I quite agree public and private partnerships are needed but as it stands these entities are not similarly motivated. So they continue to clash. 2 Education also needs an open check for innovation.
Yes, the differences of goals between public education and the corporate world are one of the key points that it’s lagging education behind what we expect from it in this fast changing society.
Thanks a lot for watching the documentary. We are very pleased you liked and that felt connected to the main idea! Is an important topic for the future of our societies.
I know. That’s seems one of the positive takes in implementing AI in schools. Together with personalized learning. Anyways, I ask myself: who will have access to those tools and who don’t?
I wish I could have an answer to the common question my kid will always ask me; "Why should I go to school?" I went to school to eliminate poverty, that is no longer the reality. And the education system especially in Africa is not adopting fast to use of technology. We are still regurgitating facts and assuming this is education...
Thanks guys, as a teacher I'm Bias, The science classroom has changed a lot, we're practical, we question, we have opportunities for debates, presentations and project work for very interested students. What would school look like with AI involved? I am conscious of a great deal of criticism of the "system". Without solution and vision of a New Kind of schooling, this will never beat the Human beings that welcome you as a community and family every day. It's not the 1990s in education anymore guys. Peace!
Yes, it’s not an easy task to find new ideas for education. I think one of the main issues is related to how the whole decision making process it’s too slow. Education nowadays ( and by the way other governmental institutions) are like dinosaurs on a speed race. So, even if there are good ideas it’s too difficult to implement them.
@@PlasticoFilm Finland has a ton of great innovations in the schooling area. Also, Japan, as from my understanding, for grade 3 and earlier, they teach mannerisms, critical thinking and many other skills in becoming thinking well balanced human beings before they get into stuff like math, reading, writing and so on. At the very least for language classes they should teach people phonics, and for math, the box method and BEDMAS.
@@PlasticoFilm , don't be mistaken, I belive AI tools can be VERY useful in education. But the way they say we are following an XVIII century model mean that they need to learn a bit more about school curriculum. Of course there is a need for upgrade, but you cannot dismiss the purpose of it and just try to teach skills to kids....
@@bancarroutaI understand now what you mean. Yes, we can’t reduce education to a bunch of skills. Nonetheless I think that a bit more dynamism or speed to adapt wouldn’t hurt. I think our institutions in general need a bit more or speed to adapt to the new challenges of technology.
hummm.... I think we have too much of a "perfect" view of AI in Education. If not acknowledged, we will be sorely disappointed with the perceived positive impact of AI. All of the scenarios/demonstrations showing AI in the classroom are idealistic - they show a perfect learning environment with a perfect teacher (AI) and perfect learners, but learning environments are far from perfect. The presence of a perfect teacher does not mean perfect students will be/are present in the classroom. What about the student who shows indiscipline during the AI-guided lesson? The student who snaps his pencil and flings the book against the wall? That indiscipline may be grounded in something outside the classroom (nurture) or in the innate wiring of the individual (nature). The presence of the perfect teacher (AI), does not mean that the range of personal and social trials a student faces suddenly disappears. This glowing elevation of AI technology as THE HOPE of education may yet be another example of deception surfacing in education.
I think that AI will be more a tool that will help teacher get the job done ( or half done) with the everyday less time and resources that education has at their disposal.
@@PlasticoFilm But in most if not all the documentaries exploring AI in the classroom, AI isn't being presented to the viewer as a teacher's "helper", it is being presented as a teacher's very possible and likely "replacement". If it were only oriented as a helper, then there would be no need to explore the threat to jobs in the same documentaries. When AI developers speak of "improving AI", they are speaking and working with the sole aim of making it just as good or better than a human being. If that's the case, it is very likely that the covert aim is to be a replacement. So even in that context there is vile deceit at work.
I know what you mean but I think that the idea of the replacement of the teachers comes ( at least where I live, in Germany) from the reality that there are always less people that want to do the job. So, basically there are a lot of teachers positions empty and doesn’t seem it will change in the future. I think that is one of the major reasons why AI is presented in some cases as a teacher substitute.
humm.... I know what you mean here too. The tragedy is that when a critical point of too many unfillable teaching vacancies is reached, it will be mandated (i.e., made a law), that the field of teaching be completely computerised. They will then, most likely, add justifications such as " doing so is more efficient and economical" and "this is the unavoidable direction of education". It leads me to wonder, rather deeply, if the whole phenomenon of the "unaddressed frustrations of teachers" being seen in education systems around the world is not a covert, orchestrated attempt to achieve the end of a fully computerised global teaching system. Humans are capable of such plans. I live on a tiny far-flung island in the west called Barbados. So our perspective of the global change is an interesting one.
Yes, ti avoid that, we need to make the teacher position attractive again with better salaries and conditions. Even if I think is very difficult. I don’t think there is a big plan behind, I believe mostly of the times is more human mistakes, laziness and misunderstandings than hidden intentions. Regards to the Barbados 🌞🏝️
Excellent documentary of what should be the flagships of the relationship between AI and education in the near future.
Thanks! I’m very happy you liked! 👍😎
I wonder why this has few views...this is so educative
Is the algorithm made to hide this information from reaching many people???
Thanks Victor! I’m really happy you liked!! Yes, it’s difficult to bring people over to the documentary. Anyway, thanks again for watching!!
And if you like it you can also check our new channel: youtube.com/@minidocs-plasticofilm?si=UwITZ-Vv0yYb78Wz
Well done. I quite agree public and private partnerships are needed but as it stands these entities are not similarly motivated. So they continue to clash. 2 Education also needs an open check for innovation.
