ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Faster Than Light: New Dark Matter Findings Challenge Classical Physics
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ส.ค. 2024
- Dive into the world of tachyons, the elusive particles that might travel faster than light and hold the key to understanding dark matter and the universe's expansion. Join us as we explore groundbreaking research that challenges our deepest physics laws and hints at a universe far stranger than we ever imagined. Don't miss out on this thrilling cosmic journey!
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:39 Racing Beyond Light
03:26 The Tachyon Universe Model
05:57 Beyond Cosmology: Tachyons' Broader Impact
08:31 Outro
08:44 Enjoy
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook: / nasaspacenews
Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#tachyons #fasterthanlight #darkmatter #universesecrets #cosmicacceleration #theoreticalphysics #Einsteintheory #supernovae #spacemysteries #cosmology #particlephysics #lightspeed #universeexpansion #sciencebreakthroughs #physicsexplained #futuretechnologies #spaceexploration #cosmos #astrophysics #modernphysics #sciencerevolution #relativitytheory #speedoflight #spacetime #universetheory #quantumphysics #energyphysics #newscience #cosmicphenomena #physicsresearch
"We don't serve faster than light particles in here!"
A tachyon walks into a bar.
🤣🤣🤣 now that’s a good one lol
@DKonigsbach if they travel backward in time, could they be the trigger that set off the Big Bang?
And before you Serve them a drink it is already empty...
@@DKonigsbach when the tachyon walked into the bar did he say ouch?
It didn't walk in, it appeared and diapered in the bar billions of times per second.
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it - Terry Pratchett
To me, it doesn't make sense. Darkness is nothing, and light is something. What we call nothing is, in other words, the absence of something. But as scientists say, nothing doesn't exist; there is always something, even if we call it many things that imply nothing.
That's why it's associated with dark matter.
Fubar..."darknes" = absence of reflected light in the observable spectrum...if it is dark, there is a reflection, but yet has not arrived in the telescopes yet...why? Becaouse is dang dang far far away
@@user-wy7em9fm2c A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.... 😆
With the possible exception of brexit benefits
This video does a fantastic job of making a highly complex topic understandable and intriguing. The potential implications of tachyons for both cosmology and practical technologies are mind-blowing. One suggestion would be to include a segment addressing common misconceptions or criticisms of the tachyon model to balance the discussion and address potential skepticisms. Great job on bringing such an advanced topic to a wider audience!
Edit: Expanded Theory on Minuscule Particles Escaping Black Holes
Firstly, it's crucial to understand that the jets observed emanating from black holes are produced by material in the accretion disks surrounding them. These disks form as material spirals towards the black hole, where extreme forces and friction generate immense amounts of energy in the form of radiation.
My theory explores what could be happening inside black holes, particularly beyond the event horizon. I propose that when matter is absorbed by a black hole, it compresses to a point where it reaches a fundamental limit. At this critical point, the matter might transform into extremely tiny particles that interact with ordinary matter in unconventional ways.
These minuscule particles could potentially escape the black hole, possibly in a form we haven't yet detected, traveling through the universe akin to "dark" matter. One might question how particles can escape a black hole when nothing can evade its gravitational pull. My idea hinges on quantum mechanics, where particles can sometimes "tunnel" through barriers they cannot traverse conventionally. This quantum phenomenon might enable these particles to escape the event horizon, behaving differently from larger particles or light.
While my theory is speculative, it draws inspiration from experiments in particle physics, where we push the boundaries of understanding matter and energy. Detecting these tiny particles could prove challenging, as they may not interact with light or matter in typical ways. However, their gravitational effects might offer a clue and could potentially be detected with advanced instruments.
I hope this theory sparks curiosity and prompts further discussion. It's a concept that requires exploration and feedback from a wide range of perspectives, not just theoretical physicists.
Thank you for your interest and input.
@@trexmtb4381 Very interesting theory!
But black holes have jets and doesn't consume all that falls in.
This faster than light is part of the MIT coverup of infinity where they have to defraud the expansion rates
Dark matter is matter and antimatter it cannot be anything else we’ve known it since the 70s
@@tdw5933 When a black hole has jets, it's because it is consuming more material than it can handle, and the jets form at the edge of the event horizon. This doesn't mean that the black hole creates these particles out of nothing, And the particle I'm talking about is when it's inside the black hole, not when it's consuming.
Now that is a thought
Why did the tachyon go to therapy?
To resolve issues it had with its future.
A tachy joke... ;)
No need for tachyons or room for them in real physics. FTL happens in the proper frame in a particle accelerator. It appears in our coordinate frame as a particle beam stretching the value along the spectrum. When your proper speed is c, your experience of time becomes redshift.
Dark matter is kinetic energy affecting the focus of a pressure hypersurface subject to Pascal’s law. Changes are simultaneous across the surface. It doesn’t break classical physics. It’s just a matter of understand the applied science better.
Same with dark energy versus a Hamiltonian necessitated by distribution under Huygens principle. The original energy reference isn’t lost, but the depth of field increases losing focus. Hubble used the setting on his telescope to compute distance by this.
