ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2022
- One of the most common objections presented by those who deny the attack upon Lady Fatima is that such an act of oppression was unlikely in the presence of a strong and brave warrior like Imam Ali.
Was Imam Ali standing silent as the oppressors set fire to his house? Find the truth in this episode.
#FatimiyyaTheBurningQuestions
================================================
► MAKE THAQLAIN REACH 100K SUBSCRIBERS:
bit.ly/SubscribeToThaqlain
► BECOME A MEMBER ON TH-cam:
/ @thaqlain
► HELP US CREATE MORE CONTENT:
thaqlain.org/support
► CONNECT ON WHATSAPP:
wa.link/hfcf0g
► FOLLOW US:
Facebook: / thaqlain
Instagram: / thaqlainmedia
![Night 1 | The Mystical Reality of Fatima Al-Zahra [as] | Dr. Sayed Ammar Nakshawani, Fatimiyah 2022](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GwNwm-HOlp8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Night 1 | The Mystical Reality of Fatima Al-Zahra [as] | Dr. Sayed Ammar Nakshawani, Fatimiyah 2022](/img/tr.png)
Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S:
I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt).
II) Subscribe: Connect with us on TH-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1
III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
Allah hu akbar
Ya Ali ❤️
Ya Fatima ❤️
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
@@ramizparkar4199 don't believe.
I don't care.
I will believe that Abu Bakr and Umar burn the house of hazrat Fathima.
They made fabricated Hadith about prophet Muhammad inheritance.
Tell me prophet Muhammad(sws) Didn't tell his Daughter about That hadeeth. who will going to become his Heir. And he tell other who didn't even his relatives..
When Shia says Many people become Hypocrite after prophet sunni start saying No No if this was happened that means prophet failed in his mission. And when the topic of fadak comes sunni start telling that Fathima didn't know abou hadeeth..
And btw Haidare karrar grabbed Umar and put him down and he was going to cut the neck of Umar then he remembered the last wishes of prophet Muhammad. And he stopped themselves...
What is your opinion on 13 yeas6of prophet Muhammad life when he was living in mountain and facing problems. Why he didn't do anything?? For 13 years??
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
Jazakallah for sharing sucha a question asked by many individuals
and Alhamdulillah it was very well explained
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
اللهم صل على محمد وال محمد
احسنتم يا سيد الله بارك بيك
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
Mashala😢
Alhamdulillah Yaa Allah Yaa Ali
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
Thank you so much for all the knowledge Sayed Mahdi Modarresi and Thaqlain 🖤⚘️ Allah swt bless and protect you always 🤲🏻❤️
اللهم صل على محمد وعلى آل محمد وعجل فرجهم
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
❤️🤲🏻
Thank you and Allah bless you always. Great lessons learned. Long Live thr followers of Ahlulbayt.
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
@ramizparkar4199 Remember everything that happened to Imam Ali it was a test for him and the Muslims. Then answer this question. Why did Fatima Zahra was angry with Abubakr and Omar when she passed away. Remember she is one of women of paradise just not any woman. She didn't allow Abubakr and Omar to come to her Burial and her burial was hidden from them. I hope you research these and not follow Islam blindly and know that there were lots of hypocrites that wanted to get rid of the family of the prophet and real Islam.
@@azataliking8302 Reportedly, Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’ was angry with Abu Bakr, after she met him over Fadak, shortly after the death of her father the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ),
so do you have a hadith which says that Umar et al. attacked Sayyidah Fatimah in her house, before or after she argued with Abu Bakr over Fadak,
before telling me that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib did not protect his wife, after the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said "Whomsoever I am a Maula of, then Ali is his Mawla" at Ghadir Khumm?
