Francis Fukuyama on "The Origins of Political Order," 10/6/11
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Francis Fukuyama discusses "The Origins of Political Order," at U.C. Berkeley's International House on October 6, 2011. The lecture was part of the I-House 'Globalization Series.'
Aside from the great content, his vocabulary is marvelous. A very knowledgeable man. can play a valuable role in the government.
The first teacher who makes sense.
Political institutions and forms of government cannot be imposed on nations by external actors and hope to succeed. That is a big part of the problem with America's current foreign policy. Often our, and other developed countries, interfere for their own advantage under the guise of helping.
A hierarchy does not have a purpose but to have the many rule themselves, in other words that is the best wish a king has on his people that they become independent mentally themselves, a hierarchy dissolves itself as it evolves. And that is the result of education civilization for the many.
fukuyama is genius
well Mr Fukuyama is correct about present condition of India but he is kind of legitimising fossilised brahminical order. He doesn't seems to explain why caste system is perticular to India State development. He has also undermined various facts of history where brahmans, shudras mobilised the army and ran the state.
I did not know that about denmark
As it can be derived in a meaning from the alias I use here, at most cases it is probably pointless and without a trophy, nonetheless it has never hurt anyone ( "gibberishing") in English. (What's the worst it can happen.....!) Learn more English.....!?!?
For anyone interested, and anyone should seriously be. There is only one way to think, study, understand and if really good at as a consequence, put into practice what is known as science.
In fact what I am about to refer, relates to everything in relation to begin on earth in this universe, not just science.
What I point to is already a field of serious and objectionable study together with practice in science as we speak.
It is generally and very specifically known as (Statistical Mechanic's).
It branches and reaches out as an octopus in almost every other field in science, which I suspect is the reason why it is often frowned upon as a unwanted intruder.
Intentionally or unintentionally the field as it stands in the current form in science got initiated, developed and continues to be maintained from the first word used, that of statistical, which is a derivation of the word statistic (which oddly enough it has a plural form also, as statistics (( go figure that one out ))).
With the word mechanics, most likely referring to the ins and outs of (statistics).
Yet if the two words are read as presented (statistical mechanics), anyone understands (in the wrong way) the word mechanics to be the main protagonist.
Although the field is very compact with complexity, it's true from is even more complex yet very simple to understand as a general structure of all totality in relation to everything, and it is very much interconnected with the word statistic.
This word, (the word statistic/s) are in fact two words, one being (state) the other (static) with (statistical) forming a third word which overrides the word (statistics) once this is split in two, that of (state) and (static).
With that in mind, the whole general structure of what is known as (statistical mechanics) is involved in this....!
Anyone should sense, think, initiate (as in case of mathematics), develop and maintain ( a state ).
With that (state) sensed, thought, initiated, developed and maintained, anyone should find and establish ( a static form of that state).
((Which in all cases involves a precise or some kind of measure, hence (static) unmovable)).
Having achieved in finding and establishing ( a static form of a state )....!
Then anyone can proceed in recording the (statistical data analysis) of every try, ( a static form of a state ) has been found and established by anyone.
The point of all thought, is related in always ending in one way or another with exactly (the same) in structure as the (state) that is sensed, thought, initiated, developed and maintained.
Exactly as it is in reality of everything, all of it.
With this in mind....!
If anyone hears a sentence in the form of (physics is stuck).
Anyone should understand that physics is not stuck!
Physics is at war.
In fact physics has been at war, together with almost every other field in relation to human beings existence for as far as very far.
Because what I have just referred to as an explanation to (statistical mechanics) has been known before recorded history. Philosophy, religion, any other social systems, agriculture, farming, even specific ancient and modern architecture together with everything in the universe, including humans and life itself, fallows this structure.
The war involves the finding and establishing ( a static form of a state), and then running as many tries of that as (statistical data analysis) over and over, more and more with no end.
All under the reason and logic of the need to understand, which fails once it is noted and pointed out that no attempt to reach the structure of the original state (known as equilibrium, which is the way all functions), is there to be found.
Meaning not getting back to the original state, equilibrium and that is very important not just for being.