Lemaitre distorted it to apply his theory that works for a galaxy to the universe. Pay real close attention to the math. Not only does it not measure motion, there’s a pattern of confirmation bias ignoring tons of evidence against the expansion myth.
Unfortunately you will waste your life if you follow any but the applied science here. That’s the science that provides technology. It answers these questions, but you really need to focus in Relativity and QM as a matter of perspective. It always corresponds to empirical reality.
time dilation/redshift =/= ftl. That's like saying logarithms are exponents. They're not.
Expansion myth? There's observational evidence for expansion. What evidence is there against it?
@@Jamex07 you need to study the math of SR and how particle accelerators work.
Read the evidence more closely. Look at the math. Evidence against? Try ALL of applied physics. Deep fields confirming the uncontested cosmological principle. Understanding galactic development to see ancient lenticular galaxies are tens of billions of years old. Were they created as ancient? Don’t catch a problem with that? The first law of thermodynamics. Energy is not created or destroyed only transformed.
The third law of equilibrium where light waves cancel in spherical wavefronts forming the background radiation. It shows an ancient pattern of galaxies in CMB (ref Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation). How light works (e.g. Euler’s solution to the d’Alembertian). Huygens principle. A Hamiltonian. Understanding how the Hubble constant works versus comoving variables that can’t be isolated the way Lemaitre pretends they are.
Bose-Einstein statistics contract the field opposite to Dirac-Fermi and proportionally by Boltzmann. Friedman Equations also go three ways.
FYI Weinberg’s First Three Minutes is what’s wrong with it. He didn’t believe it for a minute and kept looking because you NEVER SUSPEND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.
History also provides ample evidence. Lemaitre distorted Hubble’s law to make his VALID theory that works in galactic development apply to an ETERNAL and CONSERVED universe. Applied physics has no issue explaining ALL of the so-called mysteries of cosmology if you take the time to learn it right from an SR and QM perspective.
@@Jamex07 I retired from academia. Don't be fooled by me running a rescue. I still write physics and math books.
You need to learn the math of SR, and how that applies in a particle accelerator. Have you ever heard of Cherenkov radiation? It's fluctuations of the field that are faster than the light passing through the medium. The light passes through in a proper perspective while the observation of the fluctuation is in a coordinate perspective. A particle beam unfolds at c, and the information differentiating the particles red shifts along the spectrum as it simplifies with further acceleration. This is how these things work.
Yes, it's a myth created by a priest to apply his VALID solution for a stage of a galactic process we can prove to an eternal and conserved universe. It's not hard to spot when you understand the math and read the scientific reports instead of the popular media versions. The real science always identifies its exact procedures. When part of your procedure is contracting the field to account for big bang, you just created a system of confirmation bias.
I listed evidence in my comment. There's tons of it, like Bose-Einstein statistics where the field contracts opposite to the Fermi-Dirac statistic that balances into the Boltzmann statistic.
Deep Fields. Any of them show galaxies of all stages of development consistent with the uncontested cosmological principle and the first law of Thermodynamics. More ancient galaxies are seen in background radiation studied as Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations.
Do you understand it takes 250 million years for our solar system to orbit the Milky Way? Can you comprehend that galaxies that far from the alleged big bang couldn't exist let alone lenticular galaxies that have to be tens of billions of years old?
Hubble's constant was used with the depth of the field to measure distance. It had nothing to do with motion and he knew it. He contested Lemaitre's butchering of his math to his grave. You can't isolate comoving variables that way.
I can go on all day listing evidence and going into painful detail showing you the math is wrong. My book Quantum Theory of Time isn't about this at all, but it covers all the science needed to see what is wrong with Big Bang. Weinberg's book was also a statement of what's wrong with big bang. He kept looking to his grave.
The answer is to run away from popular media science and stick to the applied science. You can't expect astronomers to be experts at the applied science. I'm not an expert at their job. If you understand applied physics from a modern QM-SR perspective, it all comes together quite nicely. Of course you need a few decades actually submersed in this field, not just being a tourist to work it all out.
@@akademesanctuary1361 Cherenkov radiation does not travel faster than light. It travels faster than light in a medium. I took optics, I know how to calculate a material's refractive index. Cherenkov radiation DOES NOT travel faster than light.
How can you claim to write physics papers when you don't know this basic fact? I'm not buying your posturing. You're failing to demonstrate your views.
"Do you understand it takes 250 million years for our solar system to orbit the Milky Way?"
Yes.
"Can you comprehend that galaxies that far from the alleged big bang couldn't exist "
Wrong. The big bang happened at all points in the universe. Those points are moving away from each other. We are not "that far" from the "alleged" big bang.
60% of this is just ranting and posturing.
In your book, The Quantum Theory of Time, how do you define a quanta of time? Otherwise, how is time quantum?
@@akademesanctuary1361 so then the universe is not expanding like a balloon?
The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
Does that mean that those
Does that mean those 6 galaxies don’t have black holes at the center?
@@josephstaggs6201 Yes, most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote-
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) it does seem subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation. He is known to have repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.
