Categorical Syllogisms (part 3)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- This short video is the third part of the series on setting up and evaluating syllogisms in Aristotelian, or Term, Logic. In this video we explore how to use Venn diagrams to test for validity, as well as the five rules for valid Categorical Syllogisms.
Now I know why there are moods that are weak... they are conditionally valid on the the Aristotelian point of view. Not something discussed in my Logic class. Thanks.
Thanks to you, my final exam went great, thank you!
I'm so glad you found the videos helpful. Thanks for watching!
Thank you very much sir❤
Thank you for this video! It's really a big help
I'm glad you found it helpful!
@@ALittleBitofPhilosophywhat is this 😊right now i q die frage dich mal auf die welt die frage 😅😅 und was ist mit dem wetter die herren ich bin in der stadt 🎉😊😊 ich bin 😊gerade im hotel is können wir die wohnung nicht mit to u der adresse von der arbeit in 😮 und wir wünschen einen guten rutsch dich mal t und sind jetzt was ich ich 😮quiz ich bin jetzt schon wieder da bin noch in der schule du kannst du 😅p und sollte das ta für 😅 und der wohnung in der deutschland in der nähe und das ist das was ich dir gesagt hat dass du es nicht willst p und sind dann in diesem moment of course we can go go back way to get the house done and get i and i die herren der stadt war heute in berlin bei 😅 ich bin heute abend mit der oma in die die herren und ich habe gerade meine freundin 🎉 in den kindergarten teacher at all times the last 😅 und sind 😅jetzt mit the best part🎉😊 i 😂der kinder i und sind jetzt in schon in in der nähe aber aber das ist ja auch aw r😮 hast doch heute😊🎉 ich hab mich 😮😢😂😢😮😮 is 😢😂😊😅😂😢😢❤😅😮❤ 18:37 18:37 18:37
18:37
18:37 18:37
This is really helpful thanks
I'm so glade I could be of service.
Is there a way to dowlowd these slides?
You can visit my website (barry.f.vaughan.org) where you'll find them under "Class Notes" in each of the courses I teach.
Thanks for watching!
And what about this approach?
1) Расчёт силлогизмов модусов ААА, AAI (All-All…) /РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ - 1 / Сalculation of syllogisms of modes AAA, AAI (All-All...) / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC - 1 th-cam.com/video/NMDlodgZYfc/w-d-xo.html
2) 09-02. Расчёт силлогизмов модусов АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx… / РАЗГАДКА «Бермyдских треугoльников» ЛОГИКИ-2 / Calculation of syllogisms of modes АIх, AOx, IAx, OAx... / SOLVING THE "Bermuda Triangles" OF LOGIC-2: th-cam.com/video/9-aWMfCIgk4/w-d-xo.html 🙂
Why is AOO-4 invalid? (not in the video)
Sorry so long in getting back to you, I'm utterly swamped. AAO-4 has an undistributed middle term.
@@ALittleBitofPhilosophy thank you for your reply.
AFTER the CORRECT FORMAL RECORDING OF the INITIAL JUDGMENTS OF ANY POLYSYLLOGISM AND/OR A SYLLOGISM, ITS INFERENCE IS EASILY CALCULATED IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE USUAL LAWS OF THE ALGEBRA OF LOGIC. Seems, for example yours example EII-1 (19:08):
1. No Fish are birds
2. Some parrots are not fish
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3. Therefor, some parrots are birds
You think this conclusion is wrong. Yes, you're right. Only a legitimate question arises: On the basis of what did you make this stupid (19:48) conclusion?
Algebraic calculation: x - fish, y - berds, z - parrots
1. No Fish are birds (x’y)
2. Some parrots are not fish (zx’+zx)
- - - Calculate: ((x’y)* (zx’+zx))/X = (x’yz)/X = yz = zy
3. There is birds which a parrots. [=There is parrots which a birds].
This is only one VALID conclusion.
ANY POLYSYLLOGISM AND/OR A SYLLOGISM, ITS INFERENCE IS EASILY CALCULATED IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE USUAL LAWS OF THE ALGEBRA OF LOGIC ! :-)))