This 2x2 and 4x4 cubes are game-changing. They not only make me turn accurately, but they are so loud and catchy that we are thankful that GAN exists. With the brilliant tile design, nobody can ever peel the stickers off. They can't even turn the cube so the cube will always be solved. But if you can't scramble it you can't solve it, like a 1x1. Absolutely ridicu- er, amazing. Love the work Rubik's is doing.
Hey J perm! I found out your channel a year ago and I just wanna say, that your doing amazing! Only because of you, I am able to solve a 2 by 2, 3 by 3 and a 4 by 4 under a minute! keep up the great work!
just found out about your channel and just wanna say thank you, before watching your videos i used begginer method but now i use f2l i still am pretty slow but getting faster and i am learning 2 look pll and oll and your tutorials are THE BEST so thanks
You’re welcome or I’m sorry Take this as you wish Well you could probably get a decent estimate without taking into affect the deceleration. Velocity would be V=x/t We’re trying to find x (displacement). You could get the velocity by using the cube as a reference and take the amount of frames (time) it takes to move a certain amount of pixels (displacement ). Then get the time before we hear the box hit the ground (ignoring the height of the table and the amount of time it takes for the the box to fall). Then you could finally figure out how far the table extends. Though you wouldn’t know how far the table extends in the other direction. I would actually calculate it, but frankly I don’t want to
J Perm, can you do a video answering FAQ on Rubiks brand Rubiks Cubes? Like why they don’t have a beginner friendly cube like these but also very professional ones like the ones GAN makes? Or why Rubiks is so bad in the first place and what they should/can/need to do to have better Rubik’s cubes?
There is now a new version of the Rubiks 3x3 (probably spinmaster?) That actually seems pretty good to me. It is my quietest official Rubiks brand cube and seems to turn pretty well. Would be nice to see your impressions.
Hoi, Dylan! When I started cubing we used to call the CFOP method "Friedrich Method". Ever heard about that? All your content is great and this is hands down the best cubing channel easily. Peace!
8:12 my guesses: speed: 3+8+45 = 55s rubiks: 6+13+60 = 1min21s time wasted due to hardware limitations: 26s edit: Actual Results [spoilers]: speed: 4+9+35 = 48 rubiks: 7+18+dnf = rubiks brand is bad
You should create a discord server so we can ask questions and make suggestions but also have somewhere else to talk about cubing other than your comment section. I like your channel, good job! :D
Hey j perm big fan, I know you probably won’t see this but I just want you to know that you got me into cubing and really helped me with it I went From solving 3 minutes to 20 seconds and I just want to thank you for that
maybe to see which core magnets are stronger on the gan 11 m pro, you could put triangle magnets on one side and octagon magnets on the other and then turn the right and left side to see which one moves the middle layer. also, thanks 4 the great video!
I really like the Rubik's brand. I know they're slow and not simple, but they're very nice for people who have no idea what they're doing. It helped me go through the algorithms very slowly and then once I got faster I upgraded to a much better cube... But with the 3x3s when I started really getting into it, I got a speedcube right away and I kept overturning the crap out of it and losing my place and it was very frustrating. So I enjoy starting with a much slower cube that requires time.
J perm, I watched your video series of how you started cubing. It inspired me to get a Pyramid and a Rubix cube. I had a LOT of fun. Thank you for inspiring me to a new world I never knew about!
I think they should put a instruction booklet on how to assemble the cubes. That way, the begginers will look inside the instruction and assemble their cube.
Hi Jperm! I have a 3 by 3 scramble I think you would like( f2l and oll skip scramble) Scramble: D' F' L2 D2 F2 B R2 F2 U2 R2 F U2 L2 D2 F' L2 U2 If you try it a few times you'll get it 😉
@@wojtekpollok5782 I am not completely sure how it was made because I saw it in another TH-cam video. If you look up “F2L and OLL skip scramble, that should be the video 📹
Hello, please consider doing this challenge: solve a monochrome shape-mod of Rubik's cube WITHOUT LOOKING AT ALL. Example of puzzles like that: the heart shaped puzzle (easier level), ghost cube (more difficult level). This means you have to rely on touching and feeling the pieces, and be careful with similar pieces. The heart puzzle has some pairs like that and wouldn't make smooth surface with the wrong pieces or wrong orientation of the centers.
