The Bopape v Moloto case, which was decided in 1984 - long before I was born - may no longer be a relevant precedent, as the law has likely evolved significantly since then.
😂 So your telling me a grown man who was able to pay lobala is unable to divorce this person🙄😂lena🙄🙄 His bring forced in an unhappy marriage😩👀🚮🚮🚮🚮haowa
This law has been here for long. The answer to why not punish men is, the clause state that you need to alert the other person that they are dating her husband. The punishment to a me is to remove whatever on the way . Women will run away from. Then he can divorce and go enjoy without all fooling someone into marriage
Bopape case was money given to the side chick( its wife's money too since they are married inco of property), not the cheating. You can't sue a side just for cheating with your hubby ..whether she knew that he was married or not .
@@priority295 but in this live money has been the only reason to sue the side chick... Money... Hence another speaker mentioned bank statements etc... Money presumably from the joint estate.
Guys, if I tell a side chick to leave my husband alone for the first time, it's a warning because, in most cases, side chicks are not aware that these men are married. If she continues, now she knows that the man is married. Do I still blame my husband alone? Now they are both at fault, and I will deal with both of them.
Yoooh where did sagwie say its impossible? She said the wife is entitled to the 50% of that pension fund and the rest can be divided amongst the kids and proven dependents😩
@@SagwieRabs and who said she said it's impossible? For a legal podcast, you struggle with reading for comprehension. I said she WAS NOT HEARING IT. At first she said only if there's a child, and then she kept telling me about divorce act when I mentioned so many times that I'm talking DECEASED PERSON and not divorce, eventually she ended up agreeing and said "A side chick who was raised right won't claim"
@@Lungelo911 so I needed to say where wasn't she hearing it 🙄👀🚮yoooh guys! People with proof can claim agreed but the wife gets 50% and also a child's portion of the deceased's 50% as dependent. Side chicks may do so, that's from the deceased's share of the pension they cannot touch that of the wife(of course you didn't ask me about the latter, before you "come" for my comprehension😂)
@@Lungelo911 amen so I should have said where wasn't she hearing it 👀yoooh😂 😂... Am gonna leave it here and go back to school, deal with my language skills 😂.
😂 😂 😂 You think material evidence does not hold water... The court will assess material evidence and say hayi she did not know...she dated him over a year and did not know? Kahle ngwana mhani
@@SagwieRabs I am wondering if you are aware you agree with what I just said. To assess material evidence is to assess if the allegations are true or not. Unless if material evidence means something different from you. The court must be satisfied that the other woman/man, was aware of your marriage. This must be proved.
@@thapelolengana I think I really have a comprehension problem... Or am saying things hoping youl understand them my way. Your outlining that in order for such an action to work, the person instituting the action must prove that the side chick vividly knew that the man she is dating is married... Is that it?
In South African law, the answer is no, you cannot sue your husband's mistress (side chick) for damages related to their affair. South African courts have consistently held that a spouse cannot claim damages from a third party (in this case, the mistress) for enticement or alienation of affection. The courts reason that: 1. Marriage is a personal relationship, and issues arising from infidelity should be resolved between the spouses. 2. The mistress is not a party to the marriage contract, and therefore has no legal obligation to respect the marriage. However, you may have grounds for a divorce or legal separation due to your husband's infidelity, and you can seek legal advice for guidance on that. Keep in mind that laws can change, and specific circumstances may influence court decisions. Consult a South African attorney specializing in family law for up-to-date advice tailored to your situation.
Man are honest they tell them the only fool is the wife believe they have even time of saying don't call me when m home or on certain times that's what l saw
I have never confronted anyone but now I know his side chick bcs she saw my vid on his status girl started searching me and started insulting me with her family and my inlaws stood for me until today the girl still insulting me when I ask the husband he says they broke up blah blah but yoh she is on a mission plus she is a neighbor and am new in his environment
Your husband is disrespectful, why cheat with a neighbour. The reason she is still insulting you is because your husband is allowing her to. Your say your inlaws fought for you, but nowhere do you mention that the husband fought on your behalf.
@@madonnamoagi1154 maybe they doove her and that's ok but love from inlaws means nothing if the person you have given your heart and soul to... betrays you every chance he gets. Even if the inlaws don't change, if the husband turns his back, the love from inlaws means nothing to be honest. .
Our stupidity level is so high that we have guts to fight each other while instant of dealing with the elephant in the room
The fact that Madam Speaker is telling the honest brutal truth😂
Which truth my sister????
@@SagwieRabsthanks for asking😂
And why do women always fight each other.What about the man 😮.That shows how most of us women don't think straight
He will get a divorce coupled with spousal maintenance that one
Women preach about self love while men display self love
Ke sono ka di married women, le ntweng 24/7 why not leave and find peace? The enemy as Madam alluded to is the one in your bed.
The Bopape v Moloto case, which was decided in 1984 - long before I was born - may no longer be a relevant precedent, as the law has likely evolved significantly since then.
I think most wives are just in marriages are forcing MARRIAGE ,because men sometimes are nomore happy in these marriages
😂 So your telling me a grown man who was able to pay lobala is unable to divorce this person🙄😂lena🙄🙄
His bring forced in an unhappy marriage😩👀🚮🚮🚮🚮haowa
Emotional decisions are dangerous
Hello ladies. I love love this platform. I know of a men that was poured with acid guys....by his sidekicks men😢
This law has been here for long. The answer to why not punish men is, the clause state that you need to alert the other person that they are dating her husband. The punishment to a me is to remove whatever on the way . Women will run away from. Then he can divorce and go enjoy without all fooling someone into marriage
Not true, there's no such in SA.
