@@williambarylocomedian is a master psychologist. you cant win an argument with a comedian. notice that piers usually made his guest look ridiculous or dumb but it doesnt work on bassem? because he knew not to mess with a comedian.
Mohammed Hijab has 3 Master degrees and is PhD candidate, he is an academic. The way Pierce Morgan introduced him was to make his audience think right from the outset that this guest is a 'controversial TH-camr'. Very devious of Piers Morgan.
And hijab should have laughed it off, like water off a ducks back.. and moved FLEXIBLY onto issues that MATTERED. it became about PENIS envy! The rhetoric that LOSES! when will the Ummah understand, we have already WON the battle, but we INSIST on LOSING the war😢😢😢
Truth is Hijab came across quite arrogant demanding he be known as an Oxford graduate. Who cares! If your there to talk about the plight and justice of the Palestinians why is your intro so important...for his ego and his own selfishness. He is by far the worst. He does not act like an academic. He insults others on twitter with such base talk about sex you would think he is a street thug. Bassem is by far the best.
What a good episode 👏 I really enjoyed it and yes I find Mohammed Hijab discussion suits certain audience where Bassam has reached everyone and he was very smart in this show. I have so much respect for Low-key highly educated and well spoken 👏
I blocked Piers Morgan's show from appearing in my YT timeline. The guy invites people in order to virtue check them when he, himself, is knowingly and cleverly using this war to make tons of money. It's despicable.
Piers is quite famous and he have to follow the script. It could be that it was a job given to him to interview pro- palestinian defenders and representors, push them to condemn Hamas and so on, cause in this war Israel have to look good in eyes for of publics opinion , so that those attrocities IDF do can be justifiable. However who represented Piers to Israels media specialists as unrelenting spokesperson and interviewer did a whacky job cause he looks like an idiot every time.. 🤣 However he gives platform to palestinian people and that's good, at least viewers can decipher where lies the truth ...
I agree up to a point. He introduces his show in long form content only to reduce pro palestine view to a fragmented section (short form) where he continually virtue checks them and prefaces them to condemn Hamas without answering the question re Israel himself. His job is not to take sides per se, but indeed SANITISE the Israeli army talking points, which to me is worse - wolf in sheep’s clothing. His paymasters pull his strings and he is manufacturing a narrative end of the day.
18:00 When Piers says "it's not my job to answer your questions". If you read the description of the original video the video is described as "a heated and emotive debate". A debate is a formal discussion where both parties ask questions, so yes Piers you have to answer his questions if this is a debate as per your own description of the video.
The are all winners in their own rights. Hijab did a great job of questioning Piers and leaving him speechless. Low-key spitted facts that the world had to listen to. Bassem’s approach was epic
The point is to demonstrate through facts, he spent more time showing his personal animosity towards Piers. The truth is he shows his hatred on tv just like he shows his contempt for the 'disbelivers' at speakers corner and his condescension does not due one iota of benefit. Bassem a non-scholar did a much better job.
@@mr.kavlas I completely disagree in regards to Hijab. We are allowed to have our own points of view ofcourse. Hijab is a highly intelligent man who has to be given credibility for the way he is able to call upon facts, literature and evidential backing for most of what he states and says. He has no hatred for anyone whatsoever, his in live with his faith and that I think is admirable, ok he may not share the same faith as many of us but that does not mean the man is not able to live his own faith. Bassem I agree is a great character even satirically he got the main points of views across. You left out Low-key… his mesmerising through his lyrics.
@@mr.kavlas I agree with you! It became about 'me, myself and I'... Penis envy etc.. fact is, I love everything Hijab has to say, just cannot stand the way he says it!
@@mr.kavlas- He destroyed the hypocrite with a much needed contempt. He exposed his deliberate attempt to denigrate him as 'controversial' setting him up before the audience that he couldn't be taken seriously; so naturally, he took that seriously. Your prior dislike of him dismisses your right to decide what "the truth is..." (sic) about him. I see, you also have denigrated Bassem as a non-scholar. Would he be 'condescending' too, if he were to identify himself as a cardiologist and a heart and lung surgeon?
@@autumnicleaf Respectfully labelling someone controversial is not 'denigrating'. Hijiab appeared scholarly but was disingenious bc arguing about his title was so important to Hijab touts himself as historian hence the reason. If you read his twitter attacks on anyone who critisizes Islam with adhominem attacks who will see how he descends to base insults. Now I didnt say Bassem was ignorant. I praised him in his approach and noticed how Bassem didnt demand to be addressed as "Dr" as getting nominal titles was not the reason he came on the show. Do you see the difference?
Bassem! Hats off!! Need more of Bassem. Lots of informations given ironically. He made Pierce listen to him for once. Yet MH and Lowkey are equally good!
@@williambaryloit FEELS like he is preaching to the converted, and trying to inflexibly, FORCE Feed what may be a receptive audience, and thus, 'losing ' them. Us Moslems simply do not understand how to 'gain votes'.. or the necessity of it, even if only to aid Kashmir, uygers,Chechnya, and PALESTINE! we NITPIK! failing to understand the war is won... But we proceed where we don't need to, and royally LOSE the bloody war!😢
I’m so glad I found your channel. Your delivery is beautiful. Your message is clear. Your voice is an audible opiate. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with me.
I have said it before, MH is not good when it comes to 1 on 1 formal discussions. He is an academic debator that likes to get in the mud and wrestle. It doesn't work well all the time. This was also apparent with Jordan Peterson. Bassem was most effective because he combined facts and figures with entertaining sarcasm. Lowkey was straight up facts and figures, no bs and no messing around.