I absolutely love your content, and I've always rooted for you and how you've taken cubing to whole new audiences by making it as accessible and understandable as you possibly can. But I feel like you always over-exaggerate when a cube is "bad," i.e. turns poorly, is sluggish, or just not your style. Cubing hardware across the board is exceptional now, from pretty much any speedcube manufacturer, and while that does allow for the threshold of quality to evolve and make for newer puzzles to have to achieve far more to make a niche for themselves, I feel like your criticisms of cubes like the new Rubik's 4x4 forget just how far cubing hardware has come in the last 12+ years. It's nowhere near as bad as the Eastsheen, the Meffert's 4x4, or even the Maru 4x4. I absolutely love your content, and I always look forward to each upload, and I know a lot of the criticism your hurl at these cubes is in good fun, but the context and perspective of how good hardware is now could be a bigger talking point in these impression/review videos. I'll admit, though - that 2x2 makes no sense. Literally just 2 more screws and springs and that cube could be so much more usable. I'd love to see if cutting the rivets and replacing them with screws and springs would make the cube even remotely better.
The difference is that when we judge cubes now, we do it in the context of their current competition. Sure the rubiks 4x4 is better than a 4x4 from 10 years ago, but if you’re buying a 4x4 today, you make the decision by comparing it to current hardware. Because if this there’s no point in comparing a rubiks 4x4 to a 4x4 from last decade
I understand your criticism, as these cubes are good compared to how bad they could get. But I make the comparison in the context of what's currently available. If you had an eastsheen 4x4 now, I'd still say it's bad because you could easily get one that is much better.
The Rubik’s brand 4x4 compared to something like the meilong or even gan 460 m it’s comparable to and from memory it’s maybe a bit better then the meilong 4x4. I feel like this would be a good main for beginners and amateurs but maybe people like Max park,Felix Zendeg and Yusheng Du would good on this cube with some setup. Do you Agree?
yeah... yesterday i bought that exact same 4 x 4 and it was terrible, today it exploded after i tried to solve it, not even forcing to corner cut, just regular turning and the the thing broke
I have a few questions for your next Q&A 1. I am averaging around 20-28 seconds and I am about halfway through with learning full pll, and I am working on speeding up with look ahead (I'm pretty consistent but slow), but I have been averaging this for a few months ( I got my first sub 20 a few days ago), any tips to average sub 20? 2. I just can't believe how good you are at cubing, and I'm dying to know, why and when did you start cubing? 3. How do you know which position to put the last layer in to perform an E perm correctly, whenever I do it, I usually have to do an H perm after it to solve the cube? 4. lastly, how can you make money off of cubing, I looked it up and all that came up was making bets with people out in public, but that sounds boring, any ideas? I just want to say that I am amazed how much you can teach one person, and thank you for teaching me everything I know about cubing, you made me so good that I convinced myself to buy a gan 11 m pro, so thank you.
When you look at the e perm the front stickers on the corner should match up with the left or right corresponding edge sticker and that's when you know it won't be h perm after the e perm
I have the originals from the 1980's when they first were sold, plus the 1983 Professor's 5x5x5 cube. The 1981 4x4x4 was named Rubik's Revenge, and its internals was a slotted sphere and long narrow legs on the center pieces, which made it fragile. The Professor's cube had a internal structure like a cube within a cube, and later 4x4x4 like Eastsheen used a similar internal structure. I also have a Chinese "Magic" 6x6x6 with corners and outer edges same size as rest of pieces.
Video idea: Mod the Gan 11 M Pro with maglev, as a test to test out how good maglev really is, or just because it is fun. How to do it: maybe steal the Gan 12's tensioning, or just the magnets and remove the springs from the gan 11.
