The Problem with the Royal Oak

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 339

  • @jackrice4064
    @jackrice4064 ปีที่แล้ว +1738

    I don't very often find myself 150 meters underwater with my high-end watch but that's just me

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      Watch depth ratings have no safety factor, most things like elevator need 3x safety factor or at least double. So if you dive to 100m you need 200m resistance. And 50m watches also leak after a certain amount of time too. You should never swim in 50m rated watches

    • @blendertimelapses9577
      @blendertimelapses9577 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@melody3741i still wouldn't swim 50 meters underwater, when's the last time you did that?

    • @pete6705
      @pete6705 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you’re in the hot tub with hookers or gold diggers you want to know that the best possible water resistance is there

    • @bosniakedisniksic
      @bosniakedisniksic ปีที่แล้ว +64

      ​@@blendertimelapses9577 did you not read what he said? He said he wouldn't even swim in it. As in at a foot depth. I wouldn't trust getting it wet

    • @ciuwandy9238
      @ciuwandy9238 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Water resistant on watches is not the “safe” distance that you can go. It’s tested with a controlled, distilled water, no waves, a very short amount of time, very consistent water with a manually operated machine. So if you go swimming with it, you will splashing around in salty and wavy water which is not consistent. It’s the same when you run in a controlled environment with profesional stand and comparing it to running down a hill where there are little oxygen.
      I hope that clear things up and why you need a minimum of 100m or water resistant to go swimming without getting water inside and potentially rust the movement inside which cost you hundreds to thousands to repair for a mechanical/automatic watch.

  • @stuartsneddon7738
    @stuartsneddon7738 ปีที่แล้ว +957

    Yes I often go 70m deep wearing a $50000 watch. Who doesn't.

    • @tvnja
      @tvnja ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Everyone who has a dive watch should.
      Just like every Jordan owner should play basketball.

    • @kenyongalovich6252
      @kenyongalovich6252 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tvnja what about the people who wear vans or blazers or SB’s that don’t skate or running shoes that don’t run you do realize that Air Force 1’s and converse were also originally basketball shoes I have many Jordan’s and I play basketball but I think if you just like the look of the shoe you can absolutely wear them and never have to step on a court

    • @tvnja
      @tvnja ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kenyongalovich6252 I own romaleos and I use them exclusively for the gym and not even for every exercise. I'd never wear them outside a gym.
      But that's just me.

    • @kenyongalovich6252
      @kenyongalovich6252 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tvnja yes I have gym shoes that I only wear to the gym that’s a different circumstance because a gym shoe isn’t stylish or integrated in the fashion culture like Jordan’s and vans I’m not saying it’s weird to have shoes for certain things and I have the newer basketball sneakers I only use for basketball but Jordans are outdated and seen more as a streetwear shoe but also saying that you can’t wear vans if you don’t skate or you can’t wear Jordan’s if you don’t hoop is completely absurd

    • @Mo_Mo_
      @Mo_Mo_ ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Just because it says it is WR up to 50m doesn't mean it waterproof you shouldn't even go swimming with 5 ATM watches. Reason being is the pressure in the water that builds up when swimming making it very probable that your watch will let water in and ruin the watch. Heck even cheap Casios have 100m WR 😅

  • @ronniefnd
    @ronniefnd ปีที่แล้ว +281

    Crap. I was so gonna buy one of these to learn to scuba dive with. I guess I can't do either now.

    • @TheEchelon
      @TheEchelon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You know nothing about watches, do you? 50 metres rating means you can’t even swim with it reliably. At any depth.

    • @TheMahin95
      @TheMahin95 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      He was being sarcastic 😂​@@TheEchelon

    • @appleman29
      @appleman29 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      should delete your comment lol@@TheEchelon

    • @T3rm3nator
      @T3rm3nator 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheEchelonMy frederique constant vitality had 5 Atm rating
      Did swim and dive 3 meters underwater, the watch is fine.
      Also the sun burst blue dial would put many expensive watches a run for its money.

