WARSHIPS | The forgotten titans of BattleTech

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 421

  • @literatesasquatch
    @literatesasquatch 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    I remember the in-universe explanation for the solar sails was not about having enough extra power to charge them but that the FTL Drive was so sensitive you were required to charge it slowly. Trying to use the main reactor to charge it might give you an electrical burp or hiccup that could damage your FTL Drive. Solar panels were slow enough they guaranteed it was safe to charge.

    • @Jebbis
      @Jebbis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That is what it says in the first edition Dropships and Jumpship.

    • @ShasIsMushroom
      @ShasIsMushroom 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So nobody ever heard about a capacitor in this world?

    • @Rhiawhyn
      @Rhiawhyn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@ShasIsMushroom It's not just power flow or charge smoothing. No capacitor can smooth out the utterly obscene power fluctuations of the fusion cores in BT, as they are some of the most high power reactor systems in sci-fi out there. These fluctuations aren't minor, they are big enough that they'd black out entire cities with a surge or a brownout. Not only is it generally unstable, the reactor fluctuates constantly, not 'might', so it's always practically vibrating around with it's power output.
      Caps can help if the power is MOSTLY stable, but it isn't with a fusion core. It's constantly going from +100 to -30 to +180 to -6 then +800 then -1,400. The solar sails have a fixed output relative to the distance which makes it actually possible to use capacitors to smooth out the power flow so it's just a gentle, but low grade +5. They have a realistic actual output of solar panel value so they aren't exactly good or really that strong at generating power so it can take a long time. And yes, they do store the power in the FTL core itself, yes it has capacitors technically. No you can't really use a series of external batteries to give it the ability to jump multiple times as it can't even accept power that fast in the first place anyway. This is why that one particular thing most warships had, which was a second jump charge battery, was so valuable.
      That system managed to pull off what nobody actually could do with how the FTL drives worked, and let the FTL drive store enough power for two jumps, with only a brief period of time between them. Two whole jumps... which was extremely good if you needed to GTFO fast from a bad situation. But it also meant you had to charge twice as long, which would leave you pretty vulnerable later on.

    • @FlowNeffets
      @FlowNeffets หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree, that's what I remember, as well. There was the possibility to add an additional huge battery that could store an additional charge for a second jump that could be charged by a space station, as well. Just that these space stations, being stationary, become one of the first things to be blasted into oblivion during the succession wars.

  • @bubbasbigblast8563
    @bubbasbigblast8563 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    One of the reasons I love Battletech is because there's a legit reason something as odd as mechs became the main war machine: they're basically a gentleman's agreement style of war, since it gave the nobility prestige, and nuking every planet into oblivion with ships nobody could actually afford created more problems then were ever solved.

    • @Quincy_Morris
      @Quincy_Morris หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s not a legit reason. Thats a dumb reason that ignores that there is only one rule in war: victory.
      I always assumed mechs took off because vertically stacked guns were more efficient than horizontally stacked guns. Basically every mech comes with its own built in height advantage and can wield far more firepower than a horizontal framed vehicle like a tank could. Though tanks of course are heavily present.

  • @Sigil_Firebrand
    @Sigil_Firebrand 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +201

    As one of the few people to actually have a battletech warship fleet, this video brings me joy!

    • @drmayeda1930
      @drmayeda1930 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You forgot the jump sails needed to recharge the FTL drives.

    • @Xingmey
      @Xingmey 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@drmayeda1930
      can it really be called FTL if it is a jump drive?
      not calling you wrong, just being curious

    • @Rexereman
      @Rexereman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Xingmey jump drives get you to a location faster than light can, so it's technically ftl?

    • @skitzseattle
      @skitzseattle 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      space folding and tearing, not motion by speed. KF drive@@Rexereman

    • @oriffel
      @oriffel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello brother. I am finally not alone!

  • @patrickcoyle5469
    @patrickcoyle5469 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    BT's deep-space combat is the source of the most hilarious rules adaptation I've ever seen.
    In a chapter of either Strategic or Interstellar Operations, there are a few pages discussing "high-speed engagements," situations in which opposing fleets won't be able to meet up for a conventional fight, so they just gun their thrusters for a few days and fly through each other. After getting a sensor track on opposing targets, each fleet determines relative velocities, angles of attack, and unit orientation, then fire a single massive volley during the fraction of a second they're in effective targeting range. It usually ends with everybody either shredded to pieces or spiraling out of control into the void, needing several more days to get themselves back on course to anywhere.
    At the end, there's an addendum for players who want a more realistic ruleset for fleets flying through each other at "significant fractions of lightspeed." The book suggests each player take their fleet's record sheet and feed them simultaneously into paper shredders. Whoever's sheet comes out last is the winner.

  • @SirThoreth
    @SirThoreth 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    As an official member of the Battletech Aerospace Cabal (and with a WarShip design of mine officially published) thank you for revisiting Battletech's WarShips. I still remember the arguments on the official boards at how the WarShip rules were being shuffled off to Strategic Operations, when they decided to split Tactical Operations into two books. In the end, I think the thing that did them in the most in the post-Clan era, and was key to the writers nearly wiping them back out again in the Jihad, is how WarShips attacking 'Mech transports could upset the setting's focus on the BattleMech.

    • @spartanalex9006
      @spartanalex9006 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      To which I call the Devs cowards.
      Question though, what ship is your’s?

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I do understand that argument, because it's true... unless _everyone_ has warships. They were doing just fine until deciding to have the WOB destroy 99% of IS and Clan Warships, that is what really upset the balance. Battletech is hard sci-fi, that's one of the reasons I love it, and true to real life naval assets are absolutely essential for any kind of far reaching campaign. The Pacific War being a great example. When humanity does eventually get out into space, and if we ever do figure out interstellar travel, a black-water navy is going to be the star of any war. No ships means no secure troop transportation, and no war. All you could do then is shake your little fists at the sky and hurl insults towards whatever planet happens to be your enemy. It's only logical that we'd try slapping a bunch of weapons on them at some point, then everyone else would do it to keep up...

    • @lolroflroflcakes
      @lolroflroflcakes 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean in the same vein it's nothing like a navy because a ship on the ocean can hide beyond the horizon or under the water and once it leaves port unless you are physically tailing them the whole way they could alter course and surprise you anywhere.
      In space you'll be able to see a ship as soon as it launches and they will only ever really be going to one place. It would be trivial to plot an intercept and since you have shorter supply lines and no need to move you can just keep taking potshots forcing them to burn fuel and ammunition till they leave or die.
      Fixed defences will be basically insurmountable without ludicrously unsustainable casualties.

    • @vederianl9723
      @vederianl9723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lolroflroflcakes Fixed defences can't dodge. You fire at an invader from your planet, they change course and target your launchers. After your launchers are dead then they turn back towards the planet.

    • @Rhiawhyn
      @Rhiawhyn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lolroflroflcakes Fixed defenses have a fixed firing pattern and firing location, along with having a fixed position and fixed.... you get the point. Any range you can fire from the ground can be matched from something in orbit in BT. You forget that these aren't 20 meter long boats with 3 people on them. These are flying cities with guns as big as your defensive planetary batteries on them. If you can reach them, they can reach you. "but but I can detect them from..." That doesn't matter. You can't hit them from those distances no matter how good you say your guns are. A deviation of 0.0000005% over 100km is utterly titanic in orbital scales, despite it being a perfect laser pointer of accuracy if applied to a rifle. By the time you can actually threaten a warship from the ground, they can threaten you and bomb you right back. "But I have missiles!" So do they. "But my missiles can..." So can they.
      These are FTL capable ships which can in fact, in multiple instances, jump straight into orbit of your planet. If they don't, they jump into the poles of your local star or a major gravity well. From there these things burn at 1g or more at you and can easily burn over a g of thrust in literally any direction. Even if you had this magical perfect silver bullet fired from a gun that's got a deviation of literally 0, they can see you firing it just as easily as you can see them and can just lightly tap the thrusters to make it miss while maintaining full speed at you. They do not need to do any fancy movements to avoid it, just tap a random thruster direction at that distance and you miss.
      There was a very, very good reason why warships were the undisputed kings of battletech in their time. You either had a warship fleet, or you were a vassal of someone who did. Oh and, as a note that I forgot entirely. By the time you "see a ship being launched" it'd be about 20 to 30 years after they've already arrived. These are faster than light capable warships. The only warning you are going to get is them appearing in orbit, no "we can see them on FTL sensors coming!" or them appearing in orbit of the star. There is nothing that can detect them as even if you had a scanner capable of picking something up traveling at FTL speeds... they aren't traveling. They are teleporting. The jump in BT isn't "fly for X weeks/months to arrive", it's literally seconds. You start the jump, you wait for a minute at most, you arrive. Even if you did see them launching, they'd be there before you get a chance to finish telling your CO that a ship just went to hyperspace.