Hi J perm I just wanted to say I love your videos and I've been subbed since 400k. Keep up the unbelievable work and hope you can read Chinese ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥇
Love you Dylan Wang you're the youtuber who loves cubes more than money, never loses confidence, make funny videos and have 1M subscribers. I am waiting for the Gold Play Button. Anyways Keep up and love you froom Nepal
Hey, Jperm You should do a challenge where you try to solve a scrambled cube to the cube in a cube pattern. It's hard and I don't think you've done a video about this before.
Goes to show the hardware reliance of higher-level cubers. It's neat to see what happens when a professional cuber meets a cube that doesn't next to break at the seams to let him do every turn only half way and isn't full of magnets. Tbf, I don't disagree with using speedcubes, but seeing how someone deals with a cube that isn't so free is fun.
i bought the 2x2 rubik's mini today and i made it rotate better, you could just adjust the settings of the rubiks cube mini rotation, there is a screw on the orange side like u did saw, if you screw the screw in to max, the cube will rotate very hardly, if u screw the screw out a little, it will be faster and better corner cutting than just calling it "bad", and when u unscrewed it, u unscrewed it a lot, that why it fell apart
![RUBIK'S "SPEED" CUBE 2X2 [VS] TOYS R US RUBIK'S 2X2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CglnCFnz98Y/mqdefault.jpg)
![RUBIK'S "SPEED" CUBE 2X2 [VS] TOYS R US RUBIK'S 2X2](/img/tr.png)
![My Rubik's Cube Collection! [200+ Cubes]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MyDnyfS7c1g/mqdefault.jpg)
Hes not scared on cuting his finger cuz itl Hurt but bc of demonitycason
yeah
@@JPerm hello mr i perm
@@thecube0293 its L perm
@@JPerm I love your vids I learned intuitive f2l, 2 look oll and PLL from you please reply
SO TRUE
Now we just need Jperm to main Rubik's brands.
And that's why he's better than max park
@@pecareca6735 confirmed!
Agree
Agreed
@@JPerm so do it
If that 4x4 released like 10 years ago it would actually be one of the best 4x4s in the market lol
This 2x2 and 4x4 cubes are game-changing. They not only make me turn accurately, but they are so loud and catchy that we are thankful that GAN exists. With the brilliant tile design, nobody can ever peel the stickers off. They can't even turn the cube so the cube will always be solved. But if you can't scramble it you can't solve it, like a 1x1. Absolutely ridicu- er, amazing. Love the work Rubik's is doing.
Best Comment!
GAN 2x2 and 4x4 also not really good
Gan does 4x4?
@@tarinachow8779 yeah the 460, but it was a total flop. The inner layers were terrible.
Rubik's should get rid of the ball core and use magnets on their cubes
That 4x4 blows my mind, after 40 years they finally made a decent one. Shows there's always hope for improvement
Ok now I need to get that 4x4…
Hi Kewbix! First reply!
You kewbix big fan
why did you need that 4x4 😂😂
Congrats on 100k
That's a good Idea considering your hoard of other rubiks brands 🤣
"You can see them shaking with fear. No, that's just cuz they don't have magnets in them"
- J Perm, 2022
9:12
I laughed too much at this😂☠️
Challenge: Every time you solve a 3x3 a random finger is removed (or a finger of your choosing) and can no longer touch the cube on the next solve
You are also not allowed to get any blood on the cube
@@sillowillo HOL UP
You’re guaranteed to just accidentally touch it with the forbidden finger at some point
@@PikKraken8 WAIT A MINUTE
Hey J perm! I found out your channel a year ago and I just wanna say, that your doing amazing! Only because of you, I am able to solve a 2 by 2, 3 by 3 and a 4 by 4 under a minute! keep up the great work!
also him: joined 7 months ago
@@unknown-wn3ez you can watch youtube without an account
i'm french and i love how you say words in french like "niveau de défi"
At least they moved away from the terrible ball core on the 4x4. Also the new 3x3 has a spider core now!
Oh wait really? Noice!👍
Is the new 3x3 different to the gan rubiks speed cube? Visually looks similar
@@the1barbarian781 I think so, for one it's almost impossible to take apart.
