Optimizing space itself with WeWork's Adam Neumann | Disrupt NY 2017

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
  • WeWork's Adam Neumann talks with Connie Loizos about building operating systems for buildings, selling services, and building partnerships.
    Subscribe to TechCrunch today: bit.ly/18J0X2e
    TechCrunch Disrupt is the world’s leading authority in debuting revolutionary startups, introducing game-changing technologies and discussing what’s top of mind for the tech industry’s key innovators.
    Watch more from Disrupt NY day one here: • Disrupt NY 2017 | Day ...
    TechCrunch is a leading technology media property, dedicated to obsessively profiling startups, reviewing new Internet products, and breaking tech news.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 454

  • @rayneduttine
    @rayneduttine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +360

    This is like watching a slow motion train wreck.

    • @ASJacob
      @ASJacob 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chuk chuk, chuk chuk, chuuuuu, chuk chuk, chuk chuk, boooom! 😂

  • @youknowitzg00d
    @youknowitzg00d 4 ปีที่แล้ว +367

    This didn't age well.....like if watching 2019
    Edit: This got even worse in March 2020. Thanks for the likes!

    • @gj8822
      @gj8822 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Talking about sustainability in the business

    • @p00pie
      @p00pie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ur gay

    • @livprimitive
      @livprimitive 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      2020

    • @BobTheBob647
      @BobTheBob647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Look even worse now.

    • @Jordan-Ramses
      @Jordan-Ramses 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Haha, it's even worse now. At least they can blame Corona now for their already inevitable bankruptcy.

  • @Skb2005
    @Skb2005 4 ปีที่แล้ว +436

    Are you profitable? “We can choose when we become profitable” yaaaaaaa OK

    • @khold1983
      @khold1983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      What a fraud...

    • @sivakrishnat5471
      @sivakrishnat5471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      lol

    • @alponselrik
      @alponselrik 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      well.... technically he already gain enough profit...
      not so much for the company lol

    • @freedomfest2741
      @freedomfest2741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@alponselrik in other words he robbed his company of all it's money.

    • @PlayerMathinson
      @PlayerMathinson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@freedomfest2741 I don't really think resent is anywhere on his mind. He has earned more money than he will ever be able to spend. He is like a scam artist who has made it, which is even more depressing.

  • @ChucksAstrophotography
    @ChucksAstrophotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    Him and Elizabeth Holmes would make a great couple, LOLOLOL

    • @huzcer
      @huzcer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      His wife seems to be a similar control freak narcissist already.

    • @mvrdara
      @mvrdara 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This is epic startup fell(which is natural) theranos was scam

    • @YoosufMuneer
      @YoosufMuneer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He's better than Elizabeth Holmes because he's still worth hundreds of millions.

    • @mvrdara
      @mvrdara 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@YoosufMuneer and he is not behind bars

    • @unknownchannel3141
      @unknownchannel3141 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed.

  • @huzcer
    @huzcer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    "You work, I get rich, there is no we"

    • @jenkins80526
      @jenkins80526 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It couldn't be said any better than that LO!!

    • @freedomfest2741
      @freedomfest2741 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He got the name wework because it stands for, my wife and I, wework to scam this company out of every penny.

    • @jenkins80526
      @jenkins80526 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@freedomfest2741 LOL!

    • @todoldtrafford
      @todoldtrafford 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Scam investors, but yea

  • @eriangelino7800
    @eriangelino7800 4 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Business should have three parameters:
    1. Profitability
    2. Long term growth
    3. Stable, experienced, and mature leadership;
    Otherwise, it is a 🎈.

  • @kaan54800
    @kaan54800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Watched "WeCrashed". Landed here..
    He has talent when it comes to talking in front of the audience.

  • @adrianhibert3029
    @adrianhibert3029 5 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    The bluff business model

    • @alexcipriani6003
      @alexcipriani6003 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adrian Hibert why is that?

    • @alberoDiSpazio
      @alberoDiSpazio 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the business of business. Speaking of which my local library rents out rooms for $3 an hour.

  • @wjun0131
    @wjun0131 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Basically a property manager???