  • @lukasz88888888
    @lukasz88888888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    I remember once we tried to use aerotech. The air support was great, it caused the enemy Rifleman to roll from his fortified position on top of the hill for 4 turns and fall into the river. And then it exploded.

    • @darkhobo
      @darkhobo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah they're pretty nice in Roguetech. But not the place to put your experienced pilots... I'll put it that way. Don't use any expensive components...

  • @michaellewis1545
    @michaellewis1545 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    The combine arm aspects of Battletech is one of my favorite aspects of the setting.
    It just make the universe feel more real.

    • @bthsr7113
      @bthsr7113 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      About the only other mech centric setting that came close to trying as hard at combined arms was early Gundam. But Gundam has very much moved on from that while even recent-ish Battletech games keep the fear of vehicles working with mechs alive.

    • @bogdanv1353
      @bogdanv1353 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@bthsr7113 SRM Carrier will make most mech pilot shit brick

    • @bthsr7113
      @bthsr7113 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@bogdanv1353 Oh I know. And I think I heard there's a Clan version with hardened armor. Because it wasn't scary enough. Apparently.

    • @denniskrenz2080
      @denniskrenz2080 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bogdanv1353 Depends on the experience. If you know them, you know that they will usually die before they run out of ammo. But of course, each salvo can ruin a perfectly fine mech and cause physical injury to the owning player of the SRM carrier while rolling hit locations for each missile. In a city they are a great denial weapon. But if you meet one in an open field, the SRM carrier is almost harmless and it can only hope that other units catch the LRMs for it.

    • @darkhobo
      @darkhobo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bogdanv1353weird way to spell Demolisher

  • @jakeg3733
    @jakeg3733 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    Battlespace is so underrated. It's actually one of my favorite aspects of BT. Hyper-realistic depiction of space combat even back in the 90s when everything was usually just handwaved away by whatever franchise. As an example, one of the novels makes a point of showing that lasers don't shoot visible beams in space. DEW fire would only be detectable from sensors, or when you get hit. Newtonian physics, massive engagement ranges, decompression that actually kills, Battlespace took the plausible route long before Battlestar Galactica made it cool
    The engagements depicted in the novels _The Hunters_ and _Betrayal of Ideals_ were excellent. It was like something from The Expanse, except with massive warships with more advanced tech
    I really hope we get an update to Battlespace someday. Space warfare is cool again to the masses, and I think it'd be a pretty successful venture if they decided to update the TT, the ship aesthetics, and perhaps developed a computer game or some other media

    • @SpielkindFR
      @SpielkindFR 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Did you just call space battles in battlestar galactica plausible? 🤨

    • @norrismacon
      @norrismacon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I remember a sequence in one of the civil war novels, I forget which, but a jumpship captain has to command a warship during a battle and it's awesome. The Werewolf was the ship, I remember that much.

    • @steakthedoggaming5333
      @steakthedoggaming5333 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      So, CGL, the company currently selling BattleTech property paraphernalia, has been trying to make a modernized AreoTech ruleset, however, they have apparently been having trouble making a good ruleset.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@steakthedoggaming5333 Awesome. I don't envy them, part of the magic was the ridiculous complexity. They'll have to slim that down enough to appeal to mainstream audiences, while at the same time keeping some of it to stay true to BT. Hope they can figure it out

    • @OldManSparkplug
      @OldManSparkplug 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Naval. Auto. Cannon.

  • @bluedotdinosaur
    @bluedotdinosaur 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    One thing to keep in mind as far as in-universe history goes, is that the classical age of epic space warfare pre-dates the Star League. As Battletech tells it, everybody quickly finds out how horrific advanced space war is, in multiple ways. Before there were FTL communications, everybody in the inner sphere got up to all sorts of nasty surprise attacks to try and end new wars before they even began. This involved lots and lots of space combat as fleets of ships could jump into systems before the local forces could ever hear that a conflict had begun.
    This period of warfare was built around overwhelming lighting strikes which, with FTL travel but not comms, WAS extremely effective - but also incredibly wasteful. Jumpships and Warships were big and powerful but also complicated and super expensive. In time, money, and materials. As war spiraled out of control, everybody quickly became horrified at how much they were suffering in losses.
    By the era of the Battlemech and the Star League, the general convention had become to voluntarily restrict combat to certain doctrines, such as Jumpships being extremely off-limits targets except for boarding actions to take control of the ship without significant damage. And even that was considered distasteful and even a bit barbaric - interdict and arrest the enemy Jumpship yes, but don't touch it. So space combat in general became somewhat de-escalated. Except for heavy fighter and defense platform action in planetary orbits to keep dropships at bay.
    The last great space battle, canonically, was in the Star League era during the last stages of the Amaris civil war. Star League had fortified the Terran system with possibly the only remaining vast scale space fleet, so numerous it was capable of patrolling much of the system simultaneously. Many of the ships were automated to make this possible, but still counted as Warships. The final push into occupied Sol System by Kerensky's forces was one grotesque space battle with the goal being to obliterate the defending ships even if it meant all the attackers were lost. And it pretty much came to that.
    One might imagine that even aside from the consequences of Lostech, this last great battle was an ugly reminder of how wasteful all-out space war was.

    • @gregdomenico1891
      @gregdomenico1891 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Wholesale fleet engagement and Planetary bombardment were common until the Ares 'Suggestions' were implemented. There was a break for awhile, then when the Reunification War started, it was back to business as usual. The Battle for the Sol system was the largest (The SLDF deployed over a 1000 warships) but that was because of the Reagan Defense system guarding the system. Loses were horrendous.
      During the First Succession War, the IS still had about a 1000 warships left; the last great battles happened then. In the 'modern' era, the FWL had the biggest fleet, right up to the WOB Jihad. After that, pretty much the Raven Alliance has the most.
      The prohibition on attacking Jumpships didn't start until 3/4 of the way thru the 1st Succession War, when due to losses, no body could move troops anymore. And believe it or not, it was Davion and Kurita that started it.

    • @namechamps
      @namechamps 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Clans had some 260 warships survive the exodus and then build another 300 or so more. So they exist but their rarity means they are used as more of an armored jump ship than how they were used originally. The warship ensured an invasion of a system couldn't be displaced or cutoff but most of the fighting was done by the more numerous and not priceless dropships. Lose a dozen dropships and that is a bad day. Lose a warship and that is a (nearly) irreplaceable loss.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well said. The battle of Tentativa was my favorite because it highlights the kind of issues you'd have in this scenario i.e. FTL travel but no FTL comms. Plus, the TDF was just badass in this time period. In fact, the entire Reunification War is excellent lore
      Briefly, the TDF knew the SL and Federated Suns were going to making a big push into their territory. They decided to hit first while a FedSuns fleet was charging their drives in a nearby system and make them look stupid. Although they were hopelessly outclassed, it worked very, very well. They ultimately lost the war, but damn did they make the IS powers pay for every -inch- light year. If you're into this stuff and you haven't read Historical: Reunification War, I'd highly recommend picking it up. Some of the best high-level space combat I've seen in sci-fi

    • @gregdomenico1891
      @gregdomenico1891 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @jakeg3733 Sven van Der plank has a really good series on the Reunification War. He goes pretty in-depth on the Naval battles. And yeah, the TDF put up one hell of a fight; SL planners had it taking 5 years; took them 20.