@@the1barbarian781 Yes its different
I recently bought that 2x2 and was blown away at how badly it locks up. Looks like you felt the pain, too.
Same
J perm keeping us entertained♥️♥️ you are reason why I started to cube 3 years ago😊 and I am quite good now. Thank you Dylan
just found out about your channel and just wanna say thank you, before watching your videos i used begginer method but now i use f2l i still am pretty slow but getting faster
and i am learning 2 look pll and oll and your tutorials are THE BEST so thanks
2 years later speed check what's the average
5:21 if we measure the velocity and deceleration of that packaging, we can finally work out how far the table extends beyond the screen
You’re welcome or I’m sorry
Take this as you wish
Well you could probably get a decent estimate without taking into affect the deceleration. Velocity would be V=x/t
We’re trying to find x (displacement). You could get the velocity by using the cube as a reference and take the amount of frames (time) it takes to move a certain amount of pixels (displacement ). Then get the time before we hear the box hit the ground (ignoring the height of the table and the amount of time it takes for the the box to fall). Then you could finally figure out how far the table extends.
Though you wouldn’t know how far the table extends in the other direction.
I would actually calculate it, but frankly I don’t want to
@@snow17048 dude. Are you a physicist or something?
@@jlpainter1151 Nope, just a high schooler who is studying for her physics final next week 😂
@@snow17048 lol. Your good
@@snow17048High school is gonna be HARD BRUH
Fun fact, the new 3x3 has screws and springs on all centres and can reverse corner cut better than the tornado v2m
I have it and I set it up lol
@@hycubing same lol
real?
@@__________________________MARK yes
Which 3×3 cube y'all talking about
"Our only hope is for Rubik's to partner with YJ or MoYu"
-J Perm 2022
Yes
Yes
Moyu is prob the best company rn
Imagine they partner with V-Cube
That moment when J Perm beats your 4x4 PB by 5 seconds...with a RUBIK'S BRAND!!!
When you realize that jperm solves 2x2, 3x3 & 4x4 faster than you solve a 3x3
J Perm, can you do a video answering FAQ on Rubiks brand Rubiks Cubes? Like why they don’t have a beginner friendly cube like these but also very professional ones like the ones GAN makes? Or why Rubiks is so bad in the first place and what they should/can/need to do to have better Rubik’s cubes?
JPerm spoke in French. I can die peacefully.
O CANADA
There is now a new version of the Rubiks 3x3 (probably spinmaster?) That actually seems pretty good to me. It is my quietest official Rubiks brand cube and seems to turn pretty well. Would be nice to see your impressions.
I have it, it works really well
Oh and I wanna see the better Rubiks speed cube
Same i have it
@@E46SedanGamingno its not a speedcube
You got me into cubing now it's been a year Now I can Solve the cube in 18 seconds you are a legend Dylan thank you so much for everything!
18 buuuuhhh do you do 2lll?
@@tripily5533 18 is good
@@electronium2667 yes that's what I mean sorry
@@tripily5533 no bro I know CFOP
@@electronium2667 thanks
Jperm: *Quits during a relay*
Me: Impossible
Hoi, Dylan! When I started cubing we used to call the CFOP method "Friedrich Method".
Ever heard about that?
All your content is great and this is hands down the best cubing channel easily. Peace!
it's called Fridrich coz it was invented by Jessica Fridrich and they are the same
It’s common name of cfop in slavic countries
0:15 got me idk why 😂😂
8:12 my guesses:
speed: 3+8+45 = 55s
rubiks: 6+13+60 = 1min21s
time wasted due to hardware limitations: 26s
edit: Actual Results [spoilers]:
speed: 4+9+35 = 48
rubiks: 7+18+dnf = rubiks brand is bad
J Perm, fierce defender of French Canadian rights.
The rubiks 4x4 looks like it has amazing modding potential.
You should create a discord server so we can ask questions and make suggestions but also have somewhere else to talk about cubing other than your comment section.
I like your channel, good job! :D
2:10 satisfaction 😄
#asmrcube
The two by twos are actually good because you can solve them easy
Hey j perm big fan, I know you probably won’t see this but I just want you to know that you got me into cubing and really helped me with it I went From solving 3 minutes to 20 seconds and I just want to thank you for that
cant wait to main these it will give me such good times!!!!