  • @Christian-we6kz
    @Christian-we6kz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Which idiots ever thought WeWork was a tech company?

    • @naughtyUphillboy
      @naughtyUphillboy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nearly every investor...............

    • @Shreendg
      @Shreendg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SoftBank.

    • @YoutubSUCKZ
      @YoutubSUCKZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      softbank. who else?

  • @felixf4378
    @felixf4378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    4:47 "Are you profitable?"
    "We are in a high growth stage of our business, and we don't see that stopping anytime soon."
    No BS translation: "We are not profitable, and I don't know when we will be profitable."

  • @dynamicdave2647
    @dynamicdave2647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    actually i think it was a very good concept- making work more dynamic and communal while in theory saving you costs. It was just badly managed.

    • @lavs8696
      @lavs8696 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      To be fair it wasn’t much different from other venture backed companies like Uber. They pursued market share at the expense of profits on purpose. Unfortunately, they ran out of funding and had to go public which opened them up for ridicule.

    • @dynamicdave2647
      @dynamicdave2647 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lavs8696 I agree. They badly mismanaged themselves, but dont you agree that it was technically a good business concept? I give them credit for that.

    • @lavs8696
      @lavs8696 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dynamicdave2647 well they weren't the first, they just had the highest capital. its incredibly competitive and capital intensive to achieve market share in that space. they basically undercut their competition to run them out of business in order to monopolize the market, bleeding cash in the process. This isn't unfamiliar with other VC backed companies, they were basically no different than Uber.

    • @dynamicdave2647
      @dynamicdave2647 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lavs8696 yes, but their business concept was that we can utilize office space better than most landlords.. and can make the office atmosphere more appealing and fun, all while making your membership/rent cheaper. That is a good concept. They just mismanaged themselves..

    • @lavs8696
      @lavs8696 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dynamicdave2647 they were far from the only ones who did that. every major city was littered with coworking spaces going as far back as 08/09

  • @thevapelounge6987
    @thevapelounge6987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    I have to give this guy credit for turning decent hair and an accent (and a LOOOOT of bullshit) into a billion dollar net worth

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Neumann’s like Holmes & the Russian girl, Sorokin, using the same weasel words: innovate, curate space, create narratives for service, disrupt social culture, strategically analyse, initiate change, manifest & be a life student, empower people for a vision….edit: it’s like stabbing my ears with knives.

  • @basitk12
    @basitk12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Charisma my ass. His thick accent, doesn’t even have a bachelors degree and on top I hear anxiety in his voice. Anyone who invested deserved what they got. Good.

    • @chrisginoc
      @chrisginoc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He was a Salesman. His job was to pitch to investors. It worked at first, but then stories started leaking out about just lack of leadership and drug usage. Plenty of extremely successful entrepreneurs who barely finished high school.

    • @basitk12
      @basitk12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chris G get off his balls son. Hes a con artist. Plenty of drop outs at McDonalds too.

    • @chrisginoc
      @chrisginoc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@basitk12 Get off who?! I don't like the guy. What are you talking about? Con artist, salesman, etc. Call it what you wanna call it

  • @travissmith1397
    @travissmith1397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    This is what a con man sounds like, rattling off BS numbers.

    • @MrRadBee
      @MrRadBee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Today's headlines prove his Con worked afterall.... $1.7 Billion balloon

  • @jamespharris2494
    @jamespharris2494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Wow. We can chose when to be profitable! Never heard that b4.

  • @davidmcnamara2103
    @davidmcnamara2103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    0:10 - ''there is a lot of confusion over WeWork'' - only accurate thing in this whole video.

  • @slovokia
    @slovokia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    How does a company with 40% margins lose 1.9 billion dollars on 1.8 billion of revenue? Someones math isn’t adding up. Maybe he should have been interviewed by someone with an accounting degree instead of an english major.

    • @jajajinks1569
      @jajajinks1569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Because he scammed investors by funneling WeWork's money into his own pockets.
      He got WeWork to buy land from his OWN real-estate company at higher prices, he started businesses lead by his family members using WeWork's revenue, and he bought jets, houses, etc using investors' money.
      It's surprising he wasn't arrested or something.