@@azataliking8302 But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
May Allah bless you shaykh WAllah I love you
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such horrible crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
@@ramizparkar4199and Sayeda Fatima (as) answered Abu bakr from the Qur'an when he stole the land of Fadak. If prophet's do not leave behind inheritance then how did Prophet Solayman inherit from his father Prophet Dawwud his kingdom? Or does inheritance only belong to some and to the family of the prophet are not entitled to inheritance? This hadith contradicts the Qur'an so you throw the hadith away. Simple
@@HR-313 I know that even Sunni ahadith say disturbing things, like that Abu Bakr stole Fadak from Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, after the departure of her father the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ),
and Sunnis insist that their ahadith, in books like Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, are "sahih" or "authentic", while ignoring what they say about the family of the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ),
but Allah (ﷻ) promised Jannah to the Muhajirun and Ansar in the Qur’an (4:100; 9: 100-118),
and these ahadith, whether Sunni or Shi‘ite, should never be used to contradict what Allah said in His Book!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلـنِّـسَـٓاءِ:
۞ وَمَن يُهَاجِرْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللهِ يَجِدْ فِي الْأَرْضِ مُرَاغَمًا كَثِيرًا وَسَعَةً ۚ وَمَن يَخْرُجْ مِن بَيْتِهِ مُهَاجِرًا إِلَى اللهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ثُمَّ يُدْرِكْهُ الْمَوْتُ فَقَدْ وَقَعَ أَجْرُهُ عَلَى اللهِ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿١٠٠﴾
سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلـتَّـوۡبَـةَ:
وَالسَّابِقُونَ الْأَوَّلُونَ مِنَ الْمُهَاجِرِينَ وَالْأَنصَارِ وَالَّذِينَ اتَّبَعُوهُم بِإِحْسَانٍ رَّضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا عَنْهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي تَحْتَهَا الْأَنْهَارُ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا أَبَدًا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ الْفَوْزُ الْعَظِيمُ ﴿١٠٠﴾
...
لَّقَد تَّابَ اللهُ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ وَالْمُهَاجِرِينَ وَالْأَنصَارِ الَّذِينَ اتَّبَعُوهُ فِي سَاعَةِ الْعُسْرَةِ مِن بَعْدِ مَا كَادَ يَزِيغُ قُلُوبُ فَرِيقٍ مِّنْهُمْ ثُمَّ تَابَ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ إِنَّهُ بِهِمْ رَءُوفٌ رَّحِيمٌ ﴿١١٧﴾ وَعَلَى الثَّلَاثَةِ الَّذِينَ خُلِّفُوا حَتَّىٰ إِذَا ضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمُ الْأَرْضُ بِمَا رَحُبَتْ وَضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمْ أَنفُسُهُمْ وَظَنُّوا أَن لَّا مَلْجَأَ مِنَ اللهِ إِلَّا إِلَيْهِ ثُمَّ تَابَ عَلَيْهِمْ لِيَتُوبُوا ۚ إِنَّ اللهَ هُوَ التَّوَّابُ الرَّحِيمُ ﴿١١٨﴾
😢
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such horrible crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
I really appreciate this video! I've had hard times answering these questions when being asked myself! I would like to get some references for the timeline: 16:28 as you haven't mentioned any sources for this. Please and thank you!
Salaam. Do you require sources for Lady Zahra being slapped? Or the statement by Allamah Amini?
@@Thaqlain the statement. Where does it say that? I'm asking solely so that I have a source to present when talking with the opposers. I believe whatever he said. Please and thank you
This statement is by Allamah Amini. And most probably in Al-Ghadir.
@Thaqlain Where do you think I can find it? Is Al-Ghadeer a book or are you talking about the event? If the event, it must be written in some books, right? Please let me know! Thank you.
Al-Ghadeer is the book. When it comes to books, al-Hujum 'ala bayt-i Fatima (a), written by 'Abd al-Zahra Mahdi has recorded over 250 references on the tragedies that Lady Zahra after Prophet's demise.
100th like!
Assalaamu Alaikum
The one Ameerul Momineen (AS) almost killed, What were his mother and grandmother famous for ?
One question: But why did the Sohaba in the first place, would want to Burn the house of Imam Ali Ibn Abi -Talib and be disrespectful to Syeda Faatima Salam Ulla Elahe.
