Sorry for your crash. Trying to be constructive so as to learn, in the video i heard you say you " i stalled it in". Just to be clear after watching and playing back crash a couple of times in slow motion would it be correct to say , you actually missed judged decent rate and never flared, it looked like plane was flying, you just flew it into ground thats why it bounced. Then after bounced plane ended up in extreme angle of attack and then quit flying and tumbled. Only save at bounce would be to full power and go around and hopefully regain flight control ?
@keepyourspeedup - Yep, he never flared and pancaked it. And that resulting bounce was so nose high I doubt he good have saved it by firewalling it and trying to do a go around. Anyway, it should be repairable since he can just 3D print whatever new parts he needs. :)
@@Jimbo-in-Thailand Actually, repairing 3d printed planes is a pain. After a crash like this most likely 80% needs to be re-printed. Almost a complete do over. Foam planes are much nicer in this regard.
@@adamtrzaskowski3901 It depends on the damage. His fuselage clearly broke in half and another piece flew off, maybe a wing tip. Since 3D printers (at least mine is) are so freakin' slow I would definitely try to salvage this model. Of course, that's assuming there's not a lot of other damage, cracks, etc., we can't see.
Flaring a model plane is an exeptional event, and doesn´t occur with all types of airplane. The trick of a good landing is actually easy to explain (probably not easy to achieve): come down in a quick descent, and keep it parallel to the ground, the closest possible; let the speed drop, until it touches the ground.
For those who care.... The crash occurred on 3 May and the plane was repaired and flying again on 7 May. www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?3473121-3D-Lab-Print-B25/page9 Watching the end of the flight in slow motion it's clear that I got too slow on final approach. At 6:15 you see the plane roll out of the turn onto runway heading, but in a slightly nose high attitude. At 6:18 the stall occurs and the nose starts to drop. At 6:19 I pulled full up elevator and added power, but it was too late. The plane impacts in a nearly level attitude but with a high rate of descent. After that all I could do was watch the inevitable.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | อาจารย์โอเล่ ญาณสัมผัส ผ่าดวงคนดัง ประเทศไทยจะเป็นยังไงหลังจากนี้!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gszT2O76fL4/mqdefault.jpg)
Sorry for your crash. Trying to be constructive so as to learn, in the video i heard you say you " i stalled it in".
Just to be clear after watching and playing back crash a couple of times in slow motion would it be correct to say , you actually missed judged decent rate and never flared, it looked like plane was flying, you just flew it into ground thats why it bounced. Then after bounced plane ended up in extreme angle of attack and then quit flying and tumbled. Only save at bounce would be to full power and go around and hopefully regain flight control ?
@keepyourspeedup - Yep, he never flared and pancaked it. And that resulting bounce was so nose high I doubt he good have saved it by firewalling it and trying to do a go around. Anyway, it should be repairable since he can just 3D print whatever new parts he needs. :)
Yep, totally agree with this assesment. The pilot misjudged the rate of decent and distance to the ground.
@@Jimbo-in-Thailand Actually, repairing 3d printed planes is a pain. After a crash like this most likely 80% needs to be re-printed. Almost a complete do over.
Foam planes are much nicer in this regard.
@@adamtrzaskowski3901 It depends on the damage. His fuselage clearly broke in half and another piece flew off, maybe a wing tip. Since 3D printers (at least mine is) are so freakin' slow I would definitely try to salvage this model. Of course, that's assuming there's not a lot of other damage, cracks, etc., we can't see.
Flaring a model plane is an exeptional event, and doesn´t occur with all types of airplane. The trick of a good landing is actually easy to explain (probably not easy to achieve): come down in a quick descent, and keep it parallel to the ground, the closest possible; let the speed drop, until it touches the ground.
Stall? More like you let it drop like a rock onto the ground.
For those who care.... The crash occurred on 3 May and the plane was repaired and flying again on 7 May. www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?3473121-3D-Lab-Print-B25/page9
Watching the end of the flight in slow motion it's clear that I got too slow on final approach. At 6:15 you see the plane roll out of the turn onto runway heading, but in a slightly nose high attitude. At 6:18 the stall occurs and the nose starts to drop. At 6:19 I pulled full up elevator and added power, but it was too late. The plane impacts in a nearly level attitude but with a high rate of descent. After that all I could do was watch the inevitable.
The pilot was correct he did stall it in. Low and slow coupled with a high wing loading and the result is obvious.
What a shame. Hopefully it can be repaired.
You took of the other way. Were you landing downwind?
There was almost no wind that day.
"Stalled it in"? Not sure.
High wing loading.
Ha ha POJ