    • @Jordan-Ramses
      @Jordan-Ramses 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They are losing money because they're growing the business. If they grew on profits it would grow very very slowly. It's not a good business. 40% margins aren't great when you're taking on those kind of long term risks. If short term leases were so profitable the building owners would do it themselves.

    • @kelvinnguyen6048
      @kelvinnguyen6048 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol

  • @challway5767
    @challway5767 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    "Do you want to rent overpriced office space through a middle man?!"
    No. No I do not.

    • @pawelallable
      @pawelallable 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      $500 for a personal office is not a bad deal.

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pawelallable until you lose it because the contracts signed by those from whom you rent are void. Or if you adopt the lifestyle of drinking & carousing with people not in your business in order to make “connections.” Work from home instead. Cheaper, truer, easier. Not always -but a lot of the time compared with paying a landlord for a shoddy contract when in-house counsel exists for themselves.

    • @pawelallable
      @pawelallable 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cindytartt4048 even IF they ended your month to month contract on a location you did zero tenant improvement in, would that really be a HUGE problem? If we're talking about rare events anyway, you could have the same thing happen to your home unless you own it. I've known people that had to move because the house they were renting sold. $500 for a nice office is fair and no point in worrying about doomsday bs. If you go too far down that rabbit hole you won't even be able to do any business deals of any kind anyway because there are way bigger risks in those.

  • @kylebroussard5952
    @kylebroussard5952 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The way he dips and dodges around the simple question, "how should your company be valued?" is absolutely alarming.

  • @neptuneninja
    @neptuneninja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    We Work is only the abbreviated title. The full name is "We Work the stupid investors, banks, renters and anyone dump enough to hand us money". Awesome hip startup to invest in and lose all your money.

  • @CJCtelevisionnetwork
    @CJCtelevisionnetwork 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Update: This sociopath just made off with 185 million in consulting fees after almost bankrupting the company.

    • @mirsondCA
      @mirsondCA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He must worked hard than u 😎😉 thanks

    • @MrTeeri4
      @MrTeeri4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mirsondCA actually apparently they are suing him or it and have declined to pay him that amount

  • @evanday1104
    @evanday1104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Wait... he said a third of the space is open community space. Then followed with 90% is personal office space. What am i not understanding here?

    • @f1dog
      @f1dog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      hahaha. Listen to this bullshit. This guy is such a fraud, its almost hilarious. "Are you profitable?" "So...Um we are focusing on hyper growth at the moment." Absolutely no direct answers. What I feel bad for is the 5000 employees that are being laid off and the dumb ass landlords who paid the tenant improvement to get them in their buildings. F Softbank. Most of their money was from Saudi Arabia and Japan. lol

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think you’ll find that instead of just “disrupting” Work culture Adam wanted to disrupt fractions, percentages & arithmetic. And Euclidean geometry…😁

    • @JanKosowski
      @JanKosowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's simple: the first statement refers to cubic meters, the second to square meters.

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JanKosowski how do the percentages change?

    • @JanKosowski
      @JanKosowski 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cindytartt4048 It was a joke, but lobby is often much higher so it could work.

  • @aurkom
    @aurkom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Lot's of people watching this in 2019.

  • @milarovas4363
    @milarovas4363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    He's an expert charlatan.

    • @DarkSideChess
      @DarkSideChess 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      He's definitely good at what he does

    • @basitk12
      @basitk12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thick accent, drop out. Didn’t even have the discipline to complete bachelors and you would think he would create an empire.

    • @pitdog75
      @pitdog75 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Uri Geller of business.

    • @ihavelegs
      @ihavelegs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂

    • @huzcer
      @huzcer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pitdog75 of the same persuasion certainly

  • @apb1604
    @apb1604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "We like to set an example for other companies" , well that's an understatement!

