This ending made perfect sense. To save the land the Duttons sold it to the reservation so greedy ass corporations can never ruin it. Kayce was the bridge between the Duttons and Broken Rock tribe Reservation cause his wife and son are native. The Duttons have always liked the Broken Rock Tribe for helping them since 1883. In the end they still remained friends and become closer because of Kayce and Monica falling in love and bridging the two families. Taylor Sheridan shows how people from two different worlds despite their history of hostility can still become allies and friends and help each other back and forth.
Based on this $1.25 per acre, and Beth later saying the Reservation paid them $1.1 million, the Yellowstone Ranch is 880,000 acres. Kayce said East Camp is 5,000 acres, so he kept less than 0.6% of the Ranch. And $1.25 in 1883 is worth $39.05 today, so if you adjust Kayce's offer for inflation, it would be $34.36 million for the whole ranch. Which the Reservation could afford, so I'm surprised Beth didn't suggest offering them that.
What would the sales tax be for $34.36 million? Because it was my understanding that the sales tax was the big obstacle to selling, along with making sure their debts got paid.
No. This is assuming that the land is commerically worth, on today's real estate market, 39.05 plus inflation an acre.... it's not. We know that because just a year or two ago Market Equities offered John Dutton 500 million dollars for his ranch. That's what its worth, bare minimum. I assume you are saying they should've gotten 35 mill in this deal, with the spirit of the 1.25 idea but with modern money? The whole deal is symbolic. Either the tribe buys it back for what it was "stolen" for or the entire thing is pointless. Also, adding forever caveats of East Camp and never developing it also impact the value of the deal. The idea that Kasey would make them this offer, then pull out a calculator and start talking about inflation and interest is a joke. Also, I kind of doubt the Res could easily just eat 35 million like that... sure they've got the casino, but those don't make as much as you'd think they do. Especially in less populated states.
I Think the price was symbolic and a giant F U to everyone who wanted the ranch for greed and exploitation. It also represented that thing stay unchanged over the centuries to come, people are transient, the land is forever.
@@KS-xk2soMarket Equities didn’t offer him $500 million dollars for the entire 880,000 acres but for 10,000 acres. The 10,000 acres was in between 2 pastures meaning the airport would be a peninsula. Dutton ranch would border it on 3 sides.
Show me where in America you’re buying land for under $40 an acre. You can throw “adjusted for inflation” out the window. Not all commodities rise in alignment with inflation
The aim is to destroy dynastic wealth and return it to the people. Without inheritance taxes, the wealthy accumulate ever more wealth to themselves, and thus more power, until a handful of people own everything. This is wisdom three thousand years old. You CANNOT leave wealth concentrated and passed on, or you destroy society and leave money in the hands of those who have never earned it. Inheritance taxes don't affect anyone in the middle class, the exclusions are too high, and moderate wealth isn't taxed. If you have a million dollars or less, you're fine and free. But what happens if you don't have it is all the land is eventually owned by very few, who concentrated their wealth and can buy out and control everyone else. That destroys any notion of upward mobility and splits society like an axe between the rich and poor. The killer here is the valuation of the land, which has been run up by outsiders. If it wasn't so valuable, this would not be a problem. This is virgin, pristine land, so you don't see the danger of it, and why the core argument is to keep it that way. Now consider if this land was all bordering New York City, and actually contained homes and buildings and businesses, and how much money and power that represents. I'm perfectly fine with inheritance taxes destroying the wealth of billionaires. That is exactly what it is designed to do. His solution to keep the land intact shows that he values the land more than the money, and he made the sacrifice for it. He could have walked away with dynastic wealth and chose not to do so, but the land survives. Bravo.
Taylor Sheridan wrote yellowstone into the ground after he lost a pissing contest with Costner. Sheridan got butthurt, and took it out on the viewers by writing a pisspoor ending to a GREAT show.
The ending itself wasn't necessarily bad of how the ranch went back to the broken rock tribe the problem is is that the whole last season feels rushed like season 8 of game of thrones there could have been the same ending but done more gradually instead of just a eureka moment oh let's just sell it for pennies on the dollar what conveniently giving rip and bitchie Beth an excuse to have to leave Montana and set up a spin-off show somewhere else
He said that the ending was going to be the same regardless of what happened with Costner. The Indians getting the land back WAS the ending. And let's be honest, Yellowstone was run into the ground In season 4. Sheridan's attention has been divided between all of his shows for a while now. And Yellowstone has suffered in particular. It's been almost unwatchable for the majority of two seasons, filled with nonsense and padding. Given that, the fact that he was able to wrap it up reasonably well even WITH the Costner drama is impressive. But as far as I'm concerned, this is the end of the story. I don't think it needs any other spin-offs. I don't care about what happens to Beth and Rip or the 6666 ranch or whatever else. The biggest casualty of the unnecessary fight with Costner was the franchise itself.... Right at the height of its popularity.