  • @grygaming5519
    @grygaming5519 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    That wasnt the main limiting factor though. The biggest factor was the K-F compact drive these warships had. The drive themselves was the primary reason why Warships went extinct because without the technology to compact the K-F drive, you were limited to just your Jumpship moving things.
    The Draconis Combine effectively turned Drop ships into warships calling them Pocket Warships that were just transportable frigates into a battle space littered with guns and in some of them fighters. They weren't true warships because the lack of the drive but they helped in any Naval Defense and any Engagement. Every great house afterwards manufactured their own version of the pocket warship.
    The other aspect was just...transporting a K-F Drive itself, there were specialized jump ships that would do the job or complicated processes to move a core it was highly expensive. In most navies when a ship was decommissioned its core was moved from the old to the newer warship. Transporting a Titanium-Germanium core took time and there were only several processing facilities in the whole quadrant of the inner sphere that could produce whole drives, while there were multiple facilities that could reconstitute the said materials stored in specialized tanks (as to not interfere with the K-F drive it was being transported on).
    Oddly these were the primary targets along with the mobile systems that would repair and refit these ships themselves. Most of the noble houses had several if not more Germanium-rich systems in their possession. As always the issue was holding and then refining the material itself. ComStar in all its fuckery made sure the technology to create, transport, reverse engineer and manufacture new K-F drives was in their possession alone. This is why any SLDS that was found or a missing Great House Ship that was able to be recovered often landed with the 1st Circuits private military swooping in and slagging the ship.

    • @logion567
      @logion567 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Actually it wasn't the manufacturing of the Compact KF Cores used by warships that were the issue, on a technological level they're easier to make than the Standard Cores used by Jumpships (just more expensive, think steel manufacturing using Luddle Furnaces vs. The Bessemer Process or something)
      The real bottleneck was the massive honking Fusion Drives they use to Transit from the Jump Point to the ecliptic plane. And the great houses could've begun building Warships sooner, but no one wanted to start an Arms Race they may wind up losing. The Clans showing up changed that however.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@logion567 Yep, plans had been on the table for some time but it was prohibitively expensive and difficult to justify. Plus, as you said, the risk of starting Armageddon all over again repeating the 1st succession war
      The drives were a big issue but I feel like crewing them would've been even more problematic, plus some of the naval weapons systems were well beyond the capabilities of IS nations to produce until the 3040s. And it's not like you can just transfer DropShip crews and expect they'd know how to operate a warship. These things are MASSIVE

  • @dshafterh3897
    @dshafterh3897 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Ok, very vintage viewer here and you just unlocked a memory from when I was in the USAF we played alot of games because the internet didn't exist and I remember playing this. It was a pain and the people that were playing were in the Air Force so we understood velocity and azimuth angles and it was almost like still being on duty so we went back to fighting big robots and Rogue Trader. I congratulate you on even knowing this existed but if you want niche I remember playing a Ral Partha Battlestar Galactica game the used the hex grid and was Cylons versus Vipers in space if you're looking for something really obscure.

    • @b.s.864
      @b.s.864 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Pretty sure that the hex based Battlestar Galactica game was also by Fasa.
      Stock#6001 Battlestar Galactica A Game of Starfighter Combat

    • @JSRLPadre
      @JSRLPadre 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      FASA also did some fun Star Trek tactical games that laid the groundwork for the excellent Star Trek Starfleet Command PC game series.

  • @supsup335
    @supsup335 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Don't know if you just decided not to mention it due to time or didn't find out about it, but there are several facts I really love about Battletech ships and I think should get more credit (aside from radiator fins and sails):
    - The Solar sails (yes, I start with them) with solar panels are not only used to recharge the KF drive but also used to decelerate the ship when approaching the jump points above the stars poles, saving fuel and reducing heat. Also, the can charge the KF drive with reactors, BUT it damages the drive; called crash-charging or something. And it only cuts the recharge time only to a third or so.
    - Being built like ships in the expanse, having most decks aligned in a way to use thrust as the source of gravity (yes, old art depicted them like "scifi ships" but they retconed it)
    - Internal Command decks (again, old art shows outside bridges, but they were retconed into being observation decks and manouvering bridges for flying during normal operations)
    - Larger warships featuring rotation drums called the grav decks that let the crew live under gravity during the large transit times during which the drives are turned off.
    - Once they reach a planet they flip to break their velocity.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Yeah they went with realism back before it was cool, and I love it. We need an update because I think it would succeed this time if the rules were streamlined a bit, without totally eviscerating them (which would take the uniqueness away)

    • @BelRigh
      @BelRigh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jakeg3733(r)amen.
      .. I did a gurps space campaign years ago... One faction was at that sort of level....

    • @TheTrueAdept
      @TheTrueAdept 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jakeg3733 there is the fact that Alpha Strike cards for Warships exist... so there are likely alpha-strike rules for space combat.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheTrueAdeptAlpha-strikes make no sense in space combat, or any combat in a vacuum. Except as a last resort, or if you have overwhelming advantage. It's just too much waste heat. I guess you could coolant dump and keep firing, but then you're going to run out of coolant

    • @TheTrueAdept
      @TheTrueAdept 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jakeg3733 Alpha Strike in this case denotes a ruleset that is vastly simplified for gameplay reasons.
      For example, instead of keeping track of how many hexes a weapon has, you only need to keep an eye on where its range bracket lies. Ammo isn't a concern unless you're working with vehicles/mechs without CASE, and there isn't that much math involved (a lot of it is simple addition).

  • @martinevans9757
    @martinevans9757 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As a fellow WarShip lover, I salute you. Oddly, BattleSpace is one of the ONLY space combat games to represent the huge problem of waste heat in space warships, making it super-realistic, which Battlemechs aren't. ;)

  • @dwrdwlsn5
    @dwrdwlsn5 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Talking about space warships-
    One game no one seems to remember is Renegade Legion, a FASA game that was supposed to be a Star Wars one, but was turned into something else when they didn't get the license. It was VERY much its own thing, but not fleshed out in many ways. I played it a few times in the 80s and liked it, but it fell by the wayside. I had a bunch of miniatures and all the boxed games until my last move when they vanished out of a box. :(( It had space combat with fighter class ships all the way up to battleships, ground combat with tanks and infantry, a mediocre role playing game and ALL of it could be integrated with other sets, making for combined arms coolness. It even had a ultra high tech chariot racing game.
    To put it into perspective, the mechs of Battletech go up to 100 tons mass normally. The tank I commonly used as a Renegade were Deliverer heavy grav tanks which massed 400 tons, could fly or be dropped straight from orbit. The Deliverer had a 200mm railgun as a main weapon that would blow a hole clean through a Zeus and keep right on going! Pity the franchise didn't go any further than a video game.
    I still remember a few of my epic space battles with friends where we fought to the bitter end for Glory, for Honor and to give the Terran Overlord Government a serious black eye!
    The tagline from the ground game stays wit me even now- 'You are the pinnacle of armored warfare. Your tank is hundreds of tons of modern materials bristling with the greatest firepower ever seen. Your life expectancy is less than ten minutes.'
    'nuff said.

    • @BlueLionNotOfPercy
      @BlueLionNotOfPercy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The fighter game was Renegade Legion Interceptor. The big naval game was Leviathan. Still have both on a shelf somewhere.

    • @miguelsan11
      @miguelsan11 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BlueLionNotOfPercy Same, I have Leviathan behind me on a shelf along with the Wake of the Kraken supplement.

    • @toddzircher6168
      @toddzircher6168 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You should check out FASA's Aetherstream Interceptor. It is a spiritual successor to Renegade Legion.

    • @thunberbolttwo3953
      @thunberbolttwo3953 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      There were renegade legion books.

    • @raghnallmacaodh3220
      @raghnallmacaodh3220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still have my copy.. great niche game...

  • @BlueLightning12
    @BlueLightning12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    You are correct sir. The design at approximately 21:50 is the McKenna class Battleship. The original Star League design. Not the Clan refit McKenna.

  • @steelhelix
    @steelhelix 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I remember playing BattleSpace back in the day. Honestly the coolest part that I think you didn't mention is actually a rules thing talking about the fact that damage actually scales between the versions of the FASA games. Manpad weapons do 1/10 the damage mech based stuff does and warships do another x10 damage; so a single shot from even the weakest capitol weapons blows through mechs as it's stronger than even AC/20s. It really puts everything into perspective when you realize a small laser can insta-kill a human but the same thing on a warship does it to a mech.