  • @joezawinulreviewsandreacti2509
    @joezawinulreviewsandreacti2509 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    he has a pretty good answer for everything I don't think the company is valued fairly but I can see how people bought into it because he does have a vision and he can present things well

  • @khunopie9159
    @khunopie9159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Can't wait for the subsidiary: _WeFail_

  • @nukezat
    @nukezat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I look at this and I wonder how after the Theranos fiasco, investors fell for this guy's overly articulated perfect pitch

    • @ajsky1066
      @ajsky1066 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Guess it goes to show that you don't need people skills or brains to become a wealthy VC. Jack Ma is an example

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ajsky1066 exactly, Hack Ma. Fu€£ me. 😁😉

  • @finbarrmcgrath1686
    @finbarrmcgrath1686 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s like being in college……for ever….what could possibly go wrong?????……oh it already did….

  • @anamikeith0
    @anamikeith0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Mute the audio and watch his change in body language when she starts talking numbers at 4:22.

    • @mikecantreed
      @mikecantreed 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It didn't change at all

  • @OthelloPanda
    @OthelloPanda 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    16:13 "That's the type of company that we're going to be." he says as he forms an actual pyramid with his hands...

    • @AbGupta
      @AbGupta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Simon March hahahahahahaha

    • @donblassvivar
      @donblassvivar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      wework was basically a pyramid scheme. it needed to attract new 'members' all the time to stay in business, just like a scam.

    • @julesfalcone
      @julesfalcone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simon: Very observant.

  • @dhettema
    @dhettema 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Fun to read the comments from 2 years ago :)

  • @PrometheusHR
    @PrometheusHR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    The company should be called U-work, while I get paid!

    • @mr.snipersheku3656
      @mr.snipersheku3656 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually u are not the only one who works there many people work at one place soo its wework

    • @kennethsouthard6042
      @kennethsouthard6042 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And boy did he ever get paid!

  • @MrDarknesstolight
    @MrDarknesstolight 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    We had a business in NZ that was just like WeWork. It has has since gone bankrupt. Like WeWork, they did not own their spaces, they were nothing more than sub-letters.

  • @wayne8797
    @wayne8797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    He is a very good speaker and comes across as very intelligent. Too bad he used his skills for the wrong purposes.

  • @Abbieabma
    @Abbieabma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Still funny that wework got positioned as a tech company 😂

  • @amlivinginhell
    @amlivinginhell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why would the interviewer doubt wework as a technology company?

  • @joshuajackett6371
    @joshuajackett6371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now that we know what we know, he really avoids questions that matter.

  • @moviesjean23
    @moviesjean23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Still waiting for WE WORK new iOS to be released

  • @BenRangel
    @BenRangel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    It's not a bad idea in itself.
    They just didn't have a profitable business plan - and became overvalued.

  • @orangewarm1
    @orangewarm1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why is it tech? Got to admit, the guy is a sales genius.

  • @jakeschmell
    @jakeschmell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    8:50
    They have an “operating system”.
    🙄 oh really...

  • @TheMamspoker
    @TheMamspoker 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    4:50 translated "no" we are not profitable. People are getting very nervous about this IPO because WeWork is bleeding money ("by choice" lol).

    • @TheMamspoker
      @TheMamspoker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Daniel Washford I was right of course. www.wsj.com/articles/wework-faces-cash-needs-as-botched-ipo-scuttles-planned-infusion-11569846537?mod=hp_lead_pos1

    • @Eric345
      @Eric345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Daniel Washford All profit? Lol In a recession they go bankrupt.

  • @ironhide9955
    @ironhide9955 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "should you be valued as a real-estate company or a technology company" - why is that a question? its a renting company which people have been doing for decades.

  • @e.w.3989
    @e.w.3989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    They should rent out server space like what go daddy does. They should also have freelance programmers to help with early start up hurdles that new entrepreneurs might have. They can be a full fledged technology services company and they have the resources to do so.

  • @lutherburbank8323
    @lutherburbank8323 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    He took the cottage marijuana rental industry that existed during the medical prop 215 era, where growers paid off property owners mortgage in exchange for having a landlord that let then do what they needed and wanted, while property managers made a huge cut in the middle and had guaranteed rent every month and could charge a premium, i would bet money he got the idea from this and was even invloved in this type of “business”

    • @jasondorian3780
      @jasondorian3780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is the most underrated comment and the more u think about it the more I think you're absolutely correct. Considering WeWorks other cofounder, Miguel, went to University of Oregon, in one of the weed friendliest cities in the US at the time, I can guarantee you he was familiar with this concept from his days in Eugene and I wouldn't be surprised at all to learn this entire concept was actually 100% his idea from the very beginning.