What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened.
@@josephstaggs6201 Yes, General Relativity predicts dilation wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.
What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. Dilation is the original and correct explanation. Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened.
@@josephstaggs6201General Relativity predicts dilation wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote -
"The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.
What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. Dilation is the original and correct explanation.
Singularities were popularized by television and movies beginning in the 1960's. There was clarity in astronomy before this happened.
Watching the effects that gravity has is like watching the effects of the wind has on other objects. The gravitational lenzing is like having a magnifying glass in space actually a bunch of them. That’s how it looks to me.
That's a really good way to explain it to non-scientists. We don't see the thing, but we see the effects of the thing. It's also rather poetic. Nice comment.
@@PrometheusZandski thank you.
So far, dark matter isn't even agreed upon as to what it is beyond "unseen mass" that allegedly makes up most of existence. It's Been established that no particles can travel faster than light if following conventional physics. However, as a fan of the scientific laws that make our reality make sense, this should never be discussed by anyone Normal. This should be at most a topic that a extremely small percentage of people theorize. I mean, like maybe 10 to 100 people, out of the alleged 9 billion people on this planet. Arguably at maximum only 10 Should even take interest, with 1 or 2 trying to study this concept.
Einstein never stated that nothing can travel faster than light, he said nothing can ACCELERATE faster than light in a vacuum. So particles that always travel faster than light does not invalidate Einstein.
Patato potato, tomato tomoto
@@martinwilliams9866 yes it can. See my post at the top.
Huh, I was not aware of that detail. That is significant.
Nothing, except the light itself...
☝️🥸
What does accelerating faster than light actually mean? Light doesn't accelerate does it? Doesn't it have a constant inherent speed?
The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion.
Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton.
Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles.
*TH-cam presentation of above arguments: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html
*More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
*Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1
Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
Einstein's theory of relativity does not say that nothing can go faster than light. It says that it is impossible to accelerate a particle that is moving slower than light to a velocity that is larger than the velocity of light, and the other way around.
This is such a seductive idea and the language of this presentation favours the existence of these particles even though it also states that there is no empirical evidence for their existence and it also postulates extraordinary possibilities should they be found.
Unfortunately, the mysteries remaining in cosmology have plenty of great minds probing the potential solutions to these questions, many of which suggest require the reassessment of fundamental principles.
Imagining the way things could be if we just took away one or two of the rules. Perhaps we should be looking for new rules beyond what we already know rather than trying to stretch or avoid barriers presented by existing knowledge.
@@andycordy5190 you know they used to say photons have no mass but now they say it has a little. If there is something that you can’t see how do you prove it’s there? You can show how it effects the surroundings if it does.
To understand the concept of tachyon and origin of the universe and meaning of life and Essence of Existence in the language of modern science especially relativity and quantum mechanics in simple mathematics coupled with intuition, refer the book:
SPACETIME AND THAT BEYOND
By A.N.Unnikrishnan.
I realize these videos are for the plebs who will never investigate but could you also include any relevant scientific papers on the subjects going forward?
At light speed time becomes relative. If they can at light speed with by definition is speed of energy itself witch by definition is speed of time. Anything moving at speed of time against the flow of time would be traveling as fare back in times as time is moving forward
In my opinion, I don't believe that anything can go backwards in time. I think that what we call time is the effect of particles changing from one form to another, in other words, decay. This effect changes when there is more or less particle density. Where there is more gravity, there are more particles, and when there are more particles, it takes longer for them to go through their processes because they have to contend with the processes of other particles or materials, if you want to look at it that way. But these are just my ideas.
Fun tachyon fact: in 1994, Leon Lederman came to visit my university. One of our professors, Dr. Torsten Alvager, had an experiment set up to look for tachyons. We were FORBIDDEN to mention it to Lederman. 😂 Obviously, Alvager never found any tachyons.
I'm not an expert in this topics but as I see it - we have a lot to discover - if not the most - and that is facinating 😊 SB.
We've known this for a good bit. Glad to see the video.
Does this theory posit one more particle in the standard model or a whole new set of particles that mirror the existing standard model, all of which exhibit this interesting property of only being able to travel faster than c?
It was a well produced bunch of nonsense that people who don't know better might believe.
How can there be new dark matter findings when dark matter doesn’t exist?
Its a word for something that can tell have an affect of reality but cant see it physically
there. Thats it.