  • @motionplays9452
    @motionplays9452 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    Tf dose a number matter when you will never take it for a swim

    • @illuminati8532
      @illuminati8532 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wear mine in the pool just fine salt waters not real good for the metal over time but a pool harmless

    • @rollin60z
      @rollin60z ปีที่แล้ว

      I wear my Rolex to swims everytime i go

    • @jonlikesplanes
      @jonlikesplanes ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rollin60zif it has 100m or over it’s ok.

    • @CeeWorld69
      @CeeWorld69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@illuminati8532Why tf would you even do that anyway???

    • @illuminati8532
      @illuminati8532 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@CeeWorld69 it’s a watch not a priceless medallion

  • @suitedandbooted6612
    @suitedandbooted6612 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    For people who don’t know, 50m basically means it’s okay if it gets slightly wet while washing your hands. 100m is okay for pool swimming, 300m+ would be okay to dive with at normal scuba depths of

    • @thefreshprinceofbelleairbeach
      @thefreshprinceofbelleairbeach ปีที่แล้ว +2

      50m with a screw down crown is fine for surface splashing

    • @DragonKing3010
      @DragonKing3010 ปีที่แล้ว

      I fucking hate this myth and people that keep positing it as fact.

    • @lud6441
      @lud6441 ปีที่แล้ว

      How about for showering?

    • @suitedandbooted6612
      @suitedandbooted6612 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@lud6441 realistically, you shouldn’t wear a watch while showering or in a hot tub. The heat and pressure combined is very hard on the rubber seals. If you were going to shower with a watch, I would say at least 100m. But honestly, you should take your watch off to shower so you can wash your wrist. Your arm gets sweaty under the watch band. You need to wash it. 😂 If you keep your watch on 24/7, it will get all nasty with dead skin grime. Also, how long are you in the shower that you need to check your watch? 😂 lol.

    • @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available
      @ThisHandleWasTheOnly1Available 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@suitedandbooted6612How are you supposed to time the 5 min necessary for the conditioner to remain in your hair if you don't have a watch? Huh?

  • @simon-orlandosinghai
    @simon-orlandosinghai ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ap bracelets always go so well with the watch, probrably my favourite high end watch brand

  • @TroyCote
    @TroyCote 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That Vacheron Overseas Blue gets me every time.

  • @steamroller257
    @steamroller257 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's due to the octagonal bezel secured by white golden screws, which are amazing but too thin and weak to deliver a waterproof superior to 50m.
    Differently from the Patek and Vacheron, the AP bezel is not part of the case but a separated piece.

  • @Peter-tc3ep
    @Peter-tc3ep ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Unfortunately 50m water resistance does not mean you can dive with your watch.
    “50M Water Resistance: Wearable around sinks, during swimming, athletic sports, in shallow waters, but not while snorkeling or scuba diving.
    100M Water Resistance: Wearable around sinks, during swimming, poolside diving, snorkeling, but not while jet-skiing or scuba diving.”
    The reason most actual dive watches are 200m water resistance or more. And a sport watch at that price point should be 100m water resistance. When I go on vacation I often will not take off my watch since hotel safes aren’t great and it’s a pain to use the front desk safe repetitively. So I’d at least like to be able to snorkel or swim in the ocean in my watch.

    • @tomhaynes99
      @tomhaynes99 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can get away with shallow scuba diving to around 18 metres with 100m too as long as it’s from a reputable brand

    • @Peter-tc3ep
      @Peter-tc3ep ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tomhaynes99 it’s not recommended, only swimming, snorkeling, nothing deeper then 10 feet. 200m would be for a resort or not too deep of a dive. 300m for standard diving.

    • @mochi6900
      @mochi6900 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I’ve dived with my Daytona several times to more than 35 meters and it still works like a charm, I’ve had it for 5+ years
      PS: I don’t invite you to do the same, I’m just giving you my personal experience

    • @Peter-tc3ep
      @Peter-tc3ep 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mochi6900 Rolex’s are 100m waterproof not 50m water resistant that’s completely different rating.