MH is one of them He just wants to be famous he agreed with everything PM told him to agree to He is fake and just wants to be a celebrity and enjoy the fruits of satan's world
You hit the nail on the head! Mohammed Hijab, in his tone and manner ALIENATES .... I am already converted...but don't like this truthspeaking bombastic highly intelligent young man. ! Agree with EVERYTHING he says, but DISAPPOINTED AND DISAGREE with the yob manner in which he says it! He ALIENATES the ones who support him. Sad😢
It always feels like “ Let's bring voices from the other side just to look fair,but be careful,we need the presence of the voice,not the voice itself ”
His guests have brought Piers viewers many voices which probably formed a more balanced understanding. So for this he deserves praise, it has got lots of people discussing and thinking and commenting.
Thank you for this breakdown and analysis. We are facing having to answer this questions and it’s good to understand that bigger meanings behind what we may say.
Bassem is a professional entertainer That's why he could express his point easily and a layman will absorb it, Hijab was Technical and not all people will get entertained to absorb the idea
Bassem is like the Middle Eastern version of Jon Stewart plus he was a surgeon or in medical field sends the point home in comical informative succinct points basically satire Hijab is logician but needs polishing nevertheless he presses on when it’s needed if only he drops the ad hominem attacks ( with freaky rabbi shumely about his kinks his daughter etc but honestly the rabbi was a POS) Haven’t checked Lowkey so can’t comment
Interesting video.....have you seen the interaction between Piers Morgan and Dr. Gabor Mate.......very interesting to watch the interaction and very impressive to see Dr Mate retain his calm demeanor throughout the interview.....thank you
Hijab was the best. He was the most aggressive and that is the best way to deal with Piers. Hijab's line to Piers 'Why are you stuttering ?' was priceless ! Hijab floored him.
@@williambarylo I think you should include a fourth Piers interview with Hussam Zumlot, the Palestinian Ambassador to the UK. In that Zumlot mentions other aspects that western people should know. He tells Piers Palestine is the cradle of Christianity. He tells him the IDF bombed a Christian run hospital and church. Peirs of course says BBC has proved it was a Palestinian missile. Christianity has died in the west and they have become so shameless that they don't even stand up for Christians, they are so much into defendingJews.
They all winners Piers thought he Knew it all All 3 flattened Piers time and time again Piers Underestimated their Intelligence and their Wealth of Knowledge 😂😂😂😂😂 Piers Morgan Off you go
I comment just before listening to your analysis. I think that Mohammed Hijab is very good in debating and logics, but in this case the other side didn´t give him any LOGICAL statement to debunk. And he was triggedered at the beginning by being called " a Palenstinian activist", wich he was right to call out but not with so much emotion. Generally I think Piers was very disrepctful in all 3 encounters, but in this one in particular. Bassem was a genius! ... the only thing he was not expecting Piers to be so unbalanced and onesided (due maybe to the fact that they could have known each other previously). And Lowkey was a good Poker Face that didn allow any kind of steps in the head by the host.
@@williambarylo Yours was very precise. I think we need more of this content. Every one of us will be pulled into some debate sooner or later and it is a good thing to have people showingnus how rethorics works.
😂 very true, these interviews are like a game.... Answer the 3 basic questions, Piers is a sob and...most of us Arabs know it...😮😮😮 I can assure you I, Lebanese Christian Canadian and my entourage are disgusted at the media biased views of the West 🙈
@@williambarylo Well...to us, it's not a game, it's so evident...we've known the hypocrisy for decades.. 😺 all they managed to do is to unite arabs, majority of people don't understand that
@movid good on you 👍🏾👍🏾 Please educate people that there are Arab Christians, including Palestinian Christians, and that they are all on side when it comes to the Palestinian tragedy. بارك الله فيك
Low-key really cooked Piers so good,he just want the interview to be ended asap before thing even more out of control and he stopped received that sweet sweet sheckel to his bank account.
Oh man! I’m glad I’ve come across one of your videos. Your analysis of the techniques used by each debater is a spot on. A lot can be learnt from you. I didn’t like Mohammad hijab’s episode that much. Being on defensive side makes you appear as a weak debater. As you said, this program is meant for entertainment but since the topics discussed are important, the guests should come with the intention to spread the truth and help the viewers see a particular issue from a brand new perspective. Once you come to Piers Morgan program to show off your muscles, you end up being embarrassed because whether we like it or not, Piers is very clever as well as incredibly obstinate. The last thing, I don’t know you but soubhana Allah you look Muslim 😂.
Thank you! Hijab has built his style for a different audience and purpose indeed. Being on a TV debate is a whole different thing in contrast to "street da'wah". As Lowkey and Bassem Youssef have shown, the key is to just say what you have to say, no matter what Piers say!
Man I loved your analysis Your game analysis is great I been through games from a psychological view and you added media game for me I appreciate it so much
This is exactly what we need, Thank you for this upload, people need to expose this game the BBC are playing. They avoid all the important questions, its just to get the viewings.
You are an amazing commentator/analyst Dr William. You are a new discovery for me.. .a very good point you hilghted: one is entertaining, the other one has a real cause to defend, a healthy honest debate is already thwarted right from the start. En résumé: honnêteté Vs hypocrisie
Bassesm takes it for me. 1.He caught piers in a lie. 2. After Piers was telling us what "he thinks" all show, he decided he did not want to answer questions anymore 😅
I think that Bassem has the best approach for the greater audience but I think it's also important to acknowledge that all these approaches are in my opinion complementary. I personally prefer Hijab's approach. I don't think his goal was necessarily to come here and speak about the plight of the Palestinians. It was to challenge the approach of these platforms regarding their coverage. A running theme throughout his whole interview is double standard, from his introduction, to the argument of self defense, to the coverage, to the air time, to the nature of the questions being asked, to the refusal to condemn, to the plausible deniability given to each side. I think he did that better than anyone else. On the contrary I find Lowekey's approach to be the weakest because he doesn't challenge Piers enough. He was a better advocate for the plight of Palestinians but he did let Piers make his points. EDIT: I also disagree with Hijab being on the defensive. Most of the show was actually Hijab pressing Piers. Not the other way around.