Over the past five years, we do not know how much of the following material has fallen into the hands of others through hidden camera filming of the KBS Human Theater by the Korea Broadcasting Corporation. This was initially known to residents as one woman's lovesickness, but was in essence a ghostwriting thesis. In fact, in February of the following year. The thesis was published on the Internet, and I was able to check several more after that. And the Ministry of National Security Planning's Manhattan Solution is an impersonation of President Moon Jae-in. For example, what happened in Sikdori, Muan-gun is something that I cannot understand as a human being. I suffered from paralysis on the right side due to stomach bleeding and suffered torticollis. Even though there was a person who was a part-time agent of the National Intelligence Service in the food hall, they only watched it through a hidden camera, and no action was taken. The next day, with the help of the public health center, he was transferred to a university hospital and treated for a cerebral infarction and surgery for gastric duodenal cancer. The cerebral infarction did not occur much longer. They said that if it weren't for this, the aftereffects would have been much better than this. In short, a thesis ghostwriter followed them around. Residents and passers-by are saying that KAIST University, Seoul National University, and Harvard University in the U.S. were involved. Then, an accurate investigation is needed. The scientific knowledge I acquired in high school is that outer space is made up of atoms, is a completely dielectric material balance space, and the law of conservation of mass is the basic law. Nothing happens, such as gravity, big bang, background radiation, expansion, etc., and it moves with atomic magnetic force. This is dark energy. Matter with a magnetic field. When it rotates, heat is generated due to internal pressure, causing phenomena such as lava on the Earth, prominence of the sun, corona, solar wind, and sunspots. The sun is burning due to the confinement of the magnetic field, and if it is not burning, it becomes a black hole. The center of the black hole is a dark matter such as metamaterial. There is no explosion, but when it explodes, it flies towards the polar regions. And if you look at the many traces of meteorite impacts on the Moon and Mars, it is the difference in magnetic fields. When it does its job, it pushes the meteorite away, but when it reverses, it leads to a collision. The meteorite that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs The collision occurred due to a change in the axis of rotation of the magnetic field. In the evolution of plants and animals, the evolution of animals shows the beginning of egg cell evolution. The evolution of animals is determined by the difference between the animal pole and the vegetal pole. Dinosaur eggs are shown to be exposed, which leads to hair growth. Eggs can hatch, but none of the restored dinosaurs had hair. Human evolution did not begin with apes, but evolved from a unique entity called humanity, and the high intelligence of placentals is a characteristic of placentals, making them the best species on Earth. It shows an example of establishing itself as a predator. The nutritional status of mankind has improved with the Green Revolution. And cannibalism and incestuous marriage have been practiced even in modern times, and these results show that people lived with genetic diseases and it is a mistake to judge evolution only from remains. Gray hair stress. Melanin Hydrogen peroxide This is the main cause of gray hair, but it is caused by immunity and enzymes. However, human medicine only knows the cause, not the process and result. It cannot describe how immunity and enzymes occur. Stress is also used in rats through gas and electrical stimulation. If stress is applied, all descendants will inherit it. Plants carry out photosynthesis, and most of the nutrients are distributed to the soil. If the ARF7 material in the roots is removed, moisture cannot be detected. However, human scientific knowledge does not know what the cause is. It is a chemical reaction and a substance. Answer cannot be described The spin of quantum mechanics is affected by electromagnetic waves, and in superposition and entanglement, the entanglement is antimatter and the electric charge can be calculated. An example of seeing particle and wave nature at the same time is the blue glowing phenomenon of the fuel control rod. Western quantum mechanics is based on uncertainty. It is not the invisible quantum mechanics like the principle, but the quantum mechanics that is visible starting from the eight trigrams of Eastern philosophy, where the non-pole is taegeuk and the taegeuk is the non-pole. It shows the microscopic quantum mechanics and the macroscopic atomic magnetic force. A quantum computer must know the elements and principles. General A computer can also produce the effect of a quantum computer. Not only this, but the best explosive made by humans is the atomic bomb. In the past, atomic bombs used uranium as the main raw material, but in modern times, only the detonator is uranium and the main raw material is hydrogen. This is a uranium gas bomb with a grenade. Argon gas is uranium gas. If you add two types of gas here, it shows a unique reaction. It reacts until the hydrogen is used up, which means it is extinct. Even after more than 100 years since the theory of superconductivity, neither the physical properties nor the concept are known. The orbital is 0. And the electrical resistance is 0. The material that accepts this is uranium salt. And why does it only act on direct current and why does the BTS theory not fit? There are three phenomena such as this uranium salt and the photoelectric effect. What is it? Plasma superconductor uranium salt The inner core of the Earth The lava magnetic field has the same phenomenon, the answer is the same, but the logic is different, but it is not explained. The national defense of a country depends on the aircraft carrier. The largest proportion of this aircraft carrier is the catapult, and there are many problems with either the steam type or the electronic type. The methods that can be used at the lowest cost are the explosive type and the hydraulic type. However, the hydraulic type can be used in parallel with the steam type. And the technology of the propeller is not shown. The reason is that you can know the sound wave just by looking at the propeller. However, this sound wave can also be reduced by reducing the jaw resistance. This is why bee venom, which treats human pain, is a polymerase enzyme, and the combination and ingredients affect the disease. What is the principle of doing so, and what is the similarity between poisonous mushrooms and poisonous mushrooms? And human scientific knowledge does not know if a superconductor is nearby and does not know if it is using atomic magnetic force. With 20,000 dollars being spent to send 1 kilogram into space, the space age has begun. is a story from the future. However, with the logic of superconductors and atomic magnetic force, it is possible to create a dish-shaped flying object. In other words, it is the space age.
Particles don’t need to go faster than light to go back in time. Feynman diagrams show they could travel back in time as they are.