  • @dswanick
    @dswanick 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @1:23 "Now a lot of people know they exist..."
    This brought a tear to my eye and two words drifting through my memories ... Renegade Legion

  • @bthsr7113
    @bthsr7113 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If Battlemechs are the kings of war, these are the fallen Gods of Old.
    And for a brief time, they lived again.

  • @toddperez2548
    @toddperez2548 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I bought B-Tech when it was first released back in the 80s when it was called Battle Droids (Yup I'm old). Then Fasa changed the game to BattleTech. We played the WHOLE game once. B-Tech has/had a Stategic board game called Succession Wars. It was the whole Inner Sphere on a huge map. You could play the war from the first to the fourth war. I wasn't a great game, but the rules allowed you to combine all of the BattleTech games together. Play a house then go to war. First Play the Succession War then attack a world, then switch to Battlespace and or Aerospace. Then switch to Battle Force (a rare tactical squad base BattleTech board game). Then finally BattleTech/City Tech Battles. We did it once. Lasted 8 months and never did it again. Just stuck to BattleTech. And to this day my friends and I still play the old school BattleTech once a year because it's still an amazing game.

  • @Eulemunin
    @Eulemunin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I have run a campaign all the way from jump in to jump out. The tech manual made such a difference. It was so much fun.

  • @Reoh0z
    @Reoh0z 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I did in fact have all over those box sets, but no friends who were interested in it so I did solo campaigns covering all aspects of Battletech. Merc company of course.

  • @pouncerlion4022
    @pouncerlion4022 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think you did a great job, though one little mistake. The real reasons the Jumpships and Warships use solar sails are twofold.
    First, the jumpcore has to be kept supercold to function. Charging the core too quickly could cause thermal effects that damage the core and cause issues when jumping through hyperspace. The ship's main reactor has more than enough output to charge the core in far shorter times than the jumpsail can, but this causes thermal expansion on the core that can damage it.
    Secondly is efficiency, using the main powerplant to charge the jumpdrive can burn huge amounts of the ship's hydrogen fuel. Oversimplified, for every day you shorten your recharge time by you burn the same amount of hydrogen you would have if the ship had been under 1g of acceleration the whole time.

  • @shagrat47
    @shagrat47 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There is a nice storyline "Twilights of the Clans" in the Battletech novelization, where the Inner Sphere basically launches a counter attack on the clan homeworlds (a trial of extinction), against clan Smoke Jaguar. They use a fleet(!) of old SLDF Warships from ComStar "Task Force Serpent" and write some great depictions of actual ship to ship combat in space, inside the Battletech universe. 😎 Can really recommend the books.

  • @p.a_thomas661
    @p.a_thomas661 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Worldbuilding my own Sci-Fi Setting at the moment, the nitty-gritty logistical details of how a fleet was designed and works are honestly one of the most interesting parts. So, so much of it would influence every small engagment in space that it's mindboggeling.

  • @garland336
    @garland336 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have been running a 3+ year long battletech AU RPG; I got pretty heavy into the warship space for a few of the battles. I think it's remarkably cool and can be really amazing when put together with an emphasis on giving the players a sense of the sort of scale they're working in.

    • @garland336
      @garland336 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That said, I ended up making my own abridged ruleset, because wow, the math.

  • @KillerOrca
    @KillerOrca 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    The only thing that BT is missing from its space battles, in my opinion, is THE HOLY WALL OF FLAK

    • @wayrrior
      @wayrrior 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      No CIWS/flak cannons was the weirdest thing about BT's warships for me. How could they survive without just getting bombed to hell?

    • @martinjrgensen8234
      @martinjrgensen8234 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@wayrriorWell they didn’t. Once they started shooting at each other in earnest they died in droves.

    • @Tengen518
      @Tengen518 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@wayrriormutual destruction mostly. He who uses nukes would expect to be attacked with nukes. Of course that went entirely out the window during the Amaris civil war, the first succession, and second succession war.

    • @mattmelton7389
      @mattmelton7389 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's why you load em up with mech scale weapons. Fighter intercept and any of the naval scale missiles are targetable with AMS (also low damage)

    • @starfuryms582
      @starfuryms582 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      BLESSED BE IT'S NAME!

  • @chriscannon7065
    @chriscannon7065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One thing to mention about jump ships using the sails to charge over their other power systems, “hot loading” the jump drives in via other systems can be done in a few hours but also dramatically increase the chances of a misjump, possibly critically damaging the drives, or just out right loss of a vessel (destruction, jumping into a sun, jumping into open space and burning out the drives, etc.) It is generally considered that only a fool or someone extremely desperate would even risk hot loading.
    Edit - hopefully you will do a video covering the logistics of how jump technology works in battletech, including things like jump points, the differences between jumpships and warship, etc.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      K-F drives seem to require an extremely precise geometry down to the microscopic level to function. They're energy storage devices for massive amounts of energy, enough to rip a hole in spacetime. Hot charging probably disrupts the finely engineered structure at the nanoscale, like over-volting a microprocessor to an extreme degree.
      Hell, the cores have to be ground down to dust if the are going to be transported by another JumpShip or that too will cause a misjump

  • @TheGenericavatar
    @TheGenericavatar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Warships and jumpships can both charge their jump engines from their fusion engines.
    For warships, the solar sail was a back up.
    For civilian jumpships, solar sails are the primary charge method of charging the jump engines.
    The jump engines are progressively damaged at the molecular scale by being charged too fast. Which is why they usually are charged over the course of 2 weeks to prolong their lifespan. Jumping after only a day of charging by sail or by fusion engine meant a much higher chance of jump failure (death). Only a few hours of charging to capacity was for the truly desperate.

  • @StevenHouse1980
    @StevenHouse1980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It sounds like it needs a space combat BattleTech computer game, would basicly start with Stellaris and then add a few more levels of complexity on top of it. By changeing a few of combat rules could result in ships needing to recharge/cooldown. It sounds like an intresting mod idea for someone to test.

  • @Grizabeebles
    @Grizabeebles 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the idea that somewhere out in the deep periphery there are still high-tech civlizations on par with Star League which have never fallen to conflict. If a bare handful of planets had stayed more stable than the Clans, they would be a millenium more advanced than the Inner Sphere.
    Which means that out there somewhere - waiting in the dark - could be fleets of Warships searching for military adventurists who wander just a little too far from home.

  • @OrinThomas
    @OrinThomas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    New Warships have been in TROs up to TRO:3150 (and the subsequent TROs are complilations / new art). So not entirely forgotten.
    The revised StratOps is 186 pages and involves all the Aerospace (fighters through warships) combat & construction rules.
    Dropships and Jumpships is one of my favorite lore books. the Warships introduced in TRO 2750 are much preferred in design to the revised in TRO 3057.
    Some of the best Warship fiction in BattleTech involves the constant difficulty in invading Terra (Kerensky, Wob, ComStar, Stone, Clan Wolf). Especially the Kerensky Invasion where Amaris had drone warships out the wazoo and how the naval battle to even get to drop on Terra happened.
    As I think Herb said at one point - it is a lot cheaper to take out a warship than it is to build them.
    FASA's Renegade Legion Leviathan had some amazing Warship art - if you can find that TRO you'll be thanking yourself because giant fins in spades.

  • @nerag7459
    @nerag7459 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love all the battletech setting other than the mechs. We played the RPG and really appreciated how much time we spent at 1G accelerating and decelerating to the Jump ship. I loved how many drop ships were vertically oriented to account for this.

  • @No_1OfConsequence
    @No_1OfConsequence 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, that ship you like is a McKenna class battleship.
    The thing that killed off the Warship in the setting was the Ameris Civil War. After the catastrophic losses of the war itself, over 400 remaining Warships left with General Kerensky, and remained out in Clab space. The Federated Suns and the Draconis Combine fleets beat one another to death in a chance meeting engagement during the 1st Succession War. The Lyran fleet fought the remainder of the Draconis Combine fleet and the Free Worlds League fleets to mutual exhaustion, while the Capellans lost their fleet to the Free Worlds League and Federated Suns remnants.
    The 1st Succession War pretty much annihilated the House navys the way the Ameris Civil War ended the SLDF navy.