I like Bassem , comedic genius. Using satire to deliver the truth in disguise. But They 3 are all insightful, & have 1 similarity: ben saripo would never dare to debate any of them in live show.
I am SICK of the Condemnation Game. Do YOU Condemn the 40 Babies Beheading ( lie)? US Secretary of state Madeline Allbight who is of Jewish Background, When asked about reports that half a Million Iraqi Children have died because of American Sanctions on Iraq. Her Reply was we think, the price is worth it. DID ANYONE CONDEMN THIS WOMEN?
Brilliant analysis William, I am glade I accidentally found your channel. That's an amazing statement "as Palestine is a side note", exactly, for Piers Palestinians are insignificants. I am sure Piers regretted inviting Hijab and Youssef, I watched both interviews and Piers was humiliated by the honestly of Hijab such as: you have been fired for fake images, why didn't introduced me as university graduate but as a controversial...etc Piers was also humiliated by the overwhelming sarcasm of Youssef, I didn't understand at the beginning and I had to watch it again to understand the unbelievable sarcasm of Youssef.
Thank you! I think sadly that Piers Morgan knows it's his job to be controversial... but it's good for the audience to be reminded of the facts and know that he's not just any TV host!
@@williambaryloindeed. It's an interesting sight indeed. Each of the three speakers, including Lowkey, has their own strong forte, and their quality complements each other in what they lack. Thank you for the brilliant analysis sir!
After removing Hamas from Gaza, will Israel comply with the international law and let the Palestinians to have their own state, or will It create other excuses to build more settlements on the Palestinians land which is recognised by the international community???
Bonjour, vos vidéos me régalent comme toujours. J'aime votre façon d'analyser, c'est très intelligent et très clair. Je suis d'accord avec le fait que hijab est rentré dans des détails pas très facilement compréhensible par les gens et aussi tombé dans ce combat (un peu personnel ) contre piers, malheureusement ça a détourné le débat de la principale cause. Mais je le remercie quand même pour son travail et son courage. Bassem comme vous avez dit est un présentateur télé, je le connais très bien, je regardais ses shows en arabe, et sa technique est de caricaturer puis balancer une réalité effrayante. Et ça a bien marché contre piers qui n'a pas été préparé pour ce genre de réponses. Lowkey je ne l'ai pas vu, je vais justement aller voir ça de suite, En tout cas, j'adore vraiment vos vidéos monsieur. J'admire votre travail et votre intelligence. Je prie pour vous tous, que allah vous protège et vous donne de la force pour continuer vos recherches et vos quêtes de savoir. Je prie aussi qu'Allah m'envoie un mari intelligent comme vous 🙈🙈
Bassem took the words out my mouth if I came on tv on piers Morgan show and he said “do you condemn Hamas” I would say “here I condemn let me bow down for you and I also don’t condemn if 🇮🇱 drops a nuke 💣 on the Palestinians” then watch his facial reactions…..
If Piers Morgan really cared about Palestinian people he wouldn’t spend his time prosecuting a human rights activist, instead he would be discussing how the suffering of Palestinians can be stopped. His job is to bring human rights supporters on his show to try to discredit them
Hijab's approach best fits an opponent who fights the same way. Piers is simply not an appropriate opponent for Hijab's style. Bassem knows Piers' wheelhouse. And he knows how to run circles around dishonest individuals by not giving them the satisfaction. Instead, he makes them realise how foolish their own position is and you cannot hold a position on a foundation of sand. In the end, as Piers did, the dishonest begin spinning lies to cover their own behinds. Lowkey was like a mighty glacier. Stoic, slow, but certain. He just moved forward with facts unfazed by Piers' nonsense.
You have to remember one thing, it' the oppressed that has the right to defend himself and not the oppressor. If you don't understand this, your are not a human being.
Muhammad Hijab is a professional debator and will not allow Morgan to put him in a corner. He knows Morgan's approach very well, and Morgan sensed it and ended the discussion early.
this is why, I'm telling, that the prophet Muhammad SAW once warned us, muslim, to stay away from this kind debate. This debate aim no in the truht. Its aim is only to beat their opponent, and in most case, it always make the truth even more hard to be seen because of how the conversation going on. The prophet said : "And whoever abandons debate, even though he is above the truth, Allah will build a house for him in heaven." (HR Tirmidhi and Ibnu Majah from Anas bin Malik). This hadist is not telling us to be silent, or not telling us to stop telling the truth when injustice occurs. not telling us to not open the talk, of course. We need to talk, we need telling the truht when injustice occurs. We need to open a discourse. But the point is, there is some kind of conversation you need to avoid. To avoid "this kind of debate". In my country, we categorize this thing as "cart driver debate". No truth can be seen from the debate. Just two guys trying to outplay each other with their strategy and technique. Their concern is always their arrogance to see who is the winner. Not to see which is the truth. A conversation to seek truth doesn't need gimmick, strategy or anything. When you notice your opponent using those kind of thing, you should know that the conversation is not seeking for the truth. It's just a conversation to imposing the fallacy. Just stay away from it even if you are on the right side. Because the other side came to you with their own preterminded mind, which they already accept as a fact even before the conversation start, which indicate he is not seeking for the truht. So, telling him the truht is useless, because they don't want to hear the truht from you. They already have their own predeterminded truth inside his head. So, the conversation is useless, you better stay away from it.