  • @nonefvnfvnjnjnjevjenjvonej3384
    @nonefvnfvnjnjnjevjenjvonej3384 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lmaooo door lock and unlock and book meeting rooms is the operating system we os... what a great con this guy played. amazing.

  • @032603032603
    @032603032603 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    But it has an app!

  • @surjagain
    @surjagain 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The gift of the gab.

  • @thegalhorowitz
    @thegalhorowitz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2021 : WEWORK fromhome.

  • @loveormoney786
    @loveormoney786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Can’t wait to short this.

  • @volvol1
    @volvol1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Question: Are you profitable? 4:47 Listen to the totally deceptive answer. I love it when these "blue sky" salesmen come crashing to the ground. Hit in the face with reality. They were NOT able to bail out by selling hugely overpriced stock to suckers.

  • @GiveMeEyeballs
    @GiveMeEyeballs 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is just the beginning

  • @darev6780
    @darev6780 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This interview is all the more fascinating after just reading the book 'Anthem' by Ayn Rand.
    [ The usage of the word WE and the illegality of the word I ]

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This guy’s an eff-wit but Rand, come on, she’s a Nazi.

  • @Astrotase
    @Astrotase 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He won, he and his wife took off with 1.5 billion $ . That's a win

  • @vinestreet4031
    @vinestreet4031 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This kind of pitch is so one sided. Show he can justify anything.

  • @Potenti4lz
    @Potenti4lz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    He speaks very smart but simple Hah. Is it worth going to TechCrunch Disrupt SF?

    • @mipmip5759
      @mipmip5759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if you want to watch presentations of tomorrow's train wrecks

  • @321qazwsxedc123
    @321qazwsxedc123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    She's proud to be interviewing a criminal

    • @huzcer
      @huzcer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Typical idiot sychophant type startup interviewer.

    • @ilana3232
      @ilana3232 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He is NOT a criminal !!!! He is AN amazing sales man ,ssssssssssssuper brilliant and super good looking 💙🤍🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱

    • @ilana3232
      @ilana3232 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      💙🤍🇮🇱

  • @aguy1075
    @aguy1075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For future watchers, the “confusion” was how did this surveillance scam last so long?? I guess he forgot to “choose” to be profitable. The tech world is about to re-discover the value of cash flow. When does this tool end up in jail?

  • @bobbbobb4663
    @bobbbobb4663 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WeCon

  • @InjuriousPersonalities
    @InjuriousPersonalities 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    His voice literally sounds like Vitaly who does hidden camera pranks

  • @modesto885
    @modesto885 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just look at the way he rubs his hands together. He knows he's up to something,lol.

  • @TonyPadgett
    @TonyPadgett 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It’s Theranos all over again.

  • @blanket1309
    @blanket1309 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ok so WeWork is his personal piggy bank! He took a lot out of it.

  • @safiagha8002
    @safiagha8002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "55 to 60%".... interesting how this man just rounds up 5% of his total customers, as if no big deal. No wonder they didn't make a profit

  • @hassanqayyum8954
    @hassanqayyum8954 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "I really can't comment"...gives her the classic shut up before I snap your neck look lmao

  • @MASTERPPA
    @MASTERPPA 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I heard about this years ago, I just did not see how it would work.. Even before Covid..

  • @lee58901
    @lee58901 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    He’s a great salesman

    • @SFO14
      @SFO14 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s because he actually believes this shit. They horribly mismanaged themselves. They hemorrhaged capital and were over leveraged, sacrificing profit for market share at every turn. Just another cautionary tale.

  • @marcos-rodriguez
    @marcos-rodriguez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am a pragmatic person. I've been using the Wework spaces and I have to admit, there is a culture within WeWork that makes you feel welcome and focused on work. It's a feeling that I wouldn't expect anyone to understand unless they tried it in person. Wework should be valued as a technology company, not because it's a technology company but because WeWork members treat it as a technology company and that's all that matters. This work culture has been growing for the past 15 years and will still grow and WeWork will be there to match their needs.