  • @jsc6288
    @jsc6288 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ok seems alot of people dont understands how it works whilst it might say "water resistant to 50m" the way they test it is with pressure effectively false advertising so no i wouldnt even feel sale washing my hands with a 50m watch because water can get in very easily

  • @Tys583
    @Tys583 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ye the amount of royal aoks iv gone through because im always at 55m is ridiculous

  • @carltonneckbrace4039
    @carltonneckbrace4039 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How often you 50m below the water? I never have been and never intend to be

  • @udosmesovsky4249
    @udosmesovsky4249 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    10 years ago, nobody gave attention to these watches. It is a social media phaenomenon!

    • @Saysoju
      @Saysoju 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Oh but people did, but it was known between the rich. AP has been around since the 1800s

    • @udosmesovsky4249
      @udosmesovsky4249 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Saysoju oh, really 😮 didn't know that ... 😂

    • @titorocha5771
      @titorocha5771 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Saysojuprices have skyrocketed because of social media

  • @itsnowjoke1381
    @itsnowjoke1381 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    You would have to be mad to swim in a royal oak

    • @josteinholen1312
      @josteinholen1312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would rather say poor.

  • @TomasEriksson001
    @TomasEriksson001 ปีที่แล้ว

    My AD by accident pressure tested my 15400st for 10bar/100m, passed perfectly. Wore it in the ocean, saunas, hot tubs since I got it in 2015, no issues.

    • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
      @The_real_Mr_Ghost 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bs it would never hold. AP would never test it more than 5bar

  • @udosmesovsky4249
    @udosmesovsky4249 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For AP its too costly to change the WR to 100m. They gonna sell them anyhow. Same with finde adjustment clasp. Those things lower the margin!

  • @andreabadino4873
    @andreabadino4873 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Diver's favorite watch

  • @jhandal311
    @jhandal311 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Isnt that what the off shore is for ?

    • @Bestow3000
      @Bestow3000 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but the off shore design is ugly tbh

  • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
    @The_real_Mr_Ghost 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    and no Extension link and they brake all the time...........

  • @Ryuu92i
    @Ryuu92i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    100m should be a minimum for people who wear it for vacation for exemple
    Especially in a hotel where leaving your 5/6 figures watch can be risky, you would like to take a quick swim with it. Wether at the beach or at the pool.
    50m can be enough but it’s risky as I saw many people ruining their watch this way.
    100m is fine, but I would be a bit psycho about it if I do swim in the ocean
    200m is great and can do anything that normal people would do, including water sports.
    Too bad the speedmaster is only 50, and most of the rolex catalogue that I like are only 100
    Tudor does well with their watches being on average 200m wr, if we don’t mind the chunkiness of them

  • @ВоваАндрухов
    @ВоваАндрухов 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Guys what are budget options(200-1000$) of watches with the same form/shape ? Or how its called ( that hectogon/ 8 sides type)? Will be really greatfull

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Just buy a good replica of this for $500.

  • @MrBigblue7
    @MrBigblue7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The other issue with the Royal Oak is that it scratches really easily.

  • @jobkuperus
    @jobkuperus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a Naui / GUE Tech 2 diver I can 400% assure you that at +50mtr / +170ft dives (which are multi tank / multi gas decompression dives) you do not even WANT this on your wrist.

    • @questionyourself718
      @questionyourself718 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wouldnt be resistant anyway 😄 its not 50m deepness resistant. Its just resistant against the pressure at 50m but tested in a laboratory. In real life with water around it and movement the water still comes in. 50meter wr means its okay to wear it in light rain or get a couple drops on it when cleaning dishes etc. A shower is already to much.

  • @kwsteve1
    @kwsteve1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And we need a half link or small clasp adjustment

  • @VERYMADMIKE
    @VERYMADMIKE หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you want a Diver Watch that also looks like a dresswatch, then I would go with an Omega Seamaster 300M. Used by Cousteau and Bond 007. 😎

  • @elicytrynbaum2969
    @elicytrynbaum2969 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AP pls fix, thx.

  • @junito1008
    @junito1008 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Tell me time that you've been under water below 10 feet...so you will never be below 50meters be quiet and wear the damn watch.

