Gravity is often described in two different ways depending on the context: as a force and as an effect.In classical physics, following Newton's laws, gravity is considered a force. It's seen as an attractive force that acts between all masses. Newton's theory describes gravity as a pull between objects that depends on their masses and the distance between them.However, in the theory of general relativity introduced by Einstein, gravity is described not as a force but as a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. According to this view, what we perceive as the force of gravity is actually the effect of objects moving along the curved paths determined by this spacetime curvature.So, whether gravity is considered a force or an effect depends on the theoretical framework being used. In Newtonian physics, it's a force; in general relativity, it's an effect of spacetime curvature.
@@MystiQ1.0 both of them are wrong. It's plain to see that gravity is an effect. The resistance of the mass to being accelerated. Mass does not create acceleration. Its inert and has no force without acceleration. F=ma. Mass TIMES Acceleration equals Force. Newton's gravitational attraction is flat out wrong. This is clearly demonstrated by Galileo's ball drops from the Tower of Pisa. But flat earthers like Newton and Einstein dismissed it as a thought experiment because it didn't fit in with their flat earth view of the universe. The non-existence of gravitational attraction was later proven by Scott with a hammer and feather on the moon. When two objects of disproportionate mass fall at the same rate, there is no gravitational attraction. Furthermore, the laws of physics are equally applicable in ALL frames of reference. What happens you rotate the frame horizontally. The object now falls from the truck and impacts the trailing vehicle. Is that gravitational attraction or Acceleration? Your boy Einstein didn't understand basic physics which is why he concocted his Spacetime fantasy universe ruled by gravity in order to peddle his relativity nonsense. Mass doesn't curve space. Motion curves space. The earth rotating on its axis is the same physics as a merry-go-round rotating on its axis. The mass of the earth is being accelerated OUTWARD and FORWARD creating curved space. Explain how the mass of the earth is being pulled downward when its clearly being accelerated outward. The only thing Einstein got right was the properties of light. Even then he didn't understand that those very same properties made light am absolute reference marker in which to measure All other motion against. There is no Special Relativity when you have an absolute reference marker. There is no general relativity because gravity doesn't exist. I commend you for trying to obfuscate your flat earth physics by wrapping Newton's gravitational attraction and Einstein’s warped space nonsense around it. But people who understand actual physics, can properly analyze the experiments, can see right through the nonsense.
Hey I want to tell you I really appreciate you putting your comments out here I think it's very valuable to hear from you, I do want to let you know though I'm in no way shape or form a flat earther.
@@MystiQ1.0 by your video, you are very much a flat earther. Either take it down and redo it using actual science or be labeled a flat earther. F=ma. It's Mass TIMES Acceleration that creates a force. Mass by itself is not a force. E=mc. Mass comes from Acceleration. The conversation of atomic energy to radiant energy via Acceleration. The less acceleration the object has, the more mass it contains. Why does cold water have more mass than hot water? The proper frame of reference for an object is its acceleration factor. Since you are using mass as the frame of reference, you are indeed a flat earther. Someone who doesn't understand basic physics.
![The Incredible Story of the Milky Way [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDuZiimfSQU/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Incredible Story of the Milky Way [4K]](/img/tr.png)
Gravity is not a force. It's an effect. The resistance of the mass to being accelerated.
Down voted and reported as flat earth nonsense.
Gravity is often described in two different ways depending on the context: as a force and as an effect.In classical physics, following Newton's laws, gravity is considered a force. It's seen as an attractive force that acts between all masses. Newton's theory describes gravity as a pull between objects that depends on their masses and the distance between them.However, in the theory of general relativity introduced by Einstein, gravity is described not as a force but as a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. According to this view, what we perceive as the force of gravity is actually the effect of objects moving along the curved paths determined by this spacetime curvature.So, whether gravity is considered a force or an effect depends on the theoretical framework being used. In Newtonian physics, it's a force; in general relativity, it's an effect of spacetime curvature.
@@MystiQ1.0 both of them are wrong. It's plain to see that gravity is an effect. The resistance of the mass to being accelerated. Mass does not create acceleration. Its inert and has no force without acceleration. F=ma. Mass TIMES Acceleration equals Force. Newton's gravitational attraction is flat out wrong. This is clearly demonstrated by Galileo's ball drops from the Tower of Pisa. But flat earthers like Newton and Einstein dismissed it as a thought experiment because it didn't fit in with their flat earth view of the universe.
The non-existence of gravitational attraction was later proven by Scott with a hammer and feather on the moon. When two objects of disproportionate mass fall at the same rate, there is no gravitational attraction. Furthermore, the laws of physics are equally applicable in ALL frames of reference. What happens you rotate the frame horizontally. The object now falls from the truck and impacts the trailing vehicle. Is that gravitational attraction or Acceleration?
Your boy Einstein didn't understand basic physics which is why he concocted his Spacetime fantasy universe ruled by gravity in order to peddle his relativity nonsense.
Mass doesn't curve space. Motion curves space. The earth rotating on its axis is the same physics as a merry-go-round rotating on its axis. The mass of the earth is being accelerated OUTWARD and FORWARD creating curved space. Explain how the mass of the earth is being pulled downward when its clearly being accelerated outward.
The only thing Einstein got right was the properties of light. Even then he didn't understand that those very same properties made light am absolute reference marker in which to measure All other motion against. There is no Special Relativity when you have an absolute reference marker. There is no general relativity because gravity doesn't exist.
I commend you for trying to obfuscate your flat earth physics by wrapping Newton's gravitational attraction and Einstein’s warped space nonsense around it. But people who understand actual physics, can properly analyze the experiments, can see right through the nonsense.
Hey I want to tell you I really appreciate you putting your comments out here I think it's very valuable to hear from you, I do want to let you know though I'm in no way shape or form a flat earther.
@@MystiQ1.0 by your video, you are very much a flat earther. Either take it down and redo it using actual science or be labeled a flat earther.
F=ma. It's Mass TIMES Acceleration that creates a force. Mass by itself is not a force.
E=mc. Mass comes from Acceleration. The conversation of atomic energy to radiant energy via Acceleration. The less acceleration the object has, the more mass it contains. Why does cold water have more mass than hot water?
The proper frame of reference for an object is its acceleration factor. Since you are using mass as the frame of reference, you are indeed a flat earther. Someone who doesn't understand basic physics.