@@callejondorado would they travel with a beam of light like fibre optics work to send information.
The expanding stars in space were born from zillions of expanding dark matter particles / densifications that are constantly pushed out of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies.
Expanding galaxies were formed from the center outwards in the early days of the rapidly expanding visible universe in space when two expanding supermassive objects moved close to each other.
The separate expanding condensations of dark matter pushed through each other again and again and it caused them to expand so fast that they didn’t have time to push each other away from each other as fast as they were expanding.
At this point, they began to coalesce into new expanding stars quickly without a pulling force and without the ever-curving space.
I predict that with the help of the James Webb telescope, it will be discovered that the stars were born as if from nothing. But of course not out of nowhere, you know.
At least it has already seen that galaxies were born very quickly in the early days of the visible universe. This supports my view of how galaxies formed!
That is, massive and ready-made galaxies are observed in the very young visible universe.
Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were created in their own 3D Big Bangs on the same principle.
Nowadays, the so-called background radiation is the expanding light that was created when these expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies were born in their own 3D big bangs quite far from each other.
Over the ages, the expanding background radiations have shaped each other into equal quality as they have encountered each other, interacted and accelerated each other’s expansion and at the same time speeded up in the same proportion as matter and light have expanded in space outward into the already existing space.
Expanding galaxies are large particles that convey information about an object that is quite massive and dense because it emits energy that has the character of galaxies.
Of course, we cannot detect the object in question that we are moving away from.
Galaxies are particles that convey information about it.
There are an infinite number of similar objects in the infinite 3D space and they would always recycle the existing energy / pushing force.
Millions of billions of years of scattered energy are pushing towards them at an extremely fast speed into space.
The energy/pushing force pushed to the center of the objects in question is once again compressed there into extremely dense energy. In other words, there is constantly extreme pressure in the centers of these objects, which does not decrease because more energy is pushed into the center all the time, where it is compressed into extremely dense energy.
The energy pushed into the center displaces the energy that was previously pushed there, and thus it is pushed away from there, and the expansion of the sector enables the dispersion / expansion of this extremely dense energy into a less dense one.
Pushing away from the center of that object into this extremely dense energy absorbs energy that is being pushed towards the center of this extremely dense and massive object.
In other words, only a small part can reach the centers of such extremely massive and dense objects.
That is, extremely fast energy is pushed towards these extremely dense and massive objects, the speed of which has slowed down as this energy has been pushed through more new quarks expanding in space.
In the context of pushing through new expanding quarks, this extremely fast energy has accelerated the expansion / dispersion of the energy in the expanding quarks in space into a larger and larger region of space.
It is also absorbed into the expanding quarks according to when its speed has slowed down so much that the expanding quarks could stop it.
#Google #Savorinen #science #cosmology #physics #theoryofeverything #read #how #theworld #works #八
The Time Paradox issue always crops up whenever faster than light travel is proposed.
My issue with the time paradox, is that it presupposes that history exists. For that to be the case then time has to travel backwards also. Time, unlike dimensional space is actually a man-made construct, developed purely for our convenience. History is just our representation of what once was relative to where we are now. Time like history, is also something that once was, ie it only exists in our memory or on paper once gone, it's physicality ceases to be also.
Therefore there can be no paradox or time travel, there xan only be a movement through dimensionality, ie the movement from one location to another. The rate of transfer using time is just an observational construct that mankind uses to relate to a "when" and is nothing to do with the "where"
So then when in history or future is irrelevant in a spatial framework and only relevant in a human framework.
Therefore in a spatial universe, time travel is non existent as history has passed and future is yet to happen, therefore we can not interact with it, hence no possibility of time paradoxes, we can be at one location or another location. The governing factor is the distance.
As an example. At one point our ability to travel was at the pace of walking. You could not walk to the moon as you would have ceased to live as the distance to cover would take longer than your life span (exclude environmental factors). Today, we can do that journey, not cause we live longer, but cause we can travel faster.
The same still applies today, we can only get as far as our lifespan allows, Yes we can go further and further as our technology increases our travel speed, but an individual can go no longer than their lifespan.
So whether at sub light speed, light speed or faster than light speed, the maximum distance we can travel as an individual is a measure of our lifespan not how fast we travel, as although we talk about time dilation, that is a relative mathematical observation of two bodies in separation. For two bodies on the same ship will experience the same duration of time, each limited by their lifespan, and not limited by the relative lifespan of the body on earth.
So no chance of time travel, paradox or cause/effect or effect/cause scenarios, as there is only the now, as history is a memory of time past and future is memory yet to come, neither which exist outside of our a man-made construct of time.
“Dark energy… matters! (from The Bad Luck Tree)
Would the existence of tachyeons mean that the theory (yes, still only a theory) of relativity need to be rewritten, swapping the speed of light squared for the speed of tachyeons squared: E=Mt2? Thus not permitting time/events to unfold backwards... everything would still have to progress in a linear fashion.