Bopape V Moloto reported South African case ❤
Bopape case was money given to the side chick( its wife's money too since they are married inco of property), not the cheating. You can't sue a side just for cheating with your hubby ..whether she knew that he was married or not .
@@priority295 but in this live money has been the only reason to sue the side chick... Money... Hence another speaker mentioned bank statements etc... Money presumably from the joint estate.
It used to be there it was scrapped
Yoh this channel is nice shem😂😂😂😂😂😂
The way I'm having fun,is like house wives reunion😂
Guys, if I tell a side chick to leave my husband alone for the first time, it's a warning because, in most cases, side chicks are not aware that these men are married. If she continues, now she knows that the man is married. Do I still blame my husband alone? Now they are both at fault, and I will deal with both of them.
Sagwie is very disruptive shem. No ways.
I sit on trustee boards, if the side chick can show prove that ur cheating husband is supporting her, she can claim from the pension... Klaar
I tried telling them but the Sagwi wasn't hearing it 😂
Yoooh where did sagwie say its impossible? She said the wife is entitled to the 50% of that pension fund and the rest can be divided amongst the kids and proven dependents😩
@@SagwieRabs and who said she said it's impossible? For a legal podcast, you struggle with reading for comprehension. I said she WAS NOT HEARING IT. At first she said only if there's a child, and then she kept telling me about divorce act when I mentioned so many times that I'm talking DECEASED PERSON and not divorce, eventually she ended up agreeing and said "A side chick who was raised right won't claim"
@@Lungelo911 so I needed to say where wasn't she hearing it 🙄👀🚮yoooh guys!
People with proof can claim agreed but the wife gets 50% and also a child's portion of the deceased's 50% as dependent. Side chicks may do so, that's from the deceased's share of the pension they cannot touch that of the wife(of course you didn't ask me about the latter, before you "come" for my comprehension😂)
@@Lungelo911 amen so I should have said where wasn't she hearing it 👀yoooh😂
😂...
Am gonna leave it here and go back to school, deal with my language skills 😂.
In Zim, yes you can but hubby would still pay the money.
Pension fund doesn't form part of the estate hence we don't need a letter of authority when claiming.
Very true
The thing of suing the person your partner cheats with, only works when you can prove that the other woman knew , your partner was married.
😂 😂 😂 You think material evidence does not hold water... The court will assess material evidence and say hayi she did not know...she dated him over a year and did not know? Kahle ngwana mhani
@@SagwieRabs I am wondering if you are aware you agree with what I just said. To assess material evidence is to assess if the allegations are true or not. Unless if material evidence means something different from you.
The court must be satisfied that the other woman/man, was aware of your marriage. This must be proved.
@@SagwieRabsyou didn't understand my post, and you still don't.
@@thapelolengana I think I really have a comprehension problem... Or am saying things hoping youl understand them my way. Your outlining that in order for such an action to work, the person instituting the action must prove that the side chick vividly knew that the man she is dating is married...
Is that it?
heeeeeh i want to sue another lady 🎉God im gonna be rich , i wish she can see what im on now
This life no balance 😂
I need u cc to be my lawyer,im standing of a married wife
In South African law, the answer is no, you cannot sue your husband's mistress (side chick) for damages related to their affair.
South African courts have consistently held that a spouse cannot claim damages from a third party (in this case, the mistress) for enticement or alienation of affection.
The courts reason that:
1. Marriage is a personal relationship, and issues arising from infidelity should be resolved between the spouses.
2. The mistress is not a party to the marriage contract, and therefore has no legal obligation to respect the marriage.
However, you may have grounds for a divorce or legal separation due to your husband's infidelity, and you can seek legal advice for guidance on that.
Keep in mind that laws can change, and specific circumstances may influence court decisions. Consult a South African attorney specializing in family law for up-to-date advice tailored to your situation.
Man are honest they tell them the only fool is the wife believe they have even time of saying don't call me when m home or on certain times that's what l saw
The husband will settle the bill😂
Unye nyi😂😂😂😂
There is more sidechicks here
Are you a side chick ? 😂 just say it
what a joke my darling 🤣
Why is skwiza fighting the side ? Why is she not at her own home/ marriage ? She must fight her brother. This is the problem with unmarried Rakgadi's
Okay then, are you going to be happy in your marriag😊e after all this ??? Staying with the same man
I have never confronted anyone but now I know his side chick bcs she saw my vid on his status girl started searching me and started insulting me with her family and my inlaws stood for me until today the girl still insulting me when I ask the husband he says they broke up blah blah but yoh she is on a mission plus she is a neighbor and am new in his environment
Your husband is disrespectful, why cheat with a neighbour. The reason she is still insulting you is because your husband is allowing her to. Your say your inlaws fought for you, but nowhere do you mention that the husband fought on your behalf.
She's trying to insinuate the in laws love her 🤣😂 living a fairy tale. In laws can turn their back on you with your husband's permission too.
@@madonnamoagi1154 maybe they doove her and that's ok but love from inlaws means nothing if the person you have given your heart and soul to... betrays you every chance he gets. Even if the inlaws don't change, if the husband turns his back, the love from inlaws means nothing to be honest. .
😂😂😂 the law is lawing for wives..cos chicks law was lawing with them when husbands are dead to claim on section what what
Sad thruth gal
Madam are you a side??? 🥱
Yes
@@madams___speaker nice to know
@@madams___speaker 😂 please! Did she even listen to the end because what?
So just bcoz we wnt agree with some of the things we will be side?😢
Shame
@@madams___speaker😂😂😂haibo