  • @jamesmorse6486
    @jamesmorse6486 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Thank you for adding your spin on the state of BattleSpace. The Black Pants legion also did a video regarding the history of Battletech Warships in their unique History Channelish approach.

  • @avollant
    @avollant 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    You should really talk about Renegade Legions... it too had cool warships. also a correction about the sails. Unless they changed the lore, the reason of those sail was not because the fusion reaction were not powerful enough to charge the K-F Drive but because its power was too strong for it. even at the top of the Star league, the K-F Drive were always a piece of a very fragile hardware. Only through the slow input of a solar sail, the K-F Drive could be charge safely. To circumvent the problem, many warships were equipped with batteries that could hold enough charge for a second jump. And if I remember correctly, it was the rediscovering of those batteries system that allowed the Inner Sphere to re-introduce the warships on the battlefield.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I do believe you're right about the batteries. Gotta re-read the Grey Death Legion books, now. Oh, woe is me!

    • @xxxlonewolf49
      @xxxlonewolf49 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are correct. The battery's, really more delicate capacitor in use. Had to be trickle/slow charged to avoid damaging them. Oddly the 2nd set of batteries that came about later for double jumps could be charged safely from a station...which was still fusion powered. Go figure.

    • @gregdomenico1891
      @gregdomenico1891 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The LF batteries were a part of it; it was the reintroduction of the compact KF drive that allowed them to do it. Even then, the FEDCOM and Combine had to buy the large in system drives from COMSTAR (they were the only ones who could make them at the time).
      And yes, they could charge the drives with the fusion engines; it just had to be at the same rate as a Solar Sail, to prevent damage to the KF Drive. (They could 'hot load' the charging, but drive damage ( or worse) could happen.

    • @OrinThomas
      @OrinThomas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have the Leviathans box set, scenarios and technical briefing (and all the Renegade Legion stuff honestly including Centurion, Interceptor, Leviathan, Prefect boxes, RPG and associated tech briefings) - and the art is wonderful and so different to BattleTech of the Era.

    • @OrinThomas
      @OrinThomas 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      th-cam.com/video/qAktBnD5viI/w-d-xo.html Video on The Leviathans ship book

  • @namechamps
    @namechamps 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This brought back some nostalgia. We played Battlespace back in they day with endless rule arguments because not only are the rules overly complex they were often poorly worded and there was no internet or FAQ to get a third party explanation. Still loved it although we were never really sure we were playing 100% by the rules. Also I am glad to know I am now vintage.
    I do agree with you that the ship designs had a realism that is lacking today. Any warship with a massive fusion drive and energy weapons would need massive radiators and in factor destroying said radiators may be a significant tactic because well you can't armor a radiator that well or at some point it becomes a not-radiator.

  • @caesarswgoh484
    @caesarswgoh484 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video. I remember reading the technical readout books and was so fascinated with warships - I loved the idea of these truly massive, engineering marvels that had become lost to time for so long.

  • @Echowhiskeyone
    @Echowhiskeyone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    BattleTech is all about Stompy Stompy 'Mechs. But you also have Areospace, Dropships, Jumpships, Warships, Mechwarriors, merchants, commerce, governments, deep space exploration and so much more. And if you don't pay you comm bills, Space AT&T will show you the error of your ways(don't ask how I know).

    • @jaredragland4707
      @jaredragland4707 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In the HBS game, "ComStar Presence" is enough to make a world a no-go forever more. Space AT&T: if you don't pay, they don't play.

  • @detpackman
    @detpackman 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i played aerotech and battlespace , we used both of the game systems for our large battletech campaigns one week would be the space campaign depending on whether or not we were defending or attacking , then do a planetary landing .
    there are a few warships that also had Mech bays to store mech and could drop the mechs in orbit using a special cocoons , one ship if i remember could hold mech regiment in such bays .
    we never played much with larger warships ,we mostly played with smaller assets cuz of the era we played in for our campaigns , but the combat was fun and you really had to keep track of your velocities or you could endup hitting something or off the game map

  • @theduchyofmilanball3157
    @theduchyofmilanball3157 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After watching the rest of your back catalogue, i am suddenly thankful for the absence of steve in this video.

  • @sardaukerlegion
    @sardaukerlegion 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In one of the BT novels was reported that before the discovery of the Helm Memory core in 3028,
    only 5 new Jumpship every year were built by automatic construction sites.

  • @joeblack5393
    @joeblack5393 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, what a wonderful video. The topic was so cool that i was even willing to overlook that Canadian "aboot" early on in the video.

  • @AccessAccess
    @AccessAccess 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When I played space combat was very much a thing. In one campaign we even managed to capture a disabled enemy dropship through boarding actions and fighting what crew was left to defend it with the mechwarrior (small arms) combat rules. In a prolonged campaign a dropship was the ultimate prize, since it allowed us to grow the unit and gain additional player characters (we would each play two or three mechwarriors). I do remember facing off against warships a few times but with the original aerotech rules they were basically paper tigers when going up against a well-trained fleet of aerospace fighters the like Stuka and Chippewa as the aerospace fighters were basically guaranteed to get off at least one alpha strike. With the punishing critical rules for spacecraft in general, this could be enough to disable or worse a dropship or a warship, so they were honestly often held back or only used with a large number of fighter escorts. That said, the inherent vulnerability of spacecraft and the inability to salvage much after a space battle meant that there really wasn't a whole lot to gain from a space battle, so often times both sides would simply back off and instead prefer to fight it out on the planet using mechs.

  • @franksmedley8619
    @franksmedley8619 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello Sci.
    Yeah, I am one of those 'vintage' players. I've played since Battle Droids, which became Battletech due to George Lukas' threatened lawsuit.
    So yeah, I did play Aerotech and the later rules for space combat on tabletops. Mostly, we fought such battles to determine if an attacker could bring everything it had to bear upon a planet being invaded. Most of the time, however, an attacker would not be able to do so, and would only have a portion of their overall force available to drop on a planetary target.
    Eventually, we subjected such things to die rolls, because actually playing out a system-wide battlefield would take several sessions of play, each taking many hours of game time to resolve. So, the random die rolls were used instead. Although such a system did not really reflect the chaos of battle, the valor and acumen of ship commanders, or just the vulgarities of lucky die rolls, they were used in any case, just to limit the amount of time needed to resolve the issue of how much force an attacker would have left to invade a planet with.
    So, sometimes an attacker would be able to get to a planet with everything, another time he would be 'beaten off' and fail to invade. Or, as happened most of the time, the attacker was limited to a portion of their attacking force being available to drop onto a planet.
    Modifiers were added to the die rolls to reflect the defender's forces. For instance: A high modifier if the planet was a major core world or industrial center, or the site of a major military base. A lesser modifier for 'lesser' planets and defenses, and finally, a null modifier for no defenses at all. By defenses, I mean such things as orbital defense platforms, fleets of extra-atmosphere fighters and bombers, and warships of any kind.
    As my group progressed, it became apparent that true warships were extremely rare, and often not able to be used due to the reasons you highlighted in your video.
    This led to us modifying, again, the die rolls for invasion forces, buy adding modifiers for 'conversion' craft. Basically 'Civilian' Jump Ships that had been outfitted with 'strap-on' fighter bays, heavy weaponry, and perhaps a tiny bit of 'armor'.
    Until the Clan Invasion, these Conversion Craft were 'warships'. One of the best reasons why the Clans were able to penetrate so deeply into the Inner sphere was their having actual warships available to sweep aside such Conversion Craft and invade with their full numbers.
    In 'modern' times, the 'space battle' portion of an invasion is 'hand waved' aside in favor of planetary combat on the surface of a world, or moon.
    If I could change anything about Battletech overall, it would be to have a series of die roll tables created and published, to simplify such battles and limit attackers to a portion of their entire starting strength. This would add 'realism' to the setting again, and allow for fleets engaging in combat, maneuvering, and sometimes withdrawing to save their strength for other battles.
    But all of this, pre-supposes a more strategic level of play. One where both attacker and defender must deal with pre-positioning forces, maneuvering said forces, and even splitting or combining forces to use in attack or defense. The manufacturing and placement of 'space-based' defenses like orbital platforms, and fleets of dropships converted to defensive use.
    Most 'current' gaming focuses on planetary combat, over space-based combat. So such a set of die roll tables, mentioned above, would simplify things enough to make pre-battle rolls important enough to use. If for no other reason than that an attacker might find himself without the forces needed to do more than a simple 'in and out' raid on a world, instead of the planned 'invasion' of it.