The Duttons protected the land, imagine if John Dutton back in 1883 had not settled and claimed it....likely the government would of sold it piece meal to a hundred or more ranchers and the natives would have been screwed out of it forever.....
I just found a huge plothole in the show. John, Spencer and James come across the Indian chief looking to inter his elder. Spencer is about six. John is about 10. That leaves a question as to how did James die the first year if he’s still alive five years later to run into that chief. Taylor Sheridan made a huge mistake there.
I mean, that what happens when the lead actor leaves the project before completion. I’m not surprised if Sheridan had to do a quick rewrite to compensate
This ending made perfect sense. To save the land the Duttons sold it to the reservation so greedy ass corporations can never ruin it. Kayce was the bridge between the Duttons and Broken Rock tribe Reservation cause his wife and son are native. The Duttons have always liked the Broken Rock Tribe for helping them since 1883. In the end they still remained friends and become closer because of Kayce and Monica falling in love and bridging the two families. Taylor Sheridan shows how people from two different worlds despite their history of hostility can still become allies and friends and help each other back and forth.
I love Rainwater’s “are you for real?” expression 😅
I kid you not this scene had me in tears!
Love it
What a great solution!
The finale brought everything full circle.
1883 pretty much told us the end.
Which was obvious, but everyone's theory was that Tate will take it since he's native. I'm glad they went this route instead
The protrelle of Thomas Rainwater and his driver was done with pride respect and most of authenticity!
portrayal
Based on this $1.25 per acre, and Beth later saying the Reservation paid them $1.1 million, the Yellowstone Ranch is 880,000 acres.
Kayce said East Camp is 5,000 acres, so he kept less than 0.6% of the Ranch.
And $1.25 in 1883 is worth $39.05 today, so if you adjust Kayce's offer for inflation, it would be $34.36 million for the whole ranch.
Which the Reservation could afford, so I'm surprised Beth didn't suggest offering them that.
What would the sales tax be for $34.36 million? Because it was my understanding that the sales tax was the big obstacle to selling, along with making sure their debts got paid.
No. This is assuming that the land is commerically worth, on today's real estate market, 39.05 plus inflation an acre.... it's not. We know that because just a year or two ago Market Equities offered John Dutton 500 million dollars for his ranch. That's what its worth, bare minimum. I assume you are saying they should've gotten 35 mill in this deal, with the spirit of the 1.25 idea but with modern money?
The whole deal is symbolic. Either the tribe buys it back for what it was "stolen" for or the entire thing is pointless. Also, adding forever caveats of East Camp and never developing it also impact the value of the deal. The idea that Kasey would make them this offer, then pull out a calculator and start talking about inflation and interest is a joke.
Also, I kind of doubt the Res could easily just eat 35 million like that... sure they've got the casino, but those don't make as much as you'd think they do. Especially in less populated states.
I Think the price was symbolic and a giant F U to everyone who wanted the ranch for greed and exploitation. It also represented that thing stay unchanged over the centuries to come, people are transient, the land is forever.
@@KS-xk2soMarket Equities didn’t offer him $500 million dollars for the entire 880,000 acres but for 10,000 acres. The 10,000 acres was in between 2 pastures meaning the airport would be a peninsula. Dutton ranch would border it on 3 sides.
Show me where in America you’re buying land for under $40 an acre. You can throw “adjusted for inflation” out the window. Not all commodities rise in alignment with inflation
Easily one of the best scenes that made Yellowstone worth watching.
Inheritance taxes are BS. Why should a family member have to pay something on taxes that is already in the family?
because the government hates competition
Then it's your land and still pay annual land tax to the county
Legal theft from government
The aim is to destroy dynastic wealth and return it to the people. Without inheritance taxes, the wealthy accumulate ever more wealth to themselves, and thus more power, until a handful of people own everything. This is wisdom three thousand years old. You CANNOT leave wealth concentrated and passed on, or you destroy society and leave money in the hands of those who have never earned it.
Inheritance taxes don't affect anyone in the middle class, the exclusions are too high, and moderate wealth isn't taxed. If you have a million dollars or less, you're fine and free.