  • @roderick9018
    @roderick9018 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    50m water rating means safe for splashes from washing hands, you can't swim in a pool with that rating. 100m rating is minimum for swimming for pressure. They are rated at static water setting. 200m and up are good for diving / water sports like water sking.

  • @houlester
    @houlester ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ll have to stick with my Patek Tiffany for those 300ft dives I guess

  • @derekstiles5801
    @derekstiles5801 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    You know good and damn well you ain’t fixing to dive with that watch.
    😂

  • @ats-3693
    @ats-3693 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Meanwhile I have a Planet Ocean 600m and don't even wear it swimming 😏 not because I'm worried water will get inside I know that won't happen, I just worry that I'll catch it on something while messing around in the water and it will somehow come off my wrist without me realising 😳

  • @Ian-ij4of
    @Ian-ij4of ปีที่แล้ว

    Maurice lacroix Aikon has 200m water resistance with a screw down crown...😊

  • @JD-ml7cg
    @JD-ml7cg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They put 50meters on there because it's actually indestructible. They never thought others would go higher.

  • @duhvakiin3467
    @duhvakiin3467 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ironic when you realize that the designer of the watch, Gerald Genta, actually drew inspiration from vintage diving helmets when designing the Royal Oak lol

  • @jimbaranresidence8
    @jimbaranresidence8 ปีที่แล้ว

    If u opt for 3126 ROO enhancement, AP will reduce 59jewel to 54jewel, the watch gets lighter, the min hand jump everytime u adjust the time. A watch not for the nex generation

  • @Sovnarkom
    @Sovnarkom ปีที่แล้ว +1

    50m because you probably should take it into the shower when washing up after sharing your suite with a native.

  • @Happy-mh8xq
    @Happy-mh8xq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s rated to that doesn’t mean it actually would work under water and I can’t see anyone wearing anything expensive to go underwater it’s just silly 😂

  • @KyleDeVilliers
    @KyleDeVilliers 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    People who obsess over WR numbers never even spend any time underwater

  • @Gii1234
    @Gii1234 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When it comes to watches 50m means it’s only appropriate to wash your hands in it, you cannot take a 50m watch swimming at all. This is a huge huge problem with this watch. 100m is minimum for a swim.

  • @AfnanStudio_
    @AfnanStudio_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guess everybody that bought this AP will take their suit and dive more than 50m

  • @LB-fi3xd
    @LB-fi3xd ปีที่แล้ว

    I love my life but the problem is I only make $94M usd a year my friends are making billions every month.

  • @ismevictor7289
    @ismevictor7289 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how often are you going 160 feet underwater with ur ap bro?

  • @ludwiggraupe1619
    @ludwiggraupe1619 ปีที่แล้ว

    How often did you dive 100m with a AP? Have you even a Watch?

  • @omar1818
    @omar1818 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Patek Nautilus is now 30m.
    Fixed

  • @Tiberiusvonfunk
    @Tiberiusvonfunk 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unless you dive commercially you will never wear a watch at 50m never mind 150. And even if you did I think you’d leave your AP on dry land

  • @oak6302
    @oak6302 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t get why it has a date, thats the only downside for me

  • @a-smash8927
    @a-smash8927 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wear a different watch when you go diving?

  • @micaljimenez7381
    @micaljimenez7381 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    in fact you will never go to 100 meter with your royal oak,only if you are pasanger of the titanic😅,but your right,its a little detail,an other detail more important for me is the seconds whovare not present,that make the watch more boring and without animation,just my point of view,if you send me the royal oak i accept it😅

  • @bekhamuminov
    @bekhamuminov 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have u ever been in depth more that 2metre?

  • @_angl_
    @_angl_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone who actually dives isn't doing it with a high horology watch. MAYBE a Rolex.

  • @nikkimiddlekillsday5161
    @nikkimiddlekillsday5161 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah AP doesn't give good water resistance

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    WHAT THE FUCK I THOUGHT THE WHOLE POINT WAS IT WAS WATERPROOF
    IT LITERALLY HAS BOLTS HOLDING THE DAMN CASE TOGETHER

  • @pnash225
    @pnash225 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Biggest issue with the Royal Oak is the lack of micro adjustment in the bracelet.