Mr Hijab used logic mainly Bassem used dark comedy and mocked their arrogance and lies and these people don't use logic, they don't use their brains so the Bassem approach is better in this case that what I think
Another thing, if you noticed, this tv host always starts by asking the guests the same question about how they felt on October 7th (when Hamas attacked Israel). October 7th is just one piece in a conflict that has been going on for decades. Guests should ignore that single fragment and focus on 1948, when Palestine was occupied, when the state of Israel was proclaimed and recognized by the international community. That's the crux.
The fact that they want you to be ignorer in is : Israel knew about the attack 10 days before The violance that was happened against civilians deliberately was by armed israeli it wasn't in the name of Hamas " The israeli people did manifestate in front of an Israeli hospital in which that wonded militants was being treated "
Ham4s is the resistance group established in 1987. Isr4el atrocities have been carried out since the unilateral Balfour Declaration proposed in the British in 1917.
@@williambarylo I thought the spirit of enquiry would have been more apparent, had he attended Oxford university...He seems to me very closed minded. A person who arrived there to teach them something...as if.
@@anthonycharnock6560 Going Oxford doesn't make you a better debater sadly. Most academic degrees are pieces of paper to put on your CV rather than teaching skills
Bassem has the best approach. These people will feel no shame until you laugh at them and mock their absolutely ridiculous view points.
He knows that the most important party in these debates is the audience!
i swear i am convinced that hhh aaaaaa_mmmmm aaaaaaa_ssssss is the truth
I agree Bassem's approach is effective. All 3 are smart.
Definitely, he captivated his audience because his approach was so different.
@@williambarylocomedian is a master psychologist. you cant win an argument with a comedian. notice that piers usually made his guest look ridiculous or dumb but it doesnt work on bassem? because he knew not to mess with a comedian.
Bassem got the most information out on the entire Palestinian issue
He's really well informed. Lowkey too has his facts on point and know which angle to attack from!
he is a stupid liar - all the palestinian issue in one word? STUPID
Mohammed Hijab has 3 Master degrees and is PhD candidate, he is an academic. The way Pierce Morgan introduced him was to make his audience think right from the outset that this guest is a 'controversial TH-camr'. Very devious of Piers Morgan.
Very vicious!
to make people think that he's just a you tuber that is a radical muslim
And hijab should have laughed it off, like water off a ducks back.. and moved FLEXIBLY onto issues that MATTERED. it became about PENIS envy! The rhetoric that LOSES! when will the Ummah understand, we have already WON the battle, but we INSIST on LOSING the war😢😢😢
Truth is Hijab came across quite arrogant demanding he be known as an Oxford graduate. Who cares! If your there to talk about the plight and justice of the Palestinians why is your intro so important...for his ego and his own selfishness. He is by far the worst. He does not act like an academic. He insults others on twitter with such base talk about sex you would think he is a street thug. Bassem is by far the best.
@@mr.kavlas well said..and sort of physically intimidating and belligerent too...
What a good episode 👏 I really enjoyed it and yes I find Mohammed Hijab discussion suits certain audience where Bassam has reached everyone and he was very smart in this show. I have so much respect for Low-key highly educated and well spoken 👏
Thank you!
I’m an Arab Atheist of course I’m pro Palestine. The Bible is too blame for the apartheid country. @@williambarylo
Hijab is a moron
I blocked Piers Morgan's show from appearing in my YT timeline.
The guy invites people in order to virtue check them when he, himself, is knowingly and cleverly using this war to make tons of money.
It's despicable.
Indeed, sadly it's all about money!
Very very true he is a scammer
Piers is quite famous and he have to follow the script. It could be that it was a job given to him to interview pro- palestinian defenders and representors, push them to condemn Hamas and so on, cause in this war Israel have to look good in eyes for of publics opinion , so that those attrocities IDF do can be justifiable. However who represented Piers to Israels media specialists as unrelenting spokesperson and interviewer did a whacky job cause he looks like an idiot every time.. 🤣 However he gives platform to palestinian people and that's good, at least viewers can decipher where lies the truth ...
I agree up to a point.
He introduces his show in long form content only to reduce pro palestine view to a fragmented section (short form) where he continually virtue checks them and prefaces them to condemn Hamas without answering the question re Israel himself. His job is not to take sides per se, but indeed SANITISE the Israeli army talking points, which to me is worse - wolf in sheep’s clothing.
His paymasters pull his strings and he is manufacturing a narrative end of the day.
Sometimes you may loose the respect of majority for shameless act of minority he better watch out
I truly enjoyed listening to your talk. Thanks for sharing your insight brother.
18:00 When Piers says "it's not my job to answer your questions". If you read the description of the original video the video is described as "a heated and emotive debate". A debate is a formal discussion where both parties ask questions, so yes Piers you have to answer his questions if this is a debate as per your own description of the video.
He actually answers... until he decides to change the rules!
His invited people need to know or memorize that.
I reject a debate equate as discussion. The purpose of debate is to win and not to learn knowledge from each other.
The are all winners in their own rights. Hijab did a great job of questioning Piers and leaving him speechless. Low-key spitted facts that the world had to listen to. Bassem’s approach was epic
The point is to demonstrate through facts, he spent more time showing his personal animosity towards Piers. The truth is he shows his hatred on tv just like he shows his contempt for the 'disbelivers' at speakers corner and his condescension does not due one iota of benefit. Bassem a non-scholar did a much better job.