For the fact that Imam Ali did not gave his allegiance to Imam Ali. And those in power knew the significance of Imam Ali in this matter. So the same reason sons of sahaba were able to slaughter the grandson of the Prophet in Karbala.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Sheikh can you please answer my one question im very confused and i read a lot of this from both sides(shia & sunni) about it...and i came to know that the the reference that you are giving kitab sulaym bis qais has a question mark on his authenticity and further and that it is also uncertain that he ever existed or not and then he gave book to aban ibn abi ayas......and also I read this also in this book that their is a tehreef done in the Qur'an so how can we trust on this person
And One more thing is that the only mam who were the witness on the Attack the door of Fatima (as)
Salaam Alaykum.
This should answer your concern.
th-cam.com/video/ayW9WOPTE40/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared
Can you please share the Sunni Refrences for the pledge Rasoolallah took from Imam Ali to be patient always.
Not everything mentioned by Imams of Ahlulbayt is mentioned in Sunni books. In fact, their authors deliberately left Ahlulbayt, as one can see that there is only one narration from Lady Fatima and four from Imam Hasan and Hussain in the top two Sunni books.
@@Thaqlain That is just the truth. But how else should I answer to those who are trying to defend the Gustaakh e Fatima (sa)? Please let me know some way which they can too find authentic.
The easiest way is the three proves found in their books:
1) The claim of the Lady part of the Prophet was denied
2) the 2nd caliph threatened her
3) She died angry with them
For any Sunni brother/sister with an iota of love for the Prophet, this should be enough to realise that her daughter was oppressed.
@@Thaqlain Jazak'Allah. May Allah be pleased with you.
I don’t understand one thing if Mola Ali was inside the house why he did allow Bibi Fatima to stay close near the door
Can Lady Fatima not answer the door of her own house?
Ali was protecting one door of the house, while Fatima (As) the other. Both protecting their children, Al Hassan and Al Hussein among them.
@@xlr8merch529 If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such horrible crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
@@xlr8merch529 grow up your following a group which has no link with prophet
@@xiontion9993grow up learn to research for the truth whatever it maybe!
Is it Mentioned in Book of Sulaym ibn Qais e Hilali
@Bahrom Olimov thanks, can we buy a physical copy of this book?
fairy tales ..no correct isnad
@Bahrom Olimov shia always use verses to justfy lies . you cant prove omer attacked fatimah .. this story is an insult to imam ali
@@mohamedali-pr9rl You'll have to start learning these ways. Firstly, we have our own methodologies of verifying hadith, we aren't solely chain worshippers like you. And even if we assumed the reports were all weak, the overwhelming evidence make this incident secure. In what way does this make Imam Ali عليه السلام look bad?
@@loverofahlulbayt7268 if you are not a chain worshipper then dont cry when we mention shia disrespectful hadiths againt ahl elbait ,,,and they are a lot ...what overwhelming evidence ??
so why do you think Al-hussein named one of his sons abu bakkar& umar??
Imam Hussein named all his sons as Ali and all his daughters as Fatima. It seems you are asking about Imam Ali naming his sons Umar and Uthman 🙂
@@Thaqlain oh! sorry.. but even why imam ali would name his sons umar and uthman as he hated them?
Regarding Umar, it was because Umar ordered him during his caliphate. Regarding Uthman, it was based on Imam Ali's love for Uthman ibn Madh'un.
Salam alaykum mawlana. Can you do a video about kitaab sulaym ibn qays and why some deem it as not trusted?
Alaykum Salaam. Already done :)
@@Thaqlain ok ok I'll search for it
*Either proof read subtitles to this video shown or do not use subtitles at all as words in subtitles do not correspond to words spoken*
The subtitles are auto-generated by TH-cam. Our team is working to improve them.
@@Thaqlain
As salam alaikum rahmatullahi wabarakatahu
*Thaqlain team*
I turn off subtitles when listening to your videos as
the power of your spoken English is excellent to understand.
Shias from iran how they know what happened in saudi Arabia
The same way Imam Bukhari was able to know while being from Uzbekistan and Imam Muslim was able to know while being from Iran.
May Allah Guide You To The Truth
May Allah keep us all on the path of those he has bestowed.
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.