  • @Sethry406
    @Sethry406 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I could never get my friends to play Battlespace with me back in the day for some reason, but everyone liked Full Thrust. It was modular enough that we would play invasions in three stages. Full thrust rules for warships, Aerotech for near orbit fights to drop, and then Battletech for the stompy stuff. It wasnt perfect but it let me get some warship action in.
    Great vid, on a great day for the whole Battletech universe!

  • @braddl9442
    @braddl9442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the things about battle space, was it made it clear how insane space battles would be. Eventually it just becomes more cost effective to just fight the battles with way cheaper mechs and call it a day they risk super expensive and costly ships of which you can maybe make 1 to 3 of a year across an entire space nation of 1000s of planets. So the whole Space battles are rare even when the clans show up makes sense. Most areospace fights happen in the upper strat of planets when drop ships are incoming and need cover.

  • @whiskeyfur
    @whiskeyfur 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I remember a full on combined arms game where 4 factions of players in the game store, with 3 jumpships per faction and a whole universe to capture and control.
    And the politics... ooooooohhhh the in and out of game politics. Deal were made and broken over the orange chicken that were served next door.
    I had one of the jumpships and converted lances to full aerotech wings because the other two faction leaders couldn't understand things like gravatic sling maneuvers and the likes. My warship ended up being the fast response and fast-kill ship for when we needed to punish someone in a hit and run raid.
    And yea, nothing is more satisfying than watching an enemy jump out only to come in right behind them, start charging as the drop ships launch and then their wings to go and -waste- the factories with naval cannons, missles, bombs and strafing runs..
    By the time they turned around to grab my ship, we were gone, and whatever battle they WERE going to was an instant fail for them being a no show.
    They, were, pissed...

  • @UstraMage
    @UstraMage 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ive been re-reading the Battletech Ship book lately just for fun. Cool to hear this topic

  • @rudyvalle9022
    @rudyvalle9022 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember back in the day there was an aerotech mod for Homeworld. You could play with warships, dropships and some fighters. They didn’t add much before the devs quit but there was just enough to get a taste of real time aerotech combat.

  • @JumpingFlapjack
    @JumpingFlapjack 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Abonnent INCOMMING! ;)
    We all know from the lore that technology took a step backwards in the Succession Wars, but I think we often underestimate how severe that step backwards actually was. If you look at the few snippets of lore about full-blown space wars in Battletech, the warfare of even the clans is downright pathetic in comparison^^. And yes you are right I am not old, I am well matured and very vintage^^

  • @theodoreschott3293
    @theodoreschott3293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @joshuachapman247
    @joshuachapman247 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the episode, the battle tech space battles were really awesome. Operation Serpent - Space battle over Huntress. Also the later Space battles in Clan Space in The Wars of Reaving.

  • @alexs5814
    @alexs5814 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful video, great art and i thank you once again from the bottom of my heart for those in-depth insights into an amazing universe full of lore.

  • @andrewpolonsky2305
    @andrewpolonsky2305 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's gold :) Thank you for the reminder of this part of the battletech universe!

  • @solarchos4352
    @solarchos4352 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:30 - "Or literally melt..." OR EXPLODE LIKE A BOMB WHEN THE AMMUNITION DETONATES. This actually happened in a recent game of BattleTech that I'd joined. An enemy mech fired off so many weapons that its heat levels reached the point where the GM had to roll to see if there was an ammo explosion...and that's what happened.
    That pirate went out Epic on the Fury Road.

  • @sharlin648
    @sharlin648 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had so many happy brain chemicals from watching this as you was using the art I'd commissioned for my various Battletech projects :D

  • @SpiritWolf1966
    @SpiritWolf1966 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I enjoy all of Science Insanity videos

  • @loupgarou1317
    @loupgarou1317 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The FASA series of Technical Readouts , the 2750 one (before WOTC bought the series) has a section on aerospace fighters and warships.....this video had me dig that book out and look over those sections....

  • @JBRocky007
    @JBRocky007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I played AeroTech when it first came out so I never got into warships. But when it came to Aerospace fighters escorting dropships I had a blast.

  • @jtd8719
    @jtd8719 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The main challenge with the plausibility of space-based or true combined-arms combat in BT is that there is a very limited window for it to occur within the established history.
    1) a major impetus for 'mech-based combat in the setting is the adoption of the Ares Convention by most of the Inner Sphere powers recognizing that it's generally a bad thing to turn the surfaces of planet after planet into radioactive glass from orbit, and that warfare between the Great Houses needed to be a wee bit more limited, mainly from the perspective of populations that hadn't YET been bombarded from orbit (those that HAD suffered orbital bombardment were either dead or too busy surviving/dying to participate in politics)
    2) warships are incredibly complex and expensive to produce, maintain and replace
    3) a lot of the available warships abruptly left the IS with Kerensky's Exodus fleet after the Amaris Civil War
    4) most of the rest of the available warships along with facilities for building or repair were destroyed early in the Succession Wars
    5) any polity that had warships of any description left after the 3rd Succession War that were still functional wasn't going to risk them in combat without a VERY good reason
    For these reasons, any space-based battles in the setting would need to be set probably no later than the 2nd Succession War. And if set during the Star League Era, then probably limited to SLDF vs periphery state navies during the Reunification War or SLDF vs Rimworlds Republic/Terran Hegemony craft during the Amaris Civil War.

    • @LionlordEbonfire
      @LionlordEbonfire 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If they can sell enough games then that would not be the history of Battletech. Someone would have started cranking out more warships in game if it sold better.

    • @jtd8719
      @jtd8719 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LionlordEbonfire Not sure exactly the point you are making, but I think the expanded aerospace/naval rules were introduced sometime after the base histories had already been established. Fortunately, CGL doesn't require the use of 'official' models, so we are free to include space naval assets in scenarios (and homemade models) if we want. I was just pointing out that the opportunities to do so within the canon were limited, even though the rules incorporate these units.

    • @LionlordEbonfire
      @LionlordEbonfire 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jtd8719 I am saying that the cannon would be altered to increase support of the space game if it sold more. As it did not sell better, they did not write the lore with that in mind. Lore supports the game not vise versa.

  • @ltcinsane
    @ltcinsane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I was amused that towards the end of the fedcom civil war they nearly had no warships left and it seemed like the Clans were the only ones left with proper warships left. I remember in one of the novels the Ghost Bears had built one big mofo of a warship.

    • @jamesperkins191
      @jamesperkins191 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Leviathan Class
      They had three of them, essentially moved their whole nation to Rasalhague in them

  • @ferallion3546
    @ferallion3546 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been playing since 89 and the BT universe is massive and a lot of fun.
    Very much worth diving into.

  • @murgel2006
    @murgel2006 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    FASA once produced the Renegade Legion universe, containing LEVIATHAN and INTERCEPTOR etc. Well, those space games were not as successful as BATTLETECH was.
    Sobody once told me (or I read it somewhere?) that the BATTECH rules for spaceship combat were a derivate of many of the LEVIATHAN rules. Maybe they thought that the interest would be minor?
    I loved the Renegade Legion games as much as BT and was really sad when FASA stoped the line.

  • @namefinder
    @namefinder 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Using Battlespace and just simplifying the heat management somewhat makes for a fantastic space combat game

  • @seannewboy8612
    @seannewboy8612 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The truly amusing thing about this is that FASA also made Renegade Legion which was awesome.

    • @spencesanders7879
      @spencesanders7879 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep, Centurion, Interceptor, Leviathan and Prefect were the four games in the set. I was really disappointed when they abandoned them to concentrate on BT.