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Several flags right there: you say you’re pragmatic but Adam despised pragmatism in favour of nonsense like “be a life-student & whilst we have no money, the value of what we offer is enough for us to be a trillion dollar business from which we can TAKE US380 million.” They took this $$ from tenants & VCs. Then the ideal that no one understood how WeWork made you feel welcome but “no one else’ll understand” this. Total BS: all businesses SHOULD be welcoming at the very least & no one fails “to understand this.”
      And you can’t value something as a technology co. when it ISN’T one just because it’s members hope to. Finally, there are no “members,” but tenants. Anything else is a weasel word. The Neumanns lived weasel words like no other.

    • @jiti5034
      @jiti5034 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok There might be value in it as member user / tenant depending upon where your business is at anything to do with manufacturing start up be mechanical / Chemical such centralized office space won't be suitable.. so that means the target market is smaller restricted to soft services / design / consulting etc still there is a market ... but why you say that it is a technology company ... The serviced office is the core .. and that is what is major fixed cost .. sure they can provide services like web hosting, Tax an accounting services to compliment the tenant businesses but core is still renting service .. what we work members think is less important in that sense !

  • @NewBalance-pu8ft
    @NewBalance-pu8ft 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The TH-cam ads of wework are always the same and not transporting the community spirit & atmosphere of the company workspace. This needs to be changed quickly and in a dramatic way! Because if You burn hundreds of millions of Dollars for an empty spot, it's a terrible waste. Make several meaningful different TH-cam spots each with a local or toll-free number in the intro and extro.

    • @cindytartt4048
      @cindytartt4048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, I read this as make ‘TH-cam spots with a troll- free number.” 😁🤪

  • @SPQR101010
    @SPQR101010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    lol we can "choose" when to be profitable

  • @slovokia
    @slovokia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Got to give this guy credit though - no matter how much money his investors end up losing, he will walk away with 100’s of millions of dollars.

  • @limacom
    @limacom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WE OS?

    • @timtreetwats
      @timtreetwats 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s a way to see who’s using the coffee machine. That alone Is worth 19 billion.

    • @PinchHarmonic69
      @PinchHarmonic69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@timtreetwats also you can get live updates pushed to your iWatch of who is taking a huge shit in the nearest bathroom

  • @balmukundsharma4764
    @balmukundsharma4764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't why but it's really funny to me

  • @njavwamutambo1441
    @njavwamutambo1441 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do everything in between

  • @user-si8zf9hy1b
    @user-si8zf9hy1b 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy was gooooood.....real good. Got to make money, adoration, parlay it longer, then land on his feet. Good gig if you can pull it off....

  • @singhyuvraj122
    @singhyuvraj122 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    R.I.P WeWork

  • @ellefant8938
    @ellefant8938 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wecrashed brought me here

  • @chanjunesen
    @chanjunesen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These bull crap conferences is the problem. They have hosts that do not question B.S spewed by these CEOs or company leadership. The host just reads the script and laugh along. Even I can do that job.

  • @TheDaftySage
    @TheDaftySage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The biggest joke is that this was considered a tech company. LOL.

  • @kshitijdixit4875
    @kshitijdixit4875 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:32

    • @loveormoney786
      @loveormoney786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would the landlords simply learn from them and destroy them. Or better yet what makes WeWork have a patent on designing cool work spaces. Other management companies can simply copy leading to margin degradation and a destruction of WeWork premium.

  • @jasminetorok933
    @jasminetorok933 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is a wonderful interview. I thoroughly enjoy and love WeWork locations, the team (virtual and in-person) and everything in between. Thank you WeWork for building a better world :).

    • @zd1322
      @zd1322 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Jesus, you sound like a bot.

    • @lolotaeja3911
      @lolotaeja3911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      L.O.fucking L.