Novel Dark Matter Hypothesis
Dark Matter is simply unaccounted for gravity. GR states that gravity is the consequence of the curvature of spacetime. Is it possible that the structure of spacetime itself could be warped without the presence of matter? Spacetime has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independently of mass, and all have been proven with observations from gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves! Fabrics can also be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of causing a deformation and losing its elastic nature. All of these conditions were extreme during inflation, so it is plausible that the “fabric” of spacetime analog could extend having its elastic property have hit a yield point leaving pockets of inelastic spacetime geodesic that cause gravity without the presence of matter?
Therefore, if gravity is strictly the consequence of the warped of spacetime, and fabrics can be permanently overstretched, then those empty warped geodesics would create gravitational wells independent of mass. My hypothesis of DM is subatomic black hole imprints of the quantum fluctuations that popped in at the moment of inflation. The CMB shows where the hot dense regions were they created the galaxies. They would have been the initial cause and location of the warping. These imprints would be clouds of quantum sized floating fixed geodesics, so they couldn’t expand or evaporate. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect. GR wouldn’t require modification because DM would just be an extension of how spacetime behaves at extreme conditions. No MOND, no WIMPs, and no parallel universes, just empty spacetime deformations that produce gravitational wells to help jump start galaxy accretion processes. Zwicky may have named is Missing Mass correctly since he detected some gravity without mass present
I thought that Einstein didn't say something couldn't travel faster than light but that it could not accelerate up to and beyond that speed.
Is it possible that tachyons are responsible for the forward flow of time? If they run counter to the speed of light then they are effectively moving backward in time, aren't they? So by creating a counter-force, are they creating the forward arrow or passage of time?
As a physics professor, i would guess that there are no limits in the Universe.
Start with the spacetime constants, other natural proportions, the first law closing the universe to a finite quantity of perpetual changes, and energy state transformations. The boundary conditions will eventually come to you. You could also just look up how each part of the spectrum is created and distributes to see how it cancels in the middle. If you still don't see the boundaries, hang up your hat in physics and start writing fantasy.
@@akademesanctuary1361 It is ignorant to impose boundary conditions on the Creator.
What about the condensation of tachyons which couples them and makes them to form bradyond eventually?
What about electrons how can you be in two places at once? When that indicate they're moving fast of the light also.
Tachyons exist on higher dimensions/planes, so would not create causal loops or time paradox'. Also, the Graviton is a tachyon (originating from the highest dimension, proportionally distributed throughout the lower dimensions, which explains our low gravity)!
Of course things can move faster than light because the universe itself expands faster than light. Mathematically you cannot do so but creating equations to prove something isn’t always hyper realistic with the universe around. We make math problems, the universe doesn’t. So we will always be limited by our math
What I can never understand is when something is traveling as fast or as
What I cannot understand is how something can travel as fast as the speed of light or even close to the speed of light will not run into particles that will obliterated anything especially a human body. Getting from one point to the other at enormous distances at close to if not at the speed of light will not run into particles. That would be all it would take to obliterate a rocket ship or a human body.
Does a tachyon particle also have a boson partner? I would find that plausible because it would then take stars faster than light to the far reaches of the universe as it expands into infinity. It is then not the star that moves, but the tachyon field. Suppose the edge of the expanding universe is two-dimensional without gravity. Gravity occupies it due to an approaching attracting mass. Then the surface of the boundary falls into infinity, dragging the celestial bodies with it via the tachyon field, causing it to move faster and faster because gravity attacks an increasingly larger boundary. It's just an argument, a proposition. I hope to take physicists down one of the more possible paths of possibility.
Cool! That would be fascinating.
I always think, no matter what the process is, that at some point it will stop expanding, and start to contract. Then expansion again, and so on.
If this turns out to be true...I can't count the number of things this would rewrite!
This is amazing, if these theories are true, or proven this opens up so many new additions to scientific research.
Fascinating captain! These are the voyages of the starship intercourse, frosting its way on another penetrating mission! exclamation point😂
Let me know when you ACTUALLY figure something out.
I would be highly skeptical of such arXiv preprints. They are not peer-reviewed literature. The authors use observations from one galaxy, and neglect motion in their arguments against relativity, whereas the relative motion in general relativity is responsible for "dark matter" and "dark energy." Areas of space we haven't measured and/or calculated accurately. One commentor mentioned pascal's law as it is applied in astrophysics , where radiation or gravitational pressure on one point is evenly distributed on a gas or plasma. Pascal's law is not often initialized properly due to Huygens-Fresnel approximations from the Hubble space telescope, which are inaccurate at focus, which many authors don't recognize.
Wouldn't tachions have beyond infinite energy from our frame of reference? How would you harvest such energy???
If a photon, which is massless, yet has momentum is limited by the speed of light, then tachyons must have negative mass, which allows superluminal speeds and must therefore infringe on the dark matter conversation. Except the negative mass would generate negative gravity, which doesn't fit the galaxy rotation model. Still, something interesting to look into.
...we live in a simulation...the more we dig, the more "crazy things appear" !! You guys need 2 watch 1899 mini series
It was canned for a reason. It was bad.
And does this hypothesis purport that tachyons interact with the normal matter?