@@mr.kavlas I completely disagree in regards to Hijab. We are allowed to have our own points of view ofcourse. Hijab is a highly intelligent man who has to be given credibility for the way he is able to call upon facts, literature and evidential backing for most of what he states and says. He has no hatred for anyone whatsoever, his in live with his faith and that I think is admirable, ok he may not share the same faith as many of us but that does not mean the man is not able to live his own faith. Bassem I agree is a great character even satirically he got the main points of views across. You left out Low-key… his mesmerising through his lyrics.
@@mr.kavlas I agree with you! It became about 'me, myself and I'... Penis envy etc.. fact is, I love everything Hijab has to say, just cannot stand the way he says it!
@@mr.kavlas- He destroyed the hypocrite with a much needed contempt. He exposed his deliberate attempt to denigrate him as 'controversial' setting him up before the audience that he couldn't be taken seriously; so naturally, he took that seriously.
Your prior dislike of him dismisses your right to decide what "the truth is..." (sic) about him.
I see, you also have denigrated Bassem as a non-scholar. Would he be 'condescending' too, if he were to identify himself as a cardiologist and a heart and lung surgeon?
@@autumnicleaf Respectfully labelling someone controversial is not 'denigrating'. Hijiab appeared scholarly but was disingenious bc arguing about his title was so important to Hijab touts himself as historian hence the reason. If you read his twitter attacks on anyone who critisizes Islam with adhominem attacks who will see how he descends to base insults.
Now I didnt say Bassem was ignorant. I praised him in his approach and noticed how Bassem didnt demand to be addressed as "Dr" as getting nominal titles was not the reason he came on the show. Do you see the difference?
Bassem! Hats off!! Need more of Bassem. Lots of informations given ironically. He made Pierce listen to him for once. Yet MH and Lowkey are equally good!
Hijab is an academic and a teacher it's hard not to resort to teaching and technical points. Good video and analysis
Yes! I thought the same thing, it feels like he's trying to teach Piers Morgan something
@@williambarylo i should add, jazakallah khayr for your coverage during this difficult time for the islamic ummah.
@@williambaryloit FEELS like he is preaching to the converted, and trying to inflexibly, FORCE Feed what may be a receptive audience, and thus, 'losing ' them. Us Moslems simply do not understand how to 'gain votes'.. or the necessity of it, even if only to aid Kashmir, uygers,Chechnya, and PALESTINE! we NITPIK! failing to understand the war is won... But we proceed where we don't need to, and royally LOSE the bloody war!😢
If hes a teacher then i am allahs mother 😂
I’m so glad I found your channel. Your delivery is beautiful. Your message is clear. Your voice is an audible opiate. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with me.
No please, careful with opiates unless prescribed for pain relief
all are brothers fighting for the cause but Bassem absolutely blew the roof off and really showed the hypocrisy for what it is
Thank you, thank you 🙏
I am so pleased to have found you-great analysis & deconstruction of the lazy “mainstream” narrative 🙏🕯️
Thank you!
I have said it before, MH is not good when it comes to 1 on 1 formal discussions. He is an academic debator that likes to get in the mud and wrestle. It doesn't work well all the time. This was also apparent with Jordan Peterson. Bassem was most effective because he combined facts and figures with entertaining sarcasm. Lowkey was straight up facts and figures, no bs and no messing around.
Good summary!
Lol who are you to say "MH is not goos...bla bla"
MH is one of them He just wants to be famous he agreed with everything PM told him to agree to He is fake and just wants to be a celebrity and enjoy the fruits of satan's world
@@khader3643
One of his biggest fans, alhamdulillah.
You hit the nail on the head! Mohammed Hijab, in his tone and manner ALIENATES .... I am already converted...but don't like this truthspeaking bombastic highly intelligent young man. ! Agree with EVERYTHING he says, but DISAPPOINTED AND DISAGREE with the yob manner in which he says it! He ALIENATES the ones who support him. Sad😢
Brilliant analysis by the host. Thanks for your mental lucidity ❤
It always feels like “ Let's bring voices from the other side just to look fair,but be careful,we need the presence of the voice,not the voice itself ”
😮 how clever you are!!
You just have put it in simple and clear language. paraphrasing
On point!
nice wording.
His guests have brought Piers viewers many voices which probably formed a more balanced understanding. So for this he deserves praise, it has got lots of people discussing and thinking and commenting.
Thank you for this breakdown and analysis. We are facing having to answer this questions and it’s good to understand that bigger meanings behind what we may say.
What you are doing is great, keep doing this.
Thank you!
Absolutely you are right Bossem is reaching out the mass audience. Very cleaver tactics.
Thank You for great and amazing Analysis & Expertise ❣ Greetings from Germany
thank you!
Bassem is a professional entertainer That's why he could express his point easily and a layman will absorb it, Hijab was Technical and not all people will get entertained to absorb the idea
Hijab needs more experience with TV, this is a whole different game
Bassem is like the Middle Eastern version of Jon Stewart plus he was a surgeon or in medical field sends the point home in comical informative succinct points basically satire
Hijab is logician but needs polishing nevertheless he presses on when it’s needed if only he drops the ad hominem attacks ( with freaky rabbi shumely about his kinks his daughter etc but honestly the rabbi was a POS)
Haven’t checked Lowkey so can’t comment
I thoroughly enjoyed your analysis. Jazakallah khayr. Just finished the video
Thank you!
Interesting video.....have you seen the interaction between Piers Morgan and Dr. Gabor Mate.......very interesting to watch the interaction and very impressive to see Dr Mate retain his calm demeanor throughout the interview.....thank you
A whole different game indeed!