  • @edgarmartins1811
    @edgarmartins1811 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's the only reason I don't buy one....

  • @josteinholen1312
    @josteinholen1312 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I did not know this. Seeing that this is a watch that I aspire to own, I am disappointed.

  • @TheHoth1
    @TheHoth1 ปีที่แล้ว

    No quick set date neither.

  • @BozgorSlayer
    @BozgorSlayer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Even Seiko "Royal Oak" mods are 100M...

    • @LongHa-wb7bn
      @LongHa-wb7bn หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where bro can you give me link tks 😊

  • @timtim2949
    @timtim2949 ปีที่แล้ว

    A G-Shock G-Metal GM-B2100D-1AER has 200m water resistance, just saying.

  • @WouterZtube
    @WouterZtube ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t like a lot about that watch:
    - The logo on the dial
    - The AP logo on the clasp
    - All the angles and sharp edges. The Nautilus looks way better.
    - The dial
    - The hype
    - The price

  • @4lifefc
    @4lifefc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always chuckle looking at my submariner in the deep end of the pool thinking this 15 feet is the deepest it’s going to go… ever

    • @jimmylight4866
      @jimmylight4866 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@4lifefc You never know. You may wind up on a cruise over the Marianas Trench and get drunk and fall overboard. I suggest you get a Sea Dweller.

  • @koby-h
    @koby-h ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In what situation are you swimming 164 ft underwater with a luxery watch seriously i dont even think james bind would find himself in that situation

  • @wildcat_reloading
    @wildcat_reloading ปีที่แล้ว

    Agreed as i speed alot of time at 100m below the water

  • @irwankrisnawan905
    @irwankrisnawan905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simple buy an offshore version

  • @ВикторРашков-з6с
    @ВикторРашков-з6с 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Casio Edifice 100m wr , chronograph, date, sapphire crystal,all stainless steel and is lookalike to Ap for 1 % of the price XD

  • @makmat400
    @makmat400 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    For guys who doesn't give a f about watches:
    30m of WR for light rain
    50m of WR is for Heavy rain
    100m of WR you can barely swim
    200+ can be divers watch

    • @CrabbinFever
      @CrabbinFever 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Try and provide accurate information if you're going to attempt to teach beginners. Thanks

    • @makmat400
      @makmat400 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@CrabbinFever what's wrong?

    • @CrabbinFever
      @CrabbinFever 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@makmat400 Other than your attitude when taking criticism, nothing is wrong. Thanks.

    • @virusthree
      @virusthree 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@CrabbinFever ?? lmao what

    • @davidlanglois6055
      @davidlanglois6055 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@CrabbinFever Go get a hug you need it

  • @louzer4609
    @louzer4609 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was just swimming with my AP when i realized it was a 50000 dollar watch AND YOU DONT SWIM WITH A WATCH THAT IS LITERALLY AS EXPENSIVE AS A BRAND NEW CAR!!!
    (Also I dont actually have an AP)

  • @sahilthebighill236
    @sahilthebighill236 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I love how you act like your actually gonna take your royal oak down to 150m of water but in reality the most water its gonna see is when your washing your hand

    • @feynex31
      @feynex31 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Static pressure is not the same as dynamic pressure.

    • @feynex31
      @feynex31 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      100m is for casual swimming

    • @sahilthebighill236
      @sahilthebighill236 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@feynex31 I swim with my Casio a500 that's rated for 30m all the time and it's perfectly fine🤷‍♂️

  • @riddles4237
    @riddles4237 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ummm 😐 I’m guessing he’s the ONLY person in the WORLD who’s asking for an AP to be more sustainable to water 🙄

  • @vangledosh
    @vangledosh 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    AP should just rebrand as the royal oak brand. They don’t make any other watches, their entire success is based off this and nothin else

  • @yusufbest4475
    @yusufbest4475 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about anti magnetism?

    • @classicmac8986
      @classicmac8986 ปีที่แล้ว

      none, this watch is worthless.

  • @Jaykilla1981
    @Jaykilla1981 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wouldn't be going deeper than like 5 meters.