Travel faster than light, relative to what? If light travels towards light then does the light on one side travel at twice the speed of light relative to the light coming from the other side?
I've always believed that if you travel faster than the speed of light, by definition, you're moving backwards in time. Hence particles before impact at CERN rushing towards the impact site from a forward time perspective.
When 'some-thing' travels faster than the information about it..
- it can possibly loop around and around, taking you for a confusing spin and not being able to prove anything about it.
Quantum mechanics is one way of trying to describe this phenomenon imho.
If Tachyons are not interacting with any matter including photons how is it they exert kinetic energy on matter to fuel the expansion of the universe🤔 this model has some interesting ideas but also seems to contradict itself. I have a hypothesis on the expansion of the universe that is most likely un testable cosmic voids and the cosmic highways that push and pull galaxies either together or apart and I believe that there is a density issue! With a large degree in differences in either dark matter or dark energy! Perhaps this is like light moving through different mediums and changing the speed of light such as water or more commonly gravity. Our own galaxy as far as I understand sits in the middle of a cosmic void. Cosmic voids are not entirely empty but they do have a far less amount of matter. So would it not be logical to at least postulate that this also would have an effect on the actual speed of light🤔. We know that gravitational lensing will bend the path of light and that the straightest line between two point is always the fastest so we can definitely say when photons have to move around large gravitational forces such as stars galaxies or black holes they are obviously slower due to the obstacles they encounter along the way! This doesn't break any laws in Einsteins theory of relativity but it does point out that light has both a maximum and minimum speed when dealing with matter its interacting with! Now to bring this back to the expansion of the universe it could be that density is the key to amount of either dark energy or dark matter and both of these in turn would have an effect on the speed of light as well as hubbles constant. Which is currently the best but not entirely accurate accurate model for judging distance at the edge of the known universe if I understand the current issues the the James Webb telescope is bringing to light with our current models of inflation are concerned around Planck time and the Big Bang models are concerned. Now as to where Tachyons are concerned Perhaps the dont lead to paradox and again just a hypothesis that we may merely have found something that travels faster than light and they themselves do not break locality or causality and that the arrow of time is still only able to move in one direction🤔 as much as I would love to see an actual time machine😃 that being said Perhaps Tachyon are the key to faster than light communication and quamtum computers using entangled particles are not as feasible for this purpose as we all hoped! Although I will say that I do believe that quantum entangled computers may be something to consider as we slowly build a base on the moon and begin to not only colonize planets in our own solar system! The next logical step before we can travel to the stars in my opinion. We are still a very long way from such goals despite what Elon Musk thinks is feasible with our current level of technology and society.
Boogie man is faster than light too , and methinks far more believable than tachyons.
the discovery of gravitational waves is more promising. We know that gravitational waves exist. If we could harness and create our own gravitational waves in some kind of a wave engine. Then we would merely have to keep continually pulsing waves behind our ship and ride through space back a surfboard it's similar to what warp engines are to produce. Warp engines require some exotic material to create. gravitational waves do not!. If it could be created and then manipulated like a Harrier but in all 6 directions. Space travel could become very feasible. And I would doubt if there is a Lightspeed limit if you're riding on a wave. You technically would not be moving space would be moving
Nature does not accept our human limited understanding as nature's limit, so two elements at opposite speed of light, dark mater and make it possible that at relative speed, the speed is not limited understanding of Einstein. If those elements cross and feel each other, speed of gravity can be at light speed or higher, therefore C is only limit in our observable universe. An element above C belongs to another universe.
Humanity tries to understand what we observe and explain it in the best way we can. It is possible that we will find that all our theories are incorrect, but they were useful for later understanding things better.
Or maybe it's simple, in a vacuum you go at high speeds, and in our solar system the speed is equal, in other higher ones it's different!
So much for TIME, a variable used as a standard to describe other stuff.
As per the truth, any physical body cannot run at near or 100% light speed... maintaining its original physical existence. It should turn to photons to gain light speed. So a human body or machine transport at light speed or greater than light speed is technically a great hiccup in the present scenario. Maybe a warm hole theory can prove to be the future Interstellar transit access!!
Of course, that is the kind of thing or force that holds the whole multiverse together. This is beyond our own universe and how we are anchored to it. Something beyond. We already accept that the Big Bang is not what everyone was convinced of but something that is or rather happened but the how and why and does it fit our system’s for measuring interactions of things or phenomena in relativity to each other. This gives us a base upon which all other observations can be properly evaluated. So for us time is not only of the essence but is our species most basic primordial root of our own self awareness. This as said before is beyond anyone’s possible voluntary interaction yet is part of every single or amalgamation of these particles and forces that positively everything is relying on to actually exist in the only universe we can interact with. So far. By being able to confirm the existence of these particles that clearly don’t fit cosily with our present models of the universe that we can all agree on. This is a monumental movement to the universal understanding of the how why when where that we have been asking ourselves maybe since we were only a lowly yet special amalgamation of primordial DNA carriers. Well maybe not everyone but let’s hope the ones to influences the direction our species should be heading. Can’t wait for that to actually happen instead of what seems to motivate the hopefully if not a failed evolutionary existence into choosing to live in this or that way. Instead of a possible contribution to the advancement if not the most basic survival of not only our species but the systems that allowed us to get to this point in time of our common if not universal march through time. Mind glowingly fascinating.