I always like your reaction to new rubiks brands 😂
maybe to see which core magnets are stronger on the gan 11 m pro, you could put triangle magnets on one side and octagon magnets on the other and then turn the right and left side to see which one moves the middle layer. also, thanks 4 the great video!
love the video!!
you started my cubing career thank you continue your work!❤️
10:42 J Perm just accidentally messed up the rubik's 4x4😂😂😂😂😱😱
I really like the Rubik's brand. I know they're slow and not simple, but they're very nice for people who have no idea what they're doing. It helped me go through the algorithms very slowly and then once I got faster I upgraded to a much better cube... But with the 3x3s when I started really getting into it, I got a speedcube right away and I kept overturning the crap out of it and losing my place and it was very frustrating. So I enjoy starting with a much slower cube that requires time.
J perm, I watched your video series of how you started cubing.
It inspired me to get a Pyramid and a Rubix cube.
I had a LOT of fun.
Thank you for inspiring me to a new world I never knew about!
Your videos are always helpful and entertaining and inspired me to start cubing again. Thank you J Perm, keep up the great work :)
Jperm your the most underrated youtuber your creative and I’m say your the most creative person and the best you really are the best
J perm, can you please get the Yj yushi v2 m 6x6 because I want to know your opinion on it
i think you should try and solve an atlasminx from coren puzzle
What would you think Jperm's reaction would be if these cubes were better than any speedcube?
I'd start by breaking my PBs
True. I didn't think through that. That's the most reasonable answer.
Maybe I should buy a better 7x7.
"wow these cubes are better than any speedcube" something like that
@@doodoopoo Also true. You and Jperm can answer a question with a very intelligent answer,
@@JPerm lol if speedcubes disappeared the wr will be 11.4
Great vid like always
I think they should put a instruction booklet on how to assemble the cubes. That way, the begginers will look inside the instruction and assemble their cube.
ew no
Yea but then less people will want it
technically in terms of difficulty to solve the rubik's 4x4 is the best cube
I'm surprised that Rubik's made a bad 2x2 but good 4x4. I would expect it to be the other way around.
I guess they tried harder since the old Rubik's 4x4s were soooooooo bad.
@@JPerm I have the older rubik's 2x2 and it was probably better than the new one but it had no corner cutting
I learned beginner cfop because of you thank you so much ❤️
Hi Jperm! I have a 3 by 3 scramble I think you would like( f2l and oll skip scramble) Scramble: D' F' L2 D2 F2 B R2 F2 U2 R2 F U2 L2 D2 F' L2 U2
If you try it a few times you'll get it 😉
Well... this is an awesome scramble, but did you make it by youself or was it mad by a computer?
@@wojtekpollok5782 I am not completely sure how it was made because I saw it in another TH-cam video. If you look up “F2L and OLL skip scramble, that should be the video 📹
Just came home from school, was gona watch minecraft but was like "THIS IS MUUUUCH MORE IMPORTANT" By the way, UPLOAD MORE VIDEOS!!!!!
The moment when Jperm's Rubiks brand solves are faster than your PB's...
I like how my 2x2 pb is 3.47 except that it is a rubbish time
@@kamranhussain2210 That is exactly the same as the 3x3 world record
@@kamranhussain2210 3.47 is good compared to my 7 sec pb
@@wolf219_yt I know that, that is why I like it
@@cactus2 yeah, but back when I practiced 2x2 I averaged 8-12 seconds
Hello, please consider doing this challenge: solve a monochrome shape-mod of Rubik's cube WITHOUT LOOKING AT ALL.
Example of puzzles like that: the heart shaped puzzle (easier level), ghost cube (more difficult level).
This means you have to rely on touching and feeling the pieces, and be careful with similar pieces. The heart puzzle has some pairs like that and wouldn't make smooth surface with the wrong pieces or wrong orientation of the centers.