Dr.William , I really appreciate what u doing, very smart of u
Bassem hands down !!! The total package and incredibly handsome man too!
The goal of these PM shows is not for truth but for entertainment🇵🇸
Sadly indeed!
But he serves the case without the intention
Gods bless you for this analysis because I understand much better
Thank you!
Hijab was the best. He was the most aggressive and that is the best way to deal with Piers.
Hijab's line to Piers 'Why are you stuttering ?' was priceless ! Hijab floored him.
If the fight is against Piers, definitely!
@@williambarylo I think you should include a fourth Piers interview with Hussam Zumlot, the Palestinian Ambassador to the UK. In that Zumlot mentions other aspects that western people should know. He tells Piers Palestine is the cradle of Christianity. He tells him the IDF bombed a Christian run hospital and church. Peirs of course says BBC has proved it was a Palestinian missile.
Christianity has died in the west and they have become so shameless that they don't even stand up for Christians, they are so much into defendingJews.
All of them were great, taking different styles by each of them. Their message was truth. And the people are listening.
Yayy!
They all winners
Piers thought he Knew it all
All 3 flattened Piers time and time again
Piers Underestimated their Intelligence and their Wealth of Knowledge
😂😂😂😂😂
Piers Morgan Off you go
One fun fact : Piers Morgan doesn't interrupt football players when they talk.
À méditer !
...and Israeli officials!
@@williambaryloor Jordan Peterson!!!! It was total word salad, verbal diarrhea.... But Piers allowed it to spew, uninterrupted!❤
I comment just before listening to your analysis. I think that Mohammed Hijab is very good in debating and logics, but in this case the other side didn´t give him any LOGICAL statement to debunk. And he was triggedered at the beginning by being called " a Palenstinian activist", wich he was right to call out but not with so much emotion. Generally I think Piers was very disrepctful in all 3 encounters, but in this one in particular. Bassem was a genius! ... the only thing he was not expecting Piers to be so unbalanced and onesided (due maybe to the fact that they could have known each other previously).
And Lowkey was a good Poker Face that didn allow any kind of steps in the head by the host.
That's a good analysis!
@@williambarylo Yours was very precise. I think we need more of this content. Every one of us will be pulled into some debate sooner or later and it is a good thing to have people showingnus how rethorics works.
😂 very true, these interviews are like a game.... Answer the 3 basic questions, Piers is a sob and...most of us Arabs know it...😮😮😮 I can assure you I, Lebanese Christian Canadian and my entourage are disgusted at the media biased views of the West 🙈
Good to know people can see through that game!
@@williambarylo Well...to us, it's not a game, it's so evident...we've known the hypocrisy for decades.. 😺 all they managed to do is to unite arabs, majority of people don't understand that
@movid good on you 👍🏾👍🏾 Please educate people that there are Arab Christians, including Palestinian Christians, and that they are all on side when it comes to the Palestinian tragedy.
بارك الله فيك
Bassem was savage without telling us he.s savage.😅with some dark humour.😊
He was brilliant. He knows the game though!
I really enjoyed your analysis, is absolutely make sense. Thank you 👍
thank you!
@@williambarylo you are welcome, I really enjoyed your analysis. Thank you so much 😊 looking forward to your upcoming uploads
Great video as always. May Allah bless you!
Thank you!
allah is busy - helping the idf to fuck hamas up
@@williambarylo are you a Muslim?
This is such a great video. I think you should do more reaction videos like this :)
Thank you! It's in the works!
👍👍👍👍👍
Low-key really cooked Piers so good,he just want the interview to be ended asap before thing even more out of control and he stopped received that sweet sweet sheckel to his bank account.
Oh man! I’m glad I’ve come across one of your videos. Your analysis of the techniques used by each debater is a spot on. A lot can be learnt from you.
I didn’t like Mohammad hijab’s episode that much. Being on defensive side makes you appear as a weak debater. As you said, this program is meant for entertainment but since the topics discussed are important, the guests should come with the intention to spread the truth and help the viewers see a particular issue from a brand new perspective. Once you come to Piers Morgan program to show off your muscles, you end up being embarrassed because whether we like it or not, Piers is very clever as well as incredibly obstinate.
The last thing, I don’t know you but soubhana Allah you look Muslim 😂.
Thank you! Hijab has built his style for a different audience and purpose indeed. Being on a TV debate is a whole different thing in contrast to "street da'wah". As Lowkey and Bassem Youssef have shown, the key is to just say what you have to say, no matter what Piers say!
@@williambarylo Exactly! I’m happy to read your reply to my comment. God bless you.
Even P Morgan suprised with the compliment 😂, Dr Bossem knows his stratigies to put Morgan P into his place.
Man
I loved your analysis
Your game analysis is great
I been through games from a psychological view and you added media game for me
I appreciate it so much
Thank you!
This is exactly what we need, Thank you for this upload, people need to expose this game the BBC are playing. They avoid all the important questions, its just to get the viewings.
You are an amazing commentator/analyst Dr William. You are a new discovery for me.. .a very good point you hilghted: one is entertaining, the other one has a real cause to defend, a healthy honest debate is already thwarted right from the start. En résumé: honnêteté Vs hypocrisie
Merci!!
J’apprécie ton travail William merci beaucoup pour ce que tu fais !
Merci!
All of them are winners! Bravo for all three of them! They have different style n we need all of them.
Definitely Bassem
Definitely Lowkey is the winner for me.
Bassesm takes it for me.
1.He caught piers in a lie.