    • @kennethsouthard6042
      @kennethsouthard6042 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Did Adam pay you $5 for that comment? If so you were really quite the sucker, considering how much he walked away with, you should have got $500 or at least a free couple of month's rent on a WeWork "hot desk." However, I'll bet you just drank the Kool-aid and did it for free.

    • @flaccidego9468
      @flaccidego9468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brainwashed cultist

    • @EdwardAndersen
      @EdwardAndersen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      WeWork’s losses quadrupled to $2.1bn (£1.47bn) in the first quarter as the pandemic-driven move to flexible working drove a 30% plunge in customers at the troubled office-sharing company.

  • @cheechalker8430
    @cheechalker8430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    …..that need (office space) does not go away in a recession…..”
    Maybe not a recession, but it goes away during a pandemic

  • @1234abcd12344
    @1234abcd12344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they change their title to WeDon'tWork

  • @pppinto97
    @pppinto97 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is just like Facebook. No privacy. " Cool " quotient to your product. Celebrity ish CEO. Monitors your behaviour (Facebook - Friends, Likes & Dislikes) (WeWork - Coffee & Loo Breaks)

  • @pitdog75
    @pitdog75 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uri Geller of business.

  • @paulag888
    @paulag888 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So complex.

    • @PrometheusHR
      @PrometheusHR 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      hell ya, I am planing on moving out of the city and making my cabin in the woods!. Soon enough people would own noting and will be subscribing everything. There will be no support whatsoever, the day you stop working, is the day you loose living!

  • @ufinlay
    @ufinlay 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Adam "Anything In-Between" Neumann

  • @andrepoon
    @andrepoon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    40% margins... and still not profitable... RED FLAG!

    • @MrPhatties
      @MrPhatties 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Creative accounting. The sad part is that they had a cool business model and could have easily been worth a reasonable amount, but this whole "startup" valuation did the opposite for their upside.

  • @latitudepost
    @latitudepost 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It seems to me that the general consensus right now is that WeWork is a bubble and will go bankrupt. It will be interesting to see what happens. But if WeWork can survive to the point where it develops a level of scale and economic moat in its industry that is hard to beat than it will be having the last laugh

    • @lordangelic
      @lordangelic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      only time will tell

    • @kennethsouthard6042
      @kennethsouthard6042 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that the only one having the last laugh right now is Adam. All the way to the bank.

    • @flaccidego9468
      @flaccidego9468 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wework was a bubble from its inception. In a market of normalized rates, these skittle shitting unicorns would never have gotten off ground. Zero to near rates will continue to give birth to more mark to fantasy nonsense.

  • @brianbrau4475
    @brianbrau4475 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    220 former employees didn't like this

  • @shileno19
    @shileno19 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    WeOs ya right

  • @jordan5253
    @jordan5253 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @6:55 hahahahha oh god what a master troll

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    theranos 2.0

  • @flaccidego9468
    @flaccidego9468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Weouttawork

  • @DerDudelino
    @DerDudelino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    He is an extremely sharp Founder. And yes, they got a 3 BN investment from Softbank.

    • @charlech
      @charlech 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good talker

    • @oisinquinn9469
      @oisinquinn9469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And softbank regret it badly now.

    • @dcodework2421
      @dcodework2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      this comment did not age well.

    • @tectera
      @tectera 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

    • @flaccidego9468
      @flaccidego9468 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe he was a sharp founder, but his business model is a flounder.

  • @jameslivermore4481
    @jameslivermore4481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    If he doesn't end up in prison for LIFE, I'm changing my name to something more exotic and getting in on the plunder.

    • @flaccidego9468
      @flaccidego9468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And work on an accent. The Israeli accent seems to work spells on people no matter how outrageous the product being sold. People seemed to also be hypnotized by British accents. My advice is 1st try out the British accent. AND only British. The Scotts & Irish brogues are certainly too rough. But the Aussie accent would work! Good luck.

    • @unknownchannel3141
      @unknownchannel3141 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Livermore" is fine.

  • @vimalbhaya3110
    @vimalbhaya3110 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can the anchor/moderator even say "130" members ? Show notes aside, number being too low should blow lot of alarms in brain by itself.

  • @ArtMaknev
    @ArtMaknev 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    He ran it into the ground...