5:53 Cubehead be like
when will JPERM review the smart cube like Monster go AI, Moyu AI, and Gan 356 i carry?
I absolutely love your content, and I've always rooted for you and how you've taken cubing to whole new audiences by making it as accessible and understandable as you possibly can.
But I feel like you always over-exaggerate when a cube is "bad," i.e. turns poorly, is sluggish, or just not your style. Cubing hardware across the board is exceptional now, from pretty much any speedcube manufacturer, and while that does allow for the threshold of quality to evolve and make for newer puzzles to have to achieve far more to make a niche for themselves, I feel like your criticisms of cubes like the new Rubik's 4x4 forget just how far cubing hardware has come in the last 12+ years. It's nowhere near as bad as the Eastsheen, the Meffert's 4x4, or even the Maru 4x4.
I absolutely love your content, and I always look forward to each upload, and I know a lot of the criticism your hurl at these cubes is in good fun, but the context and perspective of how good hardware is now could be a bigger talking point in these impression/review videos.
I'll admit, though - that 2x2 makes no sense. Literally just 2 more screws and springs and that cube could be so much more usable. I'd love to see if cutting the rivets and replacing them with screws and springs would make the cube even remotely better.
The difference is that when we judge cubes now, we do it in the context of their current competition.
Sure the rubiks 4x4 is better than a 4x4 from 10 years ago, but if you’re buying a 4x4 today, you make the decision by comparing it to current hardware. Because if this there’s no point in comparing a rubiks 4x4 to a 4x4 from last decade
I understand your criticism, as these cubes are good compared to how bad they could get. But I make the comparison in the context of what's currently available. If you had an eastsheen 4x4 now, I'd still say it's bad because you could easily get one that is much better.
@@JPerm I feel like I missed it in the video but how much did the 4x4 cost?
The Rubik’s brand 4x4 compared to something like the meilong or even gan 460 m it’s comparable to and from memory it’s maybe a bit better then the meilong 4x4. I feel like this would be a good main for beginners and amateurs but maybe people like Max park,Felix Zendeg and Yusheng Du would good on this cube with some setup. Do you Agree?
Edit I think the meilong may be better but it has been a long time since unwatched a video of Jperm unboxing and/or using the meilong 4x4
8:51 3 edge already made after the slice and not even single parity in 4x4 wth🤯🤯
Yeah! Thats pretty lucky!
hey jperm everyone in my school that knows how to solve a 3x3 has learnt it from you! (I also learnt from you) So thanks!
7:32 That's faster than my PB 😭😭
Its 2 seconds faster than mine
:(
Bruh how did u find my comment 1 mo th later bruh 😂😂
@@rio1628 timed beta
@@NobodyYKIN 7 months 🗿🗿
Its crazy cause i found it a year later@@rio1628
Congrats on 1 million. Sorry for the late congratulations btw.. I got a lot of homework to do these days...
Who wants him to solve a Redi CUbe with no help?
yeah... yesterday i bought that exact same 4 x 4 and it was terrible, today it exploded after i tried to solve it, not even forcing to corner cut, just regular turning and the the thing broke
Pog so early
Can you please make a video when you solve all your 3x3’s and you also time it like this so j perm can see it better🙏👌
I watch this at school when it can 3 minutes after it came out
I have a few questions for your next Q&A
1. I am averaging around 20-28 seconds and I am about halfway through with learning full pll, and I am working on speeding up with look ahead (I'm pretty consistent but slow), but I have been averaging this for a few months ( I got my first sub 20 a few days ago), any tips to average sub 20?
2. I just can't believe how good you are at cubing, and I'm dying to know, why and when did you start cubing?
3. How do you know which position to put the last layer in to perform an E perm correctly, whenever I do it, I usually have to do an H perm after it to solve the cube?
4. lastly, how can you make money off of cubing, I looked it up and all that came up was making bets with people out in public, but that sounds boring, any ideas?
I just want to say that I am amazed how much you can teach one person, and thank you for teaching me everything I know about cubing, you made me so good that I convinced myself to buy a gan 11 m pro, so thank you.