2. After Piers was telling us what "he thinks" all show, he decided he did not want to answer questions anymore 😅
Pure mastery
I think that Bassem has the best approach for the greater audience but I think it's also important to acknowledge that all these approaches are in my opinion complementary. I personally prefer Hijab's approach. I don't think his goal was necessarily to come here and speak about the plight of the Palestinians. It was to challenge the approach of these platforms regarding their coverage. A running theme throughout his whole interview is double standard, from his introduction, to the argument of self defense, to the coverage, to the air time, to the nature of the questions being asked, to the refusal to condemn, to the plausible deniability given to each side. I think he did that better than anyone else. On the contrary I find Lowekey's approach to be the weakest because he doesn't challenge Piers enough. He was a better advocate for the plight of Palestinians but he did let Piers make his points.
EDIT: I also disagree with Hijab being on the defensive. Most of the show was actually Hijab pressing Piers. Not the other way around.
Yeah, I think they're all complementary.
And I agree, I meant to say Hijab has got his guard up when Piers tried to attack him
I like Bassem , comedic genius. Using satire to deliver the truth in disguise. But They 3 are all insightful, & have 1 similarity: ben saripo would never dare to debate any of them in live show.
I think Ben Shapiro would but it would just be non-constructive!
I appreciate lowkey as this was a very unexpected appearance.
Excellent analysis 👍
Great breakdown. Well done.
thank you!
Great analysis as always.
Thank you!
I am SICK of the Condemnation Game.
Do YOU Condemn the 40 Babies Beheading ( lie)?
US Secretary of state Madeline Allbight who is of Jewish Background, When asked about reports that half a Million Iraqi Children have died because of American Sanctions on Iraq.
Her Reply was we think, the price is worth it.
DID ANYONE CONDEMN THIS WOMEN?
Well said
Brilliant analysis William, I am glade I accidentally found your channel. That's an amazing statement "as Palestine is a side note", exactly, for Piers Palestinians are insignificants.
I am sure Piers regretted inviting Hijab and Youssef, I watched both interviews and Piers was humiliated by the honestly of Hijab such as: you have been fired for fake images, why didn't introduced me as university graduate but as a controversial...etc
Piers was also humiliated by the overwhelming sarcasm of Youssef, I didn't understand at the beginning and I had to watch it again to understand the unbelievable sarcasm of Youssef.
Thank you! I think sadly that Piers Morgan knows it's his job to be controversial... but it's good for the audience to be reminded of the facts and know that he's not just any TV host!
@@williambarylo exactly thanks for this reminder
Nobody wins, Three of them are brave enough to come to defend Palestine's children, women and elderly.
Well said!
I like this comment!💕
To me, hijab was the best but all three did greatly well.
He was on a mission!
The most aggressive of the three
Lowkey was the most informative
Bassem was the most politically savvy the best presenter
I am sure these fantastic men gave pier Morgan a lot viewers he should appreciate them
Your analysis is excellent
thank you!
Lowkey was the most powerful speaker- he framed the plight of the Palestinian the best- Hijab was competing with Ben Shapiro a bit
Lowkey's got years of activism and public speaking under his belt and it shows!
@@williambaryloindeed. It's an interesting sight indeed. Each of the three speakers, including Lowkey, has their own strong forte, and their quality complements each other in what they lack.
Thank you for the brilliant analysis sir!
Well said 👏
After removing Hamas from Gaza, will Israel comply with the international law and let the Palestinians to have their own state, or will It create other excuses to build more settlements on the Palestinians land which is recognised by the international community???
Good point
Bassem’s approach was the most effect by miles
Please discuss the interview of Cenk Uigur (of the Young Turks channel) with Piers Morgan. Cenk Uigur TORE HIM APART!
Bonjour, vos vidéos me régalent comme toujours.
J'aime votre façon d'analyser, c'est très intelligent et très clair.
Je suis d'accord avec le fait que hijab est rentré dans des détails pas très facilement compréhensible par les gens et aussi tombé dans ce combat (un peu personnel ) contre piers, malheureusement ça a détourné le débat de la principale cause. Mais je le remercie quand même pour son travail et son courage.
Bassem comme vous avez dit est un présentateur télé, je le connais très bien, je regardais ses shows en arabe, et sa technique est de caricaturer puis balancer une réalité effrayante. Et ça a bien marché contre piers qui n'a pas été préparé pour ce genre de réponses.
Lowkey je ne l'ai pas vu, je vais justement aller voir ça de suite,
En tout cas, j'adore vraiment vos vidéos monsieur.
J'admire votre travail et votre intelligence.
Je prie pour vous tous, que allah vous protège et vous donne de la force pour continuer vos recherches et vos quêtes de savoir.
Je prie aussi qu'Allah m'envoie un mari intelligent comme vous 🙈🙈
Merci et ameen pour vos du'as!
يهديك الله أ نعيمة 😂
@@mwamwa8296 ameen ya Rab
Bassem took the words out my mouth if I came on tv on piers Morgan show and he said “do you condemn Hamas” I would say “here I condemn let me bow down for you and I also don’t condemn if 🇮🇱 drops a nuke 💣 on the Palestinians” then watch his facial reactions…..
Mashallah they all did well...
Love this clip and your point of view 👌🏻
Thank you!
Both Bassam and Hijab smashed Piers, unfortunately I believe Lowkey had alot more to give but felt he got cut off short otherwise all 3 for sure!
Indeed
If Piers Morgan really cared about Palestinian people he wouldn’t spend his time prosecuting a human rights activist, instead he would be discussing how the suffering of Palestinians can be stopped.
His job is to bring human rights supporters on his show to try to discredit them
Indeed
And he FAILED every time!