But most importantly, Allah (ﷻ) told His Messenger (ﷴ ﷺ) in the Qur’an (33: 59-62) that if the Munafiqun or crooks in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah did not desist from annoying his wives, his daughters and other women, then He would permit him to kill them! So if Allah (ﷻ) knew that Abu Bakr, Umar & their daughters were Munafiqin who plotted to kill the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) or Sayyidah Fatimah az-Zahra’, then Allah would have warned him about it, and permitted him to kill them!
ٱَلۡـقُـرۡأٓنَ، سُـوۡرَةُ ٱلۡأَحۡـزَابِ:
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِّأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا ﴿٥٩﴾ ۞ لَّئِن لَّمْ يَنتَهِ الْمُنَافِقُونَ وَالَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ وَالْمُرْجِفُونَ فِي الْمَدِينَةِ لَنُغْرِيَنَّكَ بِهِمْ ثُمَّ لَا يُجَاوِرُونَكَ فِيهَا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا ﴿٦٠﴾ مَّلْعُونِينَ ۖ أَيْنَمَا ثُقِفُوا أُخِذُوا وَقُتِّلُوا تَقْتِيلًا ﴿٦١﴾ سُنَّةَ اللهِ فِي الَّذِينَ خَلَوْا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللهِ تَبْدِيلًا ﴿٦٢﴾
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
who is yabna sahaq?
Salaam. Can you share the minutes where he mentioned Yabna Sahaq. On the prima facie it seems the son of Sahaq.
salam, sure. 7:32
This is an interaction between Imam Ali and the 2nd caliph. Sayed has hinted why Imam Ali referred to him with this name.
@@Thaqlain right, thanks for that. i thought it was him.
Then why Ali (ral) married his daughter to Umar (ral)
Things that never happened :)
@@Thaqlain then who is Ummu kultham
Umm Kulthum was one of the daughters of Imam Ali. But her marriage with Umar is a fabricated story which has been thoroughly examined by scholars.
7 mins onwards lol. 1. Ali fights back by rubbing Umars nose into the ground so he does not follow the instruction of the Prophet not to react?
Companions turning their backs like the people of Musa? Do the companions committ shirk?
Will the answers change your opinion?
@@Thaqlain of course if upon sound rational evidence and not mere fantasy like statements
What defines sound rational evidence?
@@Thaqlainhe never answered😂
If you listen 10 different shia murabbi all of them tell different reaction (Story), why they don't talk about sanad
To the extent we know, all Shia scholars agree on this narration. We haven't seen any different version of it. Please share link to a scholar who has shared a different version.
@@Thaqlain give sanad who narrate this story
Will you accept a sanad from the School of Ahlulbayt? And we are waiting for your response that each Shia narrates a different version.
Then Ali (ra) proceeds to name one of his sons Umar... something doesnt add up
btw the narration used in this video is a false attribution to Sulaym ibn Qays, sounds more like a movie script than a narration lol
if ur reading this, please do independent research and try to approach this without any bias and you'll quickly realize the lies of the rawafidh
Based on various historical reports, Umar coerced Imam Ali during Umar's reign to name one of his sons after him. Else Sermon of Shakshakiya is there for the one who wishes to have a glimpse of reality.
And then Ali married his daughter to Omar ibn al Khattab knowing he was the murderer of Rasoolullah's (Saw) daughter? Is this a joke?
That story of Imam Ali marrying his daughter is a joke 🙂
@Thaqlain How can you just simply reject so many ahadith? Found not just in sunni but also Shia sources. In Al Kafi imam Jaffer acknowledged that marriage. Even Jaffar al Kulayni accepts this. Dozens other in sunni sources... Open your eyes (hearts)
There are tons of lectures online that explore this entire story and how it was fabricated just to present that caliphs were very close to each other. Else there is a Sahih hadith where Imam Ali said to Jafar at-Tayyar that our daughters are for our sons.
Step-daughter of Ali, daughter of Abu Bakr to the widow of Ja'far aT-TAYAR. After death of Abu Bakr, Ali married her. That step-daughter of Ali has same name with daughter of Ali to Fatimah.
@@arsitayyab2208 if the shias were truthfull remmember islam would not exist today because in quran ALLAH said that allah will give the chaliphate to the rightly guided and there was never a shia chaliphate,,,,,,there will never be a shia chaliphate because imam mahdis followers are mecca people
These all are lies.