When you look at the e perm the front stickers on the corner should match up with the left or right corresponding edge sticker and that's when you know it won't be h perm after the e perm
finally a 4x4 that actually turns better than the old one
I'm actually going for the record for longest time solving a 3x3 Rubik's cube. I started in 2010 and haven't touched it since.
We all should be proud because i think if rubiks brand dont exist speedcube wont exist too
I have the originals from the 1980's when they first were sold, plus the 1983 Professor's 5x5x5 cube. The 1981 4x4x4 was named Rubik's Revenge, and its internals was a slotted sphere and long narrow legs on the center pieces, which made it fragile. The Professor's cube had a internal structure like a cube within a cube, and later 4x4x4 like Eastsheen used a similar internal structure. I also have a Chinese "Magic" 6x6x6 with corners and outer edges same size as rest of pieces.
8:19
The first 50 seconds
The second 1 minute 20 seconds
Video idea: Mod the Gan 11 M Pro with maglev, as a test to test out how good maglev really is, or just because it is fun.
How to do it: maybe steal the Gan 12's tensioning, or just the magnets and remove the springs from the gan 11.
hi can you make a 3bld at scs virtual cube? i think it might be fun
Hi J perm I just wanted to say I love your videos and I've been subbed since 400k. Keep up the unbelievable work and hope you can read Chinese ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥇
we all want jperm do more square 1 to make him feel good every time he sloves it
this is fun to watch while im learning oll
Jperm solving a 2x2, 3x3 ans 4x4 in one stopwatch is better than my highest record on solving a 3x3 speedcube
no matter how bad these are we still gotta appreciate rubik's brand for bringing new cubers into the community.
Nice video. The relay part was the most interesting, and it's a good idea for Rubik's to have a partnership with Moyu.
I mean they partnered with gan before, but went back to making their own stuff after that
love this epic unboxing of the new rubiks cubes!
I love how loud the Rubik’s cube was!
Please review the new Rubik's speed cube, it is sooo much more quiet and faster (at least that what I've heard). Also good content, keep it up :D
Love you Dylan Wang you're the youtuber who loves cubes more than money, never loses confidence, make funny videos and have 1M subscribers. I am waiting for the Gold Play Button.
Anyways Keep up and love you froom Nepal
I’m getting my fan 2x2 skewb and a 3x3 for my friend tomorrow and I really enjoyed this video keep it up
I learned beginner cfop because of you thank you so much! I love you
In the future, the gan 12 maglev and 11 m pro will be treated old. lol
i love how the rubiks brand 4x4 inner layers turn better tha the gan 460's inner layers
Hey, Jperm
You should do a challenge where you try to solve a scrambled cube to the cube in a cube pattern. It's hard and I don't think you've done a video about this before.
I think stores have a new rubiks brand 3x3 not made by gan, and apparently they're pretty good
I just ordered a J Perm 2 x 2 and a bag! Can't wait till they come
J Perm:I don't think that fits for a Rubik's Brand
Also him: Takes another SpeedCubeShop mat
Goes to show the hardware reliance of higher-level cubers. It's neat to see what happens when a professional cuber meets a cube that doesn't next to break at the seams to let him do every turn only half way and isn't full of magnets. Tbf, I don't disagree with using speedcubes, but seeing how someone deals with a cube that isn't so free is fun.
That 2x2’s corner cutting is basically if a Magic 2x2 cube was invented
When I was younger I had a 4x4 that popped and it sat in a zip-lock bag for 2 years until it got thrown away.
Hey J perm, try the bad Amazon cubes
i bought the 2x2 rubik's mini today and i made it rotate better, you could just adjust the settings of the rubiks cube mini rotation, there is a screw on the orange side like u did saw, if you screw the screw in to max, the cube will rotate very hardly, if u screw the screw out a little, it will be faster and better corner cutting than just calling it "bad", and when u unscrewed it, u unscrewed it a lot, that why it fell apart
J PERM YOU ARE THE BEST I LOVE YOUUU AND YOUR VIDSSS 👑👑👑❤️❤️
Can you try taping an edge and a corner piece together and trying to solve a cube and then tape more blocks