Hijab's approach best fits an opponent who fights the same way. Piers is simply not an appropriate opponent for Hijab's style.
Bassem knows Piers' wheelhouse. And he knows how to run circles around dishonest individuals by not giving them the satisfaction. Instead, he makes them realise how foolish their own position is and you cannot hold a position on a foundation of sand. In the end, as Piers did, the dishonest begin spinning lies to cover their own behinds.
Lowkey was like a mighty glacier. Stoic, slow, but certain. He just moved forward with facts unfazed by Piers' nonsense.
Spot on!!
Yeah. The Mr Hijab interview was an ego measuring trip unfortunately. Mr Hijab just got into bickering and the real issues were smothered!
TV debates are very different from street debates indeed!
This was a very good analysis. Thank you brother.
جزاك الله خيرا
Thank you!
Piers Morgan must interview our CIC Julius Malema he will give his viewers a good show 😂😂😂😂
You are fantastic!
🤔You forgot Rahma Zein..
She took no nonsense from Morgan and spoke openly..
Yes, I included a clip of her. She's brilliant!
Excellent Analyses made based on the Enemy’s Accusations.
Thank you.
#judeuslivresporPALESTINALIVRE
Love them ❤
I hope you don't interrupt the next video please,❤, a great video, I watched the complete debate, Morgan has to please his puppet handlers
You have to remember one thing, it' the oppressed that has the right to defend himself and not the oppressor. If you don't understand this, your are not a human being.
Amazing.
Great analysis!
Great idea to take on many interviews.
Thank you. That was a tough video to edit!
@@williambaryloyou did well!
Bassam yousof the best .wake up call for everyone
Very good strategy, he has
I'm Egyptian. I liked your analysis of things.
I'm Polish and i like your comment! Thank you
Muhammad Hijab is a professional debator and will not allow Morgan to put him in a corner. He knows Morgan's approach very well, and Morgan sensed it and ended the discussion early.
Piers is a liar 🤥 period!
this is why, I'm telling, that the prophet Muhammad SAW once warned us, muslim, to stay away from this kind debate.
This debate aim no in the truht. Its aim is only to beat their opponent, and in most case, it always make the truth even more hard to be seen because of how the conversation going on.
The prophet said :
"And whoever abandons debate, even though he is above the truth, Allah will build a house for him in heaven." (HR Tirmidhi and Ibnu Majah from Anas bin Malik).
This hadist is not telling us to be silent, or not telling us to stop telling the truth when injustice occurs. not telling us to not open the talk, of course. We need to talk, we need telling the truht when injustice occurs. We need to open a discourse.
But the point is, there is some kind of conversation you need to avoid. To avoid "this kind of debate". In my country, we categorize this thing as "cart driver debate". No truth can be seen from the debate. Just two guys trying to outplay each other with their strategy and technique. Their concern is always their arrogance to see who is the winner. Not to see which is the truth.
A conversation to seek truth doesn't need gimmick, strategy or anything. When you notice your opponent using those kind of thing, you should know that the conversation is not seeking for the truth. It's just a conversation to imposing the fallacy. Just stay away from it even if you are on the right side. Because the other side came to you with their own preterminded mind, which they already accept as a fact even before the conversation start, which indicate he is not seeking for the truht. So, telling him the truht is useless, because they don't want to hear the truht from you. They already have their own predeterminded truth inside his head. So, the conversation is useless, you better stay away from it.
Very true!
Bassam spoke very well and got his points across very well!
Trying to find an equivalency between the murder of 1500 innocent people and Israels refusal to supply water and electricity is mind-boggling
Yeah, for some people the Geneva convention is a joke
@@williambarylo
Might is the Right of the victors
Mr Hijab used logic mainly
Bassem used dark comedy and mocked their arrogance and lies
and these people don't use logic, they don't use their brains
so the Bassem approach is better in this case
that what I think
Indeed, most debates are not won with logic!
Another thing, if you noticed, this tv host always starts by asking the guests the same question about how they felt on October 7th (when Hamas attacked Israel). October 7th is just one piece in a conflict that has been going on for decades. Guests should ignore that single fragment and focus on 1948, when Palestine was occupied, when the state of Israel was proclaimed and recognized by the international community. That's the crux.
The fact that they want you to be ignorer in is :
Israel knew about the attack 10 days before
The violance that was happened against civilians deliberately was by armed israeli it wasn't in the name of Hamas
" The israeli people did manifestate in front of an Israeli hospital in which that wonded militants was being treated "
Very well presented. Pier could never walk in zmandels feet
Bassem had the best approach without "bully mode". The rest is just waste of time.
Maybe his approach works best against bullies!
Good analysis.
Ham4s is the resistance group established in 1987. Isr4el atrocities have been carried out since the unilateral Balfour Declaration proposed in the British in 1917.
A few years later but true, hamas was created much later
And Bibi supported the existence of Hamas to act as bulwark against a united Palestinian state
Divide and conquer
Hijab demolished Piers...😂
When did he attend Oxford? What are his qualification and in what subject? He doesn't come across as an Oxford graduate to me...
Usually people who go to Oxford end up with a very different accent! He did his one of his MAs at SOAS. I think Oxford is quite recent
@@williambarylo I thought the spirit of enquiry would have been more apparent, had he attended Oxford university...He seems to me very closed minded. A person who arrived there to teach them something...as if.
@@anthonycharnock6560 Going Oxford doesn't make you a better debater sadly. Most academic degrees are pieces of paper to put on your CV rather than teaching skills
@@williambarylo True,
Piers Morgan had only one line of questioning. 7 October
exactly