Salaam. This might be new for you. But books of all Islamic schools have hints towards this event.
You can convince yourself but the truth doesn't change
honestly im a Shia of Muhammed w al Muhammed swt, and videos like this make me doubt the direction the "followers" of Ahlul bayt are going.
And where are they going?
I dont see a benefit to us, to sunni, or even non muslims when all we keep talking about is subjects of this nature where even our own shia question this situation, there are FAR more beneficial topics for our people than these hadith that we arent even sure are true because it simply doesn’t correlate with the character of our Imam A.s, we should be discussing things that make non muslims want to join islam, while we’re stuck on subjects of this nature and creating this sense of hatred for our brothers who may respect these individuals, THEY are busy reverting non muslims to the path of Islam. But you’ll probably just say something along the lines of, “recognizing the oppression of the Prophets swt family is apart of Islam” but the fact of the matter is, these analyses only confuse our already uncertain population of shia youth and even elders who hardly know a thing about assul el deen anymore.
Let's break down your concern into bullets:
1) There are far more beneficial topics: Strangely, Ahlulbayt have repeatedly asked us to remember and mourn the tragedies they faced. Thus, there can be "other beneficial" topics, too; belittling this is equivalent to criticising the teachings of Ahlulbayt. Also, check our 100 Days 100 Clips Series and Like A Garment. The "beneficial" topics are equally covered.
2) We should discuss things that can encourage Non-Muslims to join Islam: You have no idea how many non-Muslims accepted Islam after knowing about the tragedies of Lady Fatima and her children :)
3) Creating a sense of hatred: A question in this series answers your concern.
4) Confuse our youth: You have been the first to share this. We have a plethora of comments from Shia youth praising us for clearing doubts.
@@alidakhlallah5834 Go through this channel And you can find Maulana Talking about Prophet Muhammad saww biography without any hate.
@@user-nf9sz6cy7l no doubt, ive been subscribed to @thaqlain since their first Sayed Ammar infallibles series and before . But trajectory in our subjects has changed and my once impressionable mind isnt clouding my judgement anymore. So im questioning more
Great Job ; Keep dividing the "Ummah" by talking about the trivial issues. We are all humans and all (that means all) make mistakes with the exceptions of "Prophets" only. Only Allah will reveal the ultimate truth on day of judgement.
Sadly God has revealed the truth about certain individuals in the holy Quran.
Is there anything more trivial to the Ahlus Sunnah than knowing which of the Salaf were sincere and faithful and which ones were hypocrites or became apostates... I can't imagine how that might impact one's religion. I can't see any negative consequences from accepting misinformation about Allah and his Messenger.
Ummah divided?? 😂 It's been 1400 years. You are very late to the party
If that’s what it means to follow Ali and SAW then be it. Not giving in to pagan converts. No taqqiyya lanat to all 3 and their companions to have attacked the holy household
Burning the door of daughter of prophet is a trivial issue?
Great fictional writing
It is not always easy to accept knowledge different from what you have been told is the only truth. We pray for you 🙂
❤️🤲🏻
If Sunnis told you from their ahadith that the Prophet (ﷴ ﷺ) said that Prophets weren't inherited, then would you believe them?
If not, then don't be surprised if I say that I don't believe that Maulana Ali ibn Abu Talib would let such crimes happen to his wife, when he and his uncle, Hadrat Hamzah ibn Abdul-Muttalib, were given the titles "Asadullah" and "Haydar"!
ٱَللّٰهُمَّ صَـلِّ وَسَـلِّـمۡ وَبَـارِكۡ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا مُـحَـمَّـدٍ وَّعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا ﷴٍ، كَـمَـا صَـلَّـيۡـتَ وَسَـلَّـمۡـتَ وَبَـارَكۡـتَ عَـلَى سَـيِّـدُنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ وَعَـلَى أٓلِ سَـيِّـدِنَـا إِبۡـرَاهِـيۡـمَ، إِنَّـكَ حَـمِـيۡـدٌ مَّـجِـيۡـدٌ.