  • @thefreshprinceofbelleairbeach
    @thefreshprinceofbelleairbeach ปีที่แล้ว

    The nautilus has 120m WR

  • @liox_1993
    @liox_1993 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    my little 8k rolex having 300 meters 🤭

  • @sameer07ism
    @sameer07ism ปีที่แล้ว

    Best watch giveaway please

  • @goldmachine1535
    @goldmachine1535 ปีที่แล้ว

    When my problems become like this I'll be happy

  • @ProfessorCarlo
    @ProfessorCarlo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let me ask you a question, forget diving, do you even swim? 😊

  • @SirBillyDorseyJr
    @SirBillyDorseyJr หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not putting my $84k watch in ONE feet of water, much less 150. 🤦🏾‍♂️

  • @TheOmbudsman_
    @TheOmbudsman_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah think this is something to do with the offshore being their dive watch 🤦‍♀️

  • @KaushikBala333
    @KaushikBala333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I first want to see the wearer go 5 meters under water so that they get a fair idea. And then stop worrying about it

  • @americanpaisareturns9051
    @americanpaisareturns9051 ปีที่แล้ว

    To me it’s hideous looking status symbol but to others it a beautiful peace of fine art. To each their own. Good for you.

  • @verynormalman
    @verynormalman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you're going to pretend to be a big shot, then get the watches actually sized to your wrist. It looks really sad!

  • @SimonSayad
    @SimonSayad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nobody goes swimming deeper than 10 feet on a regular basis with or without a watch let alone and expensive AP!

  • @brianpatrik
    @brianpatrik 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    50m is several feet beyond the recreational dive limit

  • @Yesman10
    @Yesman10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s going nowhere near the water when I get one

  • @cole4987
    @cole4987 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if it was only 1 meter I still wouldn't care. I'm not going anywhere near water with a watch on.

  • @Arylist
    @Arylist ปีที่แล้ว

    "Theres only 50 meters" whens the last time you swam? Not even talking about swimming with the watch

  • @mahefarafidison7388
    @mahefarafidison7388 ปีที่แล้ว

    A person who can afford a AP can easily get another dive watch ...why are they going to wear AP so deep?

  • @Saccara
    @Saccara ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah of course…since you go diving regularly at weekends in the Mariana Trench! 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @micklo106
    @micklo106 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can’t swim so the pool is just fine to floss.😂

  • @PsychedelicMind67
    @PsychedelicMind67 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because you're often diving below 50 meters aren't you?

  • @MarcelVDSpuy
    @MarcelVDSpuy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's not a diving watch though

  • @thunderpants007
    @thunderpants007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cheap sport watches have 200 plus. Style over function?

  • @zevlerner6167
    @zevlerner6167 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    as long as i can wash my hands i think i’m all set 😭

    • @The_real_Mr_Ghost
      @The_real_Mr_Ghost 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes you can as long as the watch is not under water....otherwise u are fiked

  • @jayc4715
    @jayc4715 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ap look like the old quartz to Rolex

  • @NYCQ50
    @NYCQ50 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damm that vc looks better than both

  • @muratkaraaslan7432
    @muratkaraaslan7432 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's water RESISTANT, not water PROOF.

  • @Jayjewelerofficial
    @Jayjewelerofficial ปีที่แล้ว

    My g shock haves 200m water resistance 😊

  • @watchingu83
    @watchingu83 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let’s be real, no one is going deeper than 50 meters with an AP RO on their wrist

  • @zoltanember6353
    @zoltanember6353 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wouldn't even wear a watch in a swimming pool, let alone when diving at sea.

  • @lrgpapi
    @lrgpapi ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are these water resistant anyways? Who's taking an 80k watch into any watery situation??

    • @tryxxor
      @tryxxor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you never wash your hands? My Fitbit is water resistant so i can do things like, the dishes,wash my hands and walk through rain but no sane diver would take that on a dive.
      I like my stuff not breaking when it gets wet or submerged for a while, heck even phones have ip68 ratings now and i know many poeple who take their 1500€ iphone into the pool with them.