    • @seannewboy8612
      @seannewboy8612 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@spencesanders7879 prefect? Missed that one, I can guess, sector level game?

    • @spencesanders7879
      @spencesanders7879 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seannewboy8612 Yes. IIRC each game would interface with the next lower game. At the Prefect level you dispatched fleets or task groups. You used Leviathans (Warships and Fighters by group) to fight to control the system. Interceptor (fighters and gunboats) to control the orbitals and dropships. Centurion to take the battle to the surface. I've played Leviathans/Interceptor/Centurion. Never tried the Prefect part.

    • @seannewboy8612
      @seannewboy8612 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@spencesanders7879 I played the same.

  • @bouncymischa
    @bouncymischa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I found the comment about the Free World's League struggling to field any warships (around the 19:00 mark) interesting, because I'd just been reading the 3067 Technical Manual, and in their warships section ComStar notes that the Free World's League (in 3067, at least) had a bigger Warship fleet than any of the other Great Houses, and roughly on par with some of the Clan fleets. I couldn't find any specific numbers, although I seem to recall once reading that the Snow Ravens had the most Warships of any Clan with 40 ships, so I'm guessing it wasn't *that* big. But still interesting to see how the different factions can definitely rise and fall.

    • @scienceinsanity6927
      @scienceinsanity6927  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yea sometimes I'm just wrong or make mistakes. I think i was remembering the post 2070 lore there since the free worlds league literally doesn't exist going forwards from that point. The faction officially dissolves into like, 20 smaller states.
      Their economy goes to shit, their industry goes to shit, their military goes to shit. The jihad era is a fustercluck of trash writing and retcons so there's a lot of stuff that doesn't make sense. That's why i always refuse to talk about lore from that age forwards because everything is chaos.

    • @bouncymischa
      @bouncymischa 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scienceinsanity6927Fair enough -- as I mentioned, the only reason it occurred to me is because I'd just read that one particular Technical Manual. XD
      That all said, your comment got me thinking about how the FWL collapsed to being pretty much on the level of a Periphery State, and that reminded me that I'm certain there was one Periphery state that managed to operate a Warship. It might've been the Taurian Concordat because I know they were salvaging the TCS Vandenberg, but I seem to recall one of the later sourcebooks mentioned someone in the Periphery sailing a Warship between their worlds in order to deter pirate attacks -- which, you have to admit, it would do a good job of doing.
      As you mentioned, the Jihad and post-Jihad eras are pretty messed up narratively, but I still thought it was an interesting detail.

  • @lipot69
    @lipot69 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I totally enjoy your Battletech(Battle Droids)/Aero Tech/Battle Space episodes. Especially given that most of my material from that universe is from when it was still own FASA. (I have one reprint novel that has the WizKids branding.) And you are correct about the models, although I do have one of the rare plastic ones (an Unseen Battlemaster).

  • @boxfoxscoot1614
    @boxfoxscoot1614 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the problem with warships existing is they are so comparatively powerful they make the whole rest of the setting pointless

  • @samanderson7057
    @samanderson7057 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Part of the in universe reason/justification was the cost-benefit of 'throwing suns,' Mechs formations while expensive were not valuable enough to typically warrant the expense; a Warship however was almost always worth a few. This meant that warships needed extensive armor for near misses and heavy screening to prevent direct hits. Add in the compact jump drive, normal engines, reactor, radiators, and very little was left for weapons. The 'natural scale' of a warship based on tech available was too big for anyone to actually build one until the clans miniaturized the tech and had way too many resources to throw at the problem. Even then warships are deployed very carefully with support assets to prevent multiple direct hits. This nicely drags the spotlight back to the big stompy mechs from the cover art.

    • @jakeg3733
      @jakeg3733 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True. The other big factor was the debasement of the Inner Sphere and their tech base. They managed to wreck all of their warships (with a couple notable exceptions) in around a century. After massive devastation to all the houses, a feudalistic model was adopted alongside chivalrous ROE (don't blow up that water treatment plant because it can't be rebuilt). Under those rules warships are redundant wastes of money and resources. All that mattered was getting your fighting force from the jump point to the target, and armed dropships were good enough for that at a fraction of the cost. So of course, the IS eventually lost the knowledge to even build miniature KF drives, and since no one had them anymore it didn't matter until the Clans showed up, providing the impetus to redevelop that tech ASAP

    • @jamesperkins191
      @jamesperkins191 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And even the Clans didn't use tgwm much as they normally got bid away in their batchalls

  • @jdtusler
    @jdtusler 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is such a weirdly timed video... Today I was thinking about existing tabletop space combat games I've played that died out in my area. Battlefleet Gothic, Star Wars Armada, Firestorm Armada, etc. And how much I missed tabletop space fleet games. I've been getting into Battletech Alpha Strike recently and was thinking about how cool it would be to have a space combat game with similar mechanics. Simultaneous shooting and what have you. It's really awesome that you released this video today. It gives me some context into the possibility of such a game. You rock.

    • @mrbigglezworth42
      @mrbigglezworth42 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There has to be a middle ground with Tabletop space war games in terms of mechanical depth and actual playability. I bought the SW:Armada starter box hoping to get some friends into it to play with, but none of them really had the patience to learn it as readily as Alpha Strike. Which at the very least was mostly intuitive to learn and understand, doubly so with the hex sheets I was using to teach them.

    • @jdtusler
      @jdtusler 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I actually really did enjoy SW Armada, but it died out very quickly in my area. Though I did come into it late. It was reasonably easy to pick up (I thought) and had some depth to it. But I think you can only do so much with 2 major factions. They did do some Clone Wars Era stuff but it fizzled out really fast after Atomic Mass Games took over. Maybe there's a space between 3D printing and some home design where someone could make a clever Battletech Warship game work as Alpha Strike does for people like me. Those who love the universe and theme, but cant really invest the attention into Classic BT.

  • @Kaiju-Driver
    @Kaiju-Driver 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would love to see more of this in the mainstream. I factor in fleet logistics in my total war campaign. My players love it.

  • @jefferywienhoff7678
    @jefferywienhoff7678 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Battlespace was my first Battletech product (along with Clan Wolf and Clan Jade Falcon sourcebboks). This was my entry point into the game.

  • @axehammer3850
    @axehammer3850 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video from an old timer who misses the good old days. I also like your background music throughout the video.

    • @dylanward555
      @dylanward555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you haven't yet, you need to play FTL: Faster Than Light. Battletech players tend to love it, and it has a wonderful soundtrack. The music you hear in these videos is from FTL.

  • @filanfyretracker
    @filanfyretracker 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Warships sound like the Battletech version of the nuclear powered aircraft carrier. It takes a lot of resources to field even one and its related support ships let alone multiple battle groups.

  • @andrewnelson4148
    @andrewnelson4148 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    By the way the picture you have 21:50 is in fact the McKenna Class Battleship form the TRO:2750 manual. There is a different design in the TRO:3057 manual.

  • @logion567
    @logion567 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a massive Warship officianado who re-reads the various fluffy bits in StratOps far too often, I can offer some insight into the logistical importance of Warships. Even the smaller sub-500kt designs like the Carrack or Fox is a massive boost to a campaigns chance fo success even if they're outgunned by some of the post-jihad "Pocket Warship" designs

  • @TheOntos
    @TheOntos 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You forgot the boats and submarines (there are a couple). Total combined armed combat across every place people can fight.

    • @gmradio2436
      @gmradio2436 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      AV-IV equiped subs can be fun.

    • @bthsr7113
      @bthsr7113 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gmradio2436 Ever hear of the Wyrm? It's a submergable planet side SDS, mobile base, and yes, it's a Wobbie toy.

    • @gmradio2436
      @gmradio2436 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bthsr7113No, I had not. What can you tell me.