But what happens if you don't have it is all the land is eventually owned by very few, who concentrated their wealth and can buy out and control everyone else. That destroys any notion of upward mobility and splits society like an axe between the rich and poor.
The killer here is the valuation of the land, which has been run up by outsiders. If it wasn't so valuable, this would not be a problem. This is virgin, pristine land, so you don't see the danger of it, and why the core argument is to keep it that way. Now consider if this land was all bordering New York City, and actually contained homes and buildings and businesses, and how much money and power that represents.
I'm perfectly fine with inheritance taxes destroying the wealth of billionaires. That is exactly what it is designed to do. His solution to keep the land intact shows that he values the land more than the money, and he made the sacrifice for it. He could have walked away with dynastic wealth and chose not to do so, but the land survives. Bravo.
So we can support the elites
Inheritance tax is a scam
Most taxes are.
As part of the deal, Rainwater and Mo need to come over for Christmas 😊
Definitely!!
your music addition does not improve this clip .
Whaaaaawhaaaaa baby
@@devindenault4255 hes right
Maybe not, but at least we can hear the dialogue
Agreed, but I think he does it to avoid copyright
@devindenault4255 your mocking a constructive comment on a clip you stole and profit from pretty much shows your character
Kayce is and always was the best character on Yellowstone. The others were so badly compromised as to become bad guys.
of course theres cringe tiktok music over this
Well yeah who doesn’t do that?
Should have played the whole scene
I posted the part 2 if you would like to watch!
Taylor Sheridan wrote yellowstone into the ground after he lost a pissing contest with Costner. Sheridan got butthurt, and took it out on the viewers by writing a pisspoor ending to a GREAT show.
If you have watched 1883, this ending makes total sense, and was always gonna be
Too many shows...he had his hand in too many pots!! Of course quality goes down!!
Uh-huh. You're just mad the "white man" didn't win. Get over it boy
The ending itself wasn't necessarily bad of how the ranch went back to the broken rock tribe the problem is is that the whole last season feels rushed like season 8 of game of thrones there could have been the same ending but done more gradually instead of just a eureka moment oh let's just sell it for pennies on the dollar what conveniently giving rip and bitchie Beth an excuse to have to leave Montana and set up a spin-off show somewhere else
He said that the ending was going to be the same regardless of what happened with Costner. The Indians getting the land back WAS the ending. And let's be honest, Yellowstone was run into the ground In season 4. Sheridan's attention has been divided between all of his shows for a while now. And Yellowstone has suffered in particular. It's been almost unwatchable for the majority of two seasons, filled with nonsense and padding. Given that, the fact that he was able to wrap it up reasonably well even WITH the Costner drama is impressive.
But as far as I'm concerned, this is the end of the story. I don't think it needs any other spin-offs. I don't care about what happens to Beth and Rip or the 6666 ranch or whatever else. The biggest casualty of the unnecessary fight with Costner was the franchise itself.... Right at the height of its popularity.
The Duttons protected the land, imagine if John Dutton back in 1883 had not settled and claimed it....likely the government would of sold it piece meal to a hundred or more ranchers and the natives would have been screwed out of it forever.....
Is this clip filmed while you are watching on you tv? 🤔
Yes
Where did the techno music come from? Rainwater definitely would not approve! lol
Rainwater was the one playing it lol
Why do people add the dumb ass music and ruin the clip??
Really good question I’m not sure why I did it. Maybe it’s John’s ghost playing it
I knew it.
Be a lot better than the Chinese owning it like they do mostly now. Ask Sheridan about it lol
I just found a huge plothole in the show. John, Spencer and James come across the Indian chief looking to inter his elder. Spencer is about six. John is about 10. That leaves a question as to how did James die the first year if he’s still alive five years later to run into that chief. Taylor Sheridan made a huge mistake there.
So how many acres is Yellowstone.
💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
Terrible final season. Sheridan's ego ruined this show.
Completely agree but he did good with landman
Sell off the helicopters from Season1?
Can't stand the ending.
It sucked.
Waited two years for a total cop out.
Completely agree with you!
Show blows !!
First season was really good. Landman is much better
@ oh I agree .. no John to much Beth .. I’m out
Monica was a poorly developed charactor
Worst character on the show in my opinion
Crap music ruined the video
Oh well sorry
It's actually a dog shit ending. Made me hate the series
agreed. It was complete ass
I mean, that what happens when the lead actor leaves the project before completion. I’m not surprised if Sheridan had to do a quick rewrite to compensate
Dogshit only because the privilaged white family didn't end up with the land
If you watched 1883 it makes sense.