(It is how all experiments work, it is how invention works. Going to the start with a different understanding and in many cases with more understanding of that start, simply because a state is impossible.)
Why is that a problem should be asked....!
It is a problem, because any new try of finding and establishing ( a static form of a state ) without the aim of reaching the original structure form of that ( state )/equilibrium, turns out in becoming a new ( state ) and a new and a new and so on.
Which means that ( states ) that are not sensed immediately, thought, initiated, developed and maintained are involved in the process, plus no (static form) of such states is there as found and established in measure, (by not being aware off) in the immediate sensing, thinking, initiating developing and maintaining of any such ( state ), making in almost all cases, any amount of ( statistical data analysis gathered in such a method ) be pointless in a long term when involving more interconnected complex systems as a totality of all.
(Similar to a light multiplayer in experiments.)
What is a state....?
House is a state.
What is a static...?
Building a house, any house is a static.
What is a statistical...?
The measure of every try a house has been built on planet earth throughout all the period of human existence is a statistical.
The same goes for everything including human beings, water, light, fire, stone, vegetation and all life, gas, any systems, all matter, the known and unknown, even numbers after nine.
Almost everything goes after this process to the structure of the original state, at equilibrium, without any hidden variables once (and this is the important part) the (state) and it's (static form) is understood more and more, over and over.
After this ( a statistical data analysis ) becomes that which it is.
A necessity for whatever reason and logic.
But as it is well known throughout history as very far back, the most important part is in sensing, thinking, initiating, developing, and maintaining a state, any state, all being impossible.
Because once that is with and within anyone everything else is easy.
While the advantage for some imperial/imperical reasons seems to be with the static side ("unmovable measure"), making the ( statistical data analysis of any, literally any field ) fail as often as it does in relation to the totality of science or anything else, hence the absurd need to keep at it over and over and over, also known as error.
((It has to be made very clear.... that all that exist on planet earth and it's closest orbits, especially as a result of direct human intervention, together with all of the knowledge, is a result of a human being (state), and despite all of the magnificent achievements....!
We human beings, still don't know, neither we understand, what this (state) of being human is.
Although we have by now billions of found and established (static forms) off, and thousands and thousands of years in (statistical data analysis) also running into billions, and combinations off, so when the best of the best "in knowledge" put forward the ideas such as (((machines, A.I, technology, robot's etc etc can "think"))).....
All anyone of a sound mind can do in order to magnify that type of "stupid magnificence" is to ask...!
What is the (state) o you enlightened one ? To anyone, including their very own self.))
Why is it considered a unwanted intruder...!?!?
Because it shows clearly without any doubt, that what is considered a new modern scientific structure, is in fact as old as any religion, faith or philosophy, in principle it is as old as human existence.
The only difference is that one model uses a state related or as being (light) and to that state very precise "unmovable" static measure's are applied through found and established properties of that state.
While the other models use a unknown unidentifiable state, and very abstract and (unmovable) in relation to what is considered abstract static measures, which then are applied through found and established abstract properties of that state.
One uses, speed, distance, weight, mass, area etc etc, while the other uses abstract principles such as a name, beauty, powerful, forgiveness, mighty, destructive etc etc.
And the irony of it is that through the same structure one fails at everything that is not light, (which is most of everything) while the other much archaic one, whatever the conditions, never fails.
All one has to do is use any efficient measuring techniques. Meaning anyone at any given point, when there, all they have to do is to say in the beginning there was a blob, and present a measure of the blob.
The difference is very important, as it serves the purpose of dividing what is in fact united in the exact same state.
This (advice is related to anyone wanting to be a scientist), if on the other hand anyone wants to be a profession any profession....!
A calculator, book keeper, amplifier, a finder's keeper etc etc That also involves in understanding the state of that profession
© Miri
14 March 2023
He is trying to describe how Political Order evolved historically, rather than arguing for which political order is the preferred.
I am halfway through his book. It spans many disciplines. A bit like Jared Diamonds booka in a sense drawing a large picture. Try it!
As for neocon. I think he has moved away from neocon in towards the center.
1) I think Jeffersonian ideas are very important in the American psyche
2) I don't think he's a "Chinese-Communist worshiper". This lecture was more "positive" than "normative".