    • @bthsr7113
      @bthsr7113 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gmradio2436 Buckle up, it's a doozy.
      6 hexes long by 5 hexes wide by 10 levels tall (180m, 150m, 60m)
      4,588 Heat sinks
      150 points of armor per hex.
      DEEP BREATH
      36 LRT20 ART IV
      28 SRT6 ART IV
      16 ERLL
      4 LVSPL
      48 MPL
      12 ERPPC
      8 Arrow IV
      8 Gauss Rifle
      16 LB2XAC
      32 laser AMS
      And for the big boys in orbit or the upper atmosphere,
      4 Naval Laser 55's
      4 Barracudas
      2 Killer Whales and for the final touch,
      1 Killer Whale-T.
      There's a lot of other stuff that isn't weapons, sinks, or armor, and over 800 crew as well. Comes in at a final battle value of 47,010. Frankly, I'd be terrified to see what an all clan tech version by Sea Fox for a new home world could look like.

  • @ChristopherSloane
    @ChristopherSloane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I followed Battletech from when I was a kid back in the 80's and from what I understand Some of the warships were so devastating they could dominate a planet and were simply over powered in some regards. The games never caught on because the lore simply ended the existence of said warships. Then finding one was something akin to finding the most prized item in the universe.

  • @andreaslermen2008
    @andreaslermen2008 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Renegade Legion (also from FASA) had another chunky ships table top game called Leviathan.

    • @LionlordEbonfire
      @LionlordEbonfire 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They parallel a lot more. Both had ship, fighter Planetside games. Both had RPGs. Both had strategic level play. But Battletech had Mechs that looked like Macros, set up and played faster.

  • @primusavenged
    @primusavenged หลายเดือนก่อน

    i had no idea battletech ships had heat radiators. love to see a setting address the fact that you can't conduct heat away in the vacuum of space

  • @dr.johnh.watson2444
    @dr.johnh.watson2444 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    in my local hobby store there are still alot of metal space models as well as the rule books and a huge beginners box for it.

  • @extremesheepdawg6379
    @extremesheepdawg6379 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been playing B T since 1991. Introduced to it by a friend and fellow soldier shortly after arriving at my first duty station in Geissen Germany while in processing the unit and out processing for deployment to Desert Storm. It was the second table top game that I had ever played. D&D was the first. Over the years I have played many variations of many games. B T and its variants have always been a favorite of mine. Too bad there are so few tabletop players within a reasonable distance of me. Most of them don’t play M W or B T. If they do it’s the computer game version. I play those as well. (All things Mechwarrior are fun). I even love using the advanced / experimental rules. They really open up new possibilities. I designed a mech that can run 1.5 times around the map border PER TURN. Any failed piloting checks end SPECTACULARLY. On the flip side: almost impossible to hit. A TAG unit and lance mates with Arrow IVs , L R M 20s, etc. oh, I failed to mention the E C M… MRC-FTD Mercury Delivery. 40 tons of stealthy, speedy, target acquisition and scouting for a lance that doesn’t want to waste ammunition and demands results.

  • @lokai7914
    @lokai7914 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I watched it all and enjoyed it greatly!

  • @DrendarMorevo
    @DrendarMorevo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Small correction, ComStar still had warships when the Clan Invasion started.

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    9:22 JumpShips are effectively space stations that "jump" they don't move around system like warships

    • @lordsherifftakari4127
      @lordsherifftakari4127 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      they can operate "in system" but rarely do so save for moving to an in system Yard for service or repair.
      at best, their drives can give them .5G of thrust at max burn. though .1G is more common if they do have to move.
      compare this to some Warships who if pressed, can throttle up to 4G's of acceleration!

  • @mickbrown7793
    @mickbrown7793 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    speed of charging a jumpdrive isn't why jumpships use jumpsails. Any jumpship can hot-charge its drive off reactors far faster than a jumpsail - fast enough to potentially wreck the K-F drive. The use of the jumpdrive is because fusion reactors use hydrogen fuel and it takes vast quantities to charge a jumpdrive (pre-jumpsail ships usually could only make 10 jumps without refulling). Jumpsails are used because they're cheaper in the long run.

  • @luthorcorp0
    @luthorcorp0 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Appreciate your battletech videos!

  • @delaneyalusa
    @delaneyalusa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Our Northern Colorado has played several space battles. Some rules we had to make, because the rules are vague. It was fun

  • @lorddrakewater2166
    @lorddrakewater2166 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this type of stuff is why i love this setting

  • @mathewkelly9968
    @mathewkelly9968 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    14:32 and just like modern militaries the lines between corvettes , frigates , destroyers , the various kinds of cruisers , battleships etc are more guidelines more than one Alaska is it a heavy cruiser/BattleCruisers in there .

  • @liljenborg2517
    @liljenborg2517 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's ironic, because the depth of Battletech lore is largely to due to the fact that it was developed to explain why an interstellar civilization fights with 80-ton trippable tanks on a planetary surface instead of with fleets of FTL warships.
    We only tried Aerospace once back in the day (late 80s). I liked that there were things like gravity and conserved momentum instead of being like Star Wars with WWII fighter planes in space (you could actually slingshot around a planet!). It just didn't have a good method to be truly 3D.
    But it took FOREVER to play out one scenario - and it also had the same basic problem as the whole setting had - hitting ANYTHING at range was flippin' impossible unless you were incredibly lucky with the dice (there were so many modifiers +2 for their movement, +2 for your movement, +2 because there was an asteroid on the map, +2 because someone flushed a toilet on one of the drop ships, +4 because of the range - okay, you have to roll an -6 or lower on 2D6 for your LRMs to hit - and if they do hit you have to roll on the cluster table to find out only half of them hit anyway).
    So, when we wanted to play starships in space we played the rather dumbed down rules of Star Fire. I haven't tried the tabletop version of Honor Harringtion to compare.

  • @satricv
    @satricv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I still have my copy of this stuff, though if you really want math in a space table-top game, the original B5 miniature game is your game. Though GAWD its minis were beautiful, I swear no other setting beats B5 for beauty in its ships, and for the longest time realism in onscreen combat, the keeping of momentum no matter your facing. Thats the series that started that.

  • @danielva1011
    @danielva1011 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    12:34 SCI: How many sci-fi ships do you see actually look anything like this?
    The Human Reach ships and Spacecraft from Children of A Dead Earth (if you squint…) Also anything from Chris Floss

  • @dantewilliams2757
    @dantewilliams2757 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably some of my favorite starship designs in fiction

  • @zachklopfleisch8501
    @zachklopfleisch8501 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I learned vector addition in junior high in the 90s by playing Aerotech, it's definitely a crunchy game.

  • @Khymerion
    @Khymerion 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I know you mentioned the nations not having a navy but you really should take a look at the Outworlds Alliance/Clan Snow Raven/The Raven Alliance... the last naval power in the Inner Sphere, or at least the Periphery. After all, the Outworlds Alliance was big on ASFs, Snow Raven believed in maintaining warships and a navy, and they unified to create a small stellar empire that maintains two space naval academies as well as naval facilities.

  • @benparker1822
    @benparker1822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it would be a hard thing to retcon, but the idea of singular warships plying the lanes, as either planetary defenders or as mobile home bases for pirates and mercs, captain Harloc style, would have worked for the 3rd Succession War era. Because, the only way to have space battles, even fleeting ones, would be to have the stuff available to create that battle.

  • @DadalorianCreates
    @DadalorianCreates 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i am a first gen [vintage] player so I bought Battletroops, Battlespace, CityTech, AeroTech, and TROs as they were released... with all of the license holders and years that followed I still have all of my original materials ... the exciting thing (to me) is "stompy robots' (as the five year old calls BTA3062) has really peeked her interest and I am going to start teaching her Table Top soon. she is super excited and interested. I am committed to require her to start where I did, base weapons and the original mechs (locust, wasp, stinger, wolv, SH, Griff, Cat, Marauder, Orion, Warhammer, panther, PH, etc - you know... from the white book) we will use my old cardboard stand up mechs and you know... all the ol'FASA materials... after tt BT i will probable get her into Shadowrun...

  • @alessandrof.1359
    @alessandrof.1359 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love your channel Star gate, BSG, Battletech everything is represented and your humor is great. I'm starting to wonder if you know Eve online

  • @jamesarmyvet
    @jamesarmyvet 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had the original aerotech box set but a flood hit and lot it and half my battletech boxes i had bought all durring the 80s. 😢