I don't know about there being an infinite number of multiverse but I've always subscribed to the idea of a mirror Universe. This is more in line with the dualistic state of the Universe eg. matter and antimatter. and superpositining.
I speculate that the physical universe ruled by general relativity operates from within a seperate dimension to that of the subatomic ruled by quantum mechanics. One being the hardware and the other the software operating in unison to run the program.
If an approximate solution is found by claiming one alternative is less wrong than another, it would lead to speculation that the real answer may lie in a third untested hypothesis.
Dark matter and dark energy control all the matters Speed in the universe
Beautiful video.
so when yall going to make a tachyon engine
0:59 wait just a moment, you left out a crucial detail, you said the theory of general relativity posits nothing can surpass the speed of light and you mean to say nothing with a positive mass can do that, because that’s the critical ingredient in the formula. Aside from that it’s very interesting i love the channel
I have to watch this video. No one has found dark matter yet so how can they be new findings and how can it challenge anything?
Radiation is the problem with faster than light speed.
Hi! Please check new findings done by team led by Andrzej Dragan, regarding tachyons.
Great video !
Why are we trying to impress or even convince the science community? 6:08 they're their own committed community. It'll slow us down
Faster than light, other than photons, new exciting times if exists.
But for structure formation its essential that the possible dark matter candidates are non relativistic and cold correct
Impressive thinking and theorising but I think a little more explanation of what you consider Tacheons are is required. Why were they postulated? Where would they have been generated? Why are they called tacheons. BTW they must be true because Captain Picard from the Enterprise often refers to them!
I find it somewhat deceptive to have NASA in your name if you aren't associated with NASA. Don't they object ?
Wormholes linking area's of gravity eve. Less then a nanosecond .long enough to alter paths of gravitational body but much change in light going through explains what we see linked to dark matter
I think dark matter is any particle other than protons, neutrons and electrons. Higg's boazons might be some of the particles in dark matter.
I think Picard called them Cronometric particles. Much better name. Follow the Captain
Why cant tacos travel faster than light for super fast dinner delivery?
Why?
So tachyons suddenly no longer introduce non-resolvable anomolies and infinities?
How is a ground breaking concept if the conept exists since 1923? The name to this theoretical particle was given in 1967 but still all papers revolve around the theory.
Provided tachyons can solve the hubble constant. This isn't a new theory, its an old one. Also, the kinetic energy of tachyons is not what causes repulsion. Their imaginary masses are. That's what a tachyon is. A particle with imaginary mass.
Getting rid of Dark energy, by using yet another name, Tachyons... why the two different names? are these not simply new proposed/supposed properties for the same phenomenon?
OH SHIT, I'M FEELING IT!
Still no sources of what you are talking about in the description. I'm blocking you now.
Faster than light tachyon does not spin ➖ 1
There is no method to measure anything that travels faster than light. We barely have the tools to measure light to begin with.
@@cinemaipswich4636 Yes you can. See my post at the top.
First thing we make it that tachyon stuff is a weapon.
Type 1a supernova's use as a standard candle gets thrown out the window the moment two extremely heavy white dwarfs merge.
I highly doubt this work will match more recent observations from current telescopes.
Intriguing video, thank you, but no particle can accelerate beyond the speed of light. We are always looking back in time when we measure light years, even the photons of light from the sun are eight minutes old when they reach us here, on planet earth. To exceed the speed of light, that would be where time stops. Where time stops, nothing is observed, or detected, because it’s outside of the fabric of space-time, and therefore out of existence. Since we have some observable evidence which suggests that Dark Matter exists in the Universe, whatever it is, it must eventually be detectable, because it is in the fabric of space-time.
scientific narcissism!
Haven't tachyons already been observed to not travel faster than light?
Lets all calm down and breath in a paper bag before we throw the foundations of our universe away! To explain something that is totally unknown with something that is totally unlikely seems a
sad move from NASA.
There is no faster than light properties.it’s only a change in the rate of causation depending on the amount of gravity.
I find no NASA Space News associated with NASA.
Wow, not only do they break the light barrier, but they also don't interact with matter or light. This is just stupid. ]
Star Trek has predicted the future again
The theoretical concept of Tachyons comes from way bedore Star Trek. Nothing new here.
Tachyon move faster as they lose energy.
Dr ECG Sudarsan invented it
So the AI voice is saying what you interpret from the article.....iam disappointed
Seen ones particals in sky colied make dark cloud after little thinds particals spinnin in that dark cloud after a bigger lookin cluster formed and the cloud moved and back and gone
Play at 1.25x
This is theoretical click bait. All theoretical challenging ideas are still theoretical. Words like potentially, theoretical, and ideas, are not evidence or proof of faster than light particals. When it can be replicated by individual peers, then it becomes solid testable results.
The correct spelling is boson.