Yes, the differences of goals between public education and the corporate world are one of the key points that it’s lagging education behind what we expect from it in this fast changing society.
Great documentary! Congratulations to the entire production team!
Thanks a lot!
Desde Venezuela yo te digo: ¡GRACIAS!, ¡Excelente documental!
Gracias a usted! Estamos muy contentos les haya gustado. Saludos desde Berlín!
I actually cried in the end. Great documentary
Thanks a lot for watching the documentary. We are very pleased you liked and that felt connected to the main idea! Is an important topic for the future of our societies.
AI-powered tools can automate administrative tasks, freeing up teachers to focus on instruction and student engagement.
I know. That’s seems one of the positive takes in implementing AI in schools. Together with personalized learning. Anyways, I ask myself: who will have access to those tools and who don’t?
I wish I could have an answer to the common question my kid will always ask me; "Why should I go to school?"
I went to school to eliminate poverty, that is no longer the reality. And the education system especially in Africa is not adopting fast to use of technology. We are still regurgitating facts and assuming this is education...
Africa is doomed everyone for his own ,kids should go to school to know how to read and write ,nothing more .
Thanks guys, as a teacher I'm Bias, The science classroom has changed a lot, we're practical, we question, we have opportunities for debates, presentations and project work for very interested students. What would school look like with AI involved? I am conscious of a great deal of criticism of the "system". Without solution and vision of a New Kind of schooling, this will never beat the Human beings that welcome you as a community and family every day. It's not the 1990s in education anymore guys. Peace!
Yes, it’s not an easy task to find new ideas for education. I think one of the main issues is related to how the whole decision making process it’s too slow. Education nowadays ( and by the way other governmental institutions) are like dinosaurs on a speed race. So, even if there are good ideas it’s too difficult to implement them.
@@PlasticoFilm Finland has a ton of great innovations in the schooling area. Also, Japan, as from my understanding, for grade 3 and earlier, they teach mannerisms, critical thinking and many other skills in becoming thinking well balanced human beings before they get into stuff like math, reading, writing and so on. At the very least for language classes they should teach people phonics, and for math, the box method and BEDMAS.
5:20 1st university by christianity 😅😅 i doubt
Thanks for commenting. I seem remember we used the plural in the film. Meaning not the first one but one of them.
I'm pretty sure that these people don't know what an educational curriculum is and why it exists.
What do you mean exactly by that?
@@PlasticoFilm , don't be mistaken, I belive AI tools can be VERY useful in education. But the way they say we are following an XVIII century model mean that they need to learn a bit more about school curriculum. Of course there is a need for upgrade, but you cannot dismiss the purpose of it and just try to teach skills to kids....
@@bancarroutaI understand now what you mean. Yes, we can’t reduce education to a bunch of skills. Nonetheless I think that a bit more dynamism or speed to adapt wouldn’t hurt. I think our institutions in general need a bit more or speed to adapt to the new challenges of technology.
This is not news! Just about everything has been discussed since 2000s.
Yes, the problems in education are quite old. Nothing has changed since the 50s, at least.
11:10
hummm.... I think we have too much of a "perfect" view of AI in Education. If not acknowledged, we will be sorely disappointed with the perceived positive impact of AI. All of the scenarios/demonstrations showing AI in the classroom are idealistic - they show a perfect learning environment with a perfect teacher (AI) and perfect learners, but learning environments are far from perfect. The presence of a perfect teacher does not mean perfect students will be/are present in the classroom. What about the student who shows indiscipline during the AI-guided lesson? The student who snaps his pencil and flings the book against the wall? That indiscipline may be grounded in something outside the classroom (nurture) or in the innate wiring of the individual (nature). The presence of the perfect teacher (AI), does not mean that the range of personal and social trials a student faces suddenly disappears. This glowing elevation of AI technology as THE HOPE of education may yet be another example of deception surfacing in education.
I think that AI will be more a tool that will help teacher get the job done ( or half done) with the everyday less time and resources that education has at their disposal.
@@PlasticoFilm But in most if not all the documentaries exploring AI in the classroom, AI isn't being presented to the viewer as a teacher's "helper", it is being presented as a teacher's very possible and likely "replacement". If it were only oriented as a helper, then there would be no need to explore the threat to jobs in the same documentaries. When AI developers speak of "improving AI", they are speaking and working with the sole aim of making it just as good or better than a human being. If that's the case, it is very likely that the covert aim is to be a replacement. So even in that context there is vile deceit at work.
I know what you mean but I think that the idea of the replacement of the teachers comes ( at least where I live, in Germany) from the reality that there are always less people that want to do the job. So, basically there are a lot of teachers positions empty and doesn’t seem it will change in the future. I think that is one of the major reasons why AI is presented in some cases as a teacher substitute.
humm.... I know what you mean here too. The tragedy is that when a critical point of too many unfillable teaching vacancies is reached, it will be mandated (i.e., made a law), that the field of teaching be completely computerised. They will then, most likely, add justifications such as " doing so is more efficient and economical" and "this is the unavoidable direction of education". It leads me to wonder, rather deeply, if the whole phenomenon of the "unaddressed frustrations of teachers" being seen in education systems around the world is not a covert, orchestrated attempt to achieve the end of a fully computerised global teaching system. Humans are capable of such plans. I live on a tiny far-flung island in the west called Barbados. So our perspective of the global change is an interesting one.
Yes, ti avoid that, we need to make the teacher position attractive again with better salaries and conditions. Even if I think is very difficult. I don’t think there is a big plan behind, I believe mostly of the times is more human mistakes, laziness and misunderstandings than hidden intentions. Regards to the Barbados 🌞🏝️